ENVIROENERGY SOLUTIONS. Presentation of APC and Wet Electrostatic Precipitation Technology



Similar documents
Multi-pollutant control solutions for coal based power plants

Assessing the Changes Required by the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulations

INTRODUCTION. Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources

Phoenix Process Engineering, Inc. Project Experience Helping Clients Achieve MACT Compliance

Bill Maxwell, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OAQPS (C439-01)

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Boilers and Process Heaters

FACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS

Roadmap Performance Target Best technology Capability

Comparison of selected plasma technologies

SLMA Meeting. Boiler MACT and Related Rules. Atlanta, GA March 2, Martin Rollins, P. E. H. M. Rollins Company, Inc. Gulfport, Mississippi

Wolverine Clean Energy Venture

Basic Mercury Data & Coal Fired Power Plants

The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the Mercury Air Toxics Standard (MATS)

Appendix 5A: Natural Gas Use in Industrial Boilers

Sewage and Wastewater Odor Control Dr. Giancarlo Riva, Ozono Elettronica Internazionale, Muggio, Italy

TODAY S THERMAL OXIDIZER SOLUTIONS TO MEET TOMORROW S CHALLENGES

Continuous Emissions Monitoring - Program 77

Flue Gas Mercury Removal Using Carbon- Polymer Composite Material

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

POLLUTED EMISSION TREATMENTS FROM INCINERATOR GASES

GUIDELINES FOR PROCESSING AND USING REFUSE DERIVED FUEL (RDF) IN CEMENT INDUSTRY

The Fate of Ammonia and Mercury in the Carbon Burn-Out (CBO ) Process

Chapter 12 Industrial Ventilation

IT3 01 Conference, Philadelphia, PA, May 14-18, 2001

Sulfur Tail Gas Thermal Oxidizer Systems By Peter Pickard

Site Identification No.: AAO Application No.:

Evaluating Thermal & Catalytic Oxidation Technology for VOC, HAP & Odor Abatement. John Strey

Air Pollution and its Control Measures

Mercury Speciation in Flue Gas from Coal-fired Power Stations

MATS and Boiler Rules

Particulate Matter Emissions-Control Options for Wood Boiler Systems

CoalGen 2010 Pre-Air Heater Control of SO3 and Related Condensables

Statement of Basis SCA Tissue North America, LLC

MILLIKEN CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT UNIT 2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS BEFORE AND AFTER MODIFICATION

INCINERATION PLANTS. Hazardous waste incineration Wastewater incineration Sewage sludge incineration. A Bayer and LANXESS company

Well Positioned for the Future

INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT FACTSHEET

Airborne Particulate Matter: Pollution Prevention and Control

Optimal Power Plant Integration of Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture. Dr. Tobias Jockenhövel Dr. Rüdiger Schneider Michael Sandell Lars Schlüter

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

Self Assessment Exercise

A pound of coal supplies enough electricity to power ten 100-watt light bulbs for about an hour.

Electricity Sources. Coal Fleet

SUBCHAPTER 2D - AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS SECTION 2D DEFINITIONS AND REFERENCES

POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY FIBERIGHT, LLC HAMPDEN, MAINE

SNOX flue gas treatment for boilers burning high-sulphur fuels

The Single Absorption Scrubbing Sulfuric Acid Process

Atlas Copco Quality Air Solutions. Compressed Air Filters

Reinhold Environmental APC Round Table and Expo. GE Energy

Marsa Thermal Treatment Facility Yearly Emissions Statement

A GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE BEST PRACTICABLE MEANS FOR ELECTRICITY WORKS BPM 7/1 (2014)

Coke Manufacturing. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Our Environmental Protection Plan RECYCLING CAPABILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Best Available Retrofit Technology Analysis Report

SMPS: Present Application & Future Investigation

Enhanced power and heat generation from biomass and municipal waste. Torsten Strand. Siemens Power Generation Industrial Applications

VALIDATION, MODELING, AND SCALE-UP OF CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION WITH OXYGEN UNCOUPLING

Biomass Renewable Energy from Plants and Animals

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Online Infrared Flue Gas Analyzer Gasboard 3000

S300 Series Dust Monitors

Improving Energy Efficiency through Biomass Drying

David Mezzacappa, P.E. SCS Engineers Contractor to U.S. EPA on LMOP

PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

University of Iowa Power Plant

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Optimization Design for Sulfur Dioxide Flow Monitoring Apparatus in Thermal Power Plants Hao-wei Hu 1, a, Xue Yang 1, b and Xiao-wei Song 1, c

MONITORING & MEASURING EQUIPMENT FOR EMISSIONS CONTROL, HAZARD DETECTION & ENERGY OPTIMIZATION

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Haldor Topsøe Catalysing Your Business

Description of Thermal Oxidizers

INCINERATION IN JAPAN

SMALL ENTITY COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR MAJOR SOURCE BOILERS AND PROCESS HEATERS

Guidelines on AIR POLLUTION CONTROL for. Joss Paper Burning at Chinese Temples, Crematoria and Similar Places

One united company. Advancing fire protection.

