A New Record Year for Chinese Outbound Investment in Europe

Similar documents
Comparing Chinese Investment into North America and Europe

NEW PASSENGER CAR REGISTRATIONS BY ALTERNATIVE FUEL TYPE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 Quarter

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the Fourth Quarter of Results for the Full Year of 2015

EUF STATISTICS. 31 December 2013

Computing our Future Computer programming and coding in schools in Europe. Anja Balanskat, Senior Manager European Schoolnet

Privatization in Central and Eastern Europewe

EU Energy Policy and the Energy Situation in Germany

Foreign Direct Investment

OHIO. The European Union. Why the EU Matters for the Buckeye State. Indiana University. European Union Center

Wind energy scenarios for A report by the European Wind Energy Association - July Wind energy scenarios for 2020

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the First Quarter of 2016

EBA REPORT ON THE BENCHMARKING OF DIVERSITY PRACTICES. EBA-Op July 2016

SMEs access to finance survey 2014

International investment continues to struggle

Alcohol Consumption in Ireland A Report for the Health Service Executive

1. Perception of the Bancruptcy System Perception of In-court Reorganisation... 4

INTERNATIONAL TRACKED POSTAGE SERVICE

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

How To Understand Factoring

Turkish Arab Economic Forum June 29, Mehmet Şimşek. Minister of Finance

Bulgaria at a glance. Location and key data

13 th Economic Trends Survey of the Architects Council of Europe

IMMIGRATION TO AND EMIGRATION FROM GERMANY IN THE LAST FEW YEARS

INVESTING IN A TRANSITIONING SECTOR

Q3 FDI flows are up, but 2013 is heading towards a second annual decline

Mutual Insurance in Figures. Executive summary from the 2007 study produced by AMICE s predecessor association, AISAM

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 102 February 2016

Trends in the European Investment Fund Industry. in the Second Quarter of Results for the first half of 2014

41 T Korea, Rep T Netherlands T Japan E Bulgaria T Argentina T Czech Republic T Greece 50.

The Legal Protection Insurance Market in Europe. October 2013

Funding and network opportunities for cluster internationalization

U.S. Trade Overview, 2013

Adverse macro-financial scenario for the EBA 2016 EU-wide bank stress testing exercise

Tourism trends in Europe and in Mediterranean Partner Countries,

Beer statistics edition. The Brewers of Europe

The innovation value chain:

FEDERATION EUROPEENNE DE LA MANUTENTION Product Group. industrial trucks. A brief guide for identification of noncompliant. - Exhaust Emission -

Credit transfer to Customer account with AS "Meridian Trade Bank" EUR, USD free of charge * Other countries currency information in the Bank

ALDI & LIDL: Europe s Hard Discount Threat

NERI Quarterly Economic Facts Summer Distribution of Income and Wealth

EUROPE 2020 TARGETS: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Pendulum Business Loan Brokers L.L.C. U.S. State Market Area

Finnish foreign trade 2014 Figures and diagrams FINNISH CUSTOMS Statistics 1

10TH EDITION MERGER CONTROL VADEMECUM FILING THRESHOLDS AND CLEARANCE CONDITIONS IN THE 29 EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONS

Labour Force Survey 2014 Almost 10 million part-time workers in the EU would have preferred to work more Two-thirds were women

McDonald s Economic Footprint in Europe: Did you know that...

IS ENERGY IN ESTONIA CHEAP OR EXPENSIVE?

