DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05



Similar documents
Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods

Where available we have reviewed preliminary documents completed as part of these studies.

Preparing a Green Wedge Management Plan

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Design Regina, Part A - Citywide Plan, Phasing and Financing Policies

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. State Planning Policy state interest guideline. State transport infrastructure

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

DRAFT POLICIES COUNTY OF HALIBURTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE

Envision Venice Strategic Plan for Fiscal Year Ending. September 30, Preserving and Enhancing the Venice Quality of Life.

TEXT AMENDMENT SUMMARY INFORMATION

STANDARD ELEMENTS OF A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN

Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners

Request for Proposal. Retail Consulting Services Date issued: Monday November 24, 2014 Close date: Wednesday December 10, 2014 at 12:00 pm MST

OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK REPORT

Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report

City Planning Heritage Preservation

1. REPORT CONTEXT Description of the development (include all of the following that are known at the time of the application):

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Transportation Master Plan DRAFT POLICIES FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

Growth Management in the City of Brampton

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Comprehensive Plan Amendment

PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5

AMENDED OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, VILLAGE DOCKLANDS PRECINCT, 2-46 BATMANS HILL DRIVE, DOCKLANDS

Latitude 32 Planning Policy 1 - Strategic Planning (Final for Advertising - October 2014)

What is the Register?

21.04 LAND USE. Managing amenity through land use strategies

Attachment B Policy Audit Template

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

S. BLOCK 68 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Revitalization Tax Exemptions. A Primer on the Provisions in the Community Charter

From Mobility to Accessibility: Addressing the Barrier Effect of Railway Infrastructure in Urban South Africa

# U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E S P E C I F I C P L A N Page 1-1 # 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 University Avenue, Historical Context

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

CHAPTER VIII. HARDSHIP RELIEF

PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN

SAN DIEGO CREEK NORTH. Prepared for: City ofnewport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663

Special Planning. What is a. What does an SPP affect?

Ontario Human Rights Commission. Statutory Public Meeting for the Draft City-wide Zoning By-law

HIGHLANDS NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY AREA PARKING ANALYSIS

Heritage Place Code. Heritage Place Code

FY 2014 PERFORMANCE PLAN Office of Planning

References (Statutes/Resos/Policies): Title 32 C.R.S.,, Land Development Regulation, Zoning Resolution; CC92-47; CC97-544;CC03-388, CC05-398

TOWN OF BRADFORD WEST GWILLIMBURY STRATEGIC PLAN COMPONENTS ( ) JANUARY 31, 2015

Downtown Core Sub-district

Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Borough of Glassboro, New Jersey May Redevelopment Plan for Rehabilitation In the Borough of Glassboro May 2010

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

Development Variance Permit Application Package


STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

The Lancaster Medical District Master Plan. The Lancaster Campus District 1

Request for Proposal

50 Bloor Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

ACT CANADA. Region of Peel TDM & Development Approvals Workshop. Summary Report

Heart of Peoria Land Development Code

CONSENT, PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 34A, 88, 104, 104C, and 108 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT, IS GRANTED. THE FULL DECISION IS SET OUT BELOW

REPORTS SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENT 11 MAY 2015 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING OF COUNCIL

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the duty and power to:

Public Worksessions - A Summary of the New York City Zoning and Planning Study

Major General Plan Amendment. Project Narrative

There are access points readily available into the site.

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES The following sections list the implementation strategies for following chapters.

DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Georgian College Neighbourhood Community Improvement Plan Financial Incentives Application

Shannon Corner Service Centre, Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NP

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

Recommendations on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments

Appendix N: Bicycle Parking Ordinance

CITY OF SUBIACO. PLANNING POLICY 1.4 (September 2013) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING PROPOSALS

Building Report & Consent

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

Corridor Goals and Objectives

City Plan Part 1 Sustainability Appraisal Summary February 2012

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

City of North Miami Beach, Florida Planning and Zoning Department

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Transportation Impact Assessment Guidelines

DECISION/DIRECTION NOTE

CHAIR AND MEMBERS - PLANNING COMMllTEE MEETING ON JUNE 19,2006 GENERALMANAGEROFPLANNINGANDDEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DRAFT APPROVAL

Downtown Tall Buildings Project - Consultant's Study, Public Consultation and Implementation

Technical Advice Note: Retail Impact Assessments

HOW TO SET UP A CHILD CARE CENTRE IN MOSMAN

COPCUT RISE COPCUT RISE DROITWICH SPA CONSULTATION STATEMENT. November Prepared by Capita Lovejoy on behalf of William Davis Limited

THREE MILE PLAN/URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

Draft New Museums Site Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL SCREENING REPORT

