INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF ESTIMATING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 3.2 June 2006. 31-d Page 1 of 7



Similar documents
Master Document Audit Program. Version 7.4, dated November 2006 B-1 Planning Considerations. Purpose and Scope

INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF BILLING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 4.2 August 2006

Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.5, dated September 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations

The Changing Government Contractor Environment

Accounting System. Page 1 of 9

Preaward and Post Award Accounting System Audits. November 17, 2011 Pikes Peak NCMA Roland Wick

January (1) CHAPTER 5. Table of Contents

Presenting the Numbers: Accounting Systems for Government Contractors

NCMA MEETING PREPARING FOR A DCAA PRICE PROPOSAL AUDIT JUNE 8, 2011

Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System

Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors

FAR Table Instructions for Submitting Cost/Price Proposals When Cost or Pricing Data Are Required

Direct and Indirect Labor. The Scenario

CHAPTER 8. Table of Contents

Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors

AF Life Cycle Management Center

DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY CHECKLIST FOR DETERMINING ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR INCURRED COST PROPOSAL

July 6, (1) CHAPTER 11

October 14, (1)

CONTACT: 1. Proposed rule BDO GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING PRACTICE GUIDANCE ON THE PROPOSED DOE BUSINESS SYSTEM RULE

Cost Analysis Key Components Guidance and Checklist

Position Classification Standard for Management and Program Clerical and Assistance Series, GS-0344

DCAA Perspective: Key Subcontracting Practices for Maintaining Approved Business Systems Accounting System and Estimating System

How to Pass an Estimating System Review. February 27, 2013

TOPIC 12 CONTRACT COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS

Reasons for Change Orders

Certificate of Accounting, Billing and Property System Adequacy

Accounting Systems: Complying with FAR Requirements. John S. Sroka, CPA Acquisition Cost/Price Analyst

UNIT 34: COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

How to Develop a FAR-Compliant Cost or Price Proposal

February 3, (1) CHAPTER 12

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION AUDIT REPORT 2013/073

Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code Cost Impact Statement (Price Adjustment) Version 4.17, dated April 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations

Final Audit Follow-up As of January 31, 2014

Government Contract Accounting Are You DCAA Compliant? Procurement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)

How To Audit A Government Contractor

Monitoring Subcontracts. The views expressed in this presentation are DCAA's views and not necessarily the views of other DoD organizations

Activity Code Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS) Version 9.10, dated September 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations

Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts The New Policies

FAR UPDATE , Allowable Cost and Payment (Jun 2013)

Position Classification Standard for Industrial Property Management Series, GS Table of Contents

DOECAA Spring Conference Presentation. Cost Reimbursement Contracting Issues - DOE Proposed Business System Rule

Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.8, dated November B-01 Planning Considerations

Provisional Billing Rates. Beth Citeroni Acquisition Cost/Price Analyst

Accounting System Requirements

Accounting System Requirements

Defense Contract Audit Agency NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference

ISO :2005 Requirements Summary

PAS B.2.4 April 24, PAS-012(R)

DCAA and the Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program

Master Document Audit Program. or Interviews. Version 3.21, dated April 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations

REPORT 2014/078 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

Objectives. Single Audit: Recent Changes and Preparation Tips. Overview. Overview 1/20/2016

DCAA Guidelines. How the SBIR firm can work effectively with the Defense Contract Audit Agency

Software Quality Subcontractor Survey Questionnaire INSTRUCTIONS FOR PURCHASE ORDER ATTACHMENT Q-201

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION AUDIT PROGRAM

DCAA Our Role. Laura Cloyd-Hall, CPA, MBA John D. Mollohan II, CPA, CFE. Page 1. DCAA : Celebrating 50 Years of Excellence

Government Contractor Business Systems and Overview of System Assessments

October 20, (1)

Overview 1) Grantee s procurement requirements must be in conformance with the appropriate applicable Federal, State, and local laws.

Covance Construction Management Staffing Plan Chandler, Arizona

Work Breakdown Structure Element Dictionary Construction

WHAT MAKES AN ACCOUNTING SYSTEM COMPLIANT

DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2135 FORT BELVOIR, VA

Owner s project control review Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE, COLORADO RFP for Independent Professional Auditing Services

Basic Financial Requirements for Government Contracting

CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surgi Manufacturing Quality Manual

Construction Bond Audit Report. Office of Auditor General

THE DCAA AUDIT BECOMING DCAA COMPLIANT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) - Construction Management Services. Germantown School District Office

GAO DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDITS. Actions Needed to Improve DCAA's Access to and Use of Defense Company Internal Audit Reports

What Exactly is an Acceptable Accounting System?

