Summary. Christopher C. Matson Weatherford Laboratories. Bruce MacPherson Rosetta Resources. Bruce Rowley Rosetta Resources



Similar documents
Unconventional Challenges: Integrated Analysis for Unconventional Resource Development Robert Gales VP Resource Development

Quick Look Determination of Oil-in-Place in Oil Shale Resource Plays*

Portable X-ray fluorescence Spectroscopy. Michael A. Wilson Research Soil Scientist USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, NE

Panorama & Isologica: Software for Data Delivery, Integration and Analysis. Bastian M. Schoell March 2015

X Ray Flourescence (XRF)

What are the controls for calcium carbonate distribution in marine sediments?

Coal Properties, Sampling & Ash Characteristics by Rod Hatt Coal Combustion, Inc. Versailles, KY

RESERVOIR GEOSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Oil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.

1.0 XRF Analyses Performance Evaluation

Investigating laboratory-generated pyrobitumen precursors for unconventional reservoir characterization: a geochemical & petrographic approach.

Topics: The Petroleum System. Origin of Petroleum. Arguments for biogenic origin. Google search : Origin of Petroleum : Hugoton Gas Field (Kansas)

METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF)

EDXRF of Used Automotive Catalytic Converters

Determination of Ultra Low Chlorine (and Sulfur) in Oil

Particle size effect on porosity and specific surface area measurements of shales

Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations

UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION DIRECTORATE FOR LABORATORY SCIENCES DIVISION OF CHEMISTRY 5 RESEARCH PLACE ROCKVILLE, MD 20850

BS PROGRAM IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (VERSION 2010) Course Descriptions

WELL LOGGING TECHNIQUES WELL LOGGING DEPARTMENT OIL INDIA LIMITED

Petroleum Generation & Accumulation and Geochemical Methods of Petroleum Exploration. Dr. V. Banerjie KDMIPE

PRE-CRETACEOUS HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE NORWEGIAN CENTRAL GRABEN. GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS Well NOCS 2/1-2

Reservoir Modelling and Interpretation with Lamé s Parameters: A Grand Banks Case Study

N O T E S. Environmental Forensics. Identification of Natural Gas Sources using Geochemical Forensic Tools. Dispute Scenarios

Eagle Ford Shale Exploration Regional Geology meets Geophysical Technology. Galen Treadgold Bruce Campbell Bill McLain

[]n. Craving energy. Oil and gas formation. Oil and gas formation. Resources: Fossil Fuels. Supplying our energy needs: Source of energy in the US

Exploration. Exploration methods

Lecture 35: Atmosphere in Furnaces

Chemical Equations & Stoichiometry

Chapter 4: Chemical and Solution Stoichiometry

March 21, 1972 Technical Service 8269CC (Addendum) Exploration Manager Amoco Europe, Incorporated Pall Mall London S.W.I, England.

Pressure Coring, A New Tool for Unconventional Oil & Gas Characterization. Matt Bjorum Global Product Line Manager

IB Chemistry. DP Chemistry Review

FROM SEDIMENT INTO SEDIMENTARY ROCK. Objectives. Sediments and Sedimentation

FlairFlex. Real-time fluid logging and analysis service

ROCK-EVAL 6 APPLICATIONS IN HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION, PRODUCTION AND IN SOIL CONTAMINATION STUDIES

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY STABLE ISOTOPES. SEPM Short Course No. 10. Dallas MICHAEL A. ARTHUR, Organizer THOMAS F. ANDERSON JAN VEIZER LYNTON S.

Argentina Tataru*, Marcel Adrian Piteiu*, Dan-Paul Stefanescu*, Ioana Vlasin*

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

EnerCom The Oil & Gas Conference. An Integrated Workflow for Unconventional Reservoirs

DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Graduate Program (Version 2002)

CHARACTERISATION OF SOME CLAYS USED FOR WHITEWARE CERAMICS I. MINERALOGICAL COMPOSITION

Sample preparation for X-ray fluorescence analysis

SALT SPRAY AND IMMERSION CORROSION TESTING OF PM STAINLESS STEEL MATERIALS. W. Brian James Hoeganaes Corporation. Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Well-logging Correlation Analysis and correlation of well logs in Rio Grande do Norte basin wells

Sedimentary Rocks, Depositional Environments and Stratigraphy

The Distillation Group, Inc.

