Ecological Aspects of Oil Shale Processing



Similar documents
COAL, OIL SHALE, NATURAL BITUMEN, HEAVY OIL AND PEAT Vol. II -Extraction of Oil Shale: Surface and In Situ Retorting - Victor Yefimov and Shuyuan Li

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Alternative fuels in cement manufacturing

1.3 Properties of Coal

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

Physical flow accounts: principles and general concepts

AN OFFER TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DISPOSAL OF M6 PROPELLANT WASTE. Wrocław, POLAND,

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Study Plan. MASTER IN (Energy Management) (Thesis Track)

Use of Substitute Fuels in Large Combustion Plants (LCPs)

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

TERRA TEK LIMITED GUIDE TO SAMPLE HANDLING. Version 1.06

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA DIPARTIMENTO INGEGNERIA CHIMICA MATERIALI AMBIENTE

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Tutkimuksen merkitys menestyvässä liiketoiminnassa- Innovaatiosta tuotteeksi

Module No. # 02. Impact of oil and gas industry on marine environment

Holcim EMR List of EN Standards and VDI Guidelines usable for Discontinuous Measurements in Cement Plants

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

COMPARISON OF PROCESS FLOWS: FLUID BED COMBUSTOR AND GLASSPACK

Waste to Energy in Düsseldorf. for a clean city.

Welcome to NOAH and Langøya!

LCA EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF RECYCLING OF PLASTICS FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE

Environment Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plant for Sustainable Development

[]n. Craving energy. Oil and gas formation. Oil and gas formation. Resources: Fossil Fuels. Supplying our energy needs: Source of energy in the US

Yu. F. Vasyuchkov*, M. Yu. Bykova* NEW TECHNOLOGY OF GAS EXTRACTION ON THE BASE OF A COAL TO A HYDROGEN TRANSFER

THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY FROM WOOD AND OTHER SOLID BIOMASS

FURNACEPHOSPHORUS AND PHOSPHORICACID PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 52. July A private report by. the

CALL FOR OFFER. Győr Distillery Co. Ltd. (H-9027 Győr, Budai u. 7.) hereinafter referred to as Investor calls for offers in subject matter below

Development of large-scale H 2 storage and transportation technology with Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)

Energise your waste! EU legislation pushes for a reliable alternative to landfilling for residual waste. 13 th September 2011, Birmingham

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

Nonrenewable Natural Gas. Natural Gas Basics. How Was Natural Gas Formed?

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Ordinance pertaining to the recovery of waste at surface landfills (Deponieverwertungsverordnung DepVerwV) *) of 25 July 2005.

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

Advanced utilisation options for biomass gasification fly ash

Data and Trends. Environmental protection and Safety

A Low Cost Chemical Remediation Technology for Heavy Metals in Shipyard Stormwater. SBIR Topic N06 133

Material Flow Analysis

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

TRIAL CHEMICAL CLEANING OF FOULED APH BASKETS

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

Bioremediation of Petroleum Contamination. Augustine Ifelebuegu GE413

Waste a source of energy. Regional Solid Waste Management Plan Review: Engaging solutions for tomorrow. Incineration. Incineration

How To Make Calcium Carbide

GE Power & Water Water & Process Technologies. Water Treatment Solutions for Unconventional Gas

Metal Ion + EDTA Metal EDTA Complex

Eco- and water efficiency development prospects in Pulp-Board integrate.

Understanding the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Hazardous Waste Definition Exemption. Jeff Bowman, TEEX

Physical & Chemical Properties. Properties

Conventional Energy Sources

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Ash content [%] Sulphur content [%]

M.Sc. Matti Kivelä Power Plant Manager R&D Lahti Energia Oy P.O. Box 93 FIN Lahti Finland Tel matti.kivela@lahtienergia.

Cofiring of biomass in coal-fired power plants European experience Dr Colin Henderson IEA Clean Coal Centre

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

TURKISH REGULATION ON LARGE COMBUSTION PLANTS

Waste to Energy. Anders Damgaard. Thanks to Jiri Hyks and Thomas H Christensen DTU for some slides

CSP- Biomass Hybrid cogeneration system offers synergistic solution for continuous process industries. 9 th May 2013 Chennai

Introduction to Waste Treatment Technologies. Contents. Household waste

Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

Rapid Thermophilic Digestion Technology

Forgotten savings: Heat recovery from surface blowdown

Performance of the Boiler and To Improving the Boiler Efficiency Using Cfd Modeling

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

Assessing the Changes Required by the Industrial Boiler MACT Regulations

SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT. Thermal Oxidizer

MHI s Energy Efficient Flue Gas CO 2 Capture Technology and Large Scale CCS Demonstration Test at Coal-fired Power Plants in USA

