CMM PRE-FINANCE INFORMATION. Krasnogorskaya Mine Methane Utilisation Synopsis. Entire report available from Uglemetan (tailakov@uglemetan.



Similar documents
The changing role of gas transmission organisations

2014 FIRST QUARTER RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL. May 15th, 2014

2014 FULL YEAR RESULTS

eeef - European Energy Efficiency Fund

2015 FIRST HALF RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL. August 31st, 2015

97 MW of Cat coal seam methane power in New South Wales, Australia

Xtract Resources Plc (AIM:XTR) Chepica Gold Mine: Quarterly Results Presentation

Potential of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Savings To Impact Florida s Projected Energy Use in 2014

Developing Power Projects in Southern Africa. Annual General Meeting Presentation 20 th November 2015

Developing Power Projects in Southern Africa. Cape Town Presentation 8 th February 2016

COMMERCIAL LAND ON HWY 65

Corporate Carbon Neutral Plan

Poiana 1 PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY PROJECT

Fuel cell microchp: Greener and cheaper energy for all

Rainwater Harvesting

Botswana Power Development! March 2015!

Our Deep Geothermal Energy Potential: A Case Study in Saskatchewan with Application Throughout the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin

Investing in an Underground Coal Mine in Indonesia

Exclusive Offering Memorandum

Sale of receivables from the Spanish Public Health Care Sector. Cleaning up your Balance Sheet

THE EUROPEAN GREEN BUILDING PROGRAMME. Technical Module on Combined Heat and Power

Interview: Aurélie Faure, Financial Analyst at Dexia Asset Management

Midwest Utilities Seminar 2014

"New style" Basel III-compliant bank subordinated debt and Additional Tier 1 securities/hybrids are higher risk

The Merchant Securities FTSE 100. Hindsight II Note PRIVATE CLIENT ADVISORY

SO YOU THINK YOU WANT TO START AN OIL AND GAS COMPANY?

Trip to Pulacayo. Pulacayo - Paca

Fiscal Year 2011 Resource Plan

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

Green Bonds presentation From Challenge to implementation. Christopher Flensborg January 2015

The Real Cost of Electrical Energy. Outline of Presentation

Social Return on Investment

VERIFICATION STATEMENT GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

NEVADA COPPER FILES INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY STUDY ON SEDAR

How To Sell Golden Pages To A Private Company

Gjensidige Insurance Group Q and preliminary 2008

Gjensidige in brief. Attractive position in Nordic GI. Balanced retail portfolio. Private and SME exposure 80 % direct distribution

If a Client and a Freelancer enter an independent contractor relationship, then this Freelancer Agreement ( Freelancer Agreement ) will apply.

PROCUREMENT GUIDE: CHP FINANCING

This document has been provided by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL).

FINANCIAL AND RISK ANALYSIS WITH RETSCREEN SOFTWARE. SLIDE 1: Financial and Risk Analysis with RETScreen Software

ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF THE ETS PROPOSAL ON THE EUROPEAN CEMENT INDUSTRY. Final project report Executive summary

GATWICK AIRPORT* RESULTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2015

Steam Turbine Concepts for the Future Volatile Power Market

Quarterly Income Statement

CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT ANALYSIS WITH RETSCREEN SOFTWARE

PROJECT FINANCIAL EVALUATION

2015 FULL YEAR RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL. March 14th, 2016

3.0 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Derisking Renewable Energy Investment

CMPDI. An ISO 9001Company. R.K.Chopra Director (Tech/RD&T), CMPDI, Ranchi, INDIA

Ceramic Fuel Cells World Leader in Fuel Cell Technology Clifford Ashby, CFO August, 2014

Rocket Internet Co-Investment Fund

TURNING LOGISTICS NETWORKS INTO STRATEGIC ASSETS

Cogeneration Based District Heating Restoration Project in Avan District of Yerevan, Armenia

SBERBANK GROUP S IFRS RESULTS. March 2015

Work package 3 Comparison of member state approaches

Reducing CO2 emissions for Offshore oil and gas Operations under ETS. Margaret Christie, Environmental Advisor, UK Business Unit, Premier Oil UK Ltd

COMPANY UPDATE FIRST QUARTER 2016 RESULTS

Natural Gas Conversions of Existing Coal-Fired Boilers

R49 Using SAP Payment Engine for payment transactions. Process Diagram

Feasibility. A guide to feasibility planning for junior mining companies

GENERATION TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

FINANCIAL EVALUATION OF ENERGY SAVING PROJECTS: BUILDING THE BUSINESS CASE

NEWS RELEASE LEXAM ANNOUNCES POSITIVE PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT RESULTS FOR THE OPEN PIT PROJECTS IN TIMMINS

Pension Funds and other Infrastructure Investors Interested in Nuclear New Build?