All sediments have a source or provenance, a place or number of places of origin where they were produced.

Objectives. Describing Waterflooding. Infill Drilling. Reservoir Life Cycle

Physical & Chemical Properties. Properties

Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources:

UK Oil & Gas Investments PLC ( UKOG or the Company ) Nutech Assessment of UKOG Weald Basin Interests and Wider Weald, Onshore UK

INDEPENDENT REPORTS CONFIRM SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL FOR LINC ENERGY S SHALE OIL IN THE ARCKARINGA BASIN

Shale Field Development Workflow. Ron Dusterhoft

CHAPTER 7 THE DEHYDRATION AND SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS

Austin Peay State University Department of Chemistry CHEM Empirical Formula of a Compound

FRACTURING FLOWBACK: CONTROLS, ANALYSIS & BENEFITS

Geothermal. . To reduce the CO 2 emissions a lot of effort is put in the development of large scale application of sustainable energy.

Application for Monitoring and Analysis of real-time drilling data PFAS from ITC a.s

Introduction: Basic Well Completion Concepts

Mole Notes.notebook. October 29, 2014

IUCLID 5 COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS GUIDANCE DOCUMENT: IRON ORES, AGGLOMERATES [EINECS NUMBER , CAS NUMBER ] IRON ORE PELLETS

Introduction. The following is an outline of the contents of this paper: Definition of Artificial Lift Page 2. How an Oil Well is Produced Page 2

h e l p s y o u C O N T R O L

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

CHAPTER-3: EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Environmental risk managements of mine wastes (from planning to aftercare) Marja Liisa Räisänen ELY-centre for Kainuu

Mud logging, also known as hydrocarbon well logging, is the creation of a detailed record (well

41. GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF SAMPLES FROM HOLE 515B, VEMA CHANNEL, AND HOLE 516F, RIO GRANDE RISE

Specialist Reservoir Engineering

Specimen Paper. Chemistry 1F. Time allowed! 60 minutes

SANTE ET HYGIENE INDUSTRIELLE Health Industrial hygiene Filtres, Peinture, Amiante, Silice Filters, Paint, Asbestos, Silica

USE OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN THE LABORATORY

Characteristics of Sedimentary Rocks

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry

Molysulfide. Particle Size Analysis

DecisionSpace. Prestack Calibration and Analysis Software. DecisionSpace Geosciences DATA SHEET

Graphite Furnace AA, Page 1 DETERMINATION OF METALS IN FOOD SAMPLES BY GRAPHITE FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY (VERSION 1.

Operations in the Arctic areas? New challenges: Exploration Development Production

ASimple Guide to Oil Refining

LIMS REPORTS USER GUIDE

Excerpts for Rock Talk Vol 7 No.2 Colorado Geological Survey

Characterization of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Involved in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Operations

SEDIMENTARY ROCKS. Sedimentary rocks are formed near or at the surface of the earth.

RESERVOIR EVALUATION. The volume of hydrocarbons in a reservoir can be calculated:

Responding to New Discoveries: Workflow and Strategies for Conquering the Data Gap and Overcoming Stuck-In-Rut Thinking *

CH3 Stoichiometry. The violent chemical reaction of bromine and phosphorus. P.76

Sedimentary Rocks Practice Questions and Answers Revised September 2007

Pore Radius and Permeability Prediction from Sonic Velocity

Soil Suction. Total Suction

Drilling Problems. pull

Florinel ªuþoiu*, Argentina Tãtaru*, Bogdan Simescu* RIGLESS JOBS IN GAS WELLS

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

APPENDIX B: EXERCISES

Honors Chemistry: Unit 6 Test Stoichiometry PRACTICE TEST ANSWER KEY Page 1. A chemical equation. (C-4.4)

Petrophysical Well Log Analysis for Hydrocarbon exploration in parts of Assam Arakan Basin, India

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

The Basic Principles of Sieve Analysis

EARTH SCIENCE 110 INTRODUCTION to GEOLOGY MINERALS & ROCKS LABORATORY

Transcription:

