2013 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the Tarrant County Bar Association, we are
|
|
|
- Thomas Wilkins
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox () Name 2013 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the, we are Online Voting 09/18/13 12:15am CDT to 10/11/13 05:00pm CDT Voter Information Eligible Voters 2270 Cast Online Ballots 489 Blank Online Ballots 43 % of eligible voters 21.54% 1.89% Report Information Report Generated 10/14/13 02:40pm CDT 1: Federal Courts Federal Courts Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. John McBryde (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of 145Texas) 29.65% 34.61% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Terry R. Means (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District 138 of Texas) 28.22% 32.94% Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District 41 of Texas) 8.38% 9.79% Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern 50District of Texas) 10.22% 11.93% Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern 45 District of Texas) 9.20% 10.74% % 2: State Appellate Courts State Appellate Courts Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Terrie Livingston (Chief Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 14.89% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 13.35% Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 15.40% Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 15.28% Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 16.56% Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 12.32% Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 12.20% % 3: State District Courts Civil State District Courts - Civil Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Melody Wilkinson (Judge, 17th District Court % 12.54% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. David Evans (Judge, 48th District Court) % 12.41% Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, 67th District Court) % 13.06% Hon. R. H. Wallace, Jr. (Judge, 96th District Court) % 8.64% Hon. John Chupp (Judge, 141st District Court) % 9.55% Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, 236th District Court) % 11.57% Hon. J. Wade Birdwell (Judge, 342nd District Court) % 8.64% Hon. Dana Womack (Judge, 348th District Court) % 11.83% Hon. Bonnie Sudderth (Judge, 352nd District Court) % 11.76% % 4: State District Courts - Family State District Courts - Family Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate Judge, 231st District Court) % 7.73% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. William Harris (Judge, 233rd District Court) % 9.23% Hon. Diane Haddock (Associate Judge, 233rd District Court) % 7.73% Hon. Nancy Berger (Judge, 322nd District Court) % 9.30% Hon. James Munford (Associate Judge, 322nd District Court) % 7.08% Hon. Jerome Hennigan (Judge, 324th District Court) % 9.51% Hon. Beth Poulos (Associate Judge, 324th District Court) % 6.87% Hon. Judith Wells (Judge, 325th District Court) % 9.08% Hon. Terri White (Associate Judge, 325th District Court) % 7.22% Hon. Mike Sinha (Judge, 360th District Court) % 8.73% Hon. Cynthia Mendoza (Associate Judge, 360th District Court) % 7.22% Hon. Steve Owen (Associate Judge, IV-D Court) % 5.36% Hon. Clifford Bronson (Associate Judge, IV-D Court) % 4.94% % 5: State District Courts - Juvenile State District Courts - Juvenile Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Jean Boyd (Judge, 323rd District Court) % 31.72% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Ellen Smith (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) % 24.23% Hon. Tim Menikos (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) % 24.23% Hon. Kim Brown (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) % 19.82% % Page 1 of 71
2 6: State District Courts - Criminal State District COURTS - Criminal Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Wayne Salvant (Judge, Criminal District #2) % 8.72% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Robb D. Catalano (Judge, Criminal District #3) % 7.95% Hon. Michael Thomas (Judge, Criminal District #4) % 7.62% Hon. Louis Sturns (Judge, 213th District Court) % 9.27% Hon. Everett Young (Judge, 297th District Court) % 8.61% Hon. Molly Westfall (Judge 371st District Court) % 7.17% Hon. Scott Wisch (Judge, 372nd District Court) % 8.06% Hon. George Gallagher (Judge, 396th District Court) % 9.27% Hon. Ruben Gonzalez (Judge 432nd District Court) % 8.17% Hon. Gene Grant (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 6.95% Hon. Cheyenne Minick (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 6.40% Hon. Timmie White (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 6.07% Hon. Matt King (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 5.74% % 7: County Courts - Civil County Courts - Civil Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Don Pierson (Judge, County Court at Law #1) % 34.49% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Jennifer Rymell (Judge, County Court at Law #2) % 35.42% Hon. Michael Hrabal (Judge, County Court at Law #3) % 30.09% % 8: County Courts - Criminal County Courts - Criminal Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Sherry Hill (Judge, Criminal Court #1) % 9.53% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Michael Mitchell (Judge, Criminal Court #2) % 9.35% Hon. Billy Mills (Judge, Criminal Court #3) % 10.61% Hon. Deborah Nekhom (Judge, Criminal Court #4) % 10.61% Hon. Jamie Cummings (Judge, Criminal Court #5) % 10.25% Hon. Molly Jones (Judge, Criminal Court #6) % 9.53% Hon. Cheril Hardy (Judge, Criminal Court #7) % 9.53% Hon. Daryl Coffey (Judge, Criminal Court #8) % 10.43% Hon. Brent Carr (Judge, Criminal Court #9) % 10.07% Hon. Phil Sorrells (Judge, Criminal Court #10) % 10.07% % 9: County Courts - Probate County Courts - Probate Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Steve King (Judge, Probate Court #1) % 31.10% No. of Respondents 489 Hon. Quentin McGown (Associate Judge, Probate Court #1) % 12.30% Hon. Patrick Ferchill (Judge, Probate Court #2) % 32.19% Hon. Lin Morrisett (Associate Judge, Probate Court #2) % 24.41% % Page 2 of 71
3 10: McBryde- all 10.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 64.83% No. of Respondents 145 No % 26.90% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, No Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 8.28% % of Ballots 29.65% % % 10.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 27.59% No. of Respondents 145 No % 66.90% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, No Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 5.52% % of Ballots 29.65% % % 10.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 57.93% No. of Respondents 145 No % 33.79% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, No Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 8.28% % of Ballots 29.65% % % 10.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.34% No. of Respondents 145 No % 8.28% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, No Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 1.38% % of Ballots 29.65% % % 10.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 66.90% No. of Respondents 145 No % 30.34% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, No Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.76% % of Ballots 29.65% % % 10.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 33.79% No. of Respondents 145 No % 57.93% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, No Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 8.28% % of Ballots 29.65% % % 10.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 18.62% No. of Respondents 145 Good % 17.93% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McBryde (Judge, Fair U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 21.38% % of Ballots 29.65% Poor % 42.07% % Page 3 of 71
4 11: Means - all 11.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 99.28% No. of Respondents 138 No % 0.72% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means No (Judge, Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 0.00% % of Ballots 28.22% % % 11.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % % No. of Respondents 138 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means No (Judge, Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 0.00% % of Ballots 28.22% % % 11.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.75% No. of Respondents 138 No % 5.07% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means No (Judge, Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.17% % of Ballots 28.22% % % 11.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 76.09% No. of Respondents 138 No % 17.39% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means No (Judge, Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 6.52% % of Ballots 28.22% % % 11.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 86.23% No. of Respondents 138 No % 9.42% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means No (Judge, Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.35% % of Ballots 28.22% % % 11.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 96.38% No. of Respondents 138 No % 2.17% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means No (Judge, Opinion U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 1.45% % of Ballots 28.22% % % 11.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 72.46% No. of Respondents 138 Good % 24.64% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R. Means Fair (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.90% % of Ballots 28.22% Poor % 0.00% % Page 4 of 71
