1. ABSTRACT PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS



Similar documents
THE TOP TEN PERCENT: Targeting the Top Ten Percent of Pawners

Georgia State University Police Department Operation Clean Sweep

Austin Police Department Annual Crime and Traffic Report: 2013 Preliminary Report

Preventing Burglaries

Department of Police SOUTHINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06489

Local Police Departments, 2007

East Haven Police Department

NSW POLICE FORCE. Home Safe

d CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 5 Spring 2015

State of Illinois Department of Central Management Services ACTION PLAN FOR NOTIFICATION OF A SECURITY BREACH

Q. Officer, I am placing a copy of your department report face down in front of you.

Collection and Use of the Motor Vehicle Law Enforcement Fee

Victimization by Credit Card Fraud and Identity Theft in Kentucky 2008

Identity Theft Victims In Indiana

AUTO THEFT PREVENTION HANDBOOK ST. LOUIS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS. Important Numbers 2. Auto Theft Statistics 3

Standardizing the Collection, Analysis and Dissemination. of Motor Vehicle Theft Intelligence. Sgt Rich Smith. Colorado State Patrol

City of Phoenix. False Alarm Reduction Plan

A Profile of the Northeast Metro Auto Theft Task Force (NEMAT)

Frequently Asked Questions

TASK LIST UTILITIES SERVICE INVESTIGATOR (CLASS CODE 1631)

EXAMINEE: Johnjay Portillo EXAM DATE: January 22, 2011 EXAM TYPE: Specific Issue: Tampering with a Government Document

8 Interpreting Crime Data and Statistics

azag.gov PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST IDENTITY THEFT Office of Arizona Attorney General TERRY GODDARD For more information, contact:

Crime Prevention Tips

CRIME IN MOBILE HOME COMMUNITIES IN DURHAM, NC

Austin Police Department Annual Crime and Traffic Report: 2008

Social Media Use in Law Enforcement:

Florida's Identity Theft Victim Kit

BEVERLY HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT OCTOBER 2014

Crime in Missouri 2012

APARTMENT MANAGERS' HOTLINE PRCHiKAM. Abstract. The Colorado Springs Police Department has policed with the Community

Pasco County Sheriff's Office Economic Crime Unit. Identity Theft Guide

New Cars Buying from a Licensed Dealer New Vehicle Warranty Florida s New Car Lemon Law

Identity Theft Prevention Presented by: Matt Malone Assero Security

Effectiveness and Cost Efficiency of DNA Evidence in Volume Crime Denver Colorado Site Summary

Prince William County Police Department 2013 Crime Report

Palm Beach County Sheriff s Office

PRESCOTT POLICE DEPARTMENT

Arrests/Convictions/IFBs. First Half The Insurance Frauds Bureau posted 215 arrests during the first half of 2013.

JERRY SANDERS. July 20, Mr. John Lusardi Police Executive Research Forum 1120 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 930 Washington DC,

The FBI Uniform Crime Report definition of Part 1 crime also includes arson, but for the purposes of this analysis it has been excluded.

Community Policing. Defined

The Department of Justice

Problem: Once the students have obtained the results, they writeup a summary report describing:

Crime Location Crime Type Month Year Betting Shop Criminal Damage April 2010 Betting Shop Theft April 2010 Betting Shop Assault April 2010

CITY OF UNALASKA. Position Description

Why Avoiding LegalShield At Your Company Could Be Expensive For Your Business!

Lawrence Police Department Administrative Policy. August 2013

P f in.com

INTRODUCTION. Identity Theft Crime Victim Assistance Kit

PERSONAL INJURY FACT BOOK

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CIVILIAN VOLUNTEER APPLICATION -OFFICE USE ONLY

Safety & Security October 2015

OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION

Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland

Identity Theft Trends

An Emerging Sector in Law Enforcement Volunteering: Volunteers in Investigations

Bruce A. Lohr Cape Hill Court. Hampstead, MD (443) Professional Experience

Eastern University Esperanza college 4261 N. 5th Street, Philadelphia, PA CAMPUS SAFETY AND SECURITY REPORT:

Toronto Police Service Service Level Review

April 16th, By John Tabor Corporate Security Director National Retail Systems Inc.

