UND COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (CoBPA) AACSB FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS & ENGAGEMENT CRITERIA



Similar documents
Pamplin Definitions for use with AACSB 2013 Faculty Classifications

Standards for Faculty Sufficiency & Faculty Qualifications

School of Management Faculty Qualifications and Engagement Expectations

College of Business and Economics, CSU East Bay

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT

Belk College Policy on Qualified Faculty Status

The Belk College of Business Policy Statement on Academic and Professional Qualifications

1. Attendance at discipline, program, school, faculty or university meetings, including, for example school assessment board.

According to AACSB International Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation Revised January 31, 2008:

AACSB-Qualification and Participation Guidelines AACSB-QUALIFICATION STANDARDS AACSB-QUALIFICATION: INITIAL AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

The Relevant Standards: Academic Qualification (AQ):

APSU College of Business Policy for Faculty Retention, Tenure, Promotion & Annual Review of Tenured Faculty. For Review by Faculty, August 2013

Department of Business STANDARD PROFESSIONAL EXPECTATIONS

CBT CREDENTIALING AND QUALIFICATION EXPECTATIONS 1 College of Business and Technology The University of Texas at Tyler

Faculty Development Plan

Department of Child & Family Development Promotion and Tenure Guidelines November 2004

UNO College of Business Administration (CBA) Requirements regarding Academically Qualified (AQ) and Professionally Qualified (PQ) Faculty

School of Business: University of Southern Maine Intellectual Contributions Expectations and Faculty Qualifications

SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTANCY FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES (approved )

Adopted: May, 2006 (Pub. List revised Nov.2008) PROMOTION AND TENURE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING James Madison University

A spreadsheet approach for monitoring faculty intellectual contributions

DEPARTMENT INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS STATEMENT

A FRAMEWORK FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MERIT ALLOCATION

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration. Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track

Faculty Operating Manual

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty

Deploying Professionally Qualified Faculty: An Interpretation of AACSB Standards An AACSB White Paper issued by:

Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication Clinical Faculty Appointment and Promotion Criteria

Research Scientist Ranks. School of Education. Criteria

Professional Qualification for Faculty (Full-time, Part-time, Adjunct) at Cardinal Strich University

AACSB Business Accreditation Standards 2013 & 2003

College of Education Clinical Faculty Appointment and Promotion Criteria Provost Approved 11/11/11

College of Medicine Promotion and Tenure Procedure FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY

Annual Review of Doctoral Students Guidelines Department of Computer Science College of William & Mary July 2014

DEPARTMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE FACULTY MEMBERSHIP DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY September 2005

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION GUIDELINES

School of Business Administration Deferral Report to

Standards for Promotion and Tenure Required by Section 7.12, Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure. Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts

PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING FACULTY

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CODE OF PRACTICE REGARDING INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TITLES: TITLE DESCRIPTIONS AND MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

Bucknell University. Faculty Scholarly Communications Practices Study. Online Survey Consent Page

BYLAWS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DESIGN COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE AND DANCE THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY

Overview. Regional and Specialized Accreditation: SACSCOC and AACSB SACSCOC 2014 Annual Meeting CS Caveats

APPOINTMENT TO AND PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS PEER REVIEW

Dr. Obaid AlMotairy Dean, College of Business and Economics Qassim University

Policy Manual Date Last Revised: September 17,

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

AACSB Standards. from the Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation Handbook, revised January 31, 2010

Draft Policy on Graduate Education

Department of Applied Arts and Sciences. University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTANCY

GRADUATE FACULTY GUIDELINES

Commendable (C): Rating for faculty whose performance clearly and consistently exceeds requirements in principal professional responsibilities.

