DVB-T2, T2-Lite and DVB-NGH: Second and third generation DVB terrestrial broadcasting standards. Erik Stare KTH 2013-03-20



Similar documents
DVB-T2 in relation to the DVB-x2 Family of Standards

BENEFITS OF USING MULTIPLE PLP IN DVB-T2

PLANNING DVB-T2 Advance and Challenge

Delivery Technologies and Business Models for Mobile Television Services 2015

what s new on DVB-T2?

CNR Requirements for DVB-T2 Fixed Reception Based on Field Trial Results

ATSC 3.0 Mobile Support. Luke Fay

AN INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL MODULATION

Keysight Technologies DVB-T and DVB-T2 Receiver Test Challenges. Application Note

RESULTS OF TESTS WITH DOMESTIC RECEIVER IC S FOR DVB-T. C.R. Nokes BBC R&D, UK ABSTRACT

Mobile Digital TV (DVB-H/SH) and 2 nd Generation DVB Systems (DVB-S2/C2/T2)

ISDB-T T Transmission Technologies and Emergency Warning System

MEDIA TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION. General issues to be considered when planning SFNs

A STUDY ON DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING TO A HANDHELD DEVICE (DVB-H), OPERATING IN UHF BAND

ISDB-T Digital terrestrial broadcasting in Japan

TR 036 TV PROGRAMME ACCOMMODATION IN A DVB-T2 MULTIPLEX FOR (U)HDTV WITH HEVC VIDEO CODING TECHNICAL REPORT VERSION 1.0

Technical Overview of Single Frequency Network

The Analysis of DVB-C signal in the Digital Television Cable Networks

COMPATIBILITY AND SHARING ANALYSIS BETWEEN DVB T AND RADIO MICROPHONES IN BANDS IV AND V

Chapter 6: Broadcast Systems. Mobile Communications. Unidirectional distribution systems DVB DAB. High-speed Internet. architecture Container

New Technology DVB-T2 Products from GatesAir

Implementing Digital Wireless Systems. And an FCC update

1-MINIMUM REQUIREMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DVB-T SET-TOP-BOXES RECEIVERS (STB) FOR SDTV

New markets HEVC DVB T2 Germany. Herbert Tillmann

4 Digital Video Signal According to ITU-BT.R.601 (CCIR 601) 43

IRD GUIDELINES FOR THE DVB-T (S) PLATFORM AUSTRIA. Profile. Zapping. Released. Version 1.0 Zapping IRD_Guidelines_Zapping_V10.

Why and how Germany is going HEVC! Herbert Tillmann

DVB-T BER MEASUREMENTS IN THE PRESENCE OF ADJACENT CHANNEL AND CO-CHANNEL ANALOGUE TELEVISION INTERFERENCE

Addressing the Challenges of Deploying Single Frequency Networks DVB-T & DVB-T2. Application Note

International co-ordination of DVB-T frequencies in Europe

DVB-T and DVB-T2 Transmitter Test Challenges

THE FUTURE OF TERRESTRIAL BROADCASTING IN TURKEY. DigiTAG 19th General Assembly 17th December 2014 EBU Headquarters GENEVA

The role of terrestrial DVB standards in broadcast / mobile broadband integration

Measurements on MPEG2 and DVB-T signals (1)

DAB Digital Radio Broadcasting. Dr. Campanella Michele

Study on the Comparison of the Transmitting Power between DRM+ and DAB/DAB+ in VHF Band III to Cover the same Service Area

The new standard for customer entertainment

Overview ISDB-T for sound broadcasting Terrestrial Digital Radio in Japan. Shunji NAKAHARA. NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation)

New TV Technologies for Science Education. A.K. Bhatnagar Chief Engineer Doordarshan

Michael Kornfeld and Ulrich Reimers Institute for Communications Technology, Technische Universität Braunschweig

Introduzione alle reti DVB-H

DVB-T/H Field Measurements MS2721B Spectrum Master MT8222A BTS Master

Digital Satellite Broadcasting and HDTV Services in Japan

MyM 3T. User Manual. English

Understanding DVB-T2. Key technical, business, & regulatory implications. Digital Terrestrial Television Action Group.