Benefits of LifeLock Ultimate Plus. About LifeLock. 3 Layers of Protection DETECT ALERT RESTORE FACT SHEET LIFELOCK ULTIMATE PLUS

19. Injury, Accident, and Loss Reporting

GIS AT WORK IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

FTC Facts. For Consumers Federal Trade Commission. Maybe you never opened that account, but. Identity Crisis... What to Do If Your Identity is Stolen

ACTION PLAN FOR VICTIMS OF IDENTITY THEFT

Citi Identity Theft Solutions

Auto Theft Tracking Program Bait Car (ATTP)

Questions you should ask before hiring a criminal defense lawyer

PROTECTING YOURSELF FROM IDENTITY THEFT. The Office of the Attorney General of Maryland Identity Theft Unit

CRIMINAL ID THEFT: Taking the First Steps to Resolve It

" We appreciate your time, energy and enthusiasm. I truly believe that a sense of security

Executive Director s Message. $4.7 million. Amount of allocated funds for FY 2015 for Victim Service grants.

Global Security Group LLC. Application

Taking a Bite Out of Crime: 46 Years of Utah Crime Statistics

Montgomery County Crime Report 2014

The Illinois Uniform Crime Reporting Program

Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act Compliance

Arrests in Wisconsin 2010

RECURRENT FLIGHT SCHOOL SECURITY AWARENESS (FSSA) TRAINING

FLIP IDENTITY THEFT. (Financial Literacy in Practice) February 2015 OVERVIEW TEACHER NOTES TEACHER NOTES

THE DISTURBING TRUTH

Key Crime Analysis Data Sources. Crime

LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL C.T.I.P. TASKFORCE

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS

EMMET COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE Law Enforcement Division ANNUAL REPORT 2010

The California State University Office of the Chancellor

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

Western Kentucky University, The Center. The Michael Minger Act Report for 2015 Activity Reported for Calendar Year 2014

Body/Repair Shop Visits to Determine Distribution of Replacement Parts Sources

NOAA Records Schedule Series Chapter: 900 Facility Security and Safety Files

Pensacola Police Department

TROY POLICE DEPARTMENT MERCHANTS GUIDE BAD CHECKS Page 1 of 13

York County DUI Prevention Initiative

Irvine Police Victim Advocate s Office

APPENDIX U NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Page 1 of 6

FLEET ROAD RISK POLICY

Bio Summary and CV. curriculum vitae of John C. Villines; Introduction; page 1 of 5 (rev Jan 2013)

Appendix A. CAR Special Investigative Units Standards

Transcription:

1. ABSTRACT PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS SCANNING - Assistant Chief Paul Felice of the Glendale, Arizona Police Department initiated a problem-solving project with the department's Community Action Team (CAT) after a car, which was stolen from a new car dealership, was used in a bank robbery. After this incident, it was learned that several car dealerships were experiencing numerous thefts of automobiles. ANALYSIS - The CAT members interviewed auto theft detectives, car dealership owners and employees, reviewed police reports, reviewed dealership policies and procedures, analyzed crime statistics and contacted insurance companies about this problem. As part of the researching and identifying the problem, Officers observed and monitored the safety procedures used by the business and employees. RESPONSE - As a result of the problem-solving analysis, the CAT members created the Theft Reduction Auto Program (T.R.A.P.) to pro-actively address the problem. Working with the dealerships, the Police Department trained employees on crime prevention, conducted a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) analysis of the properties, and helped the dealership owners and managers establish numerous procedures to aid them in such security related matters ranging from hiring to test-driving procedures to inventory control. ASSESSMENT - Since the implementation of T.R.A.P., participating dealerships have seen a sharp decline in the number of auto thefts. In 1995, 44 cars stolen from the dealerships. In 1996, the number of stolen vehicles declined to 35 and as of July 1997, only 11 vehicles have been reported stolen.

2. DESCRIPTION A. SCANNING During the summer of 1995, an incident occurred in where a vehicle was stolen from a car dealership in Glendale, Arizona. The vehicle was then used in an armed bank robbery. During the investigation of this crime, it was discovered the reporting procedures for stolen vehicles from the dealership were inadequate. The Assistant Chief of the Glendale Police Department contacted one of the department's three Community Action Teams (CAT) and asked the team members to develop a pro-active program to effectively address the problem areas at Glendale dealerships. Glendale Police Chief David Dobrotka created the proactive problem-solving CAT unit in 1994. prevention specialist. The teams comprised of a police officer and a civilian crime The teams work on a variety of neighborhood and business problems in their assigned geographic sectors within the city. As the CAT members began to investigate and research the project more fully, it became apparent that the problem of stolen vehicles from the car dealerships was one of several problems that needed to be addressed. Upon checking with detectives and the car dealerships, there was not only substantial financial losses to the businesses and community, but employees were also at risk due to inadequate employee safety measures. Due to the scope of this problem (financial loss, calls for police service, increased insurance rates due to the high dollar amount in losses, and risk to employees), the CAT

members put together a pro-active problem solving program called the Theft Reduction Auto Program (T.R. A.P.).

