Working together: Racial discrimination in New Zealand



Similar documents
Strong connection between ICT and business-growth activities

Nukunonu atoll profile: 2011 Tokelau Census of Population and Dwellings

Integrated Data Infrastructure and prototype

Introducing expanded external lending and debt statistics

IDI Data Dictionary: Student loans and allowances data from StudyLink

Student Loans and Allowances: 2010

Innovation in New Zealand: 2011

IDI Data Dictionary: ACC injury claims data. June 2015 edition

Abortion Statistics: Year ended December 2012

OneView (Customer Relationship Management ) Administrator

Citation Statistics New Zealand (2014) Census QuickStats about housing. Available from ISBN (online)

Code of practice for employers Avoiding unlawful discrimination while preventing illegal working

Using cellphone data to measure population movements. Experimental analysis following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake

Corporate support administrator Christchurch

EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES & DIVERSITY POLICY

Wholesale Trade Survey: December 2014 quarter

Performance Information Analyst - Business Intelligence

QuickStats About Auckland Region

Electronic Card Transactions: January 2016

IDI Data Dictionary: Student loans and allowances data from Inland Revenue

Labour Cost Index (All Labour Costs): June 2015 quarter

Diversity and Equality Policy

Macarthur Minerals Limited CODE OF CONDUCT. February 2012

Data integration manual: 2nd edition

(g) the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003,

Employment Rights and Responsibilities

Job Application Form

A quick guide to Australian discrimination laws

OUR WORKPLACE DIVERSITY PROGRAM. Diversity is important to AFSA.

Racial Harassment and Discrimination Definitions and Examples (quotes are from the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry report, 23 March, 1999)

New Zealand General Social Survey 2016: Objectives of the Civic and Cultural Participation supplement

VOLUNTEERS & THE LAW

Last Name First M.I. Date. Street Address Apartment/Unit # License Number: License Expiration Date:

The Act protects people from discrimination on the basis of protected characteristics. The relevant characteristics are:

Vacancies. Advice Workers- Edinburgh 2 Full Time (Job share might be considered) (36.25 hours a week/ 20,931 per annum )

School Bullying Survey

BELMORES Criminal Defence & Road Traffic Solicitors EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY

Procurement driving better value for money. Evaluation Panels. A guide for evaluation-panel Chairs

Chief Information Officer

FURTHER EDUCATION Place of education Type of training Qualification

NHS Business Services Authority HR Policies Career Breaks

A GUIDE TO SCREENING AND SELECTION IN EMPLOYMENT.

Colchester Borough Council. Equality Impact Assessment Form - An Analysis of the Effects on Equality. Section 1: Initial Equality Impact Assessment

Personal Details Surname Surname at birth, if different Any other names by which you have been known

Who can benefit from charities?

Equal marriage What the government says

Minimum employment rights and obligations

Renting Hotel Rooms to Minors

POLICY: DIVERSITY/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) September 2008 Version: V Contents. Introduction. Scope. Purpose.

FIDELITY APPLICANT PRIVACY AND PROTECTION NOTICE

How Wakefield Council is working to make sure everyone is treated fairly

WORKPLACE DIVERSITY PROGRAM

Equal Opportunity, Discrimination and Harassment

Workplace Diversity Program

Application for Employment

Guide to e-commerce. Electronic transactions under Government Model Contracts. Procurement driving better value

Equality Act 2010: Know Your Rights!

What Not to Ask When Interviewing Candidates

Applicants Name: Hair Stylist. Employment Application Form +

Remuneration of Public Service and State sector senior staff as at 30 June 2013

CREW Philadelphia Philanthropic Partner Application General Information, Application & Instructions GENERAL INFORMATION

Pre-employment inquiries

Changes in home-ownership patterns : Focus on Māori and Pacific people

EU Employment Law Euro Info Centre December 2006

How to write a policy to prevent. Harassment. by Louise Pohl

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Handbook

Lesson 3: HOW TO WRITE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Remuneration of Public Service and State sector senior staff as at 30 June 2012

APPRAISAL POLICY 1. BACKGROUND

Introduction. Pre-employment inquiries: You can respect human rights in hiring. What you can do What you can ask

EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY & PROCEDURE MICHAEL W HALSALL (SOLICITORS)

NHS Business Services Authority HR Policies Annual Leave

Canadian Pacific Railway

DRAFT MODEL POLICY ON ACCOMMODATION. TO: All employers in the legal profession in Nova Scotia

Application Form. Section 1 Personal Details. Oldham Hulme Grammar Schools Veale Wasbrough Lawyers Position Applied For: Title:

The Los Angeles Child Guidance Clinic

Equality Act (Briefing note updated March 2012 to reflect Specific Duties Regulations and the proposed Scottish Specific Duties)

Rights, duties and responsibilities of a letting agent, landlord and tenant

Transcription:

Working together: Racial discrimination in New Zealand 1

Crown copyright This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. You are free to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to Statistics NZ and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording 'Statistics New Zealand' in your attribution, not the Statistics NZ logo. Liability While all care and diligence has been used in processing, analysing, and extracting data and information in this publication, Statistics New Zealand gives no warranty it is error free and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the use directly, or indirectly, of the information in this publication. Citation Statistics New Zealand (2012). Working together: Racial discrimination in New Zealand. Available from www.stats.govt.nz ISBN 978-0-478-377880-0 (online) Published in September 2012 by Statistics New Zealand Tatauranga Aotearoa Wellington, New Zealand Contact Statistics New Zealand Information Centre: info@stats.govt.nz Phone toll-free 0508 525 525 Phone international +64 4 931 4610 www.stats.govt.nz 2

