IP interconnect interface for SIP/SIP-I



Similar documents
SIP-I signalling interface for Sweden

SIP-I signalling interface for Sweden

Guide to TCP/IP, Third Edition. Chapter 3: Data Link and Network Layer TCP/IP Protocols

VoIP network planning guide

EITF25 Internet Techniques and Applications L5: Wide Area Networks (WAN) Stefan Höst

- Multiprotocol Label Switching -

Examination. IP routning på Internet och andra sammansatta nät, DD2491 IP routing in the Internet and other complex networks, DD2491

Data Networking and Architecture. Delegates should have some basic knowledge of Internet Protocol and Data Networking principles.

Data Communication Networks and Converged Networks

Course Overview: Learn the essential skills needed to set up, configure, support, and troubleshoot your TCP/IP-based network.

Introduction to Differentiated Services (DiffServ) and HP-UX IPQoS

MPLS Basics. For details about MPLS architecture, refer to RFC 3031 Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture.

Mobile IP Network Layer Lesson 02 TCP/IP Suite and IP Protocol

Ethernet. Ethernet. Network Devices

MPLS-based Virtual Private Network (MPLS VPN) The VPN usually belongs to one company and has several sites interconnected across the common service

F5 Silverline DDoS Protection Onboarding: Technical Note

MPLS Architecture for evaluating end-to-end delivery

How Routers Forward Packets

Service Definition. Internet Service. Introduction. Product Overview. Service Specification

enetworks TM IP Quality of Service B.1 Overview of IP Prioritization

Internet Protocol: IP packet headers. vendredi 18 octobre 13

Using OSPF in an MPLS VPN Environment

Internet, Part 2. 1) Session Initiating Protocol (SIP) 2) Quality of Service (QoS) support. 3) Mobility aspects (terminal vs. personal mobility)

AWS Direct Connect. User Guide API Version

APPLICATION NOTE 211 MPLS BASICS AND TESTING NEEDS. Label Switching vs. Traditional Routing

MPLS VPN Route Target Rewrite

What is VLAN Routing?

CS 457 Lecture 19 Global Internet - BGP. Fall 2011

Technical Support Information Belkin internal use only

Implementing MPLS VPNs over IP Tunnels on Cisco IOS XR Software

IP - The Internet Protocol

Network Layer: Network Layer and IP Protocol

Interconnection of Heterogeneous Networks. Internetworking. Service model. Addressing Address mapping Automatic host configuration

MPLS VPN Services. PW, VPLS and BGP MPLS/IP VPNs

Advanced VSAT Solutions Bridge Point-to-Multipoint (BPM) Overview

ESSENTIALS. Understanding Ethernet Switches and Routers. April 2011 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1 A TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT TO CONTROL NETWORK

Network Protocol Configuration

OVERLAYING VIRTUALIZED LAYER 2 NETWORKS OVER LAYER 3 NETWORKS

Using the Border Gateway Protocol for Interdomain Routing

Analyzing Capabilities of Commercial and Open-Source Routers to Implement Atomic BGP

IP Networking. Overview. Networks Impact Daily Life. IP Networking - Part 1. How Networks Impact Daily Life. How Networks Impact Daily Life

How To Make A Network Secure

BGP Link Bandwidth. Finding Feature Information. Contents

: Interconnecting Cisco Networking Devices Part 1 v2.0 (ICND1)

Overview of Routing between Virtual LANs

Quidway MPLS VPN Solution for Financial Networks

Computer Networks CS321

IP SAN BEST PRACTICES

Procedure: You can find the problem sheet on Drive D: of the lab PCs. 1. IP address for this host computer 2. Subnet mask 3. Default gateway address

MPLS. Cisco MPLS. Cisco Router Challenge 227. MPLS Introduction. The most up-to-date version of this test is at:

UK Interconnect White Paper

Balcan-IX Services Description

Redundancy & the Netnod Internet Exchange Points

Quality of Service (QoS) Setup Guide (NB604n)

DD2491 p MPLS/BGP VPNs. Olof Hagsand KTH CSC

Network Layer IPv4. Dr. Sanjay P. Ahuja, Ph.D. Fidelity National Financial Distinguished Professor of CIS. School of Computing, UNF

