HUNTINGDON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
|
|
- Theodora Robbins
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 Board Approved HUNTINGDON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION MODEL COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mr. Fred Foster Mr. Sean Powers Mrs. Deborah Luffy Mr. Brian Pelka Mrs. Robin Whitsel Mr. Travis Martin Mr. Todd Quinter Mrs. Patricia Wargo Mrs. Jennifer Mitchell Mr. Nick Payne Mrs. Kim Rieffannacht Ms. Kammy Laird Dr. Kathy Suba Mrs. Mary Ann Buckley Mrs. Ashley Wallace PURPOSE 1. Maximize Teacher Performance for enhanced student learning- Be the best that you can be! 2. Provide assistance and support to facilitate professional growth. 3. Foster self-reflection of professional practices. 4. Ensure teacher accountability. 5. Build collegial relationships between/among teachers and administrators. 6. Provide a variety of choices to fit personal learning styles. 7. Build ownership of one s own learning. 8. Establish expectations of professional behavior and practices.
2 2 HUNTINGDON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT EVALUATION AND SUPERVISION OF TEACHER PERORMANCE Evaluation of teacher performance in the classroom is one aspect of the overall process of supervision. The primary goal of supervision is to provide assistance to professional employees in improving the quality of learning opportunities afforded within the context of the curriculum. Supervision is, therefore, a supportive act done for and with teachers, and ultimately for the benefit of students. Evaluation is a meaningful activity when it benefits teachers and learners. It is a continuous process and should be the best method by which to improve instruction. Consistent with this philosophy, the Huntingdon Area School Distinct believes an effective observations/evaluation program should provide the flexibility necessary for professional employees to improve instruction. To that end, employees are given the choice of the following programs: Formal Observation Model Self-Directed Action Research Model Collaborative Action Plan Model Portfolio Peer Observation/Coaching Model ( ) Professional employees deemed to be at risk will be assigned to an Intensive Assistance Program.
3 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Code of Professional Conduct... 4 Professional Growth and Evaluation Decision Flowchart... 5 Formal Observation Model... 6 Self-Directed Research Action Plan... 8 Collaborative Action Plan Portfolio Peer Observation/Coaching Framework Rubrics... 50
4 4 PENNSYLVANIA S CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR EDUCATORS Professional practices are behavior and attitudes that are based on a set of values that the professional education community believes and accepts. These values are evidenced by the professional educator s conduct toward students and colleagues and the educator s employer and community. Professional educators are expected to abide by the following: Abide by the Public School Code and other school laws of the Commonwealth. Be prepared, and legally certified in their areas of assignment, educators may be assigned to or accept assignments outside their certification area on a temporary, short-term, emergency basis. Maintain high levels of competence throughout their careers. Exhibit consistent and equitable treatment of students, fellow educators and parents. They shall respect the civil rights of all and not discriminate. Accept the value of diversity in educational practice. Diversity requires educators to have a range of methodologies and to request the necessary tools for effective teaching and learning. Impart to their students principles of good citizenship and societal responsibility. Exhibit acceptable and professional language and communication skills (verbal and written to students, parents and staff). Be open-minded, knowledgeable and use appropriate judgment and communication skills when responding to an issue within the educational environment. Keep in confidence information obtained in confidence in the course of professional service unless required to be disclosed by law or by clear and compelling professional necessity as determined by the professional educator. Exert reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions which interfere with learning or are harmful to the student s health and safety.
5 5
6 6 Formal Observation Model This process is designed to provide feedback and suggestions for instructional improvement through a cooperative effort between the administrator and professional. An added factor for individuals in Formal Observation is to develop and work toward reaching professional goal(s) for the year. Formal Observation- Administrators will visit one class period in length for the observation. Procedures (aligned to Danielson Framework) A. Pre-Observation Employee will submit lesson plan in advance of planning meeting. Employee will complete PAETEP. Observer will hold meeting to review lesson plan and add to documentation needed for observation (Domain 1). Meeting will be held no more than five (5) school days before observation. B. Observation (Domain 2 and 3) Observer will arrive 5 minutes prior to lesson to collect evidence from classroom walls, bulletin boards, etc. Observer will take written notes (paper or computer) to collect evidence during the formal observation. The written plan for the lesson and the teacher s grade book (paper copy or electronic access) will be available to the administrator during his/her observation. Observer will provide evidence through PAETEP. C. Preparing for Post-Conference Employee will have the opportunity to add evidence to the observation form that may have been overlooked by Observer through PAETEP. Employee completes will complete Domain 4 and the self-assessment rubric on PAETEP prior to the post-observation conference. D. Post- Observation Conference Employee will meet with Observer to reflect on lesson. Observer and Employee will review evidence and provide opportunity for the employee to discuss other components Components will be collaboratively rated, however Observer will be the rater of record in the event of non-agreement. Evidence will be the basis for rating. A reasonable effort will be made to have this meeting within five (5) school days following the observation. Observer and Employee will authenticate the observation using PAETEP.
