CARBON FOOTPRINT REPORT

Similar documents
Specification of fibre raw material. For the documentation of fibre raw material:

Nordic Ecolabelling of Paper Products - Basic Module

The Economic Risks of Reducing the U.S. Electricity Supply CO, Control and the U.S. Electricity Sector

Nordic Ecolabelling of Copy and printing paper - supplementary module

CONTRIBUTION OF INTERNAL AUDITING IN THE VALUE OF A NURSING UNIT WITHIN THREE YEARS

Energy Performance Certificate

Managing Corporate Travel GHG Emissions An eco-sustainable business travel management framework

POLAND S GREENHOUSE GA S EMISSIONS

Greenhouse Gas Protocol Report for IT Mästaren. Assessment Period: Produced on June 10, 2014 by Our Impacts on behalf of U&W

Learning from evaluations Processes and instruments used by GIZ as a learning organisation and their contribution to interorganisational learning

LADDER SAFETY Table of Contents

Climate Review Group Environmental Management

How To Deiver Resuts

CERTIFICATE COURSE ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABILITY. Course Offered By: Indian Environmental Society

ICAP CREDIT RISK SERVICES. Your Business Partner

Capability Development Grant. Build business capabilities to sharpen your competitive edge

Certified Once Accepted Everywhere Why use an accredited certification body?

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE REGION OF PEEL A GUIDE FOR NEW AND CURRENT VENDORS

Prudential plc. Basis of Reporting: GHG emissions data and other environmental metrics.

SELECTING THE SUITABLE ERP SYSTEM: A FUZZY AHP APPROACH. Ufuk Cebeci

How one simple step can halve a carbon footprint

CUSTOM. Putting Your Benefits to Work. COMMUNICATIONS. Employee Communications Benefits Administration Benefits Outsourcing

Australian Bureau of Statistics Management of Business Providers

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Criteria

Scope 1 describes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that are owned by or under the direct control of the reporting entity;

Statement of Carbon Neutrality 2012

Chapter 2 Developing a Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy

Degree Programs in Environmental Science/Studies

Carbon Footprint Report

Sample Scope 3 GHG Inventory Reporting Template

A Guide to Environmental Auditing of Hydropower Projects

ECCM 2008 Calculations Steffie Broer - Trip to Austria - Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment

The width of single glazing. The warmth of double glazing.


Fact sheet. Conversion factors. Energy and carbon conversions 2011 update

Face Hallucination and Recognition

Gas turbine air intake media

professional indemnity insurance proposal form

Internal Control. Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol

Setting up the Forensic Laboratory

Protection Against Income Loss During the First 4 Months of Illness or Injury *

Delhi Business Review X Vol. 14, No. 1 (January - June 2013)

Value For Money in public sector corporate services. A joint project by the UK Public Sector Audit Agencies

Greenhouse gas emissions from direct combustion of various fuels (e.g. grain dryer)

Secure Network Coding with a Cost Criterion

The Use of Cooling-Factor Curves for Coordinating Fuses and Reclosers

Asset Management Strategy Customers, at the heart of what we do

A PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: A CASE STUDY OF HEALTH CENTERS

NEW ZEALAND. Submission to the ADP. New Zealand s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution. 7 July 2015

The Contribution of Global Agriculture to Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Welcome to Colonial Voluntary Benefits. Thank you for your interest in our Universal Life with the Accelerated Death Benefit for Long Term Care Rider.

l l ll l l Exploding the Myths about DETC Accreditation A Primer for Students

SAP Business Analytics. Services & Solutions for the Metals and Mining Industry

A Supplier Evaluation System for Automotive Industry According To Iso/Ts Requirements

Submission by Norway to the ADP

Incident management system for the oil and gas industry. Good practice guidelines for incident management and emergency response personnel

Oracle Project Financial Planning. User's Guide Release

World Accreditation Day

Scope 2 Accounting Guidance: What it means for corporate decisions to purchase environmental instruments

Strengthening Human Resources Information Systems: Experiences from Bihar and Jharkhand, India

Itella s principles of environmental accounting

Scope 1 describes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that are owned by or under the direct control of the reporting entity;

A World Class Approach to Process Safety

APIS Software Training /Consulting

Summary: Apollo Group Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Worldwide)

Corporate Carbon Neutral Plan

Subject: Corns of En gineers and Bureau of Reclamation: Information on Potential Budgetarv Reductions for Fiscal Year 1998

Remanufactured OEM Toner Cartridges

Translink Carbon Report 2011/12

Overview of Health and Safety in China

Tax Measures:

COASTLINE GROUP HUMAN RESOURCES STRATEGY Great homes, great services, great people.