Computer Networks 1 (Mạng Máy Tính 1) Lectured by: Dr. Phạm Trần Vũ

EarthLink Business SIP Trunking. NEC SV8100 IP PBX Customer Configuration Guide

2. IP Networks, IP Hosts and IP Ports

IP/MPLS-Based VPNs Layer-3 vs. Layer-2

Demonstrating the high performance and feature richness of the compact MX Series

Networked AV Systems Pretest

Disaster Recovery Design Ehab Ashary University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

Implementing MPLS VPNs over IP Tunnels

Faculty of Engineering Computer Engineering Department Islamic University of Gaza Network Chapter# 19 INTERNETWORK OPERATION

Configuring IP Load Sharing in AOS Quick Configuration Guide

PRASAD ATHUKURI Sreekavitha engineering info technology,kammam

BGP Link Bandwidth. Finding Feature Information. Prerequisites for BGP Link Bandwidth

Exterior Gateway Protocols (BGP)

Configuring for Integra Telecom SIP Solutions

Transport and Network Layer

Performance Evaluation of VoIP Services using Different CODECs over a UMTS Network

Methods of interconnecting MPLS Networks

Chapter 9. IP Secure

Internetworking. Problem: There is more than one network (heterogeneity & scale)

MPLS VPN over mgre. Finding Feature Information. Prerequisites for MPLS VPN over mgre

Networking Technology Online Course Outline

Network Level Multihoming and BGP Challenges

Network layer: Overview. Network layer functions IP Routing and forwarding

Advanced Higher Computing. Computer Networks. Homework Sheets

IP videoconferencing solution with ProCurve switches and Tandberg terminals

Internet Control Protocols Reading: Chapter 3

DD2491 p BGP-MPLS VPNs. Olof Hagsand KTH/CSC

Networking Test 4 Study Guide

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)

CCNA R&S: Introduction to Networks. Chapter 5: Ethernet

Quality of Service in the Internet. QoS Parameters. Keeping the QoS. Traffic Shaping: Leaky Bucket Algorithm

Mathatma Gandhi University

SERVICE DESCRIPTION INTERNET TRANSIT / 2.6.4

MPLS-based Layer 3 VPNs

Session Border Controller

Course Description. Students Will Learn

MPLS VPN Security Best Practice Guidelines

CCT vs. CCENT Skill Set Comparison

Introduction to TCP/IP

Dell PowerVault MD Series Storage Arrays: IP SAN Best Practices

Configure A VoIP Network

Cisco Configuring Commonly Used IP ACLs

Transcription:

Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 1 (7) IP interconnect interface for SIP/SIP-I 0 Document history... 2 1 Scope... 2 2 References... 2 3 Definitions/Acronyms... 3 4 IP Interconnect specification... 4 4.1 Physical connection... 4 4.2 IP interface specification... 5 4.2.1 Ethernet specification... 5 4.2.2 Other IP addresses... 6 4.3 Routing protocols... 6 4.4 QoS marking... 6 4.5 SLA 6 4.6 IP security... 7 5 Influenced node types and equipment... 7 TeliaSonera Broadband Services / BTS / VoiceCom systems

Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 2 (7) 0 DOCUMENT HISTORY ision Amendments 1.0 2013-12-16 New document 2.0 2014-03-24 New version/hans Ahlsmo 3.0 2014-06-13 Small update and separate IP addresses used for signalling and media./hans Ahlsmo 1 SCOPE This specification is to be used between a national fixed or mobile operator in Sweden using SIP/IP or SIP-I/IP interconnects towards TeliaSonera fixed network (PSTN). Both originating/terminating and transit call scenarios are supported based on ref. [1, 2 and 3]. The signalling and media information is transported using IP network. The requirements are defined using following principles/meaning: (M) Mandatory requirement (R) Nice to have requirement (O) Optional requirement 2 REFERENCES Documents referred to in this specification are listed below: [1] 8211-A353 SIP-I signalling interface for Sweden [2] 8211-A354 Media interconnect interface for SIP/SIP-I [3] 8211-A356 Address formats for Swedish national SIP/SIP-I interconnection [4] Mandatory and recommended IETF RFCs RFC 768: (M) UDP RFC 791: (M) IP RFC 792: (M) ICMP RFC 793: (M) TCP RFC 826: (M) An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol RFC 894: (M) A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over Ethernet Networks RFC 1042: (M) A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over IEEE 802 Networks RFC 2474: (M) Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers (updated by 3168 and 3260) RFC 2475: (M) An Architecture for Differentiated Services (updated by 3260) RFC 2597: (M) Assured Forwarding PHB Group

