Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP



Similar documents
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

HUNTINGDON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

CITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION

St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

Setting Professional Goals*

ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP)

Informational Webinar for MDE Literacy Support Schools. Agenda

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION

Norfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System

Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

Maine DOE Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Model

TEACHER IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Participant Guidebook

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

I. THE PLAN. Init.10/10

Guide to the TEACHNJ Act. Purpose. Overview. Who is Impacted?

To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction

1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.

FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

NJ-L2L PROGRAM: STEP BY STEP

Recruiting, Selecting and Hiring TAP Leaders

Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors

At a Glance: Best Practices for Teacher Improvement Plans (TIP)

Supervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy

TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal

Florida Department of Education. Professional Development System Evaluation Protocol

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR

Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program

Model for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

EVIDENCE OF PRACTICE AND STUDENT LEARNING

Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary

Alternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Fact Sheet UPDATED January 2016

Standards for Professional Development

GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards

Coaching Expectations

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

TEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Reading Specialist. Practicum Handbook Addendum to be used in conjunction with the Education Unit Practicum Handbook

Certified Employee Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program Washoe County School District

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Rubric : WI School Psychologist

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Course outline. Code: EDU343 Title: Inclusive Practices and Intervention in Early Education

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

The information and application for completing the Coaching and Mentoring models application is available to you from several sources:

Principal Appraisal Overview

DISTRICT: Date Submitted to DOE: Contact Person s Name Title. Phone # E mail:

New Jersey School Counselor Association Evaluation Model. The Road to Highly Effective School Counselors

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

Portfolio Guidelines: Practicum Year Northeastern University's CAGS Program in School Psychology* Revised May 2014

08X540. School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473

DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Arlington Public Schools

Cobb Keys School Counselor Evaluation System Performance Rubric with Examples of School Counselor Evidence

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

ACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

How To Write A Curriculum Framework For The Paterson Public School District

STANDARD 1: THE TEACHER DEMONSTRATES APPLIED CONTENT KNOWLEDGE

Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

Evaluation of School Psychologists

Steps for ME1 New School Nurse

SCHOOL CITY OF MISHAWAKA TEACHER EVALUATION RUBRIC (SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS)

Transcription:

Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP This optional individual teacher PDP template is provided to assist teachers, educational services staff, and supervisors in fulfilling New Jersey s professional development requirements. Use of this template is not mandated by the New Jersey Department of Education. Educators may use or modify this template or create their own. The sample PDP that follows the description and template is for a fictional teacher and has been provided for illustrative purposes only. To download a clean copy of the template alone, please visit http://www.nj.gov/education/profdev/ipdp/teacherpdptemplate.doc. All active teachers, defined as staff whose positions require possession of the instructional or educational services certificates, are required to have an individual professional development plan, as specified in the TEACHNJ Act and N.J.A.C. 6A:9-15. Plans must be reviewed annually. If a teacher changes districts, a new PDP must be created within 30 days of the beginning of the new assignment. In addition, all active teachers must complete, at minimum, 20 professional development hours annually. However, a teacher s individual PDP goals may necessitate more than the minimum requirement of 20 hours. The 20-hour annual requirement may be pro-rated as necessary for teachers with less than a full-time assignment. Please note that any teacher who receives a summative evaluation rating of Ineffective or Partially Effective will be placed on a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). The CAP will take the place of this PDP until the next annual summative conference, and the activities in the CAP become the priorities for that teacher s professional learning and responsibilities while the CAP is in effect. A separate, optional template for the CAP is available atwww.nj.gov/education/profdev. For more information about the PDP and CAP and the optional CAP template, please visit the Department s AchieveNJ (http://www.nj.gov/education/achievenj/) and Professional Development (www.nj.gov/education/profdev) websites. In particular, please read the Overview of Teacher PDP and CAP Requirements document before using these resources. Creating the Individual Teacher PDP The teacher and supervisor should work together to develop the PDP using the New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers, New Jersey s Definition of Professional Development, and the New Jersey Standards for Professional Learning to identify strengths and challenges and related professional learning goals and activities, using multiple sources of evidence to inform the plan. The PDP should include identified areas for improvement and growth, specific professional learning activities to address these areas, timelines for completion, hours accrued, and reviews of progress. The PDP must specify, at a minimum: one area derived from the results of the teacher s most recent annual performance evaluation; one area aligned to the teacher s role as a member of a professional learning team, as appropriate; and one area aligned with school or district improvement goals, as appropriate. Professional learning activities such as grant writing, mentoring a pre-service or novice teacher, facilitating a collaborative team, professional service on boards or committees, teaching a course, making presentations, or developing curriculum should be considered as part of the PDP when these activities align to PDP goals. As part of the 20-hour requirement, teachers must also fulfill any requirements for professional development stipulated elsewhere in statute or regulation (e.g., training on suicide prevention and dyslexia). Instructions for using this optional PDP template are provided below. All tables may be expanded as necessary. New Jersey Department of Education 1 Updated August 2014

