2011 Judicial Evaluation Tarrant County Bar Association. Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox (www.ballotboxonline.com) Name



Similar documents
2013 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the Tarrant County Bar Association, we are

Chief Judge of the State of New York. Chief Administrative Judge. Deputy Chief Administrative Judge (Management Support)

2016 GENERAL. Election Date: 11/08/2016

THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER Judicial Survey Results

2014 SUMMER SCHOOL FOR LAWYERS June 23-25, 2014 Sandestin, Florida Linkside Conference Center MONDAY, JUNE 23 RD

Guide for Florida Voters

2016 SUMMER EXTERNSHIPS THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Distinguished Professor of Judicial Studies, Washington and Lee University School of Law, 2007 present)

Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas)

Election Summary Report Wayne County, Ohio General Election November 4, 2008 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races OFFICIAL RESULTS

Law In Colorado Colorado Bar Association Public Legal Education Committee 2004

APPROVED for 8.0 CLE Credits 3.0 Ethics. Clarion Hotel & Conference Center 701 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631

New Directions new challenges

Date: 2/25/2014 2:40 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN User: Raechelle

FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: February 28, 2011 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4.3 (a) REAPPOINTMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AND APPOINT NEW JUDGES PRO TEMPORE

L. CLIFFORD DAVIS LEGAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER VOL I - ISSUE 1 - DECEMBER 2014 L.C.D.LA Board

2nd Circuit Drug Court Est. August 1, th Circuit Drug Court

PETERSON, JOHNSON & MURRAY, S.C. 788 North Jefferson Street Suite 500 Milwaukee, Wisconsin P: F:

Elkins Family Law Task Force

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133

1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. No. A REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF TEXAS. 55 S.W.3d 243; 2000 Tex. LEXIS 83

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEST LAWYERS RECOGNIZES 77 MVA ATTORNEYS. August 2013

MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25

HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF

Turning the Tide: Strategies For Defending Domestic Violence

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COUNCIL MADISON, WISCONSIN April 16, 2010

How To Make An Animal Cruelty Case In The United States

Lawrence D. Finder. Practice description. Practice focus

Consolidated Case Nos. 04SA396 and 05SA22, State of Colorado v. City and County of Denver and Sternberg v. City and County of Denver.

CRAVEN BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:12-cv VMC-TGW

Misc Docket No

WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List

WITNESS LIST. Criminal Justice March 10, :30 PM - or upon adjournment

U.S. DISTRICT COURT - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Applicable General Orders Index - 4/1/98

CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV /02/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES

STATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF

Misc Docket No

Misc. Docket No. Il Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action

Case Document 73 Filed in TXSB on 04/19/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

The NH Court System excerpts taken from

HOW TO LODGE AN APPEAL AGAINST A CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AWARD IN THE DISTRICT COURT

Medina County Domestic Relations Court Detail Schedule Jackie Owen:

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 95-

The Texas Judicial System. Criminal Appeals, in Courts of Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in

Written Testimony to Texas House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence - Subcommittee on Asbestos

Misc Docket No

UNPUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION

PROGRAM AGENDA. 6:00 PM 7:00 PM Welcome Reception (for conference registrants, spouses/guests and children)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff,

The Weld County Bar Association, Inc. and the 19th Judicial District Bench-Bar Committee are pleased to present the 8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE.

Case Doc 352 Filed 05/31/12 Entered 05/31/12 12:23:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSc Docket No. 99m 9047

Date: 10/15/ :36 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN User: Raechelle

Justice Information Management Systems (JIMS)

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1

RICHARD A. BROWN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY

James W. McElhaney, McElhaney s Trial Notebook. R. Lawrence Dessem, Pretrial Litigation in a Nutshell

CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY PAGE 1 10/02/15 14:45

EVELYN V. KEYES 3655 PIPING ROCK HOUSTON, TEXAS (TEL.) (713) (CELL) (FAX) (713)

SARASOTA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION

Keldon K. Scott Curriculum Vitae

PETER J. ECKERSTROM 400 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona Office phone: (520)

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Registering, but not testifying: For:

APPROVED MEDIATORS LIST

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, September 09, 1997 No. 02C CR Appellant )

MAYOR DE BLASIO APPOINTS 26 JUDGES TO FAMILY, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURT

CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

Minutes. Pretrial Justice Working Group Criminal Justice System Subcommittee March 20, 2012

How To Become A Court Appointed Attorney

Appendix E. Access to Justice Hearing October 25, 2007 Colorado Springs, Colorado

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT JUVENILE JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL January 27, 2015

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 96-9i72

DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEADQUARTERS

The North Carolina DA List

Transcription:

Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox () Name 2011 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the, we are Online Voting 03/07/11 02:15pm CST to 03/28/11 05:00pm CDT Voter Information Eligible Voters 2541 Cast Online Ballots 315 Blank Online Ballots 19 % of eligible voters 12.40% 0.75% Report Information 1: Federal Courts Federal Courts Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. John McBryde (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) 131 41.59% 39.46% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Terry R. Means (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) 130 41.27% 39.16% Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) 35 11.11% 10.54% Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) 36 11.43% 10.84% 332 100.00% 2: State Appellate Courts State Appellate Courts Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Terrie Livingston (Chief Justice, Second Court of Appeals) 146 46.35% 18.41% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) 120 38.10% 15.13% Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) 132 41.90% 16.65% Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) 141 44.76% 17.78% Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) 155 49.21% 19.55% Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) 99 31.43% 12.48% 793 100.00% 3: State District Courts Civil State District Courts - Civil Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Melody Wilkinson (Judge, 17th District Court) 160 50.79% 12.85% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. David Evans (Judge, 48th District Court) 159 50.48% 12.77% Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, 67th District Court) 160 50.79% 12.85% Hon. John Chupp (Judge, 141st District Court) 126 40.00% 10.12% Hon. Ken Curry (Judge, 153rd District Court) 153 48.57% 12.29% Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, 236th District Court) 153 48.57% 12.29% Hon. Dana Womack (Judge, 348th District Court) 167 53.02% 13.41% Hon. Bonnie Sudderth (Judge, 352nd District Court) 167 53.02% 13.41% 1245 100.00% 4: State District Courts - FamState District Courts - Family Page 1 of 70

Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Randy Catterton (Judge, 231st District Court) 140 44.44% 9.87% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate Judge, 231st District Court) 110 34.92% 7.75% Hon. William Harris (Judge, 233rd District Court) 129 40.95% 9.09% Hon. Diane Haddock (Associate Judge, 233rd District Court) 103 32.70% 7.26% Hon. Nancy Berger (Judge, 322nd District Court) 128 40.63% 9.02% Hon. James Munford (Associate Judge, 322nd District Court) 97 30.79% 6.84% Hon. Jerome Hennigan (Judge, 324th District Court) 125 39.68% 8.81% Hon. Beth Poulos (Associate Judge, 324th District Court) 97 30.79% 6.84% Hon. Judith Wells (Judge, 325th District Court) 122 38.73% 8.60% Hon. Terri White (Associate Judge, 325th District Court) 92 29.21% 6.48% Hon. Michael Sinha (Associate Judge, 360th District Court) 116 36.83% 8.17% Hon. Steve Owen (Associate Judge, IV-D Court) 87 27.62% 6.13% Hon. Clifford Bronson (Associate Judge, IV-D Court) 73 23.17% 5.14% 1419 100.00% 5: State District Courts - JuvState District Courts - Juvenile Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Jean Boyd (Judge, 323rd District Court) 92 29.21% 40.53% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Ellen Smith (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) 47 14.92% 20.70% Hon. Tim Menikos (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) 43 13.65% 18.94% Hon. Kim Brown (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) 45 14.29% 19.82% 227 100.00% 6: State District Courts - CrimState District COURTS - Criminal Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Sharen Wilson (Judge, Criminal District #1) 77 24.44% 10.50% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Wayne Salvant (Judge, Criminal District #2) 68 21.59% 9.28% Hon. Michael Thomas (Judge, Criminal District #4) 61 19.37% 8.32% Hon. Louis Sturns (Judge, 213th District Court) 71 22.54% 9.69% Hon. Everett Young (Judge, 297th District Court) 70 22.22% 9.55% Hon. Molly Westfall (Judge 371st District Court) 50 15.87% 6.82% Hon. Scott Wisch (Judge, 372nd District Court) 63 20.00% 8.59% Hon. George Gallagher (Judge, 396th District Court) 69 21.90% 9.41% Hon. Ruben Gonzalez (Judge 432nd District Court) 58 18.41% 7.91% Hon. Gene Grant (Judge, Magistrate Court) 40 12.70% 5.46% Hon. Cheyenne Minick (Judge, Magistrate Court) 39 12.38% 5.32% Hon. Timmie White (Judge, Magistrate Court) 35 11.11% 4.77% Hon. Matt King (Judge, Magistrate Court) 32 10.16% 4.37% 733 100.00% 7: County Courts - Civil County Courts - Civil Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Jennifer Rymell (Judge, Court at Law #2) 145 46.03% 100.00% No. of Respondents 315 145 100.00% Page 2 of 70

8: County Courts - Criminal County Courts - Criminal Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Sherry Hill (Judge, Criminal Court #1) 55 17.46% 10.46% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Michael Mitchell (Judge, Criminal Court #2) 58 18.41% 11.03% Hon. Billy Mills (Judge, Criminal Court #3) 64 20.32% 12.17% Hon. Deborah Nekhom (Judge, Criminal Court #4) 46 14.60% 8.75% Hon. Jamie Cummings (Judge, Criminal Court #5) 45 14.29% 8.56% Hon. Molly Jones (Judge, Criminal Court #6) 40 12.70% 7.60% Hon. Cheril Hardy (Judge, Criminal Court #7) 58 18.41% 11.03% Hon. Daryl Coffey (Judge, Criminal Court #8) 52 16.51% 9.89% Hon. Brent Carr (Judge, Criminal Court #9) 59 18.73% 11.22% Hon. Phil Sorrells (Judge, Criminal Court #10) 49 15.56% 9.32% 526 100.00% 9: County Courts - Probate County Courts - Probate Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Steve King (Judge, Probate Court #1) 147 46.67% 31.82% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Quentin McGown (Associate Judge, Probate Court #1) 70 22.22% 15.15% Hon. Patrick Ferchill (Judge, Probate Court #2) 158 50.16% 34.20% Hon. Lin Morrisett (Associate Judge, Probate Court #2) 87 27.62% 18.83% 462 100.00% 10: McBryde- all 10.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 64 48.85% 48.85% No. of Respondents 131 No 62 47.33% 47.33% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion 5 3.82% 3.82% % of Ballots 41.59% 131 100.00% 100.00% 10.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 28.24% 28.24% No. of Respondents 131 No 90 68.70% 68.70% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion 4 3.05% 3.05% % of Ballots 41.59% 131 100.00% 100.00% 10.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 69 52.67% 52.67% No. of Respondents 131 No 54 41.22% 41.22% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion 8 6.11% 6.11% % of Ballots 41.59% 131 100.00% 100.00% 10.4: timeliness Page 3 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 125 95.42% 95.42% No. of Respondents 131 No 2 1.53% 1.53% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion 4 3.05% 3.05% % of Ballots 41.59% 131 100.00% 100.00% 10.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 103 78.63% 78.63% No. of Respondents 131 No 15 11.45% 11.45% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion 13 9.92% 9.92% % of Ballots 41.59% 131 100.00% 100.00% 10.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 38 29.01% 29.01% No. of Respondents 131 No 89 67.94% 67.94% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion 4 3.05% 3.05% % of Ballots 41.59% 131 100.00% 100.00% 10.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 22 16.79% 16.79% No. of Respondents 131 Good 20 15.27% 15.27% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McFair 26 19.85% 19.85% % of Ballots 41.59% Poor 63 48.09% 48.09% 131 100.00% 11: Means - all 11.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 125 96.15% 96.15% No. of Respondents 130 No 2 1.54% 1.54% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion 3 2.31% 2.31% % of Ballots 41.27% 130 100.00% 100.00% 11.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 125 96.15% 96.15% No. of Respondents 130 No 1 0.77% 0.77% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion 4 3.08% 3.08% % of Ballots 41.27% 130 100.00% 100.00% 11.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 118 90.77% 90.77% No. of Respondents 130 No 5 3.85% 3.85% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion 7 5.38% 5.38% Page 4 of 70

