STANFORD UNIVERSITY OFFICE MEMORANDUM. Date:! February 19, 2013. Department Chairs and Program Directors. From:! John Etchemendy!

Similar documents
Interim Report. July 2012

INDIANA UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY (Approved: UFC 4/8/97, 11/24/09; Trustees 5/8/97, 5/2/08)

Massive Open Online Courses

REGULATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Disclosure and Regulation of Outside Activities and Financial Interests.

Art Institute Intellectual Property Policy (MAY 2013)

Encouraging Faculty Participation in Student Recruitment

Brown University Patent and Invention Policy and Copyright Policy

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. 14 December To: Jean- Lou Chameau, President cc: Ed Stolper, Provost

Small Business Innovation Research ( SBIR ) Programs

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HONORS COLLEGE POLICY HANDBOOK

Davis Applied Technology College Curriculum Development Policy and Procedures Training Division

COLLEGE POLICY. Employment Related POLICY TITLE: POLICY TYPE: Intellectual Property POLICY NO.: EMPL-306 RESPONSIBILITY:

ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM. Significant Financial Disclosure Policy for Sponsored Research Investigators

Southwest Texas Junior College Distance Education Policy

Intellectual Property Policy

UNIVERSITY OF DENVER PATENT POLICY. A. Objectives. The objectives of the Patent Policy are as follows:

UMD Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

Guide to Applying to Offer a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) at the University of Michigan

THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

William Paterson University Policy Academic Policy

The George Washington University Faculty Code (pg.4) IV. APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, AND TENURE

BY- LAWS OF THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION, TEACHING & HEALTH

Common Rules Courses leading to the Awarding of a Professional Doctorate (Research) Doctor of

KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT June 20, 2011

No. ES 2.20 Page 1 of 6 Effective Date: 12/02/15. Operations Officer. Original Signed by Mike Reeser TITLE: Chancellor Date: 12/02/15

STATEMENT OF POLICY ON PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

TWENTY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT MIT OPENCOURSEWARE

Tenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208

Sociology Department Faculty Expectations Handbook For Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

IV. Conditions of Academic Appointment

DRAFT (February 7, 2000) Bert Garza. Faculty and Office for Computing and Information Science: Administrative and Management Structure

FAQs Cal State Online

Policy Number: Policy Name: Intellectual Property Policy

SCHOOL OF NURSING BYLAWS

Q&A Intellectual Property Policy

Faculty Governance Structures Review

CONSULTING POLICY GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. (extracted from Faculty Handbook Chapter 7)

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration. Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track

UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY MANITOBA S GATEWAY TO THE WORLD. September 2014

Longwood University Faculty Senate PROPOSAL/POLICY COVER SHEET

Graduate Students Employed as Teaching Assistants and Graduate Part-time Instructors

Royalty Disclosure Form and Guidelines College of Arts and Architecture Pennsylvania State University

The Centre for the Study of Ministry: Governance and Administrative Structure

Fall Summer W e s t e r n C o n n e c t i c u t S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

Statement of the Kelley School of Business MBA Code of Student Ethics

MOOC experiences at San Jose State University

Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS

The University of Western Ontario

UWW Faculty Sabbatical FAQs. Application and Acceptance: 1. What is a sabbatical?

FACULTY BYLAWS E. J. OURSO COLLEGE OF BUSINESS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL & MECHANICAL COLLEGE

Proposed Regents' Bylaws Revisions Revisions to Regents' Bylaws 2.13, 5.08, 5.11, 5.19, 11.22, 11.24, 11.38, 11.43, 11.44, and 11.

Pasco-Hernando Community College Operational Guidelines

Department of Applied Arts and Sciences. University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology

Board Policy 7215 Faculty, Counselor and Librarian Responsibilities

Blended course redesign for large enrollment classes. Alan Aycock, Ph.D. Learning Technology Center University of Wisconsin Milwaukee June 2009

Reference Sheet for Teaching Assistants Resources and Regulations. Marcia Groszek

Traditional courses are taught primarily face to face.

Online Program. An academic program that contains only online courses.

CHARTER of ADA University

CERTIFICATE IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROGRAM JUNE 16 AUGUST 8, 2014

[A series of papers, whether published or otherwise, is not acceptable for submission as a thesis.