7 7 E. Additional Evidence and Observation Follow-up Observer will complete walk-throughs after the observation to collect additional evidence or to follow-up on identified component areas of growth in the teacher s practice. Guidelines 1. Non-tenured employees (minimum of two formal observation and four walk throughs). 2. Staff members who volunteer (minimum of one observation and two walk throughs). 3. Staff members new to the district for a minimum of one year (minimum of one observation and two walk throughs). 4. Staff members will be assigned to Formal Observation once every 3 years (minimum of one observation and two walk throughs). Staff members are encouraged to engage in other Supervision Tracks in other years
8 8 Self-Directed Action Research Model Self-Directed is a model which provides a process for a staff member to select an area of instruction to explore in depth and/or pursue new ideas in order to achieve professional growth and enhance student achievement. Participants Description Guidelines for Self-Directed Action Plan Tenured staff members with performance rating indicating satisfactory on their final rating in HASD, with administrative approval. In an effort to refine teaching/job skills to promote professional growth and to enhance student learning, the professional will select an area to explore in depth and/or a new idea/interest to pursue. The professional will develop a goal for the year, develop objectives and strategies to achieve that goal, define assessments to evaluate success and periodically reflect upon the process. Observation Procedures: No formal observation is required by an administrator/ supervisor, but may occur at administrative discretion. A minimum of 2 walk-though observations/conferences will be conducted. Professional will be rated by administrators on all 4 Domains of Danielson Model: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, and Professional Responsibility. Frequency: Initial review of plan and goals with administrator during the month of September. Quarterly reflection logs discussing progress toward goal should be turned in at the end of each quarter and will be discussed with assigned administrator during Midpoint and Final Reviews.
9 9 Forms to be used: Initial Application Form Reflection Logs Midpoint Review Form Final Review Form Final Reflection Form Framework Rubric for each Domain Examples of research projects/ topics for a self-directed plan are the following: Questioning techniques Using data to guide instruction Extending/refining activities for units Using/developing graphic organizers Cooperative learning activities Flexible grouping Enhancing parent-teacher communication through websites Incorporating reading strategies into core instruction (i.e. science, social studies, etc.) Researching and embedding new technology into lessons
10 10 SELF-DIRECTED ACTION PLAN APPLICATION Date Received: OFFICE USE ONLY Name: Position: Title of Project: Name of School: Supervisor: Position: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains (List one component within each of the 4 Domains to be researched in this study: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Professional Responsibility): Goal(s) statement, including statement of need or purpose of the project: Objectives, strategies, resources and/or activities to achieve the goal(s) (as related or outlined in Danielson Model): Research review used in formation of this action plan (include bibliography): Timeline for the action plan:
11 11 Define assessments to evaluate success (evidence of completion, journals, portfolio, etc.): Data collection (list instrument/tool to be used, data to be collected, how to be analyzed): Plan to share with others (include possible participants, method and timeframe to complete): Additional information (if needed): Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
12 12 Self-Directed Action Plan QUARTERLY REFLECTION LOG This form is to be completed at the end of each marking period by the participant. The reflection logs and meeting notes will serve as the basis of discussions for Mid Point and Final meetings with the building administrator. Reflection on goals: Data collection, analysis of data, findings, and recommendations (thus far): Administrator comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
13 13 Self-Directed Action Plan Mid-Year Review Teacher: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: Comment/reflections/revisions (data analysis and findings): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment:
14 14 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility: Administrator comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
15 15 Self-Directed Action Plan Model Final Review Professional Member: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: Final synopsis (reflections on data analysis and work completed): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment:
16 16 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
17 17 Final Reflection Form This form should be submitted at the conclusion of the school year, along with the evidence of work completed. The information below is a summary/reflection of how I, believe the action research helped me to grow professionally this year (include any impact on student achievement). Goal(s): Reflection on student achievement: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
18 18 Collaborative Action Plan Model The Collaborative Model process provides an opportunity for staff members to work together toward professional growth. A team of professional staff members may work on a collaborative project or common goal. Staff members will choose instructional colleagues from within the district for their team with administrative approval. Participants Description Guidelines for Collaborative Action Plan Tenured staff members with performance rating indicating satisfactory on their final rating in HASD, with administrative approval. Team size of 2 to 4 participants will be determined by the focus of the study and needs of the group. Teams over 4 members will need additional justification for approval. In an effort to refine teaching/job skills and promote professional growth of all participants and to enhance student learning, the collaborative team of professionals will select an area or idea to explore in depth. The team will develop a goal(s) for the year, develop objectives and strategies to achieve that goal, define assessments to evaluate success, and periodically reflect upon the process. Meeting Procedures: 1. A minimum of 10 collaborative meetings throughout the school year must be attended by all participants in this model. These meetings will include the initial meeting to set the collaborative plan, Midpoint review and Final Review. 2. Participants may participate in additional activities if desired. Frequency Initial review of plan and goals with administrator during the month of September. Running record of attendance of each meeting along with a brief summary of discussion items and progress toward goal. Midpoint and Final report and review with administrator.
