Fa culty Evaluation G uidelines for Retention, Tenure, and Promotion to A ssociate Professor
|
|
|
- Branden Ray
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fa culty Evaluation G uidelines for Retention, Tenure, and Promotion to A ssociate Professor The following guidelines apply to tenure-track faculty and incorporate changes to the Handbook for Professional Personnel, passed by the Board of Trustees in July of Fa c ulty m ust m eet a ll Handbook for Professional Personnel obligations, contractual standards as outlined in the appendix of this document, have a record of conduct c o nsistent with professional s tandards, and show sustained growth in all three evaluation areas to be considered for tenure and promotion to Associate Professor. The School of Professional Studies is committed to a holistic view of the tenure candidate in terms of evaluating his/her performance as part of the big picture of the work and accomplishments in all three areas over the six year review period. In order to achieve tenure and promotion to associate professor, a candidate must show evidence of effective teaching as well as demonstrate proficiency in the two other evaluation areas based on the guidelines. FA C ULTY MUST MEET ALL O F THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA FOR EACH EVALUATION AREA TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR TENURE AND PROMOTION TO ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR. DEPARTMENT MISSON STATEMENT: The Department of Technical Communication and Media Production supports the mission of the University by providing a high quality, accessible, enriching education that prepares students for successful careers in a multicultural, global and technological society. As a component of the School of Professional Studies, the Department shares the mission of the School in serving the community as a living laboratory. The Department of Technical Communication and Media Production prepares its graduates to enter the profession by offering courses in formal and virtual classrooms that meet various industry needs. The Department imparts knowledge through curriculum in two programs: Journalism and Technical Communication. Journalism concentration areas include: News & Editorial, Photojournalism, Magazines, and Public Relations. Technical Communication concentration areas include: Technical Writing and Editing, Corporate Communication and Training, Video Production and Interactive Media. Department faculty demonstrate pedagogic leadership by bringing evidence to the classroom of continuing work in the profession, as well as by providing heuristic activities through academic endeavors. 1
2 I. Teaching: The School of Professional Studies values quality teaching with a focus on student learning that supports development of the knowledge and skills necessary to be an effective professional in the field. Earning tenure requires faculty to continue professional growth and development. In the teaching area, this may include participating in activities such as faculty learning communities, peer observation cohorts, and/or workshops and conferences focused on teaching. Faculty members are encouraged to employ innovative and creative teaching methods and technology that stimulate learning through a multifaceted teaching and learning environment. Given the diverse nature of our student body, teaching and advising that supports student success and increases cultural awareness is highly valued. Teaching is the act of creating and maintaining an environment which enhances the opportunities for student learning and discipline-related growth; it includes advising students to facilitate graduation and to transition to post-baccalaureate careers or further educational opportunities. Teaching is a complex and reflective human activity that, in the higher education context, is offered in a forum that is advanced, semi-public, and essentially critical in nature. No single definition can possibly suffice to cover the range of talents that go into excellent teaching or that could be found across the board in the varied departments and disciplines of an entire university. Good teachers are scholars, researchers, inventors, scientists, creators, artists, professionals, investigators, practitioners or those with advanced expertise or experience who share knowledge, using appropriate methodologies, and who demonstrate and encourage enthusiasm about the subject matter in such a way as to leave the student with a lasting and vivid conviction of having benefited from that interaction. Effective teachers typically maintain high academic standards, prepare students for professional work and development, facilitate student achievement, and provide audiences for student work. Some might add that the best teaching transmits specific skills or enhances talents that students possess, while others would note that good teaching develops habits of mind or provides models of scholarly, scientific, artistic or professional behavior and inquiry much more important than particular information. Faculty typically aspire to a number of other civic purposes in the classroom that may also include encouraging their students to long for the truth, to aspire to achievement, to emulate heroes, to become just, or to do good, for example. At the instructional level, the most important responsibilities of a teacher to his/her students are the following: 1) C ontent Expertise: To demonstrate knowledge and/or relevant experience. Effective teachers display knowledge of their subject matters in the relevant learning environment (classroom, on-line, hybrid, field work, etc.), which typically includes the skills, competencies, and knowledge in a specific subject area in which the faculty member has received advanced experience, training, or education. 2
3 2) I nstructional Design: To re-order and re-organize this knowledge/experience for student learning. Effective teachers design course objectives, syllabi, materials, activities, and experiences that are conducive to learning. 3) I nstructional Delivery: To communicate and translate this knowledge/experience into a format accessible to students: Effective teachers communicate information clearly, create environments conducive to learning, and use an appropriate variety of teaching methods. 4) Instructional Assessment: To evaluate the mastery and other accomplishments of students. Effective teachers design assessment procedures appropriate to course objectives, ensure fairness in student evaluation and grading, and provide constructive feedback on student work. 5) A dv ising In and B eyond the Classroom: To provide guidance for students as they pursue undergraduate and post-baccalaureate education and/or employment. Effective advisors interact with students to provide career guidance and information, degree program guidance and information (e.g., advice on an appropriate schedule to facilitate graduation), and answers to questions relating to a discipline. FA CULTY S HALL D EMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING B Y MEETING THE FOLLOWING TEACHING CRITERIA: 1. C ontent Expertise: Updating courses taught and staying current in information presented in classes. 2. I nstructional Design: Involved in curriculum development and maintenance. 3. I nstructional Delivery: Demonstrates appropriate and effective use of class delivery to achieve course objectives. SRI s are conducted and are in line with the department norm. At least one summative peer review must be included in the tenure portfolio. Additional formative peer evaluations may be required by the department. 3
4 4. Instructional Assessment: 5. A dv ising Actively participates in effective evaluation of individual students, individual courses, and program, including yearly assessment reports, program review, and, if a program is accredited, accreditation. Meets Handbook requirements and departmental norms for posting of hours, keeping schedule, use of alternative means of advising, meeting with students at other times as needed, and other requirements for advising Uses BANNER for advising contacts. II. S cholarly A ctivities: The School of Professional Studies values faculty scholarship and expects faculty to engage in ongoing professional development to remain current in their areas of expertise through activities such as participating in trainings, workshops, conferences, and/or certification processes. In addition, faculty must participate in the scholarly discussions by sharing their knowledge via presentations, publications, and other appropriate forms of scholarship in forums in which scholarly activities are peer reviewed. We encourage faculty to engage in collaborative forms of scholarship and we support a broad definition of scholarship which includes the scholarship of teaching and learning and the scholarship of application as defined in the Boyer model for scholarship. Scholarly and creative activities are disciplinary or interdisciplinary expressions or interpretations that develop ideas, frame questions, create new forms of representation, solve problems, or explore enduring puzzles. Purposes include, but are not limited to, the following: advancing knowledge or culture through original research or creative activities; interpreting knowledge within or across disciplines; synthesizing information across disciplines, across topics, or across time; aiding society or disciplines in addressing problems; or enhancing knowledge of student learning and effective teaching. Typically, to be considered scholarship, findings should be disseminated to either peer review by disciplinary scholars or professional or governmental organizations; or critical reflection by a wider community, including corporations or non-profit organizations, for example. In addition to these scholarly activities, and depending on the specific Department Guidelines, this category may also include activities in which the faculty member shares other knowledge with members of the learned and professional communities; continued 4