% of Ballots 41.27% 130 100.00% 100.00% 11.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 102 78.46% 78.46% No. of Respondents 130 No 21 16.15% 16.15% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion 7 5.38% 5.38% % of Ballots 41.27% 130 100.00% 100.00% 11.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 106 81.54% 81.54% No. of Respondents 130 No 15 11.54% 11.54% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion 9 6.92% 6.92% % of Ballots 41.27% 130 100.00% 100.00% 11.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 120 92.31% 92.31% No. of Respondents 130 No 5 3.85% 3.85% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion 5 3.85% 3.85% % of Ballots 41.27% 130 100.00% 100.00% 11.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 93 71.54% 71.54% No. of Respondents 130 Good 30 23.08% 23.08% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R Fair 6 4.62% 4.62% % of Ballots 41.27% Poor 1 0.77% 0.77% 130 100.00% 12: Lynn- all 12.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 29 82.86% 82.86% No. of Respondents 35 No 4 11.43% 11.43% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion 2 5.71% 5.71% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 12.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 29 82.86% 82.86% No. of Respondents 35 No 4 11.43% 11.43% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion 2 5.71% 5.71% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 12.3: apply Page 5 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 25 71.43% 71.43% No. of Respondents 35 No 6 17.14% 17.14% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion 4 11.43% 11.43% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 12.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 30 85.71% 85.71% No. of Respondents 35 No 3 8.57% 8.57% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion 2 5.71% 5.71% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 12.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 27 77.14% 77.14% No. of Respondents 35 No 3 8.57% 8.57% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion 5 14.29% 14.29% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 12.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 35 No 6 17.14% 17.14% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion 1 2.86% 2.86% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 12.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 15 42.86% 42.86% No. of Respondents 35 Good 14 40.00% 40.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Fair 3 8.57% 8.57% % of Ballots 11.11% Poor 3 8.57% 8.57% 35 100.00% 13: Nelms- all 13.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 91.67% 91.67% No. of Respondents 36 No 1 2.78% 2.78% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion 2 5.56% 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% 36 100.00% 100.00% 13.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 94.44% 94.44% No. of Respondents 36 No 0 0.00% 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion 2 5.56% 5.56% Page 6 of 70

% of Ballots 11.43% 36 100.00% 100.00% 13.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 30 83.33% 83.33% No. of Respondents 36 No 2 5.56% 5.56% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion 4 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 11.43% 36 100.00% 100.00% 13.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 32 88.89% 88.89% No. of Respondents 36 No 0 0.00% 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion 4 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 11.43% 36 100.00% 100.00% 13.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 94.44% 94.44% No. of Respondents 36 No 0 0.00% 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion 2 5.56% 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% 36 100.00% 100.00% 13.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 91.67% 91.67% No. of Respondents 36 No 1 2.78% 2.78% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion 2 5.56% 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% 36 100.00% 100.00% 13.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 23 63.89% 63.89% No. of Respondents 36 Good 10 27.78% 27.78% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Fair 2 5.56% 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% Poor 1 2.78% 2.78% 36 100.00% 14: Livingston- app 14.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes 136 93.15% 93.15% No. of Respondents 146 No 7 4.79% 4.79% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion 3 2.05% 2.05% % of Ballots 46.35% 146 100.00% 100.00% 14.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Page 7 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 133 91.10% 91.10% No. of Respondents 146 No 3 2.05% 2.05% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion 10 6.85% 6.85% % of Ballots 46.35% 146 100.00% 100.00% 14.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes 121 82.88% 82.88% No. of Respondents 146 No 21 14.38% 14.38% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion 4 2.74% 2.74% % of Ballots 46.35% 146 100.00% 100.00% 14.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes 108 73.97% 73.97% No. of Respondents 146 No 19 13.01% 13.01% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion 19 13.01% 13.01% % of Ballots 46.35% 146 100.00% 100.00% 14.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes 125 85.62% 85.62% No. of Respondents 146 No 15 10.27% 10.27% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion 6 4.11% 4.11% % of Ballots 46.35% 146 100.00% 100.00% 14.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 82 56.16% 56.16% No. of Respondents 146 Good 41 28.08% 28.08% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie L Fair 15 10.27% 10.27% % of Ballots 46.35% Poor 8 5.48% 5.48% 146 100.00% 15: Dauphinot- app 15.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes 96 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 120 No 17 14.17% 14.17% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion 7 5.83% 5.83% % of Ballots 38.10% 120 100.00% 100.00% 15.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes 90 75.00% 75.00% No. of Respondents 120 No 17 14.17% 14.17% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion 13 10.83% 10.83% Page 8 of 70

% of Ballots 38.10% 120 100.00% 100.00% 15.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes 68 56.67% 56.67% No. of Respondents 120 No 36 30.00% 30.00% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion 16 13.33% 13.33% % of Ballots 38.10% 120 100.00% 100.00% 15.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes 77 64.17% 64.17% No. of Respondents 120 No 16 13.33% 13.33% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion 27 22.50% 22.50% % of Ballots 38.10% 120 100.00% 100.00% 15.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes 85 70.83% 70.83% No. of Respondents 120 No 22 18.33% 18.33% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion 13 10.83% 10.83% % of Ballots 38.10% 120 100.00% 100.00% 15.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 31 25.83% 25.83% No. of Respondents 120 Good 44 36.67% 36.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnFair 31 25.83% 25.83% % of Ballots 38.10% Poor 14 11.67% 11.67% 120 100.00% 16: Gardner - app 16.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes 125 94.70% 94.70% No. of Respondents 132 No 5 3.79% 3.79% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion 2 1.52% 1.52% % of Ballots 41.90% 132 100.00% 100.00% 16.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes 118 89.39% 89.39% No. of Respondents 132 No 4 3.03% 3.03% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion 10 7.58% 7.58% % of Ballots 41.90% 132 100.00% 100.00% 16.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Page 9 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 105 79.55% 79.55% No. of Respondents 132 No 17 12.88% 12.88% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion 10 7.58% 7.58% % of Ballots 41.90% 132 100.00% 100.00% 16.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes 89 67.42% 67.42% No. of Respondents 132 No 21 15.91% 15.91% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion 22 16.67% 16.67% % of Ballots 41.90% 132 100.00% 100.00% 16.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes 113 85.61% 85.61% No. of Respondents 132 No 9 6.82% 6.82% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion 10 7.58% 7.58% % of Ballots 41.90% 132 100.00% 100.00% 16.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 72 54.55% 54.55% No. of Respondents 132 Good 37 28.03% 28.03% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaFair 18 13.64% 13.64% % of Ballots 41.90% Poor 5 3.79% 3.79% 132 100.00% 17: Walker- app 17.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes 131 92.91% 92.91% No. of Respondents 141 No 6 4.26% 4.26% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion 4 2.84% 2.84% % of Ballots 44.76% 141 100.00% 100.00% 17.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes 124 87.94% 87.94% No. of Respondents 141 No 4 2.84% 2.84% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion 13 9.22% 9.22% % of Ballots 44.76% 141 100.00% 100.00% 17.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes 118 83.69% 83.69% No. of Respondents 141 No 13 9.22% 9.22% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion 10 7.09% 7.09% Page 10 of 70

% of Ballots 44.76% 141 100.00% 100.00% 17.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes 114 80.85% 80.85% No. of Respondents 141 No 9 6.38% 6.38% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion 18 12.77% 12.77% % of Ballots 44.76% 141 100.00% 100.00% 17.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes 126 89.36% 89.36% No. of Respondents 141 No 8 5.67% 5.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion 7 4.96% 4.96% % of Ballots 44.76% 141 100.00% 100.00% 17.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 101 71.63% 71.63% No. of Respondents 141 Good 26 18.44% 18.44% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa Fair 7 4.96% 4.96% % of Ballots 44.76% Poor 7 4.96% 4.96% 141 100.00% 18: McCoy- app 18.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes 145 93.55% 93.55% No. of Respondents 155 No 7 4.52% 4.52% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion 3 1.94% 1.94% % of Ballots 49.21% 155 100.00% 100.00% 18.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes 131 84.52% 84.52% No. of Respondents 155 No 11 7.10% 7.10% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion 13 8.39% 8.39% % of Ballots 49.21% 155 100.00% 100.00% 18.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes 127 81.94% 81.94% No. of Respondents 155 No 19 12.26% 12.26% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion 9 5.81% 5.81% % of Ballots 49.21% 155 100.00% 100.00% 18.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Page 11 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 122 78.71% 78.71% No. of Respondents 155 No 10 6.45% 6.45% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion 23 14.84% 14.84% % of Ballots 49.21% 155 100.00% 100.00% 18.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes 138 89.03% 89.03% No. of Respondents 155 No 11 7.10% 7.10% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion 6 3.87% 3.87% % of Ballots 49.21% 155 100.00% 100.00% 18.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 95 61.29% 61.29% No. of Respondents 155 Good 42 27.10% 27.10% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCFair 10 6.45% 6.45% % of Ballots 49.21% Poor 8 5.16% 5.16% 155 100.00% 19: Meier - app 19.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes 81 81.82% 81.82% No. of Respondents 99 No 7 7.07% 7.07% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion 11 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 31.43% 99 100.00% 100.00% 19.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes 75 75.76% 75.76% No. of Respondents 99 No 6 6.06% 6.06% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion 18 18.18% 18.18% % of Ballots 31.43% 99 100.00% 100.00% 19.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 59.60% 59.60% No. of Respondents 99 No 16 16.16% 16.16% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion 24 24.24% 24.24% % of Ballots 31.43% 99 100.00% 100.00% 19.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes 63 63.64% 63.64% No. of Respondents 99 No 8 8.08% 8.08% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion 28 28.28% 28.28% Page 12 of 70