SABBATICAL LEAVES OF ABSENCE

Missouri Baptist University Center for Distance Learning

SENIOR ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATOR POSITIONS RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Policy Statement. For Graduate Student Researchers

RANK AND PROMOTIONS GUIDELINES REVISED OCTOBER 2008

I, Salvador Antonetti Zequeira, Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the. University of Puerto Rico, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

A Case for Change elearning Integration at York University Summary and Recommended Actions

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) Bylaws for Program Structure

MEMORANDUM. Gary Perry, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affair

Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Geography Bylaws. Article I. The Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Geography

Ownership of Online Course Material

GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION

EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE POLICY ON INDUSTRY AND OTHER EXTERNAL PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS. Table of Contents

Northwestern State University Electronic and Continuing Education Departmental Guidelines

James Madison University. Best Practices for Online Programs

Guidelines for Graduate Teaching Assistantships and Instructional Assistants at The George Washington University

NUMBER: Policy on Intellectual Property

What the MOOC? Massive Open Online Courses at Northwestern University. January 15, 2014 AHEAD Meeting at Norris Center

In-House Leadership Development Programs for Faculty and Staff

Distance Learning Policy With Proposed Procedures

University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition

DUAL CREDIT PROGRAM ARTICULATION AGREEMENT

CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY FRANCES PAYNE BOLTON SCHOOL OF NURSING BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF THE BYLAWS

Office of Financial Services March 2003

SABBATICAL LEAVES OF ABSENCE

Policy on Academic Tracks and Promotions for the School of Nursing (SON) at the American University of Beirut (AUB)

CHAPTER TWO General Institutional Requirements

GEORGIA TECH ONLINE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE CHARLES ISBELL SENIOR ASSOCIATE DEAN

THE GRADUATE SCHOOL CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY. By-Laws. ARTICLE I Definitions

NORTH CENTRAL NOW! Student Handbook. December 2014

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Administrative Policy for Faculty Compensation

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY REGARDING APM ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Special Services to Individuals and Organizations

School of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University

The system-wide central MEES office will oversee the program.

Are you ready to meet the challenges of the working world? Co-op can help

BY LAWS. of the FACULTY. of the COLLEGE OF BUSINESS

ARTICLE I: OBJECTIVE A.

Transcription:

STANFORD UNIVERSITY OFFICE MEMORANDUM Date:! February 19, 2013 To:! Department Chairs and Program Directors From:! John Etchemendy! Provost Subject:! Policy clarifications concerning online instruction Dear Colleagues, As you may recall, President Hennessy appointed a Presidential Advisory Committee on Technology in Higher Education in February 2012. The committee was asked to provide guidance to the university and its leadership in the areas of educational technology and its use both on-campus and off. The committee was chaired by John Mitchell (Computer Science), who was joined by faculty Peter DeMarzo (GSB), Harry Elam (Drama), Bernd Girod (EE), Larry Kramer (Law), Rafe Mazzeo (Math), Jim Plummer (Engineering), Charles Prober (Medicine), Garth Saloner (GSB), and Dan Schwartz (Education). The committee included ex officio members Charlie Junkerman (Continuing Studies) and Paul Marca (Stanford Center for Professional Development). The committee met bi-weekly from early March until June and produced a report, available at http://facultysenate.stanford.edu/2012_2013/reports/ SenD6689_online_educ_rpt.pdf. Among other things, the Committee proposed clarifications to existing University policies on ownership and distribution of courses and course materials, and on teaching at other institutions. The policy clarifications were discussed with the Executive Cabinet, the University Advisory Board, the Steering Committee of the Senate, and the Board of Trustees. John Mitchell, who was appointed Vice Provost for Online Learning in August, subsequently met with faculty across the university to hear their perspectives. On October 25th, Vice Provost Mitchell and Senior Associate Deans Peter DeMarzo (GSB), Bernd Girod (Engineering) and Charles Prober (Medicine) led a discussion in the Faculty Senate on the Committee s report, online education activities at Stanford, and the proposed policy clarifications. Based on the Committee s recommendations and guidance from the Faculty Senate, Advisory Board, Executive Cabinet and Board of Trustees, we will be clarifying and updating the relevant university policies as outlined in the attached policy statement. Briefly, the statement clarifies that our longstanding prohibition on teaching for other institutions also applies to online instruction, and how our policy governing the ownership of courses and course material applies in the context of electronic 1 of 2

STANFORD UNIVERSITY OFFICE MEMORANDUM distribution. Also attached is an FAQ document providing information for those interested in getting involved in the online initiative. I hope you will make both documents available to your faculty and teaching staff. I wish to express my thanks to all of the faculty members who have provided advice and guidance on these important issues, and particularly to the members of the Presidential Advisory Committee, who represented their schools with such dedication. Best regards, 2 of 2

