ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP)
|
|
- Clarence Gray
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ROCORI SCHOOLS ISD 750 ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP) To be central Minnesota s public education standard of excellence A joint agreement between Education Minnesota-ROCORI and ISD 750 Board of Education
2 改 善 Kaizen 1
3 Agreement The Teacher Evaluation Committee, comprised of members from Education Minnesota ROCORI and delegates of the Board of Education, ISD 750 have jointly developed the ROCORI PDP to satisfy the requirements of Minnesota Statute 122A.40 Subd. 8. Should the Minnesota Legislature make changes to the statute, a Teacher Evaluation Committee (TEC) will be formed upon the request of either the District or EM-R to determine the future applicability of the PDP. In addition, should the district or EM-R decide to modify the agreement, a notice must be provided to the other of the desire to re-establish the TEC. Both the District and EM-R recognize that a failure to notify the other to form a TEC prior to June 29th will lead to joint participation in the ROCORI PDP during the following school year. If, upon commission of a TEC, both parties are unable to jointly agree on an evaluation plan, the state model, as provided by the Minnesota Department of Education, must be used. Education Minnesota-ROCORI ratified the agreement among its members on Signature: Date: Name: Education Minnesota-ROCORI, President The Board of Education, ISD 750 approved the agreement on Signature: Date: Name: Board of Education ISD 750, Chair 2
4 Purpose ROCORI Schools strives to be the Central Minnesota s public education Standard of Excellence. To meet this vision, The Board of ROCORI Schools, Administrators, and Education Minnesota ROCORI have a common goal of improving the efficacy of educators. All stakeholders recognize the direct relationship between teacher efficacy and improvements in student achievement at ROCORI. The purpose of the ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP) is to develop the full potential of all teachers through an individualized program that utilizes self-assessment, peer coaching, and reflection. As such, the ROCORI PDP will be implemented annually to facilitate the professional development of all educators in the EM-R unit. The implementation of this program also satisfies the requirements of Minnesota Statute 122A.40 Subd. 8. Applicability The ROCORI PDP, as an agreement between EM-R and ISD 750, applies to all professionals in ROCORI Schools guided by the Master Agreement. In addition to the requirements of the PDP, probationary staff will participate in the induction program as monitored by the Induction Committee. Moving forward, the Board and representatives from EM-R will designate a joint team, consisting of equal representation between EM-R and District representatives, to monitor the effectiveness and implementation of the ROCORI PDP. Future alterations of the ROCORI PDP will be through a consensus of the joint committee. ON/OFF Cycle Each year, the director of CIA, in collaboration with building administrators, will produce a list of all teaching staff and their cycle year. ON Cycle refers to those teachers who are due for their three year summative evaluation. All probationary teachers are considered ON Cycle. OFF Cycle refers to teachers who are on year 1 or 2. Program components are the same for ON and OFF Cycle, as indicated in Figure 1; the difference being that administrators perform the observation during ON Cycle and follow up with a Summative Evaluation Conference. It is understood that to begin the PDP process, all continuing contract staff will be established within a Cycle so as to have an even distribution among Years 1, 2, and 3 as much as possible. 3
5 TIMELINE / CHECKLIST ROCORI Professional Development Program ON Cycle Staff Professional Growth Plan (PGP) Complete PGP and Submit to Administrator End of Trimester 1 Complete Reflection of PGP End of Trimester 2 Complete Reflection of PGP and submit to Administrator End of Trimester 3 Student Learning Goal (SLG) Complete SLG and document reflection End of Trimester 1 Analyze, Reflect, and Modify SLG On-going Submit SLG to Administrator End of Trimester 3 Observation Incorporate PGP and SLG into Observation plan End of Trimester 1 Facilitate Pre-Observation Conference with Administrator Observation by Administrator Facilitate Post-Observation Conference with Administrator Summative Evaluation Summative Evaluation Conference with Administrator April 30th OFF Cycle Staff Professional Growth Plan (PGP) Complete PGP and Submit to Administrator and Peer Observer End of Trimester 1 Complete Reflection of PGP End of Trimester 2 Complete Reflection of PGP and submit to Administrator End of Trimester 3 Student Learning Goal (SLG) Complete SLG and document reflection End of Trimester 1 Analyze, Reflect, and Modify SLG On-going Submit SLG to Administrator End of Trimester 3 Observation Incorporate PGP and SLG into Observation plan End of Trimester 1 Facilitate Pre-Observation Conference with Peer Observer Observation by Peer Observer Facilitate Post-Observation Conference with Peer Observer Submit Reflection to Administrator End of Trimester 3 Figure 1: ROCORI PDP Timeline/Checklist 4