Guidance on how to measure and report your greenhouse gas emissions

Best Management. Guidance Manual. Practices (BMP) for Developing

Strategic Plan

RAVE NOTICES FOR OUR CEO AND PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT

Transcription:

CARBON FOOTPRINT REPORT 07.03.2012 ATEA ASA REPORT: CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS 2011 PROVIDED BY: CO2FOCUS

Content Introduction... 2 Method... 2 Resuts... 4 Atea Group... 4 Atea Norway... 5 Atea Denmark... 7 Atea Sweden... 8 Atea Logistics... 9 Atea Finand... 10 Atea The Batics... 11 Concusions... 12 Reference... 12 Appendix 1... 13 Appendix 2... 14 Page 1

Carbon Footprint report A T E A 2 0 1 0 Introduction Environmenta focus is an integrated part of Atea s business strategy towards customers and within their own organization. The aim of this report is to get an overview of Atea s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to faciitate the identification of concrete measures in order to reduce their energy consumption and own GHG emissions. Data from a the companies has been coected and invove the commitment from empoyees from various group eves. The carbon footprint report for 2011 incudes a of Atea s operations in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finand and the Batics. Method The carbon footprint gives a genera overview of the company's greenhouse gas emissions, converted into CO 2 equivaents and it is based on reported data from interna and externa systems. The anaysis faciitates the identification of possibe measures to reduce the energy consumption and thus aso the overa carbon footprint. The purposes of the carbon indicators are to measure the carbon intensity per empoyee and per vaue creation, in addition to showing environmenta transparency towards externa stakehoders. The anaysis is based on the internationa methodoogy Greenhouse Gas Protoco Initiative (GHG protoco). The GHGprotoco is the most important standard for measuring greenhouse gas emissions, deveoped by Word Resources Institute (WRI) and Word Business Counci for Sustainabe Deveopment (WBCSD). The report considers the foowing greenhouse gases, a converted into CO 2 equivaents: CO 2, CH 4 (methane), N 2 O (aughing gas), SF 6, HFCs and PFCs. Scope 1: Direct emissions (mandatory reporting) This eve concerns a emissions from sources owned or controed by the company. For Atea Group, scope 1 incudes: A direct emissions from the Atea Group s owned or controed sources, such as company vehices, and heat generation (fue oi and natura gas for heating). Scope 2: Indirect emissions (mandatory reporting) This eve concerns a emissions from purchased energy. In the case of Atea Group, this means purchased eectricity and district heating. The eectricity CO 2 emission factor is cacuated from the Nordic eectricity production mix, which is the emission factor used for Norway, Sweden and Finand. The emission factor for Denmark is given by Energinet. For the Batics, statistics from the Internationa Energy Agency has been used. Renewabe energy is incuded in the CO 2 emission factor for eectricity; for that reason the purchase of green energy does not change the eectricity emission factor. The emission factor used to cacuate district heating was provided by the district heating operator, and statistics from the Internationa Energy Agency. Page 2

Scope 3: Indirect emissions (vountary reporting) Scope 3 incudes other indirect emissions from company activities originating from sources not controed by the company such as, emissions from subsuppiers, services and waste management. Whie scope 1 and 2 are mandatory according to the GHG Protoco, cacuating scope 3 emissions in the Carbon Footprint Anaysis is optiona. The Atea Group report incudes air trave and waste management. Air trave is reported in number of fights to a predefined region; some companies have a better overview and are abe to report on the actua distance trave. The air trave is then converted to trave kiometers. The historica data has been review and readjust from trave hours to trave kiometers, the purpose is to give a more accurate resut for ATEA Group independent on how air trave is reported. The 9 % upift factor is added to the distances to take into account the nondirect routes and deays/circing. The amount of recyced waste generates zero emission in this context. Recyced gass has a cimate impact, which is much ower than if it had not been recyced. Page 3

