FEBRUARY 2016 THE INTERNATIONAL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION FEDERATION LIMITED

Similar documents
OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS: 2009

Review: Oil Spills. April 30, 2010

Statistical analysis Alerts and accidents database

A Contribution to the Analysis of Maritime Accidents with Catastrophic Consequence

Analysis of the Maritime Safety Regime: Risk Improvement Possibilities for the Port State Control Target Factor (Paris MoU)

A method for assessing the risk of sea transportation: Numerical examples for the Oslofjord

Defense and settlement costs associated with litigation brought against owners of commodities.

Crude Oil Trading Patterns: Trends and Tonne Mile Assessments

ANALYSIS OF OIL SPILL TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES AND WORLDWIDE

Management of Marine Environment ENVS 590. Instructor Dr. Assad A. Al-Thukair

The HNS Compensation Regime. Regional workshop on the 2010 HNS Convention Rome, Italy 10 October 2014 Jose Maura Director

Shipping, World Trade and the Reduction of

Pilot on the Bridge Role, Authority and Responsibility. Necessity of Bridge Team Management.

International Conference on Applied Sciences and the Environment ASE 98, Cadiz, Spain, September 1998.

K.M. Dastur Reinsurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd.

Shipping, World Trade and the Reduction of

Current Status of Hebei Spirit

Shipping, World Trade and the Reduction of

Hydrostatically Balanced Loading

Fee tariff for services of Port of Gdansk Authority SA

The world merchant fleet in Statistics from Equasis

Pollution Response RESPONDING TO AN OIL SPILL

People with energy. Adding value right across the supply chain

THE ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE SHIP AGENT IN THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT CHAIN

2015 PCS CATASTROPHE CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION LIABILITY CLAIMS

Maritime Accidents and Human Performance: the Statistical Trail

Islands Trust Council Concerns: Oil Spill Response & Oil Tanker Expansion

Global Marine Insurance Report 2008

Technical Sub Report 8 Maritime Oil Spill Risk Analysis

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Oil Spill Emergency Response. Oil Spill Emergency

CURRICULUM VITAE. PROFESSIONAL Department of Trade, 1st Class Marine Engineer s Certificate (Motor)

A Review of Double Hull Tanker Oil Spill Prevention Considerations

CEYHAN MARINE TERMINAL BALLAST WATER RISK ASSESSMENT. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey MRC - Emrah Ali Pekdemir

EEOI Monitoring Tool. User s Manual

Analysis of U.S. Oil Spillage API PUBLICATION 356 AUGUST 2009

Shipping and World Trade

THE SEA EMPRESS OIL SPILL IN CONTEXT

Cleaning Oil Spills. Table 1: Some examples of oil spills

Tankers Fueling American Life

International Chamber of Shipping

Energy Efficiency of Ships: what are we talking about?

THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE REMOVAL OF WRECKS MAY 2015

LNG SAFETY MYTHS and LEGENDS

Worldwide Analysis of Marine Oil Spill Cleanup Cost Factors

Shipping, World Trade and the Reduction of CO 2 Emissions

Statistical Summary Marine Occurrences 2013

Oil Spill Preparedness and Response: The Singapore Experience

Overview of pipelines in Europe advantages and disadvantages

2016 MAY. The brochure.

Oil Spill Risk in Industry Sectors Regulated by Washington State Department of Ecology Spills Program For Oil Spill Prevention and Preparedness

Curriculum Vitae SAN FRANCISCO, USA, RESIDENT SURVEYOR. British Subject and USA permanent resident

Insurance Report. Vice chairman IUMI Facts and Figures Committee Cefor, The Nordic Association of Marine Insurers

THE LEADING ROLE OF THE HELLENIC MERCHANT SHIPPING

III International Maritime Congress

FULLY COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE GUARANTEE, COVER AND SCOPE

Discharge of Water & Waste from Marine Vessels Standards & Regulations (MARPOL Convention)