Elemental (XRF), Mineralogical (XRD), and Organic Geochemical (programmed pyrolysis) Analyses Used to Determine the Contribution of Reservoir Quality to Differential Wellbore Production of Single-Pad, Multi-Lateral Wells in the Eagle Ford, South Texas, USA. Christopher C. Matson Weatherford Laboratories Bruce MacPherson Bruce Rowley Mark Jaeger Summary Differential initial production was recorded between four on-structure, single-pad horizontal wells targeting the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas, USA. Drill cuttings from two up-dip and two downdip laterals were captured on the next adjacent pad and analyzed using Energy Dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF), powdered X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and programmed pyrolysis analyses prior to completion. Results were used to evaluate reservoir quality before investigating completions strategy as the two major factors responsible for overall production. Although mineralogy and elemental signatures related to organic richness and paleodepositional environment were similar between up- and down-dip laterals, a few key organic geochemical parameters differed along dip. Although a subtle difference in thermal maturity assessed through pyrolytic Tmax values was noticed between up- and down-dip laterals, Hydrogen Index (HI) values and calculated Transformation Ratios remain very consistent among the wells. Additionally, estimated oil cracking does not yield significant differences among the wells. However, estimated secondary gas cracking does indicate that up to 65% more gas was produced in down-dip laterals and may have produced significantly more gas-drive to increase oil recovery in these laterals. The studied wells have now been completed using a similar completion strategy to the first where differential production was observed. Initial flow-back tests are scheduled soon and based on this GeoConvention 2015: New Horizons 1

analysis, a higher gas/oil ratio is expected from down-dip laterals. This difference maybe the result of increased gas-drive exhibited by down-dip laterals and should be more pronounced after initial production. Introduction Four single-pad 1,060m laterals were drilled targeting the roughly 2 southeasterly dipping Eagle Ford in South Texas, USA. Two wellbores, U1 and U2, are oriented up-dip and two wellbores, D1 and D2, are oriented down-dip perpendicular to strike. Oil and gas production from the down-dip wells are known to be 86% greater than the up-dip wells after 10 months online. The GOR is 93% greater in the down-dip wells over the up-dip wells. Wellbore surveys and traditional mud-logging suggested that all four wellbores maintained their position in the selected target reservoir. This difference in initial production was significant enough to warrant altering future drilling programs provided the greater production in the down-dip laterals could be anticipated and the nature of the greater production quantitatively ascertained. Both reservoir quality and completions design could be primarily responsible for the differential production. Wireline petrophysical logs could be cost prohibitive in the laterals while routine core analysis would require a modification to the drilling program and may not determine the nature of reservoir variability over the length of the laterals. Quantitative mineralogical, elemental, and organic geochemical analysis of cuttings brought to surface by drilling was chosen as a cost-effective measure to rapidly evaluate reservoir quality along the length of four laterals drilled on an adjacent pad with the same drilling and similar completions design. In this way, reservoir quality and wellbore positioning could be assessed prior to investigating and modifying the completions strategy or the drilling program. Method Drill bit cuttings were caught onsite at the flow line using sieves, recorded using lag depth, wet bagged, stored at ambient temperatures, and transported to laboratory facilities. Material sampled represented drilling cuttings, oil-based (diesel) drilling fluid, loss circulation material (LCM), and drilling fluid additives. Material was screened, hand-picked for non-rock components such as LCM, and washed in light soapy water. Contaminated drilling cuttings were then placed under vacuum and extracted using an ultrasonic bath and organic dichloromethane (DCM) solvent to remove oil introduced in the drilling fluid. Remaining cuttings materials are dried using a low vacuum. Thirty grams (30g) of dried cuttings material are split for analysis, with the remainder kept for archive. The analysis split is powdered and homogenized using a ball mill with tungsten-carbide vials and agitator balls. Powdered, homogenized material must pass 100 mesh sieve, with any coarse particles re-milled until all material passes. The resulting powdered, homogenized cuttings material is then directly analyzed by the Source Rock Analyzer (SRA), a proprietary Weatherford Laboratories programmed pyrolysis instrument. The SRA yields organic geochemical values of the cutting samples including free hydrocarbon content (S1), remaining hydrocarbon generation potential (S2), thermal maturity via Tmax, Total Organic Carbon (TOC), and a variety of meaningful parameters such as hydrogen index (HI), oxygen index (OI), and normalized oil content. For oil-based drilling fluid contaminated samples, the DCM extraction removes S1 below 1 mg/g and is thus not used for interpretive purposes. Blanks and standards are used to track instrument performance and calibrate the instrument due to changes in atmospheric or operating conditions. GeoConvention 2015: New Horizons 2

