The University of Texas System. Accountability and Performance Report 2003-2004

The University of Texas System Briefing Book The University of Texas System Board of Regents Accountability and Performance Report 2003-2004 The University of Texas at Arlington l The University of Texas at Austin l The University of Texas at Brownsville l The University of Texas at Dallas l The University of Texas at El Paso l The University of Texas - Pan American l The University of Texas of the Permian Basin l The University of Texas at San Antonio l The University of Texas at Tyler l The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas l The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston l The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio l The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston l The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center l The University of Texas Health Center at Tyler l The University of Texas System Administration

The University of Texas System Accountability and Performance Report 2003-2004 Contents Index of Measures Tables and Figures Highlights Introduction The University of Texas System Mission Statement Governor s Executive Order RP31 Relating to Accountability of Higher Education Systems and Institutions Accountability Context and Framework I. Student Access and Success Values, Goals, Priorities Academic Institutions Health Institutions Implications for Future Planning and Measures for Future Development II. Teaching, Research, and Health Care Excellence Values, Goals, Priorities Academic Institutions Health Institutions Implications for Future Planning and Measures for Future Development III. Service to and Collaborations with Communities Values, Goals, Priorities Academic Institutions Health Institutions Implications for Future Planning and Measures for Future Development IV. Organizational Efficiency and Productivity Values, Goals, Priorities Academic Institutions Health Institutions Implications for Future Planning and Measures for Future Development i

V. Institution Profiles Rankings Overview National and Regional Institutional Rankings Missions and Peer Comparisons Academic Institutions The University of Texas at Arlington The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas at Brownsville The University of Texas at Dallas The University of Texas at El Paso The University of Texas-Pan American The University of Texas of the Permian Basin The University of Texas at San Antonio The University of Texas at Tyler Health Institutions The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center The University of Texas Health Center at Tyler Appendix Sources and Definitions ii

Index of Measures U. T. Academic Institutions Page I. Student Access and Success Section I Undergraduate Participation and Success Number and percent increase of first-time, full-time degree-seeking undergraduates, disaggregated by ethnicity and gender 12 Ethnic composition of first-time, full-time undergraduates compared with composition of high school graduates in state 13 Average ACT/SAT scores of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking undergraduates 15 Number and percent of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking undergraduate from top 10% of their high school class, by ethnicity 16 Number of undergraduate students enrolled on 12 th class day, by ethnicity, gender, and age 18 Number of first-time, part-time undergrads; % first-time, part-time degree-seeking undergrads; % part-time undergrads 21 Total financial aid disaggregated by source 23 Total financial aid and net tuition and fees 24 Percent TEXAS grant funds allocated 24 Number of full-time undergraduate students receiving financial aid and amount awarded 25 Tuition, required fees, and scholarship aid 26 First-year persistence rate for first-time, full-time degree-seeking undergraduates enrolled at this University, by ethnicity, gender 27 Four-, five-, and six-year graduation rates from this University of first-time, full-time freshmen 30 Six-year persistence rates of students enrolled at this University, by ethnicity and gender 32 Four-year graduation rate from this University of transfer/community college students 33 Six-year composite graduation and persistence rates from this or another Texas public university, by ethnicity and gender 34 Number of baccalaureate degrees awarded, by ethnicity and gender 37 Certification exam pass rates of teacher education baccalaureate graduates, by ethnicity and gender 39 Licensure exam pass rates of nursing graduates 42 Licensure exam pass rates of engineering graduates 42 Certification exam pass rates of accounting graduates 42 Student outcomes: satisfaction with teaching 43 Student outcomes: satisfaction with advising 44 Student outcomes: evaluation of overall educational experience 45 Student outcomes: likelihood of attending same institution again 46 Graduate and Professional Students Average GRE scores of entering students 47 Number of graduate and professional students enrolled on the 12 th class day, by ethnicity and gender 47 Number of degrees awarded by level (masters, professional, doctoral), disaggregated by gender and ethnicity 50 Graduate/professional student certification/licensure exam pass rates for law 54 Graduate/professional student certification/licensure exam pass rates for pharmacy 54 Graduate and professional degrees in high priority fields 55 Graduate education degrees conferred 57 Number of graduate and professional programs, by level 58 iii

U. T. Academic Institutions Page II. Teaching, Research, and Health Care Excellence Section II Dollar amount of sponsored (externally funded) research expenditures, by funding source (federal, state, private, local) 5 State appropriations for research as a percent of sponsored (external) research funds expended 7 Number and percent of FTE tenure/tenure-track faculty holding extramural grants 8 Ratio of sponsored research expenditures to FTE tenure/tenure-track faculty 10 Total number of endowed professorships and chairs, number filled, and percent of total tenure/tenure-track faculty 12 Faculty awards 13 Total technology development (inventions, patents, license agreements, public start-up companies, intellectual property income) 15 Number of new invention disclosures 16 Number of patents issued 16 Number of licenses and options executed 16 Net revenue from intellectual property 16 Number of new public start-up companies 16 Number of faculty and staff, by ethnicity and gender 17 FTE student/fte faculty ratio 19 Percent lower division semester credit hours taught by tenure/tenure-track faculty 20 Percent lower division semester credit hours taught by professional faculty 20 Number of postdoctoral fellows 21 Examples of externally funded research collaborations 22 Examples of educational collaborations 25 Faculty salaries and trends 28 Post-tenure review data 30 III. Service to and Collaborations with Communities Section III Contributions to K-12 education, and collaborations with schools and community colleges 3 Examples of economic impact (periodic studies) 12 Examples of collaborations with business, industry, health, public, and community organizations 14 Historically Underutilized Business trends 20 Sources of donor support 21 Alumni giving trends 24 IV. Organizational Efficiency and Productivity Section IV Key operating revenue sources, disaggregated by source (i.e., state appropriations, tuition, etc.) 8 Key operating expenses, disaggregated by purpose 8 Adjusted total revenue (tuition, fees, state appropriations) per FTE student and per FTE faculty 10 Appropriated funds per FTE student and per FTE faculty 12 Total dollar amount of endowment, and ratio per FTE student and per FTE faculty 13 Amount expended for administrative costs as a percent of expenditures 15 Assignable space per FTE student 16 Space utilization rate of classrooms 16 Construction projects total projected cost, number of projects, number of square feet to be added 17 Facility condition index 18 iv