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District STE 14 OZ and STE 14 RH

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BANFF TRAIL MASTER PLAN. Issued by the Town of Banff. P.O. Box 1260, 110 Bear St. Banff, AB T1L 1A1

2 Integrated planning. Chapter 2. Integrated Planning. 2.4 State highway categorisation and integrated planning

St. Clair College Planning Area Introduction

Transcription:

PARKING INITIATIVES Attachment I Corridor Program Descriptions Corridor Program Pilot Though the Corridor Program will officially launch in the fall, this summer, The City will pilot the first phase of the Corridor Program along three corridors Richmond Road SW, Bowness Road NW and 36 Street NE. This pilot includes two components: a neighbourhood charter and an economic analysis. A neighbourhood charter will allow community members to identify the issues, opportunities and outcomes they would like to see in their neighbourhoods. The City and the community can then use this charter as another tool to evaluate applications. The economic analysis will study the local market and help determine what is needed to achieve the desired outcomes. Residents, businesses, landowners and developers will provide feedback on both the pilot and the public participation; planners will then present this feedback as a pilot review to Council in September. The Corridor Program Beginning in fall, the corridor program will launch for Calgary s 24 corridors or main streets (identified in the Municipal Development Plan excluding the three greenfield corridors). The first phase of the program involves learning and understanding the corridors through the economic analysis and neighbourhood charter exercises as described above. The second phase will include a policy document addressing commonalities across corridors (heritage preservation, shadowing, parking etc.) along with a draft corridor zone. The last phase will look at methods for improving corridors and applying the new zone, if beneficial. Key Contact: Kevin Barton, (403) 268-5927 City-Wide (MDP) Retail/Commercial Study City Wide and Regional Strategies is undertaking a citywide retail and commercial study. The aim of the study is to gain a better understanding of Calgary s existing retail and commercial areas. This study will examine retail trends and the financial and other impacts, barriers or opportunities related to the different forms, locations and scales of retail and commercial development. Parking is among the many factors that will be considered as part of the evaluation. These findings will give direction for the development of commercial sites; this includes incentives to support the redevelopment and viability of Calgary s existing neighbourhood, or larger community serving commercial areas. The study program will position Calgary in its larger metropolitan area with a comprehensive approach and vision for all new and existing retail and commercial areas-making sure the resulting developments align more closely with the goals of the Municipal Development Plan. Key Contact: Denise Carbol, (403) 268-3263 Parking Policy Framework for Calgary The Parking Policy Framework for Calgary is available on the web at: http://www.calgary.ca/pda/lupp/pages/publications/publications.aspx This is a city wide parking strategy and identifies areas for future work including on and off-street parking management. At the time of writing, a report to the Standing Policy Committee on Transportation and Transit updating City parking policy initiatives is tentatively scheduled for 2014 July 18. Key Contact: Chris Blaschuk, (403) 268-8228

PROPOSED POLICY OUTLINE, Council 2013 September 16 Attachment II

Planning Policy Principles to Guide Discretion on Proposed Parking Relaxations in Commercial Districts City Wide (2014) Attachment III The following planning principles apply to existing buildings located in commercial districts as defined by Land Use Bylaw 1P2007, as amended. These districts currently include: Part 7: Commercial Districts Division 2: Commercial- Neighbourhood 1 (C-N1) District Division 3: Commercial Neighbourhood 2 (C-N2) District Division 4: Commercial Community 1 (C-C1) District Division 5: Commercial Community 2 (C-C2) District Division 6: Commercial Corridor 1 (C-COR1) District Division 7: Commercial Corridor 2 (C-COR2) District Division 8: Commercial Corridor 3 (C-COR3) District Division 9: Commercial Office f#h# (C-O f#h#) District Division 10: Commercial Regional 1 f# (C-R1 f#) District Division 11: Commercial Regional 2 f# (C-R2 f#) District Division 12: Commercial Regional 3 f#h# (C-R3 f#h#) District Part 11: Centre City Districts Division 5: Centre City Mixed Use District (CC-X) Division 6: Centre City Commercial Corridor District (CC-COR) The planning principles shall be used in conjunction with the Municipal Development Plan, any Statutory Local Area Plans and the Land Use Bylaw to evaluate variations to minimum parking requirements in commercial districts city wide. The policy in this document are not a strict set of rules, they provide policy principles on the issues to be evaluated prior to making both permitted use with relaxation and discretionary decisions pursuant to sections 31 and 36 of the Land Use Bylaw. Where a deviation from these planning principals is deemed necessary by the Subdivision or Development Authorities, each development proposal will need to be assessed on its own merits. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency with the planning policy principles and a statutory plan and/or the land use bylaw; those documents shall prevail. Objectives To ensure that parking relaxations are considered for heritage buildings. To ensure a balanced approach is taken to parking relaxations when the considering the adaptive reuse of commercial buildings. To ensure that buildings that have a built form consistent with the purpose of the district, in which they are located have appropriate opportunities for adaptive reuse.