5 education and professional development activities appropriate to professional status or assignments; and other activities specific to the faculty member s discipline or assigned responsibilities. FACULTY SHALL DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES BY MEETING THE FOLLOWING SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY CRITERIA: 1. The faculty member must complete peer reviewed or juried exhibitions or professionally a djudicated a ctivities a s listed below specific to discipline: A minimum of one publication of a paper in a peer reviewed journal or exhibition of creative work(s) in a juried show or presentation of creative works in an adjudicated or auditioned performance. Scholarly work will be evaluated on its merits with no distinction made between single or multiple authorship. Scholarly works accepted, not simply s ubmitted, for publication, exhibition, or performance at the time of portfolio submission meet this standard. Examples of creative work may include media productions such as websites, video programs, Web 2.0 media, 2D or 3D animation, graphic art projects and other linear or interactive media programs/projects. Examples of juried or adjudicated venues include professional organization competitions such as Educause, SPJ, PRSA, NPPA, BEA, STC, ISTE, AACE, MCA-I, NATPE, ASTD, New Media C onsortium, etc.; competitive national film/video/interactive media festivals such as CINDY, Telly or Accolades; local or regional competitive media festivals such as NATAS, Moondance Film Festival, Estes Park Film Festival; and international festivals or competitions. OR Publication of a scholarly book, textbook, booklet, or book chapter by a nationally recognized publisher. Scholarly writing will be evaluated on its merits with no distinction made between single or multiple authorship. OR Receipt of a sizable competitive grant from a recognized external entity that helps the faculty member produce a product (e.g., paper, media production, etc.). No distinction will be made between participation as principle or coprinciple investigator on the grant or those who make a significant contribution to the grant work. 5
6 AND A minimum of three peer-reviewed or invited presentations of the faculty member s original work in a department approved professional meeting/conference. Exceptions: if the faculty member has published or has in publication a scholarly book or textbook, no peer reviewed or invited presentations are required. Publication of a paper in a peer reviewed journal or exhibition of creative work(s) in a juried show or presentation of creative works in an adjudicated or auditioned performance may be substituted in a one-to-one ratio for presentations. AND Advanced study to stay current in the field or learn new information/skills. Examples include attendance at professional conferences, workshops, seminars and meetings that are relevant to the discipline. In addition, training sessions dealing with software proficiency, learning the operation of equipment or other general training relevant to the performance of one s duties will be acceptable. Gaining distinction through fellowships awarded to the faculty member is also recognized as advanced study. Te nure-track faculty are expected to satisfy seven of the following criteria over the six-year te nure-track period: Be an ongoing self funded member of at least one discipline relevant local, regional, national, or international organization. Be actively involved in a relevant professional organization by attending at least 2 local events or one regional or national event per year. Share professional expertise with colleagues through presentations in other departments, to campus groups, or at conferences. Consulting work and participating in design shows also are appropriate activities for meeting this standard. Read professional books and other publications, such as trade journals and/or professional journals related to the discipline, with evidence of incorporating current information into course material. Provide evidence of currency in the field through engagement in industryrelated activities and organizational meetings. Attend at least one discipline relevant local workshop, lecture, or seminar, including online seminars per year. Write or obtain a grant proposal or funds to support classroom instruction or activities related to the discipline and department activities. Undertake work activity (writing, research, project production, etc.) as part of a professional grant. 6
7 Serve on a review committee or in an editorial capacity for a journal or trade publication. Serve as a judge for a media competition at least twice in different review period years. Successfully complete two College courses related to the discipline with B or better grade. Exhibits professionally in a gallery or at a website in different review period years. Serve on an accrediting visitation team performing at least one review visit. AND Other departmentally defined activities. III. S ervice: Examples include self-training through tutorials; attendance at and participation in workshops through the Center for Faculty Development and other university-sanctioned workshops or seminars. The School of Professional Studies is committed to service that supports students; that creates a climate that is respectful and supportive of diversity; and that supports the mission of the Department, the School of Professional Studies, and the University. Faculty are expected to engage in service on an ongoing basis throughout their career at Metro though the type and nature of the service may vary. We define community service as unpaid work done at the local, state, national and/or international level which utilizes the faculty member's skills and expertise to create positive community change and/or that supports our students to achieve their educational and career goals. Faculty engage in service when they participate in the shared governance and good functioning of the institution; service to the institution can be at the program, department, school, or university level. Beyond the institution, faculty engage in service when they use their disciplinary and/or professional expertise and talents to contribute to the betterment of their multiple environments, such as regional communities, professional and disciplinary associations, non-profit organizations, or government agencies. FA CULTY S HALL D EMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN S ERVICE B Y MEETING THE FOLLOWING SERVICE CRITERIA: D e monstration of significant a ccomplishment a nd contribution in some combination of or inte nse focus in the following service a ctivities: Within the institution at the university, school, department or program level. 7
8 Outside the institution in the community or profession. Service includes committees, projects, advisory boards, playing a leadership role, program coordination, review of articles, and accreditation. All should be related to the goals of the University, School, Department, Profession or provide related expertise to the community. Te nure-track faculty are expected to satisfy the following requirements over a six-year period in order to meet minimum standards in the area of service: Attend and participate in all department meetings and assessment activities unless excused by the chair. Serve on departmental committees as assigned and accomplish desired tasks as outlined by the committee. Participate in at least six department recruiting activities such as a Majors Fair, MSU Denver Open House or other recruitment activity. Serve on at least one school or university committee or chair at least one department committee that requires at least a 15-hour time commitment per academic year. Provide service, using professional expertise or skills to at least one community or professional organization per academic year. In addition, te nure-track faculty are expected to satisfy five of the following criteria over the six-year tenure-track period: Review material for department, school, or university committees and document time commitment. Undertake a special assignment for program review. Obtain donations in the form of equipment, supplies, or monies for the program at least three times during the review period. Assist in supervising or supervise a department lab for at least 20 hours per academic year. Participate in a standing school, faculty senate, or university committee(s) that requires at least 20 hours per academic year. Actively serve in the Faculty Senate, attending the majority of scheduled meetings and reporting senate activities and concerns to the department. Serve as a Commencement Marshall for at least four ceremonies. Actively serve on a Faculty Senate C ommittee, attending the majority of scheduled meetings. Develop print, web or video materials of professional quality for department marketing activities. Chair or serve on a department, school or university search committee at least twice during the review period. Organize a professional conference or event. Serve on a committee or board of a professional organization. 8