DVB-C2 a new Transmission System for Hybrid Fibre Coax Networks

TV & SATELLITE LEVEL METERS

istock.com / alengo Broadcast and media Focus

Keysight Technologies DVB-T and DVB-T2 Transmitter Test Challenges. Application Note

MINIMUM TECHNICAL AND EXPLOITATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DIGITAL SOUND BROADCASTING DAB+ RECEIVER DESIGNED FOR POLAND

MODULATION Systems (part 1)

MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS FOR DAB AND DAB+ IN-VEHICLE DIGITAL RADIO RECEIVERS AND ADAPTORS

AIR DRM. DRM+ Showcase

Technical Overview & Transmission System of ISDB-T

Digital Video Broadcasting By Satellite

Exercise 2 Common Fundamentals: Multiple Access

Assessment of LTE 800 MHz Base Station Interference into DTT Receivers

DELIVERABLE D11-PART 3 - DVB-T2 NETWORK PLANNING

PROTECTION OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICE FROM BROADCASTING SATELLITE SERVICE TRANSMISSIONS IN THE BAND MHz

Main Ways to Enhance Throughput

5 in 1 DVB-T Transmitter & Dual Cast Agile Digital Transposer TV EQUIPMENT

Introduction to Clean-Slate Cellular IoT radio access solution. Robert Young (Neul) David Zhang (Huawei)

Minimum Requirements for DVB-T2 Devices in Germany

Digital transmission 10.1 Introduction

Accommodation of HDTV in the GE06 Plan

SC-FDMA for 3GPP LTE uplink. Hong-Jik Kim, Ph. D.

Digital Audio and Video Broadcasting Antenna Components and Systems

Voice services over Adaptive Multi-user Orthogonal Sub channels An Insight

MoCA 1.1 Specification for Device RF Characteristics

DVB-T2: An Update from the UK Rollout

Radio TV Forum 2014 Rohde & Schwarz Solutions

Mel Whitten, KØPFX.

Interference from future mobile network services in frequency band MHz to digital TV in frequencies below 790 MHz.

Next Generation DTV: ATSC 3.0

Alberto Morello and Vittoria Mignone RAI, Radiotelevisione Italiana

RF Measurements. in DVB-T and DVB-H

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. LAB 1 - Introduction to USRP

HD Radio FM Transmission System Specifications Rev. F August 24, 2011

LTE Evolution for Cellular IoT Ericsson & NSN

INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND TRANSMISSION MEDIA

EN V1.1.2 ( )

QAM Demodulation. Performance Conclusion. o o o o o. (Nyquist shaping, Clock & Carrier Recovery, AGC, Adaptive Equaliser) o o. Wireless Communications

This high-performance TV signal analyzer provides analog/digital TV and satellite TV monitoring and provides various video decoding.

Local and Ultra Local Content in Broadcast Mobile TV

GTER 26 tudo o que você. quer saber sobre n

DVB-T/T2 signal parameters measurement, generation of 3D TV transport stream

DTU-315 All-Standard All-Band Modulator for USB-3

EVALUATION OF A DVB-T COMPLIANT DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION SYSTEM

MIMO Antenna Systems in WinProp

RSPG public consultation related to the draft opinion on EU spectrum policy implications of the digital dividend.

Terrestrial Media Delivery Beyond DVB-T2

TECHNICAL CODE SPECIFICATIONS ON COMMON TEST SUITE FOR DIGITAL TERRESTRIAL TELEVISION BROADCAST SERVICE RECEIVER MCMC MTSFB TC T011:2014

Characteristics of terrestrial IMT-Advanced systems for frequency sharing/ interference analyses

Hierarchical. modulation. 1. Principles of DVB-T and hierarchical modulation Parameters of DVB-T

DVB-S2 and DVB-RCS for VSAT and Direct Satellite TV Broadcasting

BROADCAST Trasmettitori / Transmitters DBH3 GAP FILLER

Signal-400 HDMI COFDM (DVB-T) Encoder & Modulator. --- Home Use

DVB-T. The echo performance of. receivers. Theory of echo tolerance. Ranulph Poole BBC Research and Development

Transcription:

DVB-T2, T2-Lite and DVB-NGH: Second and third generation DVB terrestrial broadcasting standards Erik Stare KTH 2013-03-20

What does Teracom do?