ERASMUS+ MASTER LOANS

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Annual report 2009: the state of the drugs problem in Europe

Erasmus+ International Cooperation

187/ December EU28, euro area and United States GDP growth rates % change over the previous quarter

TOYOTA I_SITE More than fleet management

Family benefits Information about health insurance country. Udbetaling Danmark Kongens Vænge Hillerød. A. Personal data

99/ June EU28, euro area and United States GDP growth rates % change over the previous quarter

Finland must take a leap towards new innovations

ERASMUS FOR YOUNG ENTREPRENEURS : A NEW EXCHANGE PROGRAMME

Public Debt and Contingent Liabilities: A Cross-Country Comparison

Presentation of Mr. György Rétfalvi ITD Hungary

Energy prices in the EU Household electricity prices in the EU rose by 2.9% in 2014 Gas prices up by 2.0% in the EU

EU s Asylum Policy and the Danish Justice and Home Affairs Opt-Out

193/ December Hourly labour costs in the EU28 Member States, 2012 (in )

THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT FUND AND THE EVIDENCE OF THE UNDERTAKINGS FOR COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT IN TRANSFERABLE SECURITIES (UCITS) MARKET

Analysis of the EU fruit and vegetables sector

Analysis of statistics 2015

HONG KONG RIGHT PLACE RIGHT TIME RIGHT NOW

EUROPE 2020 TARGET: TERTIARY EDUCATION ATTAINMENT

TRADING STATEMENT FINANCIAL YEAR 2014/15

EIOPA Stress Test Press Briefing Frankfurt am Main, 4 July 2011

First estimate for 2014 Euro area international trade in goods surplus bn 24.2 bn surplus for EU28

Survey on the access to finance of enterprises (SAFE) Analytical Report 2015

EU Lesson Plan. Name of Teacher: Sharon Goralewski School: Oakland Schools Title of Lesson Plan: The European Union: United in Diversity

- Assessment of the application by Member States of European Union VAT provisions with particular relevance to the Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS) -

Electricity, Gas and Water: The European Market Report 2014

Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe

Principles for application of international reference pricing systems

Development aid in 2015 continues to grow despite costs for in-donor refugees

Towards a Single Market for Occupational Pensions Without Tax Obstacles

Planned Healthcare in Europe for Lothian residents

World Solution Provider

Car tax refund on export

SEPA. Changes in the Payment System Implementation of the European SEPA Regulations for Kuna and Euro Payments

The Tax Burden of Typical Workers in the EU Edition

A European Unemployment Insurance Scheme

Beyond the Youth Guarantee Lessons learned in the first year of implementation

Lisa Evers (ZEW), Christoph Spengel (University of Mannheim and ZEW), Julia Braun (ZEW)

Comparison of annuity markets (OECD National Annuity Markets: Features and Implications, Rusconi 2008) Mercer

THE ORGANISATION AND FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN LATVIA

Country trade view Italy. Trends in global trade

Group overview Veli-Matti Mattila CEO

ARE THE POINTS OF SINGLE CONTACT TRULY MAKING THINGS EASIER FOR EUROPEAN COMPANIES?

EN ISO Safety of machinery Risk assessment. Sicherheit von Maschinen Risikobeurteilung Teil 1: Leitsätze (ISO :2007)

Transcription:

A New Record Year for Chinese Outbound Investment in Europe Thilo Hanemann and Mikko Huotari February 2016 China s global outbound FDI continued to surge in 2015 and the Chinese leadership touts investment as a new pillar of China s positive contributions to the global economy. Chinese OFDI in Europe hits another record high in 2015, highlighting the potential for China as a source of productive capital but also reinforcing existing concerns. The new realities of slower growth and transition to a new economic model explain Chinese investors focus on advanced industrial assets, modern services, and real estate. State-owned investors continue to account for a majority of China s EU OFDI, and new financing entities could further boost the role of state capital. Chinese investment increasingly extends beyond the Big Three economies (Germany, France, UK), fuelling the intra-european competition for Chinese capital. Germany remains one of the most appealing destinations for Chinese investors looking for technology, consumer markets, and safe haven assets. China s global investment boom is unlikely to end any time soon but China s fight against capital flight and bad debt pose short-term risks for 2016.

