Pyrolysis kinetics of Melon (Citrullus colocynthis L.) seed husk



Similar documents
Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Thermogravimetric analysis and Kinetic study of poplar wood

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

Papapostolou 1, E. Kondili 1, J.K. Kaldellis 2

Biorefineries. International status quo and future directions. Ed de Jong / Rene van Ree

Numerical analysis of size reduction of municipal solid waste particles on the traveling grate of a waste-to-energy combustion chamber

KINECT AND THERMOGRAVIMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE WASTE COOKING OIL BIODIESEL WITH BASIL OIL LIKE ANTIOXIDANT ADDITIVE

Coal-To-Gas & Coal-To-Liquids

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 33: Combustion air calculation

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 34: Calculation of calorific value of fuels

The IMES Master Programme

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

Green Energy in Europe - Potentials and Prospects

The first law: transformation of energy into heat and work. Chemical reactions can be used to provide heat and for doing work.

European standardization of Solid Recovered Fuels

DETERMINING THE ENTHALPY OF FORMATION OF CaCO 3

Introduction to Waste Treatment Technologies. Contents. Household waste

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

SIX REASONS TO DRY BIOGAS To A LOW DEWPOINT BEFORE COMBUSTION IN A CHP ENGINE STEVEN SCOTT MARKET DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

VCE CHEMISTRY UNIT 2 Environmental Chemistry SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Weight Loss Determined from Mass Spectrometry Trend Data in a Thermogravimetric/Mass Spectrometer System

1.3 Properties of Coal

Introduction. P. Budrugeac, E. Segal *

Energy from waste. Introduction. Legal status of this guideline. What is energy from waste? Draft guideline

Experience with co-combustion of biomass and waste in coal-fired power plants

Module 1: History of Fuels. Lecture 6: Fundamental definitions, properties and various measurements

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

IB Chemistry. DP Chemistry Review

COMBUSTION. In order to operate a heat engine we need a hot source together with a cold sink

Biomass Syngas Production Technology by Gasification for Liquid Fuel and Other Chemicals

Better DSC Isothermal Cure Kinetics Studies Using Power Compensation DSC

Modular chemical conversions delivering clean energy

Chem 1A Exam 2 Review Problems

DELIVERING THE BIOENERGY TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE TO THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

How To Model Biomass

From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

How To Run A Power Plant In Celje

Cofiring of biomass in coal-fired power plants European experience Dr Colin Henderson IEA Clean Coal Centre

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Enthalpy of Reaction and Calorimetry worksheet

Synthesis of Regional Energy Supply Chain Based on Palm Oil Biomass

Product sustainability in the water based polymers industry

Bomb Calorimetry. Example 4. Energy and Enthalpy

Figure 3-1-1: Alkaline hydrolysis (saponification) of oil to make soaps.

Introduction on Glycerol as co-product from biodiesel plants

Chemical Kinetics. Reaction Rate: The change in the concentration of a reactant or a product with time (M/s). Reactant Products A B

How To Gasify Wood And Agriculture Biomass

FP628. Nitrogen / Protein Determination by Combustion. Rev 1-6/8/11

Introductory Laboratory EST - Experiment 9 Calorimetry Introductory Laboratory Energy Science and Technology. Experiment 9. Physical Chemistry

Bachelor s Programme in Agricultural and Environmental Management Study line: Environmental Management. Total Study description

Experimental study on atmospheric pollutant emissions from heating systems, in Italy

Ecological Aspects of Oil Shale Processing

Lecture 35: Atmosphere in Furnaces

From Biomass. NREL Leads the Way. to Biofuels

Gasification as means of Waste-to-Energy - Main Parameters and application -

NITROGEN OXIDES FORMATION in combustion processes COMBUSTION AND FUELS

Torrefaction Process and Product Quality Optimisation

Torrefaction: technology overview and development status

Boiler efficiency measurement. Department of Energy Engineering

KINETIC DETERMINATION OF SELENIUM BY VISIBLE SPECTROSCOPY (VERSION 1.8)

CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM (ICE METHOD)

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF PALM OIL MILL EFFLUENT AND OIL PALM FROND WASTE MIXTURE AS AN ALTERNATIVE BIOMASS FUEL

CHEMISTRY STANDARDS BASED RUBRIC ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND BONDING

Characteristics of torrefied products and their dependence on process conditions

Fortum Otso -bioliquid

VALIDATION, MODELING, AND SCALE-UP OF CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION WITH OXYGEN UNCOUPLING

LCA EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF RECYCLING OF PLASTICS FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE

Characterization of Polymers Using TGA

Electrochemical Kinetics ( Ref. :Bard and Faulkner, Oldham and Myland, Liebhafsky and Cairns) R f = k f * C A (2) R b = k b * C B (3)

atm = 760 torr = 760 mm Hg = kpa = psi. = atm. = atm. = 107 kpa 760 torr 1 atm 760 mm Hg = 790.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry DSC

Exp 13 Volumetric Analysis: Acid-Base titration

FAST PYROLYSIS EFFECT OF WOOD DRYING ON THE YIELD AND PROPERTIES OF BIO-OIL

SUPPLEMENTARY TOPIC 3 ENERGY AND CHEMICAL REACTIONS

Reaction Rates and Chemical Kinetics. Factors Affecting Reaction Rate [O 2. CHAPTER 13 Page 1

Poultry Litter as Renewable Energy Resource Using SOFC Technology

General Chemistry I (FC, 09-10) Lab #3: The Empirical Formula of a Compound. Introduction

Standard Free Energies of Formation at 298 K. Average Bond Dissociation Energies at 298 K

Forward. Contents. Bioenergy Development Plan

Ksawery Kuligowski Pomeranian Center for Environmental Research and Technology POMCERT University of Gdansk Poland

Efficient forest biomass supply chain for biorefineries A project for cross border cooperation

Use of Substitute Fuels in Large Combustion Plants (LCPs)

HEAT UNIT 1.1 KINETIC THEORY OF GASES Introduction Postulates of Kinetic Theory of Gases

Characterization of Electronic Materials Using Thermal Analysis

(a) graph Y versus X (b) graph Y versus 1/X

Biomass pellets production with industrial and agro-industrial wastes

Renewable energy in transport

CHEM 105 HOUR EXAM III 28-OCT-99. = -163 kj/mole determine H f 0 for Ni(CO) 4 (g) = -260 kj/mole determine H f 0 for Cr(CO) 6 (g)

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

In order to solve this problem it is first necessary to use Equation 5.5: x 2 Dt. = 1 erf. = 1.30, and x = 2 mm = m. Thus,

EXPERIMENT 12: Empirical Formula of a Compound

Haldor Topsøe Catalysing Your Business

BIOENERGY (FROM NORWEGIAN FORESTS) GOOD OR BAD FOR THE CLIMATE?

Gasification, Producer Gas and Syngas

Investigation of activation energy of polypropylene composite thermooxidation by model-free methods

6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Transcription:

Abstract Pyrolysis kinetics of Melon (Citrullus colocynthis L.) seed husk Bemgba Bevan Nyakuma Centre for Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia. *Corresponding author Email: bbnyax1@gmail.com, bnbevan2@live.utm.my This study is aimed at investigating the thermochemical fuel characteristics and kinetic decomposition of melon seed husks (MSH) under inert (pyrolysis) conditions. The calorific value, elemental composition, proximate analyses and thermal kinetics of MSH was examined. The kinetic parameters; activation energy E and frequency factor A for MSH decomposition under pyrolysis conditions were determined using the Kissinger and isoconversional Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) methods. The values of E for MSH ranged from 146.81 to 296 kj/mol at degrees of conversion α = 0.15 to 0.60 for FWO. The decomposition of MSH process was fastest at α = 0.15 and slowest at α = 0.60 with average E and A values of 192.96 kj/mol and 2.86 x 10 26 min -1, respectively at correlation values of 0.9847. The kinetic values of MSH using the Kissinger method are E = 161.26 kj/mol and frequency factor, A = 2.08 x 10 10 min -1 with the correlation value, R 2 = 0.9958. The results indicate that MSH possesses important characteristics of a potential solid biofuel (SBF) for future thermochemical applications in clean energy and power generation. Keywords: Biofuel, Pyrolysis, Kinetics, Melon, Seed, Husks Introduction Melon (Citrullus colocynthis L.) is an important oil seed and perennial cash crop widely cultivated in many parts of Africa. The vegetable oil extracted from melon seed is primarily used for domestic consumption although medicinal uses [1, 2] and industrial applications for biodiesel [3, 4], soap, detergents and margarine production, have been reported. In addition, the seed cake is a rich source of protein and minerals for livestock feeds and nutritional supplements [5]. Conversely, the extraction of vegetable oil from melon seeds produces enormous quantities of lignocellulosic waste commonly called melon seed husk (MSH). Currently, MSH is combusted in open air or dumped in refuse dumps and landfill sites thereby exacerbating the prevalence of greenhouse gases (GHG) and environmental burden of pollutant emissions on the environment [6, 7]. The utilization of MSH for water treatment, compost material, soil remediation, and weed suppressants is widely reported in literature [8-10]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to explore more efficient routes for the valorization of agricultural waste such as MSH for future clean bioenergy applications. The lignocellulosic nature of MSH indicates it is a potentially sustainable solid biofuel feedstock (SBF) for solid (biochar), liquid and gaseous biofuels production via torrefaction, pyrolysis, and gasification technologies [11]. However, the utilization of MSH for clean biofuels, green chemicals and other bioenergy applications has not been exploited comprehensively. This is largely due to the lack of comprehensive understanding on thermochemical fuel properties of lignocellulosic waste essential for design calculations and process optimization of thermochemical conversion processes. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is one of the most widely utilized analytic techniques for investigating the thermochemical fuel properties and thermal decomposition behaviour of lignocellulosic waste. Data from TGA can be employed by scientists, engineers and policy makers