To ensure that the potential impacts of parking relaxations and potential mitigation measures are considered when the subdivision and development authorities consider a request for a parking relaxation. To improve transparency on the principles considered when evaluating and processing parking relaxations. A. Overall Policy A.1 In order to encourage the retention and adaptive re-use of potential heritage properties, parking relaxations are encouraged when the building is on the City Inventory of potential heritage sites. This policy is supported by sections 31, 36, and 124 (1) of Bylaw 1P2007. A.2 When considering a relaxation of minimum parking requirements in commercial districts, the Subdivision and Development Authorities shall take into account: a. the purpose of the District; b. any plans and policies affecting the parcel if the proposed development is discretionary; c. the compatibility of the existing building form with the purpose of the District. For instance, is the continued retention of the building appropriate given the development form and uses endorsed in the District; d. the size or shape of the parcel, any topographical constraints, or practical difficulties in accommodating parking on a developed parcel; e. the availability of a residential parking permit zone and the hours restricted. For example, will the current restrictions mitigate a potential relaxation; f. proximity of residential uses, the adjacent street layout and potential impacts from traffic and spill-over parking; g. the current on-street parking restrictions in effect in the commercial area and the hours restricted; h. sound planning principles; and i. if developments providing a higher standard than required by the District rules of Bylaw 1P2007 will off-set any impacts of granting a relaxation (such as, but not limited to: pedestrian features, furniture, or bike parking). Mitigating features may be subject to a development permit condition. This policy is supported by sections 30, 31, 33, 35, 36, 38, and 124 of Bylaw 1P2007. A.3 To support the adaptive reuse of buildings or considerations related to the size or shape of the parcel, topographical constraints or practical difficulties in accommodating parking on a developed parcel, relaxations to the minimum parking requirements may be considered when parking is proposed off-site: a. within walking distance (600 metres) of the site with the proposed parking relaxation; and b. if the stalls are on parcels that form part of the same development permit. This policy is supported by sections 31, 36, 116 and 124 of Bylaw 1P2007.

A.4 Parking relaxations within the following Municipal Development Plan Typologies may be appropriate where there is strong support for mixed-uses, synergistic parking opportunities and multi-modal (walking, cycling, and transit) opportunities: Centre City; Major Activity Centres; Community Activity Centres; Urban Corridors; Neighbourhood Corridors; and Urban and Neighbourhood Boulevards as identified in the Calgary Transportation Plan. The Subdivision and Development Authorities shall consider the status of the built form in these areas as they transition in order to determine the scope and scale of any requested parking relaxation. A.5 Commercial parking relaxations may be considered where there are opportunities for synergistic parking. This may include consideration of anticipated operating hours and coordination with uses that have opposing hours of operation. For example: day employment intensive uses such as an office or medical use may have parking stalls available for evening use. Proposals for synergistic parking will require information from the proponent at the time of application including information on the mechanisms used to maintain access to the stalls and the operating hours of other uses. This policy is supported by sections 31, 36, 116 and 124 of Bylaw 1P2007. A.6 Commercial parking relaxations may be considered where on-street parking demand is already regulated by price or time restrictions such as Park Plus or street sign restrictions. Proposals that include on-street parking as a mitigation measure for proposed parking relaxations will require information from the proponent on anticipated impacts if the on-street parking is no longer available. On-street parking is a City of Calgary resource and is subject to change based on the priorities of the corporation. The Subdivision and Development Authorities should also consider the cumulative impact of parking relaxations within the vicinity. A.7 The provision of car pool, car share or valet services may be considered in the evaluation of a proposed parking relaxation when the following is available within walking distance (600 metres) of the site with the proposed relaxation: a. public parking facilities. Facilities operated by the Calgary Parking Authority may provide some ability to accommodate spillover parking demand; or b. there is a site parking management plan available to support services like car pools, or car2go. Proposals for car pool, car share or valet services will require information from the proponent at the time of application including information on the mechanisms used to maintain access to the stalls and manage the service. This policy is supported by sections 31, 36, 116 and 124 of Bylaw 1P2007.

A.8 Parking relaxations within walking distance (600 metres) of residential uses may be supported when there is a 24 hour / 7 day a week residential parking zone. Other mitigation measures may also be included such as, but not limited to: partial or full road closures to restrict access to residential uses or other transportation demand management initiatives. This policy is supported by section 124 of Bylaw 1P2007.