Resuts The resuts are presented by country for Atea s operation in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Atea Logistics and the Batics. Atea Group TABLE 1 KEY FIGURES ATEA GROUP Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro E85 Diese BioCNG Autogas vehices Fue oi Natura gas 1 427 528 9 778 345 1 142 12 192 5 671 10 562 m3 13 033,3 0,1 7 752,3 15,1 80,5 55,5 105,6 3 300,0 0,0 1 972,5 1,1 18,7 14,4 21,3 29 % 17 % Sum scope 1 21 042,4 MWh 5 328,1 46 % Eectricity District heating 21 334 438 5 857 640 21 334,4 5 857,6 4 187,6 576,6 36 % 5 % Sum scope 2 27 192,1 MWh 4 764,2 41 % Air trave Genera waste Paper Gass Meta Pastic Organic waste 9 023 204 772 546 541 634 2 615 789 35 203 62 295 pkm 1 247,9 208,6 0,1 11 % 2 % EEwaste 270 387 Energy wood 5 163 Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 48 234,5 MWh 1 456,5 11 548,8 13 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. FIGURE 1 ATEA GROUP CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME tco 2 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 Atea Group 2 000 1 000 Transport and fossi fue 4 287 5 578 4 639 4 176 5 328 Eectricity and district heating 4 486 4 367 4 514 4 745 4 764 Air trave and waste 1 545 1 057 1 031 1 178 1 456 Page 4

TABLE 2 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA GROUP Atea Goup 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 10 027 10 807 9 976 10 098 11 549 15,2 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 37 469 40 180 41 293 40 895 48 235 28,7 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 240 193 241 237 220 8,3 % CO2 emissions per empoyee ( / empoyee) 2,5 2,4 2,3 2,1 2,3 9,8 % CO2 emissions per revenue ( / miion NOK) 0,7 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,6 14,9 % Atea Norway TABLE 3 KEY FIGURES ATEA NORWAY Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro E85 Diese Fue oi / kerosene 189 930 9 210 385 5 671 1 734,1 0,1 2 095,4 55,5 439,1 0,0 533,2 14,4 18 % 22 % 1 % Sum scope 1 3 885,1 MWh 986,6 4 Eectricity District heating 8 697 960 861 409 8 698,0 861,4 861,1 83,0 35 % 3 % Sum scope 2 9 559,4 MWh 944,1 38 % Air trave Genera waste Paper Gass Meta Pastic Organic waste 3 919 144 71 232 76 494 875 197 4 707 36 715 pkm 510,6 19,2 0,0 21 % 1 % EEwaste 91 915 Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 13 444,4 MWh 529,9 2 460,7 22 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. Page 5

tco2 Carbon Footprint report FIGURE 2 ATEA NORWAY CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME 1 200 Atea Norway 1 000 800 600 400 200 Transport and fossi fue 439 416 537 498 987 Eectricity and district heating 544 579 711 735 944 Air trave 400 322 374 396 530 TABLE 4 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA NORWAY Norway Atea Norge AS 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 1 383 1 317 1 623 1 629 2 461 77,9 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 6 720 7 172 9 299 9 303 13 444 100,1 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 278 278 359 371 295 6,1 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,8 1,4 1,8 1,7 1,8 1,2 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,4 0,4 1,7 % Page 6

