Prepared by: Kate Tarrant Prepared February 3, 2015



Similar documents
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

HRM. Human Resource Management Rapid Assessment Tool. A Guide for Strengthening HRM Systems. for Health Organizations. 3rd edition

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)

Standards for School Counseling

Framework for Leadership

Competencies. The Children s Program Administrator Credential of NewYork State. Topic 1: Administering Children s Programs

Florida Core Competencies for Early Care and Education Directors. February 2011

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program

The Pyramid Model provides guidance for early childhood special education and early intervention personnel, early educators, families, and other

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

HRM. Human Resource. Health Organizations. A Guide for Strengthening HRM Systems. Management Rapid Assessment Tool for

Leadership Competency Self Assessment

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION SCALE

Program Administrator Definition and Competencies

Superintendent Effectiveness Rubric*

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

JOB DESCRIPTION PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION. TEACHERS 3033 Master Teacher Early Childhood Education Page 1 of 7

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

Georgia District Performance Standards

DELAWARE COMPETENCIES for EARLY CHILDHOOD PROFESSIONALS

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

A Guide for. Families. Using NAEYC Standards to Find Quality Programs for Young Children.

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

Glossary for the Arizona Professional School Counselor Evaluation

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF February 3, 2015 UPDATE AS OF 4:30 PM

Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders

The Family Services Manager s Handbook

Competency Requirements for Executive Director Candidates

Masters of Reading Information Booklet. College of Education

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Early Childhood Educator (Certificate III)

Educational Practices REFERENCE GUIDE. Aligned to the AdvancED Standards for Quality Schools

School Counselor (501)

Lifestreams Christian Church (LCC) Child Care Centre. Educator/Staff Performance Management Policy

How To Be A Successful Supervisor

JULY 1, 2010 JUNE 30, 2013 STRATEGIC PLAN

Submitted for Review and Approval Florida Department of Education 5/1/2012

Program Quality Self-Assessment (QSA) Tool Planning for Ongoing Program Improvement

NAEYC. Infant 0-15 months 1:4. Toddler months 1: months 1:6. Preschool months 1: months 1:10. Schoolage 5 15 years 1:12

HUMAN SERVICES MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES

PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001

DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TUTORING AND ACADEMIC SKILLS CENTER (TASC) AND SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION (SI) BASIC FUNCTION

How To Understand Organizational Power And Politics

SBEC/TExES Framework for Principal Certification

Community Policing. Defined

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals

Expanded Teaching Staff Survey For use in Step 1: Enrollment/Self-Study Only Page 1 of 8

Human Resources Service Delivery Initiative Findings and Recommendations. Campus Update. November 2014

*Performance Expectations, Elements and Indicators

*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

Tulsa Public Schools District School Counseling Program Elementary

Approved by the Virginia Board of Education on September 27, Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia

Human Resources Management Program Standard

Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

The school principal practices effective cultural leadership when he or she

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists

Division of Human Resources. Strategic Plan For a Culture of Excellence

New York State Professional Development Standards (PDF/Word) New York State. Professional Development Standards. An Introduction

Ohio Standards for School Counselors

Master of Science in Early Childhood Education Singapore,

After School & Out of School Time Programs QRIS Application & Self Assessment

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

Colorado s P-3 Professional Development System 3-Year Plan

Lillian Tsosie-Jensen School Counseling, Equity, and Prevention Coordinator

Elementary and Middle School Technology Curriculum Guidelines

Tulsa Public Schools District Secondary School Counseling Program

North Carolina. Teacher Working Conditions Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Commission

Job Description / Performance Evaluation ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF NURSING

HUMAN RESOURCES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION Where are we? Where should we be? Where HR Divisions should be. Where most HR Divisions are

Master of Arts in Educational Administration, Principal Endorsement Program Course Sequence and Descriptions

Rhode Island Department of Education 255 Westminster Street Providence, Rhode Island 02903

Self-Assessment for Administrators of Child Care Programs

Model for Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services

Montana School Counseling Program

Additional Qualification Course Guideline. Primary Education Specialist

Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership

B408 Human Resource Management MTCU code Program Learning Outcomes

Director of Facilities Management

JOB DESCRIPTION PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION. TEACHERS 3034 Lead Teacher Page 1 of 8