5 12: Cureton - all 12.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 97.56% No. of Respondents 41 No % 2.44% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, No Opinion U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 0.00% % of Ballots 8.38% % % 12.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.12% No. of Respondents 41 No % 2.44% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, No Opinion U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.44% % of Ballots 8.38% % % 12.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.37% No. of Respondents 41 No % 7.32% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, No Opinion U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 7.32% % of Ballots 8.38% % % 12.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.68% No. of Respondents 41 No % 2.44% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, No Opinion U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.88% % of Ballots 8.38% % % 12.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.24% No. of Respondents 41 No % 4.88% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, No Opinion U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.88% % of Ballots 8.38% % % 12.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.24% No. of Respondents 41 No % 4.88% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, No Opinion U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.88% % of Ballots 8.38% % % 12.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 75.61% No. of Respondents 41 Good % 17.07% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Jeff Cureton (Judge, Fair U.S. Magistrate Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 7.32% % of Ballots 8.38% Poor % 0.00% % Page 5 of 71
6 13: Lynn- all 13.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 96.00% No. of Respondents 50 No % 4.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy No OpinionJudge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 0.00% % of Ballots 10.22% % % 13.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.00% No. of Respondents 50 No % 6.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy No OpinionJudge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 6.00% % of Ballots 10.22% % % 13.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.00% No. of Respondents 50 No % 4.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy No OpinionJudge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 6.00% % of Ballots 10.22% % % 13.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.00% No. of Respondents 50 No % 8.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy No OpinionJudge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.00% % of Ballots 10.22% % % 13.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.00% No. of Respondents 50 No % 8.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy No OpinionJudge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.00% % of Ballots 10.22% % % 13.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.00% No. of Respondents 50 No % 2.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy No OpinionJudge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 6.00% % of Ballots 10.22% % % 13.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 60.00% No. of Respondents 50 Good % 32.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy Fair Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.00% % of Ballots 10.22% Poor % 4.00% % Page 6 of 71
7 14: Nelms- all 14.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % % No. of Respondents 45 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy No Opinion Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 0.00% % of Ballots 9.20% % % 14.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 97.78% No. of Respondents 45 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy No Opinion Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.22% % of Ballots 9.20% % % 14.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.56% No. of Respondents 45 No % 4.44% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy No Opinion Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 0.00% % of Ballots 9.20% % % 14.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 97.78% No. of Respondents 45 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy No Opinion Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.22% % of Ballots 9.20% % % 14.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 97.78% No. of Respondents 45 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy No Opinion Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.22% % of Ballots 9.20% % % 14.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 97.78% No. of Respondents 45 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy No Opinion Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 2.22% % of Ballots 9.20% % % 14.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 75.56% No. of Respondents 45 Good % 20.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy Fair Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas)' % 4.44% % of Ballots 9.20% Poor % 0.00% % Page 7 of 71
8 15: Livingston- app 15.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.79% No. of Respondents 116 No % 7.76% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie Livingston No (Chief Opinion Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 3.45% % of Ballots 23.72% % % 15.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 94.83% No. of Respondents 116 No % 1.72% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie Livingston No (Chief Opinion Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 3.45% % of Ballots 23.72% % % 15.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.45% No. of Respondents 116 No % 17.24% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie Livingston No (Chief Opinion Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 4.31% % of Ballots 23.72% % % 15.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.45% No. of Respondents 116 No % 5.17% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie Livingston No (Chief Opinion Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 16.38% % of Ballots 23.72% % % 15.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.34% No. of Respondents 116 No % 7.76% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie Livingston No (Chief Opinion Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 6.90% % of Ballots 23.72% % % 15.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 54.31% No. of Respondents 116 Good % 27.59% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie Livingston Fair (Chief Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 12.07% % of Ballots 23.72% Poor % 6.03% % Page 8 of 71
9 16: Dauphinot- app 16.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 68.27% No. of Respondents 104 No % 24.04% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot No Opinion (Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 7.69% % of Ballots 21.27% % % 16.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 70.19% No. of Respondents 104 No % 20.19% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot No Opinion (Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 9.62% % of Ballots 21.27% % % 16.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 44.23% No. of Respondents 104 No % 42.31% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot No Opinion (Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 13.46% % of Ballots 21.27% % % 16.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 61.54% No. of Respondents 104 No % 13.46% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot No Opinion (Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 25.00% % of Ballots 21.27% % % 16.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.58% No. of Respondents 104 No % 25.96% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot No Opinion (Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 13.46% % of Ballots 21.27% % % 16.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 19.23% No. of Respondents 104 Good % 29.81% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot Fair (Justice, Second Court of Appeals)' % 29.81% % of Ballots 21.27% Poor % 21.15% % Page 9 of 71