19 19 Observation Procedures: No formal observation is required by an administrator/ supervisor, but may occur at administrative discretion. A minimum of 2 walk-though observations/conferences will be conducted. Professional will be rated by administrators on all 4 Domains of Danielson Model: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, and Professional Responsibility. Forms to be used: Project Application Form Record of Meetings Midpoint Review Form End of Year Review Form Framework Rubric for each Domain. Suggested ideas/projects/topics for a Collaborative Plan are the following: 1. Prepare a workshop for district staff development on an instructional approach, a specific educational topic, or a topic integral to maximizing student potential. 2. Develop a different teaching or department strategy to address a need. 3. Develop lesson units that address various instructional learning approaches. 4. Develop motivational techniques. 5. Observe classes in a curriculum area that precede and/or follow what you teach. 6. Research a particular topic area and try new strategies with students; i.e. classroom management, computer assisted instruction, common assessments, higher order thinking and questioning skills, etc. 7. Develop common alternative assessments and analyze data. 8. Work with other professionals, community members, college professors, or administrators on an educational initiative. 9. Research new technologies and methods to incorporate into classroom instruction.
20 20 Collaborative Action Plan Model Project Application Title of Project: Names of team members, positions and buildings: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: (List one component within each of the 4 Domains researched in this study: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Professional Responsibility): Statement of goal(s) of the project (include benefits to students): Action plan to achieve purpose (include activities, timeline, resources and methods of assessing success of initiative/practice): Research review used in formation of this action plan (include bibliography): Documentation: (evidence of completion, journals, portfolio, etc.): Tentative dates and times of collaborative team meetings (minimum 1 meeting per marking period): Common Meeting Time:
21 21 Collaborative Plan: Project Application (continued) OR Date Time Location Plan for sharing of information with others (include possible participants, method and timeframe to complete): Teachers Signatures of Intent to Participate: Signature of Administrator Approval:
22 22 Team Members in attendance: Collaborative Action Plan Model Record of Team Meetings Date: Member Signature: Member Signature: Member Signature: Member Signature: Team Members absent: Topics discussed (on goal): Data collection, analysis of data, findings and recommendations (thus far): Summarize any decisions made: Next steps: Actions to be taken: Meeting Facilitator: Secretary: Submit a copy to Building Administrator no later than 2 school days after each meeting.
23 23 Collaborative Action Plan Model Mid-Year Review Team: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: Comment/reflections/revisions (data analysis and findings): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning (List where appropriate) 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment: 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility: Administrator comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher Signature: Date: Teacher Signature: Date: Teacher Signature: Date: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
24 24 Collaborative Action Plan Model Final Review Team: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: End of Year Synopsis (reflections on data analysis and work completed): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning (list where appropriate) 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment: 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Teacher Signature: Date: Teacher Signature: Date: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
25 25 Final Reflection Form This form should be submitted at the conclusion of the school year, along with the evidence of work completed. The information below is a summary/reflection of how I, believe the action research helped me to grow professionally this year (include any impact on student achievement). Goal(s): Reflection on student achievement: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
26 26 Portfolio Description: A portfolio provides the opportunity for professionals to examine their own practice, in relation to the Danielson Framework by collecting evidence and artifacts demonstrating personal growth. Participants Description Guidelines for Portfolio Tenured staff members with performance rating indicating satisfactory on their final rating in HASD, with administrative approval. Each professional will be responsible for selecting a component from each of the four domains aligned to the Danielson Framework for Teaching and collecting evidence for all elements within that component. Professionals will be advised to develop a plan to collect evidence for the elements in the domains. Observation Procedures: No formal observation is required by an administrator/ supervisor, but may occur at administrative discretion. A minimum of 2 walk-though observations/conferences will be conducted. Professional will be rated by administrators on all 4 Domains of Danielson Model: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, and Professional Responsibility. Frequency: Initial review of plan and goals with administrator during the month of September. Quarterly reflection logs discussing progress toward goal should be turned in at the end of each quarter and will be discussed with assigned administrator during Midpoint and Final Reviews.