Performance Element: Compare stocks, bonds, and commodities to determine advantages.

Quick Guide to Cost and Price Analysis for HUD Grantees and Funding Recipients

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) Number: DI-MGMT Approval Date:

DCAA Contract Audit Manual

Government Accounting, Estimating, and Billing Systems: Pitfalls and Answers

Project Management Agreement

Pricing of Construction Contract Change Order Documentation

Checklist for Operational Risk Management

Acquisition & Implementation of Software Information Systems

Transcription:

INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF ESTIMATING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 3.2 June 2006 Control Objectives Example Control Activities Audit Procedures 1. INTERNAL AUDITS Management should periodically perform independent reviews of estimating policies and procedures to ensure that they comply with applicable Federal regulations, have been properly implemented, and are operating effectively. 2. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Establish and maintain an Estimating System description including policies, procedures, and operating instructions compliant with FAR and DFARS. Policies and procedures should require periodic reviews of the estimating system to ensure that: Policies and procedures are compliant with applicable Federal regulations. Policies and procedures have been implemented and are working effectively. Follow-up actions are taken on recommendations resulting from management reviews. Establish clear responsibility for preparation, review, and approval of cost estimates. Page 1 of 7 a. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they require periodic review of established policies and procedures to ensure that: Policies and procedures are compliant with applicable Federal regulations. Policies and procedures have been implemented and are working effectively. Follow-up actions are taken on recommendations resulting from management reviews. b. Evaluate the contractor's record of completed internal audits and current internal audit plan to determine if the Estimating System is being subject to periodic reviews in accordance with established policies and c. Identify any reviews which may have an impact on this audit and evaluate the audit reports and supporting working papers to determine if any system deficiencies were noted and the extent to which we can rely on the work performed (see CAM 4-1000). a. Obtain organization charts and written policies, procedures, and directives describing the organization structure and responsibilities of the estimating group(s) and contributing departments.

b. Obtain flowcharts showing the flow of work in the estimating process and integration of data prepared by personnel responsible for various functions such as accounting, cost control, budgeting, planning, purchasing, production control, engineering, estimating, and sales. Key decision and review points, and time frame for the entire process should be identified by the contractor. c. Determine it the following characteristics of an adequate system exist: Establish and maintain a formal written statement of policies and procedures covering all significant estimating system process, activities, and functions. Lines of authority, duties, and responsibilities which are clearly defined. Coordination among various segments of the organization responsible for different parts of the estimate. Designation of individuals authorized to approve requests for preparing estimates. d. Interview selected employees involved in the proposal preparation process to determine if the actual responsibility for preparing, reviewing, and approving cost estimates is consistent with established policies and e. Determine if written policies are established at a high enough organizational level to allow for proper implementation. f. g. Determine if procedures are in writing and compatible with underlying policies. Determine if: Policies, procedures, and other written instructions are disseminated to all Page 2 of 7

employees responsible for putting the estimates together. Revisions to policies, procedures, and instructions are timely as changes occur in the Estimating System. h. Throughout the remainder of this examination, be alert for any areas in which established estimating policies and procedures are either 3. TRAINING Assure that assigned personnel have sufficient training, experience, and guidance to perform estimating tasks in accordance with established 4. COST ESTIMATE DEVELOPMENT Ensure that cost estimates are developed using acceptable estimating methods and rationale and that supporting data is current, accurate, Integration with Other Management Systems Provide for the integration of information from other management systems as appropriate. Provide training to employees (including technical employees) involved in the estimating process in the application of estimating techniques including appropriate proposal file documentation Train selected estimating employees, where appropriate, in the use of statistical aids and advanced estimating techniques including appropriate proposal file documentation Establish written guidelines governing the estimating methods and rationale to be used in developing cost estimates including: Page 3 of 7 inadequate or incomplete. a. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they provide for the integration of information from other management systems as appropriate. b. Selectively evaluate recent pricing proposals or other cost estimates to determine if information from other management systems was appropriately integrated into the cost estimates. a. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they require periodic training of all employees involved in the estimating process, including, when appropriate, the use of statistical aids and advanced estimating techniques. b. Evaluate records of completed training, or other evidence, indicating that appropriate employees have been trained in accordance with established policies and a. Evaluate the adequacy and appropriateness of the methods employed in preparing cost estimates for each proposal type. Consider the