Horn of Africa: Threat Factors for Commercial Shipping and Forecast of Pirate Activity Through 2009

Maritime Accident Review 2007

OUR CONVERSATION TODAY

PT. TRI MARINA GLOBALNUSA - BROCHURE

INLAND WATERS OIL SPILL RESPONSE

SHIPPING MARINEOFFSHORE MALAYSIA OIL & GAS PORTS &HARBOURS DISPUTES FOREIGN JUDGMENT INSURANCE ENFORCEMENT ARREST

Stephen Mills. Appropriately hands-on without being overpowering. he worked tirelessly to achieve a settlement

"HNS and the general regulatory framework for pollution liability in Europe"

PARTNERSHIP IN OCEAN FREIGHT

Protection & Indemnity Insurance 2016/2017 Part 2 final

LNG. a natural gas partner

Oil Pollution and International Marine Environmental Law

LNG Poised to Significantly Increase its Share of Global Gas Market David Wood February 2004 Petroleum Review p.38-39

Audit of Port Marine Safety Code compliance

JAMES WILSON Mediator Profile

The Role of a Lead Marine Insurance Market in the Maritime Cluster

SERVICE AND COMPETENCE YOU CAN RELY ON P&I AND FD&D AND TRADERS CHARTERERS

Standard P&I Cover. Responds to the Assured`s legal liabilities in direct connection with the operation of the ship

Risk Consulting. At a Glance

ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) FOR PRINOS OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ANNEX 15: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Merchant Shipping (Port State Control) Regulations 2011

Republic of Turkey - Ministry of Economy,

accidents at sea REPORT Introduction SUMMARY 2013 General cargo vessels account for nearly 50% of all vessel types lost at sea

Integrated Emergency Management and the Prior Notification of the Transportation of Radioactive Material

Legal background paper: Environmental Regulation of Oil Rigs in EU Waters and Potential Accidents

Law Relating to the Prevention of Marine Pollution and Maritime Disaster

MARINE INSURANCE. F.O.R. (Free on Rail) This is same as F.O.B. but it concerns mainly the internal trade transactions.

Making Secondary mathematics sustainable

The world merchant fleet in Statistics from Equasis

Module No. # 02. Impact of oil and gas industry on marine environment

PROTECTION & INDEMNITY INSURANCE

Building on +60 GW of experience. Track record as of 31 December 2013

FRANCE NATIONAL ORGANISATION

Marine surveys Services and solutions

Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty Hull and Machinery Insurance

Why infrastructure is so important

Tankers and Bulkers 10,000 GT and above

MARINE INSURANCE GUIDELINES

For the PNTL Fleet, which are all purpose built vessels, certified to INF3 classification [3] such prevention measure include the following:

Exhaust Emissions from Ship Engines in Australian Waters Including Ports

Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs) and Marine Environmentally High Risk Areas (MEHRAs)

MARINE HULL GLOBAL TRADING LIMITS

Marine Accidents SØULYKKESRAPPORT FRA OPKLARINGSENHEDEN

Transcription:

FEBRUARY 216 THE INTERNATIONAL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION FEDERATION LIMITED OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS 215

