Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint



Similar documents
Geometry Notes VOLUME AND SURFACE AREA

Solids. Objective A: Volume of a Solids

Math 53 Worksheet Solutions- Minmax and Lagrange

Linear Equations and Inequalities

8 Polynomials Worksheet

Sample Midterm Solutions

Chapter 6. Linear Programming: The Simplex Method. Introduction to the Big M Method. Section 4 Maximization and Minimization with Problem Constraints

Geometry Notes PERIMETER AND AREA

This unit will lay the groundwork for later units where the students will extend this knowledge to quadratic and exponential functions.

3.1. RATIONAL EXPRESSIONS

mod 10 = mod 10 = 49 mod 10 = 9.

Negative Integer Exponents

A Short Guide to Significant Figures

POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS

Practice Test Answer and Alignment Document Mathematics: Algebra II Performance Based Assessment - Paper

MA107 Precalculus Algebra Exam 2 Review Solutions

Clifton High School Mathematics Summer Workbook Algebra 1

3 1B: Solving a System of Equations by Substitution

On Black-Scholes Equation, Black- Scholes Formula and Binary Option Price

QUADRATIC EQUATIONS EXPECTED BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE

Section Continued

Grade 6 Mathematics Performance Level Descriptors

FCAT FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT TEST. Mathematics Reference Sheets. Copyright Statement for this Assessment and Evaluation Services Publication

Section 1.1 Linear Equations: Slope and Equations of Lines

Linear Programming Notes V Problem Transformations

Integer Operations. Overview. Grade 7 Mathematics, Quarter 1, Unit 1.1. Number of Instructional Days: 15 (1 day = 45 minutes) Essential Questions

Name: ID: Discussion Section:

5.1 Radical Notation and Rational Exponents

Prot Maximization and Cost Minimization

NPV Versus IRR. W.L. Silber We know that if the cost of capital is 18 percent we reject the project because the NPV

0.8 Rational Expressions and Equations

LINEAR INEQUALITIES. Mathematics is the art of saying many things in many different ways. MAXWELL

Solutions of Linear Equations in One Variable

Math 120 Final Exam Practice Problems, Form: A

Deriving Demand Functions - Examples 1

Linear Equations in One Variable

MATH 10550, EXAM 2 SOLUTIONS. x 2 + 2xy y 2 + x = 2

Objective. Materials. TI-73 Calculator

Linear Programming Problems

Chapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions

(a) We have x = 3 + 2t, y = 2 t, z = 6 so solving for t we get the symmetric equations. x 3 2. = 2 y, z = 6. t 2 2t + 1 = 0,


Solutions to Math 51 First Exam January 29, 2015

Scientific Programming

Student Outcomes. Lesson Notes. Classwork. Exercises 1 3 (4 minutes)

Solving Linear Equations - General Equations

Determine If An Equation Represents a Function

Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content

Click on the links below to jump directly to the relevant section

Practical Guide to the Simplex Method of Linear Programming

c. Given your answer in part (b), what do you anticipate will happen in this market in the long-run?

1 Mathematical Models of Cost, Revenue and Profit

Math Released Set Algebra 1 PBA Item #13 Two Real Numbers Defined M44105

Mathematical goals. Starting points. Materials required. Time needed

Algebra Word Problems

EQUATIONS and INEQUALITIES

Mathematical Modeling and Optimization Problems Answers

Formulas and Problem Solving

Linear Programming. Solving LP Models Using MS Excel, 18

Multiplying and Dividing Listen & Learn PRESENTED BY MATHMANIAC Mathematics, Grade 8

Lesson 4: Surface Area

0 0 such that f x L whenever x a

1 Error in Euler s Method

No Solution Equations Let s look at the following equation: 2 +3=2 +7

Part II: Evaluating business & engineering assets

2.6 Exponents and Order of Operations

How do you compare numbers? On a number line, larger numbers are to the right and smaller numbers are to the left.

HFCC Math Lab Beginning Algebra 13 TRANSLATING ENGLISH INTO ALGEBRA: WORDS, PHRASE, SENTENCES

SECOND DERIVATIVE TEST FOR CONSTRAINED EXTREMA

Least-Squares Intersection of Lines

MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

LINEAR INEQUALITIES. less than, < 2x + 5 x 3 less than or equal to, greater than, > 3x 2 x 6 greater than or equal to,

Math 115 Extra Problems for 5.5

5.3 Graphing Cubic Functions

Largest Fixed-Aspect, Axis-Aligned Rectangle

MCB4UW Optimization Problems Handout 4.6

Partial Fractions. Combining fractions over a common denominator is a familiar operation from algebra:

Practice with Proofs

Definition 8.1 Two inequalities are equivalent if they have the same solution set. Add or Subtract the same value on both sides of the inequality.