B. ANALYSIS The City of Glendale has an auto dealership section in the city which runs for approximately one mile on Glendale's name sake street, near downtown Glendale. There are eight new automobile dealerships and many used-car dealerships. This strip of dealerships has been in existence in Glendale for more than thirty years and provides a large tax base for the city. The car theft problem was analyzed using several procedures. First, research was conducted regarding Arizona auto theft statistics. In 1995, Arizona had one of the highest auto theft rates per capita in the country. According to the National Insurance Crime Bureau, auto dealerships nationwide are the victims of organized auto-theft and auto-parts rings. In Glendale, there were more than 45 new cars stolen from auto dealerships in 1995. This represents a large problem for our community of 182,000 people. Also in 1995, an auto parts theft ring that included employees from two dealerships was broken up and the suspects arrested. The cost to the community was more than $250,000 paid out by the auto dealers as thousands of work hours were being spent by Glendale Police and Arizona Department of Motor Vehicle personnel. Dealership Security and Reporting Procedures The reporting procedures utilized by the car dealerships were thoroughly researched by the CAT personnel. It was determined during this analysis phase that the dealerships did not have sufficient inventory control for the vehicles on their lots. In

addition, there did not appear to be any security measures in place to deter auto thefts. Dressed as civilians, the CAT personnel tested two different dealerships for vehicle and office security. The officers were able to gain access to the business offices, tamper with the computer system and remove personal property. In addition, the officers had little problem removing six vehicles from the lots without checking with any employees or having any record of them missing. They also wandered unquestioned through private offices in the buildings. After talking with employees, sales managers and business owners, it was determined that there were no uniform policies or procedures in place for the automotive industry addressing security issues. Sales personnel at some dealerships would allow potential customers to test drive vehicles without requiring adequate identification and vehicles while other dealerships loaned out cars without necessary controls. It was discovered that reporting procedures for stolen vehicles was neither timely nor efficient. The Police Department only received calls from the dealerships when they conducted their annual inventory and filed police reports for numerous stolen vehicles of course, the dealerships had no idea when or how the thefts took place. The vehicles may have been missing for several months before the dealership was aware of the crime. Upon talking with the managers about how the thefts were occurring, employee hiring practices were reviewed. It was discovered that there was a correlation between employment screening of applicants and auto theft. The Dealerships that utilized screening procedures (background, credit, and drug screening) had less auto and parts thefts than those that did not.

The problems identified through T.R.A.P. are found throughout the automotive sales industry nationwide. The team attempted to locate any previous Community Policing Projects that addressed a similar problem with car dealerships, but no material could be found on the matter. T.R.A.P. required that the Police Department and private businesses pro-actively work together to find solutions.

C. RESPONSE After analyzing the problem and discovering that the problem at dealerships was much larger than just reporting procedures, a plan was developed to address several security-related issues. A T.R. A.P. plan was written and a plan of action worked out. The goals of T.R. A.P. were: 1. Reduce auto and part thefts at the dealerships 2. Increase property recovery rate 3. Decrease time delay from crime to discovery 4. Implement crime prevention systems at dealerships 5. Ensure the safety of employees During the analysis phase of the project, the managers at the dealerships had been contacted and they agreed to work together with the Police Department. The managers invited the CAT personnel to conduct a security survey of the business. To follow-up, the CAT personnel sent a letter to the manager advising them that an on-site survey of the dealership was going to be conducted and defined the parameters of the survey (see attachment 1). The CAT members also put together a T.R.A.P. Security Survey (see attachment 2). This form was used by officers surveying of the dealership. The form included questions such as: 1. Are the keys left in the cars in the service area?

2. Are background checks used for new employees? 3. Do the salesmen require a driver's license verification on customers prior to test drives? As the surveys were completed at participating dealerships, CAT members met with the management, identifying the problems and recommending changes. The CAT members developed a three-tiered approach to effectively address the security problem: Phase One - Auto dealer employees attend a two-hour training program in theft prevention and crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), such as appropriate lighting, securing access points, and internal procedures. Phase Two - Business Security Survey including a CPTED analysis of the property. Dealerships must meet the minimum requirements. Phase Three - Implementation: a) Practice employee screening procedures (reference checks, criminal background checks, credit checks, drug screening). b) Report auto thefts immediately to the Glendale Police Department. c) Utilize uniform "test drive" procedures. d) Utilize secure key policies such as lock boxes, starter interrupt systems, or key vending machines. e) Minimum bi-weekly inventory of cars.