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

The Johns Hopkins University Human Resources Competency Dictionary

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors

Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership

Would I Follow Me? An Introduction to Management Leadership in the Workplace

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses

Transcription:

STATE POLICY TO PROMOTE EFFECTIVE TEACHING AND LEARNING Discussion Guide: In What Ways do Teaching Condition Support Effective Teachers? Prepared by: Kate Tarrant Prepared February 3, 2015 Please note that this is an initial draft. In the coming months we intend to engage the authors of the tools that we included in this crosswalk in our work as we bring greater attention to policies that impact teaching conditions. We intend to conduct a deeper review and an analysis of the key issues and specific actions that can improve the conditions the impact early childhood teaching This paper is designed to be a starting point for a discussion about ways to design policy to better support the context that surrounds teachers. Our aim is to encourage policymakers to consider the ways that conditions may help or hinder teachers capacity to implement best teaching practices that will result in significant outcomes for children in their care. To that end, we have reviewed five teaching conditions frameworks that are currently informing early childhood or public school sector reforms: 1 1. Early Childhood Work Environment Survey (ECWES): A tool used to measure the organizational climate on 10 dimensions based on the collective perceptions of the quality of work life for staff. 2. Program Administration Scale (PAS): An assessment tool to examine an early childhood program s compliance with leadership and management practices. 3. Supportive Environmental Quality Underlying Adult Learning in Early Childhood Settings (SEQUAL): A multi- purpose validated tool for examining and improving environments in which early childhood teaching staff work and learn. The SEQUAL Identifies the domains of the work environment that influence teachers practice and assesses how well the workplace supports teaching staff to learn and to continue to develop their knowledge and skills on the job. It is administered directly to teachers and assistant teachers in centers or school- based programs and brings their voice into quality improvement planning process. Program leaders also complete information about their center characteristics and teaching staff through an online tool. 4. Teaching Conditions Standards: The New Teacher Center developed the Teaching Conditions Standards and an associated on- line survey to improve the context of teaching in states and communities across the country. The standards survey has been validated to show a positive association between teaching conditions and student achievement as well as teacher retention. 1 Many tools address the related areas of teaching conditions, school climate, and work environment and it should be carefully noted that this work is a starting point for a more comprehensive review and critical analysis of existing tools that communities are using to improve teaching conditions. 1

5. The Five Essential Supports Framework for Early Childhood Education: The Consortium on Chicago School Research has investigated successful public schools and identified five characteristics of schools that improve student learning. Recently, they have adapted the 5 Essentials to apply to early childhood education programs. As we looked across these five resources that address teaching conditions, we generated two tables that we hope will provoke discussion and a critical examination of current policies and practices: Table 1. Early Childhood Teaching Conditions and Key Questions for Policymakers describes the dimensions that we determined to transcend each tool based on the crosswalk presented in Table 2. We describe each dimension and then pose numerous questions that can provoke critical thinking about the way that existing policy structures support each dimension. Table 2. Crosswalk of Teaching Conditions Frameworks provides a very basic comparison of the five tools at a broad level to showcase some commonalities and differences in the ways that the tools address and describe teaching conditions and the context of teaching. It is important to note that the first three tools we selected have been developed for an early childhood context and the fourth and fifth tools were developed for a public school K- 12 context. Whether an early childhood program is located in a public school or community- based organization can shape the nature and importance of the features. Specifically, the features related to adult wellbeing and rewards are especially important in community- based organizations where compensation is highly uneven and teachers are not typically represented by labor unions. In contrast, public school based early childhood programs often need to attend more to family and community partnerships to be successful. As this project evolves and develops, we intend to do a more comprehensive, thorough, and analytical review of frameworks and research that address teaching conditions. Based on the more detailed analyses, we will investigate possible gaps (e.g., cultural competence) and trends (e.g., detailed information curriculum implementation). We will also explore, the rationales and research for the different aspects of teaching conditions and how they function across different early childhood contexts. 2

