JCSG-plus TM HT-96 Green Screen



Similar documents
MD1-46 is presented as 96 x 10 ml conditions.

MD1-46 is presented as 96 x 10 ml conditions.

It's in the details. JOST MINERAL GUIDE

Problem Solving. Percentage Composition

Human Tubal Fluid (HTF) Media & Modifi ed Human Tubal Fluid (mhtf) Medium with Gentamicin

Standard Operating Procedure for Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Lachat Method)

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. HIS-Select Nickel Affinity Gel. Catalog Number P6611 Storage Temperature 2 8 C

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay Kit. Catalog Numbers BCA1 AND B9643

Art.Nr. Product group English Pack CasNr CL General reagent Acetic acid 80% p. 5 l CL General reagent Acetic acid 80%

Solutions: Molarity. A. Introduction

Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Capsules

List of Analytical Reagents(AR)

Calculation of Molar Masses. Molar Mass. Solutions. Solutions

ION EXCHANGE FOR DUMMIES. An introduction

Chemistry 201. Practical aspects of buffers. NC State University. Lecture 15

ALS TRIBOLOGY Engine Coolant Reference Guide

ab FITC Conjugation Kit Protocol

Malachite Green Phosphate Assay Kit

Chapter 16: Tests for ions and gases

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

Molarity of Ions in Solution

Tutorial 4 SOLUTION STOICHIOMETRY. Solution stoichiometry calculations involve chemical reactions taking place in solution.

1. Read P , P & P ; P. 375 # 1-11 & P. 389 # 1,7,9,12,15; P. 436 #1, 7, 8, 11

Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay

MLX BCG Buccal Cell Genomic DNA Extraction Kit. Performance Characteristics

Lead Testing and On Site Calibration for Water Testing Detection Range: 2 100ppb

ProteoMiner Protein Enrichment Kits

Reagents, Buffers, and Indicators

JBS FUNDAMENT Thermofluor Screen

3 The Preparation of Buffers at Desired ph

Preparation of frequently used solutions

Balancing Chemical Equations Worksheet

BUFFERS and MEDIAS Coomassie Blue Staining Solution Coomassie blue Destaining Solution DMEM Normal Cell Culture Media

Stoichiometry. Can You Make 2.00 Grams of a Compound?

Dispelling the Myths of Heat Transfer Fluids. Kevin Connor The Dow Chemical Company

ArC Amine Reactive Compensation Bead Kit

Product list Magnesium, Calcium and further mineral compounds

Aquagent. Pyridine-free volumetric Karl Fischer reagents

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Corning Spin-X UF Concentrator Selection and Use Guide

PECTINS. SYNONYMS INS No. 440 DEFINITION DESCRIPTION. FUNCTIONAL USES Gelling agent, thickener, stabilizer, emulsifier CHARACTERISTICS

CHEMICAL NAMES AND FORMULAS

Formulas, Equations and Moles

HOMEWORK 4A. Definitions. Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Questions

Genomic DNA Clean & Concentrator Catalog Nos. D4010 & D4011

There is a simple equation for calculating dilutions. It is also easy to present the logic of the equation.

Number of moles of solute = Concentration (mol. L ) x Volume of solution (litres) or n = C x V

Extraction of Cannabinoids in Marijuana and Edibles by QuEChERS

General Chemistry Lab Experiment 6 Types of Chemical Reaction

Innovative Removal of Agricultural Related Water Pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Chapter 5, Lesson 3 Why Does Water Dissolve Salt?

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

IC Food Packs. Complete packs for food analysis. Free with every IC Food Pack: MagIC Net software Ultrafiltration

NALCO WT-1000 Closed System Corrosion Inhibitor

Identification of Unknown Organic Compounds

W1 WORKSHOP ON STOICHIOMETRY

WRITING CHEMICAL FORMULA

Complexometric Titrations

MANAGEMENT & DISPOSAL OF QIAGEN REAGENTS

Western Blotting. USA: UK & Europe: europe@ptglab.com China: service@ptglab.com.

