Recyclability & Innovation Model for PET Resin



Similar documents
Flake to Plaque Bleeding Label Test PET- B- 01

How light impacts recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rpet) characteristics. by Dr. Francis M. Schloss and Julie Brown Plastic Technologies, Inc.

Using Near-Infrared Sorting to Recycle PLA Bottles

APR Design for Recyclability Guidelines Section Excerpt

PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate, Resin Identification Code #1) PET Bottles (Carbonated Beverage, Water, and Custom Bottles)

PERP/PERP ABSTRACTS PET Bottle to Bottle Recycling

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 141A POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE BOTTLES AND BOTTLE RESINS (May 1993)

FOREWORD. The Plastics Pipe Institute. This Technical Note, TN-30, was first issued in January 2006 and was revised and republished in September 2013.

Hands-On Labs SM-1 Lab Manual

3M Ionic Liquid Antistat FC-4400

DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers

Quick Guide to Injection Molding

A Guide to Thermoform Processing of Polypropylene. Introduction

2007 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POST- CONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

2013 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POST- CONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

Rigid Packaging in PET Products, Production & Critical Success Factors

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

Understanding Plastics Engineering Calculations

PET Recycling. Nicholas Robusto Maggie Ifarraguerri Nathaniel Lawton Isabel Hefner

PET Basics RECYCLED CONTENT

EXTERIOR LONG GLASS FIBER POLYPROPYLENE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS. Abstract

SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF SUBSTANCES LAB

1. Injection Molding (Thermoplastics)

In this experiment, we will use three properties to identify a liquid substance: solubility, density and boiling point..

General Guidelines for Butt, Saddle, and Socket Fusion of Unlike Polyethylene Pipes and Fittings TN-13/2007

Determination of a Chemical Formula

NAN YA NYLON 66 Engineering Plastics. Flame Retardant.High Toughness.Heat Resistant. Impact Resistant.Moldability.Low Warpage

Experiment 7: Titration of an Antacid

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Determination of Insoluble Solids in Pretreated Biomass March 2008 Material

Simply smart, highly sustainable: The MAS Extruder for PET Recycling. Brilliant colour at highest quality

DENSITY MEASURING SYSTEMS

TCO Certified Edge Displays 2.0

AN EXPERIMENT IN ALCHEMY: COPPER TO SILVER TO GOLD 2005, 2000, 1996 by David A. Katz. All rights reserved

2014 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POSTCONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

<788> PARTICULATE MATTER IN INJECTIONS

int. ci.3. C 08 L 77/00 C 08 L 63/02

JONCRYL ADR-4380 LIQUID POLYMERIC CHAIN EXTENDER FOR CONDENSATION THERMOPLASTICS. Key Features & Benefits. General Information. Increases IV and Mw

MOISTURE (Karl Fischer, Buffered)

krones MetaPure The bottle-to-bottle PET recycling plant Pure technology

B&W PAPER DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS FOR THE DISH/TRAY PROCESSING OF BLACK AND WHITE PHOTOGRAPHIC PAPERS

PET-Bottle-to-Bottle-Recycling Key Success Factors 6 Years Experience in Switzerland

1.1.2 Polypropylene The polypropylene must be a white opaque film, 1 2 mil thick. Biaxial orientation is preferred.

SECTION 623 CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND, EPOXY MORTAR AND EPOXY POLYMER CONCRETE OVERLAY SECTION CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND.

Physical and Chemical Changes

Synthesis of Aspirin and Oil of Wintergreen

Scotch-Weld. Low-Odor Acrylic Adhesives DP810 DP810 NS. Technical Data June, 2004

CHEMICAL FOAM EXTRUSION PROCESSING GUIDE

Amodel AS-1133 HS. polyphthalamide. Technical Data Sheet

AG 501-X8 and Bio-Rex MSZ 501(D) Mixed Bed Resin Instruction Manual. Bio-Rad Laboratories, 2000 Alfred Nobel Dr., Hercules CA LIT205 Rev B

Scotch-Weld TM. Epoxy Adhesive 1838 B/A Green 1838 B/A Tan 1838-L B/A Translucent. Technical Data February, Product Description

Pre-Lab Notebook Content: Your notebook should include the title, date, purpose, procedure; data tables.

