PJM Seams Update: Day-Ahead M2M Revisions to MISO- PJM Joint Operating Agreement



Similar documents
Firm Flow Entitlement on M2M Flowgates Readers' Guide. Last Updated: February 01, 2016 Version: 4.0

Market Solutions to Loop Flow

PJM LMP Market Overview

Convergence Bidding Tutorial & Panel Discussion

Two Settlement - Virtual Bidding and Transactions

Presentation for The National Commission for Energy State Regulation of Ukraine

PJM Overview of Markets. Georgian Delegation PUCO Office April 11, 2013

Table of Contents. Real-Time Reliability Must Run Unit Commitment and Dispatch (Formerly G-203) Operating Procedure

PJM Overview and Wholesale Power Markets. John Gdowik PJM Member Relations

PI.'s"'1-SlttlllIl. bstili

The Power Market: E-Commerce for All Electricity Products By Edward G. Cazalet, Ph.D., and Ralph D. Samuelson, Ph.D.

Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

Key Take Away : There are 4 types of MISO transmission transactions : 1) Drive- In, 2) Drive-Within, 3) Drive-through, and 4) Drive-Out

An Overview of the Midwest ISO Market Design. Michael Robinson 31 March 2009

Energy in the Wholesale Market December 5, :30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Irving, Texas Robert Burke, Principal Analyst ISO New England

Interjurisdictional Energy Trading. IESO Training

INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO)

Generation and Transmission Interconnection Process

Update on Northeast Seams Issues. January 9, 2008 NYISO Management Committee Meeting

Responsibility for Outage Coordination is designated by 4 key artifacts: 1. FERC Order 2000 FERC Order 2000 (Docket No. RM ; Order No.

Multi-Faceted Solution for Managing Flexibility with High Penetration of Renewable Resources

How To Understand The Benefits Of The French Power Market Plan

Section 4: Scheduling Philosophy & Tools

Robust Adaptive Topology Control

Optimizing Wind Generation in ERCOT Nodal Market Resmi Surendran ERCOT Chien-Ning Yu ABB/Ventyx Hailong Hui ERCOT

Real-time Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch and Commitment in the PJM : Experiences and Challenges

How To Settle Day Ahead Energy, Loss, And Loss For A Day Ahead Market

Aliso Canyon Gas-Electric Coordination. Straw Proposal

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Wind Power and Electricity Markets

Virtual Transactions in the PJM Energy Markets

CALIFORNIA ISO. Pre-dispatch and Scheduling of RMR Energy in the Day Ahead Market

Table of Contents. Purpose. Eldorado Intertie and System (Eldorado- Four Corners) Scheduling. Operating Procedure

Preliminary Project Description

Enabling 24/7 Automated Demand Response and the Smart Grid using Dynamic Forward Price Offers

Introduction to the Integrated Marketplace

Performance Metrics. For Independent System Operators And Regional Transmission Organizations

Ms. Rae McQuade President & COO, North American Energy Standards Board

PAC7 Customer Specific Procedure

Generator Optional. Timeline including the next steps. A practical example. Potential benefits of OFA? Key implications. How might OFA work?

Consistency of Energy-Related Opportunity Cost Calculations

FI/RU electricity exchange area setup

Operator Initiated Commitments in RTO and ISO Markets

Appendix A. Glossary. For Request For Proposals For Long-Term Renewable Generation Resources for Entergy Louisiana, LLC

Winter Impacts of Energy Efficiency In New England

COMMENTS OF THE SOLAR ALLIANCE NEW JERSEY INTERCONNECTION RULES APRIL 29 TH, 2011

Uplift in RTO and ISO Markets

A Guide to Inform Institutions about Participation in PJM s Demand Response Programs

Nodal Exchange Contract Specifications

Status of Demand Response in Europe. Jessica Stromback, Smart Energy Demand Coalition EPFL Lausanne Switzerland Sept 10 th, 2015

Demand Response Programs: Lessons from the Northeast

Review of PJM s Market Power Mitigation Practices in Comparison to Other Organized Electricity Markets

ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (March 2014) ERCOT Public April 15, 2014

Energy Management System (EMS) Model Updates and Quality Assurance (QA)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

124 FERC 61,317 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Communication Protocols for Public Utilities ORDER NO.

process is usually performed with an additional SCUC and has been the natural fit for the use of wind power forecasts. Currently, however, since this

The Locational Based Marginal Prices ( LBMPs or prices ) for Suppliers and Loads in

>

Workshop B. 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Demand Response Review

Dynamic Thermal Ratings in Real-time Dispatch Market Systems

Comparison of Market Designs

Transcription:

PJM Seams Update: Day-Ahead M2M Revisions to MISO- PJM Joint Operating Agreement Asanga Perera Market-to-Market Lead Market Implementation Committee August 12, 2015

Purpose Overview This presentation provides an informational update on projected MISO-PJM Joint Operating Agreement (JOA) revisions Key Takeaway PJM intends to file a MISO-PJM JOA enhancement by August 31, 2015 This enhancement is designed to accommodate MISO-PJM Day-Ahead (DA) Firm Flow Entitlement (FFE) exchange implementation 2

Background In the Joint and Common Markets (JCM) efforts, MISO and PJM have been discussing an initiative to exchange FFEs in DA This initiative will enhance RTOs DA M2M coordination practices and their Real- Time (RT) M2M settlement payments According to the JOA provisions, currently for projected M2M Flowgates, RTOs limit each others market flows to their FFEs RTOs have discovered that there could be an opportunity to exchange unused FFEs in a DA basis for targeted M2M Flowgates in an attempt to: Minimize Joint Bid Production Cost - Overall savings to RTOs Minimize Real-time M2M payments Improve FTR funding 3