Background ITOPF maintains a database of oil spills from tankers, combined carriers and barges. This contains information on accidental spillages of persistent and non-persistent oil since 197, except those resulting from acts of war. The data held includes the type of oil spilt, the spill amount, the cause and location of the incident and the vessel involved. For historical reasons, spills are generally categorised by size, <7 tonnes, 7 7 tonnes and >7 tonnes (<5 bbls, 5 5, bbls, >5, bbls), although the actual amount spilt is also recorded. Information is now held on over 1, incidents, the vast majority of which (81%) fall into the smallest category i.e. <7 tonnes. Information is gathered from both published sources, such as the shipping press and other specialist publications, as well as from vessel owners, their insurers and from ITOPF s own experience at incidents. Unsurprisingly, information from published sources generally relates to large spills, often resulting from collisions, groundings, structural damage, fires or explosions, whereas the majority of individual reports relate to small, operational spillages. Reliable reporting of this latter category of spill is often difficult to achieve. It should be noted that the figures for the amount of oil spilt in an incident include all oil lost to the environment, including that which burnt or remained in a sunken vessel. There is considerable annual variation in both the incidence of oil spills and the amounts of oil lost. While we strive to maintain precise records for all spill information, we cannot guarantee that the information taken from the shipping press and other sources is complete or accurate. The number of incidents and volumes of oil spilt are based on the most up to date information. From time to time, data is received after publication and, in which case, adjustment to previous entries may be made. Consequently, the figures in the following tables, and any averages derived from them, should be viewed with an element of caution. Major Oil Spills brief summary of the top 2 major spills that A have occurred since the TORREY CANYON in 1967 is given in Table 1 and the locations are shown in Figure 1; it is of note that 19 of the 2 largest spills recorded occurred before the year 2. A number of these incidents, despite their large size, caused little or no environmental damage as the oil was spilt some distance offshore and did not impact coastlines. It is for this reason that some of the names listed may be unfamiliar. EXXON VALDEZ and HEBEI SPIRIT are included for comparison although these incidents fall some way outside the group. Position Shipname Year Location Spill size (tonnes) 1 ATLANTIC EMPRESS 1979 Off Tobago, West Indies 287, 2 ABT SUMMER 1991 7 nautical miles off Angola 26, 3 CASTILLO DE BELLVER 1983 Off Saldanha Bay, South Africa 252, 4 AMOCO CADIZ 1978 Off Brittany, France 223, 5 HAVEN 1991 Genoa, Italy 144, 6 ODYSSEY 1988 7 nautical miles off Nova Scotia, Canada 132, 7 TORREY CANYON 1967 Scilly Isles, UK 119, 8 SEA STAR 1972 Gulf of Oman 115, 9 IRENES SERENADE 198 Navarino Bay, Greece 1, 1 URQUIOLA 1976 La Coruna, Spain 1, 11 HAWAIIAN PATRIOT 1977 3 nautical miles off Honolulu 95, 12 INDEPENDENTA 1979 Bosphorus, Turkey 94, 13 JAKOB MAERSK 1975 Oporto, Portugal 88, 14 BRAER 1993 Shetland Islands, UK 85, 15 AEGEAN SEA 1992 La Coruna, Spain 74, 16 SEA EMPRESS 1996 Milford Haven, UK 72, 17 KHARK 5 1989 12 nautical miles off Atlantic coast of Morocco 7, 18 NOVA 1985 Off Kharg Island, Gulf of Iran 7, 19 KATINA P 1992 Off Maputo, Mozambique 67, 2 PRESTIGE 22 Off Galicia, Spain 63, 35 EXXON VALDEZ 1989 Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA 37, 131 HEBEI SPIRIT 27 Taean, Republic of Korea 11, Table 1: Major oil spills since 1967 (quantities have been rounded to nearest thousand) 2 2 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS

EXXON VALDEZ TORREY CANYON AMOCO CADIZ ODYSSEY AEGEAN SEA URQUIOLA PRESTIGE JAKOB MAERSK KHARK 5 BRAER SEA EMPRESS HAVEN INDEPENDENTA IRENES SERENADE SEA STAR HEBEI SPIRIT HAWAIIAN PATRIOT ATLANTIC EMPRESS NOVA ABT SUMMER CASTILLO DE BELLVER KATINA P. Background Source: National Geographic Society, i-cubed All rights reserved (c) ITOPF Figure 1: Location of major spills Number of Incidents and Quantity Spilt Copyright: 213 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 2s 32 incidents 7% 199s 77 incidents 17% 198s 94 incidents 21% 197s 245 incidents 55% Figure 2: Large spills (>7 tonnes) as a percentage of those recorded from 197 to 29 per decade OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS 3

