Diversity Outcomes for the Miami Plan Working Group Final Report. May 2007



Similar documents
WRITING INTENSIVE COURSES (definition, implementation, and resolution voted 1/23/2013)

WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)

NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY

ULM Common Core Curriculum: Final Draft (Revised 21 July 2004)

Programs/Elementary-Education-M-S

Department of Religion Carleton College Learning Goals and Outcomes

Undergraduate Student Electronic Portfolio Manual Department of Communication 230 Neff Hall 2101 E. Coliseum Fort Wayne, IN Revised 5/23/2011 1

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

M. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION

GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University

First-Year Seminar Proposal

COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES HONORS PROGRAM GUIDELINES APPROVED BY THE CAS HONORS COMMITTEE ON 11/25/2009

Research Scientist Ranks. School of Education. Criteria

Online Program Design. Not Met. Additional Evidence and Reforms Needed

M.A. Counseling Psychology Program Guidebook

M.S. in Criminal Justice Program Assessment Plan October 2007

Bloomsburg University Midterm and Final Competency Field Evaluation. Task Supervisor (if appropriate) :

Department of History Policy 1.1. Faculty Evaluation. Evaluation Procedures

Section 2: Program Summary Economics (CA): Secondary Major and Minor

Developing Research & Communication Skills

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Budget Proposal Narrative Division: CSE / Mathematics. Enhancement of First Year Math Instruction

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. List all of the program s learning outcomes: (regardless of whether or not they are being assessed this year)

I. Bylaws 2. II. Mission and Organization of the Department of Psychology 3. III. Administrative Structure of the Department of Psychology 5

ELA A Delicate Balance Spring 2009

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The roles and responsibilities expected of teachers at each classification level are specified in the Victorian Government

Social Work Program BSW Assessment

Ph.D. Counselor Education and Supervision Program Guidebook

Ph. D. Program in Education Specialization: Educational Leadership School of Education College of Human Sciences Iowa State University

Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

B.A. in Psychology Program Assessment Plan June 30, 2005

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Assessing MEdT Teacher Candidates Leadership and Collaboration Scott Robinson Masters of Education in Teaching*

BA Psychology ( )

APR comments on any/all of the six specific components of the self-study (if applicable)

Kean University School of General Studies General Education Mentor (GEM) Peer Leadership Program Undergraduate Student Employment Application

UGC Report on Modern Language and Linguistics and Intercultural Communications (MLLI) Program Review Prepared by Terrance Worchesky (Physics)

CATL Scholar Application Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning. Enhancing Academic Challenge in the Human Service Internship

Two-Year Progress Report of the Department of Psychology ( April 2015)

OUR MISSION. The mission of the USC Rossier School of Education is to improve learning in urban education locally, nationally and globally.

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

Northern Arizona University University Assessment Committee Annual Assessment Report Template

California State University, Stanislaus GENERAL EDUCATION: ASSESSMENT CHRONOLOGY

MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES

Annual Key Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Report Undergraduate Programs Metropolitan School of Professional Studies AY

GUIDE TO EVALUATING INSTITUTIONS

University Mission School Mission Department Mission Degree Program Mission

PRACTICUM OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING GOALS

Teacher Education Admission Interview

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK. Master of Social Work (MSW) Field Education Syllabus CORE YEAR

Council on Social Work Education. Curriculum Policy Statement for Baccalaureate Degree Programs in Social Work Education

Graduate Program Goals Statements School of Social Work College of Education and Human Development

MCH LEADERSHIP SKILLS SELF-ASSESSMENT

Master of Laws in Environmental and Land Use Law Academic Assessment Plan

Proposed UNTHSC School of Public Health. Faculty Bylaws. May 4, 2012

Graduate Handbook EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

Appointment, Evaluation, and Promotion of Instructors AddRan College of Liberal Arts

Upon completion of the First Year Navigation Competency, students will be able to: Understand the physical and virtual WCSU campus;

Bylaws of the Department of Agricultural Education and Communication University of Florida Approved October 7, 2009

Salt Lake Community College ASSOCIATE DEAN (AD) MODEL PROCEDURES

Office of thy Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs. DAC Revision Approval; Department of Psychology

University of Delaware College of Health Sciences Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition

Gonzaga University Virtual Campus Ignatian Pedagogical Approach Design Portfolio (IPA) Updated: October 15, 2014

Faculty Member Completing this Form: Melissa Cummings

Guide to Graduate Degree Programs

Discuss DIVERSITY AND PROFESSIONAL DISPOSITIONS 1 SECTION I CONTEXT

MASTER OF EDUCATION 1. MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE (M.ED.) (845)

Pennsylvania Core Competencies for Instructors Self Assessment Checklist

Program Personnel Standards Approval Form. Disciplrne: Nursing. ','J1* )lplll. RTP Committeehair Date i

Guide to Preparing Teaching Statements and Dossiers: For Graduate Students and Teaching Assistants

Deploying Professionally Qualified Faculty: An Interpretation of AACSB Standards An AACSB White Paper issued by:

leaders Master of Education Leadership in Reading UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS

All students are admitted during the summer and begin their coursework in the fall. Students must commit to completing these courses in sequence.

UCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for Plan Change or Plan Deletion

Guidelines for Conducting an APR Self-Study

Degree/Certificate Program Assessment Report College of Arts and Sciences The University of New Mexico. Part I: Cover Page

Department of Psychology College of Social and Behavioral Sciences Summary Report Of The Global Learning Initiatives Committee Spring 2011 Fall 2012

Creating an Objective-based Syllabus. Danielle Mihram, Director Center for Excellence in Teaching University of Southern California

APPOINTMENT TO AND PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration. Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track

Department of Social Work. Departmental Guidelines for Tenure, Promotion and Post- Tenure Review for AY

Santa Clara University. Guidelines for Academic Program Review

The Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership Assessment and Dissertation Handbook

SCHOOL OF NURSING Philosophy Statement

PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING FACULTY

1. Introduction Graduate School, Teaching and Learning Certificate. 1.1 Unit Mission Statement

Assessment Plan PhD in English & Comparative Literature, University of Cincinnati

MASTER S DEGREE IN EUROPEAN STUDIES

TOWSON UNIVERSITY College of Business and Economics Department of Accounting. ACCT 497 Internship

Program Modification/Proposal Create Quality Systems Undergraduate Certificate (QSUC)

Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

Policy Abstract. for the. Handbook for Program Review: Cleveland State University s Self-Study Process for Growth and Change Spring 2005

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

Recommended Course Sequence MAJOR LEADING TO PK-4. First Semester. Second Semester. Third Semester. Fourth Semester. 124 Credits

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

Faculty Evaluation and Performance Compensation System Version 3. Revised December 2004

Transcription:

Diversity Outcomes for the Miami Plan Working Group Final Report May 2007 Thanks to committee members Gerardo Brown-Manrique (ARC), Barb Heuberger Rose (EDT), John Jeep (GREAL), Susan Paulson (LAS), Ron Scott (COM), Michael Stevenson (Co-Chair, Provost Office), Jerry Stonewater (Co-Chair, Liberal Education), Desmond Sumuya (student), and Carl Halvorson (student) Introduction In October 2005 Provost Herbst appointed a faculty and student committee to examine ways in which the university s curriculum could more broadly address issues related to diversity. Specifically, the Provost charged the committee with two major responsibilities: to develop student learning outcomes for diversity such that assessment tools can be developed to measure students progress in accomplishing the outcomes; and to revise existing Miami Plan courses or develop new ones as appropriate to implement the student learning outcomes specified. The committee met regularly during the last year and one half and submits this report to the Provost, the University community, and to the University Liberal Education Council for further action. The following sections outline the major accomplishments of the committee and list specific recommendations for implementation of recommendations. Accomplishments and Implementation Recommendations A. Diversity Student Learning Outcomes were written for each of the Four Miami Plan Principles. Early in its deliberations the committee decided that the effort to develop specific student learning outcomes for diversity would be best accomplished in context of the four Miami Plan principles: critical thinking; understanding context; engaging with other learners; and reflecting and acting. This decision was made for several reasons. First, the focus of the Provost s charge was primarily, but not exclusively, on the Miami Plan; second, the four principles are a common language within the university and thus provided a vehicle for communication; and third, assessment tools have already been developed for several of these principles, thereby enabling the committee to capitalize on the work others have accomplished. The task of writing student learning outcomes for diversity consumed the majority of the committee s time and the process required many iterations and revisions. Care was taken to write 1

