Bailey Tool for Gradation Control in Superpave Mix Design



Similar documents
Bailey Method for Gradation Selection in Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixture Design

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK

SECTION 334 (Pages ) is deleted and the following substituted: SECTION 334 SUPERPAVE ASPHALT CONCRETE

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

Rutting Based Evaluation of Asphalt Mixes

Shotcrete Quality Control and Testing for an Underground Mine in Canada

Oh No, We Got an Airport Job! Contractor Quality Control. Investment in Staff, Labs and Equipment. We ve Come A Long Way.

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES

Hot Mix Asphalt Test Result Verification and Dispute Resolution

Evaluation of Permeability of Superpave Asphalt Mixtures ABSTRACT

SEAUPG Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA Thursday, November 19, 2015

SECTION 403 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT

Otta Seal BACKGROUND GENERAL DESCRIPTION DESIGN ASPECTS. Category : Technical Information/On-carriageway/

SPECIFICATIONS. INTERLOCKING CONCRETE POROUS PAVING UNITS or Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers (PICP)

AGREGADOS RECICLADOS MITOS Y REALIDADES

Wisconsin Highway Research Program

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

Testing and appraisal of Lucobit polymer effect as an additive on asphalt mixture performance

6 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

SPECIAL NOTE FOR ASPHALT WATERPROOFING MIX FOR BRIDGE-DECK OVERLAYS AND ADJACENT APPROACHES

Sieve Analysis of Aggregates

Use of Marginal Materials & Fly ash in Road Works

research report Investigation of Proposed AASHTO Rut Test Procedure Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Virginia Transportation Research Council

Asphalt for Athletic Uses

APPENDIX 2 MIX DESIGNS. Chapter 4: mix design calculation sheet for 40 N/mm 2 strength)

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 300 BASES SECTION 304 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE DESCRIPTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

A REVIEW OF AGGREGATE AND ASPHALT MIXTURE SPECIFIC GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS AND THEIR IMPACTS ON ASPHALT MIX DESIGN PROPERTIES AND MIX ACCEPTANCE

Division 2 Section Section 02795

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (QAP) City Rohnert Park

Section 902. AGGREGATES

DETERMINING ASPHALT CONTENT FROM ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES BY THE IGNITION METHOD

:: ARTIFICIAL SAND :: Zone One Sand : Zone Two Sand :

Pavement Thickness. esign and RCC-Pave Software. Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavement: Design and Construction. October 24, 2006 Atlanta, Georgia

Section 2100-Trenching and Tunneling

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 632 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

AASHTO Subcomittee on Materials Biloxi, Mississippi August 4-10, 2012 Chris Abadie, P.E.

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT

Quality Assurance Program. June by Texas Department of Transportation (512) all rights reserved

Quality control: Annex-A.

Lab 1 Concrete Proportioning, Mixing, and Testing

Principles of Resolving Test Result Differences. Presented by Cindy Rutkoski Rocky Mountain Asphalt Education Center Instructor

VARIATIONS IN ASPHALT ADHESION AS A FUNCTION OF AGGREGATE TYPE

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (1995 MasterFormat Section 02795)

CHAPTER 2 AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM

SECTION PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (1995 MasterFormat Section 02795)

THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF MATERIALS USING THE VIBRATORY HAMMER COMPACTION

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Soils and Aggregates Division

National Center for Asphalt Technology. Pavement Test Track Research Findings

Aggregates for Path Construction

1.5 Concrete (Part I)

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND HIGH SPEED ROADS

PROPERTIES AND MIX DESIGNATIONS

POWDER PROPERTIES LABORATORY

PART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL

Inspections: Central Laboratory of the Regions

SPECIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF UNBOUND GRANULAR PAVEMENT LAYERS

CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE OF ULTRATHIN ASPHALT FRICTION COURSE

CHAPTER 2 AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PROGRAM

SECTION 623 CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND, EPOXY MORTAR AND EPOXY POLYMER CONCRETE OVERLAY SECTION CONCRETE BONDING COMPOUND.

No allowance will be made for classification of different types of material encountered.