Name: Class: Date: 2 4 (aq)

5.0 EXPERIMENT ON DETERMINATION OF TOTAL HARDNESS

HOW TO MAKE STANDARD SOLUTIONS FOR CHEMISTRY

Protein Interaction Analysis

Santa Monica College Chemistry 11

neutrons are present?

Quantitation of Peptides and Amino Acids with a Synergy HT using UV Fluorescence

Technical Spotlight. The Use of Ion Chromatography in the Printed Circuit Board Industry

BASANT S SCIENCE ACADEMY CLASS-X SUB- CHEMISTRY CHAPTER- ACID, BASE & SALT-NOTE

SCH 4C1 Unit 2 Problem Set Questions taken from Frank Mustoe et all, "Chemistry 11", McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2001

Experiment 5. Chemical Reactions A + X AX AX A + X A + BX AX + B AZ + BX AX + BZ

Unit 2: Quantities in Chemistry

Q.1 Classify the following according to Lewis theory and Brønsted-Lowry theory.

DNA SPOOLING 1 ISOLATION OF DNA FROM ONION

Calculating Molar Mass of a Compound

EZ-Run Protein Gel Solution. EZ-Run Protein Standards. EZ-Run Gel Staining Solution. Traditional SDS-Page Reagents. Protein Electrophoresis

Ürün Kodu Açıklaması Amb

ACID-BASE TITRATIONS: DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE BY TITRATION WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID BACKGROUND

Nomenclature of Ionic Compounds

Chapter 5. Chapter 5. Naming Ionic Compounds. Objectives. Chapter 5. Chapter 5

CHEMICAL NAMES AND FORMULAS

POROS CaptureSelect affinity columns for highspeed quantification of IgG Fc fusion proteins

TOTAL PROTEIN FIBRINOGEN

DRAFT. Made under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act CONSULTATION DRAFT 7 July 2014

Science 20. Unit A: Chemical Change. Assignment Booklet A1

Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate)

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds DOC

Aurum Ion Exchange Mini Kits and Columns. Instruction Manual

EXPERIMENT # 3 ELECTROLYTES AND NON-ELECTROLYTES

Experiment 16-Acids, Bases and ph

Q.1 Classify the following according to Lewis theory and Brønsted-Lowry theory.

Elements and Compounds. Chemical Bonds compounds are made of atoms held together by chemical bonds bonds are forces of attraction between atoms

Watertreatment and primary care. BALLING Light. Calcium, Magnesium, Alkalinity +Trace Elements.

NORKOOL Industrial Coolants

Affi-Prep Protein A Matrix Instruction Manual

STANDARD FOR EDIBLE CASEIN PRODUCTS CODEX STAN Formerly CODEX STAN A Adopted in Revision Amendments 2010, 2013, 2014.

GCSE Chemistry. Making Salts Instructions and answers for teachers

Guidance Note: Chemical Storage

Transcription:

JCSG-plus TM HT-96 Green Screen MD1-53 JCSG-plus Green Screen is a 96 reagent, optimized sparse-matrix screen of classic and modern conditions, with our fluorescent dye added for superb UV performance devised at the Joint Centre for Structural Genomics and developed further by Newman and Perrakis at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. MD1-53 contains 96 x 1.1 ml reagents in a deep well block. Analysis of precipitants used in JCSG-plus Features of JCSG-plus Green Screen Optimized sparse-matrix screen. Reduced redundancy. Screens classic PEG and salt conditions. Access more areas of crystallization space Neutralized organic acids: Formate, acetate, citrate, succinate, malate, malonate. More organic and polyalcohol conditions. Precipitant synergy. Wide ph range 4.0 10.0. Introduction Commercially available sparse matrix screens are devised using conditions based on previously successful crystallization conditions. Since increasing numbers of researchers now use commercially available sparse matrix screens, the same sub-sets of conditions are used repeatedly. A number of structural genomics initiatives have published results of data-mining exercises using internally consistent datasets and analysing negative results as well as positive hits. The results have been startling! Members of the Joint Centre for Structural Genomics analysed the crystallization of over 500 different proteins against commercially available sparse matrix screens totalling 480 conditions, compiled to sample a wide range of precipitant, buffer, additive and ph. The core screen (JCSG) was developed when data mining revealed massive redundancy between clusters of conditions in commercial screens, particularly where high molecular weight PEGs are used as precipitants (1). Using a novel algorithm, members of the JCSG identified conditions most essential for promoting crystal formation for the most diverse set of proteins 1 # conditions 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 count 200 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 300 400 1000 1500 2000 MME 3000 salt carboxylate polyalcohol organic low MW PEG medmw PEG himw PEG 3350 4000 PEG molecular weight 6000 8000 <5 <6 <7 <8 <9 <10 <11 ph bins n = 53 10000 20000