The same powdered, homogenized cuttings material is also directly measured by the Olympus Terra portable powdered X-ray diffraction (PXRD) instrument. The PXRD instrument uses a stationary 10W 30kV Cobalt tube and stationary 2D Peltier cooled CCD capable of a measuring between 5-55 2Θ. Ten (10) common mineral species and a total or bulk clay value were at a high enough weight percent to be quantified from the cuttings using a reference intensity ratio (RIR) method. Pure mineral compounds are used to routinely check instrument performance and calibration. Four grams of powdered, homogenized material is weighed out into aluminum cups and pressed over 10800 kg to form pellets. Sample pellets are then analyzed in the XEPOS HE Energy Dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) unit using a 50W end-window X-ray tube and a Peltier cooled Silicon Drift Detector to quantitatively measure 12 major elements including chlorine (Cl) and 20 trace elements. Internationally recognized Geochemical Reference Materials (GRMs) are used throughout the analysis process and represent matrix-matched material with published values. GRM values are used to track instrument performance and correct for element drift. After pyrolysis values are quality controlled, diffractograms are quantified for mineralogy, and elements are corrected for drift, all data is uploaded into Isologica for analysis and interpretation. Conclusions Analysis of the mineralogical character of the four lateral wellbores revealed the Eagle Ford target to be carbonate dominated, averaging 67 wt% calcite across all four wellbores and containing only 15 wt% average framework silicate grains (quartz + feldspars), 14 wt% total clay, and 4 wt% other minerals such as pyrite. Total Organic Content (TOC) is negatively correlated to calcite content (R 2 =-0.43), where clay was only weakly positively correlated to TOC (R 2 =0.24). Major element data stoichiometrically confirm the calcite-carbonate dominated lithology of the target but also reveal key relationships between TOC, paleoredox, and organic matter flux element proxies. TOC was found to have a statistically significant correlation to SO 3 (R 2 =0.92), V (R 2 =0.88), Cr (R 2 =0.81), Ni (R 2 =0.94), Cu (R 2 =0.94), As (R 2 =0.94), and Mo (R 2 =0.95) in all four wells. These elements tend to become enriched in marine settings where organic matter accumulation is fostered by reducing conditions within the pore space of bottom sediments due to restricted basinal conditions (Tribovillard et al. 2006 ). The presence of free hydrogen sulfide under reducing conditions (euxina) can further enrich these elements during depostion (Algeo and Rowe 2012; Algeo and Tribovillard 2009; Tribovillard et al. 2006).These paleoredox and organic richness proxies confirm that organic matter was reaching de-oxygenated bottom water conditions that favored their depostion and burial in these sediments. Wellbore position was also evaulated using survey and corresponding elemental data. Two wellbores revealed elemental indications of deviating from the target interval. Using silica-normalized Rb values, a 275 m stretch of lateral D1 and 50 m of U1 appears to deviate lower than the target. From the Author s previous elemental study of the Eagle Ford in the region, the Rb/Al 2 O 3 ratio tends to increase in the lower Eagle Ford and rise significantly in the Buda. All four wellbores contain significant concentrations of TOC in excess of the generally accepted 2 wt% needed for adequate unconventional reservoir production (Hunt, 1979). While S1 values are erroneous due to solvent extraction, Hydrogen and Oxygen Index (HI and OI, respectively) values were useful in determining kerogen quality. Tmax values converted to Ro values reveal that the reservoir section samples entered the late oil to early wet gas/condensate window for Type II kerogen (Barker, 1974; Espitalié, 1986). All four wellbores presented HI and OI values indicating original Type II kerogen (Espitalié, 1985) while build-section samples representing the overlying Austin Chalk produced GeoConvention 2015: New Horizons 3