Statement on Outside Teaching and Online Course Materials The Presidential Advisory Committee on Technology in Higher Education was convened in February 2012 to provide guidance on the use of educational technology both on and off campus. The committee issued a report in June 2012 in which the committee expressed its belief that Stanford s primary educational mission is to educate students admitted to the University s programs. At the same time, the committee recognized faculty interest in extending the impact of their scholarship through external distribution of courses. In light of the committee s findings and recommendations, the following policy clarifications will be made to the Research Policy Handbook and the Faculty Handbook. Outside Teaching Activities The committee recognized that faculty owe their primary teaching duty to the University and that any teaching outside the University must be consistent with the University s policies on conflict of commitment and interest. Under longstanding University policy, a faculty member is normally not permitted to accept or hold a regular teaching, research or administrative position at another institution. This is true regardless of whether the faculty member is on regular duty at Stanford, on sabbatical, or on leave without salary. The policy is consistent with the expectations of our students that, through their admission to the University and payment of tuition, they will receive a unique educational experience from exceptional Stanford faculty that is not available elsewhere. The committee noted that this policy should apply regardless of whether the teaching is provided in person or through an electronic format. Merely limiting the creation of course materials for another institution to consulting hours, a vacation or an off duty quarter does not address the potential conflict with the faculty member s obligations to the University and its students. Such outside teaching activities can be at odds with University policies on conflict of commitment and interest by diverting attention from the appointee s work at Stanford, competing with existing programs offered by the University, or undermining the development of new programs at the University. In addition, such activities may inappropriately rely upon University resources (including its personnel and students) that are funded by tuition payments and by contributions from donors and extramural funders for the non-profit teaching and research activities of the University. Accordingly, Faculty, Academic Staff and Other Teaching Staff with a primary employment affiliation with the University, as reflected in an appointment of more than 50% for a year or longer, are not permitted to teach for another institution or otherwise teach extramural courses without the approval of the Provost, except through a Stanford-sponsored program or agreement with that institution. Individuals who are employed by the University in an appointment of 50% or less time do not owe their primary teaching duty to Stanford and therefore may teach for another institution, as long as such teaching does not interfere with their duties at Stanford. However, they may not use their Stanford title or affiliation in any way to promote the teaching activity at the other institution or to imply that there is Stanford sponsorship of the activity. The committee noted that the University s name is a significant University resource and implicates the interests 1

of not only the University, but also the reputation and academic standing of the professoriate. Accordingly individuals who are permitted to teach elsewhere should prevent the other institutions with whom they work from using the Stanford name or its insignias, identifying them as Stanford instructors (as opposed to instructors at the institution in which the courses are offered), or making statements that imply that Stanford sponsors, endorses or otherwise vouches for their courses. In extended biographical descriptions, such individuals may refer to the fact that they have taught at the University. This policy does not prohibit the academic tradition of teaching in a visiting capacity at other non-profit educational institutions during sabbatical leaves, giving occasional guest lectures or presenting a tutorial or short course at a scientific conference. However, approval from the cognizant dean is required before any electronic materials created in connection with such teaching may be used as a course or a significant portion of a course by another institution after the conclusion of the faculty member s visit. Faculty members and other academic appointees are responsible for complying with this policy and should consult with their deans or the Vice Provost for Online Learning before pursuing activities that might be problematic under this policy. Distribution of Course Materials The committee acknowledged that under existing University policy, courses taught and courseware developed by faculty while employed by the University belong to Stanford. The committee noted that this policy should continue to apply regardless of the form of expression, including courses captured on video or in other digital forms. However, faculty are permitted to make written course materials they personally create available to peers at other academic institutions for noncommercial academic or personal use outside the University. Additionally, if a faculty member leaves the University, he or she may continue to use, at another non-profit academic institution, course material he or she created at Stanford. Faculty creating textbooks that include additional course materials should not allow publishers to assert broad control over derivative works and limit the ability of the faculty member or the University to use and distribute the course materials in the future. Faculty may include course materials owned by the University in textbooks under a free license from the University; however, the faculty member s contract with a publisher should contain terms acknowledging the University s ownership interest in the course materials and require prior consent by the University for the creation and distribution of derivative works. Compensation for Course Development If a department or school specifically commissions the development of course content or courseware, the payment of any supplementary compensation will be consistent with the existing policies set forth in Section 5.1 of the Faculty Handbook and relevant school policies. Consistent with the existing University policies regarding the commercialization of inventions, any commercialization of course content and courseware created and taught at Stanford will be undertaken by the University. The University will not, however, undertake any 2

commercialization without the agreement of the faculty-creator and will ensure that any revenue arising from commercialization will be shared with the creators, their departments and schools, as is done with patent income. 3