A New Record Year for Chinese Outbound Investment in Europe Chinese investment in Europe has grown exponentially in recent years, as discussed in our in-depth special report ( Chinese FDI in Europe and Germany Preparing for a New Era of Chinese Capital ) released last year. This note provides an update on Chinese investment patterns in Europe in 2015. We find that Chinese outbound foreign direct investment (OFDI) hit a new record high of EUR 20 billion last year, illustrating China s potential to become an important source of capital for Europe. At the same time, the competition among EU states for Chinese capital has intensified, which already weakens European leverage vis-à-vis China on important strategic questions. Moreover, investment patterns in 2015 further aggravate existing economic concerns related to Chinese investment, most importantly the lack of equal market access for European companies in China and potential market distortions through state-owned and statesupported enterprises. Addressing those concerns now is critical as China expects to deploy an additional USD 1 trillion in outward FDI in the coming five years in Europe and globally. China s global outbound FDI continued to surge in 2015 and the Chinese leadership touts investment as a new pillar of China s positive contributions to the global economy China s global outward FDI has been on an impressive growth trajectory for the last decade and flows climbed to a new record high last year. While official full-year data is not yet available, we estimate that outward FDI flows hit USD 130-140 billion in 2015, up from USD 123 billion in 2014. China s global OFDI stock now exceeds USD 1 trillion, triple the amount compared to just five years ago. This impressive growth has turned China from a small player to one of the world s largest exporters of FDI, accounting for almost 10% of global OFDI flows. China s rapid ascent to an exporter of capital harbours huge potential for host economies, and the Chinese government has discovered OFDI as the new showcase for China s positive contribution to the global economy. Chinese investment now takes a top spot on the agenda of major diplomatic occasions as China is eager to counterbalance growing negativism about falling Chinese demand for foreign goods and China s ballooning trade surpluses. Chinese diplomats also increasingly use the promise of investment and other financial flows as a diplomatic instrument to seek politically favourable outcomes in negotiations with the EU and its member states. 2 MERICS

160 140 120 Chinese Annual Outward FDI Flows, USD billion (Left Axis) China's Share in Total Global Outward FDI Flows, % Share (Right Axis) 10% 9% 8% 7% Figure 1: China s Global Outward FDI Boom Continues USD billion; Percent 100 6% 80 5% 60 4% 40 3% 2% 20 1% 0 1985 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 0% 2015 Source: Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), United Nations Conference on Trade and Investment (UNCTAD), authors calculations. Chinese OFDI in Europe hits another record high in 2015, highlighting the potential for China as a source of productive capital but also reinforcing existing concerns Europe has emerged as a main destination for Chinese OFDI, in line with a broader shift of Chinese investment from developing and emerging to high-income economies. In 2015, Chinese companies invested EUR 20 billion in the EU, a 44% jump compared to last year s EUR 14 billion. Much of the increase can be attributed to ChemChina s EUR 7 billion acquisition of Italian tire producer Pirelli, the biggest Chinese takeover in the EU to date. In the past five years, annual Chinese FDI in the EU averaged more than EUR 10 billion, compared to around EUR 1 billion annually in the previous five years. The new record high of Chinese OFDI in 2015 further reaffirms our view that the jump in Chinese investment was not just a temporary episode of opportunistic buying after the crisis, but must be seen as a structural story fuelled by changes in the Chinese economy and Europe s position as a safe haven economy with an attractive asset base. At the same time, the 2015 investment patterns further aggravate existing concerns about economic risks related to these investments. Most importantly, the new record figures for Chinese FDI in Europe are in stark contrast with stagnant or even declining FDI by European companies in China, which further increases the risk of imbalances in two-way FDI patterns. This highlights the urgency to reduce formal and informal barriers on foreign investment in the Chinese economy using instruments such as the Bilateral Investment Agreement currently under negotiation. MERICS 3

