Assessing the Female Neck Injury Risk



Similar documents
ADSEAT. An EU funded project within the 7th Framework Programme. Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants

INFLUENCE OF CRASH SEVERITY ON VARIOUS WHIPLASH INJURY SYMPTOMS: A STUDY BASED ON REAL-LIFE REAR-END CRASHES WITH RECORDED CRASH PULSES

WHIPLASH INJURIES, NOT ONLY A PROBLEM IN REAR-END IMPACT

ENHANCEMENT OF SEAT PERFORMANCE IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

Biomechanics of the Neck in Rear Impacts for improved Seat Design

Euro NCAP Whiplash Rating - Toyota Position & Proposal. May 2011

Whiplash Testing and Assessment Summary of Current Activities in Europe

Summary Report: Requirements and Assessment of Low-Speed Rear Impact Whiplash Dummies

COMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS

A multi-body head and neck model for low speed rear impact analysis

ABSTRACT INJURY CRITERION TO ASSESS WHIPLASH INJURY IN FMVSS NO. 202 DYNAMIC TEST OPTION

Relationship of Dynamic Seat/Head Restraint Ratings to Real-world Neck Injury Rates

Injury Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine in Car Collisions - Some needs for further research

A NEW TEST METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NECK INJURIES IN REAR-END COLLISIONS

Neck injuries in car collisions - Injury mechanisms

A NEW NECK INJURY CRITERION CANDIDATE FOR REAR-END COLLISIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT SHEAR FORCES AND BENDING MOMENTS

THE EFFECT OF WHIPLASH PROTECTION SYSTEMS IN REAL-LIFE CRASHES AND THEIR CORRELATION TO CONSUMER CRASH TEST PROGRAMMES

Addressing Female Whiplash Injury Protection A Step Towards 50 th Percentile Female Rear Impact Occupant Models

Evaluation of Seat Performance Criteria for Future Rear-end Impact Testing

REAL-WORLD PERFORMANCE OF CITY SAFETY BASED ON SWEDISH INSURANCE DATA

DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL INFORMATION

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

Long-term medical consequences to children injured in car crashes and influence of crash directions

How Do Euro NCAP Results Correlate with Real-Life Injury Risks? A Paired Comparison Study of Car-to-Car Crashes

Influence of Gender, Height, Weight, Age, Seated Position and Collision Site related to Neck Pain Symptoms in Rear End Impacts

Minutes. GTR No. 7 / BioRID TEG. Group of Experts Whiplash Injury Criteria Meeting

THE EURO NCAP WHIPLASH TEST

PERFORMANCE OF SEATS WITH ACTIVE HEAD RESTRAINTS IN REAR IMPACTS

GENDER ANALYSIS ON WHIPLASH SEAT EFFECTIVENESS: RESULTS FROM REAL-WORLD CRASHES

Curriculum Vitae Helena Stigson +46 (0)

Proposing a 2D Dynamical Model for Investigating the parameters Affecting Whiplash Injuries

How To Understand The Injury From A Whiplash

Rear Impact Dummy Biofidelity

Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP May 2014 Agenda Items 15

Correlating crash severity with injury risk, injury severity, and long-term symptoms in low velocity motor vehicle collisions

STATUS REPORT. The seats and head restraints in many vehicles don t protect people s necks, but new designs show promise

Biomechanics of Neck Injuries Resulting from Rear-End Vehicle Collisions

Q dummy family. Fahrzeugsicherheit Berlin e.v. Robert Kant, Christian Kleessen (Humanetics)

INVESTIGATION OF LOWER SPINE COMPRESSION FRACTURES IN FRONTAL CRASHES

VARIATION OF CRASH SEVERITY AND INJURY RISK DEPENDING ON COLLISIONS WITH DIFFERENT VEHICLE TYPES AND OBJECTS

How To Compare Head Injury Risk From A Front Crash Test To Head Injury From A Head Injury

Prevention is Possible: How Head Restraints Can Prevent Whiplash Injuries. Funded by the AUTO21 Network of Centers of Excellence

Finite Element Modelling of Biomechanical Dummies- The Ultimate Tool in Anti-Whiplash Safety Design?

Thorsten Adolph, Marcus Wisch, Andre Eggers, Heiko Johannsen, Richard Cuerden, Jolyon Carroll, David Hynd, Ulrich Sander

Head on collisions between passenger cars and heavy goods vehicles: Injury risk functions and benefits of Autonomous Emergency Braking.