We use terrestrial transmitters

often at 300 m height

to allow for roof-top reception of digital TV and in many cases in-door reception We also transmit FM radio and in the future digital radio

Transmitter sites all over Sweden cover almost all population (>99.8%) 54 Main transmitter sites 520 small transmitter sites

We offer Tv Radio Capacity Co-location Service Future-proofed products that are constantly evolving

We are located throughout Sweden FM coverage TV coverage Backbone network

Some of our customers Sveriges Television TV4 Boxer Viasat Eurosport NT Media Sveriges Radio UR Radio Sweden MTG Radio SBS Radio Telenor Sverige 3GIS Tele2 3 TeliaSonera Nokia Siemens Net 1

The Teracom group Holding company Sweden Denmark Sweden Denmark Finland Network operator Terrestrial broadcast Pay-TV operator Digital Terrestrial TV

Teracom Sweden 450 employees Offices in Stockholm and Sundsvall Service organization from Ystad to Kiruna

Which are the big TV actors in Sweden? Satellite Satellite Terrestrial Cable IPTV Network operator ComHem Service Provider ComHem CA, SMS ComHem Content Terrestrial network - Reaches all Sweden (>99.8%) - Unique combination of free-to-air and pay TV - Simplicity is the keyword - High degree of regionalisation of content

Market shares Distribution TV Distribution of TV IPTV 6% Cable 39% Terrestrial 32% SMATV 1% Main reception type in the home Individuals in Sweden 3-99 år Many can receive TV in different ways Other 1% Satellite 21% IPTV and digital cable increasing Source: Mediavision, MMS Basundersökning Q2 2010 Terrestrial is dominating for summer cottages (Sv: fritidshus) more than 80%

Teracom s Digital Terrestrial TV Network

Spectrum for Digital Terrestrial TV UHF band IV/V channel 21-60: 470-790 MHz VHF band III, channel 5-12: 174-230 MHz UHF band IV/V 21 22 23 58 59 60 470 MHz 790 MHz 8 MHz frequency VHF band III 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 174 MHz 230 MHz 7 MHz frequency

DVB-T and DVB-T2 DVB-T was the first emission standard for digital terrestrial TV Possible to choose trade-off between capacity and C/N (C/I) performance Used in mux 1-5 Capacity = 22.1 Mbit/s with same coverage as analogue TV DVB-T2 is based on DVB-T but with a lot of new functionality DVB-T2 allows for about 50% higher capacity than DVB-T for the same coverage Mux 6: 36.6 Mbit/s Mux 7: 30.8 Mbit/s

Key facts Teracom digital TV Mux 1 (SDTV/DVB-T) 99,8 % population coverage (SVT) Mux 2-5 (SDTV/DVB-T) 98% population coverage Mux 6-7 (HDTV/DVB-T2) 98% population coverage Main transmitter sites 54 (Mux 1-5) Small transmitter sites 102 st (Mux 1-5) Additional sites for SVT 418 st (Mux 1) Allows for regional services in a large number of areas E.g. local news and local advertising Most of the sites also transmit radio

Very short tutorial about digital terrestrial TV

Simplified transmission chain for digital terrestrial TV MPEG-2 TS RF ( air interface ) Uncompressed video Video coding Uncompressed audio Audio coding Mux Modulation Channel Decompressed video Decompressed audio Video decoding Audio decoding Demux Demodulation

Constant and variable bit rate How efficient the bit rate reduction can be depends on a number of factors, e.g. how difficult the material is Because the criticality of the material varies over time one gets the following relations: With constant bit rate (CBR) the quality varies over time With constant quality one gets a variable bit rate (VBR) None of these are desirable! Picture quality, Q CBR Picture quality, Q VBR tid tid B, bit rate Q, Subjective picture quality

