Head-Up Display system



Similar documents
FedEx HUD/EFVS Update Aviation New Technology Workshop June 7th, 2012, Beijing, China

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR. OC NO 2 OF 2014 Date: 1 st May Continuous Descent Final Approach (CDFA) 1. PURPOSE

Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS)

Global Avionics Training Specialists, LLC.

SYSTEM GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM LANDING TECHNOLOGY/PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Compiled by Matt Zagoren

Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B)

12 AERO Second-Quarter 2003 April CAPT. RAY CRAIG 737 CHIEF PILOT FLIGHT OPERATIONS BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES

Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance. getting to grips with. CAT II / CAT III operations

A new dimension in infotainment

Aviation Safety Prize ecfi Tasks

ILS Replacement. ACI World Safety Seminar November 2008 Kempinski Hotel Beijing Lufthansa Centre

Michael Harrison Aviation Management Associates Alternative PNT Public Meeting Stanford University August Federal Aviation Administration

MEMO AIRBUS A319/A320/A321. SOP / Flow Pattern

Delivering the most complete avionics modernization solution for H-60 and S-70 helicopters.

Cessna 172SP & NAV III Maneuvers Checklist

INITIAL TEST RESULTS OF PATHPROX A RUNWAY INCURSION ALERTING SYSTEM

PRESENTATION. Patrick Ky Executive Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

3D Vision An enabling Technology for Advanced Driver Assistance and Autonomous Offroad Driving

S TEC. List of Effective Pages. Record of Revisions

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

SESAR Air Traffic Management Modernization. Honeywell Aerospace Advanced Technology June 2014

This is the fourth of a series of Atlantic Sun Airways CAT B pilot procedures and checklists for our fleet. Use them with good judgment.

Multi-Engine Training And The PTS

Evolution in Regional Aircraft Avionics

TRAINING PROGRAM FOR AIRPORT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL

Flight crew awareness and alertness are key factors in the

ADS-B is intended to transform air traffic control by providing more accurate and reliable tracking of airplanes in flight and on the ground.

Airbus A320 wingstrike at Hamburg Airport going around the world within hours via YouTube. Johann Reuss

This is the third of a series of Atlantic Sun Airways CAT B pilot procedures and checklists for our fleet. Use them with good judgment.

Data Review and Analysis Program (DRAP) Flight Data Visualization Program for Enhancement of FOQA

LOG OF REVISIONS Revision Page FAA Date of Number Number(s) Description Approved Approval A All Initial Release K.

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 4.2 Energy Management

B777. Automatic Flight DO NOT USE FOR FLIGHT

Minimum Safety Requirements for Helicopter Landing Areas used on Regular basis.

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 5.3 Visual Illusions

Light Sport West Standard Flight Training Procedures for N110GX (Remos GX, 100 H.P.)

Procedures related event Melbourne Airport, VIC

Cessna 172S. Flight Training Standardization Guide REVISION: ORIGINAL

Introduction to the iefis Explorer

OPERATING MINIMA FOR AEROPLANES AND HELICOPTER OPERATIONS PURPOSE REFERENCE 4.0 DEFINITION

FLIGHT TRAINING (AEROPLANE) BASED ON JAR FCL - PPL(A) FLIGHT INSTRUCTION Syllabus

09 FLIGHT MANAGEMENT, NAVIGATION

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A07A0025 LOSS OF SEPARATION

SERIOUS INCIDENT. Aircraft Type and Registration: No & Type of Engines: 2 SNECMA CFM 56-7B turbofan engines. Year of Manufacture: 1999

BE76 Beechcraft Duchess Maneuvers Checklist

Oral Preparation Questions

Global Positioning System Steering (GPSS) Converter Pilot s Operating Handbook

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Area Navigation (RNAV)/Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP s) and the New Charting Format.

Revision Number Revision Date Insertion Date/Initials 1 st Ed. Feb 01, 00 2 nd Ed. Jun 24, 02 3rd Ed. Feb 15, 07

UAS Control From a Moving Platform - A Preliminary Simulator Study

a. AC 25-7, Flight Test Guide for Certification of Transport Category Airplanes.

