Video conferencing Project Status Report Grant #SJI-06-N-134 Ursula Kaunas



Similar documents
The Cuyahoga County Video conferencing Project includes a total of 48 Endpoints

Evaluation of the Pilot Program for Video Conferencing of ex parte Temporary Protective Order Hearings

Videoconference Network Manual

THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE ALLEGED CONDUCT OF CHEMIST ANNIE DOOKHAN AT THE HINTON DRUG LABORATORY

court. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.

ISDN TO IP: IT S MORE THAN TECHNOLOGY

Improving Court Performance through Improved Communication and Coordination with Other Courts and Agencies: Serbia s Experience

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry

Enhancing Law Enforcement Response to Victims:

CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

TestingEngine. Test4Engine test dumps questions free test engine latest version

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Best Practices for Managing and Working with Virtual Teams. Discussion Question

STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PLANNING PROJECT

Composition of Ohio Courts and Jurisdictions in 2010

Polycom Telejustice Solutions

Project Management Assessment Overview

N. H. Judicial Branch Quarterly Report To The Fiscal Committee of the General Court On Implementation of Recommendations Contained in The Judicial

GUIDE TO USING INTERACTIVE TELEVISION AT NORTH DAKOTA DOCR FACILITIES FOR COURT HEARINGS

JUVENILE COURT TRIAL TACTICS SPONSORED BY THE WSBA IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ROCKY RIVER MUNICIPAL COURT

IP VIDEO TELEPHONY OVERVIEW

HELP AVAILABLE TO VICTIMS OF CRIME IN PENNSYLVANIA

Video Conferencing at McBride Secondary School: Methodology Report. Rosemary Raygada Watanabe. Community Development Institute

Court Case Management Software System Project Report

ADULT PROBATION OFFICER TRAINING STANDARDS

900 South Saginaw St. Flint, Michigan Defender Program. Orientation Materials TYPE OF CASES ASSIGNED TO COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL

Enterprise Unified Communications and Collaboration Services: Audio, Video and Net Conferencing

Shasta County Grand Jury. A Mental Health Crisis, Following the Call The First 72 Hours Matter

MENTAL HEALTH COURTS FAD OR FUTURE?

Chapter 3. Justice Process at the County Level. Brooks County Courthouse

SWGFL Video Conferencing Service Registration of Endpoints. South West Grid for Learning. Version 1.1. Steve Cayley Ian White. Date: February 2004

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES InternalServicesDepartment

Mobile Audio/Video Recorder Policy

Associated Industries of Florida. Getting Smart on Juvenile Crime in Florida: Taking It to The Next Level

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC May 11, 1999

IDS CASE STUDY: Allegheny County

Your Guide to Videoconferencing Save Cost. Save Time. Protect the Environment.

8 Steps to Selecting and Implementing Videoconferencing Solutions in Education

Court Service Communication Strategy

Rate Methodology Task Force Act 55

The Texas District and County Attorneys Association August, 2010

Request for Proposal For Internet Service

Four Top Emagined Security Services

Components of the Strategic Plan

Finance Education: Jury Services Other:

SERVING NON-ENGLISH SPEAKERS IN THE VIRGINIA COURT SYSTEM PAYMENT OF COURT INTERPRETERS PAGE 8-1

Filing Fee $ Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record

How To Build A Large Room For A Conference

Attorneys: Frequently Asked Questions about E-filing

Using Telephony Quick Reference Guide

SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.

How to Raise Money with a Walk-A-Thon

Prepared by the Policy, Performance and Quality Assurance Unit (Adults) Tamsin White

IS YOUR CRIMINAL RECORD HOLDING YOU BACK?

State of Alaska Enterprise Messaging and Directory Services Strategy Vision and Scope

family responsibility office What should I do if I have received a Notice of Default Hearing?

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

MEMORANDUM NOTE DE SERVICE

Criminal Justice Internship CRJ 280

Community Development and Training Centre Semester IT 245 Management Information Systems Chapter 3 Internetwork E-Business Electronic Business

family responsibility office What should I do if I want to keep my driver s licence?

Telepresence and Videoconferencing Insight Newsletter Copyright by Videoconferencing Insight Newsletter, IMP Publications, UK.