Number of Oil Spills The incidence of large spills (>7 tonnes) is relatively low and detailed statistical analysis is rarely possible, consequently emphasis is placed on identifying trends. Thus, it is apparent from Table 2 that the number of large spills has decreased significantly in the last 46 years during which records have been kept. Over the last three and half decades, the average number of spills greater than 7 tonnes has progressively reduced and since 21 stands at an average of 1.8 per year. Looking at this downward trend from another perspective, 55% of the large spills recorded occurred in the 197s, and this percentage has decreased each decade (Figure 2). A decline can also be observed with medium sized spills (7-7 tonnes) in Figure 4 and Table 2. Here, the average number of spills per year in the 199s was 28.1, reducing to 14.9 in the 2s and is currently 5.2 for the 21s (not a complete decade). Year 7 7 Tonnes >7 Tonnes 197 7 29 1971 18 14 1972 48 27 1973 28 31 1974 9 27 1975 96 2 1976 67 26 1977 7 16 1978 59 23 1979 6 32 Total 543 245 Average 54.3 24.5 Year 7 7 Tonnes >7 Tonnes 198 52 13 1981 54 7 1982 46 4 1983 52 13 1984 26 8 1985 33 8 1986 27 7 1987 27 11 1988 11 1 1989 32 13 Total 36 94 Average 36 9.4 Table 2: Annual number of oil spills (>7 tonnes) We have recorded two large spills for 215; both releases of oil occurred as a result of a collision. The first occurred in Singapore in January and resulted in a spill of approximately 4,5 tonnes of crude oil; the second occurred in Turkey in June and resulted in a spill of approximately 1,4 tonnes of naphtha. Six medium spills of various oils were also recorded for 215 including cargoes of asphalt, naphtha and slurry oil, as well as bunker fuels. Whilst this is slightly higher than the average for this decade it is still far below the averages for previous decades. (Figure 3 and Table 2). Year 7 7 Tonnes >7 Tonnes 199 5 14 1991 3 7 1992 31 1 1993 31 11 1994 26 9 1995 2 3 1996 2 3 1997 28 1 1998 25 5 1999 2 5 Total 281 77 Average 28.1 7.7 Year 7 7 Tonnes >7 Tonnes 2 21 4 21 18 3 22 11 3 23 19 4 24 2 5 25 22 3 26 12 4 27 12 3 28 7 1 29 7 2 Total 149 32 Average 14.9 3.2 Year 7 7 Tonnes >7 Tonnes 21 5 4 211 4 1 212 7 213 5 3 214 4 1 215 6 2 Total 31 11 Average 5.2 1.8 4 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS

35 197-79: 24.5 spills per year on average 3 25 Number of spills 2 15 1 198-89: 9.4 spills per year on average 199-99: 7.7 spills per year on average 2-9: 3.2 spills per year on average 21-15: 1.8 spills per year on average 5 197 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2 23 26 29 212 215 Figure 3: Number of large spills (>7 tonnes) from 197 to 215 6 5 Number of spills 4 3 2 7-7 Tonnes >7 Tonnes 1 197s 198s 199s 2s 21s Figure 4: Number of medium (7 7 tonnes) and large (>7 tonnes) spills per decade from 197 to 215* * Only 6 years of data for the period 21 215 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS 5