9 Provide service to a professional organization or community service board of directors that requires at least a 10-hour time commitment per academic year while using discipline specific skills or professional expertise. Accrue 20 hours of service provided to a community or professional organization in which faculty members use or share their professional expertise to benefit the organization. Serve as a judge for a competitive event hosted by or sponsored by a professional or community organization at least twice during the review period. Undertake other activities in consultation with the chair. Develop community and industry partnerships that result in collaborative projects or other student/department benefits. 9
10 Fa culty Evaluation G uidelines for Promotion to Full Professor The following guidelines apply to tenured faculty and incorporate changes to the Handbook for Professional Personnel, passed by the Board of Trustees in July of Fa c ulty m ust m eet a ll Handbook for Professional Personnel obligations, contractual standards as outlined in the appendix of this document, have a record of conduct consistent with professional standards, and show sustained growth in all three evaluation areas to be considered for promotion to Full Professor. The School of Professional Studies is committed to a holistic view of the promotion candidate in terms of evaluating his/her performance as part of the big picture of the work and accomplishments in all three areas. In order to achieve promotion to fullprofessor, a candidate must show evidence of excellence in teaching as well as in the two other evaluation areas based on the guidelines since the faculty member s last major review. FA C ULTY MUST MEET ALL O F THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA FOR EACH EVALUATION AREA TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR PROMOTION TO FULL PROFESSOR. A ctivities must be completed after receiving tenure and promotion to associate professor. I. Teaching: The School of Professional Studies values quality teaching with a focus on student learning that supports development of the knowledge and skills necessary to be an effective professional in the field. Promotion to Full Professor requires faculty to continue professional growth and development. In the teaching area, this may include participating in activities such as faculty learning communities, peer observation cohorts, and/or workshops and conferences focused on teaching. Faculty members are encouraged to employ innovative and creative teaching methods and technology that stimulate learning through a multifaceted teaching and learning environment. Given the diverse nature of our student body, teaching and advising that supports student success and increases cultural awareness is highly valued. Teaching is the act of creating and maintaining an environment which enhances the opportunities for student learning and discipline-related growth; it includes advising students to facilitate graduation and to transition to post-baccalaureate careers or further educational opportunities. Teaching is a complex and reflective human activity that, in the higher education context, is offered in a forum that is advanced, semi-public, and essentially critical in nature. No single definition can possibly suffice to cover the 10
11 range of talents that go into excellent teaching or that could be found across the board in the varied departments and disciplines of an entire university. Good teachers are scholars, researchers, inventors, scientists, creators, artists, professionals, investigators, practitioners or those with advanced expertise or experience who share knowledge, using appropriate methodologies, and who demonstrate and encourage enthusiasm about the subject matter in such a way as to leave the student with a lasting and vivid conviction of having benefited from that interaction. Effective teachers typically maintain high academic standards, prepare students for professional work and development, facilitate student achievement, and provide audiences for student work. Some might add that the best teaching transmits specific skills or enhances talents that students possess, while others would note that good teaching develops habits of mind or provides models of scholarly, scientific, artistic or professional behavior and inquiry much more important than particular information. Faculty typically aspire to a number of other civic purposes in the classroom that may also include encouraging their students to long for the truth, to aspire to achievement, to emulate heroes, to become just, or to do good, for example. At the instructional level, the most important responsibilities of a teacher to his/her students are the following: 1) C ontent Expertise: To demonstrate knowledge and/or relevant experience. Effective teachers display knowledge of their subject matters in the relevant learning environment (classroom, on-line, hybrid, field work, etc.), which typically includes the skills, competencies, and knowledge in a specific subject area in which the faculty member has received advanced experience, training, or education. 2) I nstructional Design: To re-order and re-organize this knowledge/experience for student learning. Effective teachers design course objectives, syllabi, materials, activities, and experiences that are conducive to learning. 3) I nstructional Delivery: To communicate and translate this knowledge/experience into a format accessible to students: Effective teachers communicate information clearly, create environments conducive to learning, and use an appropriate variety of teaching methods. 4) Instructional Assessment: To evaluate the mastery and other accomplishments of students. Effective teachers design assessment procedures appropriate to course objectives, ensure fairness in student evaluation and grading, and provide constructive feedback on student work. 5) A dv ising In and B eyond the Classroom: To provide guidance for students as they pursue undergraduate and post-baccalaureate education and/or employment. Effective advisors interact with students to provide career guidance and information, degree program guidance and information (e.g., advice on an appropriate schedule to facilitate graduation), and answers to questions relating to a discipline. 11
12 FA CULTY S HALL D EMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING B Y MEETING THE FOLLOWING TEACHING CRITERIA: 1. C ontent Expertise: Updating courses taught and staying current in information presented in classes. 2. I nstructional Design: Involved in curriculum development and maintenance. 3. I nstructional Delivery: Demonstrates appropriate and effective use of class delivery to achieve course objectives. SRI s are conducted and are in line with the department norm. At least one summative peer review must be included in the promotion portfolio. Additional formative peer evaluations may be required by the department. 4. Instructional Assessment: 5. A dv ising Actively participates in effective evaluation of individual students, individual courses, and program, including yearly assessment reports, program review, and, if a program is accredited, accreditation. Meets Handbook requirements and departmental norms for posting of hours, keeping schedule, use of alternative means of advising, meeting with students at other times as needed, and other requirements for advising Uses BANNER for advising contacts. II. S cholarly A ctivities: The School of Professional Studies values faculty scholarship and expects faculty to engage in ongoing professional development to remain current in their areas of expertise through activities such as participating in trainings, workshops, conferences, and/or certification processes. In addition, faculty must participate in the scholarly discussions by sharing their knowledge via presentations, publications, and other appropriate forms 12