In-filling the optimized screen The second issue to come to light was that even extensive suites of sparse matrix screens represent incomplete coverage of crystallisation space 480 conditions failed to crystallise 15% of the target proteins. The JCSG-plus screen is supplemented with additional conditions to provide a more complete coverage of crystallisation space and improved chemical complementarity (2). i. In-filling the ph profile ii. introduce conditions using neutralised organic acids as the precipitant (3) iii. expanded range of organic and polyalcohol conditions iv. precipitant synergy Usage JCSG-plus is designed for the rapid, efficient screening for crystallization leads of a new protein or preparation. In the first instance, drops should be set-up using equal volumes of protein solution and reagent. Protein samples should be in a minimal solvent system containing a low concentration of buffer. Starting protein concentrations should be between 5 mg/ml and 40 mg/ml. Protein concentration can be varied in subsequent rounds depending on initial results. The conditions in JCSG-plus are compatible with all commonly used crystallisation methods, sitting drop, hanging drop, sandwich drop, microbatch, vapour microbatch and microdialysis. The JCSG-plus sparse matrix screen is highly effective when used alongside a systematic screen such as PACT-premier. The two screens provide a thorough exploration of crystallization conditions and the unique design of PACT-premier facilitates rational interpretation of results from both itself and JCSG-plus assisting the design of subsequent experiments. Formulation Notes: JCSG-plus reagents are formulated using ultrapure water (>18.0 MΩ) and are sterile-filtered using 0.22 μm filters. No preservatives are added. 50% Stock solutions of Jeffamine are adjusted to ph 7.0 using HCl prior to inclusion in the reagents. Final ph may vary from that specified on the datasheet. Molecular Dimensions will be happy to discuss the precise formulation of individual reagents. Individual reagents and stock solutions for optimization are available from Molecular Dimensions. Enquiries regarding JCSG-plus formulation, interpretation of results or optimization strategies are welcome. Please e-mail, fax or phone your query to Molecular Dimensions. Contact and product details can be found at www.moleculardimensions.com References. 1. Page et al (2003). Shotgun crystallization strategy for structural genomics: an optimized two-tiered crystallization screen against the Thermotoga maritima proteome. Acta Cryst. D59, 1028-1037 2. Newman et al (2005). Towards rationalization of crystallization screening for small- to medium-sized academic laboratories: the PACT/JCSG+ strategy. Acta Cryst. D61, 1426-1431 3. McPherson et al (2001). A comparison of salts for the crystallisation of macromolecules, Protein Science 10, 418422 4. Crystallization of Nucleic Acids and Proteins, Edited by A. Ducruix and R. Giegé, The Practical Approach Series, Oxford Univ. Press, 1992 5. Protein Crystallization Techniques Strategies & Tips, Edited by Terese Bergfors, IUL 1999 6. Methods and Results in the Crystallization of Membrane Proteins, Edited by So Iwata, IUL 2003. 2

