OREGON OSHA PESTICIDE EMPHASIS PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT



Similar documents
2009 Handbook of Employment Regulations Affecting Florida Farm Employers and Workers: Worker Protection Standard -- EPA [Federal] 1

Pesticides Matter. Reduce your exposure to toxic pesticides and protect your health and the health of your family

OSHA Regulation and the Growing Popularity of Employee Leasing Programs. Including Temporary Worker Services and Professional Employer Organizations

Pesticide Spills. Chapter 26. In This Chapter. Keywords. Accidents. Pesticides Act and Environmental Protection Act

End-of-Year Review Report for the Fiscal Year 2010 Pesticide Cooperative Agreements

OSHA Compliance Checklist ASC

Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division Department of Consumer and Business Services

SUBJECT: Audit Report Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration Recordkeeping Requirements (Report Number HR-AR )

WEEKLY SAFETY MEETING All Euramax Subsidiaries MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) Safety Meeting Contents. Meeting Notice.

EMPLOYEE SAFETY TRAINING PROCEDURE

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Blitz Stakeholder Webinar September 15, 2011

DEC WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD INSPECTION

PESTICIDE USE COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR EMPLOYERS AND BUSINESSES

RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM

Ohio Pesticide Law Summary of Changes/Requirements for the Landscape, Lawn and Nursery

Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division Department of Consumer and Business Services

MISSOURI GUIDELINES FOR PESTICIDE TECHNICIAN TRAINING PROGRAMS

Loss Control TIPS Technical Information Paper Series

TNRCC WATER QUALITY INVESTIGATOR TRAINING PROGRAM

State Monitor Advocate Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

BOS 3525, Legal Aspects of Safety and Health Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes.

Why Do We Need Diagnostic Tests and Biomarkers for Pesticides? Matthew Keifer MD MPH University of Washington

XI. LABOR Labor Laws and Regulations Statewide Labor Policy Labor Regulations

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT HAZARD ASSESSMENT, EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND TRAINING DOCUMENTATION

C162 Asbestos Convention, 1986

Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA) 1994

North Carolina Container Recycling Successes and Challenges

Glutaraldehyde Policy

Texas Department of Insurance. Provided by. Personal Protective Equipment. Division of Workers' Compensation HS96-101C (10-06)

Prepublication Copy Notice:

How To Predict Personal Protective Equipment (Ppe)

Healthy and Safety Awareness for Working Teens Unit 5 Communicating Workplace Problems

OSHA SAFETY TRAINING TABLE for more information see

OSHA s General Duty Clause: A Guide to Enforcement & Legal Defenses

OSHA Training Guidelines (An Unofficial Summary)

Safety Meeting Topic: Chemical Spills and Emergency Action Plans for General Industry

OREGON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES PROGRAM DIRECTIVE

OREGON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES PROGRAM DIRECTIVE

I. Purpose. Roles and Authorities. Enforcement. A. Referrals

European Conference on Safe Use of Plant Protection Products

INTRODUCTION TO OSHA PRESENTATION

KEY CAL/OSHA STANDARDS THAT APPLY TO MOST EMPLOYERS

Training Requirements for the Revised Hazard Communication Standard

Questions and Answers (Q&A) about OSHA s National Emphasis Program (NEP) Occupational Exposure to Isocyanates

The MSDS format adheres to the standards and regulatory requirements of the United States and may not meet regulatory requirements in other countries.

GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE UK GLPMA POLICY ON THE USE OF NON-GLP FACILITIES FOR THE CONDUCT OF STUDY PHASES.

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT PROGRAM

Mercyhurst University Athletic Training Program Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan

PESTICIDE SAFETY AND OTHER PESTICIDE INFORMATION

Citation and Notification of Penalty

2012 Executive Summary

STAKEHOLDER PENSION. KEY FEATURES. This is an important document that you should read and keep in a safe place. You may need to read it in future.