% of Ballots 31.43% 99 100.00% 100.00% 19.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes 74 74.75% 74.75% No. of Respondents 99 No 9 9.09% 9.09% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion 16 16.16% 16.16% % of Ballots 31.43% 99 100.00% 100.00% 19.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 35 35.35% 35.35% No. of Respondents 99 Good 36 36.36% 36.36% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieFair 19 19.19% 19.19% % of Ballots 31.43% Poor 9 9.09% 9.09% 99 100.00% 20: Wilkinson- all 20.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 141 88.13% 88.13% No. of Respondents 160 No 10 6.25% 6.25% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion 9 5.63% 5.63% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 20.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 141 88.13% 88.13% No. of Respondents 160 No 11 6.88% 6.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion 8 5.00% 5.00% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 20.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 114 71.25% 71.25% No. of Respondents 160 No 23 14.38% 14.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion 23 14.38% 14.38% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 20.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 117 73.13% 73.13% No. of Respondents 160 No 16 10.00% 10.00% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion 27 16.88% 16.88% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 20.5: efficient Page 13 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 127 79.38% 79.38% No. of Respondents 160 No 19 11.88% 11.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion 14 8.75% 8.75% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 20.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 134 83.75% 83.75% No. of Respondents 160 No 13 8.13% 8.13% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion 13 8.13% 8.13% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 20.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 82 51.25% 51.25% No. of Respondents 160 Good 46 28.75% 28.75% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Fair 23 14.38% 14.38% % of Ballots 50.79% Poor 9 5.63% 5.63% 160 100.00% 21: Evans- all 21.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 136 85.53% 85.53% No. of Respondents 159 No 17 10.69% 10.69% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion 6 3.77% 3.77% % of Ballots 50.48% 159 100.00% 100.00% 21.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 119 74.84% 74.84% No. of Respondents 159 No 31 19.50% 19.50% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion 9 5.66% 5.66% % of Ballots 50.48% 159 100.00% 100.00% 21.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 125 78.62% 78.62% No. of Respondents 159 No 25 15.72% 15.72% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion 9 5.66% 5.66% % of Ballots 50.48% 159 100.00% 100.00% 21.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 134 84.28% 84.28% No. of Respondents 159 No 18 11.32% 11.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion 7 4.40% 4.40% Page 14 of 70

% of Ballots 50.48% 159 100.00% 100.00% 21.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 134 84.28% 84.28% No. of Respondents 159 No 20 12.58% 12.58% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion 5 3.14% 3.14% % of Ballots 50.48% 159 100.00% 100.00% 21.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 118 74.21% 74.21% No. of Respondents 159 No 33 20.75% 20.75% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion 8 5.03% 5.03% % of Ballots 50.48% 159 100.00% 100.00% 21.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 80 50.31% 50.31% No. of Respondents 159 Good 48 30.19% 30.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E Fair 16 10.06% 10.06% % of Ballots 50.48% Poor 15 9.43% 9.43% 159 100.00% 22: Cosby- all 22.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 143 89.38% 89.38% No. of Respondents 160 No 10 6.25% 6.25% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion 7 4.38% 4.38% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 22.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 145 90.63% 90.63% No. of Respondents 160 No 11 6.88% 6.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion 4 2.50% 2.50% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 22.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 124 77.50% 77.50% No. of Respondents 160 No 27 16.88% 16.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion 9 5.63% 5.63% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 22.4: timeliness Page 15 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 140 87.50% 87.50% No. of Respondents 160 No 14 8.75% 8.75% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion 6 3.75% 3.75% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 22.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 140 87.50% 87.50% No. of Respondents 160 No 15 9.38% 9.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion 5 3.13% 3.13% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 22.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 128 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 160 No 23 14.38% 14.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion 9 5.63% 5.63% % of Ballots 50.79% 160 100.00% 100.00% 22.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 97 60.63% 60.63% No. of Respondents 160 Good 33 20.63% 20.63% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosFair 16 10.00% 10.00% % of Ballots 50.79% Poor 14 8.75% 8.75% 160 100.00% 23: Chupp- all 23.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 106 84.13% 84.13% No. of Respondents 126 No 11 8.73% 8.73% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion 9 7.14% 7.14% % of Ballots 40.00% 126 100.00% 100.00% 23.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 105 83.33% 83.33% No. of Respondents 126 No 13 10.32% 10.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion 8 6.35% 6.35% % of Ballots 40.00% 126 100.00% 100.00% 23.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 81 64.29% 64.29% No. of Respondents 126 No 25 19.84% 19.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion 20 15.87% 15.87% Page 16 of 70

% of Ballots 40.00% 126 100.00% 100.00% 23.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 90 71.43% 71.43% No. of Respondents 126 No 19 15.08% 15.08% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion 17 13.49% 13.49% % of Ballots 40.00% 126 100.00% 100.00% 23.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 99 78.57% 78.57% No. of Respondents 126 No 13 10.32% 10.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion 14 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 40.00% 126 100.00% 100.00% 23.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 106 84.13% 84.13% No. of Respondents 126 No 13 10.32% 10.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion 7 5.56% 5.56% % of Ballots 40.00% 126 100.00% 100.00% 23.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 60 47.62% 47.62% No. of Respondents 126 Good 39 30.95% 30.95% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChFair 14 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 40.00% Poor 13 10.32% 10.32% 126 100.00% 24: Curry- all 24.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 140 91.50% 91.50% No. of Respondents 153 No 11 7.19% 7.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion 2 1.31% 1.31% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 24.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 142 92.81% 92.81% No. of Respondents 153 No 8 5.23% 5.23% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion 3 1.96% 1.96% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 24.3: apply Page 17 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 129 84.31% 84.31% No. of Respondents 153 No 18 11.76% 11.76% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion 6 3.92% 3.92% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 24.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 134 87.58% 87.58% No. of Respondents 153 No 13 8.50% 8.50% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion 6 3.92% 3.92% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 24.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 133 86.93% 86.93% No. of Respondents 153 No 16 10.46% 10.46% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion 4 2.61% 2.61% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 24.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 135 88.24% 88.24% No. of Respondents 153 No 15 9.80% 9.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion 3 1.96% 1.96% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 24.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 93 60.78% 60.78% No. of Respondents 153 Good 39 25.49% 25.49% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurFair 11 7.19% 7.19% % of Ballots 48.57% Poor 10 6.54% 6.54% 153 100.00% 25: Lowe- all 25.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 105 68.63% 68.63% No. of Respondents 153 No 42 27.45% 27.45% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion 6 3.92% 3.92% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 25.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 107 69.93% 69.93% No. of Respondents 153 No 40 26.14% 26.14% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion 6 3.92% 3.92% Page 18 of 70

% of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 25.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 87 56.86% 56.86% No. of Respondents 153 No 53 34.64% 34.64% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion 13 8.50% 8.50% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 25.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 97 63.40% 63.40% No. of Respondents 153 No 41 26.80% 26.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion 15 9.80% 9.80% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 25.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 93 60.78% 60.78% No. of Respondents 153 No 47 30.72% 30.72% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion 13 8.50% 8.50% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 25.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 93 60.78% 60.78% No. of Respondents 153 No 48 31.37% 31.37% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion 12 7.84% 7.84% % of Ballots 48.57% 153 100.00% 100.00% 25.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 47 30.72% 30.72% No. of Respondents 153 Good 38 24.84% 24.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowFair 28 18.30% 18.30% % of Ballots 48.57% Poor 40 26.14% 26.14% 153 100.00% 26: Womack- all 26.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 160 95.81% 95.81% No. of Respondents 167 No 6 3.59% 3.59% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion 1 0.60% 0.60% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 26.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Page 19 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 158 94.61% 94.61% No. of Respondents 167 No 7 4.19% 4.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion 2 1.20% 1.20% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 26.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 148 88.62% 88.62% No. of Respondents 167 No 13 7.78% 7.78% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion 6 3.59% 3.59% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 26.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 149 89.22% 89.22% No. of Respondents 167 No 10 5.99% 5.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion 8 4.79% 4.79% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 26.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 148 88.62% 88.62% No. of Respondents 167 No 10 5.99% 5.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion 9 5.39% 5.39% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 26.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 149 89.22% 89.22% No. of Respondents 167 No 9 5.39% 5.39% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion 9 5.39% 5.39% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 26.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 127 76.05% 76.05% No. of Respondents 167 Good 29 17.37% 17.37% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WFair 6 3.59% 3.59% % of Ballots 53.02% Poor 5 2.99% 2.99% 167 100.00% 27: Sudderth- all 27.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 154 92.22% 92.22% No. of Respondents 167 No 10 5.99% 5.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion 3 1.80% 1.80% Page 20 of 70

% of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 27.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 150 89.82% 89.82% No. of Respondents 167 No 12 7.19% 7.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion 5 2.99% 2.99% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 27.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 142 85.03% 85.03% No. of Respondents 167 No 15 8.98% 8.98% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion 10 5.99% 5.99% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 27.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 133 79.64% 79.64% No. of Respondents 167 No 22 13.17% 13.17% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion 12 7.19% 7.19% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 27.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 137 82.04% 82.04% No. of Respondents 167 No 19 11.38% 11.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion 11 6.59% 6.59% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 27.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 148 88.62% 88.62% No. of Respondents 167 No 13 7.78% 7.78% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion 6 3.59% 3.59% % of Ballots 53.02% 167 100.00% 100.00% 27.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 92 55.09% 55.09% No. of Respondents 167 Good 59 35.33% 35.33% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Fair 9 5.39% 5.39% % of Ballots 53.02% Poor 7 4.19% 4.19% 167 100.00% 28: Catterton- all 28.1: integrity Page 21 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 127 90.71% 90.71% No. of Respondents 140 No 13 9.29% 9.29% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 44.44% 140 100.00% 100.00% 28.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 131 93.57% 93.57% No. of Respondents 140 No 7 5.00% 5.00% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion 2 1.43% 1.43% % of Ballots 44.44% 140 100.00% 100.00% 28.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 123 87.86% 87.86% No. of Respondents 140 No 14 10.00% 10.00% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion 3 2.14% 2.14% % of Ballots 44.44% 140 100.00% 100.00% 28.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 123 87.86% 87.86% No. of Respondents 140 No 13 9.29% 9.29% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion 4 2.86% 2.86% % of Ballots 44.44% 140 100.00% 100.00% 28.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 113 80.71% 80.71% No. of Respondents 140 No 19 13.57% 13.57% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion 8 5.71% 5.71% % of Ballots 44.44% 140 100.00% 100.00% 28.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 122 87.14% 87.14% No. of Respondents 140 No 15 10.71% 10.71% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion 3 2.14% 2.14% % of Ballots 44.44% 140 100.00% 100.00% 28.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 106 75.71% 75.71% No. of Respondents 140 Good 18 12.86% 12.86% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CFair 10 7.14% 7.14% % of Ballots 44.44% Poor 6 4.29% 4.29% 140 100.00% Page 22 of 70

29: Beebe- all 29.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 81 73.64% 73.64% No. of Respondents 110 No 21 19.09% 19.09% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion 8 7.27% 7.27% % of Ballots 34.92% 110 100.00% 100.00% 29.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 66 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 110 No 39 35.45% 35.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion 5 4.55% 4.55% % of Ballots 34.92% 110 100.00% 100.00% 29.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 72 65.45% 65.45% No. of Respondents 110 No 30 27.27% 27.27% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion 8 7.27% 7.27% % of Ballots 34.92% 110 100.00% 100.00% 29.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 93 84.55% 84.55% No. of Respondents 110 No 13 11.82% 11.82% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion 4 3.64% 3.64% % of Ballots 34.92% 110 100.00% 100.00% 29.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 79 71.82% 71.82% No. of Respondents 110 No 26 23.64% 23.64% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion 5 4.55% 4.55% % of Ballots 34.92% 110 100.00% 100.00% 29.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 79 71.82% 71.82% No. of Respondents 110 No 24 21.82% 21.82% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion 7 6.36% 6.36% % of Ballots 34.92% 110 100.00% 100.00% 29.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 45 40.91% 40.91% No. of Respondents 110 Good 26 23.64% 23.64% Page 23 of 70

Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeFair 23 20.91% 20.91% % of Ballots 34.92% Poor 16 14.55% 14.55% 110 100.00% 30: Harris - all 30.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 78 60.47% 60.47% No. of Respondents 129 No 48 37.21% 37.21% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion 3 2.33% 2.33% % of Ballots 40.95% 129 100.00% 100.00% 30.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 61 47.29% 47.29% No. of Respondents 129 No 64 49.61% 49.61% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion 4 3.10% 3.10% % of Ballots 40.95% 129 100.00% 100.00% 30.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 80 62.02% 62.02% No. of Respondents 129 No 38 29.46% 29.46% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion 11 8.53% 8.53% % of Ballots 40.95% 129 100.00% 100.00% 30.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 106 82.17% 82.17% No. of Respondents 129 No 15 11.63% 11.63% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion 8 6.20% 6.20% % of Ballots 40.95% 129 100.00% 100.00% 30.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 102 79.07% 79.07% No. of Respondents 129 No 18 13.95% 13.95% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion 9 6.98% 6.98% % of Ballots 40.95% 129 100.00% 100.00% 30.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 68 52.71% 52.71% No. of Respondents 129 No 52 40.31% 40.31% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion 9 6.98% 6.98% % of Ballots 40.95% 129 100.00% 100.00% Page 24 of 70

30.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 43 33.33% 33.33% No. of Respondents 129 Good 28 21.71% 21.71% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Fair 25 19.38% 19.38% % of Ballots 40.95% Poor 33 25.58% 25.58% 129 100.00% 31: Haddock - all 31.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 80 77.67% 77.67% No. of Respondents 103 No 19 18.45% 18.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion 4 3.88% 3.88% % of Ballots 32.70% 103 100.00% 100.00% 31.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 67 65.05% 65.05% No. of Respondents 103 No 31 30.10% 30.10% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion 5 4.85% 4.85% % of Ballots 32.70% 103 100.00% 100.00% 31.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 54 52.43% 52.43% No. of Respondents 103 No 41 39.81% 39.81% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion 8 7.77% 7.77% % of Ballots 32.70% 103 100.00% 100.00% 31.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 82 79.61% 79.61% No. of Respondents 103 No 14 13.59% 13.59% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion 7 6.80% 6.80% % of Ballots 32.70% 103 100.00% 100.00% 31.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 68 66.02% 66.02% No. of Respondents 103 No 24 23.30% 23.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion 11 10.68% 10.68% % of Ballots 32.70% 103 100.00% 100.00% 31.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 57 55.34% 55.34% No. of Respondents 103 No 38 36.89% 36.89% Page 25 of 70

Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion 8 7.77% 7.77% % of Ballots 32.70% 103 100.00% 100.00% 31.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 25 24.27% 24.27% No. of Respondents 103 Good 30 29.13% 29.13% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HFair 22 21.36% 21.36% % of Ballots 32.70% Poor 26 25.24% 25.24% 103 100.00% 32: Berger- all 32.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 83 64.84% 64.84% No. of Respondents 128 No 41 32.03% 32.03% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion 4 3.13% 3.13% % of Ballots 40.63% 128 100.00% 100.00% 32.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 90 70.31% 70.31% No. of Respondents 128 No 35 27.34% 27.34% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion 3 2.34% 2.34% % of Ballots 40.63% 128 100.00% 100.00% 32.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 46.88% 46.88% No. of Respondents 128 No 56 43.75% 43.75% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion 12 9.38% 9.38% % of Ballots 40.63% 128 100.00% 100.00% 32.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 88 68.75% 68.75% No. of Respondents 128 No 30 23.44% 23.44% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion 10 7.81% 7.81% % of Ballots 40.63% 128 100.00% 100.00% 32.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 80 62.50% 62.50% No. of Respondents 128 No 38 29.69% 29.69% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion 10 7.81% 7.81% % of Ballots 40.63% 128 100.00% 100.00% Page 26 of 70

32.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 76 59.38% 59.38% No. of Respondents 128 No 44 34.38% 34.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion 8 6.25% 6.25% % of Ballots 40.63% 128 100.00% 100.00% 32.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 38 29.69% 29.69% No. of Respondents 128 Good 27 21.09% 21.09% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BFair 32 25.00% 25.00% % of Ballots 40.63% Poor 31 24.22% 24.22% 128 100.00% 33: Munford- all 33.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 86 88.66% 88.66% No. of Respondents 97 No 8 8.25% 8.25% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion 3 3.09% 3.09% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 33.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 85 87.63% 87.63% No. of Respondents 97 No 9 9.28% 9.28% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion 3 3.09% 3.09% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 33.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 82 84.54% 84.54% No. of Respondents 97 No 10 10.31% 10.31% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion 5 5.15% 5.15% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 33.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 87 89.69% 89.69% No. of Respondents 97 No 5 5.15% 5.15% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion 5 5.15% 5.15% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 33.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 83 85.57% 85.57% No. of Respondents 97 No 7 7.22% 7.22% Page 27 of 70

Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion 7 7.22% 7.22% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 33.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 84 86.60% 86.60% No. of Respondents 97 No 8 8.25% 8.25% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion 5 5.15% 5.15% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 33.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 60 61.86% 61.86% No. of Respondents 97 Good 26 26.80% 26.80% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MFair 4 4.12% 4.12% % of Ballots 30.79% Poor 7 7.22% 7.22% 97 100.00% 34: Hennigan - all 34.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 114 91.20% 91.20% No. of Respondents 125 No 9 7.20% 7.20% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion 2 1.60% 1.60% % of Ballots 39.68% 125 100.00% 100.00% 34.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 117 93.60% 93.60% No. of Respondents 125 No 4 3.20% 3.20% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion 4 3.20% 3.20% % of Ballots 39.68% 125 100.00% 100.00% 34.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 106 84.80% 84.80% No. of Respondents 125 No 13 10.40% 10.40% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion 6 4.80% 4.80% % of Ballots 39.68% 125 100.00% 100.00% 34.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 110 88.00% 88.00% No. of Respondents 125 No 6 4.80% 4.80% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion 9 7.20% 7.20% % of Ballots 39.68% 125 100.00% 100.00% Page 28 of 70

34.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 110 88.00% 88.00% No. of Respondents 125 No 7 5.60% 5.60% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion 8 6.40% 6.40% % of Ballots 39.68% 125 100.00% 100.00% 34.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 110 88.00% 88.00% No. of Respondents 125 No 11 8.80% 8.80% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion 4 3.20% 3.20% % of Ballots 39.68% 125 100.00% 100.00% 34.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 83 66.40% 66.40% No. of Respondents 125 Good 29 23.20% 23.20% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome Fair 8 6.40% 6.40% % of Ballots 39.68% Poor 5 4.00% 4.00% 125 100.00% 35: Poulos- all 35.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 73 75.26% 75.26% No. of Respondents 97 No 17 17.53% 17.53% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion 7 7.22% 7.22% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 35.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 62 63.92% 63.92% No. of Respondents 97 No 29 29.90% 29.90% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion 6 6.19% 6.19% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 35.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 56 57.73% 57.73% No. of Respondents 97 No 30 30.93% 30.93% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion 11 11.34% 11.34% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 35.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 78 80.41% 80.41% No. of Respondents 97 No 13 13.40% 13.40% Page 29 of 70

Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion 6 6.19% 6.19% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 35.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 71 73.20% 73.20% No. of Respondents 97 No 17 17.53% 17.53% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion 9 9.28% 9.28% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 35.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 61.86% 61.86% No. of Respondents 97 No 27 27.84% 27.84% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion 10 10.31% 10.31% % of Ballots 30.79% 97 100.00% 100.00% 35.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 32 32.99% 32.99% No. of Respondents 97 Good 29 29.90% 29.90% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth Po Fair 26 26.80% 26.80% % of Ballots 30.79% Poor 10 10.31% 10.31% 97 100.00% 36: Wells - all 36.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 108 88.52% 88.52% No. of Respondents 122 No 13 10.66% 10.66% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion 1 0.82% 0.82% % of Ballots 38.73% 122 100.00% 100.00% 36.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 101 82.79% 82.79% No. of Respondents 122 No 15 12.30% 12.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion 6 4.92% 4.92% % of Ballots 38.73% 122 100.00% 100.00% 36.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 101 82.79% 82.79% No. of Respondents 122 No 17 13.93% 13.93% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion 4 3.28% 3.28% % of Ballots 38.73% 122 100.00% 100.00% Page 30 of 70

36.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 108 88.52% 88.52% No. of Respondents 122 No 9 7.38% 7.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion 5 4.10% 4.10% % of Ballots 38.73% 122 100.00% 100.00% 36.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 104 85.25% 85.25% No. of Respondents 122 No 9 7.38% 7.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion 9 7.38% 7.38% % of Ballots 38.73% 122 100.00% 100.00% 36.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 93 76.23% 76.23% No. of Respondents 122 No 25 20.49% 20.49% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion 4 3.28% 3.28% % of Ballots 38.73% 122 100.00% 100.00% 36.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 71 58.20% 58.20% No. of Respondents 122 Good 29 23.77% 23.77% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WFair 10 8.20% 8.20% % of Ballots 38.73% Poor 12 9.84% 9.84% 122 100.00% 37: White - all 37.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 67 72.83% 72.83% No. of Respondents 92 No 16 17.39% 17.39% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion 9 9.78% 9.78% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 37.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 76 82.61% 82.61% No. of Respondents 92 No 10 10.87% 10.87% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion 6 6.52% 6.52% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 37.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 68 73.91% 73.91% No. of Respondents 92 No 13 14.13% 14.13% Page 31 of 70

Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion 11 11.96% 11.96% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 37.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 77 83.70% 83.70% No. of Respondents 92 No 8 8.70% 8.70% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion 7 7.61% 7.61% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 37.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 68 73.91% 73.91% No. of Respondents 92 No 13 14.13% 14.13% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion 11 11.96% 11.96% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 37.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 67 72.83% 72.83% No. of Respondents 92 No 15 16.30% 16.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion 10 10.87% 10.87% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 37.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 33 35.87% 35.87% No. of Respondents 92 Good 38 41.30% 41.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhFair 15 16.30% 16.30% % of Ballots 29.21% Poor 6 6.52% 6.52% 92 100.00% 38: Sinha all 38.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 109 93.97% 93.97% No. of Respondents 116 No 4 3.45% 3.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 3 2.59% 2.59% % of Ballots 36.83% 116 100.00% 100.00% 38.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 110 94.83% 94.83% No. of Respondents 116 No 4 3.45% 3.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 2 1.72% 1.72% % of Ballots 36.83% 116 100.00% 100.00% Page 32 of 70

38.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 94 81.03% 81.03% No. of Respondents 116 No 16 13.79% 13.79% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 6 5.17% 5.17% % of Ballots 36.83% 116 100.00% 100.00% 38.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 92 79.31% 79.31% No. of Respondents 116 No 17 14.66% 14.66% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 7 6.03% 6.03% % of Ballots 36.83% 116 100.00% 100.00% 38.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 88 75.86% 75.86% No. of Respondents 116 No 20 17.24% 17.24% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 8 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 36.83% 116 100.00% 100.00% 38.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 106 91.38% 91.38% No. of Respondents 116 No 7 6.03% 6.03% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 3 2.59% 2.59% % of Ballots 36.83% 116 100.00% 100.00% 38.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 68 58.62% 58.62% No. of Respondents 116 Good 35 30.17% 30.17% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael Fair 6 5.17% 5.17% % of Ballots 36.83% Poor 7 6.03% 6.03% 116 100.00% 39: Owen all 39.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 79 90.80% 90.80% No. of Respondents 87 No 3 3.45% 3.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion 5 5.75% 5.75% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 39.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 80 91.95% 91.95% No. of Respondents 87 No 3 3.45% 3.45% Page 33 of 70

Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion 4 4.60% 4.60% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 39.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 77 88.51% 88.51% No. of Respondents 87 No 7 8.05% 8.05% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion 3 3.45% 3.45% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 39.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 78 89.66% 89.66% No. of Respondents 87 No 4 4.60% 4.60% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion 5 5.75% 5.75% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 39.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 78 89.66% 89.66% No. of Respondents 87 No 4 4.60% 4.60% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion 5 5.75% 5.75% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 39.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 79 90.80% 90.80% No. of Respondents 87 No 5 5.75% 5.75% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion 3 3.45% 3.45% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 39.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 55 63.22% 63.22% No. of Respondents 87 Good 25 28.74% 28.74% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve OFair 3 3.45% 3.45% % of Ballots 27.62% Poor 4 4.60% 4.60% 87 100.00% 40: Bronson - all 40.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 82.19% 82.19% No. of Respondents 73 No 6 8.22% 8.22% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford No Opinion 7 9.59% 9.59% % of Ballots 23.17% 73 100.00% 100.00% Page 34 of 70

40.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 57 78.08% 78.08% No. of Respondents 73 No 7 9.59% 9.59% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford No Opinion 9 12.33% 12.33% % of Ballots 23.17% 73 100.00% 100.00% 40.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 56 76.71% 76.71% No. of Respondents 73 No 7 9.59% 9.59% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford No Opinion 10 13.70% 13.70% % of Ballots 23.17% 73 100.00% 100.00% 40.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 58 79.45% 79.45% No. of Respondents 73 No 6 8.22% 8.22% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford No Opinion 9 12.33% 12.33% % of Ballots 23.17% 73 100.00% 100.00% 40.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 80.82% 80.82% No. of Respondents 73 No 6 8.22% 8.22% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford No Opinion 8 10.96% 10.96% % of Ballots 23.17% 73 100.00% 100.00% 40.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 80.82% 80.82% No. of Respondents 73 No 5 6.85% 6.85% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford No Opinion 9 12.33% 12.33% % of Ballots 23.17% 73 100.00% 100.00% 40.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 36 49.32% 49.32% No. of Respondents 73 Good 29 39.73% 39.73% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Clifford Fair 4 5.48% 5.48% % of Ballots 23.17% Poor 4 5.48% 5.48% 73 100.00% 41: Boyd all 41.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 83 90.22% 90.22% No. of Respondents 92 No 8 8.70% 8.70% Page 35 of 70

Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoNo Opinion 1 1.09% 1.09% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 41.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 81 88.04% 88.04% No. of Respondents 92 No 8 8.70% 8.70% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoNo Opinion 3 3.26% 3.26% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 41.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 66 71.74% 71.74% No. of Respondents 92 No 17 18.48% 18.48% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoNo Opinion 9 9.78% 9.78% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 41.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 73 79.35% 79.35% No. of Respondents 92 No 11 11.96% 11.96% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoNo Opinion 8 8.70% 8.70% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 41.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 72 78.26% 78.26% No. of Respondents 92 No 12 13.04% 13.04% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoNo Opinion 8 8.70% 8.70% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 41.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 70 76.09% 76.09% No. of Respondents 92 No 15 16.30% 16.30% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoNo Opinion 7 7.61% 7.61% % of Ballots 29.21% 92 100.00% 100.00% 41.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 61 66.30% 66.30% No. of Respondents 92 Good 14 15.22% 15.22% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Jean BoFair 8 8.70% 8.70% % of Ballots 29.21% Poor 9 9.78% 9.78% 92 100.00% 42: Smith all Page 36 of 70

42.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 43 91.49% 91.49% No. of Respondents 47 No 3 6.38% 6.38% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmNo Opinion 1 2.13% 2.13% % of Ballots 14.92% 47 100.00% 100.00% 42.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 39 82.98% 82.98% No. of Respondents 47 No 4 8.51% 8.51% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmNo Opinion 4 8.51% 8.51% % of Ballots 14.92% 47 100.00% 100.00% 42.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 85.11% 85.11% No. of Respondents 47 No 4 8.51% 8.51% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmNo Opinion 3 6.38% 6.38% % of Ballots 14.92% 47 100.00% 100.00% 42.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 85.11% 85.11% No. of Respondents 47 No 4 8.51% 8.51% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmNo Opinion 3 6.38% 6.38% % of Ballots 14.92% 47 100.00% 100.00% 42.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 38 80.85% 80.85% No. of Respondents 47 No 5 10.64% 10.64% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmNo Opinion 4 8.51% 8.51% % of Ballots 14.92% 47 100.00% 100.00% 42.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 85.11% 85.11% No. of Respondents 47 No 5 10.64% 10.64% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmNo Opinion 2 4.26% 4.26% % of Ballots 14.92% 47 100.00% 100.00% 42.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 29 61.70% 61.70% No. of Respondents 47 Good 13 27.66% 27.66% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Ellen SmFair 2 4.26% 4.26% % of Ballots 14.92% Poor 3 6.38% 6.38% Page 37 of 70

47 100.00% 43: Menikos all 43.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 39 90.70% 90.70% No. of Respondents 43 No 4 9.30% 9.30% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenNo Opinion 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 13.65% 43 100.00% 100.00% 43.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 36 83.72% 83.72% No. of Respondents 43 No 6 13.95% 13.95% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenNo Opinion 1 2.33% 2.33% % of Ballots 13.65% 43 100.00% 100.00% 43.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 79.07% 79.07% No. of Respondents 43 No 7 16.28% 16.28% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenNo Opinion 2 4.65% 4.65% % of Ballots 13.65% 43 100.00% 100.00% 43.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 35 81.40% 81.40% No. of Respondents 43 No 6 13.95% 13.95% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenNo Opinion 2 4.65% 4.65% % of Ballots 13.65% 43 100.00% 100.00% 43.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 36 83.72% 83.72% No. of Respondents 43 No 5 11.63% 11.63% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenNo Opinion 2 4.65% 4.65% % of Ballots 13.65% 43 100.00% 100.00% 43.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 76.74% 76.74% No. of Respondents 43 No 7 16.28% 16.28% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenNo Opinion 3 6.98% 6.98% % of Ballots 13.65% 43 100.00% 100.00% 43.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 24 55.81% 55.81% Page 38 of 70

No. of Respondents 43 Good 12 27.91% 27.91% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Tim MenFair 4 9.30% 9.30% % of Ballots 13.65% Poor 3 6.98% 6.98% 43 100.00% 44: Brown all 44.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 82.22% 82.22% No. of Respondents 45 No 6 13.33% 13.33% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroNo Opinion 2 4.44% 4.44% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 44.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 39 86.67% 86.67% No. of Respondents 45 No 5 11.11% 11.11% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroNo Opinion 1 2.22% 2.22% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 44.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 75.56% 75.56% No. of Respondents 45 No 7 15.56% 15.56% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroNo Opinion 4 8.89% 8.89% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 44.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 38 84.44% 84.44% No. of Respondents 45 No 6 13.33% 13.33% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroNo Opinion 1 2.22% 2.22% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 44.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 36 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 45 No 8 17.78% 17.78% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroNo Opinion 1 2.22% 2.22% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 44.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 35 77.78% 77.78% No. of Respondents 45 No 7 15.56% 15.56% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroNo Opinion 3 6.67% 6.67% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% Page 39 of 70

44.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 22 48.89% 48.89% No. of Respondents 45 Good 12 26.67% 26.67% Condition: Q5 has 'Hon. Kim BroFair 5 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 14.29% Poor 6 13.33% 13.33% 45 100.00% 45: Wilson all 45.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 44 57.14% 57.14% No. of Respondents 77 No 29 37.66% 37.66% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen No Opinion 4 5.19% 5.19% % of Ballots 24.44% 77 100.00% 100.00% 45.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 29 37.66% 37.66% No. of Respondents 77 No 45 58.44% 58.44% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen No Opinion 3 3.90% 3.90% % of Ballots 24.44% 77 100.00% 100.00% 45.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 49 63.64% 63.64% No. of Respondents 77 No 21 27.27% 27.27% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen No Opinion 7 9.09% 9.09% % of Ballots 24.44% 77 100.00% 100.00% 45.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 63 81.82% 81.82% No. of Respondents 77 No 11 14.29% 14.29% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen No Opinion 3 3.90% 3.90% % of Ballots 24.44% 77 100.00% 100.00% 45.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 54 70.13% 70.13% No. of Respondents 77 No 18 23.38% 23.38% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen No Opinion 5 6.49% 6.49% % of Ballots 24.44% 77 100.00% 100.00% 45.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 44.16% 44.16% Page 40 of 70

No. of Respondents 77 No 35 45.45% 45.45% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen No Opinion 8 10.39% 10.39% % of Ballots 24.44% 77 100.00% 100.00% 45.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 25 32.47% 32.47% No. of Respondents 77 Good 13 16.88% 16.88% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Sharen Fair 15 19.48% 19.48% % of Ballots 24.44% Poor 24 31.17% 31.17% 77 100.00% 46: Salvant all 46.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 50 73.53% 73.53% No. of Respondents 68 No 16 23.53% 23.53% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne No Opinion 2 2.94% 2.94% % of Ballots 21.59% 68 100.00% 100.00% 46.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 46 67.65% 67.65% No. of Respondents 68 No 19 27.94% 27.94% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne No Opinion 3 4.41% 4.41% % of Ballots 21.59% 68 100.00% 100.00% 46.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 36 52.94% 52.94% No. of Respondents 68 No 26 38.24% 38.24% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne No Opinion 6 8.82% 8.82% % of Ballots 21.59% 68 100.00% 100.00% 46.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 45 66.18% 66.18% No. of Respondents 68 No 17 25.00% 25.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne No Opinion 6 8.82% 8.82% % of Ballots 21.59% 68 100.00% 100.00% 46.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 43 63.24% 63.24% No. of Respondents 68 No 21 30.88% 30.88% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne No Opinion 4 5.88% 5.88% % of Ballots 21.59% 68 100.00% 100.00% Page 41 of 70

46.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 41 60.29% 60.29% No. of Respondents 68 No 22 32.35% 32.35% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne No Opinion 5 7.35% 7.35% % of Ballots 21.59% 68 100.00% 100.00% 46.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 21 30.88% 30.88% No. of Respondents 68 Good 25 36.76% 36.76% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Wayne Fair 9 13.24% 13.24% % of Ballots 21.59% Poor 13 19.12% 19.12% 68 100.00% 47: Thomas all 47.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 53 86.89% 86.89% No. of Respondents 61 No 8 13.11% 13.11% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 19.37% 61 100.00% 100.00% 47.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 44 72.13% 72.13% No. of Respondents 61 No 14 22.95% 22.95% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 3 4.92% 4.92% % of Ballots 19.37% 61 100.00% 100.00% 47.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 47 77.05% 77.05% No. of Respondents 61 No 10 16.39% 16.39% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 4 6.56% 6.56% % of Ballots 19.37% 61 100.00% 100.00% 47.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 50 81.97% 81.97% No. of Respondents 61 No 8 13.11% 13.11% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 3 4.92% 4.92% % of Ballots 19.37% 61 100.00% 100.00% 47.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 44 72.13% 72.13% Page 42 of 70

