APPENDIX C - Florida Energy Code Standard Reference Design Auto-Generation Tests



Similar documents
New Homes EPS Modeling Frequently Asked Questions. Developed by Energy Trust of Oregon

RELEASE NOTES EG USA 3.0.0

IECC Compliance Guide for Homes in Virginia

How To Test A Building For An Icc 2006 Test Case

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Prescriptive Residential Re-roof Project Name:

ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 Cost & Savings Estimates

LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS IN EXISTING LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Building Energy Codes 101 October 23, Matthew Giudice Building Policy Associate Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

RESNET National Rater Test Study Guide Outline

Differentiating Energy Modeling Software!

APPENDIX C FORMS 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION C.1

Residential Weatherization Plus Program

Energy Analysis for Internal and External Window Film Applications for Existing Homes in Florida

Potential of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Savings To Impact Florida s Projected Energy Use in 2014

Analysis of 2009 International Energy Conservation Code Requirements for Residential Buildings in Kansas City, Missouri

CITY PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION. Lisa Fleming Brown, CPM

Preventing Ice Dams on Roofs

Certificate of Compliance ENV-1-C and Envelope Component Method ENV-2-C

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF INTERNATIONAL. (1) The Department of Labor and Industry adopts and incorporates by

Table 1: Prescriptive Envelope Requirements: Residential WOOD FRAME WALL R-VALUE MASS WALL R-VALUE CEILING R-VALUE

BUILDING SAFETY UNIT

2013 BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS

Mississippi. Energy and Cost Savings. for New Single and Multifamily Homes: 2009 and 2012 IECC as Compared to the 2006 IECC

Climate and Energy Responsive Housing in Continental Climates. The Suitability of Passive Houses for Iran's Dry and Cold Climate. Farshad Nasrollahi

Tennessee. Energy and Cost Savings. for New Single and Multifamily Homes: 2009 and 2012 IECC as Compared to the 2006 IECC

CALCS-PLUS Florida Building Code Energy Conservation Glitch Supplement

PERFORMANCE OF SIDE-BY-SIDE SOUTH TEXAS HOMES Isolating the Contribution of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation

Selecting Energy Efficient Replacement Windows in Nevada

Indiana Energy and Cost Savings

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Georgia

Colorado Energy and Cost Savings

HVAC INSTALLATION. Success with 2015 IECC Northeast & Mid-Atlantic. Checklist for Builders & Trades

PROTOCOL FOR BUILDING ENERGY ANALYSIS SOFTWARE For Class 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 buildings

HVAC INSTALLATION SUCCESS WITH 2012 IECC DELAWARE. for Builders & Trades. Recommended Practices for Optimized Energy Savings

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Arizona

) SIGNIFICANT CHANGES INCLUDING CODE COMMENTARY

HVAC Code Requirements

FLORIDA SOLAR ENERGY CENTER

The Potential for Energy Retrofits within the City of Sacramento s Rental Housing Inspection Program

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard Building Thermal Envelope and Fabric Load Tests

2009 IECC Update. Scope. Content. International Energy Conservation Code

California HERO Program Residential Eligible Product List

Residential Windows, 3 rd edition Corrected index 1

UNDERSTANDING AND USING THE HVAC DESIGN REVIEW FORM

Venice Library Humidity Study. for Williams Building Diagnostics, LLC th Street West Bradenton, FL Report April 13, 2015

Existing Housing Stock

Introduction to Energy Codes & Green Building Programs

How To Make A House Safe

EPA WaterSense for New Homes Program DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Quality Management Guidelines

Energy Efficiency in Buildings

This notice sets forth interim guidance, pending the issuance of regulations,

Residential HVAC System Sizing

Residential HVAC Load Sizing Training October 14, David Kaiser Green Code Plan Reviewer

2009 Seattle Energy Code Impacts: See below for a recap of Changes in Envelope performance from 2006 to 2009

KITCHEN AND BATH REMODELING BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

2012 Ontario Building Code Requirements for New Construction. Bradford West Gwillimbury Building Division March 5, 2012

California s Title 24 For Low-Slope Roofs. Building Energy Efficiency Standards

Sensitivity of Forced Air Distribution System Efficiency to Climate, Duct Location, Air Leakage and Insulation

Florida Building Code, 5th Edition (2014) June 30 th, 2015

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Market Potential Study for Water Heater Demand Management

Energy Savings in High-Rise Buildings Using High-Reflective Coatings

Cost-Effective, Energy-Efficient Home Improvements for Florida Homes August 8, 2012

Air Conditioning. The opportunity for energy efficiency. Low cost actions to reduce energy usage now