[5] Mandatory and recommended IEEE specifications Security Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 3 (7) RFC 2598: (M) Expedited Forwarding PHB RFC 3140: (M) Per Hop Behaviour Identification Codes RFC 5080: (R) Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) RFC 5081: (R) Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop) BGP - RFC 4271: (M) A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) RFC 4277: (M) Experience with the BGP-4 Protocol 802.3ae (R) 10 Gigabit Ethernet over optical fibre 802.3z (M) 1000BASE-LX Gigabit Ethernet over optical fibre 802.2 (M) Logical Link Control 802.1q (M) Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks [6] Regulatory req. LEK: Lag (2003:389) om elektronisk kommunikation [7] 8211-A357 SIP signalling interface for Sweden 3 DEFINITIONS/ACRONYMS AS Autonomous System ASBR AS Border Router BFD Bidirectional Forwarding Detection BGP Border Gateway Protocol BW Bandwidth DSCP Differentiated Services Control Point E-BGP External BGP FQDN Fully Qualified Domain Name ICMP Internet Control Message Protocol IPDV IP Delay IPLR IP Loss Rate IPP IP precedence bits IPTD IP Transfer Delay LAN Local Area Network MD5 Message Digest 5 MED Multi-Exit Discriminator MPLS Multi-Protocol Label Switching MTU Maximum Transfer Unit NSF Non-Stop Forwarding NSR NSF Router PE Provider Edge POI Point Of Interconnect This is a physical interface which means that the Operator fibre is terminated in TeliaSonera ODF. RD Route Distinguisher RT Route Target RTP Real-Time Protocol SBC Session Border Controller SIP Session Initiation Protocol SIP-I Encapsulated ISUP in SIP SMF Single Mode Fibre TCP Transport Control Protocol UDP User Datagram Protocol

Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 4 (7) VLAN VPN VRF Virtual LAN Virtual Private Network VPN Routing and Forwarding instance 4 IP INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION The IP interconnect (POI) is based on direct physical cables between PE routers in the other operator network and PE routers in the TeliaSonera network. It is preferred to have geographical redundant links to achieve high availability. The signalling and media information from/to the PE router is then routed in a secure network (typically L3 VPN) to the corresponding SBC (optional) or Telephony network where the call is terminated. The POI is described in the following figure: The figure shows an example of a SIP/IP or SIP-I/IP interconnects between TeliaSonera and Operator X. The design/implementation could be different compared to the figure. 4.1 Physical connection The following physical connection alternatives shall apply: 1 Gbit/s optical fibre (SMF) link according to 1000BASE-LX IEEE 802.3z. REQ 01

Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 5 (7) 10 Gbits/s optical fibre (SMF) link according to IEEE 802.3ae. Depending on the distance between the PE routers 10GBASE-LR, 10GBASE-ER or 10GBASE-ZR optics may be used. In both cases the physical connection shall be based on: a) Network Sales Operatörsförbindelse. b) Skanova Fibre 2009 (SMF) according to ITU-T G.652. c) Fibre pairs in an Operator trunk. The IP interconnect (POI) shall be based on direct physical cables between PE routers in the other operator network and PE routers in the TeliaSonera network. It is preferred (option) to have geographical redundant links to achieve high availability. REQ 02 REQ 03 REQ 04 REQ 05 4.2 IP interface specification The following shall apply for the IP interface specification in the PE router: TS will use a unique VRF defined per operator. REQ 06 The IP interface in the PE shall use the following parameter values: a) IP addresses using IPv4 standard specified in RFC 791. b) IP addresses at the peering link is recommended to use public IP addresses if possible but private IP addresses will be accepted after agreement with TS. c) The peering connection owner shall provide IP addresses. d) Subnet /31 is recommended to be used if possible (Option) for the peering links. e) The MTU size shall be < 1500 bytes. f) Required BW capacity shall be based on telephony traffic volumes. g) If BW capacity (or rate limit) is exceeded the overflow packets shall be dropped. h) IP packets shall not be reordered or fragmented. REQ 07 i) BFD should be used on the IP link (Optional but preferred if used mutually) with the preferred settings interval 300 min_rx 300 multiplier 3. j) If BFD is used no BFD echo shall be sent. k) ICMP (PING) messages shall be allowed in the IP network between the PE routers but will not be allowed in the TS SBC. l) Traceroute messages shall be allowed in the IP network all the way except last hop to the SBC. m) Multicast traffic shall not be supported. n) Incoming DSCP value will be trusted and shall have the correct QoS marking (defined by each operator). o) Remarking of DSCP in packets to the other operator will be made in the TS PE router. 4.2.1 Ethernet specification Ethernet specification (frame according to Ethernet II) according to IEEE 802.3 with 802.2 headers. REQ 08

Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 6 (7) 4.2.2 Other IP addresses SBC is recommended to use public IP addresses if possible. Private IP addresses can be accepted by TS after agreement. REQ 09 IP addresses for SBC, FQDN, RTP and SIP/SIP-I shall be provided by each party. REQ 10 FQDN is not used for routing and IP addresses are used instead. REQ 11 One IP-address is used on the TS side for SIP/SIP-I signalling. REQ 12 One IP-address (other than used for SIP/SIP-I) is used on the TS side for RTP. IPv6 Addresses are not supported. REQ 13 DNS is not used for translation of FQDNs to IP addresses. REQ 14 4.3 Routing protocols The following routing protocols and options shall be used: a) E-BGP according to BGPv4: RFC 4271 shall be supported and required extensions. b) E-BGP shall be used between ASBR without MPLS and using Inter-AS option A. c) E-BGP graceful restart, NSF or NSR shall not be used. d) E-BGP communities shall be used with local significance. e) E-BGP MD5 password shall be used between ASBR. f) timers (default) Hot Potato routing according to RFC 4277: Where traffic flows between a pair of destinations, each is connected to two transit networks, each of the transit networks has the choice of sending the traffic to the peering closest to another transit provider. Hot potato routing/closest exit routing is accomplished by not passing the EBGP-learned MED into the IBGP. This minimizes transit traffic for the provider routing the traffic. REQ 15 REQ 16 The traffic will be routed internally (own network) using lowest cost/shortest path and then routed to the closest ASBR where the packet is handed over to the other Operator. 4.4 QoS marking The following QoS marking of IP packets shall be used: Each operator is responsible for the correct QoS marking of IP packets when sending the packets to the destination PE router. REQ 17 4.5 SLA The following SLA parameter values shall be used as guidelines for the transport of signalling and media packets in each IP network: a) IPLR (IP packet drop rate) < 0.02%. b) IPTD (IP Transfer delay) < 50ms (one-way delay). c) IPDV (IP Delay Variation < 4ms. REQ 18

Page INTERCONNECT SPECIFICATION Public 7 (7) 4.6 IP security The transport of signalling and media information must be secure and conform to ref. [6] document. In order to implement a secure network/transport the following guidelines applies: The operator (also includes TeliaSonera) is not allowed to advertise received public/private IP addresses to the open public Internet. (This means that the received REQ 19 public/private IP addresses must be kept inside the VPNs to hide them for being accessible from the public Internet.) Each operator is also responsible for a secure transport of signalling and media information. (The signalling and media information from/to the PE router is then REQ 20 routed in a secure network (typically L3 VPN) to the corresponding SBC (optional) or Telephony network where the call is terminated.) If the operator route the signalling and media information over an IP network which is not controlled/owned by the operator the operator is then responsible for that this REQ 21 transport is secure and complies with ref. [6] and quality guidelines according to ITU-T Y.1540 and Y.1541. A unique VRF is defined per operator. REQ 22 The operator is connected with direct physical links to the TeliaSonera PE routers. REQ 23 Existing ACL filters in PE and SBC (optional) shall be configured to only allow REQ 24 agreed traffic. No encryption of signalling or media is allowed. REQ 25 5 INFLUENCED NODE TYPES AND EQUIPMENT The equipment affected is TeliaSonera fixed transit network nodes and Operator X network nodes.