6 改 善 Professional Growth Plan (PGP) Program Components The PGP is designed for teacher s to be empowered for individualized professional development. ROCORI PDP utilizes 2013 version of the The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument (Framework) produced by the Danielson Group. The Framework outlines broad domains to capture the breadth of teacher s work. It is recommended that teachers identify one specific domain or element within the Framework to focus their work. The complete Framework can be found by accessing the link: A summary version of the Framework is provided on the Teacher Self-Assessment Worksheet (found in the Appendices). Teachers may choose to self-assess their practice prior to determining a focus domain. It is also recommended that teachers consult previous evaluations or observation notes when developing the PGP. A major point of the ROCORI PDP is to facilitate a positive and collaborative learning culture. As such, teachers may consult peers, coaches, and administrators when developing their PGP. When completing the PGP, teachers will be asked to provide information related to the focus domain, a professional growth goal, a rationale for the goal, and an outline of specific action steps. Teachers should take care when completing this document as it serves as the foundation of their professional development work for the year, including the Observation phase of this ccpdp process. The goal-setting portion of the PGP, along with identifying action steps, should be completed by the end of trimester 1. Teachers should reflect on an ongoing basis regarding their action steps prior to submitting the finalized PGP Form to an administrator at the end of the school year. 改 善 Student Learning Goal (SLG) The SLG must be a standards-based SMART goal (see Figure 2) that a teacher, or group of teachers, seeks to attain during the course of the school year. It is suggested that teachers collaborate with colleagues from their Professional Learning Community (PLC) or department to develop a common SLG. The SLG may change over the course of the year to reflect changes in curriculum, instruction, students, and/or assessment strategies. The most essential characteristic of the SLG is that it is meaningful for the teacher and students. The SLG form has been established for an individual teacher or team members to establish the goal, reflect continuously about student progress toward the goal, and document any changes or insights that impact the level of success achieved. The SLG must be submitted to the Administrator upon adoption and completion of the goal. The timeline associated with the SLG can be found in Figure1. This component satisfies 35% of the summative evaluation as directed by MN Statute 122A.40. 改 善 Observation The Observation process is intended to be standards-based, utilizing the Framework. Administrators will complete the observation work with teachers who are ON Cycle while OFF Cycle teachers will work with a peer observer in a more informal process. For the purpose of the Observation, a selected Peer Observer must also hold a valid Minnesota Teaching License. It is recommended that a peer observer be selected from the teacher s grade level, department, or PLC. 5
7 The purpose of the Observation is to gain feedback on the progress made toward implementing the goals of the Professional Growth Plan. The real impact of the observation comes from the reflection of the teacher being observed. The Peer Observer or Administrator will also assess the level of student engagement during the lesson. The individual teacher being observed has the responsibility to assume leadership in the growth process by initiating the scheduling and dialogue processes. It is important to note that a common Observation Form (found in Appendix C) is used for both ON Cycle and OFF Cycle staff. However, during an OFF Cycle year, the observation notes and student engagement sections are NOT submitted to the administrator. For the purpose of the ROCORI ccpdp, it is expected that all components of the Observation (Preconference, observation, post-conference) be completed by. SMART Goals A SMART goal clarifies exactly what