THE IMPACT OF GHS ON DISTRIBUTORS

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

Oregon State Library Policy

OSHA LIABILITY FEDERAL

June12-13, 2012 Sinaia Romania. Safe Use Initiative France

Emerging Issues in OSHA Enforcement and Liability

3. Asbestos Abatement Course 1. Introduction and Background to Asbestos Abatement. 4. Health Effects and Medical Surveillance

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM THE CALIFORNIA PESTICIDE ILLNESS SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

Health and safety on the job: Your rights and responsibilities

Child Passenger Safety Program (CPS) Project Specifications FFY 2013

Management Plan For Control of Blood-borne Pathogens, Infectious Wastes and Other Potentially Hazardous Biological Agents

A BILL FOR AN ACT BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: 2 scale, outdoor commercial agricultural operations in Hawaii has

Q s. A s for Small Business Employers

CAREERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH

AN AUDIT OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSÉ S CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL CENTER

STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY: DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OVERSIGHT OF WHOLESALERS COMPLIANCE WITH THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LAW

PPE hazard assessment

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OSHA COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

How to Comply With the Worker Protection Standard For Agricultural Pesticides What Employers Need to Know

Health and Safety Department. Health and Safety Policy. Version Author Revisions Made Date 1 Paul Daniell First Draft (in this format) 11 July 2014

State and Local Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs: The Impact of Federal Public Health Funding Cuts

Introduction to OSHA for General Industry. Presented by: John Boysen, MS Safety Consultant OSHA Consultation Program at CSU

Pesticide Regulations Update. George Hamilton Specialist in Pest Management Rutgers University

ALL INJURIES MUST BE REPORTED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE INCIDENT TO BOTH THE SITE ADMINISTRATION AND THE CALL CENTER.

Minnesota OSHA Workplace Inspections

SCDHSC0032 Promote health, safety and security in the work setting

The Company Safety and Health Plan. The Company Safety and Health Plan. Contents. Employer / Instructor Notes:

Office of Advocacy. Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Draft Proposed Safety and Health Program Rule 29 CFR 1900.

JAN outdoor commercial agricultural operations in Hawaii has. been increasing. Unlike the majority of Hawaii's farmers, these

Concep. CAUTION See additional precautionary statements and directions for use inside booklet. ONE GALLON U.S. Standard Measure HERBICIDE ANTIDOTE

Workplace Health-and-Safety Violations in Agriculture: Epidemiology and Implications for Education and Enforcement Policy

Environmental Education Associates

THE FOUNDATION OF A SAFE WORKPLACE

FDA Refusals of Food Imports by Exporting Country Group

Rice University Laser Safety Manual

NEHA Food Safety Certificate Program Handbook

The Comprehensive Environmental Response,

INFORMATION ON CHANGES IN CPCC AF, CB, F&V, FO, PPM, TE, AB, LB, PY and CROPS RULES IN IFA VERSION Publication 1 st July 2016

Contractor Management Applying Safety Analytics and Insurance Benchmarking

United States General Accounting Office GAO. High-Risk Series. February Farm Loan Programs GAO/HR-95-9

Outreach Training Program

Preparation for 2006 Busy Season for Emergency Pest Control Programs under Section 18 of FIFRA

Outline. What is IPM Principles of IPM Methods of Pest Management Economic Principles The Place of Pesticides in IPM

Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources Cluster Cluster (Foundation) Knowledge and Skill Statements

Corporate Training. Occupational Safety, Health, and Environmental Management. Certificate Program. extension.uci.edu/corporate

Scoring. AIB Consolidated Standards for Inspection. The scoring described in this booklet supersedes. all previous scoring methods used in all AIB

Guidelines For Occupational Safety and Health Programs

Hazard Communication/Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Program

Transcription:

OREGON OSHA PESTICIDE EMPHASIS PROGRAM ANNUAL REPORT Federal Fiscal Year 2003 February 27, 2004 Prepared by Garnet R Cooke Pesticide Coordinator