JOA ICP Revisions for DA JOA Interregional Coordination Process (ICP) section 4 describes the steps to perform the DA FFE exchange However, the current language could be enhanced to: Provide flexibility and clarity in executing this protocol Provide consistency between the DA and RT M2M settlement calculations 4

Flexibility and Clarity JOA ICP Revisions for DA Flexibility, Clarity and Consistency ICP Section 4 requires this protocol to be utilized infrequently, since the term infrequently is vague and since the RTOs would like to utilize this protocol in a flexible manner, RTOs plan to remove this provision ICP Section 4.1 requires this protocol to be executed prior to 08:00 EST and 10:00 EST on the day before the operating day, since the RTOs DA market execution timeline could be revised in the future, RTOs would like to introduce flexibility to this provision by removing explicit time requirements Instead of explicit times, RTOs will introduce a requirement for FFE exchange request to occur an hour prior to DA bidding deadline 5

Clarity JOA ICP Revisions for DA Flexibility, Clarity and Consistency RTOs have agreed to cancel the FFE exchange agreement under certain circumstances RTOs will only exchange FFEs if the Flowgate Shadow Price is below a certain threshold defined by the requesting RTO If the RTOs realize that the FFE request cannot be achieved below the requesting RTO s defined threshold, RTOs will cancel the FFE exchange This cancelation would occur within an hour of RTOs DA clearing process RTOs are introducing a new provision to ICP section 4.1 to clarify this agreement 6

JOA ICP Revisions for DA Flexibility, Clarity and Consistency Consistency ICP Section 4.2 defines the DA M2M settlement equation, this equation is utilizing terms that are inconsistent with the terms utilized to define RT M2M equation defined in ICP Section 3.2 In an attempt to introduce consistency between the DA and RT M2M settlement equations, RTOs plan to revise ICP Section 4.2 7

Next Steps PJM intends to file the JOA ICP enhancements with FERC by 8/31/2015 requesting an effective date of 9/30/2015 8

Appendix A JOA Revisions 9

ICP Section 4 Revisions Flexibility and Clarity 4 Day-Ahead Energy Market Coordination The Day-Ahead energy market coordination focuses primarily on ensuring that the Day-Ahead scheduled flows on all M2M Flowgates are limited to no more than the Firm Flow Entitlements for each RTO. When system conditions can accommodate the change, either RTO may request that the Day-Ahead flow limit be raised above its Firm Flow Entitlement. Normally, this protocol will be utilized infrequently and only when the need for additional congestion relief assistance is predictable on a Day-Ahead basis. 10

ICP Section 4.1 Revisions Flexibility 4.1 Day-Ahead Energy Market Coordination Procedures An M2M Flowgate limit exception is a request to alter the M2M Flowgate limits, as described above, that will be modeled in the Day- Ahead markets and/or the Day-Ahead reliability analysis. The following procedure will apply for designating M2M Flowgate limit exceptions: 1. Prior to 0800 EST on the day before the Operating Day, iif the Requesting RTO identifies a need to utilize more of an M2M Flowgate than it is entitled, it may request the Responding RTO to lower its Day-Ahead Market limit below its Firm Flow Entitlement by a specified amount and for a specified range of hours. The Requesting RTO must request the adjustment from the Responding RTO as soon as possible but not later than one hour prior to the Responding RTO s deadline for submitting bids and offers in the day-ahead market. 2. If the Responding RTO agrees to provide the limit reduction, it will communicate the approved amount to the Requesting RTO by 1000 ESTas soon as possible but not later than to the Requesting RTO s deadline for submitting bids and offers in the Day-Ahead Market. 3. The Requesting RTO may increase its limit on the M2M Flowgate by the agreed upon and specified amount and for the specified range of hours. 4. Either Party may rescind the agreement up to one hour after the Responding RTO s deadline for submitting bids and offers in the day-ahead market. 11

ICP Section 4.1 Revisions Consistency 4.2 Day-Ahead Energy Market Settlements The Day-Ahead payment for the RTO that is requesting congestion relief will be calculated as follows: Requesting RTO Payment to Responding RTO = Approved Day-Ahead Adjustment for M2M Flowgate * Responding RTOs M2M Flowgate constraint shadow price. Payment = Approved MW *Transmission Constraint Shadow Price in Responding RTOs Dispatch Solution 12

Appendix B Reference to JCM Benefits Analysis 13

DA FFE Exchange Benefits Example Breed_Wheatland 345 flo Jefferson_Rockport 765 Flowgate for 1/11/2013 $1.2 million RT JOA Settlement between MISO and PJM On average, PJM s Real Time Market Flow is 198 MW more than PJM s FFE On average, MISO s Real Time Market Flow is 152 MW less than MISO s FFE What happens when RTOs exchange FFEs using the DA FFE exchange protocol? 14

DA FFE Exchange Benefits Example 20MW Exchange (MISO -> PJM) 15

DA FFE Exchange Benefits Example 60% of MF-FFE Exchange (MISO -> PJM) 16

Reference to JCM slides for DA FFE Exchange Benefits http://www.miso-pjm.com/~/media/pjm-jointcommon/stakeholdersgroup/20150527/20150527-item-05-day-ahead-market-to-market-coordinationbenefit-analysis.ashx 17