significantly higher OI values. The relatively high OI values seen in some target Eagle Ford samples may have been the result of mixing with more oxidized organic matter (perhaps inertinite). Additionally, a greater contribution of evolved CO 2 to S3 during low temperature pyrolysis (<390 C) may have been due to mineral matrix interaction associated with the relatively high wt% calcite in these samples (Espitalié et al., 1977). Despite using sieves to screen cavings from cuttings, some finer up-hole material can be incorporated with the cuttings sample. The degree of up-hole cavings incorporation in the cuttings was evaluated using elemental data. Based on alumina and silica normalized values of K 2 O, Sr, and Rb compared to the summation of carbonate and siliciclastic elements, samples from three of the wellbores contain material that included some degree of contamination and were removed from the organic geochemical interpretation. While TOC values and kerogen Type are similar between all four wells, the down-dip laterals contain Tmax values that are 3.6-5.4 C higher on average than up-dip laterals after removing samples with significant suspected cavings contamination. If Tmax values were a reflection of a local geothermal gradient, this gradient should be reflected in HI values as well, however, HI remains relatively consistent across all four wellbores. Transformation Ratios based on present-day HI values are essentially the same for all four wells averaging 82.5%. This suggests that the difference in Tmax values observed between the up- and down-dip laterals did not result in differences in kerogen transformation. Tmax converted Ro values (sensu Teichmüller and Durand, 1983) were also used to estimate the percent of oil and gas cracking yield along each wellbore path. Estimated oil yields vary across the wells and reveal no consistent trend amongst up- (Ave U1=359 bbl/acre-ft, Ave U2=388 bbl/acre-ft) and downdip (Ave D1 = 383 bbl/acre-ft, Ave D2 = 373 bbl/acre-ft) laterals. Thus, estimated oil cracking does not yield greater oil generation in down-dip laterals. However, up-dip laterals seem to contain nearly 65% less secondary cracked gas than the down-up wells (126 Mcf/acre-ft average up-dip vs. 194 Mcf/acre-ft down-dip average). This significant difference in the estimated amount of cracked gas could be an important factor in the conveyance of oil and ultimately, oil recovery. Gas-drive is known as an important factor in Eagle Ford production and this differential in secondary cracked gas may be principally responsible for the greater oil production post completion. In this case, a 65% increase in secondary gas generation may have resulted in creating greater gasdrive potential and produced greater oil recovery. This hypothesis will be tested by measuring the gas/oil ratios in the up- and down-dip laterals during initial flow-back testing. Moreover, this difference in secondary gas generation may become more demonstrable over the long run after sustained production is measured. Acknowledgements The Authors are indebted to for their permission to publicize the values and interpretations in this presentation. We are also indebted to Dr. Tim Ruble with Weatherford Labortories for his assistance and guidence following the analysis of the wells. We would also like to acknowlege the time and efforts of the Weatherford Laboratories Wellsite Geoscience Services Team including Brian Hankins for their proof-reading efforts on our behalf. References Algeo, T.J. and Rowe, H. 2012. Paleoceanographic applications of trace-metal concentration data. Chemical Geology, v. 324-325, p. 6-18. GeoConvention 2015: New Horizons 4

Algeo, T.J. and Tribovillard, N. 2009. Environmental analysis of paleoceanographic systems based on molybdenum uranium covariation. Chemical Geology, v. 268, p. 211-225. Barker, C. 1974. Pyrolysis techniques for source-rock evaluation. American Association of Petroleum Bulletin, v. 58, p. 2349-2361. Espitalié, J., Madec, M., Tissot, B., and Leplat, P. 1977. Source Rock Characterization Method for Petroleum Exploration. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas. Paper number OTC 2935. Espitalié, J. 1986. Use of Tmax as a maturation index for different types of organic matter. Comparison with vitrinite reflectance. In: Thermal Modelling in Sedimentary Basins. J. Burrus (eds.), p. 475-496. Espitalié, J., Deroo, G., and Marquis, F. 1985. Rock-Eval pyrolysis and its applications (part one). Oil and Gas Science and Technology Revue de I Institut Français du Pétrole, v. 40, p. 563-579. Hunt, J. M. 1979. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology, 2 nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company. Teichmüller, M. and Durand, B. 1983. Fluorescence microscopical rank studies on liptinites and vitrinites in peat and coals, and comparison with results of the Rock-Eval pyrolysis. International Journal of Coal Geology, v. 2, p. 197-230. Tribovillard, N., Algeo, T.J., Lyons, T., and Riboulleau, A. 2006. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: An update. Chemical Geology, v. 232, p. 12-32. GeoConvention 2015: New Horizons 5