Statistical multiplexing With statistical multiplexing one can ideally combine a large number of VBR video services to a stream that has both constant bit rate and a constant video quality Capacity Mbit/s Service Information, CA, bootloading etc TV service 4 TV service 3 TV service 2 TV service 1 Time

Multiplexing The result of the audio/video coding is put in so-called MPEG-2 Transport Stream packets (TS packets) The multiplexing operation assembles TS packets from different services to one single data stream the MPEG-2 Transport Stream (MPEG-2 TS) One colour per service component (e.g. video of SVT2 or audio of SVT1 ) This stream is broadcast over the air by the modulator/transmitter and is demultiplexed by the receiver 188 byte = 188 x 8 bits per TS packet TS packet 1 TS packet 2 TS packet 3

Modulation MPEG-2 TS Constant bit rate RF signal UHF: 8 MHz (ch.21-60) VHF: 7MHz (ch. 5-12) Uncompressed video Video coding DVB-T or DVB-T2 Uncompressed audio Audio coding Mux Modulation Channel Decompressed video Decompressed audio Video decoding Audio decoding Demux Demodulation

DVB-T2

The DVB-T2 standard Driver: Need for more capacity for HDTV services DVB approved the DVB-T2 specification in June 2008 specifies the physical layer of the air interface (like DVB-T) does not address receiver requirements Video coding and multiplexing not included but will for digital TV/HDTV services be MPEG-4 AVC (H.264) over MPEG-2 TS ETSI standard September 2009 DVB/ETSI standards/documents related to DVB-T2 Main DVB-T2 standard, Ref: ETSI EN 302 755 v.1.2.1 (draft v.1.3.1) DVB-T2 Modulator Interface (T2-MI), Ref: ETSI TS 102 773 Implementation Guidelines, Ref: ETSI TR 102 831 Transmitter identification in SFNs (TX-SIG), Ref: ETSI TS 102 992 ETSI standards freely downloadable from ETSI: http://pda.etsi.org/pda/queryform.asp

power spectrum density DVB-T och DVB-T2 use OFDM Representation of OFDM in the time-frequency plane db 10 0-10 OFDM spectrum -20-30 -40 2 k mode -50 8 k mode -60-8 -7-6 -5-4 -3-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 frequency relative to centre frequency f MHz c

DVB-T2 builds on DVB-T OFDM based (thousends of orthogonal carriers) Same basic OFDM parameters as DVB-T FFT size Guard interval Pilot patterns But also many new values Many other additions and improvements A lot of the signal processing in the receiver is similar to DVB-T Chips/receivers can be developed faster thanks to reuse of knowledge and experience from DVB-T From an HW point of view simple to have both DVB-T2 and DVB-T on the same chip (DVB-T comes for free) T2 receivers also support DVB-T

Bandwidths and frequency bands The DVB-T2 specification as such does not specify any frequency band The system is primarily optimised for UHF band IV/V (470-862 MHz), but also VHF band III (174-230 MHz), L-band (1.5 GHz) and even higher frequencies are expected to work well Flexible system parameters allow use within a very wide frequency range Specified channel bandwidths (channel raster): 8 MHz (typically UHF band IV/V) 7 MHz (typicallyvhf band III) 1.7 MHz (same as DAB): typically VHF band III och L-band) 6 MHz (e.g. USA and Japan) 5 MHz Also a 10 MHz mode for non-consumer use

Symbol time (FFT size) and guard interval With DVB-T2 the symbol time can be increased by a factor two (16K FFT) and four (32K FFT) compared to DVB-T Reduces the overhead due to guard interval for a given size of guard interval (size of SFN) increased capacity GI 8K-symbol 25% overhead in DVB-T with maximum guard interval GI 32K-symbol ~6% overhead in DVB-T2 Increases possible guard interval size and therefore size of SFN for a given percentage GI overhead potentially more efficient frequency plan DVB-T2 may also use the same symbol periods as DVB-T (8K, 4K, 2K) and also a shorter FFT size (1K) allows for flexibility for different frequency bands, network types and flexibilitet för olika frekvensband, RF bandwidths, network types and reception