Finanzierung von Erneuerbaren Energie und Energieeffizienz Projekten in Asien. INTEC Engineering GmbH Berlin,

The Economic Impacts of Reducing. Natural Gas and Electricity Use in Ontario

Hydrogen Exchange Resin. Steam Purity Analysis

Extracting Valuable Lignin for Biorefinary Production and Replacement of Fossil Fuels

BOILER OPERATORS HANDBOOK

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

Long-Term Demonstration of CO2 Recovery from the Flue Gas of a Coal-Fired Power Station

Calculate Available Heat for Natural Gas Fuel For Industrial Heating Equipment and Boilers

Coke Manufacturing. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

TABLE OF CONTENT

PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT

Amherst County Public Schools. AP Environmental Science Curriculum Pacing Guide. College Board AP Environmental Science Site

United States Progress Report on Fossil Fuel Subsidies Part 1: Identification and Analysis of Fossil Fuel Provisions

How Humans Impact the Environment. Jonathan M. Links, PhD Johns Hopkins University

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

Sewage sludge treatment with oxygen enrichement and oxyfuel combustion in CFBC - new pilot plant results

Recover Heat from Boiler Blowdown Water

Inventory of LCPs in Turkey LCP Database introductory presentation

CHAPTER 7 THE DEHYDRATION AND SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

EXAMPLE EXERCISE 4.1 Change of Physical State

Energy from waste. Introduction. Legal status of this guideline. What is energy from waste? Draft guideline

Mercedes-Benz Biodiesel Brochure

Identifying Your Hazardous Waste

Estimated emissions and CO2 savings deriving from adoption of in-place recycling techniques for road pavements

Transcription:

Abstract Ecological Aspects of Oil Shale Processing Y. Zhirjakov, Institute of Oil Shale Research Tallinn Technical University Tallinn, Estonia 26 th Oil Shale Symposium Oil shale belongs to lean and environmentally challenging fossil fuels, however, it is a mineral with high potential. Leanness of oil shale is determined by its low organic matter content (10-40%), which yields considerable amount of wastes when utilized. On the other hand, the potential of oil shale lies in the fact that the explored oil shale resources, when converted into synthetic fuel produced in thermal processing, exceed explored petroleum reserves by several times. In this case, the ecological aspects of thermal processing are imperative and should be based on the following principles, developed according to the vast experience of oil shale processing in Estonia: I Oil shale is to be processed in an integrated way with its organic and mineral components utilized at maximum efficiency. II Technology of oil shale processing is to be flexible in respect to quality of processed raw material. III Oil shale processing wastes must not cause either short-term or long-term environmental pollution. IV Consumption of natural resources (water, air, soil) used by oil shale processing is to be minimized. The ecological risks of oil shale based synthetic petroleum production can be greatly reduced when a comprehensive approach to technology selection is used. The report contains distinctive environmental features of various oil shale processing technologies. Oil shale belongs to lean and prospective fossil fuels. Leanness of oil shale is determined by its low concentration of the organic matter (10-40%), its prospectiveness, on the other hand, is determined by the fact that the explored oil shale resources expressed in tons of fuel which may be produced by their thermal processing, several times exceed the explored petroleum reserves, and besides, the availability of oil shale, i.e. its mining costs (in view of its bedding conditions) are in an average appreciably lower than the mining costs of coal. These considerations and also the expected depletion of the world petroleum reserves in the foreseeable future, inevitably makes oil shale a very prospective fossil fuel. It is especially important to date, when according to estimations made by the Center of International Strategic Investigations, the global petroleum crisis may be expected in about 40 years, to pay special attention to the ecological aspects of oil shale processing which cannot be considered as fully studied so far. In spite of numerous studies dealing with environment protection in oil shale mining, energy production based on oil shale and its thermal processing, so far there is no systematic vision on complex environmental problems in this connection. An ecologically acceptable conception of oil shale thermal processing developed at present by the Institute of oil shale Research at Tallinn Technical University includes the following basic principles: I Oil shale is to be processed in a complex way, i.e. its organic and mineral portions should be both most efficiently used. 1