Figure 2: Chinese OFDI in Europe hits a new Record high in 2015 Value of Chinese OFDI Transactions in EU-28 Economies EUR million Total Others NXP RF Power unit Louvre Hotels Club Med SNS Reaal insurance Pirelli 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0 Source: Rhodium Group. The new realities of slower growth and transition to a new economic model explain Chinese investors focus on advanced industrial assets, modern services, and real estate The industry distribution of Chinese OFDI in Europe in 2015 confirms that the changing economic realities in China are driving these investments. Beginning structural adjustment and growing volatility has increased the pressure on Chinese companies to diversify and gear up for even greater competition at home, which is fostering a greater appetite for international expansion and risk taking. In 2015, Chinese interest further shifted towards a more diverse mix of assets including technology, advanced services, brands, and consumer-related assets. The automotive sector took the top spot (Pirelli), followed by real estate and hospitality (Louvre Hotels, Club Med), information and telecommunication technology (NXP Semiconductors RF business) and financial services (SNS Reaal s insurance unit, Banco Espirito Santo s investment banking unit). Importantly, Chinese interest is growing particularly fast in sectors that remain restricted to foreign investors back in China, amplifying the political salience of unequal market access. One example is financial services, where EU companies have long been frustrated in their attempt to compete head-to-head with local players in the Chinese market. The recent growth of Chinese outward investment in these sectors should give Europe greater leverage to demand a level playing field in bilateral negotiations. Another politically relevant trend is that China has recently become more successful in gaining services contracts coupled with infrastructure investments. Examples for these new ambitions are the Hinkley Point nuclear power plant, the Swansea Bay tidal lagoon, railway construction in Hungary and power plants in Romania. Potential political implications include transnational security concerns and a window of opportunity to integrate China into relevant existing international agreements, including OECD rules on export financing and the Government Procurement Agreement under the World Trade Organization (WTO). 4 MERICS

Others ICT Machinery Finance & Business Services Real Estate and Hospitlity Energy Automotive 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 Figure 3: Chinese Investors are Targeting a more Diverse mix of Sectors in Europe Distribution of Chinese OFDI in the EU-28 by industry 2000 2015 EUR million 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Agriculture & Food 2.000 0 Source: Rhodium Group. State-owned investors continue to account for majority of China s EU OFDI, and new financing entities could further boost the role of state capital Initially a domain of sovereign and state-owned investors, private sector companies have become an increasingly important driver of China s global outward FDI in recent years. In 2015, investment by private Chinese firms in Europe reached EUR 6 billion, the highest level on record. At the same time, state-owned investment jumped as well due to a number of large investments including the ChemChina-Pirelli transaction, the acquisition of Louvre Hotels by Shanghai Jinjiang, and investments by China Investment Corporation in Germany, France, and Belgium. The share of SOEs in total Chinese investment increased from 62% in 2014 to 70% in 2015. China s new strategic One Belt One Road initiative could further boost the role of state capital in Europe as China s policy banks, sovereign wealth funds and commercial entities are in the process of setting up a flurry of new vehicles to finance large-scale projects on the continent. Sovereign and state-related investment from China offers plenty of opportunities for Europe to advance new projects where interests are aligned, for instance, with regard to infrastructure development in Eastern Europe. At the same time, China s new policydriven financing push has the potential to undermine EU integrity and geoeconomic interests in its neighborhood. It also challenges Europe s long-standing goal of disciplining subsidies and state aid to ensure private capital is not being crowded out by state-related actors not operating on market principles. MERICS 5