More flexibility in the choice of guard interval fraction T2 extends the set of allowed GI fractions with three more increased flexibility and reduced overhead: 1/128, 1/32, 1/16, 19/256, 1/8, 19/128, 1/4 Allows for optimisation of guard interval to the actual network (e.g. transmitter spacing and network size) maximises capacity

Flexibility in pilot pattern DVB-T has a fixed pattern of scattered pilot cells DVB-T2 has 8 different patterns to choose from, depending on network type and reception conditions Minimises pilot overhead

Modulation T2 has a 256-QAM mode Carries 8 bits per data cell (6 bits/data cell for 64-QAM) Allows for 33% larger capacity The T2 standard also includes 64-QAM 16-QAM QPSK inherited from DVB-T

Rotated constellation Additional modulation stage with socalled Rotated Constellation allows for more robust reception in extreme radio environments E.g. lots of echoes, part of the signal totally faded or interfered Each constellation point gets unique projection on both u1 and u2 axes Interleaving separates u1 and u2 values over the air increased diversity

0 db echo totally kills some carriers 10 0 Single path (0 db) RX -10-20 TX1-30 TX2-40 -50-60 -70 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Erik Stare/3/21/201 3/35

Forward Error Correction (FEC) DVB-T has a convolutional code + Reed-Solomon DVB-T2 has an LDPC code + BCH code Same as in DVB-S2 (satellite) and DVB-C2 (cable) Iterative decoding of LDPC, iterative demapping also possible 6 code rates: 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5, 5/6 Flexibility to make desired trade-off between capacity and robustness Allows for about 30% more capacity for a given robustness FEC block size (N ldpc ): 64800 bits or 16200 bits N bch = K ldpc K bch N bch -K bch N ldpc -K ldpc BBFRAME BCHFEC LDPCFEC (N ldpc bits)

Interleaving Interleaving is of fundamental importance for the RF performance on non-awgn channels DVB-T2 has several interleavers Bit interleaver within a FEC block Cell interleaver within a FEC block Time interleaving within a PLP (e.g. one TV program) Frequency interleaving within an OFDM symbol The result is that bit errors caused by the channel are equally distributed among the FEC blocks, and also within FEC blocks maximises error correction ability of the LDPC/BCH code

Interleavning in DVB-T and DVB-T2 Time FEC FEC FEC FEC FEC FEC K min =0.............................. TPS pilots and continual pilots between K min and K max are not indicated K min =0 boosted pilot data.............................. TPS pilots and continual pilots between K min and K max are not indicated boosted pilot data DVB-T DVB-T2 K max = 1 704 if 2K K max = 6 816 if 8K K max = 1 704 if 2K K max = 6 816 if 8K Single erased OFDM-symbol Bit errors Single erased OFDM-symbol Can be corrected! Erik Stare/3/21/201 3/38

Extended bandwidth mode Transmitted spectrum falls-off much faster with 32K mode than with the 2K mode (used today for DVB-T in the UK) Allows 2% additional bandwidth/capacity, while keeping spectrum mask requirements The standard also allows a normal mode, without extended bandwidth

Capacity increase DVB-T2 allows for typically about 50% higher capacity for fixed reception than DVB-T (for a given coverage) Exact increase depends on precise configuration of T2 parameters Example: DVB-T today in Sweden: 22 Mbit/s on UHF (8 MHz bandwidth) DVB-T2 can provide about 33 Mbit/s (+50%) on UHF with the same basic coverage as DVB-T Capacity on VHF somewhat lower VHF bandwidth is 7 MHz VHF has larger SFN areas requires a larger guard interval However, VHF has a better link budget may be possible to increase code rate/capacity Exact capacity depends on transmitter power

Effective bits per Cell Performance for modulation and FEC close to theoretical limits Capacity Performance Capacity limits for a channel with white noise (AWGN) With LDPC coding T2 can come close to the theoretical limit 10,00 9,00 8,00 7,00 6,00 Typically a 30% gain in capacity compared to DVB-T for a given required C/N 5,00 4,00 3,00 2,00 1,00 0,00 0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0 C/N DVB-T2 QPSK DVB-T2 16-QAM DVB-T2 64-QAM DVB-T2 256-QAM Shannon Limit BICM Limit