No. of Respondents 61 No 13 21.31% 21.31% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 4 6.56% 6.56% % of Ballots 19.37% 61 100.00% 100.00% 47.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 47 77.05% 77.05% No. of Respondents 61 No 10 16.39% 16.39% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 4 6.56% 6.56% % of Ballots 19.37% 61 100.00% 100.00% 47.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 27 44.26% 44.26% No. of Respondents 61 Good 20 32.79% 32.79% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Michael Fair 6 9.84% 9.84% % of Ballots 19.37% Poor 8 13.11% 13.11% 61 100.00% 48: Sterns - all 48.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 66 92.96% 92.96% No. of Respondents 71 No 4 5.63% 5.63% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StNo Opinion 1 1.41% 1.41% % of Ballots 22.54% 71 100.00% 100.00% 48.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 66 92.96% 92.96% No. of Respondents 71 No 4 5.63% 5.63% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StNo Opinion 1 1.41% 1.41% % of Ballots 22.54% 71 100.00% 100.00% 48.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 64 90.14% 90.14% No. of Respondents 71 No 4 5.63% 5.63% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StNo Opinion 3 4.23% 4.23% % of Ballots 22.54% 71 100.00% 100.00% 48.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 61 85.92% 85.92% No. of Respondents 71 No 7 9.86% 9.86% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StNo Opinion 3 4.23% 4.23% % of Ballots 22.54% 71 100.00% 100.00% Page 43 of 70

48.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 83.10% 83.10% No. of Respondents 71 No 5 7.04% 7.04% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StNo Opinion 7 9.86% 9.86% % of Ballots 22.54% 71 100.00% 100.00% 48.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 67 94.37% 94.37% No. of Respondents 71 No 3 4.23% 4.23% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StNo Opinion 1 1.41% 1.41% % of Ballots 22.54% 71 100.00% 100.00% 48.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 54 76.06% 76.06% No. of Respondents 71 Good 12 16.90% 16.90% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Louis StFair 2 2.82% 2.82% % of Ballots 22.54% Poor 3 4.23% 4.23% 71 100.00% 49: Young all 49.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 85.71% 85.71% No. of Respondents 70 No 8 11.43% 11.43% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett No Opinion 2 2.86% 2.86% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 49.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 85.71% 85.71% No. of Respondents 70 No 7 10.00% 10.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett No Opinion 3 4.29% 4.29% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 49.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 50 71.43% 71.43% No. of Respondents 70 No 16 22.86% 22.86% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett No Opinion 4 5.71% 5.71% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 49.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 48 68.57% 68.57% Page 44 of 70

No. of Respondents 70 No 17 24.29% 24.29% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett No Opinion 5 7.14% 7.14% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 49.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 42 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 70 No 22 31.43% 31.43% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett No Opinion 6 8.57% 8.57% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 49.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 52 74.29% 74.29% No. of Respondents 70 No 15 21.43% 21.43% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett No Opinion 3 4.29% 4.29% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 49.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 34 48.57% 48.57% No. of Respondents 70 Good 18 25.71% 25.71% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Everett Fair 10 14.29% 14.29% % of Ballots 22.22% Poor 8 11.43% 11.43% 70 100.00% 50: Westfall - all 50.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 74.00% 74.00% No. of Respondents 50 No 9 18.00% 18.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WNo Opinion 4 8.00% 8.00% % of Ballots 15.87% 50 100.00% 100.00% 50.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 74.00% 74.00% No. of Respondents 50 No 9 18.00% 18.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WNo Opinion 4 8.00% 8.00% % of Ballots 15.87% 50 100.00% 100.00% 50.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 66.00% 66.00% No. of Respondents 50 No 11 22.00% 22.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WNo Opinion 6 12.00% 12.00% % of Ballots 15.87% 50 100.00% 100.00% Page 45 of 70

50.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 39 78.00% 78.00% No. of Respondents 50 No 6 12.00% 12.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WNo Opinion 5 10.00% 10.00% % of Ballots 15.87% 50 100.00% 100.00% 50.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 68.00% 68.00% No. of Respondents 50 No 10 20.00% 20.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WNo Opinion 6 12.00% 12.00% % of Ballots 15.87% 50 100.00% 100.00% 50.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 31 62.00% 62.00% No. of Respondents 50 No 15 30.00% 30.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WNo Opinion 4 8.00% 8.00% % of Ballots 15.87% 50 100.00% 100.00% 50.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 19 38.00% 38.00% No. of Respondents 50 Good 16 32.00% 32.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Molly WFair 7 14.00% 14.00% % of Ballots 15.87% Poor 8 16.00% 16.00% 50 100.00% 51: Wisch all 51.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 56 88.89% 88.89% No. of Respondents 63 No 6 9.52% 9.52% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WNo Opinion 1 1.59% 1.59% % of Ballots 20.00% 63 100.00% 100.00% 51.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 52 82.54% 82.54% No. of Respondents 63 No 10 15.87% 15.87% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WNo Opinion 1 1.59% 1.59% % of Ballots 20.00% 63 100.00% 100.00% 51.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 52 82.54% 82.54% Page 46 of 70

No. of Respondents 63 No 8 12.70% 12.70% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WNo Opinion 3 4.76% 4.76% % of Ballots 20.00% 63 100.00% 100.00% 51.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 41 65.08% 65.08% No. of Respondents 63 No 16 25.40% 25.40% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WNo Opinion 6 9.52% 9.52% % of Ballots 20.00% 63 100.00% 100.00% 51.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 30 47.62% 47.62% No. of Respondents 63 No 26 41.27% 41.27% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WNo Opinion 7 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 20.00% 63 100.00% 100.00% 51.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 51 80.95% 80.95% No. of Respondents 63 No 9 14.29% 14.29% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WNo Opinion 3 4.76% 4.76% % of Ballots 20.00% 63 100.00% 100.00% 51.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 34 53.97% 53.97% No. of Respondents 63 Good 19 30.16% 30.16% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Scott WFair 4 6.35% 6.35% % of Ballots 20.00% Poor 6 9.52% 9.52% 63 100.00% 52: Gallagher all 52.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 86.96% 86.96% No. of Respondents 69 No 8 11.59% 11.59% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George No Opinion 1 1.45% 1.45% % of Ballots 21.90% 69 100.00% 100.00% 52.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 58 84.06% 84.06% No. of Respondents 69 No 9 13.04% 13.04% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George No Opinion 2 2.90% 2.90% % of Ballots 21.90% 69 100.00% 100.00% Page 47 of 70

52.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 56 81.16% 81.16% No. of Respondents 69 No 10 14.49% 14.49% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George No Opinion 3 4.35% 4.35% % of Ballots 21.90% 69 100.00% 100.00% 52.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 58 84.06% 84.06% No. of Respondents 69 No 7 10.14% 10.14% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George No Opinion 4 5.80% 5.80% % of Ballots 21.90% 69 100.00% 100.00% 52.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 55 79.71% 79.71% No. of Respondents 69 No 10 14.49% 14.49% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George No Opinion 4 5.80% 5.80% % of Ballots 21.90% 69 100.00% 100.00% 52.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 56 81.16% 81.16% No. of Respondents 69 No 10 14.49% 14.49% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George No Opinion 3 4.35% 4.35% % of Ballots 21.90% 69 100.00% 100.00% 52.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 45 65.22% 65.22% No. of Respondents 69 Good 15 21.74% 21.74% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. George Fair 4 5.80% 5.80% % of Ballots 21.90% Poor 5 7.25% 7.25% 69 100.00% 53: Gonzalez - all 53.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 47 81.03% 81.03% No. of Respondents 58 No 7 12.07% 12.07% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GNo Opinion 4 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 53.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 43 74.14% 74.14% Page 48 of 70

No. of Respondents 58 No 10 17.24% 17.24% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GNo Opinion 5 8.62% 8.62% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 53.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 35 60.34% 60.34% No. of Respondents 58 No 12 20.69% 20.69% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GNo Opinion 11 18.97% 18.97% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 53.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 63.79% 63.79% No. of Respondents 58 No 10 17.24% 17.24% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GNo Opinion 11 18.97% 18.97% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 53.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 58.62% 58.62% No. of Respondents 58 No 12 20.69% 20.69% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GNo Opinion 12 20.69% 20.69% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 53.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 39 67.24% 67.24% No. of Respondents 58 No 9 15.52% 15.52% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GNo Opinion 10 17.24% 17.24% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 53.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 19 32.76% 32.76% No. of Respondents 58 Good 23 39.66% 39.66% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Ruben GFair 11 18.97% 18.97% % of Ballots 18.41% Poor 5 8.62% 8.62% 58 100.00% 54: Grant all 54.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 23 57.50% 57.50% No. of Respondents 40 No 9 22.50% 22.50% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrNo Opinion 8 20.00% 20.00% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% Page 49 of 70

54.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 26 65.00% 65.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 9 22.50% 22.50% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrNo Opinion 5 12.50% 12.50% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 54.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 24 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 7 17.50% 17.50% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrNo Opinion 9 22.50% 22.50% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 54.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 32 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 2 5.00% 5.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrNo Opinion 6 15.00% 15.00% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 54.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 70.00% 70.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 3 7.50% 7.50% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrNo Opinion 9 22.50% 22.50% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 54.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 26 65.00% 65.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 8 20.00% 20.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrNo Opinion 6 15.00% 15.00% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 54.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 13 32.50% 32.50% No. of Respondents 40 Good 15 37.50% 37.50% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Gene GrFair 7 17.50% 17.50% % of Ballots 12.70% Poor 5 12.50% 12.50% 40 100.00% 55: Minnick all 55.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 71.79% 71.79% Page 50 of 70

No. of Respondents 39 No 6 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennNo Opinion 5 12.82% 12.82% % of Ballots 12.38% 39 100.00% 100.00% 55.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 30 76.92% 76.92% No. of Respondents 39 No 6 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennNo Opinion 3 7.69% 7.69% % of Ballots 12.38% 39 100.00% 100.00% 55.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 26 66.67% 66.67% No. of Respondents 39 No 7 17.95% 17.95% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennNo Opinion 6 15.38% 15.38% % of Ballots 12.38% 39 100.00% 100.00% 55.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 30 76.92% 76.92% No. of Respondents 39 No 6 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennNo Opinion 3 7.69% 7.69% % of Ballots 12.38% 39 100.00% 100.00% 55.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 27 69.23% 69.23% No. of Respondents 39 No 6 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennNo Opinion 6 15.38% 15.38% % of Ballots 12.38% 39 100.00% 100.00% 55.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 27 69.23% 69.23% No. of Respondents 39 No 8 20.51% 20.51% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennNo Opinion 4 10.26% 10.26% % of Ballots 12.38% 39 100.00% 100.00% 55.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 21 53.85% 53.85% No. of Respondents 39 Good 10 25.64% 25.64% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. CheyennFair 3 7.69% 7.69% % of Ballots 12.38% Poor 5 12.82% 12.82% 39 100.00% Page 51 of 70

