Clean Energy Systems, Inc.



Similar documents
Making Coal Use Compatible with Measures to Counter Global Warming

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

The Future of Coal-Based Power Generation With CCS UN CCS Summit James Katzer MIT Energy Initiative web.mit.edu/coal/

How To Make A Coal Gasification Combined Cycle

Communicating Your Commitment: Your Guide to Clean Energy Messaging

Appendix 5A: Natural Gas Use in Industrial Boilers

Putting a chill on global warming

High temperature electrolysis (SOEC) for the production of renewable fuels

How To Evaluate Cogeneration

CLEAN TECHNOLOGY FUND CRITERIA FOR FINANCING LOW-CARBON OPPORTUNITIES IN COAL AND GAS POWER INVESTMENTS

Biomass Conversion to Electricity: Stand Alone Power Plants, Co-Generation,

ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN POWER PLANTS

The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on. Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

How To Power A Coal Plant With Electricity From A Gasifier

What Coal Technologies Can Do to Reduce Global CO2 Emission

Renewable Choice Energy

Levelized Cost of New Electricity Generating Technologies

The Next Generation Near-Zero Emission Natural Gas Vehicles

Hybrid Power Generations Systems, LLC

Morris Argyle Assistant Professor Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. School of Energy Resources Symposium Casper, WY February 28, 2007

Source: EIA Natural Gas Issues and Trends 1998

SIEMENS technologies compatible with environmental requirements like reduction of CO 2 emissions. ISBF conference. Bratislava, 9-10 February 2009

C S L Forum. 2nd Ministerial Meeting. ITALIAN ROADMAP: Project s Proposal for CSLF

Financing New Coal-Fired Power Plants

Good Practice Form

Alberta Research Council (ARC) Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM) Recovery Project in Alberta, Canada

BIOMASS LOOKING FOR EFFICIENT UTILIZATION THE REHEAT CONCEPT. Jaroslav Lahoda Olaf Arndt Walter Hanstein. Siemens Power Generation (PG)

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

Siemens Gas Turbines over 100 MW

Design and Test Operation Performance of 1,500 C Class Gas Turbine Combined-Cycle Power Plant:

Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

A Discussion of PEM Fuel Cell Systems and Distributed Generation

97 MW of Cat coal seam methane power in New South Wales, Australia

GENERATION TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Gas: the right choice for heating in Europe

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Siemens Power Generation Innovationstrends bei Anlagen und Komponenten in der Energieerzeugung

Biggest Challenge for the Hydrogen Economy Hydrogen Production & Infrastructure Costs. Presentation Overview

Praxair, Inc. Ray Roberge Sr. VP and Chief Technology Officer

Alstom Development of Oxyfuel PC and CFB Power Plants

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

Sixth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration

La caldaia a letto fluido circolante per la riduzione delle emissioni di CO2

The Law and Economics of CO 2 as a Pollutant and Commodity

Zero Emission Engine. An Economic and Environmental Benefit

PUTTING CARBON BACK INTO THE GROUND

INDEX GENERAL

Enhanced power and heat generation from biomass and municipal waste. Torsten Strand. Siemens Power Generation Industrial Applications

Facts on CO 2 Capture and Storage

V. ENERGY SAVINGS IN INDUSTRY

Fuel Gas CO2 Recovery Utilization, Disposal, and Business Development

The Technology and Business of Power Andrew Valencia, P.E. Lower Colorado River Authority

ENERGY SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS AND ENERGY SAVINGS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NGCC AND COAL-FIRED STEAM POWER PLANTS WITH INTEGRATED CCS AND ORC SYSTEMS

Implications of Abundant Natural Gas

Gas-Fired Power HIGHLIGHTS

COMBUSTION. In order to operate a heat engine we need a hot source together with a cold sink

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

MHI s Energy Efficient Flue Gas CO 2 Capture Technology and Large Scale CCS Demonstration Test at Coal-fired Power Plants in USA

Industrial Oxygen: Its Generation and Use

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

UNITED STATES SUBMISSION TO THE WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE STUDY

How to Earn the LEED Green Power Credit

Geothermal: The Clean Energy Secret May 7, 2008

BIOENERGY (FROM NORWEGIAN FORESTS) GOOD OR BAD FOR THE CLIMATE?