Improved robustness DVB-T does not include time interleaving and is therefore sensitive to impulsive interference and time varying channels DVB-T2 has support for deep time interleaving and longer symbol period (32K FFT), which together radically improve the robustness against impulsive interference Time interleaving also allows for much better performance in time varying channels The type of FEC (LDPC) and modulation (rotated constellation) that T2 has also allows for much better RF performance in difficult radio environments

Physical Layer Pipes (PLPs) Input MPEG-2 TSs are carried by the corresponding Physical Layer Pipe (PLP) The stream carried in a PLPs may have a variable bit rate Statistical multiplexing over several PLPs is possible Every PLP can get its own robustness (code rate + modulation) PLPs may be sent in a bursty way allows for power saving in mobile devices ( time slicing ) Signalling data which is common for several PLPs may be sent in a dedicated PLP ( Common PLP ) to avoid duplication/overhead

Future Extension Frames (FEFs) A mechanism that allows a future system to be sent as Future Extension frames in T2 time slots No restrictions in the allowed content of the FEF FEF may use DVB-T2 Lite (specified subset of DVB-T2) Will e.g. allow future transmission of the DVB Next Generation Handheld (DVB-NGH) standard currently developed by DVB The FEF mechanism does not exist in DVB-T Allows flexible capacity allocation to fixed and mobile services by adjusting the size of T2 frame and FEF T2-Lite or DVB-NGH frame T2-Lite or DVB-NGH frame T2 FEF T2 T2 FEF T2 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1

Summary of advantages with DVB-T2 About 50% more capacity than DVB-T for a given coverage More robust reception in difficult reception conditions May be used on VHF and in large SFNs Several different ways of allowing different kinds of reception using the same transmitted signal Very large flexibility and a lot of features Opens the door for further performance improvements via the use of Time Frequency Slicing

Worldwide Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcast standards (updated mid 2012)

T2-Lite

T2-Lite The commercial focus on DVB-T2 was originally mainly on stationary reception, but DVB-T2 is also designed to work well in mobile/handheld conditions deep time interleaving supports power saving by time slicing enables the introduction of T2-Lite or DVB-NGH services via Future Extension Frames (FEF) T2-Lite is part of the DVB-T2 standard (from v.1.3.1) DVB-NGH is based on DVB-T2

Development of DVB standards DVB-T3? (201x) DVB- NGH (2013) DVB-S2 (2005) DVB-C2 (2010) DVB-T2 (2009) T2-Lite (2012) DVB-S (1994) DVB-C (1994) DVB-T (1997) DVB-H (2004)

What is T2-Lite? T2-Lite is a light version of DVB-T2 that allows for implementation of of mobile devices with low complexity and low power consumption T2-Lite is mainly a subset of the main DVB-T2 standard (T2-Base), where components with high complexity are removed T2-Lite is specified in an updated version of the DVB-T2 standard was published by ETSI in 2012 (EN 302 755 v.1.3.1) Entire DVB-T2 standard DVB-T2 (T2-Base) T2-Lite

Differences between T2-Lite och T2- Base T2-Lite has e.g. the following restrictions: TS bit rate limited to 4 Mbit/s Half the time interleaving memory No 64K FEC-block (only 16K) ¼ of the LDPC memory Marginally lower C/N performance No 1K or 32K FFT (but 2K-4K-8K-16K kept) T2-Lite also has some extensions, such as: Code rates 1/3 and 2/5 are added

Future Extension Frames (FEFs) The T2 signal may include time slots where other systems (including future) may be transmitted FEF may contain arbitrary waveform FEF may consist of T2-Lite or DVB-NGH (or DVB-T3 in the future) T2-Lite or DVB-NGH frame T2-Lite or DVB-NGH frame T2 FEF T2 T2 FEF T2 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 Example: Optimised for roof-top reception (high capacity) 32K FFT 256-QAM 8K FFT QPSK 15-20 db difference in required C/N Optimised for mobile reception (high robustness/mobility)