U. T. Health-Related Institutions Page I. Student Access and Success Section I Number of undergrad, grad, and professional students enrolled by school on the 12 th class day, by ethnicity, gender, and level 59 Licensure/certification rate of allied health students 65 National board exam first-time pass rate for dental students 65 National board exam first-time pass rate for medical students 65 National licensure exam pass rates of graduate level nursing students (R.N., and advance practice nursing) 65 Number of degrees awarded, by school, level, ethnicity, and gender 66 Graduation rates of medical, dental, nursing, allied health, public health, and informatics students 73 II. Teaching, Research, and Health Care Excellence Section II Dollar amount of sponsored (externally funded) research expenditures, disaggregated by funding source 32 Amount of sponsored (external) research funds as a percent of formula-derived general appropriations revenue 34 Number and percent of FTE tenure/tenure-track & FTE non-tenure-track research faculty holding extramural grants 35 Ratio of externally funded research expenses to FTE faculty 36 Total number of endowed professorships and chairs, number filled, and percent of total tenure/tenure-track faculty 36 Faculty awards 38 Number of new invention disclosures 40 Number of patents issued 40 Number of licenses and options executed 40 Net revenue from intellectual property 40 Number of new public start-up companies 40 Number of faculty and staff, by ethnicity, and gender 41 FTE student/fte faculty ratio 43 Number of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited resident programs 44 Number of residents in ACGME-accredited programs 44 State-owned and affiliated hospital admissions by U. T. institution faculty 45 State-owned and affiliated hospital days by U. T. institution faculty 45 Clinic visits in state-owned and affiliated facilities treated by U. T. institution faculty 45 Total charges for un-sponsored charity care by faculty in state-owned and affiliated facilities 46 Patient satisfaction ratings 47 Examples of externally funded research collaborations (within U. T. System, and with other U.S. and international collaborators) 48 Examples of educational collaborations 51 Post-tenure review data 55 III. Service to and Collaborations with Communities Section III Examples of collaborations with schools 25 Examples of economic impact (periodic studies) 27 Examples of collaborations with business, health, industry, public, and community organizations 28 Historically Underutilized Business trends 30 Sources of donor support 31 Alumni giving trends 32 Educational programs for non-ut Physicians and medical personnel 33 v

U. T. Health-Related Institutions Page IV. Organizational Efficiency and Productivity Section IV Key operating revenue sources, disaggregated by source (i.e. state appropriations, tuition, etc.) 20 Key operating expenses disaggregated by purpose 20 Ratio of admissions, charity care, hospital days, and clinic visits to General Revenue for state-owned hospital/clinic operations 23 Total dollar amount of endowment, and ratio per FTE student and per FTE faculty 24 Amount expended for administrative costs as a percent of expenditures 25 Net operating margin of faculty practice plans 26 Clinical billings and collections per FTE clinical faculty 26 Expenditures on and number of participants in staff and faculty professional development 27 Ratio of research expenditures to research E&G sq. ft. 28 Facility condition index 28 Construction projects total projected cost, number of projects, # sq. ft. to be added 29 U. T. System V. System Performance Total enrollments, percent increase over previous year I-3 Comparison of total U. T. System enrollment increases with increases for all senior institutions in Texas I-3 Number of total graduates as a percent of total graduates in state I-6 Percent of U. T. Hispanic graduates as % of all Hispanic graduates in state I-8 Percent of U. T. Black graduates as % of all Black graduates in state I-8 Hispanic serving institutions in System I-9 Total sponsored expenses II-3 Total technology development (inventions, patents, license agreements, public start-ups, intellectual property income) II-15 Citizen awareness and satisfaction of U. T. as a System (survey) III-34 Total operating revenue by fund sources IV-3 Total operating expenditures by purpose IV-3 Total expenses for U. T. System Administration IV-4 Number and demographics of System employees (compare with State demographics) IV-4 U. T. System bond rating IV-5 Total patient care revenue IV-22 vi