2Q2014 IFRS Consolidated Financial Results. October 15, 2014

Update following the publication of the Bank of England Stress Test. 16 December 2014

What will it be; define the value

Riga Smart City Concept. Timurs Safiuļins Riga Energy Agency

SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF

Annex 1 Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality

Investor presentation

PACIFIC ENERGY LIMITED POWER GENERATION

DATA CENTRE DESIGN AND

Landfill Gas In Ireland - The Facts

FRC Risk Reporting Requirements Working Party Case Study (Hospitality Industry)

Report to the Legislative Assembly

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

Achmea Investment Management. 26 May 2016 Jacob de Wit Leiden

International Financial Accounting (IFA)

Annual Financial Results Presentation for year ended 30 June October 2014

The Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM) What is it? And how can it be used to promote climate protection and sustainable development?

Get a Solar Home Now: How Installing Solar Can Power the World

COMMODITY STRUCTURED NOTES Introducing The World s Oldest Asset Class... For Today s Investors

Climate Change and Infrastructure Planning Ahead

UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION. By Lian Hattingh

African Barrick Gold. BMO Global Metals & Mining Conference February 2013

Hydro Power Projections Report. Jennifer Palmer

KAZAKHMYS PLC. 20 June TH FLOOR CARDINAL PLACE 100 VICTORIA STREET LONDON SW1E 5JL Tel: +44 (0)

Australian Remote Renewables: Opportunities for Investment

Green Investment Handbook

MERKO EHITUS GROUP Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. 29 April 2015 Nordic Hotel Forum, Tallinn

Managing Rising Energy Costs for Seniors in the ACT

This document outlines Wales & West Utilities Business Plan for the next regulatory period from

Should Costing Version 1.1

A new direction in energy?

ICE Legal Notes Series

Guidelines for the Estimation and Reporting of Australian Black Coal Resources and Reserves

Transcription:

CMM PRE-FINANCE INFORMATION Krasnogorskaya Mine Methane Utilisation Synopsis Entire report available from Uglemetan (tailakov@uglemetan.ru) 1