Transcription:

Reporting Period March 01, 2009 Issue Date: 03/31/09 Steering Committee Name Phone Email Project Sponsor Michael C. O Malley 216-443-7835 p4mco@cuyahogacounty.us Administrative Sponsor Linda Lingler 216-443-5974 llingler@cuyahogacounty.us Justice Integration SME TBD Joe Kosar 216-443-6016 jkosar@cuyahogacounty.us Technical SME Greg Popovich 216-443-8635 cpgxp@cuyahogacounty.us Pete Szigeti 216-443-7841 p4pzs@cuyahogacounty.us Judicial Agencies SME Kal Alnazer, Juvenile Court 216-443-3541 cjkaa@cuyahogacounty.us Project Evaluator John Matthias 303-308-4350 matthiasj@ncsc.dni.us Grant Administrator Tom Ford 216-698-6559 cntbf@cuyahogacounty.us Project Manager 216-443-8022 ukaunas@cuyahogacounty.us Vendor Project Manager Nick Traenkner, Wide Area Media Project Performance/Action Items Task Phase I Status (Under separate cover) Resource Assigned Target Date % Completed Date Completed Phase II (Under separate cover) Status Summary Joe Kosar, Video conferencing Manager Report: Bridge: The video bridge is now working; the audio codec s within the bridge, were somehow removed from its configuration and reported as a rare occurrence. Despite the minor set back on March 19 th, there have been many successful conferences being done. We have developed a good relationship with Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections (ODRC) and continue to connect to various Ohio Correctional Facilities through the ODRC. We have also been working with Ohio University Distance learning Department (OUCOM) out of Athens, Ohio to host video conferences with Northcoast Behavioral. Page 1 of 6 5/7/2009 Kaunas

Most recently we have established communications with Ohio Department of Youth Services (ODYS) which will prove to be beneficial to Juvenile Court. We are also working closely with Juvenile Court to ensure the presence of video conferencing at the new Juvenile Justice Center. A recent upgrade now allows remote (far end) locations to dial into the county s bridge. This, however, will not be the desired way to conference and will be reserved for use by governmental agencies at the state or federal level or as last resort for connectivity. Go Live Preparation: Grand Jury & Municipal Police Departments: We are working with the Grand Jury Unit and several municipalities to begin testimony to the Grand Jury. Grand Jury testimonies were started in March and are progressing nicely. Below is a list of municipalities that went live: Shaker Heights began on Monday March 16th Parma on Tuesday March 17th Lakewood Thursday on March 19th We are currently working to bring in Cleveland Police Districts (Bureau of Special Operation 6 th floor and the 3 rd District) live for Grand Jury testimony. Other locations include: Beachwood & University Heights: Efforts are being made to address the network issue(s), we are currently working to schedule test calls. There has been added interest in Grand Jury testimonies from North Royalton and Middleburg Heights; we are working to provide them with information and next steps. We are scheduled to do a presentation on Grand Jury Testimony by Video to the Cuyahoga County Chief of Police Association on September 17, 2009. We are looking forward to this opportunity! Juvenile Court Juvenile Court has requested information and the viability to connect to the Ohio Department of Youth Services offices in Columbus, and their local parole offices in Cleveland. ODYS in Columbus is very interested and would support efforts to get a connection in place. We have since established communications with Ohio Department of Youth Services (ODYS) We are planning Go Live efforts with the Coroner s Office, Juvenile Court and the SIU. Court of Common Pleas Page 2 of 6 5/7/2009 Kaunas

The Court of Common Pleas pilot 17 th Floor courtrooms 17-A, B & D completed End User training March 30, 2009 on the Video conferencing mobile unit. The Video conferencing mobile unit was implemented to enhance efficiency in the courtroom and to provide access to teleconferencing offering flexibility and use not only to the Court of Common Pleas Judge(s) but also a wide-range of stakeholders involved throughout the process. There are many studies which support the fact that Video conferencing reduces time delays, saves money and increases public safety. Video conferencing Phase II Project Implementation April Cleveland Public Safety / Police Districts: We have been meeting regularly with Public Safety to keep momentum. IT Technical Teams; Cuyahoga County, Public Safety (MCPC) and Wide Area Media have been meeting since March 6th to establish point to point between the District endpoints and the Grand Jury. Neighboring the gatekeepers is the preferred method and is in progress. SJI Grant Evaluation: BEGINS MAY 1 st! We have made arrangements to begin the State Justice Institute (SJI) Video conferencing Grant Evaluation with The National Center for State Courts (NCSC). The Evaluation will commence on May 1, 2009 and continue for a period of two months (8weeks) ending on June 30, 2009. NOTE: The SJI Video conferencing grant Evaluation is mandated by the SJI, (the Grantor) your participation is required. Participation Details: The Evaluation will begin May 1, 2009 and run for a period of 8 weeks and ending June 30, 2009. Agencies are required to record each time they use the video conferencing equipment during the evaluation period. This is the Quantitative Measure of the evaluation. Quantitative Measure of the Evaluation: Measures the numbers of times during a data-gathering period when the videoconferencing (VC) equipment is used, and the purposes for which it is used. The method of data gathering will largely be a manual process of recording your video conferencing usage. Usage data will be collected from every location, on each side of the conference and/or from every location within a video conferencing session. You will be required to enter information into the USAGE LOG DATA SHEET: (see attached). Completing the USAGE LOG DATA SHEET: Page 3 of 6 5/7/2009 Kaunas