1. The UAEU College of Graduate Studies

RANK AND PROMOTIONS GUIDELINES REVISED OCTOBER 2008

IV. Conditions of Academic Appointment

PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM STANDARDS FACULTY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM Revised 05/18/2016

Annual Report. June, 2011

GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University

Annual Report. June, 2008

Department of Management and Human Resources PhD Program

AACSB Accreditation 101: What AACSB Expects, What We Have Done. Faculty Meetings November 2014

AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY POLICY ON PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE DEGREES

AACSB & Faculty Sufficiency in Troubling Economic Times. Michael C. Villano, CPA, CMA. Kent State University

REGULATION 5.1 HIGHER DOCTORATES, THE DOCTORAL DEGREE (RESEARCH), THE DOCTORAL DEGREE (PROFESSIONAL) AND THE MASTERS DEGREE (RESEARCH)

FLSA Compliance: Exempt vs. Non-Exempt Classification Audit **FEDERAL**

SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE

College of Engineering, Forestry & Natural Sciences Conditions of Faculty Service Guidelines for Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure

Doctor of Education Higher Education with Emphasis in Community College Administration Program Handbook

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTANCY ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE

Ph.D. in Art History Academic Assessment Plan

AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING GRADUATE SCHOOL POLICIES

University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition

The Relationship between the Doctoral Plan of Study and the Department s Mission and Program Objectives

BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF PHARMACY THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER July 1, 2013

AACSB INTERNATIONAL SELF EVALUATION REPORT GUIDELINES

GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL LIBRARY/INFORMATION EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

Faculty Workload Policies at Public Universities

AC : ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ACCREDI- TATION: COMPARING AACSB AND ABET

Bylaws of the Governing Faculty College of Public Health University of Nebraska Medical Center

FACULTY INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE NEW AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Saskatchewan Higher Education Quality Assurance Board Quality Assurance Review Process

Small Business Innovation Research ( SBIR ) Programs

Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Accounting Accreditation

G R A D U A T E P R O G R A M S

15 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Policy on Academic Tracks and Promotions for the School of Nursing (SON) at the American University of Beirut (AUB)

College of Education and Health Professions School of Nursing

American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar Standards Review Committee. Definitions Section Explanation of Changes

GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

PROCEDURES AND EVALUATIVE GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION OF TERM FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MARCH 31, 2014

GRADUATE FACULTY COUNCIL DOC. NO. 777 Approved March 22, 1999

Fa culty Evaluation G uidelines for Retention, Tenure, and Promotion to A ssociate Professor

I. Preamble II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite Faculty Assistant Professor...

The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences Faculty Tracks for Academic Rank and Criteria for Promotion

Tenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208

SCHOOL OF MASS COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TENURE AND PROMOTION POLICY MISSION STATEMENT

CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007)

The University of North Carolina at Greensboro College of Arts and Sciences. Academic Professional Faculty Positions

Transcription:

UND COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (CoBPA) AACSB FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS & ENGAGEMENT CRITERIA Approved by CoBPA Dean Margaret Williams on April 7, 2015 The College of Business and Public Administration mission is to discover with purpose. One manifestation of this mission is the creation and dissemination of knowledge. The CoBPA maintains a faculty to achieve this mission. We use AACSB standards, prescribed in the Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation, to assure that we hold standards which are consistent with those held within the wider academic and business community. This document details the criteria used to establish the qualifications of faculty with respect to research and intellectual contribution. I. Faculty Categories AACSB distinguishes between two dimensions of faculty qualifications that speak to the quality and impact of their work. The first is one s initial academic preparation and professional experience. A second dimension refers to the sustaining activities in which faculty are engaged, normally considered during their time as a faculty member at the University of North Dakota. A visual representation of these two dimensions is presented with the AACSB standards and reproduced here as Figure 1 with brief explanations following. Initial academic preparation and professional experience Terminal Degree in area of instruction Figure 1 Sustained engagement activities Academic (research/ scholarship) Significant Scholarly professional Practitioners experience (SP) Scholarly Academics (SA) Applied/ Practice Instructional Practitioners (IP) Practice Academics (PA) Scholarly Academics (SA): Faculty are categorized as SA when they have earned a terminal degree in a field consistent with their teaching responsibilities, indicating expertise. SA faculty demonstrate their currency and relevance to the field through scholarship, research, and other related activities. Practice Academics (PA): Faculty are categorized as PA when they have earned a terminal degree in a field consistent with their teaching responsibilities, indicating expertise. PA faculty demonstrate their currency and relevance to the field in ways that are not typically 1 P a g e