27 27 Forms to be used: Initial Application Form Reflection Logs Midpoint Review Form Final Review Form Final Reflection Form Framework Rubric for each Domain. Portfolio Evidence Collection Record
28 28 Date Received: OFFICE USE ONLY PORTFOLIO APPLICATION Name: Position: Title of Project: Name of School: Supervisor: Position: Domain 1 Planning & Preparation Component: Plan for collecting evidence: Domain 2 The Classroom Environment Component: Plan for collecting evidence: Domain 3 Instruction Component:
29 29 Plan for collecting evidence: Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities Component: Plan for collecting evidence: Additional information (if needed): Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
30 30 Portfolio QUARTERLY REFLECTION LOG This form is to be completed at the end of each marking period by the participant. The reflection logs and meeting notes will serve as the basis of discussions for Mid Point and Final meetings with the building administrator. Reflection on goals: Data collection, analysis of data, findings, and recommendations (thus far): Administrator comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
31 31 Portfolio Mid-Year Review Teacher: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: Comment/reflections/revisions (data analysis and findings): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment:
32 32 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility: Administrator comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
33 33 Portfolio Final Review Professional Member: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: End of year synopsis (reflections on data analysis and work completed): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment:
34 34 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
35 35 Final Reflection Form This form should be submitted at the conclusion of the school year, along with the evidence of work completed. The information below is a summary/reflection of how I, believe the action research helped me to grow professionally this year (include any impact on student achievement). Goal(s): Reflection on student achievement: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
36 36 Portfolio Evidence Collection Record Domain 1- Planning & Preparation Components: End of 1 st Quarter Evidence End of 2 nd Quarter Evidence Final Review Evidence Supervisor s comments Component:
37 37 Portfolio Evidence Collection Record Domain 2- The Classroom Environment Components: End of 1 st Quarter Evidence End of 2 nd Quarter Evidence Final Review Evidence Supervisor s comments Component:
38 38 Portfolio Evidence Collection Record Domain 3- Instruction Components: End of 1 st Quarter Evidence End of 2 nd Quarter Evidence Final Review Evidence Supervisor s comments Component:
39 39 Portfolio Evidence Collection Record Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities Components: End of 1 st Quarter Evidence End of 2 nd Quarter Evidence Final Review Evidence Supervisor s comments Component: 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter End of Year Supervisor s Signature Supervisor s Signature Supervisor s Signature Teacher s Signature Teacher s Signature Teacher s Signature Conference Date Conference Date Conference Date
40 40 * Available School Year Peer Observation/Coaching Model Peer Observation and Coaching is a model which provides an opportunity for two or three professional staff members to observe and learn from one another in the implementation of their instructional practices within the classroom environment. Examples of targeted instructional practices: classroom management, extending and refining lessons, higher order questioning techniques, assessment techniques, unit planning and delivery, etc. Participant: Guidelines for Peer Observation/Coaching Model Tenured Staff members with performance rating indicating satisfactory on their final rating in HASD with administrative approval. Must attend training prior to participating in this model. Description: The Peer Observation/Coaching Model consists of: One to One Coaching and Observation-Participants will model and observe instructional techniques in the classroom setting with one another. The principal, as a facilitator, will provide the necessary tools or direction necessary to reach the pair s goals. There are two types of peer observation models: 1. Two professionals with similar instructional goals, or 2. Peer Observation/Coach Model where two professional provides mentoring for each other. Observation Procedures: No formal observation is required by an administrator/ supervisor, but may occur at administrative discretion. A minimum of 2 walk-though observations/conferences will be conducted. Professional will be rated by administrators on all 4 Domains of Danielson Model: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, and Professional Responsibility. Observations and reflections of peer mentors will be accomplished by each member participating in this model. If two people are involved, each must do a minimum of three observations of the other.
41 41 Frequency: Initial review of plan and goals with administrator during the month of September. Running record of attendance of each meeting along with a brief summary of discussion items and progress toward goal. Midpoint and Final report and review with administrator. Forms to be used: Goals: Initial Application Form Reflection Logs Midpoint Review Form Final Review Form Final Reflection Form Framework Rubric for each Domain. Need to be developed prior to gaining administrative approval. Indicators for attainment of goals need to be established for monitoring progress. If necessary, rationale for not attaining goals needs to be explained in Midpoint and End of Year reports. Reflection logs and meeting notes need to be maintained by each of the participants.