Quantities of Oil Spilt The vast majority of spills are small (i.e. less than 7 tonnes) and data on the numbers of incidents and quantity of oil spilt is incomplete due to the inconsistent reporting of smaller incidents worldwide. Reports on spills of 7 tonnes and above tend to be more reliable and information from these is included in the database to give a series of annual estimates of the total quantity spilt for the years 197-215. These quantities are rounded to the nearest thousand. Inconsistencies may occur between the sums of each year and the totals. However, all percentages and averages have been calculated using unrounded figures. Approximately 5.72 million tonnes of oil were lost as a result of tanker incidents from 197 to 215. However, as Figures 5 and 6 indicate, the volume of oil spilt from tankers demonstrates a significant reduction through the decades. From Table 3 it is interesting to observe that an amount greater than the total quantity of oil spilt in the decade 2 to 29 (196, tonnes) was spilt in 197s 56% 198s 21% 199s 2% several single years in earlier decades. 2s 3% Figure 5: Oil spilt per decade as a percentage of the total spilt between 197 and 29 The total volume of oil lost to the environment recorded in 215 was approximately 7, tonnes, the vast majority of which can be attributed to the two large spills (>7 tonnes) recorded in January and June (Table 3 and Figure 6). Year Quantity (Tonnes) 197 383, 1971 144, 1972 313, 1973 159, 1974 173, 1975 351, 1976 364, 1977 276, 1978 393, 1979 636, Total 3,192, Year Quantity (Tonnes) 199 61, 1991 431, 1992 167, 1993 14, 1994 13, 1995 12, 1996 8, 1997 72, 1998 13, 1999 28, Total 1,133, Year Quantity (Tonnes) 21 12, 211 2, 212 1, 213 7, 214 4, 215 7, Total 33, Year Quantity (Tonnes) 198 26, 1981 48, 1982 12, 1983 384, 1984 29, 1985 85, 1986 19, 1987 38, 1988 19, 1989 164, Total 1,174, Year Quantity (Tonnes) 2 14, 21 9, 22 66, 23 43, 24 17, 25 15, 26 12, 27 15, 28 2, 29 3, Total 196, Table 3: Annual quantity of oil spilt 6 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS

7 6 ATLANTIC EMPRESS 287, Tonnes ABT SUMMER 26, Tonnes 5 CASTILLO DE BELLVER 252, Tonnes Thousand tonnes 4 3 KHARK 5 7, Tonnes EXXON VALDEZ 37, Tonnes SEA EMPRESS 72, Tonnes PRESTIGE 63, Tonnes 2 ERIKA 2, Tonnes HEBEI SPIRIT 11, Tonnes 1 197 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2 23 26 29 212 215 Figure 6: Quantities of oil spilt 7 tonnes and over (rounded to nearest thousand), 197 to 215 Large Spills As demonstrated in Figures 6 and 7, when looking at the frequency and quantities of oil spilt, it should be noted that a few very large spills are responsible for a high percentage of oil spilt. For example, in more recent decades the following can be seen: In the 199s there were 358 spills of 7 tonnes and over, resulting in 1,133, tonnes of oil lost; 73% of this amount was spilt in just 1 incidents. In the 2s there were 181 spills of 7 tonnes and over, resulting in 196, tonnes of oil lost; 75% of this amount was spilt in just 1 incidents. In the six year period 21-215 there have been 42 spills of 7 tonnes and over, resulting in 33, tonnes of oil lost; 86% of this amount was spilt in just 1 incidents. In terms of the volume of oil spilt the figures for a particular year may be severely distorted by a single large incident. This is clearly illustrated by incidents such as ATLANTIC EMPRESS (1979), 287, tonnes spilt; CASTILLO DE BELLVER (1983), 252, tonnes spilt and ABT SUMMER (1991), 26, tonnes spilt (Figure 6). 3.5 3 Million tonnes of oil spilt 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 49% from 2 incidents 51% from 768 incidents 71% from 1 incidents 29% from 444 incidents 73% from 1 incidents 27% from 348 incidents 75% from 1 incidents 25% from 171 incidents 197s 198s 199s 2s Figure 7: Spills 7 tonnes and over per decade showing the influence of a relatively small number of comparatively large spills on the overall figure OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS 7