13 of scholarship in forums in which scholarly activities are peer reviewed. We encourage faculty to engage in collaborative forms of scholarship and we support a broad definition of scholarship which includes the scholarship of teaching and learning and the scholarship of application as defined in the Boyer model for scholarship. Scholarly and creative activities are disciplinary or interdisciplinary expressions or interpretations that develop ideas, frame questions, create new forms of representation, solve problems, or explore enduring puzzles. Purposes include, but are not limited to, the following: advancing knowledge or culture through original research or creative activities; interpreting knowledge within or across disciplines; synthesizing information across disciplines, across topics, or across time; aiding society or disciplines in addressing problems; or enhancing knowledge of student learning and effective teaching. Typically, to be considered scholarship, findings should be disseminated to either peer review by disciplinary scholars or professional or governmental organizations; or critical reflection by a wider community, including corporations or non-profit organizations, for example. In addition to these scholarly activities, and depending on the specific Department Guidelines, this category may also include activities in which the faculty member shares other knowledge with members of the learned and professional communities; continued education and professional development activities appropriate to professional status or assignments; and other activities specific to the faculty member s discipline or assigned responsibilities. FACULTY SHALL DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES B Y MEETING THE FOLLOWING SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY CRITERIA: The faculty member must complete peer reviewed or juried exhibitions or professionally a djudicated a ctivities a s listed below specific to discipline: A minimum of five peer reviewed works, one of which must be a publication of a paper in a peer reviewed journal or exhibition of creative work(s) in a juried show or presentation of creative works in an adjudicated or auditioned performance, in some combination of the following: o Publication of paper(s) in a peer reviewed journal or exhibition of creative work(s) in a juried show or presentation of creative works in an adjudicated or auditioned performance. Scholarly works will be evaluated on its merits with no distinction made between single or 13
14 multiple authorship. Scholarly works accepted for publication, exhibition, or performance at the time of portfolio submission meet this standard. OR o Publication of a scholarly book, textbook, booklet, or book chapter by a nationally recognized publisher. Scholarly writing will be evaluated on its merits with no distinction made between single or multiple authorship. OR o Receipt of sizable competitive grant(s) from a recognized external entity that helps the faculty member produce a product (e.g., paper, media production, etc.). No distinction will be made between participation as principle or co-principle investigator on the grant or those who make a significant contribution to the grant work. OR o Peer-reviewed or invited presentation(s) of the faculty member s original work in a department approved professional meeting/conference. If the faculty member has published or has in publication a scholarly book or textbook, no peer reviewed or invited presentations are required. Publication of a paper in a peer reviewed journal or exhibition of creative work(s) in a juried show or presentation of creative works in an adjudicated or auditioned performance may be substituted in a one-toone ratio for presentations. AND Advanced study/conference attendance/ work towards completion of an advanced degree to stay current in the field or learn new information/skills. AND Other departmentally defined activities. III. S ervice: The School of Professional Studies is committed to service that supports students; that creates a climate that is respectful and supportive of diversity; and that supports the mission of the Department, the School of Professional Studies, and the University. Faculty are expected to engage in service on an ongoing basis throughout their career at 14
15 Metro though the type and nature of the service may vary. We define community service as unpaid work done at the local, state, national and/or international level which utilizes the faculty member's skills and expertise to create positive community change and/or that supports our students to achieve their educational and career goals. Faculty engage in service when they participate in the shared governance and good functioning of the institution; service to the institution can be at the program, department, school, or university level. Beyond the institution, faculty engage in service when they use their disciplinary and/or professional expertise and talents to contribute to the betterment of their multiple environments, such as regional communities, professional and disciplinary associations, non-profit organizations, or government agencies. FA CULTY S HALL D EMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN S ERVICE B Y MEETING THE FOLLOWING SERVICE CRITERIA: Demonstration of significant a ccomplishment a nd contribution in some combination of or intense focus in the following service a ctivities: Within the institution at the university, school, department or program level. Outside the institution in the community or profession. Examples of service include committees, projects, advisory boards, playing a leadership role, program coordination, review of articles, and accreditation. All should be related to the goals of the University, School, Department, Profession or provide related expertise to the community. 15
16 Fa culty Evaluation G uidelines for Post-Tenure Review The following guidelines apply to tenured faculty and incorporate changes to the Handbook for Professional Personnel, passed by the Board of Trustees in July of Fa c ulty m ust m eet a ll Handbook for Professional Personnel obligations, contractual standards as outlined in the appendix of this document, have a record of conduct c o nsistent with professional s tandards, and show sustained growth in all three evaluation areas for a successful Post-Tenure Review. The School of Professional Studies is committed to a holistic view of the post-tenure review faculty member in terms of evaluating his/her performance as part of the big picture of the work and accomplishments in all three areas over the five year review period. In order to achieve a successful post-tenure review, a faculty member must show evidence of effective teaching as well as involvement in the two other evaluation areas based on the guidelines. FA C ULTY MUST MEET ALL O F THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA FOR EACH EVALUATION AREA TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR A POSITIVE POST-TENURE REVIEW. I. Teaching: The School of Professional Studies values quality teaching with a focus on student learning that supports development of the knowledge and skills necessary to be an effective professional in the field. Successful post-tenure review requires faculty to continue professional growth and development. In the teaching area, this may include participating in activities such as faculty learning communities, peer observation cohorts, and/or workshops and conferences focused on teaching. Faculty members are encouraged to employ innovative and creative teaching methods and technology that stimulate learning through a multifaceted teaching and learning environment. Given the diverse nature of our student body, teaching and advising that supports student success and increases cultural awareness is highly valued. Teaching is the act of creating and maintaining an environment which enhances the opportunities for student learning and discipline-related growth; it includes advising students to facilitate graduation and to transition to post-baccalaureate careers or further educational opportunities. Teaching is a complex and reflective human activity that, in the higher education context, is offered in a forum that is advanced, semi-public, and essentially critical in nature. No single definition can possibly suffice to cover the range of talents that go into excellent teaching or that could be found across the board in the varied departments and disciplines of an entire university. Good teachers are scholars, researchers, inventors, scientists, creators, artists, professionals, investigators, 16
17 practitioners or those with advanced expertise or experience who share knowledge, using appropriate methodologies, and who demonstrate and encourage enthusiasm about the subject matter in such a way as to leave the student with a lasting and vivid conviction of having benefited from that interaction. Effective teachers typically maintain high academic standards, prepare students for professional work and development, facilitate student achievement, and provide audiences for student work. Some might add that the best teaching transmits specific skills or enhances talents that students possess, while others would note that good teaching develops habits of mind or provides models of scholarly, scientific, artistic or professional behavior and inquiry much more important than particular information. Faculty typically aspire to a number of other civic purposes in the classroom that may also include encouraging their students to long for the truth, to aspire to achievement, to emulate heroes, to become just, or to do good, for example. At the instructional level, the most important responsibilities of a teacher to his/her students are the following: 1) C ontent Expertise: To demonstrate knowledge and/or relevant experience. Effective teachers display knowledge of their subject matters in the relevant learning environment (classroom, on-line, hybrid, field work, etc.), which typically includes the skills, competencies, and knowledge in a specific subject area in which the faculty member has received advanced experience, training, or education. 2) I nstructional Design: To re-order and re-organize this knowledge/experience for student learning. Effective teachers design course objectives, syllabi, materials, activities, and experiences that are conducive to learning. 3) I nstructional Delivery: To communicate and translate this knowledge/experience into a format accessible to students: Effective teachers communicate information clearly, create environments conducive to learning, and use an appropriate variety of teaching methods. 4) Instructional Assessment: To evaluate the mastery and other accomplishments of students. Effective teachers design assessment procedures appropriate to course objectives, ensure fairness in student evaluation and grading, and provide constructive feedback on student work. 5) A dv ising In and B eyond the Classroom: To provide guidance for students as they pursue undergraduate and post-baccalaureate education and/or employment. Effective advisors interact with students to provide career guidance and information, degree program guidance and information (e.g., advice on an appropriate schedule to facilitate graduation), and answers to questions relating to a discipline. 17