Atea Denmark TABLE 5 KEY FIGURES ATEA DENMARK Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro Diese 664 357 68 312 6 065,6 680,4 1 535,8 173,1 33 % 4 % Sum scope 1 6 746,0 MWh 1 708,9 36 % Eectricity District heating 5 819 454 2 270 496 5 819,5 2 270,5 2 647,9 235,7 56 % 5 % Sum scope 2 8 090,0 MWh 2 883,5 61 % Air trave Genera waste Paper Gass Meta Pastic Organic waste 235 048 327 178 62 860 1 740 580 5 625 25 580 pkm 30,6 88,3 0,1 1 % 2 % Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 14 835,9 MWh 119,0 4 711,5 3 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. FIGURE 3 ATEA DENMARK CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME tco 2 3 500 3 000 2 500 2 000 Atea Denmark 1 500 1 000 500 Transport and fossi fue 1 647 2 044 1 701 1 611 1 709 Eectricity and district heating 3 000 2 916 2 932 3 011 2 884 Air trave 273 313 142 126 119 TABLE 6 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA DENMARK Denmark Atea A/S 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 4 920 5 274 4 775 4 748 4 711 4,2 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 13 906 15 215 13 817 13 682 14 836 6,7 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 275 213 213 210 210 23,6 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 4,1 3,8 3,6 3,4 3,4 18,5 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 1,1 1,0 0,9 0,9 0,8 22,7 % Page 7

Atea Sweden TABLE 7 KEY FIGURES ATEA SWEDEN Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro Diese 373 386 261 278 3 409,0 2 602,3 863,2 662,1 34 % 26 % Sum scope 1 6 011,3 MWh 1 525,3 6 Eectricity District heating 3 418 624 1 009 468 3 418,6 1 009,5 338,4 74,5 13 % 3 % Sum scope 2 4 428,1 MWh 412,9 16 % Air trave Genera waste Paper 3 637 597 216 190 83 150 pkm 543,4 58,4 21 % 2 % Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 10 439,4 MWh 601,8 2 540,0 24 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. FIGURE 4 ATEA SWEDEN CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME tco 2 1 800 1 600 1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 Atea Sweden Transport and fossi fue 1 059 1 601 1 055 828 1 525 Eectricity and district heating 367 282 389 481 413 Air trave 721 299 401 507 602 TABLE 8 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA SWEDEN Sweden Atea Sverige AB 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 2 147 2 147 1 775 1 816 2 540 18,3 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 7 485 8 898 8 185 8 209 10 439 39,5 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 215 169 243 219 169 21,4 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,8 2,5 1,4 1,3 1,5 16,3 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,5 0,6 0,4 0,4 0,4 25,2 % Page 8

Atea Logistics TABLE 9 KEY FIGURES ATEA LOGISTICS Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro Diese Autogas vehices 4 525 4 247 1 142 41,3 42,3 15,1 10,5 10,8 1,1 4 % 4 % Sum scope 1 98,8 MWh 22,4 9 % Eectricity District heating 1 438 478 915 000 1 438,5 915,0 142,4 47,6 58 % 19 % Sum scope 2 2 353,5 MWh 190,0 77 % Air trave Genera waste Paper Meta Pastic 111 818 78 000 251 960 154 025 17 480 pkm 11,8 21,1 5 % 9 % Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 2 452,2 MWh 32,9 245,2 13 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. FIGURE 5 ATEA LOGISTICS CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME tco 2 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Atea Logistics Transport and fossi fue 7 25 22 20 22 Eectricity and district heating 149 138 139 189 190 Air trave 36 13 7 15 33 TABLE 10 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA LOGISTICS Sweden Atea Logistics AB 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 192 176 168 224 245 27,6 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 2 263 2 359 2 384 2 433 2 452 8,4 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 161 163 171 168 168 4,2 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,0 0,8 1,1 1,5 1,5 49, CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 10,5 % Page 9

Atea Finand TABLE 11 KEY FIGURES ATEA FINLAND Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro Diese 100 659 82 189 919,0 818,6 232,7 208,3 27 % 25 % Sum scope 1 1 737,6 MWh 441,0 52 % Eectricity District heating 1 426 508 478 287 1 426,5 478,3 141,2 122,9 17 % 14 % Sum scope 2 1 904,8 MWh 264,1 31 % Air trave Genera waste Paper EEwaste Pastic Energy wood 985 615 29 240 24 410 23 468 940 3 680 pkm 136,3 7,9 16 % 1 % Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 3 642,4 MWh 144,2 849,2 17 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. FIGURE 6 ATEA FINLAND CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME. tco 2 900 800 700 600 500 Atea Finand 400 300 200 100 Transport and fossi fue 635 764 697 594 441 Eectricity and district heating 284 310 283 262 264 Air trave 69 94 86 119 144 TABLE 12 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA FINLAND Finand Atea Finand Oy 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 988 1 169 1 066 974 849 14, Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 4 390 5 151 4 728 4 105 3 642 17, Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 257 270 250 236 239 7, CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 3,6 3,9 3,0 3,2 2,5 29,1 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,7 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 27,3 % Page 10