RF-signal = T2-signal + T2-Lite-signal T2 T2 T2 T2 T2 FEF T2 FEF tid + T2-Lite FEF T2- Lite T2-Lite FEF T2- Lite T2-Lite FEF tid = T2- T2 T2 T2 T2 Lite T2- Lite P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1

Combinations with WiFi In-door reception can be done directly with a T2- Lite receiver or with a combined T2-Lite/WiFiextender WiFi-extender receives via T2-Lite and retransmits over IP/WiFi T2-Lite reception via roof-top antenna or window antenna IP/WiFi retransmission allows reception on normal smartphones and tablets (e.g. ipad) without any dedicated T2-Lite support This type of product already exists (e.g. Legato) Reception outdoor or in vehicles can be done directly or with vehicle-mounted WiFi-extender that retransmits within the vehicle (e.g. cars, buses, trains) mobile WiFi-extender (carried e.g. in the pocket, but needs charging) T2-Lite dongel connected to e.g. tablet (powered from tablet)

DVB-NGH

DVB-Next Generation Handheld (DVB-NGH) Addresses handheld & mobile reception Designed for state-of-the-art performance while keeping complexity limited Main new technologies compared to DVB-T2: Time Frequency Slicing (TFS), using a single tuner MIMO (X-polar) Non-uniform QAM Also adds an optional satellite component Standard approved by DVB in 2012 Planned ETSI standardisation in 2013

Time Frequency Slicing (TFS) With TFS several RF frequencies are used from each site as a common resource for a super multiplex, where each service is jumping between several RF frequencies Statmux gain Network planning gain (focus here) Coverage of all services depends on the average C/N of the muxes rather than the C/N of the worst multiplex 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RF 3 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 RF 2 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 RF 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Network planning gains with TFS Network planning gain w.r.t. the wanted signal Homogenous and improved coverage for a group of multiplexes (3-4 db gain) Network planning gain w.r.t. interference Higher robustness against frequency-dependent interference C/I variations expected to be larger than C/N variations across multiplexes TFS interference gain larger than TFS coverage gain A higher interference immunity can allows a fundamentally higher spectral efficiency Higher capacity per network, or fewer used frequencies per network ( more networks in a given total spectrum) More Mbit/s per used MHz -55-57 -59-61 Level -63 (dbm) -65-67 -69-71 -73-75 0 2 4 6 8 10 distance (m) 706 MHz 730 MHz 746 MHz 754 MHz 778 MHz

Cross-polarisation 2x2 MIMO MIMO = Multiple Input Multiple Output Horisontal and vertical polarisation are used at the same time from the same transmitter and frequency Requires reception with a X-polar antenna Receiver may use inversion of matrix h, but better methods exist MIMO precoding improves performance ( esm + PH in NGH) MIMO can potentially double the capacity H H V V

Non-uniform constellations Approaching Shannon capacity requires the transmittted samples to have a Gaussian distribution This is not possible with uniform QAM of any size Assuming equiprobable constellation points Fundamental 1.53 db (pi/6) shaping loss with uniform QAM With non-uniform QAM the amplitude distribution becomes closer to Gaussian High order NU-QAM constellations may approach Shannon capacity closely (assuming ideal coding) NU-1024-QAM In NGH NU-64-QAM and NU-256-QAM are used

DVB-T3 (?)

DVB-T3? Currently DVB conducts a technical Study Mission to estimate the performance potential of MIMO and other new technologies for fixed roof-top reception with a directional antenna Hot candidates are cross-polar MIMO, TFS and NU-QAM MIMO gain higher for fixed roof-top reception Large potential gains using TFS In addition new generation video coding (HEVC) brings another factor 2 gain Unclear if/when DVB-T3 will be standardised and implemented

Summary: 1st, 2nd & 3rd generation DVB standards DVB-T3? (201x) DVB- NGH (2013) DVB-S2 (2005) DVB-C2 (2010) DVB-T2 (2009) T2-Lite (2012) DVB-S (1994) DVB-C (1994) DVB-T (1997) DVB-H (2004)

Thank you! Any questions? (erik.stare@teracom.se)