18 FACULTY SHALL DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING BY MEETING THE FOLLOWING TEACHING CRITERIA: 1. C ontent Expertise: Updating courses taught and staying current in information presented in classes. 2. I nstructional Design: Involved in curriculum development and maintenance. 3. I nstructional Delivery: Demonstrates appropriate and effective use of class delivery to achieve course objectives. SRI s are conducted and are in line with the department norm. 4. Instructional Assessment: Actively participates in effective evaluation of individual students, individual courses, and program, including yearly assessment reports, program review, and, if a program is accredited, accreditation. 5. A dv ising Meets Handbook requirements and departmental norms for posting of hours, keeping schedule, use of alternative means of advising, meeting with students at other times as needed, and other requirements for advising Uses BANNER for advising contacts. II. S cholarly A ctivities: The School of Professional Studies values faculty scholarship and expects faculty to engage in ongoing professional development to remain current in their areas of expertise through activities such as participating in trainings, workshops, conferences, and/or certification processes. In addition, faculty must participate in the scholarly discussions by sharing their knowledge via presentations, publications, and other appropriate forms of scholarship in forums in which scholarly activities are peer reviewed. We encourage faculty to engage in collaborative forms of scholarship and we support a broad definition of scholarship which includes the scholarship of teaching and learning and the scholarship of application as defined in the Boyer model for scholarship. 18
19 Scholarly and creative activities are disciplinary or interdisciplinary expressions or interpretations that develop ideas, frame questions, create new forms of representation, solve problems, or explore enduring puzzles. Purposes include, but are not limited to, the following: advancing knowledge or culture through original research or creative activities; interpreting knowledge within or across disciplines; synthesizing information across disciplines, across topics, or across time; aiding society or disciplines in addressing problems; or enhancing knowledge of student learning and effective teaching. Typically, to be considered scholarship, findings should be disseminated to either peer review by disciplinary scholars or professional or governmental organizations; or critical reflection by a wider community, including corporations or non-profit organizations, for example. In addition to these scholarly activities, and depending on the specific Department Guidelines, this category may also include activities in which the faculty member shares other knowledge with members of the learned and professional communities; continued education and professional development activities appropriate to professional status or assignments; and other activities specific to the faculty member s discipline or assigned responsibilities. FACULTY SHALL DEMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES BY MEETING THE FOLLOWING SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY CRITERIA: The faculty member must complete peer reviewed or juried exhibitions or professionally a djudicated a ctivities a s listed below specific to discipline: A minimum of two peer reviewed works in the post-tenure review period in some combination of: o Publications of a paper in a peer reviewed journal or exhibition of creative work(s) in a juried show or presentation of creative works in an adjudicated or auditioned performance; OR o Publication of a scholarly book, textbook, booklet, or book chapter by a nationally recognized publisher. Scholarly writing will be evaluated on its merits with no distinction made between single or multiple authorship. OR 19
20 o Receipt of a sizable competitive grant from a recognized external entity that helps the faculty member produce a product (e.g., paper, media production, etc.); OR o Peer-reviewed or invited presentations of the faculty member s original work in a department approved professional meeting/conference. If the faculty member has published or has in publication a scholarly book or textbook, no other peer reviewed or invited activities are required. Scholarly works will be evaluated on their merits with no distinction made between single or multiple authorship. Scholarly works accepted for publication, exhibition, or performance at the time of portfolio submission meet this standard. AND Advanced study/conference attendance to stay current in the field or learn new information/skills. AND Other departmentally defined activities as applicable. III. S ervice: The School of Professional Studies is committed to service that supports students; that creates a climate that is respectful and supportive of diversity; and that supports the mission of the Department, the School of Professional Studies, and the University. Faculty are expected to engage in service on an ongoing basis throughout their career at Metro though the type and nature of the service may vary. We define community service as unpaid work done at the local, state, national and/or international level which utilizes the faculty member's skills and expertise to create positive community change and/or that supports our students to achieve their educational and career goals. Faculty engage in service when they participate in the shared governance and good functioning of the institution; service to the institution can be at the program, department, school, or university level. Beyond the institution, faculty engage in service when they use their disciplinary and/or professional expertise and talents to contribute to the betterment of their multiple environments, such as regional communities, professional and disciplinary associations, non-profit organizations, or government agencies. 20
21 FA CULTY S HALL D EMONSTRATE EXCELLENCE IN S ERVICE B Y MEETING THE FOLLOWING SERVICE CRITERIA: Demonstration of sustained performance in some combination of or intense focus in the following service activities: Within the institution at the university, school, department or program level. Outside the institution in the community or profession. Examples of service include committees, projects, advisory boards, playing a leadership role, program coordination, review of articles, and accreditation. All should be related to the goals of the University, School, Department, Profession or provide related expertise to the community. 21
22 Suggested/Optional S UG GESTED TENURE PROGRESSION TIMETABLE TEAC HING S C HOLARLY AC TIVITIES YEAR Satisfy all five teaching See requirements 1 & 2 criteria. above in respective area. SERVICE See requirements above in respective area. YEAR 3 & 4 Satisfy all five teaching criteria and demonstrate increased effectiveness in one of the five teaching criteria (e.g., major curriculum work or instructional delivery development). See requirements above in respective area. See requirements above in respective area. YEAR 5 & 6 Satisfy all five teaching criteria and demonstrate increased effectiveness in two of the five teaching criteria e.g., major curriculum work or instructional delivery development). See requirements above in respective area. See requirements above in respective area. 22