Commercial refrigeration has been in the environmental. Refrigerant. as a. Basics Considerations PART 1:

FURNACEPHOSPHORUS AND PHOSPHORICACID PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 52. July A private report by. the

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

Cooling Systems 2/18/2014. Cooling Water Systems. Jim Lukanich, CWT ChemCal, Inc. Grapevine, TX

Oasis Clearwater ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERS

Waste to Energy in Düsseldorf. for a clean city.

PHOENIX ENERGY of NEVADA, LLC (PENV) (PENV)

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Increasing Power Plant efficiency for safe wet stack Operation

Drying of Woody Biomass. Process Engineering / GEA Barr-Rosin

A Guide to Calculating Your Boiler Emissions. A step-by-step manual for your convenience

Application Note 12: TrendView Recorders Continuous Emissions Monitoring

Dentistry and the Environment

Process Heater Burners, Flare Systems, Thermal Oxidizers and Catalyst Systems. Combustion Technology

1. Introduction. 2. Concept. 3. Assumptions. 5. Conclusions

Transcription:

ENVIROENERGY SOLUTIONS Presentation of APC and Wet Electrostatic Precipitation Technology

Agenda Introduce participants Review WESP technology Review the Applications of WESP Questions & answers

People Enviroenergy Co. Dr. Isaac Ray Dr. Boris Altshuler Henry DelGatto Jacob Tsukerman P.E.

People Senior Consultant Dr. Isaac Ray Specializes in Electrostatic and Magnetic aspects of Aerosol Physics and its applications to APC equipment design Expertise in WESP technology Experience in US since 1977 and in former USSR since 1965 Ph.D Mechanical Engineering

People Dr. Boris Altshuler Senior Chemical and Process Consultant Worked extensively in air pollution control industry in the USA since 1990 and in Gas Industry in Russia since 1965 Specializes in Chemical Engineering Aspects of APC and related equipment design Ph.D. Chemical Engineering

Strengths Multiple Wet Technologies Integrated Approach Multi-Industry Experience Process Engineering Expertise Focus is on Difficult Applications Hundreds of Installations

ENVIROENERGY APC TECHNOLOGY Particulate Scrubbers Gas Absorbers Wet Electrostatic Precipitators Carbon Bed Adsorbers

Systems Benefits Up To 99.99% Collection Efficiency Low Pressure Drop Minimum Energy Usage Low Maintenance On-line Reliability

Project References (partial) Lucent Technologies Eastman Chemical Dupont International Technology Bechtel Wheeling-Pitt Steel Smurfit-Stone PCS Phosphates Shaw Industries Sierra Pine EPA Dept.of Defense General Electric Kyanite Mining M&M Mars International paper

Competitive Technologies Dry Scrubber ACI/Fabric Filter Wet Scrubber HCL Hg PM2.5 Metals X X X X X X Wet ESP X X X xx X

What is PM2.5? Particles, acid mists, liquid droplets, & toxic metals that are less than 2.5 microns in size PM2.5

What is a WESP? Developed by Dr. Cottrell in 1907 Originally Applied to Sulfuric Acid Mist production Used in Numerous Industrial Applications Since 1970 extensively used in Air Pollution Control Collection Surfaces Continuously Cleaned

Why Wet ESP Technology? High Removal Efficiency for PM2.5, Metals and SO3 Incremental Hg, SO2 & NOx Control Opacity reduction to < 5% Modular Design for Scale up Low Maintenance- no moving parts A Final Polishing Device Installed after course particulate & acid gas removed

Dry vs. Wet ESP Operating Parameter UNITS DRY ESP WET ESP PRECIPITATION RATE FT/SEC 0.05-1.00 0.15-2.00 SCA FT2/MCFM 50-1000 50-500 CORONA POWER WATTS/MCFM 50-500 500-3000 GAS VELOCITY FT/SEC 3-8 3-15+ OPERATIONAL ISSUES DRY ESP WET ESP BACK CORONA YES NO RE-ENTRAINMENT YES NO SO3 REMOVAL NO YES PM 2.5 REMOVAL NO YES MERCURY REMOVAL NO YES OPACITY REDUCTION NO YES WASTE WATER TREATMENT NO YES

PRECIPITATION PROCESS IONIZING ELECTRODE ELECTRON IONIZED GAS MOLECULE COLLECTED PARTICLE CORONA DISCHARGE COLLECTOR TUBE HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER ma CURRENT METER

Conventional WESP Configurations Horizontal Plate Type n Similar to Dry ESP Tubular Type n Vertical Down Flow n Vertical Up-flow Spray or liquid film Irrigated Condensing

The comparison of a tubular WESP vs. a plate type WESP shows that, for a given efficiency, a tubular WESP can operate at twice the velocity of a plate type WESP, resulting in a smaller footprint.