and complete. Differences in estimating methods for different types of proposals. The clear identification of pricing policies for sensitive areas as identified by the Government and contractor. The use of historical experience where appropriate, including the results of negotiations with subcontractors and suppliers as to price adjustments of initial bids or proposals. The appropriate use of analytical techniques in developing and/or evaluating cost estimates. Page 4 of 7 b. c. d. e. following: The nature of the products or services procured. The degree of firmness of specifications. The contractor's experience with the same or similar products or services. The extent detailed cost data can be derived from the accounting system, adjunct statistical records, etc. The relative dollar amount of the estimates. Cost and time restrictions on preparation of the estimates. Evaluate the extent to which the contractor has identified the estimating practices for sensitive cost areas. Determine if the contractor has procedures in place to ensure that practices used to estimate costs are consistent with accounting practices used in accumulating costs (CAS 401) and to ensure that estimated costs are consistently classified between direct and indirect (CAS 402). Evaluate the extent to which estimating methods make use of historical data relating to entire products and individual tasks; and indirect cost ratios and percentage factors applicable to a common base. Determine if cost estimates based upon prior cost experience consider: Differences in complexity, quantity, rate of production, state of development, etc., between items previously produced and those for which estimates are being developed.

Applicability of preproduction engineering, special tooling, plant rearrangement, and other nonrecurring costs. Anticipated changes in production methods material usage, prices, wage rates, labor efficiency, production volume, plant capacity, and make-or-buy structure. f. Evaluate the applicability of historical standard cost variance factors. (Where standards have been revised to represent expected actual cost, historical cost variances are not applicable). g. Evaluate the appropriateness of escalation factors proposed and the methods used to apply them to the cost elements. h. Evaluate the availability and use of incurred cost records in developing estimates if the contractor is given the authorization to proceed before a contract price is negotiated. i. Evaluate the propriety of using company-wide forward pricing factors for preparing cost estimates. Are such factors current; based upon reliable cost data and procedures; and correctly applied? j. Evaluate the reasonableness of formula pricing methods for spare parts to ensure that individual elements of costs are not duplicated in both base costs and loading factors. k. If used by the contractor, evaluate the adequacy of catalog pricing and prepriced listing methods for developing reasonable prices for spare parts proposals. l. Evaluate the adequacy of the contractor's methods for developing cost estimates for contract changes. Page 5 of 7

Do the estimates properly reflect the nature and scope of the change, and the status of the work in process at the time the change is issued? Are the contractor's procedures for pricing deleted work correct? (Work deleted but not yet performed should be priced at estimated current cost). Provide standardized formats for proposals and the submission of supporting data. Require that appropriate cost/price analysis be performed for all subcontracts prior to certification of the prime contract price. Provide for consistent application of estimating techniques through proper control and supervision of the estimating process. Page 6 of 7 m. Determine if proposals are submitted on the appropriate forms and if related support data contain enough detail to permit an adequate evaluation of cost estimates. Is the basis for each cost element disclosed? n. When a certificate of current cost or pricing data is required, does the contractor adequately identify the cost or pricing data submitted? o. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they establish responsibility for the review and analysis of subcontracts. p. Selectively evaluate recent pricing proposals or other cost estimates to determine if cost/price analysis of subcontracts were performed as required by the policies and q. Determine if controls are in place to ensure: Timely submission of data at all phases of the proposal preparation process. Uniformity of approach, detection of errors, and prevention of duplication. r. Determine if the following characteristics of an adequate estimating system exist: Adequate supervision in each area and at each level of the estimating process. Managerial reviews at interim points and

upon completion of the estimating process. Management reviews covering the soundness of judgmental estimates, adherence to established policies and procedures, and compliance with pertinent regulations. Estimators who summarize and document the conditions, assumptions, risks, etc. taken into consideration in developing estimates. 5. CONTRACT CERTIFICATION To ensure that all cost or pricing data is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of agreement on price. Establish written procedures for updating cost or pricing data throughout the proposal evaluation and negotiation process. s. Determine whether proposed direct labor rates reflect the total hours employees are expected to work during the year as covered in CAM 9-505b, Evaluation of Estimated Direct Labor Rates. a. Evaluate the contractor s policies and procedures to determine whether they adequately provide for updating of cost or pricing data up to the point of agreement on price. b. Selectively evaluate recent post-award audits to determine if they indicate that the contractor is not updating cost or pricing data as provided for in the policies and Page 7 of 7