Figure 4: State-owned Investors still Account for the Majority of Chinese FDI in Europe Share of Chinese OFDI in the EU-28 by investor type 2000 2015 Percent share 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Investment by State-owned Entities Share of State-owned (4-year average) Investment by Private Entities Source: Rhodium Group. State-owned entities refer to companies that are at least 20% owned by the government, sovereign entities, and central SOE s; private entities refer to companies with less than 20% ownership by the government, sovereign entities, and central SOE s. Chinese investment increasingly extends beyond the Big Three economies, fuelling the intra-european competition for Chinese capital Chinese investors have broadly followed the footsteps of other foreign investors in Europe by putting most of their investments in the wealthiest and largest European economies. The Big Three (Germany, the UK, and France) have received a relatively constant figure of 4-8bn EUR over the last five years and they continued to be major targets in 2015. The big story of the past two years, however, is the sharp increase of Chinese OFDI in other parts of Europe. In 2015, Southern European economies accounted for almost half of all Chinese EU investment for the first time. High-profile flagship deals (ChemChina s acquisition of Pirelli, Wanda s investment in Atletico Madrid, and Haitong s acquisition of Banco Espirito Santo s investment banking business) have put China in the role of a significant investor in those economies, amid otherwise sluggish FDI inflows. Investments in the Benelux countries also increased markedly in past two years and pending projects could further boost Chinese presence in Eastern Europe if they materialize. The broader geographic dispersion of Chinese OFDI across Europe has increased competition between EU states for Chinese investment. In 2015, virtually every EU member state has sought high-level exchanges with China to strengthen bilateral investment and China is increasingly able to use the promise of capital as a carrot for other foreign policy goals. Greater capital flows, for example, remain the core driver of the rapidly evolving 16+1 relationship between China and Central and Eastern European economies. Another example is the UK, where a flurry of high-profile investments has contributed to a visible shift in the UK s China policy. This race for Chinese investment is also contributing to a division between European economies over important economic policy decisions, most recently whether the EU should grant China Market Economy Status or if the EU should enter negotiations over a potential free trade agreement with China. 6 MERICS

Figure 5: Chinese FDI in the EU-28 2000 2015 Chinese FDI is Spread Across all of Europe Greenfield and M&A transactions in the EU-28 by geographic location; value of cumulative investment from 2000 2015 Finland 103 0 500 500 2,000 2,000 5,000 EUR million Sweden 1,592 Estonia 23 5,000 10,000 > 10,000 Latvia 3 Denmark 134 Lithuania 32 Ireland 108 UK 15,164 France 9,485 Netherlands 5,279 Belgium 1,680 Luxembourg 495 Germany 7,905 Italy 11,186 Slovenia 8 Austria 506 Poland 462 Czech Rep. 207 Slovakia 40 Croatia 4 Hungary 1,975 Romania 741 Portugal 5,527 Spain 1,520 Bulgaria 222 Greece 405 Malta 69 Cyprus 31 Source: Rhodium Group. A detailed explanation of sources and methodology can be found in the Data Appendix of the full June 2015 study available at cofdi.merics.org. MERICS 7

Figure 6: Southern Europe now Receives a Significant Share of Chinese FDI Chinese OFDI in the EU-28 by country group 2000 2015 EUR million Northern Europe Southern Europe Eastern Europe Benelux Big 3 20.000 18.000 16.000 14.000 12.000 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 2.000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Rhodium Group. The Big 3 includes France, Germany, and the UK. Benelux includes Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg. Eastern Europe includes Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia. Southern Europe includes Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain. Northern Europe includes Estonia, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Sweden. Germany remains one of the most appealing destinations for Chinese investors looking for technology, consumer markets, and safe haven assets Among all EU economies, Germany has seen the most constant inflow of Chinese investment over the past five years. In 2015, Chinese FDI in Germany dropped slightly to EUR 1.2 billion (compared to EUR 1.4 billion in 2014), in the absence of large-scale takeovers observed in other EU economies. However, a strong pipeline of pending transactions (reaching EUR 2.5 billion as of Februrary 2016) confirms that Germany has not lost its strong appeal to Chinese investors. Automotive and machinery continued to attract Chinese interest in 2015, with a total of more than EUR 400 million in completed transactions. The most important deals were the acquisitions of automotive suppliers WEGU Holding and Quin, and Weichai s increase of its stake in KION, a producer of forklift trucks and warehouse technology. Chinese investors also continued to expand their research and development (R&D) footprint with new facilities in advanced component materials (Kangde Xin), biotechnology (KTB Tumorforschung), and other areas (rail technology, mobile device innovation, and electric vehicles). Another important trend is that Germany is becoming increasingly attractive for Chinese financial investors seeking stable long-term returns. In 2015, China s sovereign wealth fund acquired a stake in German s largest operator of gas and service stations (Tank und Rast), and conglomerate Fosun acquired a significant (but non-fdi) stake in KTG Agrar, one of the biggest agricultural companies farming food crops in Eastern Germany and Europe. Recently announced and pending investments point to a substantially growing Chinese footprint in machinery (ChemChina s acquisition of KraussMaffei), environmental technologies (Beijing Enterprises acquisition of EEW Energy) and financial services 8 MERICS