42 42 Date Received: OFFICE USE ONLY PEER OBSERVATION/COACHING PROJECT APPLICATION Title of Project: Names of Team Members, Positions and Buildings: Supervisor: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains (List one component within each of the 4 Domains to be researched in this study: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Professional Responsibility): Goal(s) statement, including statement of need or purpose for the Peer Observation/Coaching: Action plan (objectives, strategies, activities, resources etc.) to achieve the goal(s) (as related or outlined in Danielson Model): Research review used in formation of this action plan (include bibliography): Timeline for the action plan:
43 Data collection (list instrument/tool to be used to assess, data to be collected, how to be analyzed): 43 Plan to share with others (include possible participants, method and timeframe to complete): Additional information (if needed): Teacher Signature: Date Submitted: Administrator Signature: Date Submitted:
44 44 Peer Observation/Coaching REFLECTION LOG This form is to be completed after each observation by the participants. The reflection logs and meeting noted will serve as the basis of discussions for mid-point and final meetings with the building administrator. Reflection on goals: Data collection, analysis of data, findings and recommendations: Administrator comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher s Signature: Date: Mentor s Signature: Date: Administrator s Signature: Date:
45 45 Each teacher completes this form. Peer Observation/Coaching Mid-Year Review Teacher: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: Comment/reflections/revisions (data analysis and findings): Discussion summary: Connections to Danielson Framework Domains: Evidence of Learning 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment: 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility:
46 46 Administrative comments and/or necessary assistance: Teacher s Signature: Date: Peer s Signature: Date: Administrator s Signature: Date:
47 47 Peer Observation/Coaching Model Final Review Professional Member: Goal(s): Evidence of meeting goals: Comment/reflections/revisions (data analysis and findings): Final synopsis (reflections on work completed): Connections to Danielson Framework Domain: Evidence of Learning 1. Planning and Preparation: 2. Classroom Environment: 3. Instruction: 4. Professional Responsibility:
48 48 Administrative comments: (Attach Final Reflection Form prior to submission.) Teacher s Signature: Date: Mentor s Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
49 49 Final Reflection Form This form should be submitted at the conclusion of the school year, along with the evidence or work completed. The information below is a summary/reflection of how I,, believe the action research helped me to grow professionally this year (include any impact on student achievement). Goal(s): Reflection: Administrator comments: Teacher Signature: Date: Administrator Signature: Date:
I. THE PLAN. Init.10/10
I. THE PLAN Professional employees will be grouped into four categories, or STAGES. Teacher evaluation occurs through a variety of activities: (1) required supervisory activities, (2) personalized supervisory
More informationOptional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP
Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP This optional individual teacher PDP template is provided to assist teachers, educational services staff, and supervisors in
More informationSample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*
Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1* This form must be used for each performance appraisal. The duties of the principal may be delegated to a vice-principal in the same school,
More informationSt. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents
St. Charles School District Growth Guide and Evaluation Documents 2014-2015 City of St. Charles School District MISSION The City of St. Charles School District will REACH, TEACH, and EMPOWER all students
More informationWisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Teacher Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
More informationROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP)
ROCORI SCHOOLS ISD 750 ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP) To be central Minnesota s public education standard of excellence A joint agreement between Education Minnesota-ROCORI and ISD
More informationGreenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool
Greenville City Schools Teacher Evaluation Tool Table of Contents Introduction to Teacher Evaluation 2 Glossary 3 Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities 5 Teacher Evaluation Rubric 6 Self-Assessment 11
More informationStronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System Overview Teacher Effectiveness Student Achievement Student Achievement Stronge Evaluation System Effectiveness is the goal. Evaluation is merely
More informationModel for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional
More informationProfessional School Counselor Effectiveness Rubric 2011
Professional School Counselor Effectiveness Rubric 2011 I. Overview II. Effectiveness Rubric a. Domain 1: Academic Achievement b. Domain 2: Student Assistance Services c. Domain 3: Career Development d.
More informationParticipant Guidebook
Participant Guidebook Module 1 Understand Teacher Practice Growth through Learning s Module 1 Understand Teacher Practice Guidebook 1 Participant Guidebook Overview Based upon successful completion of
More informationSelf-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 1.1 The system engages in a systematic, inclusive, and comprehensive process to review, revise, and communicate a system-wide propose for the student success. The system
More informationCoaching Expectations
Coaching Expectations School- based coaches are selected by the principal and must have the necessary skills and qualifications as stated in the District s new job descriptions (Literacy, Science, Mathematics).
More informationRubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators Standard 1: Instructional Technology Facilitators demonstrate leadership. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished
More informationCyber School Student Teaching Competencies
Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies Introduction The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) has developed a general set of student teaching competencies that afford a student teacher the opportunity
More informationUSD 360 Teacher Self-Evaluation
USD 360 Teacher Self-Evaluation Name of Person Evaluated Teacher s Signature Date Principal s Signature Date Performance Area I: The teacher oversees safe and orderly classrooms. Indicator 1: Creates a
More informationProfessional School Counselor Effectiveness Rubric 2012
Professional School Counselor Effectiveness Rubric 2012 I. Overview II. Effectiveness Rubric a. Domain 1: Academic Achievement b. Domain 2: Student Assistance Services c. Domain 3: Career Development d.
More informationTeacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
More informationPerformance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
More informationTeacher Performance Evaluation System
Alexandria Township Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Revised: 09/21/2011) Table of Contents Part I: Introduction and Process Introduction...5 Purposes...5 Identifying Teacher Performance
More informationInternship Manual Educational Specialist (EdS) Florida Gulf Coast University
Internship Manual Educational Specialist (EdS) Florida Gulf Coast University 2 Table of Contents The College of Education Vision... 3 The College of Education Mission... 3 Purpose of the Internship...
More informationModel for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation
Model for Instructional Improvement Teacher Evaluation Implemented 2008-09 Revised August 15, 2011 Table of Contents Vision and Mission Statements... 2 Teacher Evaluation Philosophy... 2 Purpose... 3 Objectives...
More informationSupervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy
1. Background 2. Guiding Principles 3. Definitions 4. Teacher Appraisal 5. Roles and Responsibilities 6. Documentation Appendix A Nova Scotia Education Act, Section 26 Duties 1. Background Through section
More informationNC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
More informationTHE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and Key Components... 1 1. Core of Effective Practices... 1 2. Student Growth... 2 3. Evaluation Rating Criteria... 13 4. Teacher and Principal Involvement... 14 5.
More informationSt. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors
St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors Brooklyn Campus Long Island Campus 245 Clinton Avenue 155 West Roe Boulevard Brooklyn, NY
More informationTEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK College, Career Career & Citizen-Ready! Table of Contents Part 1: Introduction Purpose Part 2: Standards of Effective Teaching Performance Standards Sample Performance
More informationTOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
More informationPROFESSIONAL COUNSELOR PORTFOLIO I. Introduction
PROFESSIONAL COUNSELOR PORTFOLIO I. Introduction A professional counselor portfolio is a collection of artifacts and reflective components that demonstrate mastery of program standards as evidenced in
More informationTEACHNJ ACT. New Evaluation Implementation 2013-14 School Year Required by State of NJ
TEACHNJ ACT New Evaluation Implementation 2013-14 School Year Required by State of NJ Charles Maranzano, Jr., Superintendent Hopatcong Borough Public Schools 1 Evaluation Reform in NJ Evaluation Reform
More informationModel for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional Evaluation
More informationCITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION
CITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT GUIDE TO PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION Board Review April 2009 Table of Contents Topic Page Statutory Authority for Performance-Based... 1 Philosophy...
More informationWisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Principal Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
More informationThe School Leadership Collaborative Intern and Administrative Mentor Guide
Gonzaga University School of Education The School Leadership Collaborative Intern and Administrative Mentor Guide Principal Certification Program Administrator Certification Department of Educational Leadership
More informationSALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers
SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers Mentor Signature: Mentee Signatures: MONTH: What s Working: Current Focus
More informationTeacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
More informationHamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review
Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review All teacher* evaluations and professional growth shall be governed by the following procedures: *NOTE: The word Teacher throughout
More informationOhio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016
Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016 Table of Contents Preface... 5 The Ohio Standards for School Counselors... 5 Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Framework... 6 School Counselor Evaluation
More informationa. A brief description of the assessment, its use in the program, and how the assessment is aligned to standards
National Education Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS*Teachers) Undergraduates enrolled in ETC 447 Fall 2011 Fall 2014 (1) Alignment & Data Findings a. A brief description of the assessment, its use
More informationPracticum/Internship Handbook. Office of Educational Field Experiences
Practicum/Internship Handbook Office of Educational Field Experiences Northwest Missouri State University 2015-2016 1 General Information and Standards The practicum/internship is designed to provide students
More informationNorfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Norfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System The Norfolk Public Schools does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, national origin, religion, age, political affiliation, veteran
More informationCounselor Summative Assessment: Evaluation Process
3 Counselor Summative Assessment: Evaluation Process With higher standards for student learning, counselors are also expected to demonstrate higher standards of professional practice. While the NNPS assessment
More informationWHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM REVISED SPRING 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Development And Evaluation Process: Tenure Track Faculty... 4 Overview Of Mentoring And Evaluation Process
More informationADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Board Received: Review Date: Accountability: 1. Frequency of Reports As needed 2. Severity Threshold As needed (eg. Changes in Ministry guidelines/collective
More informationOak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program
Oak Park School District Administrator Evaluation Program Table of Contents Evaluation Purpose...1 Evaluation Timeline...2 Rubric for Instructional Administrator Standard 1...3 Standard 2...5 Standard
More informationSetting Professional Goals*
Setting Professional Goals* Beginning teachers are often overwhelmed by the scope of their work and the day-to-day demands of classroom instruction. Stepping back from and reflecting upon their teaching
More informationNorth Carolina School Nurse Evaluation Process
North Carolina School Nurse Evaluation Process Users Guide May 2013 Acknowledgements The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction gratefully acknowledges the School Nursing Evaluation Development
More informationMississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR
Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR 2014-15 Process Manual Last Modified 8/25/14 The Mississippi State Board of Education, the Mississippi Department of Education, the Mississippi School of the
More informationThe Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool. 1 9-1-11 Final
The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool 1 The Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool The Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool is intended to assist district/schools
More informationErlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Evaluation Plan for Certified Personnel
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Evaluation Plan for Certified Personnel Erlanger-Elsmere Board of Education 500 Graves Avenue Erlanger, Kentucky 41018 Dr. Kathlyn Burkhardt, Superintendent Philosophy...
More informationSuch alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.