is expected and the measures used to determine if the goal is achieved and successfully completed Specific and Strategic Measurable Appropriate/Attainable Relevant/Results Oriented Time Framed Measurable The success toward meeting the goal can be measured. Students are aware of how they are meeting standards. Results/data can be collected and analyzed. Assessments tools aligned with student learning goal. Periodic Formative/Summative evaluations. Relevant / Results Oriented The goals are aligned with current tasks and projects and focus in one defined area; include the expected result. Students engaged in meaningful learning. Students are being prepared for the future. Learning is standards based. Matches the needs of the students. Specific & Strategic Desired outcome or result is clearly defined. Identify the target. Identify the plan Appropriate/Attainable Goals are challenging but realistic. Goals can be achieved in a specific amount of time. Goals are reasonable. Time Framed Goals have a clearly defined time-frame including a target or deadline date. Student learning is ongoing and embedded throughout the defined time frame. Sufficient data can be collected in defined time frame Figure 2: SMART Goals Defined characteristics to be considered when developing SLG/PGP 6
8 改 善 Summative Evaluation (ON Cycle Staff Only) The Summative Evaluation represents the culmination of a teacher s professional development work over a 3 year period. Administrators will gather all PGPs and SLGs from the previous two years of professional growth outlined in the plan. A Summative Evaluation conference will be facilitated by the Administrator to discuss the artifacts with the teacher and determine appropriate placement on the Framework. The teacher may elect to complete a portfolio which further demonstrates their knowledge, skills, and behavior toward meeting the Standards. The portfolio may include student work samples, video recordings, and any other examples of teacher improvement related to the Framework. If a teacher is determined to need remediation according to the Standards set forth in the Framework, the administrator will work with the teacher to outline a plan of improvement with provided deadlines. The administrator will also identify methods of support that will be provided to the teacher by the District. Considerations The Teacher Evaluation Committee recommends that other committees within the ROCORI Schools system actively support the ROCORI PDP with time and resources. Flexible time, Professional Learning Communities, Collaboration time, scheduling, and staff development all need to be considered for the ROCORI PDP to be implemented with fidelity. 7
9 Glossary Administrator Individual who holds a valid administrative license from the State of Minnesota Department of Education and is assigned to supervise the Teacher. Board The Board of Education for Independent School District 750. CIA District EM-R Framework Induction Peer Observer PDP PGP PLC SLG Standards Teacher Refers to the Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment team of ROCORI Schools or other individuals/teams that may eventually take its place. The entirety of ISD 750 (The Board, personnel, and resources) Education Minnesota-ROCORI The Framework for Teachers Evaluation Instrument The professional growth and mentoring program offered under the direction of the Induction Committee. An individual, chosen by the Teacher, to serve in this capacity must also be certified to teach by the Department of Education for the State of Minnesota. Most often, the Peer Observer will be a member of the Teachers PLC or department. Professional Development Program, often referred to as the ROCORI PDP. The system of evaluation and professional growth used for teachers. Professional Growth Plan, a component of the Professional Development Program A Professional Learning Community represents any collection of professionals gathered for working on a common purpose related to the professional growth. Student Learning Goal, a component of the Professional Devleopment Program. Qualities of effective practice outlined in the Framework. Subject of the ROCORI PDP. Any person who holds a position in ROCORI Schools which requires a valid license from the State of Minnesota. Teacher Evaluation Committee (TEC) the joint committee of Education Minnesota-ROCORI and administrative representatives of ISD 750 responsible for developing a teacher evaluation plan in accordance with MN statutes. 8
10 Appendices 改 善 Professional Growth Plan (PGP) Form Student Learning Goal (SLG) Form Observation Form Summative Evaluation Form Teacher Self-Assessment Worksheet The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument v