Atea The Batics TABLE 13 KEY FIGURES ATEA THE BALTICS Category Consumption Energy eq. (MWh) 1 Emissions ( ) Percentage Petro Diese Autogas vehices Natura gas 94 671 151 933 12 192 10 562 m3 864,3 1 513,3 80,5 105,6 218,8 385,0 18,7 21,3 29 % 52 % 3 % 3 % Sum scope 1 2 563,7 MWh 643,9 87 % Eectricity District heating 533 414 322 980 533,4 323,0 56,6 12,9 8 % 2 % Sum scope 2 856,4 MWh 69,5 9 % Air trave Genera waste Paper Meta Pastic Organic waste 133 982 50 706 42 760 12 6 451 1 483 pkm 15,2 13,7 2 % 2 % Sum scope 3 Tota corporate CO 2 emissions 3 420,1 MWh 28,9 742,3 4 % 10 1) Energy equivaent is cacuated for the corporate main operations (scope 1 and 2) to show the yeary energy intensity reated to the corporate daiy activities. FIGURE 7 ATEA THE BALTICS CO 2 EMISSIONS PER SCOPE OVER TIME. tco 2 800 700 600 500 400 Atea The Batics 300 200 100 Transport and fossi fue 500 728 626 625 644 Eectricity and district heating 142 140 60 66 70 Air trave and waste 47 15 21 15 29 TABLE 14 ENERGY AND CARBON INDICATORS ATEA THE BALTICS The Batics Atea UAB 07/11 Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 689 883 706 707 742 7,7 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 2 687 3 482 3 039 3 162 3 420 27,3 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 158 148 152 187 193 21,7 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,7 2,3 2,5 2,1 2,2 29,2 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 1,2 1,9 2,4 1,8 1,7 38,1 % Page 11

Concusions This report is part of Ateas cimate strategy to reduce its GHG emissions. The main contributors to Atea Group greenhouse gas emissions are eectricity/district heating and fossi fues; this is aso the case for the operations in each country. Fossi fue is the main contributor of emissions in Sweden, Norway and Finand, whie eectricity/district heating is the main contributor to the carbon footprint of Norway, Denmark, Atea Logistics and the Batics. In some of the premises in Denmark natura gas has been repaced with district heating. District heating not ony provide higher efficiency but it aso owers their carbon footprint. Atea Group have since 2007 increased their tota CO 2 emissions by 12 %. This is the resut of acquisitions and expansion since 2007. The nature of the new acquisitions has a huge impact in the carbon footprint. In Norway as a resut of an acquisition the transport activities increased and the emissions from transport and fossi fue amost doube. Atea evauates its cimate efforts by comparing the carbon emissions per empoyee and have a reduction target of 25% CO 2 emissions per empoyee by 2015 compared with 2007 figures. Atea is more than hafway in their target period and have so far managed to reduce their emissions per empoyee with 10% since 2007. This reduction is argey due to impemented action pans that are integrated in the environmenta management system ISO 14001. The resuts show that the progress to reach the reduction target varies within the organization. Reference Method Word Resource Institute & Word Business Counci for Sustainabe Deveopment; The Greenhouse Gas Protoco: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) Scope 1 Fossi fue Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rura Affairs Scope 2 Eectricity and district heating Norde statistics for Nordic eectricity production, Energinet.dk, Internationa Energy Agency. Scope 3 Air trave and waste Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rura Affairs Waste Management Norway Page 12

