FORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS)

Similar documents
Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron

Skoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)

Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

CASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

LATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

Supplementary restraints system

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

CRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Contents. 1. What types of car restraints are available? Buying a car child seat- checklist Tips for fitting car seats 6

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL

A name a commitment! These are the criteria which have characterized the development of dependable everyday cars up to the present time.

Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests


RCAR Low-speed structural crash test protocol

Child in Car Safety Leaflet 1/8/07 8:54 am Page 1 Child In Car Safety

SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS

NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

Automotive Collision Injury Form

Airbags and Pretensioners. Emergency Response Guide

Existing safety technology is the driverless vehicle already here? Matthew Avery Safety Research Director

Secure Them for Life. Child safety seats. From infant seats to seat belts, everything you need to know to ensure your child s safety.

UNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S. What every driver and passenger should know

MITSUBISHI MOT PROTECTION YOUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Mercedes-Benz Vito. Specifications

Event Data Recorder - Reference Document

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

Sources of data. IIHS MDB (SUV) Side Impact Test at 50km/h (from 2003) NHTSA Crabbed MDB Side Impact Test at 62 km/h (from 1997)

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

CRASH PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN IN AMBULANCES Recommendations and Procedures* Marilyn J. Bull, M.D., Kathleen Weber, Judith Talty, Miriam Manary

SEAT BELT Installation Manual

BILLING INFORMATION. Address: City, State, Zip: Telephone Number: Date of Injury: Time of Injury: AM PM City and street where crash occurred:

Red Oak Fire Rescue SECTION: New Car Technology

Buckle Up! A Lesson on Car Seat Safety Playgroup #11

INCREASING MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE

EMERGENCY SERVICES. Component Location and Safety Document. X-TYPE my Onwards

Best Practice Guide Vehicle Ergonomics Best Practice Guide

Accident Analysis Methodology and Development of Injury Scenarios

Child Safety in Cars. Federal Highway Research Institute

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

climate unit for the passenger compartment.

Virginia's Child Passenger Safety Laws

2006 Cadillac STS/STS-V Owner Manual M

Vehicle Safety Systems

Injury Criteria for Q Dummies in Frontal Impact

Motor Vehicle Collision Form

Auto Accident Description

Talking Points. About Roadway Users

Emergency Response Guide

How To Write Off A Car

A Systematic Approach for Improving Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes

Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP May 2014 Agenda Items 15

US FMVSS 202 Final Rule

Thorsten Adolph, Marcus Wisch, Andre Eggers, Heiko Johannsen, Richard Cuerden, Jolyon Carroll, David Hynd, Ulrich Sander

Center for Pet Safety 2013 Harness Crashworthiness Study Summary Report

2005 Chevrolet Equinox Owner Manual M

CHILD BOOSTER SEAT. Instructions for Installation & Use Series No. 4050/A/2013 IMPORTANT: KEEP THIS BOOK IN THE PLACE PROVIDED ON THE CHILD RESTRAINT

4008 FEATURES AND SPECIFICATIONS

OWNER S MANUAL. ProMaster

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

2009 Chevrolet Aveo Owner Manual M

ASK THE CAR WHAT HAPPENED

COMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS

2005 Chevrolet Cavalier Owner Manual M

A Parent s Guide to Car Seats

A Guide to Selecting and Fitting Child Restraints

ANCIS. The Australian National Crash In-depth Study. David Logan (MUARC)

PERSONAL SAFETY child passenger safety

This owner s manual should be considered a permanent part of the vehicle and should remain with the vehicle when it is sold.

INDUSTRY REPORT ON AIRBAG INDUSTRY

Product Overview. Restraint systems. Flooring systems. Seating systems. Solar systems

Airbag recall resources for vehicle crashworthy victims & their families

OPEL CORSA UTILITY BASE

SAMPLE POLICY ON THE USE OF COMPANY VEHICLES. 1. Purpose: To set out policy of The Company with regard to the use of company vehicles.

Transcription:

FORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS) 20.75 max. 49.00 Child Ford Figo, RHD 4 door hatchback 1,274 kg 18 month old Child Maxi Cosi Cabrio Fix Protected / Good 0+ Belted RWF 3 year old Child Maxi Cosi Priori XP Vulnerable/ Good 1 Belted FWF Front seatbelt pretensioners frontal airbag frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags knee airbag ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver head was poor and for this reason the star capping was applied s and passenger s chest protection was weak. The passengers knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard lie the Tran fascia tube. The bodyshell was rated as stable. CHILD OCCUPANT The child seat for the 3 year old child was unable to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact. The dynamic performance of the child restraints was adequate. However, the installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The recommended CRS for the 3 year old dummy was found to be incompatible with the belt system on the vehicle, while the CRS for the 18 months dummy was. This vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag. FRONTAL IMPACT TEST UN R94 AT 56km/h: PASS BODYSHELL INTEGRITY: STABLE