Tables and Figures Tables Section I Page I-1 Total Enrollment at The University of Texas System, Fall 2002 and Fall 2003 Compared with 2005 Closing the Gaps Target I-2 Student Ethnicity at The University of Texas System, Fall 2002 Enrollments Compared with 2000 and 2005 Closing the Gaps Target I-3 Progress Toward Degrees U.T. System Institutions 6 I-4 Progress Toward High-Priority Undergraduate Degrees, U. T. System Institutions 7 I-5 Undergraduate Degrees and Certificates Awarded to Black and Hispanic Students by U. T. Institutions, 2001-02 I-6 Enrollment of First-time, Full-time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates, U. T. Academic Institutions 12 I-7 First-time, Full-time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates, Percent Female at U. T. Academic Institutions 12 I-8 First-time, Full-time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates, by Percent Ethnicity, U. T. Academic Institutions I-9 Texas High School Graduates by Ethnicity, 2001-2002 Academic Year 14 I-10 Average ACT/SAT Scores of First-time, Full-time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates U. T. Academic Institutions I-11 Number of Top 10 Percent High School Graduates who Applied, Were Admitted, and Enrolled at U. T. Academic Institutions I-12 Percent of First-Time Undergraduates at U. T. Academic Institutions Who Were in the Top Ten Percent of Their High School Graduating Class, by Ethnicity I-13 Total Fall Undergraduate Headcount U. T. Academic Institutions 18 I-14 Undergraduate Gender Composition: Percent Female at U. T. Academic Institutions 19 I-15 Average Undergraduate Age at U. T. Academic Institutions 19 I-16 Part-time Undergraduates, Percent of Total at U. T. Academic Institutions 21 I-17 Part-Time, First-Time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates, Percent of Total U. T. Academic Institutions 22 I-18 Non-Loan Financial Aid Awards and Total Tuition and Fees, U. T. Academic Institutions, FY 2002-03 24 I-19 Texas Grants Awarded as % of Allocation, U. T. Academic Institutions, FY 2002-2003 24 I-20 Undergraduate Financial Aid Awards and Recipients at U. T. Academic Institutions, 2002-03 25 I-21 Undergraduate Tuition, Required Fees, and Scholarship Aid at U. T. Academic Institutions, 2002-2003 I-22 First Year Persistence Rates for First-Time, Full-Time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates at U. T. Academic Institutions I-23 First-Year Persistence Rates for First-Time, Full-Time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates by Gender at U. T. Academic Institutions I-24 First-Year Persistence Rates of First-Time, Full-Time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates by Ethnicity, U. T. Academic Institutions I-25 Undergraduates Graduating in Four Years or Less from Same U. T. Academic Institution, Total 30 I-26 Undergraduates Graduating in Five Years or Less from the Same U. T. Academic Institution, Total 31 I-27 Undergraduates Graduating in Six Years or Less from the Same U. T. Academic Institution, Total 31 I-28 Six Year Graduation Rate from Same U. T. Academic Institution, by Ethnicity 33 I-29 Four-Year Graduation Rates from U. T. Academic Institutions of Undergraduate Transfer Students 33 I-30 Six Year Composite Graduation and Persistence Rates, Students Enrolled at U. T. Academic Institutions in 1995 and 1996 I-31 Six Year Composite Graduation and Persistence Rates by Gender at U. T. Academic Institutions 35 I-32 Six Year Composite Graduation and Persistence Rates by Ethnicity at U. T. Academic Institutions 36 I-33 Baccalaureate Degrees Awarded by U. T. Academic Institutions 37 I-34 Undergraduate Degrees Conferred by Percent Female at U. T. Academic Institutions 37 I-35 Baccalaureate Degree Recipients by Percent Ethnic Composition at U. T. Academic Institutions 38 I-36 Teacher Certification (ExCet Exam) Initial Pass Rates by Ethnicity at U. T. Academic Institutions 40 I-37 ExCet Initial Pass Rates by Gender at U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2002 41 I-38 Licensure Exam Initial Pass Rates for Nursing, Engineering, and Accounting, Baccalaureate Graduates at U. T. Academic Institutions 4 5 8 13 15 16 17 26 27 28 29 34 42 vii

Tables and Figures Tables (continued) Section I Page I-39 Lower-Division Teaching 2003 43 I-40 Upper-Division Teaching 2003 43 I-41 Academic Advising 2003 Academic Institutions 44 I-42 Evaluation of Educational Experience 2002 45 I-43 Evaluation of Educational Experience 2003 45 I-44 Would You Attend the Same Institution Again? 2002 46 I-45 Would You Attend the Same Institution Again? 2003 46 I-46 Average GRE Scores of Entering Graduate Students at U. T. Academic Institutions 47 I-47 Graduate and Professional Headcount U. T. Academic Institutions 47 I-48 Graduate and Professional Students Percent Female at U. T. Academic Institutions 48 I-49 Ethnic Composition of Graduate and Professional Students, U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999 and 2002 I-50 Number of Graduate and First Professional Degrees Conferred by U. T. Academic Institutions AY 1999-2002 I-51 Graduate and First Professional Degrees Conferred by Level at U. T. Academic Institutions 50 I-52 Graduate and First Professional Degrees Conferred, Percent Female at U. T. Academic Institutions 51 I-53 Graduate and First Professional Degrees Conferred by Ethnicity, Percent of Total Enrollments, U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999 and 2002 I-54 Licensure Exam Pass Rates of Law and Pharmacy U. T. Austin Graduates 54 I-55 Graduate and Professional Degrees Conferred in High Priority Fields by U. T. Academic Institutions 55 I-56 Graduate Education Degrees Conferred by U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2002 57 I-57 Number of Graduate and Professional Programs by Level at U. T. System Academic Institutions 58 I-58 Total Undergraduate Enrollment at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, by School 59 I-59 Undergraduate Enrollment at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, by School, Percent Female 59 I-60 Undergraduate Headcount by School, Percent Ethnicity at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, 1999 and 2002 I-61 Graduate and Professional Headcount at U. T. Health-Related Institutions 61 I-62 Graduate and Professional Headcount at U. T. Health-Related Institutions by School Percent Female 61 I-63 Graduate and Professional Student Headcount by Type of Degree and by School, U. T. Health- Related Institutions, 1999-2002 I-64 Graduate and Professional Student Headcount at U. T. Health-Related Institutions by School, Fall 1999 and Fall 2002, Ethnic Composition I-65 Average Licensure Exam Pass Rates of Allied Health, Dentistry, Medicine, and Nursing Graduates U. T. Health-Related Institutions I-66 Total Degrees and Certificates Conferred to Undergraduates at U. T. Health-Related Institutions 66 I-67 Total Certificates and Degrees Conferred, Percent Female, U. T. Health-Related Institutions 66 I-68 Undergraduate Certificates and Degrees Conferred at U. T. Health-Related Institutions by School, 1998-99 and 2001-02, Ethnic Composition I-69 Total Graduate and Professional Certificates and Degrees Awarded at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, 1999-2002 I-70 Total Graduate and Professional Certificates and Degrees Awarded at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, Percent Female I-71 Graduate and Professional Certificates and Degrees Awarded at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, by Level and School I-72 Graduate and Professional Certificates and Degrees Awarded at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, 1998-99 and 2001-02, Ethnic Composition I-73 Graduation Rates for Full-Time Students in U. T. Health-Related Institution Programs 73 49 50 53 60 62 63 65 67 68 69 70 71 viii