Step I. s Identified for Development of Professional Practice Identify in priority order areas for development and growth based on the teacher s most recent summative evaluation, work as part of a collaborative team, school/district priorities, and any other information/evidence examined to inform this plan. Consider opportunities for the teacher to grow professionally by using his/her strengths and/or by taking leadership roles, as appropriate. For each area, explain the rationale and related sources of evidence for its inclusion. Step II. Professional Learning Goals and Activities Determine specific professional learning goals to address the areas identified for development in Section I. There may be more than one learning goal identified per area; some learning goals may address multiple areas. Next, describe one or more professional learning activities to address each goal. For each learning activity, consider follow-up activities, as appropriate, that will help the teacher deepen learning and/or apply the learning to practice (e.g., additional coaching, working with collaborative team). Next, estimate the number of hours the teacher is expected to receive upon completing both the initial and follow-up activities. Finally, indicate the required completion date. Step III. District and School PDP Support In the box, summarize the supports the school district and principal will provide to enable the teacher to implement this plan (N.J.A.C. 6A:9C-3.4(i) and 6A:9C- 3.5(e)). Step IV. PDP Progress Summary Describe evidence of the teacher s progress on the PDP as discussed during a minimum of one annual conference between the teacher and supervisor. The supervisor and teacher together may also review the teacher s progress toward attainment of the PDP goals during the school year and revise the professional learning goals and/or activities if warranted by evidence of the teacher s progress or lack of progress. Append items of evidence to the PDP as necessary to document progress in addition to the information entered into this form. Interim Review of PDP Progress (optional) For each area identified for development of professional practice, determine and describe the teacher s interim progress, as well as any revisions made to the PDP. In addition, enter the sources of evidence that were reviewed and the date of each review. Summative Review of PDP Progress (required) For each area identified for development of professional practice, indicate if PDP expectations were met or not met as well as the sources of evidence that were reviewed. Finally, enter the summative review date. A new PDP will need to be created for the next annual planning cycle. New Jersey Department of Education 2 Updated August 2014

Optional Individual Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template District Name School Name Date Teacher Name Assignment/Department/Grade Level Rating & Date of Most Recent Summative Evaluation Supervisor Name Principal Name (if different) Plan Begin/End Dates I. s Identified for Development of Professional Practice s Identified for Development Rationale/Sources of Evidence 1 2 3 II. Professional Learning Goals and Activities 1 Professional Learning Goals Initial Activities Follow-up Activities (as appropriate) Estimated Hours Completion Date 2 3 New Jersey Department of Education 3 Updated August 2014

III. District and School PDP Support District/School Administrator Support Activities My signature below indicates that I have received a copy of this Professional Development Plan and that I understand and contributed to its contents. Teacher Signature: Supervisor Signature: Title: Date: New Jersey Department of Education 4 Updated August 2014

IV. PDP Progress Summary Interim Review of PDP Progress (optional) 1 2 3 Demonstrated Progress Sources of Evidence PDP Revisions (if applicable) Review Date My signature below indicates that I have reviewed the information recorded in the Interim Review of PDP Progress and that I understand its contents: Staff Member s Signature: Summative Review of PDP Progress (required) 1 Professional Learning Goals Expectations Met (Y) or Not Met (N) Sources of Evidence Summative Review Date 2 3 My signature below indicates that I have reviewed the information recorded in the Summative Review of PDP Progress and that I understand its contents: Staff Member s Signature: New Jersey Department of Education 5 Updated August 2014