general, not specific, outcomes that were broad-based in scope. They are presented in this report as examples and suggestions for faculty use rather than as prescriptions that must be followed in course design. Indeed, faculty are encouraged to develop their own learning outcomes as they see fit. At the same time, the learning outcomes presented here provide the Liberal Education Council with liberal education outcomes that can be assessed from the programmatic rather than the individual course perspective. The diversity learning outcomes developed by the committee appear in Appendix 1. They are preceded with a preamble explaining how faculty might use them, then for each of the four Miami Plan principles, several diversity goals are presented. Then, for each goal, specific and measurable student learning outcomes are suggested. If you think about using this information on a webpage, you would click on a Miami Plan principle to see the general goals associated with it, then click on the goal of interest to see the associated student learning outcomes. Eventually, each outcome could be connected to example course assignments and/or assessment tools associated with it. The committee recommends that the Liberal Education Council accept these student learning outcomes, revise them as necessary, and adopt them officially. It further recommends that the final list accompany the Bulletin and Guidebook descriptions of the Miami Plan. Further, the Office of Liberal Education and Assessment should develop methods of assessing the learning outcomes at the programmatic level. The committee also suggests that, where appropriate, new course proposal forms and LEC review criteria use the diversity learning outcomes. B. Curriculum and course development strategies were developed by the committee. Two new curriculum development projects that will expand students intellectual and personal skills related to diversity were developed by the committee. The first of these, the Diversity-Based Interdisciplinary Capstone, provides release time for faculty to develop new diversity-based Capstones. The second, called the Liberal Education and Diversity Project, is more modest in scope and involves working teams of faculty involved in redesigning course assignments to strengthen and assess students diversity-related skills. Each is described in the following. Materials to disseminate to faculty are in Appendix 2. 2

Diversity-Based Interdisciplinary Capstone: These newly developed Miami Plan Capstones should focus on a particular diversity related issue or problem that requires an interdisciplinary team of students to "solve." It is expected that there are no prerequisites for such a Capstone, but that students bring their disciplinary knowledge and significant outside research to the class, and work collaboratively to address the issue at hand. Thus, the focus of the Capstone is that the students, as a team, are a task-force that goes about addressing the problem and producing some kind of final product that is appropriate for the issue at hand. The Liberal Education and Diversity Project: This project is modeled after the highly successful Assessing Critical Thinking Project developed by the Office of Liberal Education and Assessment. Faculty work in teams with a facilitator to develop or revise course assignments based on diversity learning outcomes, provide one another feedback on drafts of the assignments, and develop and use a method for assessing student accomplishment of the outcomes. At the end of the semester, participants submit to the Office of Liberal Education a short report of their work, including a list of the student learning outcomes developed, a copy of the assignment(s), and the assessment results. The committee also recommends that if these approaches are successful, consideration be given to implementing departmentally-based projects to infuse diversity outcomes into appropriate courses in the major. Similar to the Outcomes on the Major project model, departments would be asked to identify diversity outcomes appropriate for their majors (using the list we developed as a guide), examine the departmental curriculum to determine where the selected outcomes belong, then revise courses as needed. One other outcome of this committee should be mentioned. Michael Stevenson submitted a program about our work for the summer NASPA conference in St. Louis and it was accepted. 3

Appendix 1 Liberal Education Student Learning Outcomes for Diversity The attached information is designed to facilitate evaluation of Miami Plan Liberal Education student learning outcomes. Developed at the request of Provost Jeffrey Herbst by an ad-hoc team of faculty, administrators, and students, it aims to provide tools for assessing syllabi, readings, various student writing and oral assignments, tests, pedagogical approaches, and course evaluation instruments. The material is arranged around the four central Liberal Education principles: Critical Thinking, Understanding Contexts, Engaging with other Learners, and Reflecting and Acting. For each goal we have aligned general and more specific descriptors of measurable outcomes. We encourage both experienced and new faculty to use the overview to further their understanding of accepted means of describing course outcomes for enhancement of existing courses and/or for support in developing new Miami Plan classes. Liberal education student learning outcomes are ambitious in design, mutually supportive in execution, and can often only be attained over time. The data aims to identify assessable entities for consideration in evaluating course design, materials, and teaching and learning within and outside of the classroom. Web enhanced versions of this and other supporting material are being designed. Seminars, workshops, and other collaborative options provide concrete opportunities to engage with others who have expertise and interest in demonstrating what our students learn in our Miami Plan courses. 4