Appendix 1 Key Figures 2 007 2 008 2 009 2 010 2 011 07/11 Atea Group 10 318 11 001 10 184 10 098 11 549 12 % Transport and fossi fue 4 287 5 578 4 639 4 176 5 328 24 % Eectricity and district heating 4 486 4 367 4 514 4 745 4 764 6 % Air trave 1 266 889 905 997 1 248 1 % Waste 278 168 126 181 209 25 % Norway Atea Norge AS 1 383 1 317 1 623 1 629 2 461 78 % Transport and fossi fue 439 416 537 498 987 125 % Eectricity and district heating 544 579 711 735 944 74 % Air trave 383 311 360 386 511 33 % Waste 17 11 14 10 19 12 % Denmark Atea A/S 4 920 5 274 4 775 4 748 4 711 4 % Transport and fossi fue 1 647 2 044 1 701 1 611 1 709 4 % Eectricity and district heating 3 000 2 916 2 932 3 011 2 884 4 % Air trave 107 218 93 37 31 71 % Waste 166 95 50 89 88 47 % Sweden Atea Sverige AB 2 147 2 182 1 846 1 816 2 540 15 % Transport and fossi fue 1 059 1 601 1 055 828 1 525 44 % Eectricity and district heating 367 282 389 481 413 13 % Air trave 676 256 352 447 543 2 Waste 45 43 49 59 58 29 % Sweden Atea Logistics AB 192 176 168 224 245 28 % Transport and fossi fue 7 25 22 20 22 22 Eectricity and district heating 149 138 139 189 190 27 % Air trave 26 6 5 5 12 55 % Waste 10 7 2 10 21 12 Finand Atea Finand Oy 988 1 169 1 066 974 849 14 % Transport and fossi fue 635 764 697 594 441 31 % Eectricity and district heating 284 310 283 262 264 7 % Air trave 61 85 78 111 136 125 % Waste 8 9 8 8 8 4 % The Batics Atea UAB 689 883 706 707 742 8 % Transport and fossi fue 500 728 626 625 644 29 % Eectricity and district heating 142 140 60 66 70 51 % Air trave 14 12 18 10 15 6 % Waste 33 3 3 5 14 58 % Page 13

Appendix 2 Carbon Indicators Companies energy and carbon indicators 07/11 Atea Goup Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 10 027 10 807 9 976 10 098 11 549 15,2 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 37 469 40 180 41 293 40 895 48 235 28,7 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 240 193 241 237 220 8,3 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 2,5 2,4 2,3 2,1 2,3 9,8 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,7 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,6 14,9 % Norway Atea Norge AS Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 1 383 1 317 1 623 1 629 2 461 77,9 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 6 720 7 172 9 299 9 303 13 444 100,1 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 278 278 359 371 295 6,1 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,8 1,4 1,8 1,7 1,8 1,2 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,4 0,4 1,7 % Denmark Atea A/S Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 4 920 5 274 4 775 4 748 4 711 4,2 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 13 906 15 215 13 817 13 682 14 836 6,7 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 275 213 213 210 210 23,6 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 4,1 3,8 3,6 3,4 3,4 18,5 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 1,1 1,0 0,9 0,9 0,8 22,7 % Sweden Atea Sverige AB Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 2 147 2 147 1 775 1 816 2 540 18,3 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 7 485 8 898 8 185 8 209 10 439 39,5 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 215 169 243 219 169 21,4 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,8 2,5 1,4 1,3 1,5 16,3 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,5 0,6 0,4 0,4 0,4 25,2 % Sweden Atea Logistics AB Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 192 176 168 224 245 27,6 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 2 263 2 359 2 384 2 433 2 452 8,4 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 161 163 171 168 168 4,2 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,0 0,8 1,1 1,5 1,5 49, CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 10,5 % Finand Atea Finand Oy Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 988 1 169 1 066 974 849 14, Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 4 390 5 151 4 728 4 105 3 642 17, Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 257 270 250 236 239 7, CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 3,6 3,9 3,0 3,2 2,5 29,1 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 0,7 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 27,3 % The Batics Atea UAB Tota corporate CO2 emissions: 689 883 706 707 742 7,7 % Tota energy consumption scope 1 and 2 (MWh): 2 687 3 482 3 039 3 162 3 420 27,3 % Energy consumption per square metre ( / m2) 158 148 152 187 193 21,7 % CO2 emissions per empoyee (tonnes CO2 / empoyee) 1,7 2,3 2,5 2,1 2,2 29,2 % CO2 emissions per revenue (tonnes CO2 / miion NOK) 1,2 1,9 2,4 1,8 1,7 38,1 % Page 14