This section includes performance data on the King Air B200. Information consists of:

CHAPTER 6. Precision Approach Systems

General Characteristics

Eye-Tracking Research in an A330 Full Flight Simulator

Memorandum Date: February 5, 2014

PPL(H) Night Rating Course

AVIATION TRAINING ACADEMY

Pilot Professionalism It Isn t Just For The Big Guys

APPENDIX 3-B Airplane Upset Recovery Briefing. Briefing. Figure 3-B.1

AN AIRCRAFT TAXI SIMULATION MODEL FOR THE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE LOUISVILLE AIR PARK. W. Swain Ottman Angela C. Ford Gregory R.

Current Challenges in UAS Research Intelligent Navigation and Sense & Avoid

Ar Drone Controller Version and above

CYCLOPS OSD USER MANUAL 5.0

Official Journal of the European Union L 296/69

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

Avro RJ100, HB-IYU. 47 years

INCIDENT. Aircraft Type and Registration: Boeing 737-8K5, G-FDZR. No & Type of Engines: 2 CFM56-7B27/3 turbofan engines. Year of Manufacture: 2009

SEE FURTHER. GO ANYWHERE

SPORT PILOT TRAINING SYLLABUS

Preliminary Analysis of an Aircraft Capable of Deploying and Retracting a

Certification Specifications for Large Rotorcraft CS-29

HAZUBA. HAZUBA AG Rainstrasse Zuchwil T F info@hazuba.ch 06/14

ENGINE FIRE / SEVERE DAMAGE / SEPARATION ON TAKEOFF

CAAP 89W-1(0) Guidelines on provision of obstacle information for take-off flight planning purposes

Título ponencia: RNP APCH Implementation

Low Level Windshear Alert System (LLWAS) An integral part of the U.S. FAA Wind-shear safety program

Integrated surface management Herve Drevillon (DSNA) Airport safety support tools for pilots, vehicle drivers and controllers Nicolas Leon (DSNA)

THE SESAR CONCEPT AND SWIM. David Bowen Head of ATM Operations & Systems SESAR Joint Undertaking

Aerospace Engineering 3521: Flight Dynamics. Prof. Eric Feron Homework 6 due October 20, 2014

AIRCRAFT WARNING LIGHTS

3D Vision An enabling Technology for Advanced Driver Assistance and Autonomous Offroad Driving

Stop Alert Flasher with G-Force sensor

CASE STUDY. Uniphore Software Systems Contact: Website: 1

ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course Handout N 5 Cuzco International Airport operation

Tube Control Measurement, Sorting Modular System for Glass Tube

Flight Safety Foundation. Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction. Tool Kit. FSF ALAR Briefing Note 8.3 Landing Distances

MANUAL ON SIMULTANEOUS OPERATIONS ON PARALLEL OR NEAR-PARALLEL INSTRUMENT RUNWAYS (SOIR)

PAR-2000 GCA-2000 MPN-25 TASR MPN-14K MPN-26 (MACS) Gilfillan. Air Traffic Control

Auto Head-Up Displays: View-Through for Drivers

CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

Basic Principles of Inertial Navigation. Seminar on inertial navigation systems Tampere University of Technology

Transcription:

Head-Up Display system Enhanced operations situational awareness Innovation is at the heart of activities and Airbus ensures that its aircraft benefit from the most ad vanced technology available. During the end of 2002, Airbus decided to provide the HUD (Head-Up Display) as an option on its commercial aircraft (and as the basic instrument to operate the Airbus A400M military transport aircraft). A new generation HUD, called MPP (Multi-Programme Project) HUD, has been developed and proposed on the A320, A330/ A340 aircraft families, as well as on the A380. This MPP HUD, based on proven technologies already available on all aircraft within the Airbus Fly-By-Wire family, is being further optimized for the A350 XWB and will be proposed as an option at its Entry-Into-Service. Eric ALBERT HUD Project Leader Airbus Cockpit Engineering 24