Material Safety Data Sheet

Environmental Stress Crack Resistance Of Polyethylene

4. Cryogenic gloves are generally designed to protect the hands from intense cold or heat.

TWIN-SCREW COROTATING EXTRUDER A FLEXIBLE SOLUTION FOR ADVANCED RECYCLING

KODAK Developer System Cleaner and Neutralizer

CHEM 2423 Recrystallization of Benzoic Acid EXPERIMENT 4 - Purification - Recrystallization of Benzoic acid

ANTIOXIDANTS. ...used to prevent thermal degradation. ...inhibit oxidation (i.e. degradation) are cheap insurance for multiple pass materials

Recovery of Elemental Copper from Copper (II) Nitrate

Mixing in the process industry: Chemicals Food Pharmaceuticals Paper Polymers Minerals Environmental. Chemical Industry:

1 Introduction The Scientific Method (1 of 20) 1 Introduction Observations and Measurements Qualitative, Quantitative, Inferences (2 of 20)

Section 16 - Troubleshooting

PART I: PREPARATION OF SOLUTIONS AND STANDARDIZATION OF A BASE

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Test Bank - Chapter 3 Multiple Choice

3M Thermally Conductive Adhesive Transfer Tapes

3M Thermally Conductive Epoxy Adhesive TC-2810

CHAPTER 2 INJECTION MOULDING PROCESS

Triple Point Experiment

IDENTIFICATION OF POLYMERS 1998 by David A. Katz. All rights reserved

MULTILAYER CONTAINERS FEATURING NANO-NYLON MXD6 BARRIER LAYERS WITH SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE AND CLARITY

The Empirical Formula of a Compound

Experiment 3: Extraction: Separation of an Acidic, a Basic and a Neutral Substance

Technical Data Sheet L Top coats. Mat Clear

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL

Polarity and Properties Lab PURPOSE: To investigate polar and non-polar molecules and the affect of polarity on molecular properties.

Double Coated Urethane Foam Tapes

3.8 HSP (High Solids Polyurethane)

Dissolving of sodium hydroxide generates heat. Take care in handling the dilution container.

Technical Data May, 2015

Well Water Iron Removal Using Quantum DMI-65 Granular Filter Media

Stoichiometry Limiting Reagent Laboratory. Chemistry 118 Laboratory University of Massachusetts, Boston

Physical and Chemical Properties and Changes

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis with Food Color- Teacher Guide

Stoichiometry Limiting Reagent Laboratory. Chemistry 118 Laboratory University of Massachusetts, Boston

DOW ECOLIBRIUM Bio-Based Plasticizers - Greening of PVC with Renewably Sourced Plasticizers

Copyright 1998 Society of Manufacturing Engineers FUNDAMENTAL MANUFACTURING PROCESSES PLASTIC BLOW MOLDING NARRATION (VO): NARRATION (VO):

Physical Dry Conditioned Unit Test method

DryWeight BulkVolume

3 Scotch-Weld TM. Epoxy Adhesive DP110 Translucent and Gray. Technical Data December, 2009

The challenge of mixed plastics recycling. Luca Stramare R&D Manager COREPLA (Italy)

Basic Properties and Application of Auto Enamels

Pelleting Process. Pelleting Process

BRIEFING Plastic Packaging Systems for Pharmaceutical Use.

Determining the Quantity of Iron in a Vitamin Tablet. Evaluation copy

The Aluminum Can Advantage Key Sustainability Performance Indicators June 2016

Plant Genomic DNA Extraction using CTAB

Transcription:

Recyclability & Innovation Model for PET Resin October 2012 PETRA 355 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1500 New York, NY 10017 www.petresin.org

Recyclability & Innovation Model for PET Resin Foreword: Over the past decade, dramatic advances in PET resin science have led to major technical innovations and the widespread adoption of PET as a packaging material for protecting the integrity of foods and beverages. Given its unique hygienic properties and versatility, as well as its energy- and cost-efficiency, PET has become a globally valued packaging material and the world's most commonly recycled plastic. At the same time, improved PET collection rates, advanced recycling technologies, and the growing demand for the sustainable re-use and recycling of raw materials have underscored the importance of fostering a PET recycling system that can incorporate innovation while ensuring the safety and quality of recycled PET. The plastic recycling industry has traditionally assessed the recyclability of packaging innovations through the development of guidelines and testing protocols that evaluate the performance of innovations within typical plastic recycling systems. These assessment systems consider all elements of packaging, including closures, labels, adhesives, layers and functional additives, as well as the base PET resin. In North America, the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) has developed its long-standing PET Bottle Critical Guidance Document, which focuses on evaluating innovations that will not impede or present technical challenges to the broadest range of North American recycling practices. In doing so, however, APR requires resin variants and innovations typically having a low market presence to meet the same requirements of a resin accounting for 25% or 50% of total North American PET production. In many cases, this can discourage the introduction of beneficial innovations. In Europe, the European PET Bottle Platform (EPBP) which represents a consortium of PET recycling, recovery and brand owner interests recently published a PET Recycling Test Protocol to encourage the evaluation of innovations to meet European recycling practices and goals. The EPBP protocol utilizes a broader range of testing levels to better reflect the likely presence and performance of resins, and to assess their impact on the PET stream. However, the EPBP protocol is predicated on recycling and business systems that differ significantly from North America, making it difficult to adopt the full protocol for U.S. and Canadian use.