Oregon OSHA Pesticide Emphasis Program FY 2003 Annual Report Introduction This is the fourth year in a working relationship between Oregon OSHA (OR-OSHA) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 10, Pesticide Enforcement Unit. OR-OSHA enforces the Worker Protection Standard which is supplemented with an inspection emphasis program. This report is an annual review of the pesticide emphasis program for federal fiscal year 2003 (FFY 2003). The data elements and analysis are presented, along with recommendations for program improvements for the coming year. Overall, this has been a productive year in meeting inspection goals and increasing outreach through voluntary services. Data Elements The data elements examined in this report are based on OR-OSHA s Program Directive A-235, entitled Local Emphasis Program for Pesticides. This year s report includes graphics which illustrate a four year comparison of the inspection data. For this past growing season, five Standard Industrial Classifications (SICs) were selected to focus inspection activity on pesticide usage and worker protection issues: SIC 0139 Field Crops, except Cash Grains, Not Elsewhere Classified SIC 0172 Grapes SIC 0175 Deciduous Tree Fruits SIC 0191 General Farming SIC 0721 Crop preparation including pesticide spraying Other SICs inspected as a result of complaints, referrals or programmed Agricultural Health inspections are included in this report if the inspection addressed pesticide-related issues. In addition, as a result of the Pesticide Emphasis Program completing four years of activity, a discussion of the effectiveness of the program will be included in this report. Page 1

Data Summary The Pesticide Emphasis Program continues to be an effective tool in reducing occupational exposures from pesticides in the agriculture industry. The following is a brief summary of findings resulting from the evaluation of FFY 2003 activity: In FFY 2003 70 inspections were completed which identified 254 pesticide-related violations. 47 of the 70 inspections covered standard industrial classifications (SIC) identified in the emphasis program. Employers whose SIC is identified in the Program Directive will be referred to as selected SIC s for the purposes of this report. 20% of these violations were classified as serious 10 of the inspections resulted in civil penalties directly related to violations of the Worker Protection Standard. Hazard Communication, pesticide training and the lack of various decontamination supplies accounted for over 60% of the violations. 80% of the violations cited related to the pesticide handlers who work with concentrated pesticides. In FFY 2003 20% of the employers inspected had been inspected by OR-OSHA within the last four years. Of this group only one repeat violation was identified. In FFY 2003, 31 inspections were attempted but were unable to be conducted for various reasons. In FFY 2002 OR-OSHA adopted the Tier One and Tier Two inspection category system from Federal EPA. Tier One inspections are those inspections which are initiated within the last 30 days of a pesticide application. If pesticides have not been applied in the previous 30 days the inspection is considered to be Tier Two. In the selected SIC s 80% of the inspections completed in FFY 2003 were categorized as Tier One. It is important to note that the majority of the inspections were accomplished during or shortly after pesticides had been applied which is when occupational exposures are likely. The scheduling system implemented in FFY 2003 effectively reduced the number of employers that are repeated in the inspection process from year to year. Although repeat inspections will continue to happen, only one repeat violation was identified in FFY 2003. Violations continue to be identified during inspections of employers who have not been inspected under the Pesticide Emphasis Program in previous years. In FFY 2003 the agency continued its outreach efforts: The Pesticide Emphasis Program information was added to OR-OSHA s Agricultural Web page. Page 2