Tables and Figures Figures Section I Page I-1 Fall 2003 Enrollments and 2005 Closing the Gaps Targets, Academic Institutions 4 I-2 Fall 2003 Enrollments and 2005 Closing the Gaps Targets, Health-Related Institutions 4 I-3 First-time, Full-time Degree-Seeking Undergraduates at U. T. Academic Institutions, % Ethnicity 2002 I-4 First-Time Students from Top 10% of High School Class Entering U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2002 I-5 Undergraduate Enrollment at U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2002 18 I-6 % Non-white Undergraduates at Academic Institutions, Fall 1999 and 2002 20 I-7 Ethnic Composition of Undergraduates as a Percent of Total Undergraduate Population Fall 2002 at Academic Institutions I-8 Percentage of Part-Time Undergraduates at U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2002 22 I-9 Sources of Student Aid by Type 2002-03 23 I-10 Scholarships and Aid by Source 23 I-11 First Year Persistence Rates at U. T. Academic Institutions, Students Entering 1999-2002 27 I-12 Six Year Graduation Rates of Undergraduates from the Same Institution, U.T. Academic Institutions, Total I-13 Six Year Graduation Rate from Same Institution by Gender Students Enrolled Fall U. T. Academic Institutions, 1996 I-14 Six Year Composite Graduation and Persistence Rates by U. T. Academic Institution 35 I-15 Ethnic Composition of U. T. Academic Institution Undergraduate Degree Recipients, 2002 39 I-16 Student Evaluation of Lower-Division Instruction 2003 44 I-17 Senior Evaluation of Upper-Division Instruction 2003 44 I-18 Student Evaluation of Academic Advising 2003 44 I-19 1 st Yr Student Experience Excellent or Good 45 I-20 Senior Experience Excellent or Good 45 I-21 1 st Yr Would Attend Again 46 I-22 Senior Would Attend Again 46 I-23 Graduate and Professional Student Ethnicity, % of Total Graduate Population, U. T. Academic Institutions, Fall 2002 I-24 Percent of Graduate and First Professional Degrees Conferred to Non-Whites by U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2002 I-25 Ethnic Composition of Recipients of U. T. Academic Institution Graduate and First Professional Degrees I-26 U. T. Health-Related Institution Undergraduate Enrollment, by Ethnicity Fall 2002 60 I-27 Graduate and Professional Enrollment by Ethnic Composition, U. T. Health-Related Institutions 2002 63 I-28 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Undergraduate Certificates and Baccalaureate Degrees Awarded in 2002 by Ethnicity I-29 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Graduate/Professional Certificates and Degrees Awarded in 2002, Ethnic Composition 14 16 20 32 32 49 51 52 68 72 ix

Tables and Figures Tables Section II Page II-1 Total U. T. System Research and Research-Related Expenses 1999-2003 3 II-2 Sponsored (Externally Funded) Research Expenditures by Source 2003 U. T. Academic Institutions 5 II-3 Federal Research Expenditures by Academic Institutions 6 II-4 Appropriated Research Funds as a Percentage of Sponsored Research Funds U. T. Academic Institutions II-5 Faculty Holding Extramural Grants U. T. Academic Institutions 8 II-6 Sponsored Research Expenditures per FTE Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty U. T. Academic Institutions FY 1999-2003 II-7 Endowed Faculty Positions U. T. Academic Institutions 12 II-8 Cumulative Honors U. T. Academic Institutions 13 II-9 Faculty Awards Received in 2002-2003 U. T. Academic Institutions 14 II-10 Aggregate U. T. System Technology Transfer 15 II-11 Patents Issued by U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Top-Ranked Universities 15 II-12 Technology Transfer 2001 and 2002 U. T. Academic Institutions 16 II-13 Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Headcount Professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors, Instructors II-14 Faculty Headcount: All Instructional Ranks 17 II-15 Classified and Non-Classified Staff Headcount U. T. Academic Institutions 18 II-16 FTE Student/FTE Faculty Ratio U. T. Academic Institutions 19 II-17 Faculty Teaching Lower Division Semester Credit Hours 20 II-18 Postdoctoral Fellows U. T. Academic Institutions 21 II-19 Examples of Research Collaborations U. T. Academic Institutions 22 II-20 Examples of Educational Collaborations U. T. Academic Institutions 25 II-21 Average Budgeted Salaries of Instructional Faculty by Rank U. T. Academic Institutions 28 II-22 Average Faculty Salaries in Public Universities, Texas and the Ten Most Populous States, FY 2003 29 II-23 U. T. Academic Institutions Average Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Salaries 29 II-24 Post-Tenure Review U. T. Academic Institutions, AY 2002-2003 30 II-25 Top 10 Texas Public Institutions in Research and Research-Related Expenditures, FY 2002 31 II-26 Total U. T. Health-Related Institution Research and Research-Related Expenses 1999-2003 31 II-27 Total Externally Funded Research Expenditures by Source, U. T. Health-Related Institutions, FY 2003 32 II-28 Federal Research Expenditures by Health-Related Institutions 33 II-29 External Research Expenditures as a Percentage of Formula-Derived General Appropriations Revenue U. T. Health-Related Institutions II-30 Faculty Holding Extramural Grants (All Sources and Types) U. T. Health-Related Institutions 35 II-31 External Research Expenditures per FTE Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty U. T. Health-Related Institutions, FY 2001-2003 II-32 Endowed Faculty Positions U. T. Health-Related Institutions 36 II-33 Cumulative Honors U. T. Health-Related Institutions 38 II-34 Faculty Awards Received 2002-2003 U. T. Health-Related Institutions 38 II-35 Technology Transfer 2001-2003 U. T. Health-Related Institutions 40 II-36 Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty Headcount: Professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors, Instructors II-37 Faculty Headcount: All Instructional Ranks 41 II-38 Classified and Non-Classified Staff Headcount U. T. Health-Related Institutions 42 II-39 FTE Student/FTE Faculty Ratio U. T. Health-Related Institutions 43 II-40 Accredited Resident Programs and Residents at U. T. Health-Related Institutions 44 II-41 State-Owned Hospital Admissions by U. T. Health-Related Institution Faculty 45 II-42 State-Owned and Affiliated Hospital Days by U. T. Health-Related Institution Faculty 45 II-43 Clinic Visits in State-Owned and Affiliated Facilities Treated by U. T. Health-Related Faculty 45 II-44 Total Charges for Un-sponsored Charity Care by Faculty in State-Owned and Affiliated Facilities U. T. Health-Related Institutions II-45 Patient Satisfaction U. T. Health-Related Institutions 47 7 10 17 34 36 41 46 x