II The technology of oil shale processing has to be sufficiently flexible in respect to quality of feed (in many deposits oil shale has considerably different chemical compositions of its organic and mineral portions and its calorific values even within the same deposit). III Oil shale processing wastes must not cause either short-term or prolonged pollution of environment. IV Consumption of natural resources (water, air, soil) used by oil shale processing is to be minimized. This conception, by the vision of its developers, has the hierarchy of priorities shown in Figure 1. The above hierarchy is based on the priority of development of the basic technologies over fighting the results of inadequately motivated technological decisions. An historical list of basic technologies for processing oil shale of Baltic deposit, and also technologies developed at different times in Germany, U.S.A., Canada and other countries is given in Fig. 2-6. 1. Vertical retort has no zone for semicoke gasification. 2. Vertical retort with a zone for semicoke gasification. 3. Chamber oven (similar to coke batteries). 4. Lurgi-Ruhrgas process, Chevron STB process. 5. The Galoter process with solid heat carrier. Development of best possible technology Maximum chemical and energy efficiency Maximum utilization of the resource mass Maximum variability of the technological process Environment protection from oil shale processing wastes Minimization of emissions into the environment Minimization of use of natural resources for processing Treatment of wastes to a level not causing ecological degradation of territory Figure 1: Ecological Priorities in Oil Shale Processing Figure 2: Cross section of vertical retort (no gasification of semicoke). 2

Figure 4: Cross section of the oven Figure 3: Cross section of vertical retort with zone for semicoke gasification From the point of view of ecology the above technologies may be divided into four groups according to heat carrier used, completeness of semicoke processing and the degree of thermal processing of the initial oil shale. To the first group belong the retorts having no gasification of semicoke, to the second group the retorts with gasification or afterburning of semicoke, to the third processes with deep thermal processing of oil shale, and to the fourth technologies with shale-derived Figure 5: Flow diagrams of the Lurgi- Ruhrgas and Chevron STB processes 3

Ash separator Waste heat boiler Electric filter Dry oil shale separator By-pass Aerofountain furnacecombustor To condensation system АFC AFD Heat-carrier separator Gas and oil vapors separator Dry oil shale endless screw Mixer Reactor Dust removal Oil Shale Ash tank Aerofountain dryer Semocoke Air Figure 6: The Galoter process flow diagram ash heat carrier and afterburning of the carbon of semicoke. From the technological point of view the above four groups of processes are substantially different. Nevertheless, for these processes Table 1 gives the common formulations of ecological requirements. Unfortunately, to date there are no adequate data at our disposal to make a systematic analysis of all the said technologies according to the above criteria, a qualitative appraisal according to some of the general chemical data is still possible. The following qualitative diagram (Fig. 7) presents an integrated ecological appraisal of oil shale processing technologies according to concentrations of oil, carbon, salts in aqueous leaching of the solid wastes. Darkness of shade in the diagram shows increased concentration of the component. It may be seen in the Table 1: Ecological assessment criteria for oil shale processing technologies 1. The quantity of wastes produced by the process (solid, liquid, gaseous). 2. and hazard class of the harmful substances contained in wastes produced. 3. Ecological mobility of elements contained in wastes. 4. Availability of practical methods of environment protection from harmful substances contained in wastes. 5. Consumption of natural resources (water, air, soil) for processing technologies. 4

Properties of solid wastes Technologies of shale oil of carbon (TOC) Chemical mobility of elements of the mineral portion Vertical retorts (no gasification of semicoke) Chamber ovens Vertical retorts with gasification of semicoke The Galoter process (with solid heat carrier) Figure 7: Ecology of oil shale processing diagram that the maximum possible emission of organic components extracted from the solid wastes takes place when oil shale is processed by the retorts having no gasification of semicoke and the minimum may be observed in case of afterburning of semicoke with solid heat carrier. At the same time the solid wastes produced by the retorting processes having no zone for semicoke gasification and the oven coke (char) exhibit the highest concentration of carbon which indirectly indicates to the presence of polyaromatic compounds in the solid waste which belong to most hazardous environmental polluters. At the same time, afterburning of semicoke by technologies with solid heat carrier leads to increased chemical mobility of elements of the mineral portion of oil shale. If oil shale has a high concentration of heavy metals and especially that of radioactive elements in its mineral portion, afterburning of semicoke may be connected with high ecological risks. Ecologically favorable processing of oil shale is accomplished in vertical retorts with gasification of semicoke. However, running 5