JUNE 2008 2

IMPORTANT NOTICE This Pre-Finance Information ( Information ) was prepared by UNECE with contribution by its UNECE advisors Karl Schultz, Climate Mitigation Works; Oleg Tailakov, Uglemetan and Deltcho Vitchev, Renaissance Finance International (the UNECE ) solely for information purposes from materials provided to the UNECE by SDS Coal ( SDS or the Company ) and material publicly available. The UNECE on behalf of SDS is distributing this Information solely for use by interested investors to determine whether they would like to proceed with further investigation into the proposition as detailed in accompanying request for proposal (the Transaction ). Use of this Information is governed by the terms of the previously executed confidentiality agreement, which strictly limits the circulation and copying of the information contained in this Pre-Finance Information. Each recipient of the Pre-Finance Information (the Recipient ) should familiarise him/herself with the terms of the confidentiality agreement before reading, using or circulating this Pre- Finance Information. This Pre-Finance Information may not be reproduced or used without the prior written approval of SDS or the UNECE for any other purpose than the evaluation of the Transaction by the Recipient. The information contained herein has been prepared to assist the Recipient in making its own evaluation of the Transaction and does not purport to contain all the information that the Recipient may desire. In all cases, the Recipient should conduct its own investigation and analysis of the Transaction and of the data set forth in this Pre-Finance Information. Neither SDS nor the UNECE assume any responsibility for independent verification of any of the information contained herein, including any statements about the prospects of the Transaction contained herein. Neither SDS nor the UNECE make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy, fairness or completeness of this Pre-Finance Information or the information contained in, or omitted from, this Pre-Finance Information and each expressly disclaims any and all liability for statements (express or implied) contained in, or omitted from, this Pre-Finance Information or any other written or oral communications transmitted or made available to the Recipient in the course of its evaluation of the Transaction. Only those particular representations and warranties, if any, which may be made to a party in a definitive written agreement regarding the Transaction, when, as and if executed, and subject to such limitations and restrictions as may be specified therein, will have any legal effect. The statements, Financial estimates and projections contained in this Pre-Finance Information and other information provided in connection with this Pre-Finance Information reflect various assumptions made by SDS concerning anticipated results and are subject to significant business, economic, legislature and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of SDS. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such statements, estimates and projections will be realised. The actual results will likely vary from the forecast, and those variations may be material. Neither SDS nor the UNECE makes any representations as to the accuracy or completeness of such statements, estimates and projections or that any forecasts will be achieved. By accepting this Pre-Finance Information, the Recipient acknowledges and agrees that 1) all of the information contained herein is subject to a confidentiality agreement previously executed by the Recipient except as permitted by the confidentiality agreement; 2) the Recipient may distribute or reproduce this Pre-Finance Information, in whole or in part, only in accordance with the confidentiality agreement and only for the purpose of the evaluation of the Transaction by the Recipient; 3) if the Recipient does not wish to pursue this matter, or at the request of SDS and the UNECE, it will return this Pre-Finance Information to SDS or the UNECE as soon as practical, together with any other materials relating to the Transaction which it may have received from SDS or the UNECE; and 4) any proposed actions by the Recipient which may be inconsistent in any respect with the foregoing will require written consent of SDS and the UNECE. This Pre-Finance Information and any other information provided in connection with this Pre-Finance Information is not to be construed as investment advice by the UNECE and / or SDS. 3

1 UNECE PROGRAMME The UNECE has received funding from the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) to provide technical assistance to coal mines in Russia and other countries to develop early stage bankable documentation for coal mine methane (CMM) projects and to introduce such projects and their sponsors to potential investors. The UNECE is unable to support full feasibility or project financing or any design and engineering services; however, the UNECE can act as a bridge to others who can provide these services. The underlying purpose of the project is to improve mine safety, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the mining industry, and encourage the rational use of energy resources in support of the goals and objectives of the Methane to Markets Partnership. Through this project, the UNECE seeks to achieve these goals by catalyzing project development through support of the early activities that are necessary, but often overlooked, in conceptualizing, planning and implementing a CMM project. The project began in 2004 and concludes in September 2008. 2 THE MINE AND THE PROJECT 2.1 INTRODUCTION Krasnogorskaya mine is located in the southern part of the Kuzbass coal region near the town of Prokopevsk in Kemerovo Oblast. The mine is owned by SDS Coal, part of SDS Group headquartered in Moscow. The mine produces cocking coal for local markets. The proven reserves of coal are 18 million tons, which is 35 years at current planed production of 600,000 tons per year. The current production is 300,000 tons/year. However the mine plans to increase the production to 1 million tons per year by 2012. The depth of mine coal seams is 450 meters bellow surface with steeply angled dip. Specific emissions of methane from the mine are estimated at 14.0 to 22.0 m3/ton of coal. The mine currently drains methane through in-mine boreholes. Methane from the boreholes is collected by a gathering system at a single point and all of it is vented. The mine operator estimates the methane drained to 3.5 to 4.0 million m3/year. In addition the ventilation system releases an estimated 8.5 million m3/year with an average concentration of 0.4%. The mine does not utilise any methane either from the ventilation or the drainage systems. The current concentration of methane in the gas drainage system is bellow 30% for one third of the operation time. The mine has expressed interest in utilising the methane from the drainage system in on-side boilers for heat and generation of electricity. In addition, the mine has also expressed interest in flaring any excess methane resulting from not use in the summer months. 4