Seaborne Oil Trade Apart from a fall in the early 198s during the worldwide economic recession, seaborne oil trade has grown steadily from 197 (Figure 8). While increased movements might imply increased risk, it is encouraging to observe however that downward trends in oil spills continue despite an overall increase in oil trading over the period. Billion tonne-miles 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, No. of spills 7 tonnes and over 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 197 1974 1978 1982 1986 199 1994 1998 22 26 21 214 Seaborne oil trade (Billion tonne-miles) No. of spills 7 tonnes and over [Source: Fearnresearch 197-1989, Lloyds List Intelligence 199-214] Figure 8: Seaborne oil trade and number of tanker spills 7 tonnes and over, 197 to 214 (Crude and Oil Product *) Causes of Spills The causes and circumstances of oil spills are varied, but can have a significant effect on the final quantity spilt. The following analysis explores the incidence of spills of different sizes in terms of the operation that the vessel was undertaking at the time of the incident and the primary cause of the spill. For small and medium sized spills, operations have been grouped into Loading/ Discharging, Bunkering, Other Operations and Unknown Operations. Other Operations includes activities such as ballasting, de-ballasting, tank cleaning and when the vessel is underway. Reporting of larger spills tends to provide more information and greater accuracy, which has allowed further breakdown of vessel operations. Therefore, operations for larger spills have been grouped into Loading/Discharging, Bunkering, At Anchor (Inland/ Restricted waters), At Anchor (Open water), Underway (Open water), Underway (Inland/Restricted waters), Other Operations and Unknown Operations. The primary causes have been designated to Allisions/ Collisions, Groundings, Hull Failures, Equipment Failures, Fire and Explosion, and Other/Unknown. Other causes include events such as heavy weather damage and human error. Spills where the relevant information is not available have been designated as Unknown. Small and medium sized spills account for 95% of all the incidents recorded; a large percentage of these spills, 4% and 29% respectively, occurred during * Product vessels of 6, DWT and above. Barges excluded. loading and discharging operations which normally take place in ports and oil terminals (Figures 9 and 12). While the cause of these spills is largely unknown it can be seen that equipment and hull failures account for approximately 46% of these incidents for both size categories (Figures 11 and 14). Nevertheless, when considering Other Operations there is a significant difference in the percentage of allisions, collisions and groundings between these two size groups where we see the percentage increasing from 2% for smaller spills to 47% for medium spills (Figures 11 and 14). Large spills account for the remaining 5% of all the incidents recorded and the occurrence of these incidents has significantly decreased over the past 46 years. From Figure 15, it can be seen that 5% of large spills occurred while the vessels were underway in open water; allisions, collisions and groundings accounted for 59% of the causes for these spills (Figure 17). These same causes account for an even higher percentage of incidents when the vessel was underway in inland or restricted waters, being linked to some 99% of spills. Restricted waters include incidents that occurred in ports and harbours. Perhaps unsurprisingly, activities during loading or discharging result in significantly more small or medium sized spills than large spills. However, large spills do still occur during loading and discharging, and from Figure 17 and Table 6, it can be seen that 57% of these incidents are caused by fires, explosions and equipment failures. 8 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS

UNKNOWN 36% LOADING/ DISCHARGING 4% OTHER/UNKNOWN 64% FIRE/EXPLOSION 2% ALLISION/ COLLISION 2% GROUNDING 3% OTHER OPERATIONS 17% BUNKERING 7% EQUIPMENT FAILURE 21% HULL FAILURE 7% Figure 9: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by operation at time of incident, 1974 215 Figure 1: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by cause, 1974 215 1 9 8 Allision/Collision 7 Grounding Cause of spill (%) 6 5 4 Hull Failure Equipment Failure 3 Fire/Explosion 2 1 Other/Unknown Loading/ Discharging Bunkering Other operations Unknown Figure 11: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1974 215 Loading/ Discharging Bunkering Operations Other Operations Unknown Total 3,17 574 1,286 2,844 7,874 Causes Allision/Collision 3 2 15 168 188 Grounding 2 15 223 24 Hull Failure 325 1 47 195 577 Equipment Failure 1,13 18 251 23 1,692 Fire/Explosion 5 5 36 83 174 Other 842 291 518 164 1,815 Unknown 818 158 44 1,88 3,188 Total 3,17 574 1,286 2,844 7,874 Table 4: Incidence of spills <7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 1974 215 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS 9