The Head-Up Display (HUD) system The fundamental element of the HUD system is a conformal headup display that presents essential flight information and guidance to the pilot in his forward field of view for all flight phases. The HUD is a see-through device which helps the pilots to fly more accurately, displaying collimated flying symbols overlaying the real outside world view. The new generation HUD systems are from a single source SFE (Supplier Furnishing Equipment). System overview COCKPIT INTEGRATION The HUD System is fully inte grated into the existing cockpits. Either single or dual installation configurations for the MPP HUD (on A320, A330/A340 aircraft families and the A380) are available as a forward fit. Only the dual installation configuration is cur - rent ly proposed for the A350XWB. The HUD system com prises a: Head-Up Display Computer (HUDC): For data collection, display management, graphics generation and BITE (Built-In Test Equipment) management on A320, A330/A340 aircraft families and A380, or a Display Unit (DU) on A350XWB (basically installed), Head-up Projection Unit (HPU): Display device, drive electronics and projection optics, Head-up Combiner Unit (HCU): Optical element (glass plate), mounted behind the windshield which reflects the projected image towards the pilot, Personalization Memory Module (PMM): For memorization of the electronic bore-sighting parameters. The HUDC receives data from the aircraft s sensors and generates the display symbology. The HPU includes a LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) imager that projects the image onto the HCU. The HCU is an optical element (a glass plate), mounted between the pilot s head and the windshield which reflects the projected image towards the pilot. Whilst the superimposed image (to infinity) provides flight information to the pilot, he can continue to see external scenes in a completely normal way (through the HCU s glass plate). The PMM allows the memorization of the electronic bore-sighting para meters. This electronic process consists in aligning the optical references of the HUD cockpit equipment with those of the aircraft. HPU PMM information The certifications of the new MPP HUD system were achieved on the following dates: A318 (PW): 23 rd Nov 2007, A320 & A318 (CFM): 17 th Dec 2007, A319 (CFM): 18 th March 2008, A380 dual HUD (EA): 31 st July 2009. The certifications on A319 and A320 aircraft with IAE engines are forecasted by the end of 2010. The certification on other aircraft models (e.g. A330/A340 Family and A321) will depend on the customers requests. HCU HUDC MPP HUD components in the cockpit (A320, A330/A340 aircraft families and A380) Courtesy of Thales Avionics 25

notes The Display Global Work Package is a system platform integrating and regrouping the functions of the Cockpit Display System (CDS), the Head-Up Display and the Airport Navigation. New A350 XWB HUD components integrated in the cockpit MPP HUD (MULTI-PROGRAMME PROJECT HEAD-UP DISPLAY) The single installation con figu - ration is composed of one HUD set (HUDC+HPU+HCU+PMM) installed on the Captain s side. For the dual installation, one HUD set installed on the First Officer s side completes the single installation. In accordance with the MPP HUD development policy, one of the most ambitious challenges was that one same HUD be installed in the A320, A330/A340 aircraft families and A380 aircraft cockpits, despite their different architectures. This target has been achieved since the HUD part numbers remain the same, whatever the Airbus aircraft. This offers the benefit of having the Airbus cockpit commonality and brings cost savings to the operators in terms of maintenance and spares. A350XWB HUD The dual installation configuration (upon the A350XWB basic con fi - gura tion) is composed of two HUD cockpit equipment sets (HPU, HCU and PMM). The HUD part numbers for the A350XWB are specific to this aircraft because the HUDC is no longer needed, as the software is hosted in the Head Down Display as part of the Display Global Work Package (see A350XWB HUD overall system architecture), there - fore saving space and weight. The MPP HUD system was the first fully digital HUD certified on a civil aircraft. Indeed, it is the first HUD based on the LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) technology and not on the commonly used CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) technology. For the HUD, the LCD technology provides an increased reliability and a great image luminosity. It also provides advantages in volu - me, weight and consumption sa - vings that greatly reduces the ope - rational costs when the aircraft is equipped with such a system. The LCD technology offers additional graphic capabilities without time disruptions (reverse video, haloing effect, priorities, line thickness, grey level, etc.) and a good quality and legibility of the symbols. HUD Projection and Combiner Units in the cockpit HUD Computer in the avionics bay 26