With neither protocol meeting the specific needs of PET stakeholders seeking to introduce new innovations in today s North American market, PETRA has developed the following Recyclability & Innovation Model for PET Resin as an alternative for industry use. As readers will note, the PETRA Model incorporates aspects of both the APR and EPBP protocols, but focuses solely on the base PET resin. We believe the PETRA Model offers a more realistic and effective method for assessing recyclability that more accurately reflects the likely profile and performance of potential innovations and their impact on recycling and the quality of recycled PET. In addition, the PETRA Model calls for a monitoring system to annually test and quantify the integrity of virgin PET. PETRA encourages the use of this model and is committed to enhancing it, based on feedback from all stakeholders, in order to support advancements in PET innovation and recycling. Disclaimer: This model is voluntary and advisory only. It is intended to offer one method for assessing recyclability; suppliers, users, recyclers, and other interested parties must make their own independent determination as to the suitability of this or any other particular method. PETRA makes no express warranties and disclaims all implied warranties regarding this Model and also disclaims responsibility for any consequences arising from the use, application or reliance on the recommendations and information contained in the Model.

Recyclability & Innovation Model for PET Resin The PETRA Recyclability & Innovation Model consists of four parts: Test Protocol, Dispersion Assessment, Provision of Control Resins, and Resin Supply Testing & Monitoring I. Test Protocol (See Diagram 1, page 7) The Innovator will have produced bottles with the innovation resin (or additive at the intended level mixed with control resin), and will have produced bottles from 100% control resin. The control resin will be either a CSD-grade or Water-grade virgin resin generated by combining PET resins representative of the North American virgin PET supply. The control resin will be made available from PETRA at the time of testing. The Innovator, based on his knowledge of the innovation, should assess the likely effects of its innovation at various levels in the recycle stream. Based on that assessment, the innovator should select sample Blends B and C for testing in the protocol to best represent possible effects on recycling. Definitions of Test Blends Blend A: 100% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resin with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test (see Pg.2). Blend B: 98% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resins with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test, and 2% bottle flake made from Innovation Bottle processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test. OR 90% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resins with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test, and 10% bottle flake made from Innovation Bottle processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test. OR 75% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resins with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test, and 25% bottle flake 1

made from Innovation Bottle processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test. Based on the Innovator s selection of the Blend B option above, the respective Blend C selected below will be used for higher concentration evaluation. Blend C: 90% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resins with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test, and 10% bottle flake made from Innovation Bottle processed to flake in the Reclaim Processing Test. OR 75% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resins with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test, and 25% bottle flake made from Innovation Bottle processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test. OR 50% Control Bottle flake made from virgin PET Control Resins with bottles processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test, and 50% bottle flake made from Innovation Bottle processed to flake as indicated in the Reclaim Processing Test. Blend B and Blend C should be selected respectively from the options listed so that an innovation is tested at 2% and 10%, or 10% and 25%, or 25% and 50%. Reclaim Processing Test The following protocol is from the APR Champions for Change, Critical Issues Guidance for Innovations, PET Bottle Critical Guidance Document, Edition 5; May 2, 2011. If the innovator knows of improved recycling technology for processing its innovation, the innovator may, at its discretion, complete the test protocol below using that alternate recycling technology. This can demonstrate the possibility of a higher acceptable market presence for the innovation over the longer term. 1. Grind the whole Innovation Bottles to nominal ¼ to ½ inch size flake. Separately, grind the whole Control Bottles to nominal ¼ to ½ inch size flake. Steps 2-7 are to be performed separately for the Control resin and for the Innovation Resin 2. Utilize air elutriation to remove light fractions with one pass and with set up to accomplish less than 2% PET flake loss from the feed for Control Flake. (This step is only used for a multi-layer innovation.) 2