10 17: Gardner - app 17.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.00% No. of Respondents 120 No % 5.83% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 4.17% % of Ballots 24.54% % % 17.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.33% No. of Respondents 120 No % 1.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 5.00% % of Ballots 24.54% % % 17.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.00% No. of Respondents 120 No % 10.83% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 9.17% % of Ballots 24.54% % % 17.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.00% No. of Respondents 120 No % 11.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 13.33% % of Ballots 24.54% % % 17.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.33% No. of Respondents 120 No % 6.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 10.00% % of Ballots 24.54% % % 17.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 57.50% No. of Respondents 120 Good % 30.00% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, Fair Second Court of Appeals)' % 10.00% % of Ballots 24.54% Poor % 2.50% % Page 10 of 71
11 18: Walker- app 18.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.80% No. of Respondents 119 No % 1.68% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 2.52% % of Ballots 24.34% % % 18.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 96.64% No. of Respondents 119 No % 0.84% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 2.52% % of Ballots 24.34% % % 18.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.92% No. of Respondents 119 No % 4.20% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 5.88% % of Ballots 24.34% % % 18.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.24% No. of Respondents 119 No % 2.52% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 9.24% % of Ballots 24.34% % % 18.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.60% No. of Respondents 119 No % 2.52% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 5.88% % of Ballots 24.34% % % 18.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 68.07% No. of Respondents 119 Good % 26.05% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, Fair Second Court of Appeals)' % 5.04% % of Ballots 24.34% Poor % 0.84% % Page 11 of 71
12 19: McCoy- app 19.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.37% No. of Respondents 129 No % 8.53% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 3.10% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 19.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.17% No. of Respondents 129 No % 13.18% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 4.65% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 19.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 77.52% No. of Respondents 129 No % 16.28% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 6.20% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 19.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.19% No. of Respondents 129 No % 6.20% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 18.60% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 19.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.40% No. of Respondents 129 No % 11.63% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 6.98% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 19.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 51.94% No. of Respondents 129 Good % 29.46% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, Fair Second Court of Appeals)' % 11.63% % of Ballots 26.38% Poor % 6.98% % Page 12 of 71
13 20: Meier - app 20.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.38% No. of Respondents 96 No % 9.38% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 6.25% % of Ballots 19.63% % % 20.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.54% No. of Respondents 96 No % 5.21% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 6.25% % of Ballots 19.63% % % 20.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 67.71% No. of Respondents 96 No % 12.50% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 19.79% % of Ballots 19.63% % % 20.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.17% No. of Respondents 96 No % 3.13% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 17.71% % of Ballots 19.63% % % 20.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.29% No. of Respondents 96 No % 6.25% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 11.46% % of Ballots 19.63% % % 20.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 40.63% No. of Respondents 96 Good % 39.58% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, Fair Second Court of Appeals)' % 16.67% % of Ballots 19.63% Poor % 3.13% % Page 13 of 71
14 21: Gabriel - app 21.1: integrity Do you have confidence in this Justice s integrity? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.11% No. of Respondents 95 No % 13.68% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 4.21% % of Ballots 19.43% % % 21.2: attentiveness Does this Justice interact attentively and respectfully Number toward of attorneys Votes % during of Respondents oral argument? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 77.89% No. of Respondents 95 No % 16.84% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 5.26% % of Ballots 19.43% % % 21.3: opinions Does this Justice author opinions and orders that are Number well-reasoned of Votes and % clearly of Respondents dispose of cases % of andother Answers appellate matters Question Type SINGLE Yes % 66.32% No. of Respondents 95 No % 20.00% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 13.68% % of Ballots 19.43% % % 21.4: timeliness To the best of your knowledge, does this Justice manage Number his of or Votes her docket % of efficiently Respondents andproductively? % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 69.47% No. of Respondents 95 No % 5.26% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 25.26% % of Ballots 19.43% % % 21.5: impartiality Does this Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type SINGLE Yes % 72.63% No. of Respondents 95 No % 12.63% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, No Opinion Second Court of Appeals)' % 14.74% % of Ballots 19.43% % % 21.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Number of Votes % of Respondents % of Answers Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 41.05% No. of Respondents 95 Good % 38.95% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee Gabriel (Justice, Fair Second Court of Appeals)' % 8.42% % of Ballots 19.43% Poor % 11.58% % Page 14 of 71
15 22: Wilkinson- all 22.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.23% No. of Respondents 193 No % 4.15% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson No (Judge, Opinion 17th District Court' % 3.63% % of Ballots 39.47% % % 22.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.75% No. of Respondents 193 No % 4.66% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson No (Judge, Opinion 17th District Court' % 2.59% % of Ballots 39.47% % % 22.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 74.09% No. of Respondents 193 No % 18.65% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson No (Judge, Opinion 17th District Court' % 7.25% % of Ballots 39.47% % % 22.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.31% No. of Respondents 193 No % 13.47% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson No (Judge, Opinion 17th District Court' % 6.22% % of Ballots 39.47% % % 22.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.76% No. of Respondents 193 No % 17.10% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson No (Judge, Opinion 17th District Court' % 4.15% % of Ballots 39.47% % % 22.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.64% No. of Respondents 193 No % 3.63% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson No (Judge, Opinion 17th District Court' % 6.74% % of Ballots 39.47% % % 22.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 58.03% No. of Respondents 193 Good % 23.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Wilkinson Fair(Judge, 17th District Court' % 12.44% % of Ballots 39.47% Poor % 6.22% % Page 15 of 71