1. The INITIATING AGENT, this is the person who is making or initiating the call (aka: NEAR SIDE) 2. LOCATION : what room are you using? (Some Agencies have multiple rooms) 3. RECEIVING AGENCY is the locations you are calling out to. (aka: FAR SIDE) 4. LOCATION : what Agency specific location are you calling (EX: Shaker Hts Court, Jail or PD) 5. PURPOSE what were you using this for? (EX; BOND INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW) 6. DATE the date of the actual video session. 7. Enter the START TIME & END TIME of your session. 8. Enter the END TIME of your session. ATTENTION: Agency Point of Contacts: Each Agency "POINT OF CONTACT" will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the Evaluation Usage Logs! The USAGE LOGS" are to be maintained daily, have an ample supply placed with the video conferencing equipment. USAGE LOGS are to be submitted at the end of each week. An email with the "USAGE LOG" template attached will be sent to each location "AGENCY POINT OF CONTACT" every Monday morning as a reminder! At the end of each week "Friday" an email will be sent to each Agency "POINT OF CONTACT" with instructions on how & where to remit a copy of the "USAGE LOG. We recommend keeping a copy of the USAGE LOG for your records to capture your own Return on Investment data. The Qualitative portion of the Evaluation: A compiling of survey results of users regarding their experience. It is important to note that the survey is confidential! THE ON-LINE SURVEY start date will be announced at a later date. Instruction as to how you will be required to participate will be provided at that time. We want the focus and attention to be on the USAGE LOGS. The Video conferencing Resources: For your convenience we have posted the following Video conferencing Resource Documents to the County Intranet. We recommend printing this information and placing it with your video conferencing equipment. Remember to check this site periodically as information may be updated as requested. Agency Point of Contact List: Used to schedule point to point calls between agencies/endpoints. Municipal Agency Point of Contact List: Used to schedule point to point calls. Full Service Jail Fax List: Used to fax documents between County Agencies and Remote Jail Facilities FAX Cover Sheet Evaluation Usage Log: Keep ample supply in front of video unit, record each video session and keep on file. Remit copies upon request. Page 4 of 6 5/7/2009 Kaunas

Basic Standard Operating Procedures: How to schedule a video conferencing session... Quick Tips: Placing a Call Help Desk Manual: Planning tips & meeting etiquette, troubleshooting, Video Help Desk, etc... Warranty Information: Warranty info & Expiration dates, Agencies are responsible for maintaining their warranty once it has expired. Tri-Fold Brochure County Intranet link: (FYI: Only Internal Cuyahoga County Agencies are permitted on this site) http://intranet.cuyahoga.cc/home/default.htm Reminder: The Information Services Center has set up an exclusive Video Help Desk to provide assistance for all user agencies. The Video Help Desk will assist in scheduling multipoint (3 or more) video conferences, schedule video conferences with agencies (State & Federal) outside of the county video network and to insure a secure connection and aid in delivering the best quality for videoconferencing services available. Video Conference Help Desk (216) 443-5599 CCVC_ISC@cuyahogacounty.us Issues Grant Balance: As of this reporting period the grant balance is $9000. However there are discrepancies within the FAMIS accounting system that must be reconciled before we can purchase any additional equipment. Reconciliation is in progress and we are close to scheduling with OBM to make the necessary adjustments within FAMIS. Project Cost Digital Document & Electronic Signature: The scope of this Phase II project remains on hold pending the contingency fund balance. For reference on project expenses please refer to Phase I & II Summary Expense spreadsheets. Costs by Category Item Cost Grant Appropriations Salaries 15,750 (Category appropriations are flexible only with Benefits 4,250 the Applicant funds Contracts 110,000 NTE $400,000.00) Equipment 280,000 Key Accomplishments Last Period 1. Cleveland 3D equipment implementation was completed March 12, 2009. 2. 120 Holding equipment implementation was completed March 12, 2009. 3. PVX licenses & camera delivered to Public Safety for implementation in BSO 6 th floor on March 6, 2009. 4. PVX licenses & camera delivered to Public Safety for implementation in BSO 6 th floor on March 6, 2009. Page 5 of 6 5/7/2009 Kaunas

5. Court of Common Pleas pilot 17 th Floor courtrooms 17-A, B & D completed End User training March 30, 2009. Tasks Planned Next Period 1. County & Cleveland Municipal Court network configuration & testing. (Point to point & neighboring gatekeepers). 2. Cleveland Municipal Courtroom 3D & 120 Holding End User & Admin Training. 3. Public Safety to install PVX licenses & camera in BSO 6 th floor. 4. Public Safety to install PVX licenses & camera in District 3. 5. County & Public Safety network configuration & testing. (Point to point & neighboring gatekeepers). Page 6 of 6 5/7/2009 Kaunas