B = = 84 in2. Since h = 20 in then the total volume is. V = = 1680 in 3

7 Literal Equations and

Basic numerical skills: EQUATIONS AND HOW TO SOLVE THEM. x + 5 = = (2-2) = = 5. x = 7-5. x + 0 = 20.

MATH 100 PRACTICE FINAL EXAM

Florida Math Correlation of the ALEKS course Florida Math 0018 to the Florida Mathematics Competencies - Lower

Use order of operations to simplify. Show all steps in the space provided below each problem. INTEGER OPERATIONS

Graphing - Parallel and Perpendicular Lines

A Quick Algebra Review

Solving Rational Equations

Solving Equations by the Multiplication Property

7 Gaussian Elimination and LU Factorization

MA4001 Engineering Mathematics 1 Lecture 10 Limits and Continuity

Mathematics Common Core Sample Questions

Microeconomics Sept. 16, 2010 NOTES ON CALCULUS AND UTILITY FUNCTIONS

SAT Subject Math Level 2 Facts & Formulas

Session 7 Fractions and Decimals

Lateral and Surface Area of Right Prisms

Financial Mathematics

A Resource for Free-standing Mathematics Qualifications

6. The given function is only drawn for x > 0. Complete the function for x < 0 with the following conditions:

Pearson Algebra 1 Common Core 2015

Transcription:

Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint Math 8 Department of Mathematics Dartmouth College Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.1/9

Maximizing wih a constraint We wish to solve the following problem: Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that has a surface area of 70cm 2. Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.2/9

Maximizing wih a constraint We wish to solve the following problem: Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that has a surface area of 70cm 2. We begin by translating this into a set of equations: V = lwh SA = 2lw + 2wh + 2lh Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.2/9

Maximizing wih a constraint We wish to solve the following problem: Find the maximum volume of a rectangular box that has a surface area of 70cm 2. We begin by translating this into a set of equations: V = lwh SA = 2lw + 2wh + 2lh Solving the surface area equation for h yields h = 35 lw l + w Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.2/9

Defining V in terms of l and w So far, we have h = 35 lw l + w Plugging this into the volume equation yields ( ) 35 lw V = lw = 35lw l2 w 2 l + w l + w Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.3/9

Defining V in terms of l and w So far, we have h = 35 lw l + w Plugging this into the volume equation yields ( ) 35 lw V = lw = 35lw l2 w 2 l + w l + w We will now maximize this function for positive values of l and w - negative values do not make sense physically. Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.3/9

Defining V in terms of l and w So far, we have h = 35 lw l + w Plugging this into the volume equation yields ( ) 35 lw V = lw = 35lw l2 w 2 l + w l + w We will now maximize this function for positive values of l and w - negative values do not make sense physically. To do this, we follow our maximization/minimization procedure. 1. Find the critical points of V with l 0 and w 0 2. Test critical points and boundary points to find maximum Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.3/9

Calculating V l First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l: l V = l 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.4/9

Calculating V l First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l: l V = l 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35w 2lw2 )(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35lw 2l2 w 2 + 35w 2 2lw 3 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.4/9

Calculating V l First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l: l V = l 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35w 2lw2 )(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35lw 2l2 w 2 + 35w 2 2lw 3 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.4/9

Calculating V l First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l: l V = l 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35w 2lw2 )(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35lw 2l2 w 2 + 35w 2 2lw 3 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = l2 w 2 + 35w 2 2lw 3 (l + w) 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.4/9

Calculating V l First, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to l: l V = l 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35w 2lw2 )(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35lw 2l2 w 2 + 35w 2 2lw 3 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = l2 w 2 + 35w 2 2lw 3 (l + w) 2 = w 2 (l + w) 2 (35 2lw l2 ) Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.4/9

Calculating V w Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w: w V = w 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.5/9

Calculating V w Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w: w V = w 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35l 2l2 w)(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35l2 2l 3 w + 35lw 2l 2 w 2 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.5/9

Calculating V w Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w: w V = w 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35l 2l2 w)(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35l2 2l 3 w + 35lw 2l 2 w 2 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.5/9

Calculating V w Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w: w V = w 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35l 2l2 w)(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35l2 2l 3 w + 35lw 2l 2 w 2 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35l2 l 2 w 2 2l 3 w (l + w) 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.5/9

