Instructional Technology Initiative Task Force: Vision, Mission, & Core Values



Similar documents
Kentucky. Guidelines. Digital Learning. Kentucky Department of Education. Dr. Terry Holliday, Commissioner

DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS. EduStat Case Study. Denver Public Schools: Making Meaning of Data to Enable School Leaders to Make Human Capital Decisions

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Classified Performance Management. Advisory Committee Meeting May 23, 2011

How To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District

REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION JUNE

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

CULTIVATING EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE. Strategic Plan

ON THE SAME PAGE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS THROUGH LABOR-MANAGEMENT COLLABORATION

Cosimo Tangorra, Jr. Update on School Counseling Regulations SUMMARY

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT reference guide

Curriculum Management

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Superintendent Effectiveness Rubric*

Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders

The Leader in K 12 Professional Development

Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

Achieve your professional goals with customized professional learning.

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Educational Technology Plan. for Albemarle County Public Schools.

Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES

San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco County Office of Education Master Plan for Educational Technology DRAFT May 22, 2012

Teacher Career Ladders and Leadership Roles. Examples and Lessons Learned July 2014

Texas Principal Evaluation and Support System FAQ

HALIFAX REGIONAL SCHOOL BOARD Creating Conditions to Support Student Success in our Priority Schools

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics

Bridging Theory and Practice: Lessons from Clinical Teacher Education programs in the U.S. Jesse Solomon Executive Director BPE

Garden City Public Schools Strategic Plan. Vision: Student Focused Team Driven Globally Competitive with a Hometown Spirit

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

Developing 21 st Century Skills through Competency Based Expanded Learning Opportunities

USING DATA TO INFORM INSTRUCTION AND PERSONALIZE LEARNING

Self Assessment. Orange County Public Schools. Dr. Barbara Jenkins, Superintendent 445 W Amelia St Orlando, FL

WIDA ELD Standards Implementation in Boston Public Schools

Strategic Plan Every Student: College and Career Ready. Strong Students Strong Schools Strong Staff Strong System

Cobb Keys School Counselor Evaluation System Performance Rubric with Examples of School Counselor Evidence

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Maine DOE Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Model

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

WV School Counseling Program Audit

Principal Appraisal Overview

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

DRAFT For use in validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

Covington Community Schools Innovative Technology Finalized Planning Grant Report

PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION

Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Ritchie Program for School Leaders & Executive Leadership for Successful Schools (ELSS)

Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO

A Blueprint for Transforming Philadelphia s Public Schools. Safe, high-quality schools. Fiscal sustainability.

Instructional Technology Standards Proposed by the GaPSC Instructional Technology Task Force December 2010

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS S) and Performance Indicators for Students 1. Creativity and Innovation

How To Teach Authentic Learning

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

UTAH. ESEA Flexibility Request

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents

Conceptual Framework. A. Overview and Conceptual framework

Code.org District Partnership Model

What is Quality Schools Development? Why are we doing this?

TECHNOLOGY PLAN

William S. Hutchings College & Career Academy STRATEGIC SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Educational Leadership Program Standards. ELCC Revised Standards

Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

Multi-Year Communications Plan

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

How To Improve Education Planning In Dekalb County Schools

The ASCA National Model: A Framework for School Counseling Programs. Program Audit

Standard 1 INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: SPED Coordinator is a World Class instructional leader.

North Carolina New Schools Design Principle 1: Ready for College. Beginning Early Steps Growing Innovations New Paradigms

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

2014/2015 ACADEMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE. 1) List report card areas where your school received D or F grades.

Charles A. Szuberla, Jr.

THE FOUR NON NEGOTIABLES

Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

Pennsylvania Department of Education

Adopted March 2010 ESEA REAUTHORIZATION PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS. A Policy Statement of the Council of Chief State School Officers

Best Practices for Implementing a Comprehensive Online/Blended Learning

WV School Counseling Program Audit

Transcription:

Instructional Technology Initiative Task Force: Vision, Mission, & Core Values Our Vision: All schools use technology as a tool to differentiate and personalize instruction, increase academic rigor, and build student ownership of learning using a portfolio of student-centered school models. Our Mission: To prepare all students to be digital learners who use technology as a tool to graduate ready for success in college and careers. Core Values That Drive Our Mission: 1. Differentiated and Personalized Teaching and Learning: Teachers use adaptive and non-adaptive digital content and provide differentiated tasks, pathways, and playlists for student learning. 2. Data-Driven Decisions That Support Mastery-Based Learning: Teachers use technology to check for understanding and inform individual student grouping and instructional strategies. 3. Integrated Digital Content and Learning Tools: Teachers and students use technology and digital media strategically and capably. 4. Students as Creators and Producers: Students transfer knowledge by producing artifacts. Students move beyond consumption of information towards creation and production. 5. Student Agency and Ownership of Learning: Teachers prepare students to use technology and digital media strategically and capably. 6. Commitment to Ongoing Improvement: Students, educators, parents, and the community revise the instructional technology program based on its results and the evolving technology. 1