Health Analyst Chris Ottoson and Pesticide Coordinator Garnet Cooke prepared Productive Partnerships: Improving Pesticide Safety in Oregon, which Chris Ottoson presented at the 2003 American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition in Dallas, Texas. Senior Health Compliance Officer Timothy Capley conducted presentations on WPS for the Oregon Cranberry Farmer s Alliance and at the 2003 Inter-mountain Agricultural Conference. Senior Health Compliance Officer Lori Cohen conducted training for OR-OSHA s consultative services staff. Notably, the consultations completed in the selected SICs increased from nine to 40 in FFY 2003. Externally, Ms Cohen provided pesticide training for the Oregon Golf Course Superintendent s Association. Pesticide Coordinator Garnet Cooke presented Preventing Pesticide Accidents at Linn-Benton Community College. Health Enforcement Manager Stan Thomas completed work with the National Assessment of the Worker Protection Standard group in Washington, D.C. The annual training of the pesticide enforcement team was completed in March 2003 and included the Oregon Department of Agriculture, EPA Region 10 and OR- OSHA s Technical Section. CONCLUSIONS As a result of the Pesticide Emphasis Program, OR-OSHA is having an impact on preventing occupational pesticide exposures in Oregon. This is accomplished through interventions with employers, whether by means of inspections, consultations or training where exposure scenarios are identified and if not in compliance are ultimately corrected. While an occupational exposure does not necessarily result in an immediate pesticide illness, those that do become a reportable condition in Oregon. A direct reduction of pesticide illnesses in the state is difficult to quantify due to two main factors: failure of the affected individual to seek medical attention, as that person may not associate the flu-like symptoms of organophosphate poisoning with pesticide poisoning, or if medical treatment is sought, improper recognition of the condition by the physician. The Pesticide Emphasis Program was developed with the understanding that employee exposures to pesticides can occur through a variety of ways. Direct exposure to concentrate can occur during mixing/loading activities or spills, as well as from exposure to dilute formulations during applications- through improper work practices, lack of proper personal protective equipment, drift, re-entry issues, spills, handling contaminated equipment, poorly maintained equipment, accidents and the inability to properly remove concentrate or residues from the skin. Page 3

The violations cited correlated with areas where exposures could occur. In FFY 2003, hazard communication, pesticide training and lack of various decontamination supplies accounted for almost two-thirds of the violations cited. While there were violations relating to personal protective equipment, these tended to apply to specific requirements associated with personal protective equipment, e.g., an employee not having a respirator fit test prior to wearing a respirator, rather than the lack of a respirator. Knowledge of the health effects of pesticides, how to safely handle the products and the equipment, and steps to take in an emergency are critical for employees working with pesticides. That knowledge and the ability to remove pesticides from the skin or eyes are essential in preventing exposures, or if exposed, minimizing the effects. 80% of the violations related to handlers who work with concentrated pesticides. These violations are fairly consistent to FFY2002, and appear to be related to information not found on the pesticide label. The Pesticide Emphasis Program has been effective in addressing pesticide safety issues: hazardous conditions and potential exposures are being removed through inspections focused in key agricultural operations; emphasis inspection targeting remains on employers who have not been inspected in the last two years; the primary hazards and violations seen in selected SICs remain valid; voluntary services (consultations, training, audiovisuals, etc.) continue as essential resources for employers seeking assistance. GOALS for 2004 For the coming fiscal year, our goals include: maintain the same performance levels achieved this past year; continue pesticide emphasis inspections with the current scheduling list; provide an annual training day for OR-OSHA staff and other agency stakeholders; develop and implement an outreach and enforcement strategy for employers covered under the recently adopted Division 7, Forest Activities standard; and encourage the development of bilingual training modules for agriculture under the PESO program (PESO is an acronym for the Spanish rendering of occupational safety and health training, developed by OR-OSHA). Page 4