16 23: Evans- all 23.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 86.39% No. of Respondents 191 No % 10.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, No Opinion 48th District Court)' % 2.62% % of Ballots 39.06% % % 23.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 72.77% No. of Respondents 191 No % 22.51% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, No Opinion 48th District Court)' % 4.71% % of Ballots 39.06% % % 23.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.63% No. of Respondents 191 No % 12.04% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, No Opinion 48th District Court)' % 7.33% % of Ballots 39.06% % % 23.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.43% No. of Respondents 191 No % 8.90% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, No Opinion 48th District Court)' % 3.66% % of Ballots 39.06% % % 23.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.25% No. of Respondents 191 No % 10.47% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, No Opinion 48th District Court)' % 6.28% % of Ballots 39.06% % % 23.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.63% No. of Respondents 191 No % 15.18% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, No Opinion 48th District Court)' % 4.19% % of Ballots 39.06% % % 23.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 55.50% No. of Respondents 191 Good % 27.23% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David Evans (Judge, Fair 48th District Court)' % 8.90% % of Ballots 39.06% Poor % 8.38% % Page 16 of 71
17 24: Cosby- all 24.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.56% No. of Respondents 201 No % 7.96% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, No Opinion 67th District Court)' % 3.48% % of Ballots 41.10% % % 24.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.55% No. of Respondents 201 No % 7.96% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, No Opinion 67th District Court)' % 1.49% % of Ballots 41.10% % % 24.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.62% No. of Respondents 201 No % 17.91% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, No Opinion 67th District Court)' % 6.47% % of Ballots 41.10% % % 24.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.05% No. of Respondents 201 No % 5.97% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, No Opinion 67th District Court)' % 3.98% % of Ballots 41.10% % % 24.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.06% No. of Respondents 201 No % 4.48% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, No Opinion 67th District Court)' % 7.46% % of Ballots 41.10% % % 24.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.08% No. of Respondents 201 No % 11.94% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, No Opinion 67th District Court)' % 4.98% % of Ballots 41.10% % % 24.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 54.73% No. of Respondents 201 Good % 26.87% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, Fair 67th District Court)' % 10.95% % of Ballots 41.10% Poor % 7.46% % Page 17 of 71
18 25: Wallace- all 25.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.73% No. of Respondents 133 No % 4.51% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, No Jr. (Judge, Opinion96th District Court)' % 3.76% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 25.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.98% No. of Respondents 133 No % 4.51% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, No Jr. (Judge, Opinion96th District Court)' % 4.51% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 25.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.71% No. of Respondents 133 No % 12.03% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, No Jr. (Judge, Opinion96th District Court)' % 5.26% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 25.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.47% No. of Respondents 133 No % 5.26% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, No Jr. (Judge, Opinion96th District Court)' % 5.26% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 25.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.71% No. of Respondents 133 No % 6.02% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, No Jr. (Judge, Opinion96th District Court)' % 8.27% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 25.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 86.47% No. of Respondents 133 No % 6.77% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, No Jr. (Judge, Opinion96th District Court)' % 6.77% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 25.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 66.92% No. of Respondents 133 Good % 21.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. R. H. Wallace, Fair Jr. (Judge, 96th District Court)' % 6.77% % of Ballots 27.20% Poor % 4.51% % Page 18 of 71
19 26: Chupp- all 26.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.67% No. of Respondents 147 No % 8.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, No Opinion 141st District Court)' % 7.48% % of Ballots 30.06% % % 26.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.63% No. of Respondents 147 No % 13.61% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, No Opinion 141st District Court)' % 4.76% % of Ballots 30.06% % % 26.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 65.99% No. of Respondents 147 No % 19.05% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, No Opinion 141st District Court)' % 14.97% % of Ballots 30.06% % % 26.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 86.39% No. of Respondents 147 No % 4.08% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, No Opinion 141st District Court)' % 9.52% % of Ballots 30.06% % % 26.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.63% No. of Respondents 147 No % 6.12% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, No Opinion 141st District Court)' % 12.24% % of Ballots 30.06% % % 26.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.99% No. of Respondents 147 No % 10.20% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, No Opinion 141st District Court)' % 6.80% % of Ballots 30.06% % % 26.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 46.26% No. of Respondents 147 Good % 29.25% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John Chupp (Judge, Fair 141st District Court)' % 14.97% % of Ballots 30.06% Poor % 9.52% % Page 19 of 71
20 27: Lowe- all 27.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 67.98% No. of Respondents 178 No % 23.03% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, No Opinion 236th District Court)' % 8.99% % of Ballots 36.40% % % 27.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.46% No. of Respondents 178 No % 15.17% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, No Opinion 236th District Court)' % 3.37% % of Ballots 36.40% % % 27.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.11% No. of Respondents 178 No % 29.78% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, No Opinion 236th District Court)' % 10.11% % of Ballots 36.40% % % 27.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.35% No. of Respondents 178 No % 20.79% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, No Opinion 236th District Court)' % 7.87% % of Ballots 36.40% % % 27.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 64.04% No. of Respondents 178 No % 25.28% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, No Opinion 236th District Court)' % 10.67% % of Ballots 36.40% % % 27.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 62.92% No. of Respondents 178 No % 25.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, No Opinion 236th District Court)' % 11.24% % of Ballots 36.40% % % 27.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 40.45% No. of Respondents 178 Good % 21.91% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, Fair 236th District Court)' % 20.79% % of Ballots 36.40% Poor % 16.85% % Page 20 of 71
21 28: Birdwell- all 28.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.71% No. of Respondents 133 No % 8.27% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell No (Judge, Opinion342nd District Court)' % 6.02% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 28.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 77.44% No. of Respondents 133 No % 18.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell No (Judge, Opinion342nd District Court)' % 3.76% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 28.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 74.44% No. of Respondents 133 No % 21.05% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell No (Judge, Opinion342nd District Court)' % 4.51% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 28.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.43% No. of Respondents 133 No % 21.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell No (Judge, Opinion342nd District Court)' % 6.77% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 28.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.43% No. of Respondents 133 No % 23.31% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell No (Judge, Opinion342nd District Court)' % 5.26% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 28.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.95% No. of Respondents 133 No % 12.78% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell No (Judge, Opinion342nd District Court)' % 8.27% % of Ballots 27.20% % % 28.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 39.10% No. of Respondents 133 Good % 36.09% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. J. Wade Birdwell Fair (Judge, 342nd District Court)' % 13.53% % of Ballots 27.20% Poor % 11.28% % Page 21 of 71