Residential Duct Systems for New and Retrofit Homes

Home Energy Evaluation Report for Fritz Kreiss and Catherine McQueen

HVAC Calculations and Duct Sizing

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS about HERS and CHEERS Provided by the California Energy Commission Consumer Energy Center

Development Services City of Lawrence, KS

Efficient use of energy simulation in the early design phase

Building Performance Evaluation Guide Version 1.7

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Florida

INSTALLATION GUIDELINES for SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS 1

PLAN REVIEW SERVICES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR A THOROUGH PLAN REVIEW

Home inspectors are not mold inspectors, however they do inspect for defects that

Strategy Guideline: Accurate Heating and Cooling Load Calculations

Energy Savings with Window Retrofits

CHAPTER 11: PASSIVE SOLAR HOMES

EFA PSBP. Natural Ventilation Strategy. Introduction. 1.1 Relevant legislation The Building Regulations 2010

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES to the 2015 Minnesota Residential Codes (MR 1303, 1309 and 1322)

6 Ceiling fans! Although they only use about as. 8 Redecorate. Hang lighter colored curtains

Air Conditioning Contractors of America

HOW TO CONDUCT ENERGY SAVINGS ANALYSIS IN A FACILITY VALUE ENGINEERING STUDY

Transcription:

REM/Rate v15 Review 9/22/14 Purpose This document includes the results of limited testing and verification of the REM/Rate v15.0 software submitted as a simulation tool for demonstrating compliance with Section 405 of the 2010 FL Building Code, Energy Conservation. The testing was limited to some of the basic requirements due to time constraints and did not fully cover all aspects of the 2010 FL Building Code or the TAM. FL Code 2010 Technical Assistance Manual (TAM) APPENDIX C - Florida Energy Code Standard Reference Design Auto-Generation Tests It appears as though the reference home can be exported to an Access database file, however, without labels this does not allow for the verifier or code official to readily verify the correct reference home is generated in accordance to the requirements of Table B-1.1.2(1) for use in the FL Code 2010 performance calculation. As a result the software does not appear to satisfy the requirements of Section C.1 Minimum Reporting Requirements. Additionally, a verifier does not have the capability to view the reference home and perform a 2010 FL Code calculation to verify the e-ratio of 1.00 or the Total Proposed Modified Loads should equal the Total Baseline Loads as required by the TAM. 6.1.1 Climate Data From the TAM: The compliance software program shall perform simulations using hourly values of climate data, such as temperature and humidity, derived from TMY3 (Typical Meteorological Year) climate data. The compliance software program shall calculate solar radiation on exterior surfaces on an hourly basis from the values of direct normal irradiance and diffuse horizontal irradiance contained in the climate data, taking ground reflectance into account. Climate criteria for the performance-based building code compliance methods are determined by climate data from all Florida TMY3 weather data collection stations. Energy Code calculations shall use the data collection site for the nearest city with respect to the building s location. Not clear that REM/Rate does this. 6.1.2 Florida Credit options Software does not appear to provide the following inputs. 405.6.2 Cool Roof Option The software does not provide the user a tested solar absorptance or reflectance input. Thus all entered values in the software are applied to the calculation based on color of roof without any user verification of having the tested results. Without this input the error checking is left up to the Code official to catch. o The requirement states: Page 1 of 6

405.6.2 Installation criteria for homes claiming the cool roof option. The cool roof option may be claimed where the roof to be installed has a tested solar reflectance of greater than 4 percent when evaluated in accordance with ASTM methods E 903, C 1549, E 1918 or CRRC Method #1. Emittance values provided by the roofing manufacturer in accordance with ASTM C 1371 shall be used when available. In cases where the appropriate data are not known, emittance shall be the same as the Standard Reference Design. Testing of a qualifying sample of the roofing material shall be performed by an approved independent laboratory with these results provided by the manufacturer. 6.1.2.4 Cross Ventilation Option REM/Rate does include a natural ventilation option, but does not include the Florida Code cross ventilation credit. 6.1.2.5 Whole House Fan Option The software seems to give a higher than expected benefit when a home includes a whole house fan (e.g., a 6.6% savings, where EnergyGauge gives 2.7%). Does REM/Rate include the energy use of the whole house fan as indicated in the TAM? o The requirement states: 405.6.5 Installation criteria for homes using the whole house fan option. The whole house fan option may be used if the following criteria have been met. 1. The whole house fan has been sized to provide a minimum of 20 air changes per hour for the entire house. 2. The fan installed shall have a free air cfm rating of at least three times the square footage of the conditioned area of the house. 3. To ensure adequate air exhaust, the house attic shall have gable, ridge or wind turbine vents whose total opening area is equal to four times the ceiling cutout area for the whole house fan. Soffit vents shall not be included in the exhaust vent area. o From the TAM: When the specified code criteria for whole house fan is met, either a default of 300W per hour, or a user specified and reported energy use value from the installed unit, shall be included in the cooling energy performance when the unit runs. An air change rate of 15 air changes per hour shall be modeled during times when the whole house fan is operated. The operation (on or off) of the unit shall not change from midnight to 6am. Page 2 of 6