23 Appendix C ontractual obligations: The faculty member must meet the contractual responsibilities defined these guidelines and adhere to all policies and procedures set forth in the Handbook for professional personnel as a prerequisite to reappointment consideration. 1. Timely performance of responsibilities specified in the faculty member's contract and the Handbook (in accordance with the academic calendar). 2. Adherence to accepted standards of professional conduct. 3. Faculty shall be responsible for the conduct of assigned classes; shall provide the chair with timely notice in the event that they cannot conduct a class (or classes); and, pursuant to written departmental policy, shall arrange, when possible, for instruction to be provided when they cannot be present - either by a substitute or by class assignment. 4. Faculty shall present to all students attending class, within the time span established by departmental policy, a course description, their NC policy, grading criteria, and special notices required by law or institutional policy (see Academic Policy Manual). 5. Faculty shall, as established by departmental policies, adopt such procedures as necessary to assure that adequate and accurate records of student performance are maintained. 6. Faculty shall establish, post, and keep a minimum of 5 office hours weekly during each academic term of the regular academic year. Faculty granted reassigned time will keep office hours as determined by the chair. 7. The normal teaching load for faculty is 24 semester credit hours per academic year. This load is usually distributed 12 credit hours per semester. In order to accommodate high enrollments during a term or to meet other emergency situations, the University may assign excess loads. Reduction in teaching load in subsequent semesters or terms is authorized in these cases. Overload compensation may be authorized but is not guaranteed, required, or usual when teaching assignments exceed the usual distribution and load adjustments are not 23
24 possible. 8. In addition to their teaching load, faculty members shall prepare for classes, evaluate students' performance, confer with and advise students, and participate in committee work, professional development, service and other appropriate professional activities. Full-time faculty are expected to devote at least 40 hours per week during the contract year to meeting their teaching and other obligations. 9. Faculty shall keep syllabi and student records for all classes for one calendar year after the end of the semester in which the course was taught. 10.Faculty shall comply with all federal and state laws relating to the acquisition, handling, and disposal of hazardous materials and by-products or wastes there from. 24
Department of Child & Family Development Promotion and Tenure Guidelines November 2004
A. Contributions to Teaching Department of Child & Family Development Promotion and Tenure Guidelines November 2004 The Standard Teaching communicates knowledge to students and develops in them the desire
M. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION
faculty evaluation/1 M. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION 1. General Criteria: The professional lives of college faculty members traditionally have been characterized by expectations in the broad categories
Department of Fashion and Interior Design. Policy on Merit Ratings. Accepted October 21, 2009
Department of Fashion and Interior Design Policy on Merit Ratings Accepted October 21, 2009 Full-time faculty are expected to participate in the activities of Teaching, Scholarly Activity, and Service.
PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM STANDARDS FACULTY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM Revised 05/18/2016
PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM STANDARDS FACULTY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM Revised 05/18/2016 The intent of this document is to provide clear guidelines for the evaluation of Physical Therapy faculty for reappointment,
APSU College of Business Policy for Faculty Retention, Tenure, Promotion & Annual Review of Tenured Faculty. For Review by Faculty, August 2013
APSU College of Business Policy for Faculty Retention, Tenure, Promotion & Annual Review of Tenured Faculty For Review by Faculty, August 2013 Teaching Faculty members are expected to engage in a process
UMD Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
UMD Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Indices and Standards for Tenure and Promotion to Professor as Required by Section 7.12 of the Board of Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure (June 10,
DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)
Approved by Academic Affairs May 2010 DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP) I. DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING RTP POLICY A. Preamble B.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty
1 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty Appointment, Reappointment, and Promotion of Clinical Track Faculty (Policy 60.5.10) Individuals whose status is qualified
The School of Education & Human Services The University of Michigan Flint Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure
The School of Education & Human Services The University of Michigan Flint Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure Introduction The primary mission of the University of Michigan Flint is to be the
2. CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, AND PROMOTION OF FULL-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS, UCSDM
Requirements for Fulltime Tenure Track Faculty Requirements for Fulltime Clinical Track Faculty Requirements for Part-time Faculty, Volunteer Faculty and Preceptors Requirements for Emeritus Appendix A:
Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure. School of Social Work and Human Service Social Work Department
Standards and Criteria for Promotion and Tenure School of Social Work and Human Social Work Department TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Preamble... 4 II. Weighting Criteria... 4 III. Appointment Criteria for
SCHOOL OF MASS COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TENURE AND PROMOTION POLICY MISSION STATEMENT
SCHOOL OF MASS COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TENURE AND PROMOTION POLICY MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at The University
Standards for Promotion and Tenure Required by Section 7.12, Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure. Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts
Standards for Promotion and Tenure Required by Section 7.12, Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure Department of Psychology College of Liberal Arts Approved by the Faculty of the Department of Psychology on
College of Education Clinical Faculty Appointment and Promotion Criteria Provost Approved 11/11/11
Introduction: The Clinical Faculty College of Education Clinical Faculty Appointment and Promotion Criteria Provost Approved 11/11/11 In accordance with University guidelines most professional programs
EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR
EVALUATION OF DEPARTMENT CHAIR Background This document is developed based on the Office of Academic Affairs Memorandum No. 05-3 (OAAM 05-3) document. In that document, the department chair s responsibilities
A FRAMEWORK FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MERIT ALLOCATION
I. Premises and Principles A FRAMEWORK FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MERIT ALLOCATION 1. The criteria and standards are common to all programs within the Haile/US Bank College of Business. 1 Each
TENURE AND PROMOTION CRITERIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
1. GENERAL TENURE AND PROMOTION CRITERIA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING The evaluation of candidates for tenure, promotion, and annual evaluation is based upon: (i) teaching, (ii) scholarship, and
I. Preamble... 2. II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria... 2. III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite Faculty... 3. Assistant Professor...
1 Promotion, Tenure and Faculty Standards: Instructional Design Department Table of Contents I. Preamble... 2 II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria... 2 III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines
02 02 10 DRAFT 1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Promotion and Tenure Guidelines For all general information on Promotion and Tenure, refer to the School of Medicine s Office of Faculty
I. Teaching Responsibilities/Instructional Activities
1 Annual Report of Activities Each faculty and librarian member is required to submit a copy of an Annual Report of Activities to the Divisional Chair (or Director of Library) and the Academic Dean by
Tenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
Tenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 UCTP Approval: February 20, 2002 Recommendations of the tenured
PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING FACULTY
NEW FACULTY APPOINTMENTS {approved by unanimous vote on 11/14/2008} In its appointment of tenure-track [Ordinary] faculty, the Department of Public and Community Service Studies is committed to the maintenance
APPOINTMENT TO AND PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF
This policy applies to Faculty only. Appointment Types APPOINTMENT TO AND PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF In policies, practices, and procedures related to faculty appointments, the University shall not engage
School of Music College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY REVIEW AND PROMOTION GUIDELINES
School of Music College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY REVIEW AND PROMOTION GUIDELINES Policy Title: School of Music Non-Tenure Track Faculty Review and Promotion
College of Medicine Promotion and Tenure Procedure FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
College of Medicine Promotion and Tenure Procedure FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY Approved by majority vote of College Faculty March 25, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Governance... 1 a. Membership...