Tables and Figures Tables (continued) Section II Page II-46 Examples of Externally Funded Research Collaborations U. T. Health-Related Institutions 48 II-47 Examples of Educational Collaborations U. T. Health-Related Institutions 51 II-48 Post-Tenure Review U. T. Health-Related Institutions 57 Figures II-1 Total Research Expenditures by U. T. System Institutions 1999-2003 3 II-2 National Ranking, Total R&D Expenditures, All Public and Private Universities, FY 1998-2001 4 II-3 Sources of Research Support 2003 5 II-4 Increase in Federal Research Expenditures by U. T. Academic Institutions 1999-2003 6 II-5 % Faculty Holding Extramural Grants 1999-2003, U. T. Academic Institutions 9 II-6 U. T. Academic Institutions Research Expenditures per FTE Faculty, FY 1999-2003 11 II-7 Endowed Positions as % of All Budgeted Tenure/Tenure-Track Positions U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2003 II-8 U. T. Academic Faculty Ethnicity--% Non-White, 1999 and 2002 17 II-9 All U. T. Academic Instructional Ranks Ethnicity % Non-White 1999 and 2002 17 II-10 U. T. Academic Female Faculty as Percent of Total 1999-2002 17 II-11 All U. T. Academic Instructional Ranks Females as Percent of Total, 1999 and 2002 17 II-12 U. T. Academic Institutions Classified Staff Ethnicity FY 2003 18 II-13 U. T. Academic Institutions Non-Classified Staff Ethnicity FY 2003 18 II-14 U. T. Academic Institutions--% Female Employees FY 2003 18 II-15 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Sources of Research Support, FY 2003 32 II-16 Total Federal Research Expenditures U. T. Health-Related Institutions, 1999-2003 33 II-17 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Endowed Positions as % of Budgeted Tenure/Tenure-Track Positions II-18 U. T. Health-Related Faculty Ethnicity -- % Non-White, 1999-2002 41 II-19 All U. T. Health-Related Teaching Ranks Ethnicity--% Non-White 1999 and 2002 41 II-20 U. T. Health-Related Female Faculty as % of Total 1999 and 2002 41 II-21 All U. T. Health-Related Teaching Ranks Females as % of Total, 1999-2002 41 II-22 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Non-Classified Staff Ethnicity, FY 2003 42 II-23 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Classified Staff Ethnicity, FY 2003 42 II-24 U. T. Health-Related Institutions--% Female Employees, FY 2003 42 13 37 xi

Tables and Figures Tables Section III Page III-1 Number of Initially Certified Teachers from U. T. System Institutions, U. T. System and Texas 1993-2002 III-2 Average Percentage of Initially Certified Teachers Graduating from U. T. Institutions Employed in Texas Public Schools after Obtaining Certification III-3 Examples of K-16 Collaborations U. T. Academic Institutions 5 III-4 Economic Impact of U. T. Academic and Health-Related Institutions, Examples from Recent Studies 12 III-5 Examples of Collaborations with Business, Nonprofit, and Community Organizations, U. T. Academic Institutions III-6 System-Wide HUB Trends by Category 18 III-7 HUB Trends U. T. Academic Institutions 20 III-8 U. T. Academic Institutions Among Top 50 State Spending Agencies, FY 2003 20 III-9 U. T. Academic Institutions Among Top 25 State Spending Agencies of Over $5 Million FY 2003 20 III-10 Summary of Giving Trends: Sources of Donor Support 21 III-11 Total Voluntary Support/Highest 25/FY2002 22 III-12 Sources of Donor Support by U. T. Academic Institution 23 III-13 Examples of K-16 Collaborations U. T. Health-Related Institutions 25 III-14 Examples of Collaborations with Business, Nonprofit, and Community Organizations, U. T. Health- Related Institutions III-15 HUB Trends by Institution, U. T. Health-Related Institutions 30 III-16 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Among Top 50 State Spending Agencies FY 2003 30 III-17 Sources of Donor Support by U. T. Health-Related Institution 31 III-18 Educational Programs for Non-U.T. Physicians and Medical Personnel, U. T. Health-Related Institutions III-19 Attitudes about the U. T. System value, importance to the economy, and accessibility 34 III-20 National attitudes about higher education 35 4 4 14 28 33 Figures III-1 Number of Initially Certified Teachers from The University of Texas System Institutions and All Texas Educator Preparation Institutions (1993-2002) III-2 U. T. System HUB Expenditures by Category, FY 1999-FY 2003 19 III-3 Sources of Donor Support U. T. System, FY 2003 22 III-4 Alumni Support Trends at U. T. Academic Institutions, 1999-2003 24 III-5 U. T. Austin Alumni Support 1999-2003 24 III-6 Alumni Support Trends at U. T. Health-Related Institutions, 1999-2003 32 3 xii