Teacher Desired Qualifications: A Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university. Appropriate teaching certificate. Ability to work with students, teachers, and parents. Such alternatives to
More informationHoward Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System
Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System 1 Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Schools The system described in this resource is the Minnesota Marzano Teacher Evaluation
More informationPART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION
PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION Ed 512.01 Basic Requirement. Each school administrative unit, local school district, or participating nonpublic school shall prepare
More informationSection 2b: Observation/Feedback Approach
Section 2b: Observation/Feedback Approach Observation/Feedback is a collegial, professional development approach that encourages practitioners to analyze, critique, practice, reflect, and revise instructional
More informationCorrelation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model
Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model LEARNING-FOCUSED provides schools and districts with the best solutions
More informationAdvancing Professional Excellence Guide Table of Contents
1 Advancing Professional Excellence Guide Table of Contents APEX Values and Beliefs History and Development of APEX Purpose of APEX Components of APEX The APEX Process APEX Process Timeline Training/Orientation
More informationBAA Peer Tutoring 11. District Number: SD #43. Date Developed: March 2004. Board/Authority Approval Date: April 20, 2004. Board/Authority Signature:
District name: Coquitlam District Number: SD #43 Developed by: Lasta Graf Date Developed: March 2004 School Name: Principal's Name: Dr. Charles Best Secondary Brian Fichter Board/Authority Approval Date:
More informationTeacher Observation Form
Teacher Observation Form The Novato Unified School District Teacher Evaluation is based, in part, on a formal discussion of performances and conferences conducted on the following dates: Temporary (Conference
More informationGLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS
GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK All learners whether adult or child acquire the attitudes, skills and knowledge needed for
More informationEDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 CERTIFIED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PLAN
EDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 CERTIFIED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PLAN Developed 2012 Page 1 of 11 EVALUATION PROCESS AND SCHEDULE FOR TEACHERS AND CERTIFICATED SCHOOL SERVICE PERSONNEL Evaluation
More informationHIGH SCHOOL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION COMPONENTS AND FORMS PART A: EVALUATION FORM FOR HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Name: School Assignment/Position:
HIGH SCHOOL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION COMPONENTS AND FORMS PART A: EVALUATION FORM FOR HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELOR Name: Evaluation Year: School Assignment/Position: Total Years of Administrative/Teaching
More informationMATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS Revised 07/03/12 By David R. Skocy, Ph.D. Purpose: NON-TENURED SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES
More informationRise Indiana School Counselor Rubric
Rise Indiana School Counselor Rubric 1 Domain 1: Academic Achievement 1.1 The School Counselor Utilizes Data To Monitor Student Achievement And Works Collaboratively With Stakeholders To Enhance Student
More informationMaster s Degree Portfolio Project
Master s Degree Portfolio Project Introduction The portfolio project serves as the capstone activity for the master s degree program in the Department of Secondary Education. The portfolio will provide
More informationCLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Licensed Employee Appraisal System Enhancing Professional Practice Professional Domain Standards and Indicators Levels of Performance Rubric
More informationTBL Certification Requirements
TBL Certification Requirements The Center for Teaching Thinking (CTT) offers workshops and classroom coaching for teachers on infusing instruction in thinking skills into content instruction worldwide.
More informationFridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary
Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary Fridley School District Alternative Compensation Plan is a district wide program that is approved by the Minnesota Department of Education and was
More informationFramework for Leadership
Framework for Leadership Date Leader Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership Principals/school leaders systemically and collaboratively develop a positive culture to
More informationSection Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
More informationMississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
More informationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook For Teacher Professional Development Offerings Modified for use by the District and School
More informationThe University of Mississippi School of Education
The University of Mississippi School of Education Master s Degree in Literacy Education Department of Teacher Education Educators as Reflective Professionals Graduate Handbook Revised Fall 2012 1 Table
More informationTeacher Generated Examples of Artifacts and Evidence. Criterion Element Example Artifacts/ Evidence
Criterion 1: Centering instruction on high expectations for student achievement 2b: Establishing a culture for learning 3a: Communicating with students 3c: Engaging Students in learning student generated
More informationPreparing for the Vice-Principal Selection Process
Preparing for the Vice-Principal Selection Process 2014-15 Education Centre Aurora, 60 Wellington Street West, Aurora, Ontario, L4G 3H2 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR Dear Colleagues: Congratulations on aspiring
More informationEDUCATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT PLAN 2015-2016
EDUCATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT PLAN 2015-2016 May 18, 2015 1 MISSION Regional School District 4, Chester, Deep River, and Essex will initiate, support, and facilitate partnerships, collaborations and
More informationPrincipal Appraisal Overview
Improving teaching, leading and learning T e x a s P r i n c i p a l E va l u a t i o n S y s t e m Principal Appraisal Overview Design and Development a collaborative effort McREL International Texas
More informationAlignment of State Standards and Teacher Preparation Program Standards
Alignment of State Standards and Teacher Preparation Program Standards Hilda Medrano Jaime Curts The University of Texas Pan American (UTPA), at the most southern tip of South Texas is located about 20
More informationCandidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.