Miami Plan Principle 1 CRITICAL THINKING GOAL 1.1 The students should be able to apply complex thinking strategies to course concepts and theories related to diversity. GOAL 1.2 The student should be able to use high-level critical thinking skills to integrate academic understanding of diversity to personal experiences and situations. Miami Plan Principle 2 UNDERSTANDING CONTEXTS GOAL 2.1 The student should be able to articulate and analyze multiple perspectives on a variety of diversity issues in an **unbiased manner. GOAL 2.2 The student should demonstrate the ability to draw from multiple perspectives and contexts about issues under study and then develop reasoned conclusions about complex diversity issues. GOAL 2.3 The student should consider and analyze the potential impact of conclusions on many situations, including personal attitudes, beliefs and ideas. Miami Plan Principle 3 ENGAGING WITH OTHER LEARNERS GOAL 3.1 The student should help create environments that are safe for complex exploration of self, academic information, and others in the environment. GOAL 3.2 The student should demonstrate the ability to learn with and from a wide variety of others, including those that are very different from oneself. GOAL 3.3 The student should demonstrate the ability to explore difference in interpersonal interactions of all kinds and engage in cultural activities that are beyond one s personal experiences. Miami Plan Principle 4 REFLECTING AND ACTING GOAL 4.1 The student should articulate positions on diversity that are new to them and explain their relevance to the discipline and one s own personal belief structures. GOAL 4.2 The student should demonstrate the ability to act on personal beliefs that are informed by experience and academic study of the discipline. 5

Specific Student Learning Outcomes for CRITICAL THINKING GOAL 1.1 The students should be able to apply complex thinking strategies to course concepts and theories related to diversity. SLO 1.1.a Identify and explain in own words each diversity-related course concept and theory and assess relevance and implications of specific concepts and assumptions linked to them. SLO 1.1.c Analyze a given situation from the perspective of multiple theories, then integrate analysis into a new interpretation. SLO 1.1.d Relate an issue from the course to another course student has had and describe various strategies employed to a) describe the issue, and b) propose solutions. SLO 1.1.e Judge the appropriateness of various theories to explain situations. GOAL 1.2 The student should be able to use high-level critical thinking skills to integrate academic understanding of diversity with personal experiences and situations. SLO 1.2.a Describe why diversity-related concepts exist within the course and the personal meaning of each. SLO 1.2.c Articulate differences and similarities between one s own culture and other cultures (within the US and globally). SLO 1.2.d Describe how own values and beliefs can be both a benefit and barrier to diversity learning. SLO 1.2.e Develop a sociopolitical perspective (or perspective relevant to the course content) on identity development. 6

Specific Student Learning Outcomes for UNDERSTANDING CONTEXTS GOAL 2.1 The student should be able to articulate and analyze multiple perspectives on a variety of diversity issues in an **unbiased manner. SLO 2.1.a Given a diversity-related concept or theory, state different perspectives that may be different from your own. SLO 2.1.c Describe multiple diversities within individuals and groups. SLO 2.1.d State one s position on an issue, then convincingly argue for a different position. SLO 2.1.e Identifies main problem along with at least one issue or questions of diversity entailed therein; examines several diversity-related questions or issues and recognizes relationships among them. SLO 2.1.f Compares perspectives of different people or groups; compare different ways of analyzing or interpreting the material; discusses implications of competing perspectives. GOAL 2.2 The student should demonstrate the ability to draw from multiple perspectives and contexts about issues under study and then develop reasoned conclusions about complex diversity issues. SLO 2.2.a Identifies barriers to understanding multiple perspectives. SLO 2.2.b Recognizes contexts and biases from multiple diversity data sources, then synthesizes sources into themes and perspectives. SLO 2.2.c Recognizes the complex interaction of factors in diversity issues. SLO 2.2.d Analyzes a situation or problem from an unbiased view, states and supports one s own perspective, discusses other perspectives, then reaches an appropriate conclusion based on data, evidence and/or theory. SLO 2.2.e After examining various perspectives on a given situation, develops an appropriate integration of the perspectives into an appropriate conclusion. GOAL 2.3 The student should consider and analyze the potential impact of conclusions on many situations, including personal attitudes, beliefs and ideas. SLO 2.3.a Identifies conclusions/consequences of given perspectives or analyses on issue at hand; considers diversity-related information and context in identifying implications of arguments and issues. 7