Tables and Figures Tables Section IV Page IV-1 Key Revenues and Expenses U. T. System 3 IV-2 Total Expenses for U. T. System Administration Operations 4 IV-3 U. T. System Administration Staff Demographic Composition, FY 2003 4 IV-4 U. T. System Bond Rating 2002 and 2003 5 IV-5 Key Revenues and Expenses U.T. Academic Institutions 7 IV-6 Key Revenues and Expenses by Source and Purpose U. T. Academic Institutions 8 IV-7 Adjusted Revenue per FTE Student, U. T. Academic Institutions 10 IV-8 Adjusted Revenue per FTE Faculty, U. T. Academic Institutions 10 IV-9 Appropriated Funds per FTE Student U. T. Academic Institutions 12 IV-10 Appropriated Funds per FTE Faculty U. T. Academic Institutions 12 IV-11 U. T. System Endowments 13 IV-12 Amount Expended for Administrative Costs as a Percent of Expenses U. T. Academic Institutions 15 IV-13 Assignable Space per Student FY 2003 U. T. Academic Institutions 16 IV-14 Space Utilization of Classrooms FY 2003 U. T. Academic Institutions 16 IV-15 Construction Projected for FY 2004 FY 2009 U. T. Academic Institutions 17 IV-16 Facilities Condition Index FY 2003 U. T. Academic Institutions 18 IV-17 Key Revenues and Expenses U. T. Health-Related Institutions 19 IV-18 Key Revenues and Expenses by Source and Purpose U. T. Health-Related Institutions 20 IV-19 Total U. T. System Patient Care Revenue U. T. Health-Related Institutions 22 IV-20 Hospital and Clinic Service in Relation to Hospital General Revenue????? 23 IV-21 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Value of Endowments 24 IV-22 Amount Expended for Administrative Costs as a Percent of Expenses, U. T. Health-Related Institutions IV-23 Net Operating Margin of Faculty Practice Plans, U. T. Health-Related Institutions 26 IV-24 U. T. Health-Related Institutions, Gross Clinical Billings and Net Collections Per Clinical Faculty 26 IV-25 Staff and Faculty Professional Development FY 2003 U. T. Health-Related Institutions 27 IV-26 Research Space FY 2003 U. T. Health-Related Institutions 28 IV-27 Facilities Condition Index FY 2003 U.T. Health-Related Institutions 28 IV-28 Construction Projected for FY 2004 FY 2009 U. T. Health-Related Institutions 29 25 Figures IV-1 U. T. Academic Institution Revenue by Source FY 2003 9 IV-2 U. T. Academic Institutions Expenses by Purpose FY 2003 9 IV-3 U. T. Academic Institutions Adjusted Revenue per FTE Faculty FY 1999-2003 11 IV-4 U. T. Academic Institutions Adjusted Revenue per FTE Student FY 1999-2003 11 IV-5 U. T. Academic Institutions, Endowments per FTE Student FY 99 and FY 03 14 IV-6 U. T. Academic Institutions, Endowments per FTE Faculty FY 99 and FY 03 15 IV-7 U. T. Health-Related Institutions, Revenues by Source FY 2003 21 IV-8 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Expenses by Purpose FY 2003 21 IV-9 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Endowments per FTE Student FY 03 24 IV-10 U. T. Health-Related Institutions Endowments per FTE Faculty FY 03 24 xiii

Tables and Figures Tables Section V Page V-1 U. T. Academic Institutions--National Institutional Rankings Summary 3 V-2 U. T. Health-Related Institutions--National Institutional Rankings Summary 6 V-3 Top American Research Universities, University of Texas Institutions, Overview of 2003 and 2002 National Rankings V-4 Recent Top Programs in National Rankings 16 15 U. T. Arlington V-5 Comparative and Aspirational Peer Institutions and their Comparative Data 27 V-6 National Peer Institutions and Their Comparison Data 31 U. T. Brownsville V-7 Comparisons 35 V-8 Number of Students Served 35 V-9 Income of Region Served 36 V-10 Percent of Minority Students 36 V-11 Demographic Profile of Students 37 V-12 Percentage of Students Needing Developmental Education 38 V-13 Total Number of Degrees Conferred by Level 38 V-14 Six-Year Graduation Rate for First-Time, Full-Time Undergraduate Bachelors Enrolled in Fall 1995 39 V-15 Size of Budget 39 V-16 Ratio of Full-Time Faculty to Students by Semester 40 V-17 Ratio of Full-Time to Part-Time Faculty 41 V-18 Staff 41 V-19 Research Effort and Sponsored Programs 42 U. T. Dallas Table V-20 Comparative and Aspirational Institutions 50 U. T. Dallas -- Figures V-1 State Appropriations Per FTE Student 45 V-2 Total Revenue Per FTE Student 45 V-3 25 th and 75 th SAT Percentiles for UTD and Aspirational and Comparator Universities, 2001 46 V-4 Federally Financed Research Per T/TT Faculty 46 V-5 Six-Year Graduation Rate (2001) 47 V-6 Total Research Expenditures Per T/TT Faculty 47 V-7 Federally Financed Research Per T/TT Faculty 48 V-8 UTD and Comparator and Aspirational Universities Student Faculty Ratios, 2001 48 V-9 FTE Students/FTE Faculty for UTD and Comparator and Aspirational Universities 49 V-10 PHD Awarded/FTE Faculty for UTD and Comparator and Aspirational Universities 49 U. T. El Paso V-21 Federal/State Research and Development Expenditure Ranking 56 V-22 Top 10 Baccalaureate Origin Institutions of Hispanic Science and Engineering Doctorate Recipients: 1997-2001 V-23 Peer Institutions 2001-02 Benchmarking Data 60 56 xiv

Tables and Figures Tables (continued) Section V Page U. T. Pan American V-24 Current Status Peers: In-State 67 V-25 Current Status Peers: Out-of-State 67 V-26 Current Status Peers: In-State 67 V-27 Current Status Peers: Out-of-State 68 V-28 Aspirational Peer Institutions: In-State 68 V-29 Aspirational Institutions: Out-of-State 68 U. T. Permian Basin Tables V-30 Resource Indicators 75 V-31 Research Indicators 75 V-32 Enrollment Distribution 76 V-33 Access and Success Indicators 76 V-34 Selection Indicators 77 U. T. Permian Basin Figures V-11 State Appropriations Per FTE Student 74 V-12 Total Revenue Per FTE Student 74 V-13 Student Faculty Ratio (Students per Faculty) 74 V-14 Total Research Expenditures Per T/TT Faculty 74 V-15 Access and Success 74 V-16 Six-Year Graduation Rate 74 U. T. San Antonio V-35 Institutional Peers 81 U. T. Tyler V-36 U. T. Tyler Comparator Institutions 85 U. T. Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas V-37 Medical School Peer Institution Comparisons 91 V-38 Allied Health Sciences School Peer Institution Medical School Comparisons 92 U. T. Medical Branch - Galveston V-39 Peers 95 U. T. Health Science Center Houston V-40 Comparative Peer Institutions 101 V-41 Aspirational Peer Institutions 101 V-42 Comparative and Aspirational Peer Institutions 102 U. T. Health Science Center San Antonio V-43 Total of NIH Extramural Awards as reported on NIH Web-site 104 V-44 Total Dollar Amount of Research Grants 104 V-45 Number of Degrees Conferred 104 V-46 Faculty/Student Ratio, Total Full-time Faculty 104 V-47 Total Students 104 V-48 Practice Plan Revenue 105 V-49 Charity Care Delivered 105 V-50 Comparison of Public Data for Comparative Universities, Aspirational Universities, and HSC-SA 105 xv