EDET 628 Apply instructional design principles to create a unit of instruction which integrates technology and enhances student understanding Demonstrate purposeful alignment of state competencies and
More informationEvaluation of School Psychologists
Evaluation of Psychologists 2013 Directors Institute Dr. Elizabeth Danielson Coordinator of Psychological Services Mesa Public s Context for Evaluation of Psychologists in Arizona 2010 Arizona Statute
More informationNORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Teacher: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of the
More informationMathematics Education Master of Education Degree Program PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO RUBRIC Candidate: ID#: Date: Evaluator:
Mathematics Education Master of Education Degree Program PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO RUBRIC Candidate: ID#: Date: Evaluator: Recommendations: Evaluator Signature: Grade: PASS FAIL Developing Acceptable Optimum
More informationISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_profiles.html
NETS for Teachers Profiles for Technology-Literate Teachers Today's teacher preparation programs provide a variety of alternative paths to initial licensure. They address economic conditions, needs of
More informationTechnical Review Coversheet
Status: Submitted Last Updated: 8/6/1 4:17 PM Technical Review Coversheet Applicant: Seattle Public Schools -- Strategic Planning and Alliances, (S385A1135) Reader #1: ********** Questions Evaluation Criteria
More informationWhat Are the Benefits of Analyzing Student Work?
01-Bella.qxd 11/17/03 3:40 PM Page 1 What Are the Benefits of Analyzing Student Work? 1 W hat s in it for me? That s the question many educators secretly ask themselves when they are presented with a new
More informationMercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse
Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse Name: Date: Observer: Post-Observation Date: Domain 2 Domain 3 2a. Creating an environment of respect and 3a. Assessing student needs rapport 2b.
More informationTEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
201 TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Observation and Evaluation Forms and Procedures for Instructional Practice Effective July 1, 201 A Comprehensive System for Professional Development and Annual
More informationFRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation
FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation A GUIDEBOOK FOR TEACHERS & ADMINISTRATORS 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Superintendent... iii Introduction...
More information2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric Exclusive partners with Dr. Robert J. Marzano for the Teacher Evaluation Model and School Leader Evaluation Model Learning Sciences International 175
More informationVerification of Experience Multiple and Single Subject Credential Programs
Verification of Experience Multiple and Single Subject Credential Programs Teaching Credential Programs 2500 E. Nutwood Ave. Fullerton, CA 92831 USA (714) 879-3901 FAX (714) 738-4565 Email: grad-admissions@hiu.edu
More informationMaster of Science in Early Childhood Education Singapore, 2005 2006
Master of Science in Early Childhood Education Singapore, 2005 2006 Offered by RTRC Asia in Collaboration with Wheelock College s Center for International Education, Leadership, and Innovation Background
More informationReflective Practice: Goals for Professional Growth Library Media Specialist
Reflective Practice: Goals for Professional Growth Library Media Specialist Professional s Instructional Program I integrate the teaching of information skills with curriculum standards and classroom content.
More informationMarion County Instruction Evaluation System
MARION COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Marion County Instruction Evaluation System MCIES 2013-2014 George D. Tomyn, Superintendent Marion County Instructional Evaluation System Philosophy Educating others is a complex
More informationEducator Evaluation Gradual Implementation Guidebook
Learning to Succeed Educator Evaluation Gradual Implementation Guidebook Version 1.0 1 Portland Public Schools * 196 Allen Avenue * Portland, Maine 04103 * Phone: (207) 874-8100 Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationPrincipal Practice Observation Tool
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
More informationProgram Guide for Graduation Transitions
Program Guide for Graduation Transitions June 2008 Attributes of a BC Graduate During a year-long, province-wide consultation, thousands of BC citizens identified the following characteristics of the ideal
More informationStandards and progression point examples
Personal Learning In Personal Learning, standards for assessing and reporting on student achievement are introduced at Level 3. The learning focus statements for Levels Foundation, 1 and 2 provide advice
More informationTeacher Education Dispositions
Teacher Education Dispositions Role of Dispositions Teaching involves more than effective planning, instructional knowledge, and teaching skills. It also extends to professional dispositions. Dispositions
More informationPERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610 Performance Evaluation Instructional Staff Performance Evaluation Philosophy of Evaluation A performance-based evaluation system is critical to improving teaching, thus
More informationCommittee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation
Committee On Public Secondary Schools Standards for Accreditation Effective 2011 New England Association of Schools & Colleges 3 Burlington Woods Drive, Suite 100 Burlington, MA 01803 Tel. 781-425-7700
More informationNew York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) New York State. Professional Development Standards. An Introduction
New York State Professional Development Standards New York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) Background on the Development of the Standards New York State Professional Development Standards
More information