Call for Papers Journal of Educational Technology & Society (ISSN: 1436 4522 (online) and 1176 3647 (print))



Similar documents
elfa2015 Pedagogical Implications of a Crossword Puzzle Mobile Application for Language Learning

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Farmer Mentor Handbook Adult Learning Styles. Adult Learning Styles

LEARNING REDISTRIBUTED

The University of South Dakota. School of Education. Division of Educational Leadership. EDAD 701 Introduction to Educational Administration 3 credits

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

What is the PYP Perspective on Assessment?

DESIGNING A VOIP BASED LANGUAGE TEST

OVERVIEW BANNATYNE CAMPUS U OF M SCHEDULING INITIATIVE: ASSIGNING CLASSROOM, MEETING AND EVENT SPACE

An Engagement Model for Learning: Providing a Framework to Identify Technology Services

Japanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy

INTRODUCTION: COURSE OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA FOR RECEIVING THE SIT TESOL CERTIFICATE

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

Ten Trends Affecting the Field of Instructional Design and Technology

Standards and progression point examples

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals DEANSHIP OF ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT KFUPM ONLINE COURSES:

BOILING AND PEELING OF EGGS

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

HOW EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TOOLS CAN SOLVE CHALLENGES IN TEACHING AN ONLINE FINANCE COURSE? Presented by: Laura Vatsala & Shubha P Asst.

Chapter 3 FACTORS OF DISTANCE LEARNING

Assessment Policy. 1 Introduction. 2 Background

Evidence of Learning in the 21 st Century Classroom Classroom Observation Rubric To Guide Leadership for Learning by Instructional Leaders TASK

METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF NON-FORMAL AND INFORMAL LEARNING ACHIEVEMENTS IN A STUDY PROCESS

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation - Instructions to Authors -

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHING READING

POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Hybrid Instructional Design Model Based on Constructivism for Web

Multimedia & the World Wide Web

Training and Educational Leader Self-Assessment: a tool for systematically determining the development needs of training and educational leaders

Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

Poetry Kids Online Learning Environment

The learning system used in ECE 1270 has been designed on the basis of the principles of

NATIONAL COMPETENCY-BASED TEACHER STANDARDS (NCBTS) A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FOR FILIPINO TEACHERS

Item transformation for computer assisted language testing: The adaptation of the Spanish University entrance examination

for Technology (ICT) Literate Students

Class of 2020: Action Plan for Education

Are students enrolling in the course college freshman and sophomores or college juniors and seniors, or a mix?

Instructional Design Quality: An Evaluation of Open Education Europa Networks Open Courses using the First Principles of Instruction

SYLLABUS COURSE TITLE & NUMBER COURSE DESCRIPTION. Secondary Content Methods Online

School Counselor (501)

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Assessment Policy

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF INFORMATION SI301: Models of Social Information Processing Syllabus

Technology Plan Saugus Public Schools

Delta College English 112 Course Syllabus

International Baccalaureate Diploma Assessment Policy Holy Heart of Mary High School

Unit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning

An Interactive Web Based Virtual Factory Model for Teaching Production Concepts

Program Assessment Report. Unit Psychology Program name: Clinical Psychology MA Completed by David Grilly May 2007

Ranges TEC delivers mainly to a target clientele of Secondary School Students undertaking VCAL who:

4 EXISTING CLASSIFICATIONS AND FORMULATION OF THE MODEL

December 7, Dear Parents of Students in Grades 6-12,

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Master Technology Teacher Standards

Faculty Guidelines for Graduate Online/Hybrid Course Development

Underhill, B., McAnally, K., Koriah, J., (2007) Executive Coaching for Results: The Definitive Guide to Developing Organizational Leaders.

DEEPER LEARNING COMPETENCIES April 2013

b. A handout for your MATESOL Conference presentation

Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure

Teaching Methodology for 3D Animation

PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND THE USE OF NEW LEARNING- TEACHING METHODOLOGY

Executive Summary. Southeast Career Technical Academy

Introduction to Educational Psychology AEDP235. Spring A. AEDP 235 Introduction to Educational Psychology (3)

Chapter 3 - Alternative Assessments

Worrell, W. A., & Vesilind, P. A. (2012). Solid waste engineering (2nd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

Leadership Portfolio

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Iowa State University Educational Leadership and Policy Studies RESEV 550XA: Educational Research

Enhance student s learning with an aid of simulation software to understand Computer Networking Undergraduate courses.