To utilise the methane for heat or electricity generation it is necessary to upgrade the drainage system to deliver concentrations above 30% consistently. The mine stated its intent to upgrade the system and schedule the coal production in order to achieve such concentration. The utilisation of ventilation methane from the mine with the currently available technologies would be non economical. At current production, the mine has a heat demand of 18 Gcal from October through May, met by 4 coal boilers with a total capacity of 24 Gcal and uses electrical heathers of 250 kw for hot water in the summer. To power the boilers the mine buys 15,000 to 17,000 tons of coal per year at current price of 543 R/ton. An increased production of the mine is not expected to materially increase the demand for heat. The base load electrical demand of the mine is 17 MW throughout the year. The expected increase of coal production is expected to result in 30-40% electricity demand by 2012. There are plans to drill test wells 3 in the pillar area and 1 in the virgin coal seam. The methane potentially produced by these wells as reported by the developer - from 10,000 to 20,000 m3/day from each well is not being taken into account in this analysis. For comparison, the current volume of the methane from the mine to be used is assumed to be 10,000 m3/day. 2.2 TECHNOLOGIES FOR HEAT AND ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION Heat Production One of the options to utilise the mine methane is to use 100% of the available methane as Boiler fuel replacing part of the coal purchases for boiler fuel from October through May. A flaring of the methane will be required from May to October. Currently there are 4 coal boilers of total capacity of 24 Gcal/h from which the mine uses 18 Gcal/h and one of the boilers is in reserve. A small pilot boiler of 0.6 Gcal/h is being installed in the framework of an UNDP sponsored project. Our understanding is that the existing 4 outdated boilers, commissioned between 1959 and 1961, will be replaced with new, more efficient boilers. The amount of heat which can be produced using the coal mine methane is estimated at 3.5 Gcal/h. With the planned increase of coal production in 2012 it is estimated that the drained methane would be able to produce 7.1 Gcal/h. The following assumptions were applied in this scenario: 1. Volume of drained methane: 3.5 million m3/year in 2008, increasing on linear basis to 7.0 m3/year in 2012. 2. Incremental cost of converting two of the replaced boilers to dual fuel coal/methane. 3. Distance between the boiler station and the pumping house is 500 m. 4. Purchase and installation of piping and vacuum pumps. 5. 100% of the available methane is used in the boilers from October to May and fared from May to October. 6. Purchase of enclosed flare. 5

7. The cost of avoided coal is assumed at 460 Roubles/ton + VAT (NDS) 18% (June 2008) 8. It is assumed that the emissions of the avoided coal will be credited to the project at a ratio of 1 ton of coal avoided results in 1 ton of CO2 avoided. Electricity Generation 1. The proposed configuration envisages purchase and installation of, initially 1 and in future up to 3, electricity generating installations of installed capacity of 1.3 MWe each. 2. 100% of the electricity generated will be used to contribute to the base load requirement of the mine and offset equivalent amounts of electricity purchased from the grid. 3. The cost of avoided electricity is assumed at 2.0 Roubles/kWh (June 2008) 4. It is assumed that the electricity generated will replace electricity from the grid, which in Kemerovo region is generated by coal power plants. Recommendation for improvement: The use of waste heat from electricity production may be a more profitable and energy efficient way of use of the methane resource, but may be technically more complicated. It is recommended that this option is considered in a further study. 3 INVESTMENT PLAN AND FINANCE 3.1 BASE CASE ASSUMPTIONS The current model has been prepared with a limited information of the financial status, situation and forecasts for the mine and its owner SDS Ugol. To illustrate the financial performance of the different options, it is assumed that they are financed entirely by own equity and any financial impact of taxes, tax rebates, value added tax, inflation, currency depreciation and similar, are not being considered in this preliminary financial analysis. Without a knowledge of the actual cost of capital employed, or the hurdle rate used by the company, a discount rate of 10% has been used as a base case. 3.1.1 TIMING OF THE PROJECT It is assumed that the project will start in 2009, the equipment will be purchased and installed by the end of 2009 and be operational in 2010. An economic life of 15 years is assumed. 3.1.2 RESULTS OF COST/REVENUE AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS The results of the analysis show that both project options can be profitable and achieve positive rates of return. The base case for power generation yields a net present value (NPV) of 32 million roubles (RUR) and an internal rate of return (IRR) of 20%. For use in boilers and flaring, the base case delivers an NPV of 16 million RUR and an IRR of 16%. No use of external finance is being considered at this stage. For the base case, a carbon price of 16 per tonne of CO2 was used through 2012 and 8 per tonne of CO2 from 2013-2025. 6

To test alternative cases, several sensitivity analyses were run considering differing power prices, cost, discount rates and carbon prices. The results show great sensitivity to changes in these key factors, especially carbon prices. 7