Table 1. Early Childhood Teaching Conditions and Key Questions for Policymakers The following table describes common dimensions of teaching conditions and then poses numerous questions for policymakers that can provoke critical thinking about the way that existing policy structures support effective teaching. Conditions The Vision Key Questions 1. Teaching and Instruction Teachers qualifications and experience fit the developmental and cultural needs of their students. How are institutions of higher education preparing teachers to use instructional tools so that they maximize students learning? Teachers instructional decisions are informed by the developmental needs, culture, and life experience of their students. How are teachers use of curriculum, assessments, and early learning standards integrated into the states early childhood quality improvement and accountability structures? Teachers have the resources and support to implement curricula and assessment tools to meet appropriate learning standards. Are recommended instructional tools aligned and complementary so that teachers have a coherent, developmentally, and culturally Teaching teams are thoughtfully hired and supported as they appropriate approach to instruction? collaborate to teach their students. How do curricula pacing and assessment demands support effective teaching and maximize student learning? How do existing teaching credentials reinforce effective teaching and instruction? 2. Time for Planning and Collaboration Teachers have sufficient time built into their schedules for planning individually and in collaboration with their peers. The daily schedule and curriculum pacing is structured to give teachers uninterrupted instructional time so that they can engage their students in deep exploration of new content and thinking skills. 3. Teacher Leadership Teachers are given sufficient flexibility and support to respond to their particular students developmental needs and make the moment- to- moment decisions to individualize instruction. Teachers are encouraged to take initiative and work collaboratively to customize instruction. Do teachers have sufficient paid time to work individually and with their peers to plan and engage in professional learning? How do administrative responsibilities impact teachers time for planning and working with colleagues? How are daily schedules structured to minimize interruptions in the class time so that children and teachers can engage in rich learning activities? How are institutions of higher education preparing teachers to work in collaboration with their peers to be responsive to their children s learning needs, culture, and life experiences? How are program leaders encouraged to give teachers autonomy and leadership opportunities within their programs? How are leaders encouraged to treat teachers equitably and professionally? 3

4. Professional Learning Professional development opportunities are designed to encourage teachers to engage in reflection and ongoing continuous quality improvement in collaboration with their peers. 5. Adult Well- being Teachers receive equitably, stable, and sufficient compensation wages and benefits (e.g., paid sick time and health insurance) to support their overall wellbeing. 6. Leadership Leaders manage their programs to encourage all staff to participate in ongoing quality improvement by actively engaging in staff development. Programs have sustainable funding to support a positive work environment geared toward collaborative professional growth. 7. Family and Community Partnerships Programs include families in instructional practices so they can reinforce learning at home. Transitions for children are supported through partnerships between community- based early childhood programs and public schools. Schools engage families as partners in their children s education and treat them respectfully and equitably. How is the professional development system shifting to support communities of practice? What structures are in place for program staff to work toward continuous quality improvement? How is job embedded professional development and the use of focused professional learning communities supported through accountability systems? How does early childhood education financing support equitable, stable, and sufficient teacher compensation? Is compensation built into program quality improvement practices and program accountability structures? How are institutions of higher education preparing teachers to assume leadership roles in the field? How do workforce policies encourage program leaders to have sufficient understanding of early childhood practices as well as the management experience to operate a viable program? In what ways do program leaders receive job- embedded professional development that is responsive to programs strengths and areas for improvement? How do accountability structures incorporate the strategies that teachers and leaders use to involve families in their children s learning and development? Do communities have structures in place to facilitate collaboration between early childhood programs and public schools? 4