UNKNOWN 56% LOADING/ DISCHARGING 29% HULL FAILURE 7% EQUIPMENT FAILURE 15% FIRE/EXPLOSION 3% OTHER/UNKNOWN 28% OTHER OPERATIONS 13% BUNKERING 2% GROUNDING 2% ALLISION/COLLISION 27% Figure 12: Incidence of spills 7 7 tonnes by operation at time of incident, 197 215 Figure 13: Incidence of spills 7 7 tonnes by cause, 197 215 1 9 Allision/Collision 8 7 Grounding Cause of spill (%) 6 5 4 3 Hull Failure Equipment Failure Fire/Explosion 2 1 Other/Unknown Loading/ Discharging Bunkering Other operations Unknown Figure 14: Incidence of spills 7 7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 197 215 Loading/ Discharging Bunkering Operations Other Operations Unknown Total 393 32 178 761 1,364 Causes Allision/Collision 5 57 299 361 Grounding 26 244 27 Hull Failure 37 4 15 45 11 Equipment Failure 145 6 17 39 27 Fire/Explosion 9 13 25 47 Other 98 13 36 28 175 Unknown 99 9 14 81 23 Total 393 32 178 761 1,364 Table 5: Incidence of spills 7 7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 197 215 2 1 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS

UNDERWAY (Open Water) 5% FIRE/EXPLOSION 11% OTHER/UNKNOWN 9% ALLISION/ COLLISION 3% EQUIPMENT FAILURE 4% UNDERWAY (Inland/Restricted) 17% AT ANCHOR (Open Water) 2% AT ANCHOR (Inland/Restricted) 3% LOADING/ DISCHARGING 9% BUNKERING <1% OTHER/ UNKNOWN 18% HULL FAILURE 13% GROUNDING 33% Figure 15: Incidence of spills >7 tonnes by operation at time of incident, 197 215 Figure 16: Incidence of spills >7 tonnes by cause, 197 215 1 9 Allision/Collision 8 7 Grounding Cause of spill (%) 6 5 4 3 2 Hull failure Equipment Failure Fire/Explosion 1 Other/Unknown At anchor (Inland/ Restricted) At anchor (Open Water) Underway (Inland/ Restricted) Underway (Open Water) Loading/ Discharging Other operations/ Unknown Figure 17: Incidence of spills >7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 197 215 At Anchor (Inland/ Restricted) At Anchor (Open Water) Underway (Inland/ Restricted) Underway (Open Water) Operations Loading/ Discharging Bunkering Other Operations/ Unknown 16 9 81 229 42 1 81 459 Causes Allision/Collision 6 5 34 66 2 23 136 Grounding 5 1 46 68 2 28 15 Hull Failure 2 1 49 8 6 Equipment Failure 6 11 1 18 Fire/Explosion 2 2 1 25 13 1 8 52 Other 1 14 8 7 3 Unknown 1 6 6 13 Total 16 9 81 229 42 1 81 459 Total Table 6: Incidence of spills >7 tonnes by operation at time of incident and primary cause of spill, 197 215 OIL TANKER SPILL STATISTICS 11

216 ITOPF Ltd. Produced by Impact PR & Design Limited, Canterbury, UK ITOPF is a not-for-profit organisation established on behalf of the world s shipowners and their insurers to promote effective response to marine spills of oil, chemicals and other hazardous substances. Technical services include emergency response, advice on clean-up techniques, pollution damage assessment, assistance with spill response planning and the provision of training. ITOPF is a source of comprehensive information on marine pollution and this paper is one of a series of publications available. Information in this paper may be reproduced with the prior express permission of ITOPF. For further information please contact: THE INTERNATIONAL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION FEDERATION LIMITED 1 Oliver s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1HQ, United Kingdom Tel: +44 ()2 7566 6999 E-mail: central@itopf.com Fax: +44 ()2 7566 695 Web: www.itopf.com 24hr: +44 ()7623 984 66 +44 ()2 7566 6998