MPP HUD - Overall system architecture PMM-CAPT PMM-F/O 115V aircraft HPU-CAPT HCU-CAPT HCU-F/O HPU-F/O 115V aircraft CAPT-HUD controle (411VU) F/O-HUD controle (412VU) HUDC-1 HUDC-2 AFDX Aircraft avionics systems Single installation Dual installation AFDX Aircraft avionics systems The main benefits introduced by the new A350 HUD compared to the MPP product are: Weight savings and volume linked to the integrated architecture as part of the Display Global Work Package (no additional HUDC), More integrated solutions in the cockpit layout (linings, etc.), Better reliability based on LED backlighting (instead of lamps) for the LCD display, Better head clearance, Better optical performances (e.g. with regards to the eyes motion box defining the three dimensional area in space in which the centre of the HUD virtual display can be viewed with at least one eye). HUD core function (symbology) The primary aim of the HUD sym - bology is to provide essential flight data and information needed for the safe and effective control of the aircraft. It is necessary for the symbology to accurately represent the outside (conformal) view, while not obstructing this outside view. The following items are unique to HUD symbology: Conformal display elements: Some HUD symbols are designed to overlay the real world as seen by the pilot through the HUD Combiner, Viewing position: The HUD is designed to be viewed from the cockpit Eye Reference Point and a head movement area around that point, called the Eye Motion Box, Viewing into the sun: The HUD is designed to be able to project symbology that can be seen against a very bright background (34000 Cd/m2). The pilots can use the dedicated sun-visor to reduce the intensity of the sun and can set the brightness of the symbology so that it can be seen (or use an automatic brightness feature). HUD in-flight symbology notes The HUD is not a substitute but an additional instrument to the existing avionics and needs to be integrated. The HUD integration in the cockpit is one of the key factors to achieve the operational objectives with a high consistency and efficient use. The FPV (Flight Path Vector) 27

Total FPA HUD core symbols: Piloting with the FPV and Total FPA Acceleration FPA To level off, forward stick input Total FPA Acceleration The core symbols of the HUD is the attitude/energy box, mainly composed of the: Aircraft attitude (pitch, roll, side-slip and heading), The FPV (Flight Path Vector) also commonly named bird, The Total FPA (Flight Path Angle), The speed delta (on the left side of the FPV). Aircraft is climbing chevrons above FPV, aircraft accelerates Aircraft is right of track Aircraft is at flying level and at constant speed Aircraft is on of track Aircraft is at flying level but still accelerating To stop accelerating, reduce thrust Aircraft is left of track The Flight Path Vector (FPV) indicates the actual aircraft s tra - jectory through the aircraft Flight Path Angle (FPA) as the longi - tudinal component and the aircraft drift angle as the lateral compo - nent. The Total FPA (or total energy chevrons ) indicates the actual total energy of the aircraft (poten - tial and kinetic). On top, it provi - des the acceleration/decelera tion status of the aircraft. The velocity vector FPV asso - ciated to the total energy (Total FPA) assist the pilot to control the speed and path stability during the approach. to the left to correct to the runway centerline track to the right to correct One of the other fundamental elements of the HUD is the confor - mal approach symbology which allows enhancement of the pilots situa tional awareness, by showing conformal trajectory related sym bols superimposed to the external scene. The angle between the LOC (Localizer) axis and the horizon indicates the lateral deviation of the aircraft s position with the runway centre line. Figure A Figure B Figure C Aircraft is below approach path Aircraft is on approach path Aircraft is above approach path The position of the Approach Reference Flight Path symbol versus the touchdown point, indi - cates the aircraft s vertical position versus its ideal approach path. beyond the touchdown point to correct to the touchdown point before the touchdown point to correct The symbo logy set described on the left, including the Primary Flight Display-like symbology (al - titude, speed scale, Flight Mode Annunciator, etc.) is the primary display mode of the HUD. 28 For all these figures, natural perspective rules apply.