22 29: Womack- all 29.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.60% No. of Respondents 182 No % 3.30% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack No (Judge, Opinion 348th District Court)' % 1.10% % of Ballots 37.22% % % 29.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 97.80% No. of Respondents 182 No % 1.65% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack No (Judge, Opinion 348th District Court)' % 0.55% % of Ballots 37.22% % % 29.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.56% No. of Respondents 182 No % 7.14% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack No (Judge, Opinion 348th District Court)' % 3.30% % of Ballots 37.22% % % 29.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.21% No. of Respondents 182 No % 7.14% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack No (Judge, Opinion 348th District Court)' % 1.65% % of Ballots 37.22% % % 29.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.56% No. of Respondents 182 No % 7.69% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack No (Judge, Opinion 348th District Court)' % 2.75% % of Ballots 37.22% % % 29.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.86% No. of Respondents 182 No % 5.49% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack No (Judge, Opinion 348th District Court)' % 1.65% % of Ballots 37.22% % % 29.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 72.53% No. of Respondents 182 Good % 18.13% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana Womack Fair (Judge, 348th District Court)' % 6.59% % of Ballots 37.22% Poor % 2.75% % Page 22 of 71
23 30: Sudderth- all 30.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.58% No. of Respondents 181 No % 3.31% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth No (Judge, Opinion352nd District Court)' % 1.10% % of Ballots 37.01% % % 30.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.37% No. of Respondents 181 No % 4.42% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth No (Judge, Opinion352nd District Court)' % 2.21% % of Ballots 37.01% % % 30.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.53% No. of Respondents 181 No % 8.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth No (Judge, Opinion352nd District Court)' % 6.63% % of Ballots 37.01% % % 30.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.66% No. of Respondents 181 No % 11.60% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth No (Judge, Opinion352nd District Court)' % 7.73% % of Ballots 37.01% % % 30.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.08% No. of Respondents 181 No % 8.29% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth No (Judge, Opinion352nd District Court)' % 6.63% % of Ballots 37.01% % % 30.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.16% No. of Respondents 181 No % 6.08% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth No (Judge, Opinion352nd District Court)' % 2.76% % of Ballots 37.01% % % 30.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 62.98% No. of Respondents 181 Good % 25.97% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Sudderth Fair (Judge, 352nd District Court)' % 8.84% % of Ballots 37.01% Poor % 2.21% % Page 23 of 71
24 31: Beebe- all 31.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 76.85% No. of Respondents 108 No % 19.44% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate No Opinion Judge, 231st District Court)' % 3.70% % of Ballots 22.09% % % 31.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 59.26% No. of Respondents 108 No % 37.96% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate No Opinion Judge, 231st District Court)' % 2.78% % of Ballots 22.09% % % 31.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 64.81% No. of Respondents 108 No % 31.48% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate No Opinion Judge, 231st District Court)' % 3.70% % of Ballots 22.09% % % 31.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.89% No. of Respondents 108 No % 7.41% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate No Opinion Judge, 231st District Court)' % 3.70% % of Ballots 22.09% % % 31.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.30% No. of Respondents 108 No % 25.00% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate No Opinion Judge, 231st District Court)' % 3.70% % of Ballots 22.09% % % 31.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 66.67% No. of Respondents 108 No % 31.48% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate No Opinion Judge, 231st District Court)' % 1.85% % of Ballots 22.09% % % 31.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 35.19% No. of Respondents 108 Good % 25.93% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate Fair Judge, 231st District Court)' % 21.30% % of Ballots 22.09% Poor % 17.59% % Page 24 of 71
25 32: Harris - all 32.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 70.54% No. of Respondents 129 No % 22.48% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, No Opinion 233rd District Court)' % 6.98% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 32.2: attentiveness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 54.26% No. of Respondents 129 No % 36.43% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, No Opinion 233rd District Court)' % 9.30% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 32.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.32% No. of Respondents 129 No % 19.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, No Opinion 233rd District Court)' % 9.30% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 32.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.72% No. of Respondents 129 No % 10.85% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, No Opinion 233rd District Court)' % 5.43% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 32.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.29% No. of Respondents 129 No % 14.73% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, No Opinion 233rd District Court)' % 6.98% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 32.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.47% No. of Respondents 129 No % 31.01% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, No Opinion 233rd District Court)' % 8.53% % of Ballots 26.38% % % 32.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 38.76% No. of Respondents 129 Good % 29.46% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Harris (Judge, Fair 233rd District Court)' % 14.73% % of Ballots 26.38% Poor % 17.05% % Page 25 of 71
2011 Judicial Evaluation Tarrant County Bar Association. Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox (www.ballotboxonline.com) Name
Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox () Name 2011 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the, we are Online Voting 03/07/11 02:15pm CST to 03/28/11 05:00pm CDT
2016 GENERAL. Election Date: 11/08/2016
Official Election Notice County of CABARRUS 2016 GENERAL Election Date: 11/08/2016 This is an official notice of an election to be conducted in CABARRUS County on 11/08/2016. This notice contains a list
Chief Judge of the State of New York. Chief Administrative Judge. Deputy Chief Administrative Judge (Management Support)
Court of Appeals Chief Judge of the State of New York Administrative Board Chief Administrative Judge Presiding Justices Deputy Chief Administrative Judge (NYC Courts) Deputy Chief Administrative Judge
THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER. 2011-2012 Judicial Survey Results
THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER A Publication of The San Antonio Criminal Defense Lawyers Association MAY 2012 Special Edition 2011-2012 Judicial Survey Results Robert H. Featherston
2014 SUMMER SCHOOL FOR LAWYERS June 23-25, 2014 Sandestin, Florida Linkside Conference Center MONDAY, JUNE 23 RD
2014 SUMMER SCHOOL FOR LAWYERS June 23-25, 2014 Sandestin, Florida Linkside Conference Center MONDAY, JUNE 23 RD 8:00-9:00 A.M. Update on the 2014 Legislative Session and Its Impact on the Bench & Bar
NOTICE OF ANNUAL SECRET BALLOT ELECTIONS TO ELECT THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS OF THE ELLIS COUNTY BAIL BOND BOARD FOR THE 2016 TERM PURSUANT TO SECTION 1704
NOTICE OF ANNUAL SECRET BALLOT ELECTIONS TO ELECT THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS OF THE ELLIS COUNTY BAIL BOND BOARD FOR THE 2016 TERM PURSUANT TO SECTION 1704.0535 OF THE TEXAS OCCUPATIONS CODE Pursuant to Section
A JOINT RESOLUTION. proposing a constitutional amendment relating to requiring board
By:AAGattis H.J.R.ANo.A A JOINT RESOLUTION 0 proposing a constitutional amendment relating to requiring board certification for appellate judges and justices and to increasing the age and experience requirements