Balance of Fuel Cell Power Plant (BOP)

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

DELIVERING THE BIOENERGY TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE TO THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY

LANDFILL GAS TO ENERGY- COMBINED ENGINE AND ORC-PROCESS

Comparison of Recent Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in Japan, U.K., Germany and France

CCS in the Oil refining Industry System Solutions and Assessment of Capture Potential

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

Geologic Carbon Capture and Storage Sean I. Plasynski a ; John T. Litynski b ; Timothy R. Carr c ; Howard G. McIlvried d ; Rameshwar D.

COMBUSTION STUDIES OF NATURAL GAS AND SYN-GAS WITH HUMID AIR

Dr. István ZÁDOR PhD: Rita MARKOVITS-SOMOGYI: Dr. Ádám TÖRÖK PhD: PhD, MSc in Transportation Engineering, KOGÁT Ltd.

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Availability of fossil fuels

Process Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion with Oxygen Uncoupling in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

How To Run A Power Plant

Annex 5A Trends in international carbon dioxide emissions

S 0417 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

COGENERATION. This section briefly describes the main features of the cogeneration system or a Combined Heat & Power (CHP) system. 36 Units.

Electricity Use and Production Patterns

PAMUN XV ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE PROMOTING THE MOVEMENT TOWARDS RENEWABLE RESOURCES OF ENERGY

Review of Potential Efficiency Improvements at Coal-Fired Power Plants

Thermo Conversions Gasification (TCG) Technology

COAL GASIFICATION AND CO 2 CAPTURE

CAT CG132. Series Gas Generator Sets

Emissions Comparison for a 20 MW Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Power Plant

CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery

Australian Activities in Clean Hydrogen from Coal & Natural Gas. Dr John K Wright Director CSIRO Energy Transformed Flagship Program

Issue. September 2012

ANALYSIS OF THE ADMINISTRATION S PROPOSED TAX INCENTIVES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND THE ENVIRONMENT

Biogas as transportation fuel

IGCC Technology Overview & Genoa Site Feasibility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Transcription:

Clean Energy Systems, Inc. Clean Energy Systems (CES) technology is a zero emission, oxy-fuel combustion power plant. CES approach has been to apply gas generators and high-temperature, high-pressure, turbines from aerospace applications to power generation. The CES oxy-fuel combustion uses oxygen instead of air to combust gaseous fuels. Because air is excluded from the combustion process, the products of combustion are nearly pure CO2 and water. Thus, the CO2 can be easily isolated simply by cooling the flue gases. The efficiencies of the initial power plants will be approximately 30% and will improve to approximately 60% as new turbine designs, that can capture the benefits of the high temperature gas stream, are introduced. The primary opportunities relate to the fact that the technology is zero emission and the CO2 production can be sequestered. Thus far, CES developed and demonstrated a 500 kw gas generator and a 5MW power plant. SoCalGas RD&D Investment in CES SoCalGas is supporting Clean Energy Systems (CES) through its regulated RD&D program. CES oxy-fuel power system is superior to other CO2 capture technologies because it avoids the emission of other criteria pollutants such as NOx and particulates, and it has the potential to be more efficient than today s most advanced combined cycle power plants once steam turbines that can handle 3000 F steam become commercially available. The growing concerns about GHG emissions has created a market zero emission power technologies in California and internationally. CES gas generator is an enabling technology with a variety of applications including: enhanced oil and gas recovery, cost-effective 1 pollution-free power production, LNG-receiving terminal cogeneration, fuel diversity and many other niche markets. Perhaps the biggest challenge to the CES technologies is to improve the cycle efficiency and to work with others to develop steam turbine technology capable of cost effectively operating at very high temperatures. Clean Energy Systems Technology Overview The basic CES zero-emission fossil fuel power plant design is shown in Figure 1. The core of CES process is an oxy-combustor or gas generator adapted from rocket engine technology shown in Figure 2. The gas generator burns gaseous fuel with oxygen in the presence of water to produce a steam/co 2 mixture at extremely high temperature and pressures. If uncontrolled, the 1 The CES system represents the most cost-effective method for capturing power plant CO2 emissions available today. 1