to efficiently make decisions regarding feedstock materials, cost analysis, process equipment design and optimization of biomass thermal conversion systems. Therefore, this study is aimed at investigating the thermal decomposition kinetics of MSH under pyrolysis conditions using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The study also presents an overview of the thermochemical fuel properties of MSH and its potential as a sustainable solid biofuel feedstock for future applications in biomass thermal conversion systems. Experimental Materials and Methods Melon seeds were purchased from a local market in Nigeria and dehulled to obtain the husks investigated in this study. The dry melon seed husks (MSH) were milled in rotary dry miller and sieved using a 250 µm sieve to obtain homogenous sized particles. The pulverised MSH was subsequently characterised via ultimate analysis, proximate analysis and bomb calorimetry to determine the elemental composition, fuel properties and calorific value respectively. The ultimate analysis was determined in the Vario EL Microcube TM CHNS analyser using ASTM D5291 method. Proximate analysis was investigated by ASTM standard techniques E871, E872 and D1102 for moisture, volatiles and ash content respectively while fixed carbon was determined by difference. The heating value of the fuel was determined using an IKA C2000 bomb calorimeter. The results for thermochemical properties of MSH are presented in Table 1. Table 1: Proximate and Ultimate analysis of MSH Element Symbol Composition (wt %) Carbon C 51.80 Hydrogen H 6.67 Nitrogen N 0.85 Sulphur S 0.40 Oxygen O 40.28 Heating Value (HHV) HHV MJ/kg 21.78 Moisture M 7.53 Volatile Matter VM 79.52 Ash A 1.50 Fixed Carbon FC 18.99 Volatiles-Fixed carbon ratio VM/FC 4.19 The thermal analysis of MSH was examined by thermogravimetric analysis in the Netzsch 209 F3 TG analyser. Approximately 8 mg of MSH was heated in an aluminum crucible from room temperature to 800 C and heating rates of 5, 10, 20 C per min under nitrogen atmosphere. The thermograms of MSH were analysed using the proprietary Proteus TM Netzsch thermal analysis software. The resulting TG-DTG data (not presented here) was applied to the Kissinger, and Flynn- Wall-Ozawa (FWO) models to investigate to determine the kinetic parameters for MSH under pyrolysis conditions for degrees of conversion, α = 0.15 to 0.60.

Kinetic theory Biomass pyrolysis involves the thermal conversion of biomaterials in the absence of air or oxygen to produce liquid, gas and solid (biochar). The general equation of biomass pyrolysis is described by the generic equation [11]; C n H m O p (Biomass) Heat C x H y O z + C a H b O c + H 2 O + C (char) liquid gas (1) The one step global model for the pyrolysis of biomass is assumed to occur according to Eq 1. Conversely, the rate of pyrolytic decomposition of biomass can be described by the expression; dα dt = k(t)f(α) (2) Where α - degree of conversion; t, time; f(α) the reaction model and k(t) is temperature dependent rate constant given by the Arrhenius relation expressed as; k(t) = Ae E/RT (3) Where the terms; E, T, R, and A represent the activation energy in kj mol -1, absolute temperature in K, molar gas constant in J mol -1 K -1 and frequency factor in min -1. Furthermore, the reaction model and its derivative form f(α) can be applied to describe the pyrolytic decomposition of biomass assuming a reaction order denoted as, n, based on the expression; f(α) = (1 α) n (4) Consequently, the weight loss (α) of the biomass materials during thermal decomposition is defined by the expression; α = m i m a m i m f (5) Where the terms m i, m a, and m f represent the initial mass, actual mass at time, t, and final mass of the biomass material at the end of the process, respectively. Hence, by substituting Eq.s 3 and 4 into Eq.2 an expression for the pyrolysis of biomass materials can be deduced; dα dt = Ae E/RT (1 α) n (6) For the thermal decomposition of biomass materials at linear heating rate, β = dt/dt, under nonisothermal thermogravimetric analysis, Eq. 6 can be re-written as; dα (1 α) n = A β e E/RT dt (7) Consequently the kinetics of biomass pyrolytic decomposition can be analysed from the numerical solutions of integrating Eq.7, using the model free kinetics of Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) [12].