Instructional Technology Initiative Task Force Purpose The task force is an advisory group that will provide recommendations for a three-year strategic plan to guide instructional technology integration in the Los Angeles Unified School District. The task force recommendations will be reviewed and synthesized into a formal draft strategic plan, which will be submitted to the District superintendent. After the superintendent s review, a final proposed strategic plan will be presented to the Board of Education, which is the District s decision-making body. Task force members will meet as a whole group and in work groups, which will develop recommendations in their areas of focus. Workgroups will have access to District and external experts to help inform the work that will shape the recommendations. Workgroup membership will be determined during the first task force meeting Thursday, April 9, 2015. 4 Workgroups: Overview The table below offers an overview of the four task force workgroups. Each group will be guided by the District s instructional technology vision, mission, and core values; and each group will incorporate monitoring, continuous improvement, change management, and shared leadership in its recommendations. Vision, Mission, & Core Values [Development of teacher knowledge and skill, increasing student engagement, providing challenging academic content] Workgroup 1 Curriculum: What Will Students Learn? Workgroup 2 Teaching & Learning: How Will Students Learn? Workgroup 3 Tools & Support: What Resources Will Be Needed? Workgroup 4 Operation & Structures How Will It Work? Standards & Curriculum Pedagogy & Instructional Strategies Cost & Resource Management Implementation & Sustainability Options & Resources Student-Centered Culture Infrastructure & Technology Structure & Change Assessments Professional Learning Facilities & Materials Home/School Connections Monitoring, Continuous Improvement, and Change Management through Shared Leadership 2

Workgroup 1 - Curriculum: What Will Students Learn? Standards & Curriculum What elements are needed in District academic policies to support the core values of this plan? Two-way coordination needed with College & Career Readiness Plan team What types of curriculum content (e.g., print, digital, blended; open source, published, original, etc.) best support the core values and alignment with the Common Core State Standards? How will curriculum content be chosen? Options & Resources What choice will schools have in curricular options? (from portfolio, for instance, or signature programs, magnets, and other choices) Is there a minimum student-to-digital learning tool ratio required as a baseline at each school, for any of the models to be doable? What choices will schools have in digital learning tools? How will we ensure that gaps in access to learning opportunities are closed, through a variety of choices offered, so that the unique needs of each school community are met? Assessments What types of assessments effectively measure student growth and achievement (including consideration of Common Core State Standards and college and career readiness)? What are current District Assessments? Do they need to change to support our core values? How will data be gathered to inform progress monitoring? What are best practices for a continuous formative assessment feedback loop? Workgroup 2 - Teaching & Learning: How Will Students Learn? Pedagogy & Instructional Strategies What will effective implementation of the core values look like in teaching and learning? What are the desired learning outcomes? How will teachers use technology to support personalized learning and the other core values of this plan? What are best practices / best models to support the core values? What core elements will be in place to more effectively integrate education technology to personalize learning? How will success be measured? Student-Centered What are expectations for student involvement in planning and ownership of their own learning? 3

Workgroup 2 - Teaching & Learning: How Will Students Learn? Culture What are best practices for students as leaders in education technology integration? How will success be measured? Professional Learning What professional development formats and structures (e.g., face-to-face, online interactive, online self-paced, blended; train-the-trainers, school-based coaching, school-based sessions, central sessions) best serve the needs of our educators? What professional development is needed for ESC superintendents and directors? For principals? How will District professional development opportunities align with the mission and core values of this plan? How will the District ensure that adequate supports and interventions are in place as schools transition to personalized learning? How will success be measured? Workgroup 3 - Tools & Support: What Resources Are Needed? Cost & Resource Management Infrastructure: Digital Learning Tools What funding is available from the District? What other potential funding sources can be explored now and in the future by the District and/or by schools (by repurposing District funds, exploring foundations/grants, etc.)? How can business, civic, and community-based partnerships (e.g., government agencies, institutions of higher education, business organizations, Internet service providers) What digital learning tools do schools have? What is the policy for purchasing tools and refreshing them over time? Facilities & Materials What changes are needed in the ITD strategic plan? What changes are needed for the technical support structure (for instance, to support technology use at home; or to set guidelines for support available in the event of BYOD) What security measures are needed with infusion of technology in schools? Are changes needed in facilities planning to support the vision, mission, and core values of this plan? 4

Workgroup 4 - Operations & Structures: How Will It Work? Implementation & Sustainability What is the timeline for the phase-in plan? What criteria (e.g., demonstration of readiness; cohorts built around common needs, goals, or other shared characteristics; pilots) will be used to prioritize schools for rollout? What template could support schools in developing a personalized learning plan enhanced by technology to reflect the core values of this plan? How will success of implementation be measured? What choice will schools have in terms of digital learning tools and integration models? How do different District elements (e.g., ESCs, the Instructional Technology Initiative, other parts of OCISS) interact with ESCs in providing support for instructional and operational readiness, and for initial implementation? How will schools build capacity to become self-sufficient? How will initial schools successes and lessons learned be shared with schools preparing and beginning to launch? Structure & Change What are roles of different District departments in implementing this plan? What are best models for change management in education? How does the District communicate and support schools in communicating around this plan and its implementation? Home/School Connections What expectations are there for each school in building parent participation and developing parent education? What central structures and resources are needed to support this? What safety concerns need to be addressed? Students online safety: What are best practices for digital citizenship education This ties to Curriculum focus area) Students physical safety for schools that choose a 24/7 model (BYOD or school-/districtprovided devices) Some schools within and outside of ITI have 24/7 models 5