Program Personnel Standards Approval Form. Disciplrne: Nursing. ','J1* )lplll. RTP Committeehair Date i
Program Personnel Standards Approval Form Disciplrne: Nursing ','J1* )lplll RTP Committeehair Date i Introduction Relationship of Discipline Standards to CSU Channel Islands Program Standards To understand
Policy on Academic Tracks and Promotions for the School of Nursing (SON) at the American University of Beirut (AUB)
Policy on Academic Tracks and Promotions for the School of Nursing (SON) at the American University of Beirut (AUB) Preamble The School of Nursing currently has 2 tracks, Academic and Clinical. The Academic
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION Introduction 2-3 Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion 4 Criteria Instructor and Assistant Professor 5 Criteria
Academic Designations Criteria and Standards School of Social Work and the Human Service Department. The Human Service Department
Academic Designations Criteria and Standards School of Social Work and the Human Service Department The Human Service Department April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General Principles... 4 II. Weighting Criteria...
In order to assist and guide faculty members preparing for tenure evaluations, the competencies to be considered are in three categories:
Jerry and Vickie Moyes College of Education TENURE DOCUMENT Approved by Faculty Senate April 16, 2009 Introduction The purpose of this document is to outline the criteria and the procedures used to evaluate
Standards for Faculty Sufficiency & Faculty Qualifications
Standards for Faculty Sufficiency & Faculty Qualifications This document provides the College of Business Administration at The University of Texas Pan American the definitions for and maintenance of the
Engineering Technology Department Bylaws 2011
Engineering Technology Department Bylaws 2011 ARTICLE l. DEPARTMENTAL MEMBERSHIP 1.1 Membership in the Engineering Technology Department consists of all persons holding academic rank in the department.
Faculty Evaluation and Performance Compensation System Version 3. Revised December 2004
Faculty Evaluation and Performance Compensation System Version 3 Revised December 2004 2 SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES FROM EVALUATION SYSTEM, VERSION 1, 2003-2004, TO EVALUATION SYSTEM, VERSION 2, 2004-2005
School of Architecture and Interior Design Criteria for Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure
School of Architecture Interior Design Criteria for Reappointment, Promotion, Tenure College of Design, Architecture, Art, Planning School of Architecture Interior Design Criteria for Reappointment, Promotion,
SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE
SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE The School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy is an interdisciplinary graduate and professional school, designated
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration. Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track
Contents: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track 1. Rationale and Objectives of the Proposal 2. The Simon School Mission
SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW
SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR RETENTION, PROMOTION, TENURE, AND PERIODIC REVIEW This document is to be used in conjunction with the UA Board of Regents policies, University
B. Scholarly Activity
B. Scholarly Activity Scholarly Activity is an essential part of University life and development and encompasses the many pursuits that broaden and expand the learning communities in which faculty function
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS PEER REVIEW
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS PEER REVIEW The College of Nursing and Health Professions Peer Review Process follows requirements stipulated in the AFUM contract
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION Introduction 2-3 Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion 4 Criteria Instructor and Assistant Professor 5 Criteria
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL. RESEARCH (W) TRACK STATEMENT Promotion Criteria and Standards PART 1. MEDICAL SCHOOL PREAMBLE
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL RESEARCH (W) TRACK STATEMENT Promotion Criteria and Standards PART 1. MEDICAL SCHOOL PREAMBLE I. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT This document describes the specific criteria
University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition
University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION, TENURE AND REVIEW I. INTRODUCTION The mission of the Department of Behavioral Health
School of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University
School of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University Policy Revisions: Policy and Procedure for Awarding Promotion, Tenure, and Merit This policy and procedure for awarding promotion, tenure, and merit
Graduate Certificate in University Teaching Handbook
Graduate Certificate in University Teaching Handbook Contents Overview of Graduate Certificate in University Teaching... 2 Program Overview... 2 Why a Graduate Certificate in University Teaching at Concordia?...
Department of Business, Management and Accounting
Department of Business, Management and Accounting Departmental Promotion and Tenure Criteria March 22, 2006 I. Introduction The quality of programs offered in the Department of Business, Management and
The Belk College of Business Policy Statement on Academic and Professional Qualifications
The Belk College of Business Policy Statement on Academic and Professional Qualifications The Belk College of Business is committed to maintaining a faculty of high quality that is consistent with its
Environmental Science/ Environmental Geology M. S.
Environmental Science/ Environmental Geology M. S. Program Learning Goals Obtain advanced knowledge in geoscience and environmental science Upon graduation: have acquired advanced knowledge in earth sciences,
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
Commendable (C): Rating for faculty whose performance clearly and consistently exceeds requirements in principal professional responsibilities.