Evaluation System for Classified & Management Support Staff
Evaluation System for Classified & Management Support Staff August 2012 Grant Wood Area Education Agency extends equal opportunities in its employment practices, educational programs and services, and
More informationSt. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents
St. Charles School District Growth Guide and Evaluation Documents 2014-2015 City of St. Charles School District MISSION The City of St. Charles School District will REACH, TEACH, and EMPOWER all students
More informationEssential Principles of Effective Evaluation
Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation The growth and learning of children is the primary responsibility of those who teach in our classrooms and lead our schools. Student growth and learning can
More informationParticipant Guidebook
Participant Guidebook Module 1 Understand Teacher Practice Growth through Learning s Module 1 Understand Teacher Practice Guidebook 1 Participant Guidebook Overview Based upon successful completion of
More informationPERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610 Performance Evaluation Instructional Staff Performance Evaluation Philosophy of Evaluation A performance-based evaluation system is critical to improving teaching, thus
More informationWisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Principal Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
More informationOptional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP
Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP This optional individual teacher PDP template is provided to assist teachers, educational services staff, and supervisors in
More informationADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE HR113 Teacher Performance Appraisal Board Received: Review Date: Accountability: 1. Frequency of Reports As needed 2. Severity Threshold As needed (eg. Changes in Ministry guidelines/collective
More informationCITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION
CITY OF ST. CHARLES SCHOOL DISTRICT GUIDE TO PERFORMANCE-BASED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION Board Review April 2009 Table of Contents Topic Page Statutory Authority for Performance-Based... 1 Philosophy...
More informationTHE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
, 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose and Key Components... 1 1. Core of Effective Practices... 1 2. Student Growth... 2 3. Evaluation Rating Criteria... 13 4. Teacher and Principal Involvement... 14 5.
More informationHamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review
Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review All teacher* evaluations and professional growth shall be governed by the following procedures: *NOTE: The word Teacher throughout
More informationOhio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016
Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Model MAY 2016 Table of Contents Preface... 5 The Ohio Standards for School Counselors... 5 Ohio School Counselor Evaluation Framework... 6 School Counselor Evaluation
More informationWisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Teacher Evaluation Process Manual Updated February 2016 This manual is an interim update to remove inaccurate information. A more comprehensive update for 2016-17
More informationGreenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool
Greenville City Schools Teacher Evaluation Tool Table of Contents Introduction to Teacher Evaluation 2 Glossary 3 Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities 5 Teacher Evaluation Rubric 6 Self-Assessment 11
More informationHUNTINGDON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
1 Board Approved 3.17.14 HUNTINGDON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION MODEL COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mr. Fred Foster Mr. Sean Powers Mrs. Deborah Luffy Mr. Brian Pelka Mrs. Robin Whitsel Mr. Travis
More informationPrincipal Appraisal Overview
Improving teaching, leading and learning T e x a s P r i n c i p a l E va l u a t i o n S y s t e m Principal Appraisal Overview Design and Development a collaborative effort McREL International Texas
More informationMercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse
Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse Name: Date: Observer: Post-Observation Date: Domain 2 Domain 3 2a. Creating an environment of respect and 3a. Assessing student needs rapport 2b.
More informationWV School Counseling Program Audit
The program audit is used to assess the school counseling program in comparison with West Virginia s Model for School Counseling Programs. Audits serve to set the standard for the school counseling program.