FL Code 2010 Requirements Window SHGC REM/Rate Form 405-10 should indicate fail for an average SHGC higher than 0.5 but shows pass (as shown in the example below with an average SHGC of 0.6). Overhangs were at 0 for the example run. While an interim Mandatory Requirements screen does indicate SHGC failure, REM/Rate still allows Form 405 to be viewed and printed with a PASS indicated. o The requirement states: 402.5 Maximum fenestration SHGC (Mandatory). The area-weighted average maximum fenestration SHGC permitted using trade-offs from Section 405 shall be 0.50. Exception: If the window area-weighted average overhang depth for the entire dwelling unit is 4.0 feet or greater, the area-weighted average maximum SHGC requirement of 0.50 does not need to be met. Duct Leakage What duct system efficiency (DSE) is used for default ducts in the Proposed Home? o The default duct leakage options in the software are: leaky uninsulated, RESNET/HERS default, or proposed reduced leakage. Total Proposed Modified Loads vary significantly between the three options. FL Code 2010 requires the proposed home to include a DSE of 0.88 except when duct leakage is tested. The table below illustrates the Total Proposed Modified Loads for each default leakage selection in REM/Rate. None of these indicate testing is required. DUCT LEAKAGE TYPE TOTAL PROPOSED TOTAL BASELINE LOADS MODIFIED LOADS Leaky uninsulated 78.22 78.32 Page 3 of 6

RESNET/HERS default 71.83 78.32 Proposed reduced leakage 68.74 78.32 Proposed Home Generation The FL Code 2010 Proposed Home is not viewable to allow a code official to verify the proposed home is generated according to the requirements of Appendix B Table B-1.1.2(1) for use in the FL Code 2010 performance calculation. Adjacent Shading Inputs Total Proposed Modified Loads changes with the selection of adjacent shading. FL Building Code has only allowed permanent shading while REM/Rate Adjacent Shading includes trees and shrubs, nearby buildings and land forms according to their Help system. Form 405-10 Form 405-2010 does not include the Florida Seal. Lighting and Refrigerator Inputs In REM/Rate the lighting and refrigerator inputs change both the Total Proposed Modified Loads and Total Baseline Loads; however, these inputs should not be used in the calculations. (Refer to Appendix B Table B-1.1.2(1) which indicates a fixed Internal Gains based on square footage and bedrooms.) Worst Case Does not appear to make any difference to the Total Proposed Modified Loads when selected on Florida Code input screen. Does not provide a FL Code 2010 option under tools. Page 4 of 6

Mandatory Requirements Screen REM/Rate provides a Mandatory Requirements screen when calculating Performance (Form 405) compliance; however, a number of the requirements it lists are prescriptive, not required for Performance compliance. FL Code 2010 Reports Air Barrier and Insulation Inspection Component Criteria Checklist Air Distribution System Test Report Envelope Leakage Test Report EPL Card Page 5 of 6

Florida REM Rate Revisions from 14.5 Staff Review/Comments of Energy Compliance Software letter which includes REM Rate feedback The following items are from the Florida REM Rate Revisions document provided with the v14.5 software submissions. 39. The software does not provide an input for the user to identify a roof solar absorptance or reflectance has been tested according to the ASTM standard but provides credit anyhow. REM/Rate Answer - This is set via the roof color setting under the ceiling/roof summary inputs. The REM/Rate software does not have a solar absorptance or reflectance input. There are four roof options; Reflective, Light, Medium, Dark This does not satisfy the requirement for solar reflectance above 0.04 to be tested. The requirements state: 405.6.2 Installation criteria for homes claiming the cool roof option. The cool roof option may be claimed where the roof to be installed has a tested solar reflectance of greater than 4 percent when evaluated in accordance with ASTM methods E 903, C 1549, E 1918 or CRRC Method #1. Emittance values provided by the roofing manufacturer in accordance with ASTM C 1371 shall be used when available. In cases where the appropriate data are not known, emittance shall be the same as the Standard Reference Design. Testing of a qualifying sample of the roofing material shall be performed by an approved independent laboratory with these results provided by the manufacturer. General Concerns The user can currently perform calculations and generate reports with just a single wall input. Wall inputs do not have a cardinal orientation indicating less accuracy for solar gains. Page 6 of 6