associated with scholarship such as continued engagement and substantial professional experience. Scholarly Practitioners (SP): Faculty are categorized as SP when they have earned their expertise in the field in which they teach through professional experience that is substantial in terms of duration and level of responsibilities. SP faculty demonstrate their currency and relevance to the field through scholarship, research, and other related activities. Instructional Practitioners (IP): Faculty are categorized as IP when they have earned their expertise in the field in which they teach through professional experience that is substantial in terms of duration and level of responsibilities. IP faculty demonstrate their currency and relevance to the field through continued engagement and substantial professional experience. Faculty who do not meet the standards for any of the four categories, as outlined below, will be classified as Other (O) faculty. The table below reports the AACSB minimum percentages for each category. Since the CoBPA has two graduate programs, expectations are higher than the minimum for scholarly academics. Accordingly, the CoBPA will strive to maintain a balance of faculty as shown in the following table. Percentages for Each Faculty Category Faculty Categories AACSB Minimum Percentage CoBPA Percentage SA 40% 50% SA + PA + SP 60% 60% SA + PA + SP + IP 90% 90% II. Scholarly Academics (SA) Faculty members who hold a terminal degree in their primary teaching field shall be considered to have the initial academic preparation for SA status. Faculty members who hold a Juris Doctorate, a specialized graduate degree in Taxation, or a combination of graduate degrees in law and accounting will be considered SA to teach business law and taxation courses, respectively. Faculty members with a terminal degree in the discipline they teach, JD, or other specialized graduate degree will be considered SA for five years from the date the degree is awarded. Faculty members who are doctoral students in ABD status will be considered to have met the SA initial academic preparation criteria for no more than two years beyond the date of the defense of their dissertation proposal. 2 P a g e

Faculty members who hold a terminal degree that is unrelated to their primary teaching field and have substantial practitioner experience in the discipline they teach may be initially considered SP for five years from the date the degree is awarded. In rare circumstances (e.g. moving from a clinical non-tenure track position to a tenure-track position) an individual may move from SP to SA status based on evidence of Sustained Engagement Activities. B. Sustained Engagement Activities: Faculty members may undertake a variety of scholarly activities to support maintenance of SA status. All faculty members who are classified as SA must make intellectual contributions to their disciplines. Faculty can maintain the SA classification by one of the options below. Option A Option B Option C Number of Distinct Engagement Activities During Five Year Period A total of five (5) activities including a minimum of two (2) peerreviewed journal articles (in-print, in-press with editorial confirmation) on the CoBPA Faculty Quality Journal List (which indicates a minimum quality level of 2). A total of four (4) activities including a minimum of one (1) peerreviewed journal article (in-print, in-press with editorial confirmation) rated at least a three (3) on the CoBPA Faculty Quality Journal List. A total of three (3) activities including a minimum of one (1) peerreviewed journal article (in-print, in-press with editorial confirmation) rated at least a four (4) on the CoBPA Faculty Quality Journal List. A non-exhaustive list of other types of intellectual contributions: (A faculty member is encouraged to work with his or her department chair to determine a priori if a specific activity is likely to qualify as one of the following for the purposes of determining faculty qualification.) Publication in a peer-reviewed journal article listed on the CoBPA Journal Quality List Publication in a peer-reviewed journal article not on the CoBPA Journal Quality List Conference presentation of a research paper Publication of a conference proceedings paper Publication or revision of a textbook Publication of an article in a non-peer-reviewed journal, periodical, or trade journal Service as an editor, associate editor, or editorial board member of a journal that is present on the CoBPA faculty quality journal list 3 P a g e