More informationCounselor Summative Assessment: Evaluation Process
3 Counselor Summative Assessment: Evaluation Process With higher standards for student learning, counselors are also expected to demonstrate higher standards of professional practice. While the NNPS assessment
More informationSteps for ME1 New School Nurse
Steps for ME1 New School Nurse STEPS FOR MENTORING EXPERIENCE ONE (ME1) NEW SCHOOL NURSE Welcome to School Nursing, a most challenging and fulfilling professional career! During the first few weeks of
More informationHoward Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System
Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Teacher Evaluation System 1 Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model Howard Lake-Waverly-Winsted Schools The system described in this resource is the Minnesota Marzano Teacher Evaluation
More informationPART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION
PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION Ed 512.01 Basic Requirement. Each school administrative unit, local school district, or participating nonpublic school shall prepare
More informationMaine School Administrative District #57
Maine School Administrative District #57 Professional Learning Communities Support System Plan Developed 2008 MSAD #57 Board Approved: May 28, 2008 Section A MSAD #57 includes the towns of Alfred, Limerick,
More informationMaine DOE Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Model
Maine DOE Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Model A Handbook and Implementation Guide for School Administrative Units (2014-2015) 23 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333 Systemic
More informationSupervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy
1. Background 2. Guiding Principles 3. Definitions 4. Teacher Appraisal 5. Roles and Responsibilities 6. Documentation Appendix A Nova Scotia Education Act, Section 26 Duties 1. Background Through section
More informationTEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
201 TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Observation and Evaluation Forms and Procedures for Instructional Practice Effective July 1, 201 A Comprehensive System for Professional Development and Annual
More informationMississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR
Mississippi Counselor Appraisal Rubric M-CAR 2014-15 Process Manual Last Modified 8/25/14 The Mississippi State Board of Education, the Mississippi Department of Education, the Mississippi School of the
More informationAdvancing Professional Excellence Guide Table of Contents
1 Advancing Professional Excellence Guide Table of Contents APEX Values and Beliefs History and Development of APEX Purpose of APEX Components of APEX The APEX Process APEX Process Timeline Training/Orientation
More informationFRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation
FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation A GUIDEBOOK FOR TEACHERS & ADMINISTRATORS 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Superintendent... iii Introduction...
More informationIOWA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
IOWA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Guidance on the Iowa Teacher Leadership and Compensation System July 15, 2013 Overview Division VII of House File 215 establishes the Teacher Leadership and Compensation System,
More informationCoaching Expectations
Coaching Expectations School- based coaches are selected by the principal and must have the necessary skills and qualifications as stated in the District s new job descriptions (Literacy, Science, Mathematics).
More informationMississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
More informationQ Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles
Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles Program Purposes The purpose of the Q Comp program is for participating school districts, intermediate school districts, integration districts, state schools/academies
More informationFridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary
Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary Fridley School District Alternative Compensation Plan is a district wide program that is approved by the Minnesota Department of Education and was
More informationTeacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
More informationOak Park School District. Counselor Evaluation Program
Oak Park School District Counselor Evaluation Program Table of Contents Foreword... 1 Purpose of Evaluation... 3 Timelines for Implementation... 3 Overview of Counselor Evaluation... 4 Plan I Individual
More informationWV School Counseling Program Audit
The program audit is used to assess the school counseling program in comparison with West Virginia s Model for School Counseling Programs. Audits serve to set the standard for the school counseling program.