3. Prepare a wash solution of 0.3% by weight Triton X-l00 (6.0g or 5.7ml per 2,000 ml water) and 1.0% by weight caustic (20g NaOH per 2,000 ml water). Note that Triton X- 100 must be dissolved in warm (nominal 100 F) water prior to the addition of caustic. 4. Mix bottle flake or pellets at a ratio of 500g solids per 2,000 ml wash solution. Wash in highly agitated (1,000 rpm with impeller 0.6 cm from bottom of wash container) water at 88+/-2 C for 15 minutes. Record the composition of the wash solution. 5. After 15 minutes of washing, stop agitation and remove agitator. Remove heating. Let mixture of solids and solution stand for several minutes to allow floatable materials to float. Skim off floatables. Separate sinking solids from wash solution by pouring mixture through a strainer. Add sinking solids to room temperature rinse water at an approximate ratio of 500 grams sinking solids to 2 liters of water. Let stand for five minutes to allow remaining lights to float to the surface. Repeat sink/float step once again. 6. Transfer PET flakes to strainer, rinse flakes in cold running tap water while vigorously stirring the flakes for 10 minutes using the manual stirring bar. Drain the material. Air dry flake. 7. Use air elutriation on air-dried, washed flake for one pass with set up to accomplish less than 2% PET flake loss from the feed for washed Control Flake. Sample Preparation and Testing 1. After processing bottles through the Reclaim Processing Test defined above, blend the resulting Control bottle flake (A0) and Innovation bottle flake (I0) to create Test Blends A1, B1, and C1 at the levels chosen for the evaluation. 2 Melt extrude each test blend through 40/250/40 filtration to create A2, B2 and C2. Be sure each blend is dried for 4 to 6 hours with 340 ± 10 C air at a dew point of -20 F or lower. A moisture content of 50 ppm or less must be obtained before extrusion. a. IV Test Criteria (ASTM D4603 or equivalent): Compare IV drop through extrusion of samples B2 and C2 to sample A2. The delta of IV loss from the control should be 0.25 dl/g. 1 b. Filterability Test Criteria: Compare Sample B1 and C1 to the Control A1. Final pressure 10% above A1 after 30 minutes at an extrusion rate 375 g/cm 2 per hour. There should be no visible build-up on the screen. 1. Intrinsic viscosity, IV, is a measured surrogate for molecular weight. If the Innovation Resin is known to have a molecular structure such that the measured IV does not represent equivalent melt rheology characteristics of PET at that IV, then the melt rheology should be measured for the Control resin, the Innovation resin, and the Blends. The Innovator then should estimate the impacts for measured melt viscosity differences at near-production conditions of temperature and shear rate to use as IV targets and differences in IV drop on melting where defined in this Model. 3

3. Solid State Polymerize a portion of samples A2, B2 and C2 under identical conditions of temperature and vacuum or inert gas with temperature 205 C to create sample A3, B3 and C3. a. Solid State Polymerization Test Criteria: Withdraw a partial sample after 8 hours and measure IV (ASTM D4603 or equivalent). The delta between sample B3 and sample A3, and the delta between sample C3 and sample A3, should be 0.040 dl/g. Continue Solid State polymerization for 15 hours, withdraw a second sample and measure IV. The delta between sample B3 and sample A3, and the delta between sample C3 and sample A3, should be 0.075 dl/g. b. Melting Point Test Criteria: Using DSC set at 10 C/min. melt, crash cool and then reheat to melting. Melting point should be 235 C to 255 C for all samples. 4. Based on the solid state polymerization performance obtained from step 3, solid state polymerize additional quantities of samples A2, B2 and C2 to create samples A4, B4 and C4 that each have a measured IV of 0.80 ± 0.02 dl/g. 5. Blend pellets A4, B4 and C4 each with 50% virgin control resin pellets and injection mold into 3mm thick amorphous plaques nominally 2 x 2 square. Be sure each blend is dried for 4 to 6 hours with 340 ± 10 C air at a dew point of -20 F or lower. A moisture content of 50 ppm or less must be obtained before injection molding. The plaques are samples A5, B5 and C5. a. Plaque Testing Criteria: Using CIELAB testing in transmission (ASTM D 1003- B), L* > 82.0 for A5, B5 and C5. The b* of both samples B5 or C5 from A5 should be 2.0. The % haze measured at 550nm should be 9.5%. Black specks counted visually without magnification on 50 plaques of both B5 and C5 should be no more that 10% above those of 50 plaques of sample A5. (Color measurements should be made with a Hunter Miniscan XE or equivalent using d65 light and 10 observation angle, a white background with specular component included and diffuse/8 sphere geometry. The values used for the test criteria should be the average of at least 5 measurements on at least 5 different plaques.) 6. No innovation sample should create fuming, smoking or odors above the control during extrusion or injection molding. 7. There should be no sticking of flakes during drying for any of the innovation samples. 8. There should be no fouling of equipment during processing of any samples, nor should there be any increased fire risk. 4