Hyundai i10 (NO AIRBAGS) 6.97 max. 49.00 Child Hyundai i10, RHD 4 door city car 1,116 kg 18 month old Child Maxi Cosi Cabrio Fix Protected / Fair 0+ Belted RWF 3 year old Child Maxi Cosi Priori Protected / Poor 1 Belted FWF Front seatbelt pretensioners frontal airbag frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags knee airbag ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver head was poor and for this reason the star capping was applied s chest protection was poor, Passenger s chest protection was marginal. The front passengers knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard lie the Tran fascia tube. The bodyshell was rated as unstable. The bodyshell was not capable of withstanding any further loading CHILD OCCUPANT The child seat for the 3 year old child was unable to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact. The 3 years old dummy presented high loading in its chest and head. Both dummies heads contacted the front backrests. The recommended CRS for the 3 year old dummy was found to be incompatible with the belt system on the vehicle, while the CRS for the 18 months dummy did not show incompatibility. The installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag. NOTE: Child Occupant protection score might be updated due to P3 dummy data FRONTAL IMPACT TEST UN R94 AT 56km/h: NOT PASS BODYSHELL INTEGRITY: STABLE

Volkwagen Polo (NO AIRBAGS) 26.97 max. 49.00 Child VW Polo, RHD 4 door hatchback 1,259 kg 18 month old Child Bobsy G0 plus Protected / Fair 0+ Belted RWF 3 year old Child Bobsy G1 plus Protected / Poor 1 Belted FWF Front seatbelt pretensioners frontal airbag frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags knee airbag ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver head was poor due to the hard contact with the steering wheel and for this reason the star capping was applied. Also Diver s neck recived weak protection s chest protection was poor due to its high compression, Passenger s head protection was good, and its chest protection was adequate. Both front passengers knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard lie the Tran fascia tube. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it can withstanding further loading which is a critical baseline to add airbags. CHILD OCCUPANT The child seat for the 3 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and presented high chest decelerations. The belted CRS for the 11/2 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and protected adequately well the child. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. This vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag. FRONTAL IMPACT TEST UN R94 AT 56km/h: NOT PASS BODYSHELL INTEGRITY: STABLE

Suzuki Maruti Alto (NO AIRBAGS) 17.57 max. 49.00 Child Suzuki Maruti Alto 800, RHD 4 door city car 924 kg 18 month old Child Chicco Autofix Protected / Good 0+ Belted RWF 3 year old Child Chicco Eletta Protected / Fair 1 Belted FWF Front seatbelt pretensioners frontal airbag frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags knee airbag ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver head was poor due to the hard contact with the steering wheel and for this reason the star capping was applied. Also Diver s neck received poor protection s chest protection was poor due to its high compression, Passenger s chest protection was adequate. Both front passengers knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard lie the Tran fascia tube. The bodyshell was rated as unstable. CHILD OCCUPANT The child seat for the 3 year old child was unable to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact. The dynamic performance of the child restraints was adequate. However, the installation instructions on both child seats were insufficient and not permanently attached to the seat. The recommended CRS did not show incompatibilities with the belt system on the vehicle. This vehicle was not equipped with a passenger airbag. FRONTAL IMPACT TEST UN R94 AT 56km/h: NOT PASS BODYSHELL INTEGRITY: UNSTABLE

Tata Nano (NO AIRBAGS) 0.00 max. 49.00 Child Tata Nano, RHD 4 door city car 887 kg 18 month old Child N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 year old Child N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front seatbelt pretensioners frontal airbag frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags knee airbag ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver head, neck, chest was poor due to the hard contact with the steering wheel as well as for the high descelerations and for this reason the star capping was applied. Also Passenger s chest protection was marginal. Both front passengers knees could impact with dangerous structures, in the dashboard lie the Tran fascia tube, also the shock absorber mounts are offer potential risk. The bodyshell was rated as unstable and it can not withstanding further loadings. CHILD OCCUPANT The manufacturer did not recommend a CRS for this test. Global NCAP has to recommend a CRS instead but this car has 2 point static belts in the rear seat. Global NCAP could not find a CRS that is available in India and that is possible to be used in a 2 point belt. As it is not possible to find a CRS to be used, according to Indian market availability criteria this model is not capable of transporting children in a safe way. FRONTAL IMPACT TEST UN R94 AT 56km/h: NOT PASS BODYSHELL INTEGRITY: UNSTABLE

Volkwagen Polo (TWO AIRBAGS) 12.54 max. 17.00 Adult 29.91 max. 49.00 Child VW Polo, RHD 4 door hatchback 1,272 kg 18 month old Child Bobsy G0 plus Protected / Fair 0+ Belted RWF 3 year old Child Bobsy G1 plus Protected / Poor 1 Belted FWF Front seatbelt pretensioners frontal airbag frontal airbag Side body airbags Side head airbags knee airbag ADULT OCCUPANT The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good thanks to the airbag, s and passenger chest recived adequate protection. Both front passengers knees could impact with dangerous structures in the dashboard lie the Tran fascia tube. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it can withstanding further loading which is a critical baseline to add airbags. CHILD OCCUPANT The child seat for the 3 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact. The belted CRS for the 11/2 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and protected adequately well the child. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. The car did give warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active aribag but its marking is not enough to meet the protocol criteria. FRONTAL IMPACT TEST UN R94 AT 56km/h: PASS BODYSHELL INTEGRITY: STABLE