Stanford Online Learning Frequently Asked Questions Why is Stanford supporting the development of online courses? The development of online teaching and learning material will give students new learning opportunities and help faculty explore new ways to reach their students more effectively. Properly researched and evaluated, these innovations may over time enable the development of new programs and new options within existing programs. For example, online courses may allow Stanford undergraduates to take a wider range of courses while resident at overseas campuses. Stanford could also consider developing hybrid or online certificate programs based on online courses. More broadly, the development of online courses will allow the University to explore the public benefit by making course material available to teaching programs at other colleges and universities and by providing wide public access to selected learning experiences. What are the benefits of the recent online learning experiments? For many faculty, offering parts of their courses (like lectures) online has allowed them to rethink interactions they have with students in the classroom. No longer bound by the need to lecture in class, instructors have explored activities that are challenging, engaging, and fun for students. These opportunities may include in-class group projects, simulations, fieldwork, role-playing, in-depth discussions, problem solving, and other forms of participatory inquiry. Some professors have posted their lectures online and used in-video quizzes to identify areas where students are struggling and need additional hands-on practice. Some have used online technologies to provide rich and timely feedback to students or to offer discussion opportunities outside of class. Online learning experiments produce a large amount of data that faculty can analyze to assess effectiveness of the techniques. We encourage all professors who are designing online learning experiments to build assessment plans into the design of their experiments. Can I get funding for course development? The Office of the Vice Provost for Online Learning (VPOL) has offered seed grants for faculty members across campus to develop online and blended learning experiences. Faculty can use the grants to experiment with new models of teaching, as well as to conduct research to determine what works best. The seed grants awarded last June helped to pay for teaching assistants, video specialists and equipment, and to develop peer evaluation models and grading rubrics. Some schools have offered to match funds or provide additional resources to faculty who receive VPOL grants. Further information about the continuing seed grant program can be found at online.stanford.edu. Is there staff support for creating online teaching and learning material? VPOL supports faculty through the following efforts: The pedagogy team can suggest new teaching and learning models, help design ways to collect data from each course, and facilitate research evaluating the success of experiments. 1

Stanford Online Learning Frequently Asked Questions The production team can assist faculty in producing course content by providing equipment and services (including editing, training, compliance, guidance etc.) The platform team can assist faculty in choosing an appropriate platform for hosting their online material, and can advise those interested in developing topic-specific software, such as simulations or auto-grading methods that work well with online platforms. The VPOL staff and students collaborate with other on-campus organizations such as the Center for Teaching and Learning, Academic Computing, Continuing Studies, the Stanford Center for Professional Development, and school-based course design and production teams. VPOL will help form a support team for each project, drawing from these resources as well as educational research support from the School of Education. What platforms are available for offering courses? There are a growing number of platforms for hosting online classes. Two Stanford-based platforms are currently available to all faculty, each with particular features, tools and assessment techniques. Class2Go is a Stanford-supported opensource, nonprofit platform that has been successful for on-campus and public course delivery. The Class2Go team is available to develop custom features for specific courses, instrument courses to collect educational research data, and facilitate other facultyinitiated innovations. The Venture Lab platform allows people from around the globe to collaborate directly on group projects. The Stanford Center for Professional Development at the School of Engineering also continues its long tradition of online education. Among external platforms, Stanford has offered courses on Coursera, a for-profit company founded by two faculty members, and on Stanford on itunes U (including the phenomenally successful course on apps development), as well as on Stanford on YouTube. Are there any differences in preparing an online course for the public (a MOOC), versus preparing a course for our enrolled students? There are a number of additional steps required in the preparation of course content for public courses relating to copyright clearance and other matters. The staff in VPOL can provide guidance and assistance with these issues. Do I need to get approval to offer a course online? Yes, you must get written approval from your dean in order to offer an online course that is open to the public. Under existing policy, courses taught and courseware developed while you are employed by the University belong to Stanford. You may fill out the form available at online.stanford.edu/resources, which VPOL will circulate to deans and school representatives for notice and approval. 2