II. Dispersion Assessment Based on the test results, determine at what level the innovation passes all listed criteria. If the innovation does not pass at 2%, it is not recommended. For an innovation that passes all criteria at 2%, but not at 10%, the maximum dispersion would be 0.4%. For an innovation that passes all criteria at 10%, but not at 25%, the maximum dispersion would be 2.0%. For an innovation that passes all criteria at 25%, but not at 50%, the maximum dispersion would be 5.0%. For an innovation that passes all criteria at 50%, there would be no dispersion limitations. The corresponding dispersion volume (by weight) for the innovation equals the appropriate percentage above, multiplied by the total annual North American virgin PET resin tonnage of the previous calendar year. PETRA recommends completing the test protocol and dispersion assessment for all significant new resin innovations. III. Provision of Control Resins To ensure that recyclability assessment is based upon the actual composition of the virgin PET supply, PETRA will provide industry-representative Resin Control samples to testers. Each PETRA member will generate two conglomerate resin samples that represent the weighted average of its previous year s (Jan-Dec) sales volume of: PET resins intended for Water only, with no functional additives, such as barrier or UV blockers. PET resins intended for CSD only, with no functional additives, such as barrier or UV blockers. Each of these two sample types will be provided confidentially to PETRA. PETRA will then combine the submitted water-grade and CSD-grade samples to create representative industry Control Resin samples of each. The industry Water-grade Control Resin and the CSD-grade Control Resin will be maintained by PETRA and provided to any innovator or testing facility seeking to complete the Model s test protocol. 5

IV. Resin Supply Monitoring & Testing Upon prevalent industry use of this Model, PETRA will fund annual independent testing of the combined PET resin stream in order to monitor the on-going integrity of the virgin PET resin stream. Three distinct industry-representative samples will be generated and tested as part of this combined PET resin stream monitoring: Test Monitoring Sample 1 will consist of the industry representative Water-only Control Resin defined in Section III of the Model. Test Monitoring Sample 2 will consist of the industry representative CSD-only Control Resin defined in Section III of the Model. Test Monitoring Sample 3 will consist of all representative PET resin variants with and without any functional additives or barriers. Each PETRA member will generate and provide to PETRA these three distinct resin samples. The samples generated by each PETRA member will represent the previous year s (Jan-Dec) weighted average sales volume of each sample category. PETRA will then combine the member-supplied samples in each category to create industryrepresentative Test Monitoring Samples 1, 2, and 3. If a sufficient amount of the applicable Water-only and CSD-only Control Resins are available for testing, these Control Resins will be used as Test Monitoring Sample 1 and Test Monitoring Sample 2, respectively. The Test Monitoring Samples 1, 2 and 3 will each be tested through three heat histories, measuring IV drop, color/haze (3mm plaque) and SSP rate by an independent, accredited test laboratory. The resulting data will be made available to the recycling community and other interested parties by PETRA. References: APR Champions for Change, Critical Issues Guidance for Innovations, PET Bottle Critical Guidance Document, (Edition 5, May 2, 2011) EPBP Assessment Process Document, PET Recycling Test Protocol (October, 2011) 6

PETRA Recyclability & Innovation Model Test Protocol Diagram 1 Bottles of Control Resin Grind Wash Bottles of Innovation Resin Grind Wash Resin Blending Sample A1 Sample B1 (Opt 1, 2 or 3) Sample C1 (Opt 1, 2 or 3) 100% Control bottle flake 1A Control bottle flake 2A Control bottle flake 0% Innovation bottle flake 1B Innovation bottle flake 2B Innovation bottle flake Sample A2 Sample B2 Sample C2 Extrude/Pelletize/Crystallize Extrude/Pelletize/Crystallize Extrude/Pelletize/Crystallize Testing Testing Testing Sample A3 Sample A4 Sample B3 Sample B4 Sample C3 Sample C4 SSP 8 hr and SSP to 0.80 SSP 8 hr and SSP to 0.80 SSP 8 hr and SSP to 0.80 15 hr@205 C ±0.02 dl/g 15 hr@205 C ±0.02 dl/g 15 hr@205 C ±0.02 dl/g or higher or higher or higher Testing Testing Testing Plaque Molding Sample A5 Sample B5 Sample C5 50% Sample A4 50% Sample B4 50% Sample C4 50% Virgin Control 50% Virgin Control 50% Virgin Control Testing Testing Testing Notes: Innovators choice for testing based on technology Sample B1 Sample C1 Opt 1 Opt 2 Opt 3 Opt 1 Opt 2 Opt 3 1A 98% 90% 75% 2A 90% 75% 50% 1B 2% 10% 25% 2B 10% 25% 50% PET Resin Association, 2012 7