Tables and Figures Tables (continued) Section V Page V-51 Operating Budget for Allied Health Programs at All U.S. Academic Health Centers, and Southern Academic Health Centers as Compared to HSC-SA for AY 2002-03 V-52 Comparison of Federal Grant Dollars Received from All Academic Health Centers, Southern Association of Academic Health Centers, and HSC-SA V-53 Total Extramural Income by Program for All Academic Health Centers, Southern Academic Health Centers, and HSC-SA V-54 FTE Faculty Per Allied Health Program for National and Southern Academic Health Centers as Compared to HSC-SA V-55 Mean Number of Allied Health Students: Mean Percent of Minority Students Enrolled at All, Southern, and HSC-SA Academic Health Centers V-56 Average Student to Faculty Ratios by Program for All, Southern, and HSC-SA Academic Health Centers V-57 Average Cost per Allied Health Student for All, Southern, and HSC-SA Academic Health Centers 107 V-58 HSC-SA Peer Institutions 108 V-59 HSC-SA Peer Institutions Medical School 108 V-60 HSC-SA Peer Institutions Graduate School 108 105 106 106 106 107 107 U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center V-61 Institutional Comparisons 110 V-62 U. T. Health Data Benchmarks 111 U. T. Health Center Tyler V-63 Comparative and Aspirational Peer Institutions 114 xvi

The University of Texas System Accountability and Performance Report 2003-04 Highlights Index Introduction... 1 Student Access and Success... 2 Teaching, Research, and Health Care Excellence... 8 Service to and Collaborations with Communities... 14 Organizational Efficiency and Productivity... 18 Institutional Profiles... 24 Introduction This new, annual report provides an accountability framework for The University of Texas System Board of Regents, U. T. System offices and institutions, the Legislature, and the public. The report s framework is derived from the U. T. System s planning context, based on state, regional, and local needs, including those identified in the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board s Closing the Gaps higher education master plan. The report focuses on data related to System goals and priorities articulated in its long-range plan, Service to Texas in the 21 st Century, and individual institution missions, longrange plans, goals, and priorities. This new framework reflects the U. T. System s ongoing commitment to foster continuous improvement, good management, and transparency within the component institution and System functions that contribute to its academic, health care, and service missions. The report provides information and analysis that demonstrate how U.T. institutions add value, contribute to state goals, and how they compare with peers. It emphasizes results and implications for future planning, to support continued improvement by the System and component institutions. As a new endeavor, the data displayed in the first edition of this report provide a baseline of institutional performance; multi-year information is displayed where available to establish trend lines. Each institution will develop performance targets, which will be included in the next editions of this report, as a point of comparison to the trend lines in performance on the selected list of indicators identified here. The report will provide the basis for reviewing institutions and establishing benchmarks for future performance. It will be used by the System in conjunction with other documents such as each of the institution s Compact and each president s Presidential Work Plan, to evaluate performance and establish expectations of each institution. The U. T. System expects this report to be used as an almanac and ready reference on broad trends in institutional performance and to support management decision making and planning. It will highlight key issues, successes, and topics that require attention, and contribute to future goal setting, but will not substitute for the more detailed planning information, fact books, and web-based resources available from each institution. Data in this report come from System and legislatively mandated reports, including annual data provided to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Legislative Budget Board, and from other information gathered from U. T. System institutions. The goal is to integrate and focus the information previously disseminated through several different performance reports. The report emphasizes results and the service the U. T. System provides to Texas. Performance measures provide a 360-degree, longitudinal view of activities that support the educational, research, and health care missions of U. T. institutions. These measures are organized in five main sections: I. Student Access and Success; II. Teaching, Research, and Heath Care Excellence; III. Service to and Collaborations with Communities; IV. Organizational Efficiency and Productivity; V. Institutional Profiles (including rankings and other comparisons with peer institutions). Within this framework, measures are tailored to the specific missions of academic and health-related institutions, with considerable overlap in types of measures: The University of Texas System Accountability and Performance Report Highlights 1

Academic Institutions 69 measures Health-Related Institutions 48 measures System 15 measures Approximately half of all measures are outcome- or input-related. Others provide context, or track progress that ultimately translates into outcomes. The period of reporting is FY 1999 to FY 2003, as longitudinal data are available. (Basic, preliminary fall 2003 enrollment data are noted, below.) Each section of the report includes a discussion of implications for future planning and measures for future development. Comparisons to peer institu- tions are based on a selection of measures used in this report. Analysis of trend data and comparisons will be used to set future performance targets and identify areas of strength and areas where improvement is needed. This summary highlights key findings, but does not cover every performance measure for every institution. Readers are encouraged to consult the full report for an index of all measures and complete detail about each institution. Student Access and Success The U. T. System Contributions to Closing the Gaps Goals Enrollment. 177,944 students were enrolled in the U. T. System in fall 2003 (12 th day count). This represents 37.6 percent of all public university enrollments, 15.5 percent of all public and private higher education enrollments, and 75 percent of all health institution enrollments, and in Texas. This was nearly a 5 percent increase over fall 2002 enrollments, about the same as the statewide increase of 4.92 percent. Although the THECB does not set targets for university systems, collectively fall 2003 enrollments in the U. T. System exceeded by 2,500 students the aggregate enrollment projection of 175,442 for 2005. Fall 2003 Enrollments and 2005 Closing the Gaps Targets U. T. System Health-Related Institutions 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 SWMC UTMB HSC-H HSC-SA MDACC Fall 2003 Closing the Gaps 2005 Target Fall 2003 Enrollments and 2005 Closing the Gaps Targets U.T. System Academic Instituitons 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Fall 2003 UTA UT- Austin UTB UTD UTEP UTPA UTPB UTSA UTT Closing the Gaps 2005 Target Diversity. At all U. T. academic institutions and all but one health-related institution, the number of Black and Hispanic students increased between 2000 and 2002. U. T. El Paso, U. T. Pan American, U. T. San Antonio, U. T. Brownsville, and U. T. Austin were among the top 25 institutions with the greatest increase in Hispanic students. % Non-white Undergraduates at Academic Institutions Fall 1999 and 2002 100% 89% 88% 91% 80% 60% 40% 20% 39% 45% 93% 35% 38% 95% 38% 45% 86% 33% 41% 57% 60% 15% 17% 51% 55% 0% UTA 1999 2002 Austin UTB UTD UTEP UTPA UTPB UTSA UTT System The University of Texas System Accountability and Performance Report Highlights 2