DEPARTMENT CHAIR S ANNUAL EVALUATION OF FACULTY PERFORMANCE J. WHITNEY BUNTING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Faculty Member Name: Calendar Year: Department Chair Name: This evaluation is to be completed by the department
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING PROMOTION AND TENURE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES
III THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO SCHOOL OF NURSING PROMOTION AND TENURE CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES (Approved by School of Nursing Faculty, April 1998; Revised and approved by School of Nursing
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY THE TEACHERS COLLEGE. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: ED334 Spring, 2011 Three Hours
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY THE TEACHERS COLLEGE CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: ED334 Spring, 2011 Three Hours Instructor: Steve Neill, Associate Professor Office: Visser Hall 203B Address: Box 4037 Emporia, Kansas
THE SELF STUDY DOCUMENT For Undergraduate Only Departmental Reviews
I. The Department/Unit (or Program) II. Resources University at Buffalo Comprehensive Program Reviews The Graduate School THE SELF STUDY DOCUMENT For Undergraduate Only Departmental Reviews A. Mission
SCHOOL of TOURISM Tourism Management Department Promotion and Tenure Standards
SCHOOL of TOURISM Tourism Management Department Promotion and Tenure Standards TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Preamble... 2 II. Weighting... 2 III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite Faculty (see 6.10.7.1)... 3
TENURE & PROMOTION GUIDELINES - APPENDIX
1. Introduction: Construction Management (CM) Department College of Architecture and Construction Management (CoACM) Kennesaw State University Revised November 11, 2015 TENURE & PROMOTION GUIDELINES -
MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE of The City University of New York GUIDELINES FOR THE FACULTY REGARDING REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, AND TENURE
MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE of The City University of New York GUIDELINES FOR THE FACULTY REGARDING REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, AND TENURE Approved by College Council, October 16, 2000 Reviewed by Office of Academic
Department of Applied Arts and Sciences. University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology
1 01/19/2010 Department of Applied Arts and Sciences University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology Unit Standards and Procedures for Faculty Evaluation and Advancement Instructions These unit standards
College of Engineering, Forestry & Natural Sciences Conditions of Faculty Service Guidelines for Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure
College of Engineering, Forestry & Natural Sciences Conditions of Faculty Service Guidelines for Annual Evaluation, Promotion, and Tenure Approved by Vote of the CEFNS Faculty December 18, 2015; 74 yes,
WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM REVISED SPRING 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Development And Evaluation Process: Tenure Track Faculty... 4 Overview Of Mentoring And Evaluation Process
Department of Aviation and Supply Chain Management
Department of Aviation and Supply Chain Management Promotion and Tenure Guidelines I. Overview This document describes expectations for all tenured and tenure track faculty in the Department of Aviation
Graduate Handbook of the Mathematics Department. North Dakota State University May 5, 2015
Graduate Handbook of the Mathematics Department North Dakota State University May 5, 2015 Graduate Program Policies and Handbook 1 Graduate Committee Voting members of the Graduate Committee are the Graduate
BYLAWS COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES (CCS) 1.0 COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES MEMBERSHIP
BYLAWS OF COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES (CCS) 1.0 COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES MEMBERSHIP 1.1 Voting membership shall consist of all AAUP bargaining unit members with appointments in CCS.
University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services. Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation
University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation This document is to be used in conjunction with the UNAC and UAFT Collective
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL Purpose: To consider all matters relating to graduate programs at Tarleton State University and to recommend practices and procedures
Standards for Hiring, Promotion and Tenure of Special-Title Series Faculty School of Journalism and Telecommunications University of Kentucky
Standards for Hiring, Promotion and Tenure of Special-Title Series Faculty School of Journalism and Telecommunications University of Kentucky I. Appointment of special-title faculty to the rank of assistant
COMPARISON OF CLINICIAN TEACHER AND SALARIED CLINICAL FACULTY PATHWAYS, PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES 9/22/14
COMPARISON OF CLINICIAN TEACHER AND SALARIED CLINICAL FACULTY PATHWAYS, PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES 9/22/14 Clinician Teacher Primary responsibilities Clinical care Teaching and/or supervision Scholarship
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK PURPOSE This handbook offers basic information about the procedures and practices of the Honors College at Marshall University. The information presented
Research Scientist Ranks. School of Education. Criteria
08.29 Research Scientist Ranks School of Education Criteria The qualifications for each of the three research ranks are roughly equivalent to those set forth in the area of research for members of the
Graduate Student Handbook of the Mathematics Department
Graduate Student Handbook of the Mathematics Department Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University October 7, 2015 1 1 General Information The Department of Mathematics offers graduate study
Department of Art and Design Governance Document Approved 4-9-2003
Department of Art and Design Governance Document Approved 4-9-2003 I. Preamble The Faculty of the Department of Art and Design subscribes to the principles of shared governance, as elaborated by the Faculty
School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan 2012-2017
School of Accounting Florida International University Strategic Plan 2012-2017 As Florida International University implements its Worlds Ahead strategic plan, the School of Accounting (SOA) will pursue
I. Bylaws 2. II. Mission and Organization of the Department of Psychology 3. III. Administrative Structure of the Department of Psychology 5
BYLAWS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO Approved by the Department Faculty on May 16, 2008 Approved by the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts on March
JOB DESCRIPTION. 4. DEPARTMENT: Faculty of Education and Children s Services - Department of Initial Teacher Education (ITE)
JOB DESCRIPTION 1. JOB TITLE: Senior Lecturer in Art Education 2. HRMS REFERENCE NUMBER: HR14486 3. ROLE CODE: FINSLTSR5 4. DEPARTMENT: Faculty of Education and Children s Services - Department of Initial
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND FOUNDATIONS 2013 APPOINTMENT, SALARY, PROMOTION, AND TENURE POLICIES
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND FOUNDATIONS 2013 APPOINTMENT, SALARY, PROMOTION, AND TENURE POLICIES The following document outlines the Educational Administration and Foundations Department
School of Accountancy Promotion and Tenure Guidelines Adopted 05/05/11
School of Accountancy Promotion and Tenure Guidelines Adopted 05/05/11 I. Overview This document describes expectations for all tenured and tenure track faculty in the School of Accountancy to supplement
BYLAWS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DESIGN COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE AND DANCE THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
BYLAWS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DESIGN COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE AND DANCE THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY Approved by a majority of the faculty, January 11, 2013 ARTICLE I. Purpose, Parameters,
CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007)
CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007) INTRODUCTION Each Clinical Department 1 will develop the
Appendix D: Faculty Evaluation Form Second/Third Year Appointments
Appendix D: Faculty Evaluation Form Second/Third Year Appointments Introduction This form lists criteria dean/supervisors will use to evaluate whether or not expectations have been met in the second-year
Appendix H. Merit Pay Policy Department of Psychology (Approved:11/98; revised: 4/01, 12/06, 4/09, 5/10, 3/12)
Appendix H. Merit Pay Policy Department of Psychology (Approved:11/98; revised: 4/01, 12/06, 4/09, 5/10, 3/12) The Psychology Department s Annual Review of Faculty (ARF) Committee is charged with implementing
College of Education and Health Professions School of Nursing
Annual Performance Evaluations will be considered in promotion and tenure reviews. Criteria for tenure and promotion include (a) superior teaching, (b) scholarship and professional development, and (c)
UAF-UAA Joint PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology with Rural, Indigenous Emphasis Outcomes Assessment Goals, Objectives, and Benchmarks
Page 1 of 16 UAF-UAA Joint PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology with Rural, Indigenous Emphasis Outcomes Assessment Goals,, and Benchmarks Mission The PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology
Appointment, Evaluation, and Promotion of Instructors AddRan College of Liberal Arts
Appointment, Evaluation, and Promotion of Instructors AddRan College of Liberal Arts This document defines the general duties, rights, privileges of Instructors in the AddRan College of Liberal Arts and
Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures. College of Nursing The Ohio State University
Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures College of Nursing The Ohio State University Approved by the College of Nursing Faculty, June 2, 2005 Approved by the Office of Academic Affairs,