Table 2. Crosswalk of Teaching Conditions Frameworks The following table provides a basic crosswalk of five tools/frameworks that explain early childhood teaching conditions. We looked across the tools to identify common dimensions that are included in the first column of the table and then input content from each tool that related to the common dimension. Tools Purpose/Use ECWES: Early Childhood Work Environment Survey (10 Domains) Assesses the perspectives of all program staff about the quality of the work environment. 1. Teaching and Instruction Task Orientation: The emphasis placed on organizational effectiveness and efficiency, including productive meetings, program outcomes, and accountability. PAS: Program Administration Scale (10 Domains) Assesses the measurable leadership and administrative practices of an early childhood program. Child Assessment: Examines the availability of screening procedures to assist with the identification of children with special needs, the type and frequency of child assessment to determine learning and developmental outcomes, and whether the results of child assessments are used in lesson planning. Staff Qualifications: Considers the level of general education, specialized training, and job experience of the administrator and members of the teaching staff. SEQUAL: Supportive Environmental Quality Underlying Adult Learning in Early Childhood Settings (5 Domains) Provides teaching staff assessment of how well the workplace supports teaching staff to learn and to continue to develop their knowledge and skills on the job. Teaching Supports: Explores whether teaching staff are trained and receive ongoing guidance on how to use their program s curriculum and child observation and assessment frameworks in their classroom teaching; assesses whether there are sufficient levels of trained staff in all classrooms to meet children s needs. Teaching Conditions Standards (7 Domains) A framework that is used to evaluate public school system performance in some localities and states. Instructional Practices and Support a) Teachers use formative and summative assessment data to drive instructional practice. b) Teachers are supported to work collaboratively to develop, align, and improve instructional practices. c) Teachers are assigned classes that maximize their likelihood of success with students. 5 Essential Supports Framework for Early Childhood Education (5 Domains) A framework that highlights the features of successful schools which is used to inform metrics that evaluate public school performance in some localities Ambitious Instruction An instructional guidance system articulates the what and how of teaching and learning for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. 5

2. Time for Collaboration and Planning 3. Teacher Leadership Decision- making: The degree of autonomy given to staff and the extent to which they are involved in making center- wide decisions. 4. Professional Learning Professional Growth: The degree of emphasis placed on staff s professional growth. The availability of opportunities to increase professional competence. Personnel Cost and Allocation: Looks at whether the organization has a written salary scale and annual salary increases, the type and availability of fringe benefits, whether children are regrouped during the day to maintain ratios, and the availability of paid planning time for teaching staff. Human Resources Development: Assesses whether the program provides an orientation for new staff, ongoing staff development, regular opportunities for supervision and support, and systematic performance appraisal. Teaching Supports: Sufficient staffing levels and patterns that allow teaching staff to complete their professional duties (e.g. planning, reporting); availability of trained substitutes or floaters; provision of paid planning time without responsibility for children; and management of staff turnover. Job Crafting: Explores whether teaching staff work well as a team and share responsibilities. Job Crafting : Explores whether teaching staff are well- informed about program policies and involved in decisions about program and classroom policies (e.g., ability to adjust classroom schedule, input into staff meeting agendas). Learning Community: Explores opportunities for teaching staff to learn and improve their teaching, including observing other teachers, trying new teaching approaches, and sharing ideas with other teaching staff. Time Available time to plan, collaborate, provide instruction, and eliminate barriers to maximize instructional time during the school day a) Teachers class sizes facilitate high quality instruction. b) Teachers have sufficient time to provide all students with effective instruction. c) Teachers have time during the school day to plan and collaborate. d) Schools make efforts to streamline processes Teacher Leadership a) Teachers demonstrate leadership in the classroom. b) Teachers demonstrate leadership in the school. c) Schools have efficient and effective decision- making processes that engage teachers. Professional Development a) Time and resources are provided for professional development, ensuring all teachers have access to continuous learning opportunities. Professional Capacity Building Through Collaborative Learning Routines Leaders use supervisory resources, performance feedback, professional development, and social resources within 6

Collegiality: The extent to which staff are friendly, supportive, and trusting of one another. The peer cohesion and esprit de corps of the group. 5. Adult Well- being Reward System: The degree of fairness and equity in the distribution of pay, fringe benefits, and opportunities for advancement. 6. Leadership Personnel Cost and Allocation: Looks at whether the organization has a written salary scale and annual salary increases, the type and availability of fringe benefits, whether children are regrouped during the day to maintain ratios, and the availability of paid planning time for teaching staff. Adult Well- being: Explores teaching staff perceptions about program policies and practices that support their economic, physical, and emotional well- being. Explores teaching staff level of worry about policies such as being sent home without pay if child attendance is low or for an unexpected closure (e.g., bad weather) and degree they can depend on policies such as payment for required meetings and availability of substitutes. Adult well- being also explores teaching staff level of worry about their own economic well- being (e.g., having enough to pay for housing costs and monthly expenses) and quality of work life (e.g., fair treatment and respect for different points of view among coworkers). b) Professional development meets best practice standards for delivery and support. c) Professional development enhances the ability of teachers to implement instructional strategies and improve student learning. the staff to build professional capacity. Supervisor Support: The Program Leadership: Explores School Leadership: An atmosphere Inclusive Leadership: Leaders 7