WESP Tube & Electrode

Horizontal Irrigated Plate WESP

WESP & TURBO-GRID SCRUBBER Vertical Tubular square tube WESP

Comparison of Technologies Dry Approach Dry Scrubber/Baghouse Higher pressure drop-filters Requires more fan capacity Doesn t cool gas-more volume Lower velocity Larger footprint Bags are pulsed-holes & blinding More Maintenance Dry waste by-product Larger volume of waste No water treatment required Higher capital cost Higher operating cost Wet Approach Wet Scrubber/Wet ESP Lower pressure drop-open design Less Fan capacity Cools Flue gas -reduces volume Higher velocity 8-12 ft/sec. Smaller Footprint No moving parts Less Maintenance Wet waste by-product Waste treated & concentrated Wastewater treated & recycled Less capital cost than baghouse Lower operating cost

Fiberboard Manufacturing

Carpet Manufacturing

Ore Roasting Application

Kyanite Mining-Test Results Pollutant Units Inlet Outlet Removal % SO2 Ppm 3580.07 21.4 99.4 ACID MIST gr /dscf 0.228 0.0159 93.0 (H2SO4) PM2.5 gr /dscf 1.6 0.006 99.6 NOx Ppm 41.1 21.5 47.7 CO Ppm 640.63 581.6 9.2 CONDENSED, Gr/dscf 0.13102 0.0143 89 INORGANIC CONDENSED, Gr/dscf 0.14148 0.01573 90 ORGANIC THC Ppm as 225.3 85.5 62 carbon Opacity <5%

Particle Board Manufacturing

Test Results - Hazardous Waste Incineration Pollutant Units Test Runs MACT Limits Particulate Gr/dscf, 7%O2 0.0024-0.0030 0.015 99.94 HCL/Cl2 ppmdv, 2.96-4.84 77 99.95 % Chromium Ug/dscm 39.7-42.8 97 99.97 Lead Ug/dscm 3.59-3.85 240 99.95 Mercury Ug/dscm 1.82-1.98 130 79% Dioxin/furan Ng TEQ/dscm 0.0131-0.0892 0.4 N/D

Opacity

Typical Performance for WESP Capable of removing particles as small as 0.1 micron with 99.9+% efficiency Equally as effective in removal of acid mist droplets, uncollected in scrubber Near perfect mist elimination minimizing droplet carryover

Design Factors Particulate or droplet concentration and size Velocity of the gas through the WESP Collection surface area WESP operating voltage and current

Pilot Wet ESP (FIRST ENERGY POWER PLANT IN PA)

Iso-Opacity Chart of Test Results Sep-01 Inlet PM2.5 67 mg/m 3 SO 3-11.5 5ppm Sep-01 Outlet PM2.5 14.4 mg/m 3 SO 3 2.7 ppm Nov-01 Inlet PM2.5-116mg/m 3 SO 3-10.1 ppm Nov-02 Outlet PM2.5-5mg/m 3 SO 3-2.9ppm Nov-02 Inlet PM2.5-115mg/m 3 SO 3-9.4ppm Nov-01 Outlet PM2.5-5 mg/m 3 SO 3-0.85 ppm

WESP- Observation Tube

WESP- Minimal Power

WESP- Power On

WESP- High Velocity, single Field

WESP- High Velocity - Two Field

Mercury Mercury -48 Tons Emitted (EPA ICR Data) Hg p- Particulate - 1.48 Tons Hg 2 -Oxidized -20.41 Tons Hg O Elemental -26.10 Tons Hg O - Is the Problem Remains as Vapor & passes through APC devices Activated Carbon w/baghouse Problems

Elemental Mercury Removal

Improvement of Scrubber s efficiency by liquid treatment

New Technologies for Mercury Control, Scrubbing & WESP Oxidation stage followed by high efficiency WESP Oxidation process within a WESP Reagent in the Scrubbing Liquid or the Gas Combining Scrubbing and WESP Process Improving the conventional scrubbing by the proprietary treatment of the scrubbing liquid Development of high velocity down flow WESP system with self cleaning capability and high efficiency of mist removal. Development of the WESP/ SCRUBBER constructed mostly from low cost plastics.