combustion temperatures could reach 6000 F, causing the gas generator to melt. Water is injected into the combustion process reducing the steam temperature to 3200 F or less. The steam/co2 combustion products are then used to power steam turbines. Thus, the CES power system produces essentially pure water and sequestration ready CO2. Typical fuels include natural gas, syngas from coal, landfill gas and biogases. The CES process can also use inexpensive aqueous fuels such as emulsified refinery residues and glycerin N 2 Air Air Separation Plant O 2 Gas Generator RH * CH 4, CO, H 2, etc. HP IP LP Elect Gen. Crude Fuel Fuel Processing Plant Fuel* Recycle Water Multi-stage Turbines HX Coal, Refinery Residues, or Biomass Direct Sales CO 2 Recovery CO 2 Cond. C.W. NG, Oil or Landfill Gas EOR, ECBM, or Sequestration Figure 1: The CES Process Excess Water from bio-diesel production. The CES gas generator can be started up quickly and can achieve full power in less than ten minutes. It also has excellent load following capabilities and CES believes the system can be used in peak power applications. Every component in the CES process, except for the gas generator, is commercially proven and standard in power generation. Figure 3 is a picture of a 5 MW gas generator located at the CES test site in Kimberlina, CA. 2

Figure 2: The CES Gas Generator Figure 3: 5MW CES Gas Generator 3

Oxy-fuel Combustion Power Plants Potential Efficiency The CES oxy-fuel cycle produces large volumes of ultra-super critical steam and CO2 by combusting gaseous fuels with pure oxygen in the presence of water. Water is also used to cool the walls of the combustion chamber and to reduce the combustion gases to as low as 1200 F -- the upper temperature limit of today s steam turbine blades. In the current configuration the efficiency is about 30%. The potential exists to achieve efficiency levels approaching 60%, including the energy required by the oxygen plant, provided that steam turbines capable of tolerating temperatures in excess of 3,000 F become available. Development and Testing To date CES has focused on securing the intellectual property rights and on developing and demonstrating the first commercial oxy-fueled gas generator. Significant milestones have included: In 2000, CES successfully completed proof of concept testing with a 110 kw prototype, funded in part by the state of California. CES has fabricated a 10 MW gas generator, funded in part ($2.5 million) by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Testing was successfully completed in February 2003. In 2002, the CEC awarded CES $4 million in funding to design and build a demonstration plant using its oxy-fuel technology as part of an $8 million project. Mirant and Air Liquide were participants. This effort was successfully completed in 2006. In August 2003, CES acquired a 5 MW idle biomass plant, which has been re-powered as a multi-fuel zero emission plant. Initial oxy-fueled tests have been conducted with natural gas. Simulated coal syngas, landfill gas, hydrogen and glycerin are currently being tested. The first synchronization to the grid occurred in February 2005, and more than 1300 hours and 300 starts have been logged. In September 2005, DOE initiated two projects aimed at achieving high temperature, high efficiency turbines and combustors for oxy-fuel power systems. The award announcement states that these technologies must be conducive to 100 percent separation and capture of CO2 and must achieve long-term power system efficiencies of 50 60 percent: Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation will combine current steam and gas turbine technologies to design an optimized turbine that uses oxygen with coal-derived fuels in the combustion process. In this break-through project, system studies will show how this new 4

turbine can be integrated into a highly efficient, near-zero-emission power plant. (DOE award: $14.5 million; project duration: 56 months). Clean Energy Systems will develop and demonstrate new combustor technology powered by coal syngas and oxygen. The project team will evaluate and redesign the combustion sequence to achieve the ideal ratio of oxygen to fuel, a critical parameter in achieving optimum combustion and reducing costs. (DOE award: $4.5 million; project duration: 39 months) In addition to DOE funding, Siemens is investing its own resources to advance steam turbine technology in the following areas: Building upon ultra supercritical steam turbine technology (increasing working fluid temperature up to 3200 F) CO2 sequestration Making step advancements to attain large plant (300 600 MW) efficiencies above 50% by 2015 (HHV, coal-to-grid basis) Siemens expects these advanced turbines are expected to become available in the 2012-2017 time frame. Near Term Commercialization Projects CES has designed the combustor and control system for the 170 MW Dutch natural gas SEQ-1 Project. This project involves the use of a modified CES process in which Oxy-Fueled Gas Generator operates on recovered natural gas from a depleted gas field. The CO2 exhaust stream from the plant will be used for enhanced gas recovery at the supply reservoir. Several unique factors combine to favor the commercial viability of this project: (1) the Dutch government has legislation in place that subsidizes climate-neutral sources, including zero-emissions combustion systems, (2) the geology of the gas field (3) the project will be located where governmental financial stimulation of employment and business activity is available, and (4) developers have brought together the necessary entities to evaluate the project. A decision to proceed to the next phase is anticipated in 2007. 5