More informationPerformance-Based Evaluation Handbook
Baltimore City Public School System Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook Department of Professional Development Performance-Based Evaluation October 2003 PBES Handbook (Revised 2003) i Table of Contents
More informationBest Practices in High Growth Schools. Fiscal Year 2016. Report. To the. Legislature. As required by. Minnesota Statutes,
Best Practices in High Growth Schools Fiscal Year 2016 Report To the Legislature As required by Minnesota Statutes, section 120B.35, Subdivision 4 COMMISSIONER: Brenda Cassellius, Ed. D. Best Practices
More informationIllinois State Board of Education
Illinois State Board of Education February 2013 Guidance Document 13-06 Model Teacher Evaluation System Measuring Student Growth Using Type III Assessments This document is intended to provide non-regulatory
More informationI. THE PLAN. Init.10/10
I. THE PLAN Professional employees will be grouped into four categories, or STAGES. Teacher evaluation occurs through a variety of activities: (1) required supervisory activities, (2) personalized supervisory
More informationGaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards
GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards Purpose: Georgia has identified a need to improve P-12 students academic performance as measured by various assessments. One method to ensure improved student
More informationTeacher Performance Evaluation System TPES
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES The Code of Virginia 22.1253.13.5 states, in part, the following: B. Consistent with the finding that leadership is essential for the advancement of public education
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs): MINNESOTA S STAFF DEVELOPMENT STATUTES Minnesota Statutes, sections 122A.60 and 122A.61
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs): MINNESOTA S STAFF DEVELOPMENT STATUTES Minnesota Statutes, sections 122A.60 and 122A.61 Created September 2001 Updated July 2002, March 2006, February 2008, November
More informationA Guide to Implementing Principal Performance Evaluation in Illinois
A Guide to Implementing Principal Performance Evaluation in Illinois Prepared by the Illinois Principals Association & Illinois Association of School Administrators Why This Guide? Implementing a new principal
More informationModel for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation
Model for Instructional Improvement Teacher Evaluation Implemented 2008-09 Revised August 15, 2011 Table of Contents Vision and Mission Statements... 2 Teacher Evaluation Philosophy... 2 Purpose... 3 Objectives...
More informationPROFESSIONAL EVALUATION HANDBOOK
FOR TEACHERS, STUDENT SERVICES PROFESSIONALS, STUDENT SERVICES PROFESSIONALS ITINERANT, CURRICULUM SPECIALISTS, AND EVALUATORS Denver Public Schools 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Types of Evaluation
More informationNew Prague Area Schools ISD 721. 2012-2017 Technology Plan
New Prague Area Schools ISD 721 2012-2017 Plan 0 Table of Contents District Mission, Vision, and Values... 2 Demographics of School District... 2 Organization Leadership and Planning... 3 Needs Assessment...
More informationMATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS Revised 07/03/12 By David R. Skocy, Ph.D. Purpose: NON-TENURED SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES
More informationEDUCATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT PLAN 2015-2016
EDUCATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT PLAN 2015-2016 May 18, 2015 1 MISSION Regional School District 4, Chester, Deep River, and Essex will initiate, support, and facilitate partnerships, collaborations and
More informationCyber School Student Teaching Competencies
Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies Introduction The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) has developed a general set of student teaching competencies that afford a student teacher the opportunity
More informationEducator Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth System
Educator Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth System September 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Stakeholders Group... 2 Beliefs... 3 Development Process... 4 Steering Committee Membership...
More informationTeacher Performance Evaluation System
Chandler Unified School District Teacher Performance Evaluation System Revised 2015-16 Purpose The purpose of this guide is to outline Chandler Unified School District s teacher evaluation process. The
More information2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric Exclusive partners with Dr. Robert J. Marzano for the Teacher Evaluation Model and School Leader Evaluation Model Learning Sciences International 175
More informationNC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
More informationColorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
More informationChapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act. Part 1 General Provisions
Chapter 8a Public Education Human Resource Management Act Part 1 General Provisions 53A-8a-101 Title. This chapter is known as the "Public Education Human Resource Management Act." 53A-8a-102 Definitions.