1 Racial discrimination in New Zealand Purpose statement This short report uses data from the New Zealand General Social Survey (NZGSS) to look at whether New Zealanders feel racially discriminated against. It also provides background data on overall levels of perceived discrimination and where this takes place. Ten percent of New Zealanders feel discriminated against The Human Rights Act 1993 protects people in New Zealand from discrimination in a number of areas of life. Discrimination occurs when a person is treated unfairly, or less favourably, than another person in the same or similar circumstances. The NZGSS asked New Zealand adults (15 years or over) whether they felt discriminated against over the past year. This report uses combined data from the 2008 and 2010 General Social Surveys and is therefore based on a sample of 17,271 respondents. One in ten people aged 15 or over reported experiencing some form of discrimination in the last 12 months. This equates to an estimated 343,000 New Zealanders. Figure 1 shows the reasons why people felt they had been discriminated against. To be counted as having experienced discrimination, respondents must report that they have been treated unfairly or had something nasty done to them because of the group they belong to or seem to belong to. Respondents could choose as many reasons as they thought relevant. 3

Working together: Racial discrimination in New Zealand Figure 1 Skin colour, race, ethnicity, or nationality Respondents who felt discriminated against By reason Dress or appearance Age Sex Occupation The language they speak Religious beliefs Disability or health issue Marital status Political position Family status Sexual orientation Reason Source: Statistics New Zealand 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent of those discriminated against who selected this reason Racial discrimination is the most common form of discrimination people experience Six percent of respondents (an estimated 187,000 New Zealanders) believed racial discrimination was the reason for them being treated unfairly or unfavourably. Two response categories have been combined from the survey to report on racial discrimination. These are skin colour and nationality, race, or ethnicity. It should be noted that the dress or appearance, religious beliefs, and language spoken reasons may also be factors behind racial discrimination, but as they can be linked to other identity characteristics, they have been kept separate in this report. The numbers of respondents who felt discriminated against on the basis of their skin colour, nationality, race, or ethnicity allows us to further analyse the data. Asians report highest levels of racial discrimination People who identified as Asian reported the highest levels of racial discrimination in any setting, followed by Mäori and Pacific peoples, who reported similar levels of racial discrimination. Figure 2 looks at those who reported experiencing racial discrimination in the last 12 months, in any situation, by ethnicity. 4

Working together: Racial discrimination in New Zealand Figure 2 100 80 60 Respondents who experienced racial discrimination in the last 12 months By ethnicity Percent of entire population Did not experience racial discrimination Experienced racial discrimination 40 20 0 European Pacific peoples Māori Asian Ethnicity Source: Statistics New Zealand Discrimination most common in employment situations The places where all types of discrimination are most likely to happen are outlined below in figure 3. Respondents may have experienced discrimination in more than one place/situation and all reported places are counted in the survey. Figure 3 Respondents who felt discriminated against By place On the street or in a public place of any kind At work or while working Getting service when buying something At home Applying for or keeping a job or position Dealing with people involved in health care Getting into or at a school or place of learning Dealing with the police Dealing with other government officials Transport Dealing with the courts Joining an association or club of any kind Applying for or keeping a flat or housing of any kind Place of discrimination Source: Statistics New Zealand 0 10 20 30 40 Percent of those discriminated against who selected this place People surveyed in the NZGSS reported that the highest levels of discrimination occurred in employment settings. Overall, 4.3 percent (or an estimated 143,000 New Zealanders) said they had been discriminated against, either while at work, or when working or while applying for (or keeping) a job or position. This was followed by 4.0 percent of participants (or an estimated 136,000 New Zealanders) who felt they had been discriminated against while on the street or in a public place. 5

Working together: Racial discrimination in New Zealand Spotlight on racial discrimination at work An estimated 77,700 people, or 2.3 percent of respondents, reported experiencing racial discrimination in employment situations (while working or when applying for/keeping a job). This rate is similar to those who have experienced racial discrimination while on the street or in a public place, with 2.5 percent of participants (an estimated 85,200 New Zealanders) reporting this. The findings on racial discrimination in the workplace are of particular interest to those monitoring human rights, because New Zealand employers are obliged to provide a safe working environment for their employees. Employees are protected from racial discrimination under the Human Rights Act 1993, and the Employment Relations Act 2000 introduced processes for monitoring and reporting racial discrimination in the workplace. When looking specifically at the working age population in the survey (defined as those aged 18 65), 2.0 percent of respondents (or an estimated 64,100 people) reported experiencing racial discrimination at work or while working in the past 12 months. Statistical modelling based on this group of people, shows that Mäori, Pacific, and Asian peoples are all more likely to report experiencing racial discrimination in the workplace than the majority group (Europeans). Migrants are more likely to experience racial discrimination in the workplace than nonmigrants (people born in New Zealand). Racial discrimination is not only associated with a person s ethnic group, but also whether or not they were born in New Zealand. People who hold a formal qualification (secondary school, trade, or university) are more likely to report racial discrimination in the workplace than those with no qualifications. When applying the same statistical model to racial discrimination in a public place and to overall racial discrimination, having a qualification does not mean that you are more likely to report experiencing racial discrimination. Methodology The data is pooled from the 2008 and 2010 NZGSS. This larger sample size helps reduce statistical error in analysis and makes additional research questions feasible. The variables of interest have been tested (using estimates and residual standard errors) to ensure there are no significant statistical differences between the surveys. Weights for the pooled data set are created by dividing the existing weights by two. A logistic regression model was used to determine the relationship between the explanatory variables and the response variable. Regression models describe how the response variable changes according to the changes in values of explanatory or predictor variables. Since the experience of racial discrimination in the workplace was measured using a binary response variable (yes, no) an ordinary least squares regression could not be used. Instead, a logistic regression was used to measure the relationship between the explanatory variables and the response variable. The explanatory variables were based on demographic indicators including sex, age, ethnicity, migrant status, and highest qualification. 6