Rationale behind Green Screens In recent years UV fluorescence imaging has become an established method for protein/salt crystal discrimination. Whilst the majority of proteins contain at least one tryptophan residue there remain a number that fluoresce weakly or not at all, yielding a false negative. Green Screens contain a non-covalent fluorescent dye (1) which conveys fluorescence on most proteins when illuminated with UV light. This not only increases the signal-to-noise ratio (important for very small crystals), but also allows the identification of protein crystals lacking intrinsic fluorescence that would otherwise remain ambiguous. Green screens are available in three of our most successful screens, PACT premier, JCSG plus and MemGold TM. Use these screens together with UV transparent plates (MD11-00U-100) and ClearVue sheets (MD6-01S) for optimum UV performance. Reference: Groves et al (2007). A method for the general identification of protein crystals in crystallization experiments using a noncovalent fluorescent dye. Acta Cryst. D63, 526-535. Features of the Green Screens: Non-covalent binds in channels and not observed to affect crystallization or diffraction quality in any of the proteins tested*. Increased crystal contrast observe protein crystals <30 µm and also those lacking significant intrinsic fluorescence. Improved signal-to-noise on average quantum yield ratio of fluorescence is increased from 0.2 to 0.7. Easy-to-use available in three proven to be successful screens - PACT premier, JCSG plus and MemGold TM. Standard format for all automated systems 1 ml HT-96 block (10 ml kits available on request). 3

JCSG-plus Green Screen Wells A1 D12 MD1-53 Well # Conc. Salt Conc. Buffer ph Conc. Precipitant Dye concentration A1 0.2 M Lithium sulfate 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.5 50 % w/v PEG 400 100µM 1,8-ANS A2 None 0.1 M Sodium citrate 5.5 20 % w/v PEG 3000 100µM 1,8-ANS A3 0.2 M Ammonium citrate dibasic None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS A4 0.02 M Calcium chloride dihydrate 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.6 30 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS A5 0.2 M Magnesium formate dihydrate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS A6 0.2 M Lithium sulfate 0.1 M Phosphate/citrate 4.2 20 % w/v PEG 1000 100µM 1,8-ANS A7 None 0.1 M CHES 9.5 20 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS A8 0.2 M Ammonium formate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS A9 0.2 M Ammonium chloride None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS A10 0.2 M Potassium formate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS A11 0.2 M Ammonium phosphate monobasic 0.1 M Tris 8.5 50 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS A12 0.2 M Potassium nitrate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS B1 0.8 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Citrate 4.0 None 100µM 1,8-ANS B2 0.2 M Sodium thiocyanate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS B3 None 0.1 M BICINE 9.0 20 % w/v PEG 6000 100µM 1,8-ANS B4 None 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 10 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS 8 % v/v Ethylene glycol B5 None 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 40 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS 5 % w/v PEG 8000 B6 None 0.1 M Phosphate/citrate 4.2 40 % v/v Ethanol 100µM 1,8-ANS 5 % w/v PEG 1000 B7 None 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.6 8 % w/v PEG 4000 100µM 1,8-ANS B8 0.2 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Tris 7.0 10 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS B9 None 0.1 M Citrate 5.0 20 % w/v PEG 6000 100µM 1,8-ANS B10 0.2 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 50 % v/v PEG 200 100µM 1,8-ANS B11 1.6 M Sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate None 6.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS B12 0.2 M Potassium citrate tribasic monohydrate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS C1 0.2 M Sodium chloride 0.1 M Phosphate/citrate 4.2 20 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS C2 1.0 M Lithium chloride 0.1 M Citrate 4.0 20 % w/v PEG 6000 100µM 1,8-ANS C3 0.2 M Ammonium nitrate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS C4 None 0.1 M HEPES 7.0 10 % w/v PEG 6000 100µM 1,8-ANS C5 0.8 M Sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate 0.1 M Sodium HEPES 7.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS 0.8 M Potassium phosphate monobasic C6 None 0.1 M Phosphate/citrate 4.2 40 % v/v PEG 300 100µM 1,8-ANS C7 0.2 M Zinc acetate dihydrate 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.5 10 % w/v PEG 3000 100µM 1,8-ANS C8 None 0.1 M Tris 8.5 20 % v/v Ethanol 100µM 1,8-ANS C9 None 0.1 M Sodium/potassium phosphate 6.2 25 % v/v 1,2-Propandiol 100µM 1,8-ANS 10 %v/v Glycerol C10 None 0.1 M BICINE 9.0 10 % w/v PEG 20,000 100µM 1,8-ANS 2 % v/v 1,4-Dioxane C11 2.0 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.6 None 100µM 1,8-ANS C12 None None - 10 % w/v PEG 1000 100µM 1,8-ANS 10 % w/v PEG 8000 D1 None None - 24 % w/v PEG 1500 100µM 1,8-ANS 20 % v/v Glycerol D2 0.2 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Sodium HEPES 7.5 30 % v/v PEG 400 100µM 1,8-ANS D3 0.2 M Sodium chloride 0.1 M Sodium/potassium phosphate 6.2 50 % v/v PEG 200 100µM 1,8-ANS D4 0.2 M Lithium sulfate 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.5 30 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS D5 None 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 70 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS D6 0.2 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Tris 8.5 20 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS D7 0.2 M Lithium sulfate 0.1 M Tris 8.5 40 % v/v PEG 400 100µM 1,8-ANS D8 None 0.1 M Tris 8.0 40 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS D9 0.17 M Ammonium sulfate None - 26 % w/v PEG 4000 100µM 1,8-ANS 15 % v/v Glycerol D10 0.2 M Calcium acetate hydrate 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 40 % v/v PEG 300 100µM 1,8-ANS D11 0.14 M Calcium chloride dihydrate 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.6 14 % v/v 2-Propanol 100µM 1,8-ANS 30 % v/v Glycerol D12 0.04 M Potassium phosphate monobasic None - 16 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS 20 % v/v Glycerol 4