Stanford Online Learning Frequently Asked Questions Can I get paid for creating a course? If a department or school specifically commissions the development of course content or courseware, the payment of any supplementary compensation will be consistent with the existing policies within the school. To the extent that revenue is generated from an online course, the University will ensure that the revenue is shared with the faculty member, department and school, similar to the treatment of patent royalties. Will efforts to create courses for use outside of Stanford be considered in the reappointment and promotion process? No. Efforts to develop and offer online courses for students enrolled at Stanford will be considered through the existing teaching evaluation process. However, online courses developed solely for the public are not evaluated or considered in the appointment and promotion process. May I get teaching relief if I create an online course for Stanford students? You should consult your department chair and dean regarding the policy in your school. Can I permit course materials to be used outside of Stanford? You may make course materials that you have personally created, such as syllabi, assessments, slides, or lecture notes, available for noncommercial academic or personal use outside the University or to instructors at other non-profit institutions. If other University faculty or staff contributed to the course materials, you must first obtain their consent. Faculty interested in publicly posting a substantial portion of a course or a video should first consult their department chairs and deans since some departments may prefer to reserve certain course materials for students enrolled at the University. In light of the high risk of misappropriation of electronic course materials once they are in circulation, it is important to take some precautions before distributing the materials. The course materials should include the following proprietary notice: Copyright [year] The Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University. All Rights Reserved. VPOL and OTL can also provide advice on license language to protect against commercial exploitation of course materials. If I leave Stanford can I use the course material at another non-profit academic institution? If you leave the University you may use, at another non-profit academic institution, written and illustrative course material you personally created at Stanford, such as syllabi, assessments, slides, and lecture notes. 3

Stanford Online Learning Frequently Asked Questions Can I include course materials in my textbook? Yes, you may include traditional written and illustrative material from your course in a book. However, you may not enter into a contract with a publisher that attempts to limit your ability, or that of the University, to use and distribute the course materials in the future or to create derivative works. VPOL and OTL can provide advice on license language to include in publishing agreements to protect against this. Can I teach for another institution or course provider? Under longstanding University policy, a faculty member is not allowed to hold a regular teaching, research or administrative position at another institution. This is true regardless of whether the instruction is carried out in person or online and whether the faculty member is on regular duty at Stanford or on leave. This policy reflects the expectations of our students that, through their admission to the University and payment of tuition, they will receive a unique educational experience from exceptional Stanford faculty that is not available elsewhere. Accordingly, Faculty, Academic Staff and Other Teaching Staff with a primary employment affiliation with the University, as reflected in an appointment of more than 50% time for a year or longer, are not permitted to teach for another institution without the approval of the Provost, unless there is a Stanford-sponsored program or agreement with that institution. Individuals who are employed by the University in an appointment of 50% time or less do not owe their primary teaching duty to Stanford and therefore may teach for another institution, as long as such teaching does not interfere with their duties at Stanford. What about occasional teaching at other nonprofit academic institutions? Faculty may continue the academic traditions of teaching at other non-profit educational institutions during sabbatical leaves or of giving occasional guest lectures. However, approval from your dean is required before any electronic materials created in connection with such teaching may be used as a course or a significant portion of a course at another institution. Can I teach in person or online or create course materials for another institution if I limit the activity to my consulting hours? No. Merely limiting the activity to consulting hours, a vacation or an off-duty quarter does not address the potential conflict with the faculty member s obligations to the University and its students. Such outside teaching activities can be at odds with University policies on conflict of commitment and interest by: diverting attention from the individual s work at Stanford, competing with existing programs offered by the University, or undermining the development of new programs at the University. In addition, such activities may inappropriately rely upon University resources (including its personnel and students) that are funded by tuition payments and by contributions from 4

Stanford Online Learning Frequently Asked Questions donors and extramural funders to support the non-profit teaching and research activities of the University. If I have an appointment of 50% time or less, can I use the Stanford name in connection with my teaching and course materials at another institution? You may not use your Stanford title or affiliation in any way to promote the teaching activity at the other institution or to imply that there is Stanford sponsorship of the activity. The University s name is a significant University resource and implicates the interests of not only the University, but also the reputation and academic standing of the professoriate. If you choose to teach elsewhere, you should prevent the other institution with whom you work from doing any of the following: using the Stanford name or its insignias, identifying you as a Stanford instructor (as opposed to an instructor at the institution in which the course is offered), or making statements that imply the University sponsors, endorses or otherwise vouches for your courses. In extended biographical descriptions, you may refer to the fact that you have taught at the University. Where can I go if I have questions regarding online education? Pleases see the Faculty Resources section of the VPOL site: http://online.stanford.edu/resources Several of Stanford's schools have also appointed senior associate deans to lead their respective online education initiatives: Peter DeMarzo (GSB), pdemarzo@stanford.edu Bernd Girod (Engineering), bgirod@stanford.edu Charles Prober (Medicine), cprober@stanford.edu 5