BRADLEY E HEINRICHS, MSc PEng PRINCIPAL, SENIOR ENGINEER

Reining in Whiplash. Better Protection for Europe s Car Occupants

FIRST RESULTS FROM THE JAMA HUMAN BODY MODEL PROJECT

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

The Crash Pulse in Rear-End Car Accidents

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

Cyclist kinematics in car impacts reconstructed in simulations and full scale testing with Polar dummy

NECK INJURIES IN CAR COLLISIONS - A REVIEW COVERING A POSSIBLE INJURY MECHANISM AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW REAR-IMPACT DUMMY

Thoracic Injury Criterion for Frontal Crash Applicable to All Restraint Systems

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

WHIPLASH. Risk Factors - Prognostic Factors - Therapy. D. Verhulst,W. Jak Geneeskundige Dagen Antwerpen 11 september 2015

CITY SAFETY A SYSTEM ADDRESSING REAR-END COLLISIONS AT LOW SPEEDS

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests

40,46 16,22 16,25. no fx thoracic sp. Fx lumbar spine. no fx lumbar. spine

THUMS User Community

COMBINING CRASH RECORDER AND PAIRED COMPARISON TECHNIQUE: INJURY RISK FUNCTIONS IN FRONTAL AND REAR IMPACTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NECK INJURIES

Developments of child restraints for children 4-12 years old

Clinical Biomechanics

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes

German Insurance Association No. 38. Compact accident research. Small-overlap frontal impacts involving passenger cars in Germany

CASE STUDY. Test Laboratories. Volvo Cars Safety Centre Accelerometers Help Improve Car Safety. Sweden. Automotive. Transducers

ASSESSING MOTORCYCLE CRASH-RELATED HEAD INJURIES USING FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS

Impact Kinematics of Cyclist and Head Injury Mechanism in Car to Bicycle Collision

Is manual physical therapy more effective than other physical therapy approaches in reducing pain and disability in adults post whiplash injury?

UPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

Smart head restraint system M. Acar a ; S. J. Clark a ; R. Crouch a a

NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

Overview of evidence: Prognostic factors following whiplash injury

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

The influence of passive safety systems on head injuries suffered by the vehicle s driver

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

CORRELATION OF VEHICLE AND ROADSIDE CRASH TEST INJURY CRITERIA

BioRID II Dummy Model Development -- Influence of Parameters in Validation and Consumer Tests

Case Report: Whiplash-Associated Disorder From a Low-Velocity Bumper Car Collision: History, Evaluation, and Surgery

Signal Analysis, Modeling and Simulation of Vehicle Crash Dynamics

A COMPARISON STUDY ON VEHICLE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND INJURIES OF VULNERABLE ROAD USERS IN CHINA AND GERMANY

CharlesG.Davis,DC P hone:

1st Edition Quick reference guide for the management of acute whiplash. associated disorders

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

AUTORIZOVANÝ SOFTWARE PED2D SOFTWARE FOR 2D CAR TO PEDESTRIAN FRONTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Content 1 Assessing the Female Neck Injury Risk 3 Thesis About why Females are at Greater Risk of Sustaining Whiplash Injuries Assessing the Female Neck Injury Risk 4 High Speed X-Ray Motion Analysis of the Cervical Spine during Rear- End Impact Sled Tests 5 The ADSEAT Project 5 List of Papers Published and/or Presented 5 Coming Events in the Traffic Safety Area Anthropometric difference between EvaRID and BioRID. PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR Within the ADSEAT project, one Work Package addressed the topic of injury criteria to assess the female neck injury risk. This recently completed Work Package raised some interesting approaches when considering the injury risk during test procedures. ADSEAT PARTNERS WWW.ADSEAT.EU Based on biomechanical experiments and accident statistics, the values of injury criteria should be linked to the real-life injury risk. This allows estimation of whether the value of an injury criterion obtained from a crash test is above or below the actual threshold for real injury. However, defining relevant female neck injury criteria is difficult due to the lack of available studies addressing this topic. Therefore, real life accident data provided by an insurance company were used in the ADSEAT project together with studies on volunteer experiments to base the development of initial suggestions with regards to modifying some of the most common neck injury criteria. Today we know that the female injury risk is higher although differences in injury mechanisms between females and males have not been indicated. Consequently, it was assumed that the injury criteria such as Neck Injury Criteria (NIC) and Nkm currently being used, could still be applied but would need to be adjusted somewhat to take female occupants into account. Based on theoretical considerations, initial suggestions for such injury criteria were derived from accident data and volunteer experiments. To analyse whether our suggestions were reasonable, computer simulations and sled tests were performed. The computer simulations carried out in this part of the project made use of finite element (FE) models of a female rear-impact dummy, EvaRID (also developed within the ADSEAT project), and the male rear-impact dummy, BioRID, which is already being used in whiplash research. Both dummy models were seated in the same seat and the different crash pulses were applied followed by a comparison output of 1