The Zero Emissions Norwegian Gas (ZENG) Project is being jointly developed in Norway. The goal of this program is to develop and demonstrate "near commercial" technology for Zero- Emissions Power Plants (ZEPP) using Norwegian natural gas in combination with the CES oxycombustion cycle. ZEPPs are of particular interest in Norway because of the high tax imposed on CO2 emissions. The plan is to construct a 50 MW demonstration power plant near Stavanger, Norway that is expected to be commissioned in 2009. Later, a high-efficiency 200 MW plant will be built at another Norwegian location. Additional Market Opportunities Currently, a number of viable commercial opportunities exist for using the Oxy-Fueled Gas Generator with existing power turbine technology where the excess heat, CO2 or ultra-low emissions are valued. CES is focusing specifically on developing zero emission power plant opportunities where the captured CO2 has commercial value and/or results in the avoidance/reduction of licensing and emissions credit costs. Since the exhaust stream of CES combustion process is largely CO2 and water, the CO2 can be separated and either sequestered or used in a commercial process. These plants have no emission stacks and a represent the ultimate environmental solution to clean power generation. The largest single market for CO2 is enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that 140 billion tons of CO2 could be sequestered as a result of EOR operations around the world. Currently, CO2-EOR operations in the U.S. inject about 33 million tons per year into the ground. About 90% of CO2 used for EOR in the U.S. is drawn from underground reservoirs. LNG facilities are frequently located in areas adjacent to oil and gas fields that may benefit from CO2. The need to gasify LNG at a receiving terminal presents a good cogeneration opportunity for conventional technology. However, because the CES system can use the cryogenic LNG as a heat sink for its air separation unit, steam condenser and compressors, an overall efficiency advantage over conventional generation can be achieved. The CES power system can also be configured for cogeneration at desalination plants. This concept is particularly attractive in desert areas near petroleum reservoirs where electricity, water and CO2 are required. The CES plant has an efficiency advantage over conventional cogeneration systems, not only because it produces injection ready CO2 for EOR, but because it is also a net producer of water. For example, a 550 MW CES power plant would produce about 180 million gallons of water per year. 6

A recent United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage documents the vital role that oxy fuel combustion and other carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies can play in controlling CO 2 emissions. The UN report indicated the CCS technology can contribute an equal or greater amount of GHG reduction than that provided by renewable energy, conservation and energy efficiency. Southern California Zero Emission Power Plant Demonstration Project CES is planning to construct a 50 MW zero emission natural gas power plant in southern California. As envisioned: DOE/WestCarb 2 has earmarked $60 million for a CO2 sequestration demonstration project. DOE/WestCarb would purchase the CO2 from this plant over a 3-4 year period for sequestration at an adjacent saline aquifer. Oil companies would purchase the CO2 in years 5 20 for EOR projects. A 50 MW power plant would produce enough CO2 to meet the needs of WestCarb and subsequent CO2 flood operations. In addition to demonstrating CO2 sequestration, it would serve as a test bed for progressively more efficient steam turbines and renewable fuels. In addition the DOE and CEC, potential project partners include Siemens, Occidental, AES and Paramount Resources (a Canadian oil producer). Most of the details of this project are yet to be determined. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is the project lead for WestCarb. The initial economics as provided by CES are suggest power costs ranging from about 8 /kwh to 10 /kwh, depending on variables such as plant configuration, subsidies, CO2 value and fuel costs. 2 The West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (known as WESTCARB) is exploring opportunities in six Western states and one province for removing CO2 from the atmosphere by enhancing natural processes and by capturing it at industrial facilities before it is emitted, both of which will help slow the atmospheric buildup of this greenhouse gas and its associated climatic effects. 7