Service as a book reviewer for a peer-reviewed journal Service as an officer for an academic association Administrative Reduction: Individuals with significant administrative duties according to Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) will be given pro-rated reductions of evidence required for faculty qualification based on percentage of time devoted to administration. III. Practice Academics (PA) Normally the initial academic preparation for a faculty member classified as PA is the same as those outlined for SA. B. Sustained Engagement Activities: Faculty members may undertake a variety of professional engagement activities to interact with business and management practice to support maintenance of PA status. Faculty members maintain PA classification by producing a minimum of two (2) activities from the list below in a five year time frame. The activities a faculty member participates in must be directly related to the discipline in which she/he teaches. A non-exhaustive list of professional engagement activities includes the following: (A faculty member is encouraged to work with his or her department chair to determine a priori if a specific activity is likely to qualify as one of the following for the purposes of determining faculty qualification.) Consulting activities related to industry or government that demonstrate significant impact Consulting or research that impacts economic development Serving as a board member or officer of a for-profit or non-profit organization Documented continuing professional education to maintain or augment the ability to practice their profession (e.g. CPA, CFA, bar affiliation, SHRM, or other appropriate certifications/degrees) Participating in a faculty internship Participation in significant activities that place faculty in direct continual contact with business or other organizational leaders Practice-oriented intellectual contributions Serving as an officer for a business or academic professional association Sustained professional work in industry, government, or the not-for-profit sector Serving as a facilitator of executive education for practicing professionals in the discipline area in which the faculty member teaches. 4 P a g e

IV. Scholarly Practitioners (SP) A scholarly practitioner must have a master s degree in a discipline related to the field of teaching. In rare cases, SP status may be used for an individual without a master s degree if the depth, duration, sophistication, and complexity of their professional experience at the time of hiring outweighs their lack of graduate degree qualifications. In addition to the master s degree an individual who is classified as SP must demonstrate significant professional accomplishments relevant to their primary area of teaching. Such accomplishments are traditionally earned through full-time employment that has a high degree of responsibility and is significant in the duration of time. B. Sustained Engagement Activities: Faculty members maintain SP classification by producing a minimum of two (2) activities from the list below in a five year window. (A faculty member is encouraged to work with his or her department chair to determine a priori if a specific activity is likely to qualify as one of the following for the purposes of determining faculty qualification.) Peer-reviewed or invited conference presentation Publication of a peer-reviewed journal article Publication of a conference proceedings paper Publication or revision of a textbook Publication of an article in a non-peer-reviewed journal, periodical, or trade journal Service as an editor, associate editor, or editorial board member of a journal that is present on the CoBPA faculty quality journal list Service as a book reviewer for a peer-reviewed journal Service as an officer for an academic association V. Instructional Practitioners (IP) Normally the initial academic preparation for a faculty member classified as IP is the same as those outlined for SP. B. Sustained Engagement Activities: Faculty members may undertake a variety of professional engagement activities to interact with business and management practice to support maintenance of IP status. Faculty members maintain IP classification by producing a minimum of two (2) activities from the list below in a five year period of time. The activities a faculty member participates in must be directly related to the discipline which she/he teaches. A non-exhaustive list of professional engagement activities includes the following: (A faculty member is encouraged to work with his or her department chair to 5 P a g e

determine a priori if a specific activity is likely to qualify as one of the following for the purposes of determining faculty qualification.) Consulting activities related to industry or government that demonstrate significant impact Consulting or research that impacts economic development Serving as a board member or officer of a for-profit or non-profit organization Documented continuing professional education to maintain or augment the ability to practice their profession (e.g. CPA, CFA, bar affiliation, SHRM, or other appropriate certifications/degrees) Participating in a faculty internships Participation in significant activities that place faculty in direct continual contact with business or other organizational leaders Practice-oriented intellectual contributions Serving as an officer in a business or professional association Sustained professional work in industry, government, or the not-for-profit sector Serving as a facilitator of executive education for practicing professionals in the discipline area in which the faculty member teaches. Process for Implementation: All engagement activities must be documented in Digital Measures so that they can be readily accessible to administrators. Each March, the department chair will review the status of each faculty member and propose a classification. The results will be reported to the faculty member and the dean s office by April 1. All faculty qualification decisions are subject to the dean s final approval. Note: Please review alternative documents for merit and promotion/tenure processes. 6 P a g e