SECTION 55 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS (FAA D-701)

INDEX DESCRIPTION MATERIALS APPROVAL OF SUBBASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION MEASUREMENT PAYMENT 6

The Manitoba Water Services Board SECTION Standard Construction Specifications PIPE EXCAVATION, BEDDING AND BACKFILL Page 1 of 11

DEVELOPMENT OF A TESTING TEMPERATURE TO BE USED WITH THE HAMBURG WHEEL TRACKING DEVICE ON ASPHALT MIXTURES THAT UTILIZE PERFORMANCE GRADE BINDERS

asphalt applications Construction and surfacing of footways and cycleways using asphalt mpa asphalt Asphalt Information Service

NorthEast Transportation Training and Certification Program (NETTCP) Course Registration Form

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES FOP FOR AASHTO T 27 (11)

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO T 85

Effect of basalt aggregates and plasticizer on the compressive strength of concrete

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

Florida s Experience with Crumb Rubber

Development of Laboratory Performance Test Procedures and Trial Specifications for Hot Mix Asphalt: Final Report

South Dakota QC/QA Asphalt Concrete Training Manual January 2015

PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 888 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT USING QC/QA.

OHIO ASPHALT PAVING CONFERENCE

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Environmental Education Associates. Asbestos in Construction

EVALUATION OF SASOBIT FOR USE IN WARM MIX ASPHALT

MATERIALS CERTIFICATION SCHOOLS

SECTION 4Aggegate Subbase

After reading this lesson you will be able to: 12.3 IMPORTANCE OF ROOF 12.4 TYPES OF ROOF IN A HOUSE

4-02 Gravel Base Ballast and Crushed Surfacing

Installing Porous Pavement Waukesha County Dept. of Parks & Land Use Storm Water BMP Design and Installation Workshop March 11, 2009

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

RECYCLED ASPHALT SHINGLES IN ROAD APPLICATIONS An Overview of the State of Practice

Evaluation of Long-Lasting Perpetual Asphalt Pavement Using Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Arnar Agustsson Sulton Azamov

DryWeight BulkVolume

GUIDELINES FOR TESTING FRESH SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE

Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates in Structural Concrete in Mauritius

How to build a Pizza Oven in 4 days

UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

Roadstone - which rock? Investigating the best rock type for the wearing course of roads

Transcription:

What is the Bailey Method? Bailey Tool for Gradation Control in Superpave Mix Design 48 th Annual Idaho Asphalt Conference The Bailey Method will Evaluate individual s Determine what is Coarse and Fine Evaluate packing characteristics Combined blend by VOLUME and by weight Estimate Air void and VMA changes due to gradation. October 23, 08 The Bailey Method Aggregate Blending Originally developed by Robert D. Bailey The Bailey Method was developed by Bob Bailey in the early 1980 s. He retired as a civil engineer, who worked with the Illinois DOT, District 5 Materials Bureau for over 35 years Research and Development of the Method has been continued by the Heritage Research Group of Indianapolis Where do you start? Trial and Error? Specification Bands Coarse Medium Fine Which blend is best? How will a gradation change affect Volumetric Properties Is there a more systematical way to calculate changes?

What is VMA? Evaluating Aggregates by Volume VMA Volume of the voids in a compacted sample to accommodate asphalt and air. Why? Better understand packing Control VOLUME of Coarse and Fine for Mix Type How? Test the individual Coarse and Fine s VMA Characteristics VMA Relationship 25 %VMA 15 5 4 5 6 7 % Asphalt Binder

Aggregate Packing Principle #1 P.C.S. What Influences the Results? Gradation continuously-graded, gap-graded, etc. Shape - flat & elongated, cubical, round Surface Texture (micro-texture) - smooth, rough Type & Amount of Compactive Effort - static pressure, impact or shearing Strength All Round s Void size = 0.15 x d Round face of Diameter (d) = NMPS What Happens to Void Size & Space? Principle #1 P.C.S. Round face of Diameter (d) = NMPS 2 Round & 1 Flat Flat face of Void size = 0. x d

Principle #1 P.C.S. Principle #1 P.C.S. Round face of Diameter (d) = NMPS Round face of Diameter (d) = NMPS 1 Round & 2 Flat Void size = 0.24 x d Flat face of Average Void size = 0.22*d for all four conditions Flat face of Primary Control Sieve = 0.22 x NMAS Principle #1 P.C.S. Diameter (d) = NMPS Diameter = NMAS All Flat s Void size = 0.29 x d Flat face of Average Void Size = 0.22 x NMAS Primary Control Sieve 0.22 x NMAS