More informationSelf-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction 1.1 The system engages in a systematic, inclusive, and comprehensive process to review, revise, and communicate a system-wide propose for the student success. The system
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Performance Evaluation for UTLA Bargaining Unit Personnel John E. Deasy, Ph.D. Superintendent Justo Avila, Chief Human Resources Officer Human Resources Division Rachel Bonkovsky,
More informationPerformance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
More informationTEACHER IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TEACHER IMPROVEMENT PLAN Educators whose performance is evaluated as ineffective or developing, as determined by a school administrator, may be required to undertake an educator improvement plan (TIP)
More informationPERFORMANCE EVALUATION HANDBOOK FOR TEACHERS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION HANDBOOK FOR TEACHERS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA TEACHER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND DESCRIPTORS The following criteria and descriptors are
More informationSample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*
Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1* This form must be used for each performance appraisal. The duties of the principal may be delegated to a vice-principal in the same school,
More informationinchester Public Schools
inchester Public Schools SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION School Psychologist Evaluation SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION Introduction The licensed personnel who staff our classrooms who provide related services
More informationTEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. Technical Requirements Manual
TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Technical Requirements Manual 2010 This publication is available on the Ministry of Education s website at www.edu.gov.on.ca. Une publication équivalente est disponible en
More informationPossible Guiding Questions: Strategic Discussions between Supervising Administrators and Curriculum & Instruction Supervisors
Strategic Discussions between Supervising Administrators and Curriculum & Instruction Supervisors This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding questions
More informationLeadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals
Possible Guiding Questions Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrators and Principals This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding
More informationMarion County Instruction Evaluation System
MARION COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Marion County Instruction Evaluation System MCIES 2013-2014 George D. Tomyn, Superintendent Marion County Instructional Evaluation System Philosophy Educating others is a complex
More informationMaine School Administrative District #33
Maine School Administrative District #33 Professional Learning Communities Support System HANDBOOK Section A MSAD #33 includes the towns of Frenchville and St. Agatha and is composed of one elementary
More informationTexas Teacher Evaluation and Support System FAQ
A. Overview 1. *What is T-TESS? Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System FAQ T-TESS is the Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System. It is a new teacher evaluation system for the state of Texas designed
More informationSelf Assessment. Orange County Public Schools. Dr. Barbara Jenkins, Superintendent 445 W Amelia St Orlando, FL 32801-1129
Dr. Barbara Jenkins, Superintendent 445 W Amelia St Orlando, FL 32801-1129 Document Generated On April 13, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Purpose and Direction 2 Governance and Leadership 8 Teaching
More informationPERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPALS, EXECUTIVES AND TEACHERS IN NSW PUBLIC SCHOOLS
PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPALS, EXECUTIVES AND TEACHERS IN NSW PUBLIC SCHOOLS Introduction and Context The NSW Department of Education and Communities is committed to attracting,
More informationInformational Webinar for MDE Literacy Support Schools. Agenda
Informational Webinar for MDE Literacy Support Schools School Year 2015-2016 Agenda Literacy-Based Promotion Act (Senate Bill 2347) Overview Timeline Role of the MDE Literacy Coach District and School
More informationSection Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
More informationFormative Assessment for California Teachers. Assessment of Teaching and Learning
Formative Assessment for California Teachers Assessment of Teaching and Learning FACT System Modules A. Context for Teaching and Learning B. Assessment of Teaching and Learning C. Inquiry into Teaching
More informationDanielson Framework- Example Artifacts/Elements. Domain 1- Planning and Preparation and Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities
Danielson Framework- Example Artifacts/Elements Domain 1- Planning and Preparation and Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities Domain 1- Planning and Preparation and Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities
More informationProfessional Education Competence Program
Professional Education Competence Program PEC Program Purpose Statement: OVERVIEW The Highlands County Professional Education Competence (PEC) Program, aligned with the Florida Educator Accomplished Practices
More informationFBISD Performance Management Playbook
FBISD Performance Management Playbook Table of Contents Table of Contents. 2 Introduction... 3 Layers of Performance 3 The FBISD Performance Cycle... 4 Components of the FBISD Performance Cycle.. 4 Performance
More informationPRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001
Management Competencies and Sample Indicators for the Improvement of Adult Education Programs A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project PRO-NET April 2001
More informationHow To Teach In Rhode Island
1 EDITION II The contents of this guidebook were developed under a Race to the Top grant from the Department of Education. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department
More informationACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet
ACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet How are students achieving? Is the school doing everything possible to support high achievement for all its students? Directions 1. Discuss the evidence
More information2015-2016 MCOE TEACHER CREDENTIALING PROGRAM/ INDUCTION HANDBOOK
2015-2016 MCOE TEACHER CREDENTIALING PROGRAM/ INDUCTION HANDBOOK Monterey County Office of Education Leadership, Support, and Service to Prepare All Students for Success Dr. Nancy Kotowski County Superintendent
More informationTo expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction
Tool 5.1 Coaching roles Role Purpose Example Resource provider To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction Gathers information and/or resources (articles, materials, etc.) for
More informationThe Evaluation of Minnesota s School Principals DEVELOPED BY MASA, MESPA, MASSP AND BOSA FOR MINNESOTA S SCHOOL PRINCIPALS
The Evaluation of Minnesota s School Principals DEVELOPED BY MASA, MESPA, MASSP AND BOSA FOR MINNESOTA S SCHOOL PRINCIPALS The Evaluation of Minnesota s School Principals Introduction Pages 1-4 The Evaluation
More informationRUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Student Name.