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas)
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas) The Basics 1. Court's Address: Court of Appeals, Fifth District, 600 Commerce Street, Suite 200, Dallas, Texas, 75202-4658 2. Telephone number: 214-712-3400 (main)
Date: 2/25/2014 2:40 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 User: Raechelle
Date: 2/25/2014 2:40 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 Page 1 of 7 User: Raechelle Civil Court Docket Sorted By: Hearing Date/Time-Case
Guide for Florida Voters
Judges rule on the basis of law, not public opinion, and they should be totally indifferent to pressures of the times. Warren E. Burger, chief justice, U.S. Supreme Court, 1969-1986 Guide for Florida Voters
Distinguished Professor of Judicial Studies, Washington and Lee University School of Law, 2007 present)
DONALD W. LEMONS CHIEF JUSTICE Supreme Court of Virginia 100 North Ninth Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 EMPLOYMENT: Currently: Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia Formerly: Justice, Supreme Court
2016 SUMMER EXTERNSHIPS THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
2016 SUMMER EXTERNSHIPS THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT The Los Angeles Superior Court is now accepting applications for 2016 summer externships. The Court offers full-time externships in the following
APPROVED for 8.0 CLE Credits 3.0 Ethics. Clarion Hotel & Conference Center 701 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631
APPROVED for 8.0 CLE Credits 3.0 Ethics Clarion Hotel & Conference Center 701 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Seminar Schedule 7:30 a.m. Registration Opens / Continental Breakfast 8:15 a.m. State of the Courts
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2013-002769 04/02/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES CLERK OF THE COURT D. Glab Deputy GERALD C FREEMAN TIMOTHY A LASOTA v. RICHARD ESSER, et al. JEFFREY
Election Summary Report Wayne County, Ohio General Election November 4, 2008 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races OFFICIAL RESULTS
Election Summary Report Wayne County, Ohio General Election November 4, 2008 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races OFFICIAL RESULTS 11/25/08 11:13:00 Registered Voters 73217 President
BEST LAWYERS RECOGNIZES 77 MVA ATTORNEYS. August 2013
August 2013 Moore & Van Allen PLLC is pleased to announce that 77 attorneys representing 19 of the Firm s primary practice areas were selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 93- ADOPTION OF AMENDED RULES FOR HARRIS COUNTY FOR RECEIVING AND FILING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED COURT DOCUMENTS ORDERED: At the request of the District
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 12-9 2 0 t ORDER REQUIRING ELECTRONIC FILING IN CERTAIN COURTS This order mandates electronic filing ("e-filing") in civil cases, including family and probate
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA In the Matter of: ) ) ESTABLISHING THE ARIZONA ) Administrative Order COMMISSION ON ACCESS ) No. 2014-83 TO JUSTICE ) ) ) The Judiciary s Strategic Agenda,
WITNESS LIST. Criminal Justice March 10, 2015 1:30 PM - or upon adjournment
SB 135 Baker, Janet (Her son), Houston, Cole, Cynthia (Greater Houston Coalition for Justice), Houston, Douglas, Durrel (Self), Houston, Hill, Belinda First Assistant District Attorney (Harris County District
2014 Judicial Performance Survey Report 20th Judicial District
State of Colorado Logo COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE The Honorable Judith L. LaBuda 2014 Judicial Performance Survey Report 20th Judicial District March 26, 2014 The Honorable Judith L. LaBuda Boulder
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS H053. Misc. Docket No. ---- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS H053 Misc. Docket No. ---- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby assigns the Honorable Alan
2nd Circuit Drug Court Est. August 1, 2003. 4th Circuit Drug Court
2nd Circuit Drug Court Est. August 1, 2003 Acting Coordinator: Harrison, Hancock, and Stone Hon. Stephen S. Simpson P.O. Box 1570 Gulfport, MS 39502 (228) 865-4880 Phone (228) 865-4376 Fax Hon. Roger T.
Date: 10/15/2015 12:36 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 User: Raechelle
Date: 10/15/2015 12:36 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 Page 1 of 8 User: Raechelle Civil Court Docket Sorted By: Hearing Date/Time-Case
Law In Colorado Colorado Bar Association Public Legal Education Committee 2004
Law In Colorado Colorado Bar Association Public Legal Education Committee 2004 PREFACE These materials were written to supplement Street Law: A Course in Practical Law, 7 th Ed. (McGraw Hill Glencoe, 2005).
PETERSON, JOHNSON & MURRAY, S.C. 788 North Jefferson Street Suite 500 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 P: 414.278.8800 F: 414.278.0920 www.pjmlaw.
The Harmonie Group Firm Honor Recognition Summary Wisconsin Harmonie Firm Liaison Clayton L. Riddle Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C. 788 N. Jefferson Street, Suite 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 414-278-8800
U.S. DISTRICT COURT - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Applicable General Orders Index - 4/1/98
U.S. DISTRICT COURT - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Applicable General Orders Index - 4/1/98 Former 98-1 3/1/98 Identifying those General Orders which are 1 now obsolete 98-2 (92) 1/22/82 Jurisdiction of U.S. Magistrate
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, 1997. September 09, 1997 No. 02C01-9610-CR-00320 Appellant )
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, 1997 FILED JOHNNY LEE MUKES, ) ) September 09, 1997 No. 02C01-9610-CR-00320 Appellant ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) SHELBY COUNTY Appellate
MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Bob
CRAVEN BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST
CRAVEN BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST CRITERIA: Election: 03/15/2016, Show Contest w/o Candidate: Y US PRESIDENT US PRESIDENT US PRESIDENT US SENATE WRIGHT, PAUL MICHAEL 12/01/2015 147 SWINSON
New Directions new challenges
New Directions new challenges 2011 Workers Compensation Court Educational Conference September 15-16, 2011 Meridian Technology Center Stillwater, Oklahoma details/registration available at meridiantech.edu
Juvenile Justice Resources
The Texas Criminal Justice Coalition promotes criminal and juvenile justice solutions that embody the principles of effective management, accountability, public safety, and human and civil rights. Listed
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF ==> Download: HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF - Are you searching for Harris County Criminal Lawyer Books? Now, you will be happy that
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE On Brief September 13, 2006
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE On Brief September 13, 2006 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JIMMY DANIEL PRATER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 13328 Robert L. Jones,
Misc Docket No. 98-9033
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 98-9033 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Faith
Judicial Council of Virginia. Report to the General Assembly and Supreme Court of Virginia
2012 Judicial Council of Virginia Report to the General Assembly and Supreme Court of Virginia The Judicial Council of Virginia 2012 Report to the General Assembly and Supreme Court of Virginia Supreme
Mediation: Whither or Whether. B. Selected Local Bankruptcy Rules Addressing Mediation/ADR...10
Page 1 of 93 Mediation: Whither or Whether A. Survey Chart...3 B. Selected Local Bankruptcy Rules Addressing Mediation/ADR...10 1. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York Local
Consolidated Case Nos. 04SA396 and 05SA22, State of Colorado v. City and County of Denver and Sternberg v. City and County of Denver.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us/supct/supct.htm Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
Turning the Tide: Strategies For Defending Domestic Violence
THE ELEVENTH ANNUAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONFERENCE Turning the Tide: Strategies For Defending Domestic Violence March 5 6, 2007 Fordham Law School Victims CO-SPONSORS: Appellate Division, First Department
UNITED STATES SENATE GOVERNOR OFFICIAL BALLOT STATE OF TENNESSEE. Vote For One (1) 0 selected, incomplete BEDFORD COUNTY AUGUST 7, 2014
OFFICIAL BALLOT STATE OF TENNESSEE BEDFORD COUNTY AUGUST 7, 2014 REPUBLICAN PRIMARY UNITED STATES SENATE CHRISTIAN AGNEW LAMAR ALEXANDER JOE CARR GOVERNOR MARK COONRIPPY BROWN BILL HASLAM BASIL MARCEAUX,