Primary Control Sieve Primary Control Sieve - PCS Mixture NMAS NMAS x 0.22 Primary Control Sieve 37.5mm (1-1/2 ) 8.250mm 9.5mm (3/8 ) The PCS delineates the size in an blend that defines: 25.0mm (1 ) 5.500mm 4.75mm (#4) 19.0mm (3/4 ) 4.180mm 4.75mm (#4) 12.5mm (1/2 ) 2.750mm 2.36mm (#8) 9.5mm (3/8 ) 2.090mm 2.36mm (#8) 4.75mm (#4) 1.045mm 1.18mm (#16) PCS determines the break between Coarse and Fine in the combined blend and if a given is a CA or FA Coarse Aggregate (CA) The largest s that create voids in the mix. and Fine Aggregate (FA) The smaller s that fill the voids created by the Coarse Aggregate 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 0 4 The Main Principles Primary Control sieve (PCS) defines what is coarse and fine Fine Agg Fine Ratio (FA f ) Relates to the amount of fine sand in the mix Fine 3 PCS Coarse Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power 1 2 Coarse Aggregate Ratio (CA) Relates to the coarse & intermediate fractions. Fine Agg. Coarse Ratio (FA c ) Relates to the amount of large sand in the mix. Bailey Method Mix Types The Bailey Method defines the mix type by volume of CA in the mix. Laboratory Unit weight Tests are conducted to determine the volume of Coarse and Fine Aggregate Stockpiles

Fine-Graded Mixes Loose Unit Weight CA & FA NO compactive effort CA Volume < LUW Little to No -to contact of CA Fine fraction carries most of the load Std Unit Weight Bucket Start of -to- contact Determine LUW Kg/m3 or lbs./ft3 Determine volume of voids Rodded Unit Weight CA & FA Coarse-Graded Mixes With compactive effort 3 layers in Unit Wt Bucket Rodded 25 times each Increased -to- contact Determine RUW Kg/m3 or lbs./ft3 Determine volume of voids CA Volume LUW Some -to contact of CA Coarse and Fine fractions carry load

Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixes Coarse vs. Fine CA Volume > RUW Coarse fraction carries the load Remaining voids filled with mastic FA, mineral filler, fibers & asphalt cement The individual s stockpiles must be categorized as Coarse or Fine. Stockpile passing the PCS of the Mix has: more than 50% of the mix = Fine Aggregate. less than 50% of the mix = Coarse Aggregate. Comparison of Different CA s Chosen Unit Weight - CA(s) ACBF Slag Limestone Steel Slag < LUW LUW RUW Gsb = 2.30 Gsb = 2.63 Gsb = 3.14 All 3 at their corresponding LUW 1176.7 kg/m 3 1378.1 kg/m 3 1683.0 kg/m 3 Voids = 48.8% Voids = 47.6% Voids = 46.4% Fine-Graded Coarse-Graded SMA 60-85% 95-5% 1-125% INCREASING CA CUW

Why is mix type Important? 9.5mm NMAS Aggregate Blends for Varying % CA LUW The Bailey Method will Estimate both due to gradation movement Direction of VMA change and Rate of VMA change,. The rate and direction of change is different for each type of mix!!! Percent Passing 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 0 F C 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 0% 1% 1% 130% 0.075 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 Sieve Size ^ 0.45 Power VMA vs. CA Volume Bailey Method Perspective High Avoid these areas if possible Fine-graded mix Dense-graded mix CA volume less than the CA LUW condition, Coarse fraction is spread apart and floating in the fine fraction. VMA Coarse-graded mix Dense-graded mix CA volume equal to or greater than the CA LUW condition Represents the beginning of CA interlock. Low 50 60 70 80 90 0 1 1 130 % CA LUW (Volume of CA) Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA) Gap-graded mix CA volume greater than the CA RUW condition Coarse fraction skeleton to carry the load.