Kissinger Method The Kissinger method can be utilised to determine the kinetic parameters by plotting the terms In (β/t 2 m) against 1000/T m given in this expression [13]; In ( β 2 T ) = In (AR m E ) E (8) RT m The kinetic parameters E and A can be determined from the slope E/R and intercept In (AR/E) of the curve respectively. Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) Method The FWO method determines the kinetic parameters from the plots of In (β) against 1000/T presented in the expression [12, 14]; In(β) = In ( A αe α Rg α ) 5.331 1.052 E α RT αi (9) Consequently, the activation energy E and the frequency factor A can be deduced from the slope given by -1.052E/R and intercept of the curve, respectively. Results and Discussion Kinetic Analysis Figures 1 and 2 present plots for the kinetic analysis of MSH using the Kissinger and Flynn-Wall- Ozawa methods, respectively. By applying Eq. 8, the kinetic parameters E and A for MSH were calculated from the peak decomposition temperatures; 332.60 C, 346.50 C and 358.20 C of MSH at the heating rates of 5, 10, 20 C per min using the Kissinger method. Consequently, the kinetic parameters E and A were deduced from the slope and intercept of the plot lines in Fig 1. The values for activation energy, E = 161.26 kj/mol and frequency factor, A = 2.08 x 10 10 min -1 with the correlation value, R 2 = 0.9958. The Kissinger method has been applied in literature to investigate the thermokinetics of biomass [15].

In β In (β/tm^2) -9.5-10.0-10.5 y = -19.396x + 20.794 R² = 0.9958-11.0-11.5 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1000/Tm Figure 1: Kinetic plots for the Kissinger method. Figure 2 represents the kinetic plots for MSH using the FWO method for degrees of conversion α = 0.05 to 0.60 at heating rates of 5, 10, and 20 C per min from room temperature to 800 C. 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 1000/T (K -1 ) Figure 2: Kinetic plots for Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO) method. As can observed Fig. 2, the kinetic plots for MSH for the degrees of conversion = 0.5 to.60 using the FWO method are parallel to each other which suggests that the order and mechanism of

thermal decomposition reactions of MSH are similar. It is generally agreed that the one step global model for biomass kinetic decomposition is assumed to be first order [16] as defined in Eq. 1 [11]. Table 2 presents the kinetic parameters for MSH calculated from the slope and intercept of the kinetic plots of FWO in Fig.2 obtained at high correlation values. Table 2: Kinetic parameters for MSH from the FWO method. α R 2 E (kj/mol) A (min -1 ) 0.15 0.9422 146.81 1.56 x 10 17 0.20 0.9988 167.35 4.81 x 10 18 0.25 0.9989 176.42 1.39 x 10 19 0.30 0.9989 185.73 4.02 x 10 19 0.35 0.9989 192.06 8.14 x 10 19 0.40 0.9989 198.51 1.65 x 10 20 0.45 0.9980 201.77 2.35 x 10 20 0.50 0.9933 165.39 7.68 x 10 16 0.55 0.9416 199.58 6.22 x 10 19 0.60 0.9773 296.00 2.86 x 10 27 Average 0.9847 192.96 2.86 x 10 26 The values of E for the fuel observably increased from α = 0.15 (E = 146.81 kj/mol) to α = 0.45 (E = 201.77 kj/mol) decreased at 0.5 before increasing to 296 kj/mol which marks the highest activation observed during the thermal analysis of MSH. This indicates that the decomposition of MSH is slowest at α = 0.60 while the process is fast at α = 0.15. Overall the average value for activation energy, E is 192.96 kj/mol, frequency factor, A is 2.86 x 10 26 min -1, at correlation values of 0.9847. In comparison, the average kinetic values of MSH using FWO are clearly higher than values from the Kissinger method E = 161.26 kj/mol and frequency factor, A = 2.08 x 10 10 min -1 with the correlation value, R 2 = 0.9958. This may be due to the fact that the Kissinger method only accounts for the maximum peak decomposition temperature (T max) of the fuel compared to extensive temperature range (based on degree of conversions) of the isoconversional FWO method. Overall, the parametric kinetic values of MSH fall are in good agreement with the range of values reported for biomass in literature [17]. Conclusion The study was aimed at investigating the thermochemical fuel and kinetic decomposition characteristics of melon seed husks (MSH) under inert (pyrolysis) conditions. The elemental composition, proximate analyses, calorific value and thermal decomposition kinetics of MSH was examined using the Kissinger and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa methods. The results indicated that the average parametric kinetic values of MSH using FWO method were higher than the Kissinger method. This can be ascribed to the isoconversional nature of the FWO method over an extensive temperature range (based on degree of conversions) compared to the maximum peak decomposition temperature (T max) of Kissinger method. The parametric kinetic values were observed to be in good agreement with literature values for other biomass. The findings of the study also indicate that MSH possesses important characteristics of a potential solid biofuel (SBF) for utilization in future thermochemical applications for clean bioenergy generation.