COMBINED INSPECTION DATA FY 2003 Table 1 SIC # Insp. # Prev Insp. Insp. w/ viol. WPS Violations Ser. OTS WPS penalties Violations non/wps Ser. OTS Non/WPS penalties # Repeat # Employee 0139 12 2 9 7 7 $465 1 14 0** 0 294 0172 6 1 5 4 2 $165 3 7 ** 0 29 0175 18 4 15 4 40 $705 5 33 $195 0 400 0191 10 2 8 8 12 $880 3 28 ** 1 187 0721 1 0 1 1 0 $100 0 0 0 0 0 0111 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 1 0161 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0171 4 3 3 2 9 $100 7 5 $600 0 71 0181 11 2 9 0 9 0 1 14 $105 0 522 0761 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 220 0783 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 5 $165 0 8 0811 2 1 2 2 1 $510 2 1 $100 0 130 0851 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 5191 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 TOTALS FY 2003 70 15 20% 57 28 85 $2925 23 118 $1165 1 1874 TOTALS 87-46 27 83 $2900 36 90 $2560 0 1879 FY 2002 **penalty was part of a grouped violation FY2003 TOTAL PESTICIDE RELATED VIOLATIONS = 254 SERIOUS - 20% TOTAL WPS VIOLATIONS = 113 SERIOUS - 20% FY 2002 TOTAL PESTICIDE RELATED VIOLATIONS = 236 SERIOUS 27% TOTAL WPS VIOLATIONS = 110 SERIOUS 25% Page 5

PESTICIDE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN SELECTED SICs Table 2 PARTIAL WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD INSPECTIONS (Workers Only) (Inspections conducted by Safety Compliance Officers - *Tier 1 and *Tier 2) SIC 0139 0172 0175 0191 0721 TOTALS # Inspections 1 0 1 2 0 4 # Employees 4 0 10 71 0 85 # with PRV* 1 0 1 0 0 2 * Pesticide related violations Table 3 COMPREHENSIVE PESTICIDE INSPECTIONS (Workers and Handlers) (Inspections conducted by Health Compliance Officers - *Tier 1 and *Tier 2) SIC 0139 0172 0175 0191 0721 TOTALS # Attempts 21 9 27 12 2 71 # Inspections 11 6 17 8 1 43 # Employees 290 29 390 116 1 826 # with Violations 8 5 15 8 1 37 COMBINED PESTICIDE INSPECTION TOTALS - Table 4 SIC 0139 0172 0175 0191 0721 TOTALS # Inspections 12 6 18 10 1 47 *Tier 1 *Tier 2 7 3 18 8 1 37 5 3 0 2 0 10 # Employees 294 29 400 187 1 911 # with Violations 9 5 16 8 1 39 % Inspections 75% 80% 90% 80% 100% 80% with Violations *Tier 1 Inspections: Pesticides used within the preceding 30 days plus the restricted entry interval *Tier 2 Inspections: Pesticides used greater than 30 days plus the restricted entry interval Page 6

PESTICIDE ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY IN NON-SELECTED SICs Table 5 PARTIAL WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD INSPECTIONS (Workers only) (Inspections conducted by Safety Compliance Officers - *Tier 1 and *Tier 2) SIC 0111 0161/0171 0181 0811/0851 0761/0783 5191 TOTALS # Inspections 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 # Employees 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 # with Pesticide Viol. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 6 COMPREHENSIVE PESTICIDE INSPECTIONS (Workers and Handlers) Inspections conducted by Health Compliance Officers - *Tier 1 and *Tier 2) SIC 0111 0161/0171 0181 0811/0851 0761/0783 5191 TOTALS # Attempts 1 4 13 3 2 2 25 # Inspections 1 4 11 3 2 1 22 # Employees 1 73 522 131 228 9 964 # with Violations 1 4 9 3 2 0 19 Table 7 COMBINED PESTICIDE INSPECTION TOTALS SIC 0111 0161/0171 0181 0811/0851 0761/0783 5191 TOTALS # Inspections 1 5 11 3 2 1 23 *Tier 1 1 5 7 2 2 1 18 *Tier 2 0 0 4 1 0 0 5 # Employees 1 80 522 131 228 9 971 # with Violations 1 4 9 3 2 0 19 % Inspections with Violations 100 % 80% 80% 100% 100% 0 80% *Tier 1 Inspections: Pesticides used within the preceding 30 days plus the restricted entry interval *Tier 2 Inspections: Pesticides used greater than 30 days plus the restricted entry interval Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10