of such retorts proved technically difficult which led to closing of this type of retorts operated at that time in Estonia. The arrow in the diagram indicates the presence of the optimum qualitative properties of solid wastes produced by oil shale processing. During 2001-2006 solid wastes produced by vertical internally heated retorts and by processing technology with solid heat carrier were studied by TTU Institute of Oil Shale Research to reveal their conformity with the above criteria, but also the possibilities of improving the vertical retort technology for conditioning their solid wastes according to European requirements. The results of these studies are given in Table 1 and Table 2. A comparative analysis indicates that the concentration of total organic carbon of the semicoke produced by vertical retorts several times exceeds the concentration of total organic carbon (TOC) of the ash produced by the process with solid heat carrier, besides if the vertical retort is operated according to the technological chart i. e. no air and gas is injected into the additional, the concentration of oil in the semicoke exceeds 700 mg/kg. Conclusions: 1. The accelerated development of oil shale processing in the future is possible if the requirements for ecological safety are met. 2. The ecological safety should be based on the development of technological methods ensuring complex utilization of oil shale resources. 3. From the point of view of international Table 2: Results of experiments in vertical retort No gas injected into additional Gas injected into additional Air and steam injected into additional Air and gas injected into additional Run no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Date 09.07 13.08 21.08 10.07 11.07 12.07 24.07 14.08 16.08 22.08 24.08 Oil 0.74 0.79 0.70 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.51 0.00 0.10 0.50 0.00 Semicoke 96.60 97.32 95.70 95.52 96.03 96.18 94.27 97.29 95.13 95.88 95.85 Water 1.10 1.28 2.09 2.85 2.94 2.72 3.07 2.11 2.83 2.70 3.10 Gas + losses 1.57 0.61 1.51 1.61 1.01 1.02 2.15 0.60 1.94 0.91 1.04 Gas, m3/t 9.46 5.73 8.70 13.07 7.94 8.76 10.17 5.61 4.96 12.66 2.33 Analytical 0.98 1.56 0.73 2.91 0.76 0.49 2.2 0.81 2.13 0.92 4.02 moisture, % Carbonchioxide 11.62 6.85 6.48 6.39 6.54 7.90 7.17 9.02 5.12 7.95 7.47 (CO2)d, % Ash, % 71.04 83.68 87.86 81.06 81.20 82.40 81.55 82.10 86.58 78.96 84.26 Organic matter, % Total organic carbon (TOC), % Total sulphur, % Calorific value, kcal/kg 17.34 9.83 5.66 12.55 12.26 9.7 11.28 8.88 8.30 13.09 8.25 3.270 3.550 3.040 2.710 2.400 2.490 3.230 1.950 1.260 2.490 0.980 1.56 1.97 2.41 2.38 1.70 2.20 2.05 2.78 428 411 208 286 226 235 362 6

Table 3: of hazardous substances in ash from the Galoter process Safe storage of solid wastes Specified by Council Directive 1999/31/EC Ash from ash cyclones of the Galoter process ISO Inert Hazardous Runs with oil shale Runs with oil shale and rubber in solid wastes % wt in aqueous eluates of solid wastes Total organic carbon, TOC 8245-1999 11) 31) 0.75 1.0 1.0 1.5 Total sulphur, Sdt EVS 664:1995 Not specified Sulphide sulfur, Sds EVS 664:1995 Not specified) Not specified Not specified 1.57-2.41 1.66-1.99 0.78-1.49 0.99-1.32 ph, (-lg[h + ]) DP-10523 4.0-13.0 4.0-13.0 12.50-12.94 12.80-12.98 TOC, mg/l 8245-1999 200 40-200 80-170 75-180 Phenols, mg/l 6439-1990 10.0 20-100 1.96-6.80 1.96-6.20 Sulphetes, g/l DIS-9280-1 1,0 0.2-1.0 0.368-1.22 0.402-0.938 Chlorides, g/l DIS-9297 0.5 1.6-6.0 0.14 0.14 Ammonium, mgn/l 7150-1983 50.0 0.2-1.0г/л 1.97 1.81 Nitrites, mg/l 6777-1983 3.0 6.0-30.0 0.021 0.2 Easily extractable cyanides, mg/l 38405-D14-88 0.1 0.2-1.0 Not detected Not detected Fluorides, mg/l DP-10359-1 <5 10-50 Heavy metals mg/l Pb 8288-1985 0.4-2.0 0.138-1.453 1.064-1.372 Cd 8289-1985 Total 0.1-0.5 0.014-0.093 Cu 8288-1985 content of 0.1-0.5 0.0-0.044 metals, Zn 5666-1/3-89 2.0-10.0 0.046-0.475 0.058-0.085 5 mg/l 0.277-0.612 0.0-0.472 Cr+6 DIS-9174-88 0.1-0.5 Crtotal Crtotal ecological requirements, the future oil shale processing technologies providing deep conversion or afterburning of carbon and the organic mass of semicoke may be regarded as acceptable to date. As such processes may be considered those with solid heat carrier and vertical retorts with semicoke gasification. 4. Take into account that solid heat carrier process is more flexible in technological aspects, compare with vertical retort, the best available technology now is solid heat carrier process. 5. To provide systematic approach to the solution of problems of oil shale processing international cooperation in technological and ecological fields is needed. 7