(Hauck & Aufhaeuser). Government encouragement and the creation of financing vehicles such as the new Industry 4.0 fund will likely further boost Chinese spending on German R&D and advanced manufacturing assets in coming years. Total Hauck & Aufhaeuser KraussMaffei 2.500 2.000 Figure 7: Strong Outlook for Chinese OFDI in Germany Chinese investment in Germany, 2000 2015 Others EEW 1.500 EUR million Quin WEGU Kion 500 Tank & Rast 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 to date 0 Source: Rhodium Group. China s global investment boom is unlikely to end any time soon but China s fight against capital flight and bad debt pose short-term risks for 2016 New record deals in early 2016 in Europe and the pipeline of transactions suggest that China s recent buying spree will continue in 2016. At the same time, the current economic and political situation poses some downside risks for Chinese outbound investment in 2016. The volatility in China s markets and continued downward pressure on the USD/ CNY exchange have forced Chinese officials to further ratchet up capital controls to stop the massive outflow of capital, and there is anecdotal evidence that these measures are increasingly impacting Chinese companies access to foreign exchange, including for OFDI projects. Reforms aimed at improving credit allocation and cleaning up bad debt could also pose a medium-term risk for outward FDI if they threaten firms credit lines for overseas expansion. Finally, the temporary disappearance of Fosun Chairman Guo in December 2015 pointed to the risk of China s anti-corruption crackdown shifting to private companies, which could impact their appetite for deals in the EU and elsewhere. MERICS 9

Figure 8: China s Leaders Project USD 1 Trillion of Outward FDI Flows in Coming Five Years China s annual outward FDI flows 300 250 200 USD billion 150 100 50 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0 Source: MOFCOM, author s calculations. MOFCOM figures are used as State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) no longer provides directional data on Chinese investment abroad since transitioning to IMF s BPM 6 manual. 2015-2020 are projections; 2016 2020 estimated using USD 1 trillion as total and assuming constant growth. In the long run, however, the structural drivers for continued expansion of Chinese outbound FDI stronger commercial rationales for companies to venture overseas and supportive policy remain firmly in place. Pressure on Chinese companies to internationalize will increase further in light of structural reforms, higher input costs, and shrinking margins at home. High-level rhetoric also remains highly supportive, despite the short-term crackdown on capital outflows. China s Premier Li Keqiang recently touted that China expects to deploy USD 1 trillion of OFDI over the next five years globally, which would boost annual outflows to an average of USD 200 billion per year, making China the second largest exporter of FDI behind the United States. 10 MERICS

Imprint Mercator Institute for China Studies MERICS ggmbh Klosterstraße 64, 10179 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49 30 3440 999-0 Email: info(at)merics.de www.merics.org COPYRIGHT 2016 MERCATOR INSTITUTE FOR CHINA STUDIES RHODIUM GROUP, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Disclaimer: Although the authors of this report have used their best efforts in its preparation, they assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions, nor any liability for damages resulting from the use of or reliance on information contained herein. MERICS 11