Degrees awarded. In 2002, U. T. institutions conferred 20,877 degrees, a 4.8 percent increase over 2000. These represent 26.5 percent of all degrees conferred by public institutions in Texas in 2002. Between 2000 and 2002, the overall state total production of doctoral degrees declined; at U. T. institutions, the total decreased from 1,065 in 2000 to 1,009 in 2002. In high-priority fields (as defined by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board) in 2002, U. T. institutions conferred 2,923 degrees and certificates in high-priority technical fields; 2,198 degrees in high-priority health fields, and 3,329 graduate-level education degrees. Degrees awarded to Black and Hispanic students. U. T. institutions conferred 7.8 percent of the undergraduate degrees received by Black students in 2002. U. T. institutions conferred 26 percent of the degrees received by Hispanic students in 2002. U. T. Hispanic-Serving Institutions. The presence of Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) in a university system is another indicator of its contributions to promoting access to students from diverse backgrounds. The U. T. System includes six Hispanic-Serving Institutions: U. T. Brownsville, U. T. El Paso, U. T. Pan American, U. T. Permian Basin, U. T. San Antonio, and U. T. Health Science Center-San Antonio. No other public, four-year system in the country, except the California State University System, includes this number of HSIs. The CSU System includes nine HSIs (of 24 total universities); the Texas A&M University System includes three HSIs (of 10 total universities); and the City University of New York has four (of 11). The Texas State University System, the University of Houston, and the New Mexico State University System each have one HSI. U. T. Academic Institutions Undergraduate Student Performance Measures Enrollment of first-time, full-time degree-seeking undergraduates. Between fall 1998 and 2001, undergraduate enrollment increased by 20.5 percent to 16,554. On average, first-time students are 52 percent female; at Brownsville and Tyler, students are over 60 percent female. Between fall 1998 and 2002, the proportion of non-white students increased from 52 percent to 56 percent. Ethnic composition of first-time, full-time undergraduates compared with general high school graduate ethnic composition. Overall, 44 percent of first-time, full-time U. T. undergraduates in fall 2001 were White, 35 percent were Hispanic, 12 percent were Asian, 4.5 percent were Black, and 4 percent were International. Statewide, 49.9 percent of high school graduates in 2002 were White, 33.1 percent Hispanic, 13.3 percent Black, and 3.4 Asian. U. T. institutions collectively exceeded the statewide proportion of Hispanic students, who comprise the majority of students at U. T. Brownsville, U. T. El Paso, and U. T. Pan American. U. T. institutions collectively lagged behind the state-wide enrollment of Blacks (4.5 percent to 13.3 percent) except at U. T. Arlington, where 13.5 percent of first-time, fulltime students were Black, slightly above the state average among high school graduates. Top-10 percent high school graduates enrolled at U. T. institutions (contextual measure). Between fall 1999 and 2002, the proportion of top-10 percent students increased at U. T. Austin, U. T. Dallas, and U. T. El Paso. Although the proportion declined over this four-year period, over 15 percent of students enrolled in fall 2002 at Arlington, Permian Basin, and Tyler came from the top 10 percent of their high school class. Total fall undergraduate headcount and demographic trends. Enrollment increased at every U. T. academic institution between fall 1999 and 2002, from a total of 106,434 to 121,335. Fifty-four percent of all undergraduates were female in fall 2002; at U. T. Brownsville, U. T. Permian Basin, and U. T. Tyler, females outnumber male students by nearly two to one. The average age of students has changed little since 1999; students average 21 years old at U. T. Austin; 23 at U. T. El Paso, U. T. Pan American, U. T. Brownsville, and U. T. Permian Basin; and 27 to 28 years old at U. T. Tyler. The proportion of non-white students increased at every U. T. academic institution between fall 1999 and 2002. In fall 2002, 45 percent of undergraduates were White; 35 percent Hispanic; 10 percent Asian, and 5 percent Black. U. T. Brownsville (94 percent), U. T. El Paso (74 percent), and U. T. Pan American (87 percent) serve the largest proportion of Hispanic students; U. T. Permian Basin (35 percent) and U. T. San Antonio (48 percent) also serve large proportions of Hispanic students. Part-time students (contextual measure). Part-time students comprise a significant portion of undergraduate enrollments 25.5 percent in 2002; over time this ratio has decreased. Nationally, an average 22 percent of undergraduates enrolled at four-year institutions attend part time. Institutions with comparatively more part-time students include U. T. Brownsville (67.3 percent); U. T. Dallas (43 percent); and U. T. Permian Basin (37.7 percent). U. T. Austin has the least (11.6 percent). However, comparatively few first-time degree students begin part-time 5.1 percent overall in fall 2002. This contrasts with the national average of 21 percent for first-time degree students. The University of Texas System Accountability and Performance Report Highlights 3