JCSG-plus Green Screen Wells E1 H12 MD1-53 Well # Conc. Salt Conc. Buffer ph Conc. Precipitant Dye concentration E1 1.0 M Sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS E2 2.0 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS 0.2 M Sodium chloride E3 0.2 M Sodium chloride 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 10 % v/v 2-Propanol 100µM 1,8-ANS E4 1.26 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Tris 8.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS 0.2 M Lithium sulfate E5 None 0.1 M CAPS 10.5 40 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS E6 0.2 M Zinc acetate dihydrate 0.1 M Imidazole 8.0 20 % w/v PEG 3000 100µM 1,8-ANS E7 0.2 M Zinc acetate dihydrate 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 10 % v/v 2-Propanol 100µM 1,8-ANS E8 1.0 M Ammonium phosphate dibasic 0.1 M Sodium acetate 4.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS E9 1.6 M Magneisum sulfate heptahydrate 0.1 M MES 6.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS E10 None 0.1 M BICINE 9.0 10 % w/v PEG 6000 100µM 1,8-ANS E11 0.16 M Calcium acetate hydrate 0.1 M Sodium cacodylate 6.5 14 % w/v PEG 8000/ 100µM 1,8-ANS 20 % v/v Glycerol E12 None 0.1 M Imidazole 8.0 10 % w/v PEG 8000 100µM 1,8-ANS F1 Cesium chloride 0.1 M MES 6.5 30 % v/v Jeffamine M-600 100µM 1,8-ANS F2 3.2 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Citrate 5.0 None 100µM 1,8-ANS F3 None 0.1 M Tris 8.0 20 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS F4 None 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 20 % v/v Jeffamine M-600 100µM 1,8-ANS F5 0.2 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Tris 8.5 50 % v/v Ethylene glycol 100µM 1,8-ANS F6 None 0.1 M BICINE 9.0 10 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS F7 0.8 M Succinic acid None 7.0 None 100µM 1,8-ANS F8 2.1 M DL-Malic acid None 7.0 None 100µM 1,8-ANS F9 2.4 M Sodium malonate dibasic monohydrate None 7.0 None 100µM 1,8-ANS F10 1.1 M Sodium malonate dibasic monohydrate 0.1 M HEPES 7.0 1 % v/v Jeffamine ED-2003 100µM 1,8-ANS F11 1.0 M Succinic acid 0.1 M HEPES 7.0 1 % w/v PEG 2000 MME 100µM 1,8-ANS F12 None 0.1 M HEPES 7.0 30 % v/v Jeffamine M-600 100µM 1,8-ANS G1 None 0.1 M HEPES 7.0 30 % v/v Jeffamine ED-2003 100µM 1,8-ANS G2 0.02 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 22 % w/v Poly(acrylic acid sodium salt) 5100 100µM 1,8-ANS G3 0.01 M Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Tris 8.5 20 % w/v Polyvinylpyrrolidone 100µM 1,8-ANS G4 0.2 M TMAO 0.1 M Tris 8.5 20 % w/v PEG 2000 MME 100µM 1,8-ANS G5 0.2 M Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 12 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS 0.005 M Cadmium chloride hemi(pentahydrate) 0.005 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.005 M Nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate G6 0.005 M Sodium malonate dibasic monohydrate None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS G7 0.2 M Succinic acid None - 15 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS G8 0.1 M DL-Malic acid None - 20 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS G9 0.15 M Potassium thiocyanate None - 30 % w/v PEG 2000 MME 100µM 1,8-ANS G10 0.1 M Potassium bromide None - 30 % w/v PEG 