Specific Student Learning Outcomes for ENGAGING WITH OTHER LEARNERS GOAL 3.1 The student should help create environments that are safe for complex exploration of self, academic information, and others in the environment. GOAL 3.2 The student should demonstrate the ability to learn with and from a wide variety of others, including those that are very different from oneself. SLO 3.2.a applies skills for solving problems in diverse groups, settings, contexts and ideas. SLO 3.2.b develops culturally appropriate interpersonal skills. SLO 3.2.c asks culturally competent questions. GOAL 3.3 The student should demonstrate the ability to explore difference in a variety of interpersonal interactions and engage in cultural activities that are beyond one s personal experiences. 8

Specific Student Learning Outcomes for REFLECTING AND ACTING GOAL 4.1 The student articulates positions on diversity that are new to them and explains their relevance to the discipline and one s own personal belief structures. SLO 4.1.a Develops an understanding of one s own cultural lens (self-reflection) by: o Demonstrating increased knowledge of one s own identity and culture, o Recognizing own biases, prejudices, stereotypes, and privileges. GOAL 4.2 The student should demonstrate the ability to act on personal beliefs that are informed by experience and academic study of the discipline. SLO 4.2.a Evaluates personal values and beliefs related to diversity and develops strategies for increasing diversity awareness and understanding. SLO 4.2.b Participates in activities and experiences that can enhance one s cultural competence. SLO 4.2.c describes how cultural competence can enhance interpersonal interaction, critical thinking, problem solving, and current US and world events. 9

Appendix 2 Curriculum Development Projects Materials MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: All Faculty Provost s committee on Diversity and the Curriculum: Gerardo Brown-Manrique (ACR), Barb Heuberger Rose (EDT), Carl Halvorson (student), John Jeep (Liberal Education and GREAL), Susan Paulson (LAS), Ron Scott (COM), Michael Stevenson (Co-Chair, Associate Provost), Desmond Sumiya (student) via Jerry K. Stonewater, Co-Chair University Director of Liberal Education and Assessment RE: Applications for Diversity and the Curriculum Projects I am pleased to announce two new curriculum development projects that will expand students intellectual and personal skills related to diversity. The first of these, the Diversity-Based Interdisciplinary Capstone, provides release time for faculty to develop new diversity-based Capstones. The second, called the Liberal Education and Diversity Project, is more modest in scope and involves working teams of faculty involved in redesigning course assignments to strengthen and assess students diversity-related skills. Attached to this memo are complete descriptions of the projects and an application form for each. Applications are due in the Office of Liberal Education by.. These two projects are based on the work of a committee appointed by Provost Herbst. He charged this faculty and student group to develop a set of student learning outcomes for diversity that are based on knowledge, skills, and intellectual capital expected of Miami students liberal education. He asked the committee to suggest outcomes that can be assessed and to develop means for revising existing Miami Plan courses or develop new ones to implement the student learning outcomes. The project is open to any tenured or tenure trace faculty member who regularly teaches a Miami Plan course. If you have any questions about the project, please call me (9-7135) or send an e-mail (stonewjk@muohio.edu). In advance, thank you for your interest. 10

The Liberal Education and Diversity Project Who may apply: All faculty teaching any Miami Plan course during Spring 2008 (Foundation, Thematic Sequence course, or Capstone). Up to 10 faculty members will be selected for participation in the project. Application deadline:...: apply to Jerry Stonewater, Office of Liberal Education (Application form attached). Expected outcomes of the project: 1. Project participants will participate in a 2-hour workshop on strategies for infusing diversity student learning outcomes into existing courses. 2. Two Teams of 5 selected faculty each will meet 4-5 times during the semester with a facilitator to assist one another to: Select student learning outcomes for diversity that can be infused into the Miami Plan courses taught by the Team members; revise at least one major course assignment for each course or develop a new one - to incorporate the selected learning outcomes into it; provide Team members with feedback on their revised or new course assignments; develop and use a method of assessing student accomplishment of the diversity outcomes for each course; based on the assessment results, plan revisions in the course/assignment to further improve student accomplishment of the outcome(s). 3. At the end of the semester, participants will submit a 1-2 page report of the results of their work to the Office of Liberal Education. The report will include a list of the student learning outcomes developed, a copy of the assignment(s), and the assessment results. Professional Spending Account: Each participant will receive a $300 professional spending account for completion of project activities. Questions? Contact Jerry Stonewater (9-7135; stonewjk@muohio.edu) 11