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mary Lou
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL CASE NO. SC11-399 PROCEDURE, FLORIDA PROBATE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-02038-COA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-02038-COA VIOLET MEEKINS AND ALEX GATES, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI FOR AND ON BEHALF OF VIOLET MEEKINS APPELLANTS
Misc. Docket No. Il--------- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action
ER OF T H E SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. Il---------.91. 88 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable
How To Make An Animal Cruelty Case In The United States
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2010 8:00-8:30 a.m. REGISTRATION AND CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST 8:30 9:30 a.m. OPENING REMARKS/CONFERENCE INTRODUCTIONS 9:30 9:45 a.m. BREAK Danica Szarvas-Kidd Senior Policy Advisor
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Phillip
Conference Mission Statement
Conference Mission Statement Profound racial and ethnic disparities exist in the American criminal justice system and concrete reform is needed to address them. The New York County Lawyers Association,
PRE-GRADUATION JUDICIAL INTERNSHIPS
PRE-GRADUATION JUDICIAL INTERNSHIPS and Internships at the United States Attorney s Office, the Federal Public Defender s Office, and the Bexar County District Attorney s Office PROFESSOR VINCENT R. JOHNSON
PROGRAM AGENDA. 6:00 PM 7:00 PM Welcome Reception (for conference registrants, spouses/guests and children)
THE VIRGINIA BAR ASSOCIATION 41st Annual Conference on Labor Relations and Employment Law September 15-17, 2011 Williamsburg Lodge and Conference Center PROGRAM AGENDA Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:00
Misc Docket No. 97-91-26
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 97-91-26 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Jack
Misc Docket No. 99-9027
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 99-9027 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Wayne
CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST
CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST CRITERIA: Election: 05/08/2012, Show Contest w/o Candidate: Y NC COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE NC COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE NC COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE
F THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
F THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. = 9075 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Sid L. Harle,
1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. No. A--2000-1 REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF TEXAS. 55 S.W.3d 243; 2000 Tex. LEXIS 83
Page 1 1 of 2 DOCUMENTS In re Honorable Thomas G. JONES, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 7, Place 1, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, Judicial Disciplinary Proceeding No. A--2000-1 REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF TEXAS
Registering, but not testifying: For:
Criminal Jurisprudence Committee March 25, 2015-10:30 AM or upon final adjourn./recess HB 207 HB 265 Bragiel, Justin (Texas Hotel and Lodging Association) Chandler, Gary (Texas DPS Officers Association)
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT,
[Cite as State v. Brown, 142 Ohio St.3d 92, 2015-Ohio-486.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BROWN, APPELLEE. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SHIPLEY, APPELLEE. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCCLOUDE,
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. âboclkct No. 01-9002 Appointment of a District Judge to Rule on a Motion to Recuse filed in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN R. MALONEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-50311 D.C. No. 3:10-cr-02803-DMS-1 ORDER
The Texas Judicial System. Criminal Appeals, in Courts of Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in
The Texas Judicial System The judicial power of the State of Texas is derived from Article 5, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, which provides: The judicial power of this State shall be vested in one
Supreme Court of Appeals State of West Virginia
Supreme Court of Appeals State of West Virginia News Administrative Office 1900 Kanawha Blvd., East Bldg. 1, Room E-316 Charleston, West Virginia 25305 (304) 340-2305 Jennifer Bundy (304) 340-2306 April
SARASOTA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION
Present: Meeting Summary June 27, 2011 Ed Brodsky for Earl Moreland David Bullock Larry Eger Lee Haworth George Scott for Tom Knight Bill Little Daryl Promey Karen Rushing Walt Smith Jon Thaxton State
The Weld County Bar Association, Inc. and the 19th Judicial District Bench-Bar Committee are pleased to present the 8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE.
8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE The Weld County Bar Association, Inc. and the 19th Judicial District Bench-Bar Committee are pleased to present the 8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE. Friday, December 9, 2011 at
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION CHAPTER 159, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE BY COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Effective September 1, 2013 (Revised 09/01/2015) Texas Ethics Commission, P.O. Box 12070,
MOTION FOR CITATION BY PUBLICATION ON THE UNKNOWN OBJECTING BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE TEL OFFSHORE TRUST
CAUSE NO. C-1-PB-14-001245 Filed: 7/23/2014 10:03:33 AM Dana DeBeauvoir Travis County Clerk c-1-pb-14-001245 Olivia Ruiz IN RE: IN THE PROBATE COURT OF TEL OFFSHORE TRUST TRAVIS COUNTY, T E X A S MOTION
The North Carolina DA List
Ben David 5th Prosecutorial District P.O. Box 352 Wilmington, NC 28402 Phone (910) 341-1401 Fax (910) 341-4515 Bill Graham 6-A Prosecutorial District P.O. Box 126 Halifax, NC 27839 Phone (252) 583-4801
FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: February 28, 2011 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4.3 (a) REAPPOINTMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AND APPOINT NEW JUDGES PRO TEMPORE
FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: February 28, 2011 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4.3 (a) TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JANE AIKEN, MUNICPAL COURT JUDG@ REAPPOINTMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AND APPOINT NEW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff,
23 CASE 0:12-cr-00026-JRT-JSM Document 597 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal No. 12-26 (JRT/JSM) Plaintiff, v. (1) WAKINYON
FEDERAL PRACTICE SEMINAR
Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:00 a.m. to 1:20 p.m. Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse 300 North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, FL The Federal Bar Association, Jacksonville Chapter, announces the 6 th Annual
2011 Interim Judicial Performance Survey 20th Judicial District
State of Colorado Logo COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE The Honorable Thomas F. Mulvahill 2011 Interim Judicial Performance Survey 20th Judicial District May 6, 2011 The Honorable Thomas F. Mulvahill
PRE-GRADUATION JUDICIAL INTERNSHIPS
PRE-GRADUATION JUDICIAL INTERNSHIPS and Internships at the United States Attorney s Office, the Federal Public Defender s Office, and the Bexar County District Attorney s Office PROFESSOR VINCENT R. JOHNSON
MAYOR DE BLASIO APPOINTS 26 JUDGES TO FAMILY, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURT
THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE MAYOR NEW YORK, NY 10007 MAYOR DE BLASIO APPOINTS 26 JUDGES TO FAMILY, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURT NEW YORK Mayor de Blasio has made 26 judicial appointments for the New
UNPUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
UNPUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION WILLIAM ELLIS VANCE ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. BOB KEARY WILLIAMS, ET AL., Defendants. Case No. 1:03CV00136
No. 02-10190 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT LUCINDA G. MILLER; ELAINE KING-MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees
No. 02-10190 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT LUCINDA G. MILLER; ELAINE KING-MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, Defendant-Appellant
Monday, September 18, 2010. Hightower v. Baylor University Medical Center Cause No. 05-10-00300-CV Fifth District Court of Appeals. Teaching Materials
Monday, September 18, 2010 Hightower v. Baylor University Medical Center Cause No. 05-10-00300-CV Fifth District Court of Appeals Teaching Materials The Facts... 1 The Trial Court Proceeding... 1 The Appeal...