BOCES Educational Consortium Testimony

Reading Competencies

The Role of History of Mathematics in Mathematics Education

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology School of Business and Management Spring 2015

Secondary School Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Using social technologies in Computer Assisted Language Learning: development of a theoretical and methodological framework

Core requirements for teachers of English: knowledge and performance

Before you begin to adapt your course for online learning, consider the following questions:

AGEC 448 AGEC 601 AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY FUTURES COMMODITY FUTURES & OPTIONS MARKETS SYLLABUS SPRING 2014 SCHEDULE

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Issues, Mandates, and Ethics in Special Education - 05.

University of Alabama College of Communication and Information Sciences School of Library and Information Studies. LS 560 Information Technology

Developing Research & Communication Skills

PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus

Socially-based Curriculum Unit: A Model United Nations

Master of Arts in English Language Learning for Grade PreK 12 Teachers

Student Learning Contract [SAMPLE] 1. University of Wisconsin Oshkosh: Social Work Department

PRL Program Orientation PowerPoint Narration

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING & ROAD TRANSPORT

Embedding Benefits Final Report Template

It s Lab Time Connecting Schools to Universities Remote Laboratories

Peer Tutoring and Small Groups in the Elementary Classroom. By: Dana Chartrand

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

Evaluating Students in the Classroom Faculty Development Conference February 2007 D. P. Shelton, MSN, RN, CNE, EdD (c)

How Technology Executives are Managing the Shift to BYOD

How To Write A Portfolio

CS 2302 Data Structures Spring 2015

Transcription:

Call for Papers Journal of Educational Technology & Society (ISSN: 1436 4522 (online) and 1176 3647 (print)) Special Issue on Technology Supported Assessment in Formal and Informal Learning Guest Editors Prof. Dr. Jesus Garcia Laborda, Prof. Dr. Eduardo Guzman, Prof. Dr. Ronald K. Hambleton, Prof. Dr. Demetrios G Sampson Assessment can be considered as a systematic process of making judgments, and consequently reporting results, either about the effectiveness (with respect to achievement of intended learning outcomes) of learning and educational processes (ranging from formally established educational programs to informal learning experiences), or about individual students progress toward attainment of established educational objectives. Technology holds the potential to facilitate assessment implementation and maximize the benefits for all involved stakeholders. Cases of technology enabled assessment are traced back to the use of the abacus and writing techniques for evaluating knowledge acquisition more than 2000 years ago. However, the use of technology alone, without being followed by the necessary paradigm shifts, cannot result to a significant effect in learning and teaching. The sometimes divergent evidence reported indicate the need for re conceptualizing the ways in which technology should support both learning and assessment. Today, typically, learners and teachers use technology for accessing learning resources or submitting assigned homework, whereas technology has the potential to facilitate engagement in meaningful and authentic learning experiences and methods of keeping track of their levels of achievement. Technology is a vehicle that has the potential to help toward effectively meeting learning and assessment needs. However, this potential cannot be realized without taking account of the fact that learning and consequently assessment takes