Sample Individual Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Background (provided for context in this example): Ms. Stuart has been a teacher in the middle grades for 15 years and is tenured. She has been a member of a collaborative team of 8 th -grade teachers for 4 years. In the 2012-13 school year, nonfiction writing was designated a school-wide, cross-curricular priority. Ms. Stuart would like to take the lead in establishing professional learning goals for nonfiction writing for grade 8 students for herself and her team. Ms. Stuart is particularly interested in developing her leadership skills through collaborative professional learning teams. Ms. Stuart and her supervisor decided that she needs to complete at least 6 hours with her team working on improving instruction and assessments in nonfiction writing. She will be attending a 3-hour workshop on improving instruction and monitoring of student peer collaboration to promote active student engagement in learning, which is a school-wide goal. District Name School Name Date Achievement School District Achievement Middle School 6/7/14 Teacher Name Assignment/Department/Grade Level Rating & Date of Most Recent Summative Evaluation Martha Stuart Grade 8 / English Language Arts Effective 6/7/14 Supervisor Name Principal Name (if different) Plan Begin/End Dates Allyson Kuzinski N/A September 2014 June 2015 I. s Identified for Development of Professional Practice s Identified for Development Rationale/Sources of Evidence 1 Instruction and formative feedback in nonfiction writing Students produce only one piece of nonfiction writing per unit of instruction, each typically 1 page in length. Students need more teacher-directed skill-building in nonfiction writing instruction. Rubrics used to provide feedback to students do not provide specific enough guidance for rewriting. Classroom observations on 10/2/13, 12/11/13, 3/22/14 Review and discussion on 12/11/13 and 3/22/14 of lesson plans and artifacts provided by Ms. Stuart (i.e., writing rubrics, students writing samples with 2 Development of students collaboration skills in nonfiction writing teacher s Students with formative stronger feedback) collaboration skills tend to dominate peer interactions. Students with weaker collaboration skills are not developing as proactive learners. Classroom observations on 10/2/13, 12/11/13 Post-conference discussions: Ms. Stuart s description of approaches used when students work collaboratively New Jersey Department of Education 6 Updated August 2014

s Identified for Development Rationale/Sources of Evidence 3 Integrating technology into instruction During classroom observations, students spent too much time searching for digital resources and websites as they worked on assignments. Students lack the necessary skills to identify and evaluate appropriate digital resources to support learning. Students use of digital resources was not always focused on the learning objectives. Classroom observations on 10/2/13, 12/11/13, 3/22/14 Review on 12/11/13 and 3/22/14 of lesson plans and artifacts provided by Ms. Stuart (i.e., samples of students digital work products) II. Professional Learning Goals and Activities Professional Learning Goals Initial Activities Follow-up Activities (as appropriate) Estimated Hours Completion Date Differentiate learning objectives Set a common professional learning goal with cross-discipline colleagues in the grade 8 professional learning team, and work together to improve instruction and feedback in nonfiction Use team learning protocols to work on this goal. As a team, provide documentation to Ms. Kuzinski of progress made. As an individual, submit to Ms. Kuzinski 6 Ongoing Team: Biweekly submissions Individual: 1 and formative feedback in accordance with students learning writing and to ensure student learning objectives align with the sample lesson plans and classroom artifacts to document progress. Postobservation needs in nonfiction writing Common Core State Standards. submissions conference Invite district ELA supervisor to assist n/a 1 Oct. 2014 team members with lesson plans and improving feedback to students. 2 Improve strategies (e.g., use of rubrics) to sustain students focus on learning outcomes while they are engaged in peer collaboration Improve students peer Collaborate online with colleagues to Attend a 3-hour workshop on student collaboration skills in non-fiction refine learning acquired in the workshop peer collaboration in the classroom. 6 Nov. 2014 writing and fine-tune implementation of new Improve monitoring and strategies in the classroom. interventions with peer collaboration to ensure appropriate feedback New Jersey Department of Education 7 Updated August 2014