The Message ENVIROENERGY WESP is a proven technology for removal of PM2.5, Metals, H2SO4, etc. from combustion or any other process source flue gas WESP can provide multi-pollutant control in a single, integrated device WESP is the most cost-effective solution for compliance with the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulation

Wet ESP Markets Focus Industrial Utility HIGH Prospects Driver Boiler MACT Industrial Boilers burning wood, oil, or coal over 10mmBTU EPA Boiler MACT Standard Hybrid dry-wet ESP Coal-fired utilities plants with dry ESPs 50-200MW in size State Opacity Limits HIGH Process Industries FGD Application Prospects Driver industries such as textile, mining, plastics, steel, pulp & paper etc. EPA MACT standards State Regulations Coal-fired utilities with FGD or planning to install FGD EPA Acid Rain, Mercury & PM2.5 Standards

WHAT TO REMEMBER ABOUT THE WESP PROCESS ELECTROSTATIC TECHNOLOGY FOR REMOVAL OF THE SOLID PARTICLES AND LIQUID DROPLETS FROM THE MOVING GAS STREAM IS THE ONLY TECHNOLOGY THAT DOES NOT INFLUENCE THE GAS MOVEMENT BUT APPLYING THE REMOVAL FORCE DIRECTLY ON THE PARTICLE. WET ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR (WESP) IS THE ONLY DEVICE ON THE MARKET THAT IS CAPABLE OF REMOVING MOST OF THE POLUTANTS IN THE SINGLE DEVICE WITH EFFICIENCY CLOSE TO 100%. BY REPLACING THE HIGH ENERGY VENTURI SCRUBBER WITH THE WESP THE PAY-BACK IS LESS THAN TWO YEARS AND AFTER THAT THE WESP BECOMES A MONEY MAKER FOR THE CLIENT PROVIDING DRAMATICK ENERGY SAVINGS

WHAT TO REMEMBER FOR THE WESP SALE PROCESS (CONT.) ENVIROENERGY PROPRIETARY PATENT PENDING WESP TECHNOLOGY IS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL BENEFITS FOR THE CLIENT INSURING TOTAL REMOVAL OF THE POLLUTANTS WITH 100% INCREASE OF THE ON LINE RELABILITY REGARDLESS OF THE PROCESS SWINGS. UNLIKE OTHER VENDORS THAT ARE PROVIDING ONLY ONE AVAILIBLE TO THEM WESP DESIGN, THAT IS NOT ALLWAYS IS THE BEST FOR THE APPLICATION ENVIROENERGY IS CURRENTLY PROVIDING UP FLOW, DOWN FLOW, DUAL FLOW AND CONDENSING WESP S WITH HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND ROUND TUBES AND CONDENSATION CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY LIQUID OR AIR COOLING AROUND THE COLLECTING TUBES.

WHAT TO REMEMBER FOR THE WESP SALE PROCESS (CONT.) ENVIROENERGY IS CAPABLE TO DELIVER THE WESP SYSTEM ON THE TURN-KEY BASIS INCLUDING THE ZERO LIQUID DISCHARGE FOR WATER TREATMENT THAT IS VITALLY IMPORTANT FOR THE WESP OPERATION AND USUALLY IS REQUIRED BY THE CLIENT. THE COMBINED EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF THE WET ESP AND WET SCRUBBING FOR THE KEY TECHNICAL PERSONNELL (MECHANICAL, CHEMICAL AND ELECTRICAL) AMOUNTS TO 120 YEARS. ENVIROENERGY KEY WESP PERSONNEL HAS MORE U.S. PATENTS AND TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF WESP THAN ALL OTHER VENDORS COMBINED.

ENVROENERGY SUPERIOR ELEMENTS OF THE WESP (PARTIAL LIST) IONIZING ELECTRODES ARE CUSTOM DESIGNED FOR EACH JOB AND ARE OF RIGID SOLID STEEL CONSTRUCTION PROVIDING UP TO THREE TIMES MORE DENSITY OF ELCTRICAL FIELD THAN ANY COMPETING DESIGN. INSULATOR COMPARTMENTS HAVE DOUBLE PROTECTION FROM THE CONTAMINATION AND EQUIPPED WITH INDIVIDUAL SMALL ESP S COMPUTERISED SIZING OF THE WESP AND RELATED HIGH VOLTAGE EQUIPMENT IS INSURING THE LONG LASTING HIGH EFFICINCY OPERATION REGARDLESS OF THE CHANGES IN THE GAS COMPOSITION AND PROCESS CONDITIONS.