Selected SICs - Table 8 FY2003 FY 2002 FY 2001 FY 2000 Number of Inspections 53 61 62 47 Number with PRV* 38 28 34 29 # of Different Employers 51 51 59 29 Employers in compliance 6 15 19 3 Handler related violations 80% 74% 56% 70% Worker related violations 20% 26% 44% 30% *Pesticide Related Violations Non-Selected SICs - Table 9 FY 2003 FY 2002 FY 2001 FY 2000 Number of Inspections 23 26 28 19 Number with PVR* 19 18 15 10 # of Different Employers 22 24 20 19 *Pesticide Related Violations Combined Inspection Results - Table 10 FY2003 FY 2002 FY2001 FY 2000 Total Inspections (all SICs) 70 87 90 66 Total WPS Violations 113 110 128 81 Total WPS Penalties $2925 $2900 $4910 $1710 Total Pesticide Related (non- WPS) Violation Total Pesticide Related (non-wps) Penalties 139 126 119 36 $1165 $2560 $2295 $285 Total # of employees covered 1874 1879 2241 2480 Page 11

Pesticide Related Interventions - Consultative Services Conferences 2003 Intermountain Agricultural Conference January 14-15, 2003 Willamette Valley Ag Expo November 18-20, 2003 Northwest Agriculture Show January 28-30, 2003 Farwest Nursery Show August 21-23, 2003 Consultations - By SIC 0139 0172 0175 0191 0721 Total 2 5 13 20 0 40 Page 12

PESTICIDE RELATED INTERVENTIONS - External Training Agriculture classes 401 - Worker Protection Standard, workshops and on-site training 203 - Personal Protective Equipment, workshops, on-site training, and Internet courses 205 - Hazard Communication Program, workshops, on-site training, and Internet courses 159 sessions Total in attendance 817 Health Compliance Officer Speaking Requests Linn Benton - Pesticide Safety OR-OSHA & OSU - WPS Medford Oregon Cranberry Farmer s Alliance - WPS Oregon Golf Course Superintendents Association # attending 30 18 75 120 Total in attendance 243 PESTICIDE RELATED INTERVENTIONS - RESOURCE CENTER Pesticide video loans 54 Safe Practices When Working Around Hazardous Agricultural Chemicals brochure 19,550 Washing pesticide contaminated clothing magnet (Spanish) 875 Division 4, Agriculture (also available on OR-OSHA CD with all industries, as well as on-line.) 100 Page 13

OR-OSHA Resource Center Pesticide-Related Videos 2003 Requests filled from Oct 1, 2002 to September 30, 2003 Item # Name English Spanish Times Req. 464 EPA WPS for Orchard Workers x x 5 465 EPA WPS for Pesticide Handlers x x 3 474 Oregon Pesticide Safety Guide x 2 475 Oregon Pesticide Safety Guide x 2 381 Chasing the Sun/Siguiendo El Sol x x 2 384 Greenhouse Pesticide Safety Training Workers & Handlers 352 How to Conduct Worker Protection Training/Train the Trainer 380 Pesticide Handlers and the Worker Protection Standard 383 Pesticide Handlers and the Worker Protection Standard 600 Pesticide Safety: Help Workers Protect Themselves 608 Pesticide Safety: Help Workers Protect Themselves x x 0 x 4 x 1 x 2 x 7 x 6 323 Pesticide Safety Worker Protection Oregon x x 6 392 Pesticide Training for Agricultural Employees x x 0 327 Shedding Some Light on Pesticide Protection x 6 332 Worker Protection Standard An Overview x 2 1051 Protecting Yourself From Pesticide Hazards new x x 6 Total Videos Requested 54 Page 14

Violation Summary per Year for 0139 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 CP DN HC Trng Rsp PPE Str FP EE LB 2000 2001 2002 2003 CP= Central Posting DN= Decontamination HC= Haza rd Communication; Trng= Training Rsp= Respirator; PPE=PPE; Str= Storage FP= Field Posting; EE= Early Entry; Lbl= label Page 15

Page 16

Page 17