degree of facilitative leadership providing encouragement, support, and clear expectations. 7. Family and Community Partnerships 8. Physical Space Physical Setting: The extent to which the spatial Family Partnerships: Examines the type and frequency of communication with parents, their level of involvement in center activities and decision making, and the degree of support the center provides to parents from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Center Operations: Considers the health and safety of the facility, teaching staff perceptions of how supervisors and program leaders interact with staff to support their teaching practice, professional growth, and well- being (e.g., supervisors meet regularly with staff to discuss their teaching, encourages professional development, and treats staff equitably). Teaching Supports: Explores teaching staff perceptions about support services to help teachers meet the needs of children and families in their classrooms (e.g., resources are available to find outside help if a problem with a child or family is identified, training is available for staff about teaching children with challenging behaviors). Teaching Supports Explores teaching staff perceptions about of trust and mutual respect is pervasive in the school. a) Teachers performance is assessed objectively and effective feedback is provided that improves performance and enhances student learning. b) School leadership articulates a vision and implements effective strategies for school improvement. c) School leadership makes sustained efforts to improve teaching and learning conditions. Community Support and Involvement: a) Parents, guardians, and community members support the teachers at the school. b) Parents, guardians, and community members are knowledgeable about classroom and school policies and practices. c) Parents, guardians, and community members are provided opportunities to influence the success of the school. Facilities and Resources: Availability of instructional, establish a strategic focus on children s health, learning, development and school readiness, and they support teachers to be effective in their work. Strong Ties and Partnerships among Families, School, and Communities: Children do not exist alone; they are members of a family that lives within a community. Child- Centered Supportive Learning Climate: All adults in 8

9. Planning arrangement of the center helps or hinders staff in carrying out their responsibilities. The availability of supplies and materials. Clarity: The extent to which policies, procedures, and responsibilities are clearly defined and communicated. Goal consensus: The extent to which staff agree on the philosophy, goals, and educational objectives of the center. whether the center has a risk management plan, the adequacy of the space to meet the needs of staff, and the frequency and quality of internal communications, including shared leadership at staff meetings and conflict resolution. Technology: Looks at the center s technological resources, how technology is used by administrative and teaching staff, and whether the center has clear policies and procedures regarding the appropriate use of technology at work and the confidentiality of work- related information. Program Planning and Evaluation: Assesses whether the center has a written mission and vision statement, engages in strategic planning, and involves staff and parents in evaluating program practices. materials that help staff teach effectively (e.g., equipment and materials are appropriate for the children, teaching staff have access to current, professional materials about early childhood education). Adult Well- being Explores teaching staff perceptions about policies to prevent injury, illness, and support good health (e.g., program provides adult- size equipment and space away from children for breaks). technology, office, communication, and school resources to teachers a) Materials and resources are provided for teachers to deliver quality instruction. b) Technology facilitates 21 st Century learning opportunities. c) Physical environments support teaching and learning. d) Teachers have access to a broad range of Professional Support Personnel. the school community create physical environments, a daily structure, and an emotional climate that enables children to consistently feel safe, liked, able to actively explore, and competent in their approaches to learning. Innovativeness: The extent to which the center adapts and encourages staff to find creative ways to solve problems. 9

10. Operations Fiscal Management: Looks at he director s role in the annual budget planning process, if payroll and other expenses are paid in a timely manner, and if standards accounting procedures are adhered to. Marketing and Public Relations: Evaluates the type and frequency of different external communication tools, how responsive the center is to the needs of the neighborhood or local community, and the administrator s involvement in early childhood professional organizations, as well as local civic, business, or faith- based organizations. Managing Student Conduct a) School leadership and teachers develop and communicate policies and procedures regarding student conduct and school safety. b) Administrators and teachers enforce policies and procedures regarding student conduct and school safety consistently. 10