2000 MME 100µM 1,8-ANS G11 0.15 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS G12 2.0 M Sodium chloride 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS H1 3.0 M Magnesium formate dihydrate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 None 100µM 1,8-ANS H2 0.3 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 1 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H3 1.0 M None 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 25 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H4 Calcium chloride dihydrate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 45 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS H5 0.2 M Ammonium acetate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 45 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS H6 0.2 M Ammonium acetate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 17 % w/v PEG 10,000 100µM 1,8-ANS H7 0.1 M Ammonium sulfate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 25 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H8 0.2 M Sodium chloride 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 25 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H9 0.2 M Lithium sulfate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 25 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H10 0.2 M Ammonium acetate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 25 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H11 0.2 M Magnesium chloride hexahydrate 0.1 M Bis-Tris 5.5 25 % w/v PEG 3350 100µM 1,8-ANS H12 0.2 M Ammonium acetate 0.1 M HEPES 7.5 45 % v/v MPD 100µM 1,8-ANS Abbreviations: Bis Tris; Bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)imino-tris(hydroxymethyl)methane, CAPS; N-Cyclohexyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid, CHES; 2-(N- Cyclohexylamino)ethane Sulfonic Acid, HEPES; 2-(4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethanesulfonic Acid, Na HEPES; 2-(4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1- piperazinyl)ethanesulfonic Acid Sodium Salt, MES; 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid, MPD; 2,4-methyl pentanediol, PEG; Polyethylene glycol (2K, 6K, 8K and 10K correspond to the molecular weight, in thousands of Daltons, of PEG), Tris; 2-Amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol. N.B. Jeffamine ED-2001 has been superseded with Jeffamine ED-2003. Polyvinylpyrolidone K15 is called Polyvinylpyrolidine. 5

Re-Ordering details: Catalogue Description Pack size Catalogue Code JCSG-plus 96 x 10 ml MD1-37 JCSG-plus HT-96 96 x 1 ml MD1-40 Eco Screens JCSG-plus Eco Screen 96 x 10 ml MD1-37-ECO JCSG-plus HT-96 Eco Screen 96 x 1 ml MD1-40-ECO Green screens (contain fluorescent green dye- ideal for UV) JCSG-plus Green screen 96 x 10 ml MD1-56 JCSG-plus HT-96 Green screen 96 x 1 ml MD1-53 Combo Packs Super2 Combo Value Pack 2 x 96 x 10 ml MD1-75 (JCSG-plus + PACT-premier) Super2 Combo HT-96 Value Pack 2 x 96 x 10 ml MD1-75-HT (JCSG-plus HT-96 + PACT-premier HT-96) Single Reagents JCSG-plus single reagents 100 ml MDSR-37-tube number JCSG-plus single reagents 100 ml MDSR-40-well number For JCSG-plus stock solutions please visit the Optimization section on our website. ECO screens contain no cacodylate, dioxane or azide etc. 6