place within the context (both social and technological) in which the learner acts. Appropriately designed methods and tools may facilitate monitoring of learning processes and, with the necessary technology led and/or instructor led feedback and scaffolds, learners are able to reflect and adjust their actions towards optimizing the outcomes of their efforts by performing even beyond their Zone of Proximal Development. A widely adopted field of application of technology for assessment purposes is that of computer based testing, with appropriately designed software tools being used for generating and administrating tests, as well as reporting results. Ease of test items development, reduced costs of administration to large numbers of examinees, increased levels of tests validity and reliability, and the capacity to communicate results in a variety of formats to a range of stakeholders constitute a number of reported advantages. Based on Item Response Theory, there is potential to generate tests of different difficulty levels, as well as adapt the difficulty level of assigned test items at the run time level depending on performance. Technology allows flexibility in time scheduling with learners being able to take tests anywhere and in any time. Thus, the act of assessment may not be constrained either by the physical boundaries of the traditional classroom or by the stiff school/university timetable. Additionally, there is potential for accommodating people with physical disabilities by providing appropriate input and output means. However, testing constitutes only one of the available category of assessment methods, and its use for grading and learners ranking only one of the many purposes of assessment. Despite the bespoken advantages of computer based testing, technology can reveal its real potential when used for the execution of assessment activities that are seamlessly interwoven in either formal or informal learning processes; that is, when used for formative assessment rather than summative assessment purposes. By this way both learners and instructors may have access to performance data in context that will help eliciting decisions about future learning directions. Simulations, digital games, virtual worlds, virtual labs, as well as the use of e portfolios, constitute characteristic examples of technological facilitators of formative, in situ, assessment. From this perspective, current trends in computer based testing, technology supported assessment in MOOCs, competence based assessment methods and tools, and innovative approaches regarding generation and administration of new types of test items and constructs, as well as validation processes, need to be considered within the context of technologysupported assessment. To this end, this special issue targets at efforts that may offer insights into current and future trends and research directions in technology based assessment and testing. As a starting point, submitted contributions may reflect one of the following research track, yet work that may introduce other relevant research topics is also well invited: Technological aspects of assessment and testing: This track relates not only to new applications (regarding development of new assessment tools and methods or innovative uses of existing ones) but also to applications (with respect to both hardware and software) that are not generally used for assessment purposes. Special interest is

posed in ongoing projects relating to assessment based on the use of portable devices (such as smartphones and tablets) as well as other ubiquitous devices and services. Technology as a facilitator of involved in assessment stakeholders: This track may include projects regarding teachers training in using technology with the aim to effectively proceed to design and implementation of assessment, diagnoses and inferences about students learning, improvement of test scores reporting, as well as providing other forms of feedback. Submitted contributions may provide the basis for new theoretical approaches to (computer based) test design, such as automated test design, and assessment of new constructs. Implementation of large-scale formal and informal assessment projects with special international relevance and serious implications for learning: Since impact is one of the most significant aspects of assessment, this direction is extremely significant to justify new technological developments and costs in terms of human and financial resources. Important dates Submissions of initial papers due: 15 March 2014 Decisions and Reflection on the initial papers selected: 1 June 2014 Revised manuscripts due: 1 September 2014 Feedback on revised manuscripts: 1 October 2014 Final manuscripts due by the authors: 15 November 2014 Final manuscripts sent to the publishers: 15 December 2014 Special Issue Publication: April 2015 Special Issue Guest Editors Prof. Dr. Jesus Garcia Laborda Department of Modern Philology Universidad de Alcala Alcala de Henares Madrid, Spain e mail: jesus.garcialaborda@uah.es

URL: http://www.ijls.net/editors/laborda.html Prof. Dr. Eduardo Guzman Department of languages and computation Universidad de Malaga Malaga, Spain e mail: guzman@lcc.uma.es URL: http://www.lcc.uma.es/~guzman/ Prof. Dr. Ronald K. Hambleton Center for Educational Assessment, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, United States e mail: rkh@educ.umass.edu URL: http://www.umass.edu/education/faculty staff listings/ronaldhambleton Prof. Dr. Demetrios G Sampson Department of Digital Systems, University of Piraeus Piraeus, Greece e mail: sampson@iti.gr URL: http://www.ask4research.info/ds_cv.php Submission guidelines The manuscripts should be original, unpublished, and not being considered for publication elsewhere at the time of submission to Educational Technology & Society or during the review process. The manuscripts must be about 7000 words (including: title, author names, affiliations, abstract, keywords, main body, references, tables, figures, and appendices). Please follow carefully the author guidelines found at http://www.ifets.info/rev.php?pub=true while preparing your manuscript. To become familiar with the style of the journal, please see a previous issue at http://www.ifets.info/. All manuscripts should be in MS Word format and submitted Please submit the paper to the EasyChair submission system for ETS SI TSA 2015 (ETS Special Issue on Technology Supported Assessment in Formal and Informal Learning) located at https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=etssia15. All manuscripts will be subject to the usual high standards of peer review at the ETS Journal, through a double blind review.

The Educational Technology & Society Journal is included in the Thomson Scientific Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) with impact factor of 1.171 according to Thomson Scientific 2012 Journal Citations Report.