56: White all 56.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 35 No 3 8.57% 8.57% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie No Opinion 4 11.43% 11.43% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 56.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 27 77.14% 77.14% No. of Respondents 35 No 3 8.57% 8.57% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie No Opinion 5 14.29% 14.29% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 56.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 24 68.57% 68.57% No. of Respondents 35 No 4 11.43% 11.43% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie No Opinion 7 20.00% 20.00% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 56.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 35 No 2 5.71% 5.71% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie No Opinion 5 14.29% 14.29% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 56.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 25 71.43% 71.43% No. of Respondents 35 No 3 8.57% 8.57% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie No Opinion 7 20.00% 20.00% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 56.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 27 77.14% 77.14% No. of Respondents 35 No 3 8.57% 8.57% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie No Opinion 5 14.29% 14.29% % of Ballots 11.11% 35 100.00% 100.00% 56.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 21 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 35 Good 9 25.71% 25.71% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Timmie Fair 3 8.57% 8.57% Page 52 of 70

% of Ballots 11.11% Poor 2 5.71% 5.71% 35 100.00% 57: King all 57.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 23 71.88% 71.88% No. of Respondents 32 No 7 21.88% 21.88% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinNo Opinion 2 6.25% 6.25% % of Ballots 10.16% 32 100.00% 100.00% 57.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 20 62.50% 62.50% No. of Respondents 32 No 11 34.38% 34.38% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinNo Opinion 1 3.13% 3.13% % of Ballots 10.16% 32 100.00% 100.00% 57.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 19 59.38% 59.38% No. of Respondents 32 No 10 31.25% 31.25% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinNo Opinion 3 9.38% 9.38% % of Ballots 10.16% 32 100.00% 100.00% 57.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 23 71.88% 71.88% No. of Respondents 32 No 6 18.75% 18.75% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinNo Opinion 3 9.38% 9.38% % of Ballots 10.16% 32 100.00% 100.00% 57.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 22 68.75% 68.75% No. of Respondents 32 No 7 21.88% 21.88% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinNo Opinion 3 9.38% 9.38% % of Ballots 10.16% 32 100.00% 100.00% 57.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 21 65.63% 65.63% No. of Respondents 32 No 8 25.00% 25.00% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinNo Opinion 3 9.38% 9.38% % of Ballots 10.16% 32 100.00% 100.00% 57.7: overall Page 53 of 70

Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 15 46.88% 46.88% No. of Respondents 32 Good 5 15.63% 15.63% Condition: Q6 has 'Hon. Matt KinFair 8 25.00% 25.00% % of Ballots 10.16% Poor 4 12.50% 12.50% 32 100.00% 58: Rymell all 58.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 126 86.90% 86.90% No. of Respondents 145 No 12 8.28% 8.28% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferNo Opinion 7 4.83% 4.83% % of Ballots 46.03% 145 100.00% 100.00% 58.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 128 88.28% 88.28% No. of Respondents 145 No 13 8.97% 8.97% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferNo Opinion 4 2.76% 2.76% % of Ballots 46.03% 145 100.00% 100.00% 58.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 113 77.93% 77.93% No. of Respondents 145 No 20 13.79% 13.79% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferNo Opinion 12 8.28% 8.28% % of Ballots 46.03% 145 100.00% 100.00% 58.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 122 84.14% 84.14% No. of Respondents 145 No 12 8.28% 8.28% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferNo Opinion 11 7.59% 7.59% % of Ballots 46.03% 145 100.00% 100.00% 58.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 119 82.07% 82.07% No. of Respondents 145 No 16 11.03% 11.03% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferNo Opinion 10 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 46.03% 145 100.00% 100.00% 58.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 127 87.59% 87.59% No. of Respondents 145 No 13 8.97% 8.97% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferNo Opinion 5 3.45% 3.45% Page 54 of 70

% of Ballots 46.03% 145 100.00% 100.00% 58.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 78 53.79% 53.79% No. of Respondents 145 Good 40 27.59% 27.59% Condition: Q7 has 'Hon. JenniferFair 20 13.79% 13.79% % of Ballots 46.03% Poor 7 4.83% 4.83% 145 100.00% 59: Hill all 59.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 55 No 14 25.45% 25.45% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HNo Opinion 8 14.55% 14.55% % of Ballots 17.46% 55 100.00% 100.00% 59.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 36 65.45% 65.45% No. of Respondents 55 No 14 25.45% 25.45% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HNo Opinion 5 9.09% 9.09% % of Ballots 17.46% 55 100.00% 100.00% 59.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 55 No 17 30.91% 30.91% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HNo Opinion 5 9.09% 9.09% % of Ballots 17.46% 55 100.00% 100.00% 59.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 35 63.64% 63.64% No. of Respondents 55 No 15 27.27% 27.27% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HNo Opinion 5 9.09% 9.09% % of Ballots 17.46% 55 100.00% 100.00% 59.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 31 56.36% 56.36% No. of Respondents 55 No 19 34.55% 34.55% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HNo Opinion 5 9.09% 9.09% % of Ballots 17.46% 55 100.00% 100.00% 59.6: impartial Page 55 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 34 61.82% 61.82% No. of Respondents 55 No 17 30.91% 30.91% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HNo Opinion 4 7.27% 7.27% % of Ballots 17.46% 55 100.00% 100.00% 59.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 19 34.55% 34.55% No. of Respondents 55 Good 14 25.45% 25.45% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Sherry HFair 8 14.55% 14.55% % of Ballots 17.46% Poor 14 25.45% 25.45% 55 100.00% 60: Mitchell all 60.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 50 86.21% 86.21% No. of Respondents 58 No 5 8.62% 8.62% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 3 5.17% 5.17% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 60.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 49 84.48% 84.48% No. of Respondents 58 No 7 12.07% 12.07% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 2 3.45% 3.45% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 60.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 49 84.48% 84.48% No. of Respondents 58 No 5 8.62% 8.62% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 4 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 60.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 51 87.93% 87.93% No. of Respondents 58 No 3 5.17% 5.17% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 4 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 60.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 47 81.03% 81.03% No. of Respondents 58 No 5 8.62% 8.62% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 6 10.34% 10.34% Page 56 of 70

% of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 60.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 47 81.03% 81.03% No. of Respondents 58 No 8 13.79% 13.79% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion 3 5.17% 5.17% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 60.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 36 62.07% 62.07% No. of Respondents 58 Good 13 22.41% 22.41% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Michael Fair 4 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 18.41% Poor 5 8.62% 8.62% 58 100.00% 61: Mills all 61.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 93.75% 93.75% No. of Respondents 64 No 3 4.69% 4.69% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil No Opinion 1 1.56% 1.56% % of Ballots 20.32% 64 100.00% 100.00% 61.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 93.75% 93.75% No. of Respondents 64 No 3 4.69% 4.69% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil No Opinion 1 1.56% 1.56% % of Ballots 20.32% 64 100.00% 100.00% 61.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 92.19% 92.19% No. of Respondents 64 No 4 6.25% 6.25% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil No Opinion 1 1.56% 1.56% % of Ballots 20.32% 64 100.00% 100.00% 61.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 92.19% 92.19% No. of Respondents 64 No 4 6.25% 6.25% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil No Opinion 1 1.56% 1.56% % of Ballots 20.32% 64 100.00% 100.00% 61.5: efficient Page 57 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 57 89.06% 89.06% No. of Respondents 64 No 5 7.81% 7.81% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil No Opinion 2 3.13% 3.13% % of Ballots 20.32% 64 100.00% 100.00% 61.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 60 93.75% 93.75% No. of Respondents 64 No 3 4.69% 4.69% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil No Opinion 1 1.56% 1.56% % of Ballots 20.32% 64 100.00% 100.00% 61.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 58 90.63% 90.63% No. of Respondents 64 Good 3 4.69% 4.69% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Billy Mil Fair 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 20.32% Poor 3 4.69% 4.69% 64 100.00% 62: Nekhom all 62.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 22 47.83% 47.83% No. of Respondents 46 No 19 41.30% 41.30% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahNo Opinion 5 10.87% 10.87% % of Ballots 14.60% 46 100.00% 100.00% 62.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 21 45.65% 45.65% No. of Respondents 46 No 21 45.65% 45.65% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahNo Opinion 4 8.70% 8.70% % of Ballots 14.60% 46 100.00% 100.00% 62.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 19 41.30% 41.30% No. of Respondents 46 No 20 43.48% 43.48% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahNo Opinion 7 15.22% 15.22% % of Ballots 14.60% 46 100.00% 100.00% 62.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 25 54.35% 54.35% No. of Respondents 46 No 15 32.61% 32.61% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahNo Opinion 6 13.04% 13.04% Page 58 of 70

% of Ballots 14.60% 46 100.00% 100.00% 62.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 20 43.48% 43.48% No. of Respondents 46 No 19 41.30% 41.30% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahNo Opinion 7 15.22% 15.22% % of Ballots 14.60% 46 100.00% 100.00% 62.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 22 47.83% 47.83% No. of Respondents 46 No 17 36.96% 36.96% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahNo Opinion 7 15.22% 15.22% % of Ballots 14.60% 46 100.00% 100.00% 62.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 11 23.91% 23.91% No. of Respondents 46 Good 9 19.57% 19.57% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. DeborahFair 12 26.09% 26.09% % of Ballots 14.60% Poor 14 30.43% 30.43% 46 100.00% 63: Cummings all 63.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 41 91.11% 91.11% No. of Respondents 45 No 3 6.67% 6.67% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CNo Opinion 1 2.22% 2.22% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 63.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 88.89% 88.89% No. of Respondents 45 No 4 8.89% 8.89% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CNo Opinion 1 2.22% 2.22% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 63.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 82.22% 82.22% No. of Respondents 45 No 6 13.33% 13.33% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CNo Opinion 2 4.44% 4.44% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 63.4: timeliness Page 59 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 41 91.11% 91.11% No. of Respondents 45 No 3 6.67% 6.67% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CNo Opinion 1 2.22% 2.22% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 63.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 36 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 45 No 7 15.56% 15.56% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CNo Opinion 2 4.44% 4.44% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 63.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 38 84.44% 84.44% No. of Respondents 45 No 2 4.44% 4.44% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CNo Opinion 5 11.11% 11.11% % of Ballots 14.29% 45 100.00% 100.00% 63.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 27 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 45 Good 11 24.44% 24.44% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Jamie CFair 4 8.89% 8.89% % of Ballots 14.29% Poor 3 6.67% 6.67% 45 100.00% 64: Jones all 64.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 32 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 5 12.50% 12.50% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoNo Opinion 3 7.50% 7.50% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 64.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 82.50% 82.50% No. of Respondents 40 No 5 12.50% 12.50% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoNo Opinion 2 5.00% 5.00% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 64.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 32 80.00% 80.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 5 12.50% 12.50% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoNo Opinion 3 7.50% 7.50% Page 60 of 70