Application Form Liberal Education and Diversity Project Directions: Please complete this form and return to Jerry Stonewater, Office of Liberal Education. Deadline for applications is... Name: e-mail: phone: Department: What Miami Plan course are you teaching during Spring semester that will be the focus of your work on this project? Circle one: Foundation Course in a Thematic Sequence Capstone Briefly describe why you are interested in the project and what you hope to gain from it. Please note that by participating in this project, you are agreeing to attend the kick-off workshop on... Lunch will be provided. 12

Diversity-Based Interdisciplinary Capstone Description of the Diversity-Based Interdisciplinary Capstone: These newly developed Miami Plan Capstones should focus on a particular diversity related issue or problem that requires an interdisciplinary team of students to "solve." It is expected that there are no prerequisites for such a Capstone, but that students bring their disciplinary knowledge and significant outside research to the class, and work collaboratively to address the issue at hand. Thus, the focus of the Capstone is that the students, as a team, are a task-force that goes about addressing the problem and producing some kind of final product that is appropriate for the issue at hand. Who may apply: Tenured or tenure-track faculty may apply for release time for 3-credit hours of teaching. Departments will be reimbursed at the $800 per credit hour rate for a total of $2400. Up to three projects will be selected for funding. Application deadline:...: apply to Jerry Stonewater, Office of Liberal Education (Application form attached). Expected outcomes of the project: 1. The newly developed Capstone will specify diversity-related student learning outcomes for each of the four Miami Plan principles. 2. An assessment rubric (or other tool) will be developed and used to measure student accomplishment of the diversity learning outcomes specified (see 1). The assessment must analyze work produced by the students. A summary of these data will be made available to the Office of Liberal Education. 3. In addition to meeting LEC criteria for Capstone proposals, the Capstone course developed must also meet the following criteria: be interdisciplinary in nature; address a significant issue or problem related to diversity; have no prerequisites; be structured in such a way that students are using their disciplinary knowledge and significant outside research; be student-centered, inquiry oriented, and engage students in active learning in a way that they, not the instructor, conduct the course; require that students produce some kind of final product appropriate to the issue being addressed. 4. The Capstone should be offered at least once per year and a variety of faculty should be able to teach it. Liberal Education Council Approval: The Capstone is automatically approved by the Liberal Education Council if the proposal for this project is accepted. Undergraduate Courses and Curriculum Committee Approval: As a new course, you will have to get approval for the course via the university's curriculum approval process. Release time: Each participant will receive a 3-credit hour release time to develop the course. Questions? Contact Jerry Stonewater (9-7135; stonewjk@muohio.edu) 13

Application Form Diversity-Based Interdisciplinary Capstone Directions: Please complete this form and return to Jerry Stonewater, Office of Liberal Education. Deadline for applications is... Name: e-mail: phone: Department: Title of Proposed Capstone:, Abstract (no more than 100 words) for Bulletin and other Miami Plan publications: Please submit a five page (maximum) narrative describing the Capstone. If accepted for funding, your Capstone is automatically approved for the Miami Plan. Organize your proposal as follows: 1. Use this sheet as the cover for the proposal, with above information completed. 2. For each of the four Miami Plan principles, list the student learning outcomes for diversity that the course will address. These must be written in such a way that they are assessable. 3. Explain how the course addresses each of the following. Provide specific examples, not generalities: be interdisciplinary in nature; address a significant issue or problem related to diversity; have no prerequisites; be structured in such a way that students are using their disciplinary knowledge and significant outside research; be student-centered, inquiry oriented, and engage students in active learning in a way that they, not the instructor, conduct the course; require that students produce some kind of final product appropriate to the issue being addressed. 4. Provide additional information you feel is pertinent in order to clarify to the committee the various aspects of the course. 14