Horizon line Aircraft current FPA Published approach descent path angle Pitch FPV Runway aiming point Approach reference flight path symbols LOC axis Some special symbology sets have been developed and are optimized so as the HUD adapts itself to the current flight phase and provides the associated display modes: Taxi (ground speed, acceleration cue, etc.), Take-Off (lateral raw data and guidance, tail strike limit for A380, etc.), Climb, cruise, descent for mainly weather avoidance windshear warning, TCAS RA (Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System Resolution Advisory) warning, etc., Approach (mainly composed of the here-above described symbology), Roll-Out (ground deceleration scale, etc.). Each display mode has various decluttered level functions of the flight phases, in order to favour see-through capability of the HUD. Operational benefits The HUD system improves the crews situational awareness (the - re fore contributing to safety) in providing: Situational information for the manual visual approaches and landings. With the display of the approach reference path marks, the HUD can replace airport aids such as the VASIS (Visual Approach Slope Indicator System) or PAPI (Precision Approach Path Indicator), enabling the pilot to precisely calibrate and follow a desired approach path without external aids. Enhanced stability of manually flown approaches (instrument and visual approaches) and the accuracy of the landing touchdown, by providing the velocity vector associated to the total energy in the HUD; this facilitates the pilots control of speed and path stability during the approach. An enhancement in flying seamlessly Instrument Meteorological Condition (IMC) to Visual Meteorological Condition (VMC), flying head-up. Enhanced pilot situational awareness when close to the ground by showing conformal trajectory related symbols superimposed to the external scene (aircraft trajectory in poor visibility as seen on the previous HUDs), Situational information for the monitoring of automatic approaches with Autoland (CAT II & CAT III approaches with Autoland and roll-out). Reversionary means for roll-out in the event of an untimely Autopilot disconnection or a failure of a system affecting automatic roll-out, following an automatic approach and landing, A wider field of view (35 x 26 ) in high crosswind conditions. Interpretation of the Approach Reference Flight Path symbols (corresponding to the figure A opposite page) 29

Retrofit installation on an A340-600 flight test aircraft In addition to these improvements, the HUD system also brings some operational credits, such as: The lateral guidance information for take-off roll, in low visibility (certified on the A320 Family, on-going development for the A380). As with the Para-Visual Indicator (PVI), the lower takeoff minima can be reduced from a 125m Runway Visual Range (RVR) for EASA (500ft. for FAA) to a 75 meters RVR for EASA (300ft. for FAA), thanks to this lateral guidance information. The HUD is eligible in approach, for reduction of CAT 1 Approach minima, down to CAT II Approach minima (conducted with Auto-Pilot engaged) on Type 1 airport installations as per FAA Order 8400.13B or EASA NPA OPS- 41. This operational benefit requires an operational approval from the operator s airworthiness authority. In regards to the operational feedback (Entry-Into-Service in 2009), the customers with aircraft equipped with HUD highlighted the following: Final approach trajectory (through the control system with the HUD approach symbols) very clear and appreciated (exact flight path of the aircraft), Reference mark of the runway slope (conformal approach symbols) very helpful, Ground deceleration scale to monitor Autobrake action or control manual braking during roll-out done with ease, During taxi, the indication of the ground speed and the energy chevrons (Total FPA), highly appreciated. The HUD installation is retro fita ble. The retrofit conditions have to be defined and agreed by the invol ved aircraft programme. 30 Pitch/roll adjustment tool for HUD installation Conclusion The Head-Up Display (HUD) contributes significantly to increasing the pilot situational awareness, particularly during the approach and landing phases by showing trajectory related symbols superimposed on the pilot s actual external view. The experience in service confirmed that the HUD is a very good means to stabilize the aircraft during the approach phase, assuming that the flight crews follow a dedicated HUD training. The HUD system also offers enhancement with a video image support. Indeed, the fully digital processing allows the HUD to CONTACT DETAILS Eric ALBERT HUD Project Leader Airbus Cockpit Engineering Tel: +33 (0)5 61 18 16 01 Fax: +33 (0)5 61 93 63 82 eric.albert@airbus.com display the video image as well as the symbols without any constraints (particularly on graphic capability and flexibility which are not time constraining). The HUD is designed to support future technologies such as the EVS (Enhanced Video System), SVS (Synthetic Vision System) or SGS (Surface Guidance System) that will enhance surface operations and obstacle awareness. Thanks to HUD capabilities, these future growing evolutions will reinforce the enhancement of flight safety on all Airbus aircraft models.