References 1. Jarret RL, Levy IJ. Oil and Fatty Acid Contents in Seed of Citrullus lanatus Schrad. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012;60(20):5199-204. doi:10.1021/jf300046f. 2. Oluba OM, Eidangbe GO, Ojieh GC, Idonije BO. Palm and Egusi melon oils lower serum and liver lipid profile and improve antioxidant activity in rats fed a high fat diet. International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2011;3(2):47-51. 3. Giwa S, Abdullah LC, Adam NM. Investigating Egusi (Citrullus colocynthis L.) seed oil as potential biodiesel feedstock. Energies. 2010;3(4):607-18. 4. Giwa SO, Chuah LA, Adam NM. Fuel properties and rheological behavior of biodiesel from egusi (Colocynthis citrullus L.) seed kernel oil. Fuel Processing Technology. 2014;122(0):42-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.014. 5. Ugwumba C. Allocative Efficiency of'egusi'melon (Colocynthis citrullus lanatus) Production Inputs in Owerri West Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria. Journal Agricultural Science. 2010;1(1):95-100. 6. Ogbe A, George G. Nutritional and Anti-nutrient Composition of Melon Husks: Potential as Feed Ingredient in Poultry Diet. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2012;2231:606X. 7. Nyakuma BB. Solid biofuel potential of Acacia mangium leaves: PeerJ PrePrints2015. Report No.: 2167-9843. 8. Achigan-Dako EG, Fagbemissi R, Avohou HT, Vodouhe RS, Coulibaly O, Ahanchede A. Importance and practices of Egusi crops (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai, Cucumeropsis mannii Naudin and Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl. cv. Aklamkpa ) in sociolinguistic areas in Benin. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2008;12(4):393-403. 9. Foo K, Hameed B. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from melon (Citrullus vulgaris) seed hull by microwave-induced NaOH activation. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2012;47(1-3):130-8. 10. Okieimen F, Onyenkpa V. Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions with melon (Citrullus vulgaris) seed husks. Biological Wastes. 1989;29(1):11-6. 11. Basu P. Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory. Academic press; 2010. 12. Flynn JH, Wall LA. A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Letters. 1966;4(5):323-8. doi:10.1002/pol.1966.110040504. 13. Kissinger HE. Variation of peak temperature with heating rate in differential thermal analysis. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. 1956;57(4):217-21. 14. Ozawa T. A New Method of Analyzing Thermogravimetric Data. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 1965;38(11):1881-6. doi:10.1246/bcsj.38.1881. 15. Ledakowicz S, Stolarek P. Kinetics of biomass thermal decomposition. CHEMICAL PAPERS-SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. 2003;56(6):378-81. 16. Slopiecka K, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F. Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study of poplar wood pyrolysis. Applied Energy. 2012;97:491-7. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.056. 17. Sun WG, Zhao H, Yan HX, Sun BB, Dong SS, Zhang CW et al. The Pyrolysis Characteristics and Kinetics of Jerusalem artichoke Stalk Using Thermogravimetric Analysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2012;34(7):626-35. doi:10.1080/15567036.2011.615006.