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY Student Name Cohort Date This student matriculated through the following program MSA
More informationSPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Speech Language Pathologist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher
More informationChapter XXIX 29 TEACHER PERFORMANCE CERTIFIED PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS
Chapter XXIX 29 TEACHER PERFORMANCE CERTIFIED PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS Section 1. Authority. These rules and regulations are promulgated pursuant to the Wyoming Education Code of 1969 as amended, W.S.
More informationNorth Carolina School Nurse Evaluation Process
North Carolina School Nurse Evaluation Process Users Guide May 2013 Acknowledgements The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction gratefully acknowledges the School Nursing Evaluation Development
More informationPrincipal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Ohio Principal Performance Rating Rubric Principal Performance Rubric The Principal Performance Rating Rubric is intended to be scored holistically. This means that evaluators
More informationNORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Teacher: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of the
More informationModel for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional Evaluation
More informationConsulted with: Ormiston Academies Trust, ASCL, ATL, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NUT, Unison and Unite.
Policy name: Managing teacher performance - Appraisal procedure Date consulted on: September 2014 Date for review: August 2015 Author: Ormiston Academies Trust - HR department Consulted with: Ormiston
More informationGLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS
GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK All learners whether adult or child acquire the attitudes, skills and knowledge needed for
More informationEducator Evaluation Gradual Implementation Guidebook
Learning to Succeed Educator Evaluation Gradual Implementation Guidebook Version 1.0 1 Portland Public Schools * 196 Allen Avenue * Portland, Maine 04103 * Phone: (207) 874-8100 Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationTeacher Performance Appraisal. Frequently Asked Questions. Table of Contents. Classroom Observation & Pre- and Post-Observation Meetings 9
Teacher Performance Appraisal Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents TOPIC PAGE General 2 Responsibility for Conducting Appraisals 4 Frequency 5 Competency Statements 6 Annual Learning Plan 7 Scheduling
More informationDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS. EduStat Case Study. Denver Public Schools: Making Meaning of Data to Enable School Leaders to Make Human Capital Decisions
DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS EduStat Case Study Denver Public Schools: Making Meaning of Data to Enable School Leaders to Make Human Capital Decisions Nicole Wolden and Erin McMahon 7/19/2013. Title: Making Meaning
More informationTeacher Performance Evaluation Handbook
Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook Revised May, 2013 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Individuals contributing to the revision of the Bedford County Public School s Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook include:
More informationBoard of Cooperative Educational Services Rensselaer-Columbia-Greene Counties Annual Professional Performance Review
Board of Cooperative Educational Services Rensselaer-Columbia-Greene Counties Annual Professional Performance Review Classroom Teachers and Building Principals TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Part I: Criteria
More informationJames Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure
James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure James Rumsey Technical Institute, a West Virginia state institution, is bound by Policy 5310, Performance Evaluation
More informationMTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding
MTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding Table of Contents about MTSS Page # Multi-tiered systems of supports defined What are the basic components of the problem-solving
More information