Calculating V w Second, calculate the partial derivative of V with respect to w: w V = w 35lw l 2 w 2 l + w = (35l 2l2 w)(l + w) 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35l2 2l 3 w + 35lw 2l 2 w 2 35lw + l 2 w 2 (l + w) 2 = 35l2 l 2 w 2 2l 3 w (l + w) 2 = l 2 (l + w) 2 (35 2lw w2 ) Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.5/9

Find critical points From the previous computations, we have V (l, w) = ( w 2 (l + w) 2 (35 2lw l2 ), l 2 ) (l + w) 2 (35 2lw w2 ) Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.6/9

Find critical points From the previous computations, we have V (l, w) = ( w 2 (l + w) 2 (35 2lw l2 ), l 2 ) (l + w) 2 (35 2lw w2 ) Assuming, for physical reasons, that l and w are nonzero, we need to solve the system 35 2lw l 2 = 0 35 2lw w 2 = 0 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.6/9

Find critical points From the previous computations, we have V (l, w) = ( w 2 (l + w) 2 (35 2lw l2 ), l 2 ) (l + w) 2 (35 2lw w2 ) Assuming, for physical reasons, that l and w are nonzero, we need to solve the system 35 2lw l 2 = 0 35 2lw w 2 = 0 Subtracting the second equation from the first yields: (35 2lw l 2 ) (35 2lw w 2 ) = 0 l 2 + w 2 = 0 w = ±l Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.6/9

Find critical points From the previous computations, we have V (l, w) = ( w 2 (l + w) 2 (35 2lw l2 ), l 2 ) (l + w) 2 (35 2lw w2 ) Assuming, for physical reasons, that l and w are nonzero, we need to solve the system 35 2lw l 2 = 0 35 2lw w 2 = 0 Subtracting the second equation from the first yields: (35 2lw l 2 ) (35 2lw w 2 ) = 0 l 2 + w 2 = 0 w = ±l Again, to be physically reasonable, both l and w are positive so, l = w Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.6/9

Solving for critical points So far, we have that l = w. Plugging this into the first equation 35 2lw l 2 = 0, we get 35 2l 2 l 2 = 0 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.7/9

Solving for critical points So far, we have that l = w. Plugging this into the first equation 35 2lw l 2 = 0, we get 35 2l 2 l 2 = 0 Or, l 2 = 35 3 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.7/9

Solving for critical points So far, we have that l = w. Plugging this into the first equation 35 2lw l 2 = 0, we get 35 2l 2 l 2 = 0 Or, l 2 = 35 3 Or, again noting the l must be positive: l = ( 35 3 ) 1 2 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.7/9

Solving for critical points So far, we have that l = w. Plugging this into the first equation 35 2lw l 2 = 0, we get 35 2l 2 l 2 = 0 Or, Or, again noting the l must be positive: l 2 = 35 3 l = ( 35 3 ) 1 2 Putting this together with the fact that w = l and h = 35 lw, we have that the only l+w critical point in our domain is ( ) 1 ( ) 1 35 2 35 2 35 ( ) 35,, 3 3 3 2 ( ) 1 = 35 2 3 ( ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ) 35 2 35 2 35 2,, 3 3 3 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.7/9

Finding the absolute maximum The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions. Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.8/9

Finding the absolute maximum The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions. Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is V = ( ( ) 1 ) 3 35 2 3 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.8/9

Finding the absolute maximum The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions. Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is V = ( ( ) 1 ) 3 35 2 3 The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not? Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.8/9

Finding the absolute maximum The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions. Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is V = ( ( ) 1 ) 3 35 2 3 The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not? To answer this we make two observations: Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.8/9

Finding the absolute maximum The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions. Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is V = ( ( ) 1 ) 3 35 2 3 The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not? To answer this we make two observations: For a fixed l (say l = 1), we have h = 35 w 1+w the volume tends to zero.. As w 0, we see that h 35 and Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.8/9

Finding the absolute maximum The boundary of our domain are the lines l = 0 and w = 0 for l, w 0. Noticing that on these lines, the volume and the surface area must be zero, we can ignore these as physically unreasonable solutions. Thus our critical point is the only test point. The Volume at this point is V = ( ( ) 1 ) 3 35 2 3 The only remaining question is, is this a maximum or not? To answer this we make two observations: For a fixed l (say l = 1), we have h = 35 w 1+w the volume tends to zero.. As w 0, we see that h 35 and As l and w tend towards, we see that h eventually becomes negative, an unreasonable physical assumption. Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.8/9

Conclusion We conclude that the critical point is a maximum. Thus the absolute maximum volume occurs at the point ( ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ) 35 2 35 2 35 2,, 3 3 3 where the volume is ( 35 ) 3 2 3 Maximizing volume given a surface area constraint p.9/9