Misc Docket No. 98-9020
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 98-9020 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Horace
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY PAGE 1 10/02/15 14:45
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY PAGE 1 JUDGE WILLIAM V TUCKER COURTROOM 1 Lee vs Darnell 13-C-14-098399 8:30AM Status Conference To be heard by Judge Tucker Time estimate: 30 minutes *Amended to include
No. 05-10-01016-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. FRED ANDERSON, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05-10-01016-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS FRED ANDERSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 5 of Dallas County,
LOCAL RULES OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR THE TIMELY AND FAIR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT DEFENDANTS BY ORANGE COUNTY COURTS
LOCAL RULES OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR THE TIMELY AND FAIR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT DEFENDANTS BY ORANGE COUNTY COURTS EXERCISING FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR JURISDICTION The undersigned Judges of District
Justice Information Management Systems (JIMS)
Justice Information Management Systems (JIMS) Tim Mulcahy timothy.mulcahy@jocogov.org Johnson County Kansas 10 th Judicial District Court General Jurisdiction: Population 540,000 19 Judges, 4 Magistrate
Medina County Domestic Relations Court Detail Schedule Jackie Owen:
Monday, March 19, 2012 1:00 pm 11PA0289 Event / Filing: Objection to CSEA Administrative Findings Case Name: Carter, Jeremy D vs. Carter, Margaret S Medina County Child Support Enforceme Monday, March
FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES
FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES In the United States, we are governed by both national and state governments and our rights are protected by state and federal Constitutions. Basically,
The Advisory Committee of the Supreme Court of Texas convened at 8:30 o'clock on Friday, May 16, 1997, pursuant to call of the Chair.
MINUTES OF THE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 16, 1997 The Advisory Committee of the Supreme Court of Texas convened at 8:30 o'clock on Friday, May 16, 1997, pursuant to call of the Chair. Friday,
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 97-_go I
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 97-_go I Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable George
WEBSTER PARISH DISTRICT COURT DOCKET - December 4, 2015
ANDERSON, ASHLEY N. 90975 CT.2 Speeding 16-24 MPH BOOS, JOSHUA A 90366 14:98.A(1). - Operating A Vehicle While Intoxicated - Second Offense A Trial SIBPD IvanDaigs T-1163-15 Improper Turning Through or
James W. McElhaney, McElhaney s Trial Notebook. R. Lawrence Dessem, Pretrial Litigation in a Nutshell
ABOTA TRIAL PRACTICE LECTURE SERIES Spring 2013 Mondays 8-9:50 a.m. 2 credit hours January 14 to April 22 Classroom #339, University of School of Law Course Textbooks: James W. McElhaney, McElhaney s Trial
How To Become A Court Appointed Attorney
Court Appointed Attorney Application Ninth Judicial Circuit (Orange and Osceola Counties) Florida law requires that the Chief Judge of the Circuit compile a list of attorneys in private practice, by county
RICHARD A. BROWN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
QDA QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 2 ND ANNUAL MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION The Queens County District Attorney s Office is sponsoring its 2 nd annual mock trial competition to be held on October 24 - October
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA FREDDIE LEE MARTIN A/K/A FREDDIE L. MARTIN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/08/2013 TRIAL JUDGE:
NO. 05-11-00657-CR. GLEN FRAZIER, Appellant. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW
NO. 05-11-00657-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/23/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk GLEN FRAZIER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Court of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Brown v. Bur. of Workers Comp., 2011-Ohio-3695.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96209 EDWIN O. BROWN, JR. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM California Courts and the Judicial System Unlike the federal system, in which judges are appointed by the president, confirmed by the Senate, and serve for life
If you are in doubt, or think you may not be qualified to serve on a jury for one of the above or any other reasons, please notify the judge.
Jurors are randomly selected by the county computer system from a source which combines current Medina County voter registration list and residents of the county that hold a valid Texas drivers license
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 96-9i72
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 96-9i72 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Terry
MS Psychology, December 1988 First Year Project: The Conjunction Error in Simulated Juror Decision Making. Visiting Professor of Legal Writing
1418 E 23 rd Ave. Eugene, Oregon 97403 rrocklin@uoregon.edu 541-342-3954 EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF OREGON PhD Social Psychology expected 2017 Areas of interest: empirical legal studies; legal decision making;
WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List
WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List PLEASE COMPLETE THIS ENTIRE PAGE Date: Name: Birth Date: Business Address: Day Phone:
At a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court held in and for the First Judicial Department in the County of New York on November 29, 2012.
Present: Hon. Luis A. Gonzalez, Respondent, M-5050 -against- Ind. Nos. 5350/11 3439/12 Herbie Brown, Defendant having moved for leave to prosecute, as a poor person, the appeal from a judgment of the Supreme
NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A Article 16 1
Article 16. Magistrates. 7A-170. Nature of office and oath; age limit for service. (a) A magistrate is an officer of the district court. Before entering upon the duties of his office, a magistrate shall
FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Chairman Commissioner Stephens
FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Chairman Commissioner Stephens FINANCE Mr. Travis Hulsey (Acting) 1. Unusual Demand Report dated 3/13/12 2. Fixed Asset Transactions Commission approval is
2015 SUMMER PLACEMENT & WORK EXPERIENCE OPPORTUNITIES
2015 SUMMER PLACEMENT & WORK EXPERIENCE OPPORTUNITIES Batch 4 You may wish to apply for one of the following competitive placement and work experience opportunities run by legal and other organisations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 6, 2010 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 6, 2010 Session MARTHA GRAHAM v. CLINTON CAPLES ET AL. Interlocutory Appeal by Permission from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-002150-08 Kay