% of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 64.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 30 75.00% 75.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 7 17.50% 17.50% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoNo Opinion 3 7.50% 7.50% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 64.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 70.00% 70.00% No. of Respondents 40 No 9 22.50% 22.50% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoNo Opinion 3 7.50% 7.50% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 64.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 82.50% 82.50% No. of Respondents 40 No 5 12.50% 12.50% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoNo Opinion 2 5.00% 5.00% % of Ballots 12.70% 40 100.00% 100.00% 64.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 23 57.50% 57.50% No. of Respondents 40 Good 8 20.00% 20.00% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Molly JoFair 5 12.50% 12.50% % of Ballots 12.70% Poor 4 10.00% 10.00% 40 100.00% 65: Hardy all 65.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 42 72.41% 72.41% No. of Respondents 58 No 13 22.41% 22.41% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HNo Opinion 3 5.17% 5.17% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 65.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 44 75.86% 75.86% No. of Respondents 58 No 10 17.24% 17.24% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HNo Opinion 4 6.90% 6.90% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 65.3: apply Page 61 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 33 56.90% 56.90% No. of Respondents 58 No 19 32.76% 32.76% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HNo Opinion 6 10.34% 10.34% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 65.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 38 65.52% 65.52% No. of Respondents 58 No 14 24.14% 24.14% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HNo Opinion 6 10.34% 10.34% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 65.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 37 63.79% 63.79% No. of Respondents 58 No 15 25.86% 25.86% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HNo Opinion 6 10.34% 10.34% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 65.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 41 70.69% 70.69% No. of Respondents 58 No 10 17.24% 17.24% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HNo Opinion 7 12.07% 12.07% % of Ballots 18.41% 58 100.00% 100.00% 65.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 22 37.93% 37.93% No. of Respondents 58 Good 17 29.31% 29.31% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Cheril HFair 10 17.24% 17.24% % of Ballots 18.41% Poor 9 15.52% 15.52% 58 100.00% 66: Coffey all 66.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 43 82.69% 82.69% No. of Respondents 52 No 6 11.54% 11.54% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoNo Opinion 3 5.77% 5.77% % of Ballots 16.51% 52 100.00% 100.00% 66.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 43 82.69% 82.69% No. of Respondents 52 No 8 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoNo Opinion 1 1.92% 1.92% Page 62 of 70

% of Ballots 16.51% 52 100.00% 100.00% 66.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 76.92% 76.92% No. of Respondents 52 No 9 17.31% 17.31% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoNo Opinion 3 5.77% 5.77% % of Ballots 16.51% 52 100.00% 100.00% 66.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 76.92% 76.92% No. of Respondents 52 No 8 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoNo Opinion 4 7.69% 7.69% % of Ballots 16.51% 52 100.00% 100.00% 66.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 35 67.31% 67.31% No. of Respondents 52 No 12 23.08% 23.08% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoNo Opinion 5 9.62% 9.62% % of Ballots 16.51% 52 100.00% 100.00% 66.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 40 76.92% 76.92% No. of Respondents 52 No 8 15.38% 15.38% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoNo Opinion 4 7.69% 7.69% % of Ballots 16.51% 52 100.00% 100.00% 66.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 27 51.92% 51.92% No. of Respondents 52 Good 11 21.15% 21.15% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Daryl CoFair 7 13.46% 13.46% % of Ballots 16.51% Poor 7 13.46% 13.46% 52 100.00% 67: Carr all 67.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 54 91.53% 91.53% No. of Respondents 59 No 5 8.47% 8.47% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaNo Opinion 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 18.73% 59 100.00% 100.00% 67.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Page 63 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 54 91.53% 91.53% No. of Respondents 59 No 5 8.47% 8.47% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaNo Opinion 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 18.73% 59 100.00% 100.00% 67.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 51 86.44% 86.44% No. of Respondents 59 No 7 11.86% 11.86% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaNo Opinion 1 1.69% 1.69% % of Ballots 18.73% 59 100.00% 100.00% 67.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 51 86.44% 86.44% No. of Respondents 59 No 7 11.86% 11.86% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaNo Opinion 1 1.69% 1.69% % of Ballots 18.73% 59 100.00% 100.00% 67.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 51 86.44% 86.44% No. of Respondents 59 No 6 10.17% 10.17% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaNo Opinion 2 3.39% 3.39% % of Ballots 18.73% 59 100.00% 100.00% 67.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 50 84.75% 84.75% No. of Respondents 59 No 9 15.25% 15.25% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaNo Opinion 0 0.00% 0.00% % of Ballots 18.73% 59 100.00% 100.00% 67.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 42 71.19% 71.19% No. of Respondents 59 Good 12 20.34% 20.34% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Brent CaFair 1 1.69% 1.69% % of Ballots 18.73% Poor 4 6.78% 6.78% 59 100.00% 68: Sorrells all 68.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 57.14% 57.14% No. of Respondents 49 No 15 30.61% 30.61% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor No Opinion 6 12.24% 12.24% Page 64 of 70

% of Ballots 15.56% 49 100.00% 100.00% 68.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 23 46.94% 46.94% No. of Respondents 49 No 23 46.94% 46.94% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor No Opinion 3 6.12% 6.12% % of Ballots 15.56% 49 100.00% 100.00% 68.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 24 48.98% 48.98% No. of Respondents 49 No 20 40.82% 40.82% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor No Opinion 5 10.20% 10.20% % of Ballots 15.56% 49 100.00% 100.00% 68.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 31 63.27% 63.27% No. of Respondents 49 No 13 26.53% 26.53% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor No Opinion 5 10.20% 10.20% % of Ballots 15.56% 49 100.00% 100.00% 68.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 28 57.14% 57.14% No. of Respondents 49 No 20 40.82% 40.82% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor No Opinion 1 2.04% 2.04% % of Ballots 15.56% 49 100.00% 100.00% 68.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 22 44.90% 44.90% No. of Respondents 49 No 23 46.94% 46.94% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor No Opinion 4 8.16% 8.16% % of Ballots 15.56% 49 100.00% 100.00% 68.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 10 20.41% 20.41% No. of Respondents 49 Good 13 26.53% 26.53% Condition: Q8 has 'Hon. Phil Sor Fair 10 20.41% 20.41% % of Ballots 15.56% Poor 16 32.65% 32.65% 49 100.00% 69: King all 69.1: integrity Page 65 of 70

Question Type SINGLE Yes 123 83.67% 83.67% No. of Respondents 147 No 18 12.24% 12.24% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K No Opinion 6 4.08% 4.08% % of Ballots 46.67% 147 100.00% 100.00% 69.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 89 60.54% 60.54% No. of Respondents 147 No 51 34.69% 34.69% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K No Opinion 7 4.76% 4.76% % of Ballots 46.67% 147 100.00% 100.00% 69.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 116 78.91% 78.91% No. of Respondents 147 No 22 14.97% 14.97% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K No Opinion 9 6.12% 6.12% % of Ballots 46.67% 147 100.00% 100.00% 69.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 110 74.83% 74.83% No. of Respondents 147 No 31 21.09% 21.09% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K No Opinion 6 4.08% 4.08% % of Ballots 46.67% 147 100.00% 100.00% 69.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 102 69.39% 69.39% No. of Respondents 147 No 36 24.49% 24.49% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K No Opinion 9 6.12% 6.12% % of Ballots 46.67% 147 100.00% 100.00% 69.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 102 69.39% 69.39% No. of Respondents 147 No 36 24.49% 24.49% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K No Opinion 9 6.12% 6.12% % of Ballots 46.67% 147 100.00% 100.00% 69.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 57 38.78% 38.78% No. of Respondents 147 Good 41 27.89% 27.89% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Steve K Fair 27 18.37% 18.37% % of Ballots 46.67% Poor 22 14.97% 14.97% 147 100.00% Page 66 of 70

70: McGown all 70.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 62 88.57% 88.57% No. of Respondents 70 No 3 4.29% 4.29% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinNo Opinion 5 7.14% 7.14% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 70.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 63 90.00% 90.00% No. of Respondents 70 No 3 4.29% 4.29% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinNo Opinion 4 5.71% 5.71% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 70.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 54 77.14% 77.14% No. of Respondents 70 No 4 5.71% 5.71% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinNo Opinion 12 17.14% 17.14% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 70.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 53 75.71% 75.71% No. of Respondents 70 No 3 4.29% 4.29% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinNo Opinion 14 20.00% 20.00% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 70.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 59 84.29% 84.29% No. of Respondents 70 No 3 4.29% 4.29% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinNo Opinion 8 11.43% 11.43% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 70.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 61 87.14% 87.14% No. of Respondents 70 No 4 5.71% 5.71% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinNo Opinion 5 7.14% 7.14% % of Ballots 22.22% 70 100.00% 100.00% 70.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 42 60.00% 60.00% No. of Respondents 70 Good 23 32.86% 32.86% Page 67 of 70

Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. QuentinFair 2 2.86% 2.86% % of Ballots 22.22% Poor 3 4.29% 4.29% 70 100.00% 71: Ferchill all 71.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 142 89.87% 89.87% No. of Respondents 158 No 12 7.59% 7.59% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FNo Opinion 4 2.53% 2.53% % of Ballots 50.16% 158 100.00% 100.00% 71.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 142 89.87% 89.87% No. of Respondents 158 No 15 9.49% 9.49% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FNo Opinion 1 0.63% 0.63% % of Ballots 50.16% 158 100.00% 100.00% 71.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 135 85.44% 85.44% No. of Respondents 158 No 18 11.39% 11.39% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FNo Opinion 5 3.16% 3.16% % of Ballots 50.16% 158 100.00% 100.00% 71.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 141 89.24% 89.24% No. of Respondents 158 No 14 8.86% 8.86% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FNo Opinion 3 1.90% 1.90% % of Ballots 50.16% 158 100.00% 100.00% 71.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 142 89.87% 89.87% No. of Respondents 158 No 12 7.59% 7.59% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FNo Opinion 4 2.53% 2.53% % of Ballots 50.16% 158 100.00% 100.00% 71.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 136 86.08% 86.08% No. of Respondents 158 No 18 11.39% 11.39% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FNo Opinion 4 2.53% 2.53% % of Ballots 50.16% 158 100.00% 100.00% Page 68 of 70

71.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 108 68.35% 68.35% No. of Respondents 158 Good 30 18.99% 18.99% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Patrick FFair 10 6.33% 6.33% % of Ballots 50.16% Poor 10 6.33% 6.33% 158 100.00% 72: Morrisett all 72.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes 80 91.95% 91.95% No. of Respondents 87 No 6 6.90% 6.90% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrNo Opinion 1 1.15% 1.15% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 72.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes 80 91.95% 91.95% No. of Respondents 87 No 5 5.75% 5.75% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrNo Opinion 2 2.30% 2.30% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 72.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes 67 77.01% 77.01% No. of Respondents 87 No 11 12.64% 12.64% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrNo Opinion 9 10.34% 10.34% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 72.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes 75 86.21% 86.21% No. of Respondents 87 No 5 5.75% 5.75% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrNo Opinion 7 8.05% 8.05% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 72.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes 76 87.36% 87.36% No. of Respondents 87 No 4 4.60% 4.60% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrNo Opinion 7 8.05% 8.05% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 72.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes 77 88.51% 88.51% No. of Respondents 87 No 6 6.90% 6.90% Page 69 of 70

Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrNo Opinion 4 4.60% 4.60% % of Ballots 27.62% 87 100.00% 100.00% 72.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent 49 56.32% 56.32% No. of Respondents 87 Good 25 28.74% 28.74% Condition: Q9 has 'Hon. Lin MorrFair 7 8.05% 8.05% % of Ballots 27.62% Poor 6 6.90% 6.90% 87 100.00% Legend Question Type Type of question (BOOLEAN, RANK, SINGLE, MULTIPLE, PREFERENCE, MEMO or TEXT) No. of Respondents Number of voters eligible to answer this question (based on conditional ballot page logic) Condition:... Condition required for question to be included in the poll (only for questions on conditional ballot pages) % of Ballots % of voters eligible to answer this question (only for questions on conditional ballot pages) Number of Votes Number of ballots that selected a particular answer Number of Votes - Total Number of selected answers - excluding 'not answered' % of Respondents % of voters who were eligible to answer this question and who selected a particular answer % of Respondents - Total % of respondents who selected an asnwer (excludes 'not answered') % of Answers % of votes for a particular answer (always totals to 100%) Write-in response A write-in response to a SINGLE or MULTIPLE question Not Answered The 'not answered' option for an optional question (actual text specified by the poll designer) Page 70 of 70