The following is a list of recommendations developed for one dealership in Glendale after two Business Security Surveys were completed at their business: 1) Prospective clients should be observed as soon as they enter the lot and contacted in the first few minutes. 2) Do not leave the keys in the cars in the service area. 3) The security guard at the gate should require written authorization to remove a car. 4) Utilize a locking key board for the front lot. 5) Move the keyboard to a location that is away from customers access area. 6) Utilize a key access to external doors that are marked "employees only." 7) Maintain a photograph and set of fingerprints of employees. 8) Conduct criminal background checks on all employees. 9) Add "employees only beyond this point" sign in the service area parking lot. 10) Utilize photo-identification cards that must be worn by employees. 11) Require driver's license verification of all drivers before going on a test drive. 12) Add security patrol at night (perhaps a cooperative effort with other neighboring auto dealerships). 13) Join Glendale's Crime Free Auto Dealership Program. The CAT members truly created a partnership with the auto dealers in Glendale through the team's problem solving efforts. The participating dealerships worked as a

team to reduce the auto theft problem. The Police Department's auto theft detectives were part of the T.R. A.P. and assisted with putting together a pro-active plan. The auto theft detectives also worked with the county attorney and the dealership managers which resulted in new reporting forms and procedures. This program could have been more effective had all dealerships had been involved. The program is voluntary and the dealerships with the biggest problems participated. Because these dealerships had the biggest problems, the number of auto thefts declined significantly from 1995 to 1997. The number of dealerships that participated 4 out of the 8 new car dealerships in the city. After discussing the program with General Managers and Owners of the auto dealerships, it was hoped that insurance companies would see the benefits of the program and endorse T.R. A.P.

D. ASSESSMENT Since implementation of T.R.A.P., participating dealerships have seen a sharp decline in the number of auto thefts. One dealer who had 15 cars stolen from February to May 1996, had the problem stop after implementing the program. To date, no car has been stolen from that dealership since T.R.A.P. implementation. The statistics for stolen vehicles from the dealerships before the T.R.A.P. and since it was implemented are as follows: Chart #1 indicates a 21% reduction from 1995 to 1996 in the number of new cars stolen from auto dealerships in Glendale. To date, there has been a 67% reduction in the

number of cars stolen from July 1997 compared to those in July 1995. These statistics clearly show that auto thefts from new car dealerships are declining from previous years due to the Police Department's problem solving approach. The traditional approach would have been the police and the dealerships working on the problems independently. The cooperation and teamwork would not exist and the problems would probably continue. However, T.R.A.P. has changed how the police department and auto dealers view one another. Now there is a feeling of cooperation between the two groups. In addition, the auto dealers have specific contacts at the Police Department when they need special attention. Comments from owners and managers have been very favorable. The quality of life will not only have an effect on Glendale due to T.R.A.P., but dealerships that utilize the program have less cars stolen. The insurance companies will charge less to cover the dealerships. This savings is passed on to the consumer who gets a car at a better price. Since the implementation of T.R.A.P., other police agencies throughout the country have inquired about Glendale's innovative program. T.R.A.P. is beginning to be used in other communities with auto dealerships.

3. AGENCY AND OFFICER INFORMATION This problem-solving project was adopted and supported by the administration of the Police Department, patrol officers and auto theft detectives. The Community Action Team was the focus point and project leader, however, all areas of the department worked together to solve this problem, particularly with the Auto Theft Detectives. The Glendale Police Department has conducted Community Policing training with all officers and the SARA model is part of this training. All officers are encouraged and assisted in conducting Problem Oriented Policing projects of their own, therefore, when planning and conducting the T.R. A.P. project, all parties involved were previously trained in problem solving. Patrol supervisors complete bi-monthly evaluations/reviews of the officers. During this review, a form is completed which documents job performance and any projects being worked. In addition, information on projects should be mentioned in the bi-annual performance evaluation. The CAT team researched nationwide, any similar projects regarding dealerships. No prior projects had been documented or located, although the problems identified in this project are experienced by dealerships nationwide. Regarding monetary commitments to this project, no funds were expended beyond the already allocated budget and all personnel worked this project during regular work hours. Project Contact Persons: Bruce Wall, Crime Prevention Specialist Sergeant Johnny Arevalo Glendale Police Department 6835 N. 57 Drive Glendale, AZ 85301 Office: (602) 930-3275 Fax: (602)931-2157 E-Mail: Wall@ci. glendale. az.us