Professional Learning Goals Initial Activities Follow-up Activities (as appropriate) Estimated Hours Completion Date 3 Increase knowledge and awareness of digital resources that align with students learning objectives in non-fiction writing Work with learning team members to identify (1) digital resources that align with students learning objectives and (2) rubrics to evaluate those resources. N/A 2 Ongoing Develop abilities to teach students how to access, use, and evaluate digital resources to meet the learning objectives in non-fiction writing N/A 3 Dec. 2014 III. District and School PDP Support Attend an announced teacher-led district workshop on the integration of technology into instruction and management of learning activities using current technologies. Revise lesson plans to provide instruction on access, use, and evaluation of digital resources for non-fiction writing. Invite learning team colleagues to provide feedback and continue to refine lesson plans throughout school year. 2 Ongoing District/School Administrator Support Activities Your principal will ensure you have the necessary opportunities and resources to implement this PDP. At a minimum, Ms. Kuzinski will meet with you throughout the school year to discuss your progress through the classroom observation and post-observation conference process. You are encouraged to discuss your progress with Ms. Kuzinski at other times as needed throughout the year. My signature below indicates that I have received a copy of this Professional Development Plan and that I understand and contributed to its contents. Teacher Signature: Supervisor Signature: Title Date: New Jersey Department of Education 8 Updated August 2014

IV. PDP Progress Summary Interim Review of PDP Progress (optional) Demonstrated Progress Evidence PDP Revisions (if applicable) Review Date 1 Students are producing more nonfiction writing. There is more specificity in the writing rubrics and there is evidence that students are improving their writing as a result of using the revised rubrics. Interim progress in this area is good, but this area should continue to be a top priority for development. Classroom observations 10/20/14, 12/16/14 Review and discussion on 10/20/14 and 12/16/14 of lesson plans and artifacts provided by Ms. Stuart (e.g., writing rubrics, students writing samples with teacher s feedback, students writing grades over time) Expressed desire by Ms. Stuart to continue to lead the team focus in this area N/A 12/16/14 2 Students with weaker collaboration skills are still not developing as proactive, engaged learners. The more confident students continue to dominate conversations during peer collaboration sessions. 3 The team has created a list of high quality digital resources and evaluation rubrics. Lesson plans have been revised to include access to and evaluation of digital resources when students are working on assignments. Some, not all, student work products reflect appropriate integration of digital resources. Classroom observation 12/16/14 Post-observation conference: Ms. Stuart indicated that the methods she has tried have not been successful in enabling all students to collaborate effectively and expressed a need for more assistance and practice in this area. Classroom observations 10/20/14, 12/16/14 Review and discussion on 10/20/14 and 12/16/14 of lesson plans and artifacts provided by Ms. Stuart (e.g., samples of students digital work products, digital resource list, evaluation rubrics, teacher s self-assessment of her skill development) Visit and observe a colleague using 12/16/14 student peer collaboration and elicit ideas and instructional materials. Discuss methods that have proven successful. Closely monitor students to assess collaboration needs and adjust instruction to address these needs. As an option, make a video of your own class while they are using peer collaboration and provide written self-reflection on the class. N/A 12/16/14 My signature below indicates that I have reviewed the information recorded in the Interim Review of PDP Progress and that I understand its contents: Staff Member s Signature: New Jersey Department of Education 9 Updated August 2014

Summative Review of PDP Progress (required) Professional Learning Goals 1 Differentiate learning objectives and formative feedback in accordance with students learning needs in nonfiction writing 2 Improve strategies (e.g., use of rubrics) to sustain students focus on expected learning outcomes Improve students peer collaboration skills in non-fiction writing Improve monitoring and interventions while students are engaged in peer collaboration to ensure individual students receive appropriate feedback 3 Increase knowledge and awareness of digital resources that align with students learning objectives in non-fiction writing Develop abilities to teach students how to access, use, and evaluate digital resources to meet the learning objectives in non-fiction writing Expectations Sources of Evidence Met (Y) or Not Met (N) Y Observations 10/20/14, 12/16/14, 3/19/15 Review and discussion on 10/20/14, 12/16/14, and 3/19/15 of lesson plans and artifacts provided by Ms. Stuart (e.g., revised writing rubrics, students writing samples with teacher s feedback, students writing grades over time) Y Observations 12/16/14, 3/19/15 Summative conference: Ms. Stuart described changes in students behaviors which she attributes to new methods she is implementing in this area. Self-produced video of Ms. Stuart s instruction using student peer collaboration on Feb. 13, 2015, and her written selfreflection on the class Y Observations 10/20/14, 3/19/15 Review of lesson plans and artifacts provided by Ms. Stuart (e.g., lesson plans, samples of students digital work products, evaluation rubrics, self-assessment of skill development) Summative Review Date 6/12/15 My signature below indicates that I have reviewed the information recorded in the Summative Review of PDP Progress and that I understand its contents: Staff Member s Signature: New Jersey Department of Education 10 Updated August 2014