Moral of the last slide The Four Main Principles To design a mix with rock on rock contact, Determine the volume of coarse Then calculate the volume of fine necessary to fill the voids! 1. % PCS (Volume of CA) Increase/decrease in VMA depends on mix type 2. CA ratio (Control with CA Volume blend) Low values can be susceptible to segregation High values can be difficult to compact As it increases, VMA increases 3. FA c ratio (Control with FA Volume blend) As it increases, VMA decreases 4. FA f ratio (Control with % minus 0.075mm) As it increases, VMA decreases The Main Principles The Four Main Principles 0 90 80 Primary Control sieve (PCS) defines what is coarse and fine 2 Coarse-Graded & Fine Graded Mixes Rules-of-thumb or ratios 70 60 50 40 30 0 Fine Agg Fine Ratio (FA f ) Relates to the amount of fine sand in the mix 4 Fine 3 PCS 1 Coarse Aggregate Ratio (CA) Relates to the coarse & intermediate fractions. Fine Agg. Coarse Ratio (FA c ) Relates to the amount of large sand in the mix. Coarse Amount and Direction for each 1% Change in VMA 1. %PCS ± % = ± 1% VMA 2. CA Ratio ± = ±1% VMA 3. FA c Ratio ± = ±1% VMA 4. FA f Ratio ± = ±1% VMA Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power

HRG Blending Spreadsheets So How Does the Method Help? In Developing New Blends: Field Compactability Segregation Susceptibility In Evaluating Existing Blends: What s worked and what hasn t? More clearly define principle ranges In Estimating VMA/Void changes: Between Design trials Between QC and/or QA samples For PROPOSED blend changes Saves Time and Reduces Risk! HRG Basic Voids Estimating Sheets Does the Method Work? 0 90 AI Blend 4 & 6 80 70 60 % Passing 50 40 30 Blend 6 Blend 4 0.075mm 2.36 mm 19 mm 25 mm Sieve size (raised to 0.45 power)

AI Blend 4 & 6 The Bailey Method Regularly Scheduled Courses Blend 6 Blend 4 25-mm 0% 0% 19-mm 98.7% 98.2% 12.5-mm 89.9% 86.4% 9.5-mm 74.4% 71.0% 4.75-mm 38.4% 38.8% 2.36-mm 23.0% 25.1% 1.18-mm 15.7% 17.7% 0.6-mm 11.2% 12.6% 0.3-mm 7.8% 7.8% 0.15-mm 5.9% 5.3% 0.075-mm 5.2% 4.6% % Passing 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 0.075mm Blend 6 Blend 4 2.36 mm 19 mm25 mm Sieve size (raised to 0.45 power) Introductory Course 1 Day 18 Hosted to date by SAPA Main Course 3 Days Early February & January Lexington Over 350 graduates Advance Course 2 Days Lexington Graduates with one year experience Bill Pine Heritage Research Advance Mix Design TRB Circular Worldwide Canada Caribbean China France Russia South Africa AI Blend 4 & 6 The Bailey Method Blend 4 Blend 6 25-mm 0% 0% 19-mm 98.7% 98.2% 12.5-mm 89.9% 86.4% 9.5-mm 74.4% 71.0% 4.75-mm 38.4% 38.8% 2.36-mm 23.0% 25.1% 1.18-mm 15.7% 17.7% 0.6-mm 11.2% 12.6% 0.3-mm 7.8% 7.8% 0.15-mm 5.9% 5.3% 0.075-mm 5.2% 4.6% % Passing 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 0.075mm 2.36 mm Sieve size (raised to 0.45 power) Blend 6 Blend 4 19 mm 25 mm Blend 4 Blend 6 %Binder 4.7% 4.7% Air Voids 3.7% 5.7% VMA 13.5% 15.3% Est. Binder @4% Air Voids 4.6% 5.4% Est. VMA 13.5% 15.0% Bailey predicted change 1.4% I got to the lab the day after attending the class and we had a mix design problem. I plugged the gradations into the Bailey spreadsheet and it told me to take the mix in a direction I would never taken When we got the results back the volumetrics were right down the middle Graduate of the 3-day Bailey Course

The Bailey Method g{tç~á 4 This class answered 95% of the questions I ve had over the last 30 years of doing mix designs And showed me how to find the answers on the remaining 5% www.asphaltinstitute.org Graduate of the 3-day Bailey Course H. Wayne Jones, PE Senior Regional Engineer Columbus, OH wjones@asphaltinstitute.org The Bailey Method To sum it all up in numbers, last year we lost around $250,000 in deducts for Voids, VMA, and Compaction. This year, using the Bailey Method, we are up $300,000 in incentives. To make this an even greater accomplishment, we achieved this on half of the incentive jobs we had last year. Graduate of the 3-day Bailey Course