the models. Additionally, FE simulations using the head-neck system of a male and a female human body model were conducted. Similarly, crash pulses of different severities were applied to investigate differences in the response of the models. Generally the results from the computer simulations confirm that a higher injury risk is to be expected for females than for males, which is reflected in the discussed injury criteria. Furthermore, sled tests were performed using different seat models, some of which were equipped with an anti-whiplash system and all tests were conducted in accordance with Euro NCAP test procedures. Before performing the tests, a new loading device called BioRID50F crudely representing the anthropometry of a 50th percentile female, was developed. The development of this loading device was deemed necessary and was thus included in the Work Package. Although the developed loading device needs further validation, it can be highlighted that a first step towards the development of a female rearimpact dummy was made. This represents a significant advancement in whiplash injury protection which was achieved in this Work Package. The BioRID50F, a prototype dummy model, complements the computer model EvaRID, also developed in the ADSEAT project. The sled tests clearly demonstrated differences in the seat performance when comparing the results obtained for the BioRID50F and the BioRID. Due to the design of the seats, the performance of some seats deteriorated significantly when loaded with a smaller and lighter prototype dummy model. Consequently, the seat performance rating in consumer tests, for example, must also be expected to differ for male and female occupants. Furthermore, the test conditions need to be adjusted so that the seated posture of a female occupant is considered. In summary, the different approaches used in this Work Package have shown that female neck injury criteria based on the same biomechanical principles as for males should be used. In particular, modified versions of NIC and Nkm are important for future investigation. A NIC threshold of 12, and reduced intercept values for Nkm are suggested. Furthermore, a reduction to 60 per cent of the male intercept values is suggested. Sled tests and computer simulations indicate that such criteria/threshold values seem a reasonable starting point. However, for future work related to test procedures, a proper physical female rear-impact dummy model is needed for evaluating the seat performance in sled tests. The loading device BioRID50F can serve as a first step towards such proper physical female rear impact dummy model. Sequence: EvaRID, IIWPG 16 [km/h], high head restraint. 2

PhD thesis Addressing Female Whiplash Injury Protection A Step Towards 50th Percentile Female Rear Impact Occupant Models The ADSEAT project has resulted in Dr Anna Carlsson successfully defending her thesis and receiving her PhD on 20 April 2012. The study was divided in two major parts; rear impact volunteer tests (Papers I III) and data for the development of 50th percentile female occupant models (Papers IV V). Scientists (Canada) from previously performed test was further analysed (Papers I & III). Within the ADSEAT project a 50th percentile female rear impact dummy Finite Element (FE) model, EvaRID V1.0, was developed from an existing BioRID II model. The EvaRID model was based on anthropometric data found in the literature compiled and analysed by Dr Carlsson. The initial part of the work was primarily funded by the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova), Sweden; additional funding was provided by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, (IIHS), USA, Folksam Research Foundation (Folksam) Sweden, and The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Sweden. The latter part of the thesis describes research performed within the ADSEAT project. Overview of the PhD thesis. The overall objective of the thesis was to improve the understanding of why females are at greater risk of sustaining whiplash injuries in rear impacts, compared to males. A review of the literature was performed, which was presented in the Introduction of the thesis. One rear impact study involving ~50th percentile female volunteers was performed and the results compared to responses of male volunteers earlier tested under similar test conditions (Paper II); Data provided by MEA Forensic Engineers & A rear impact study involving ~50th percentile male and female volunteers was performed and the data used for tuning of the stiffness of the EvaRID model (Paper IV). In addition, injury statistics from the ADSEAT partners AGU and Folksam were extracted in order to investigate the stature and mass distributions of females sustaining WAD in rear impacts. Furthermore, in the ADSEAT project, a scaleddown rear impact dummy prototype BioRID50F was developed using modified BioRID II dummy components. The scaled-down dummy was representative of a 50th percentile female in mass and crude size and intended to be used as a seat loading device. The BioRID50F was evaluated against new volunteer test results from low-speed rear impact sled tests including female volunteers close to a 50th percentile female in size (Paper V). A series of rear impact tests with the 3

BioRID50F were performed in four different seats from four different car models as described earlier in this newsletter. It was found that the overall biofidelity of the EvaRID V1.0 was acceptable at low velocity changes (7 km/h) (Paper IV). However, further improvements of the EvaRID V1.0, is required with regards to the stiffness of the thoracic spine. The results from the rear impact test series comprising volunteers and the BioRID50F supported the findings from earlier publications, indicating that there may be characteristic differences in the rear impact dynamic seat back interaction between males and females. A mechanical or computational model of a 50th percentile female would be an important complement to the existing 50th percentile male BioRID II occupant model when evaluating seat performance. These models can be used, not only as a tool when designing protective systems, but also in the process of further evaluation and development of injury criteria. Read the thesis Addressing Female Whiplash Injury Protection A Step Towards 50th Percentile Female Rear Impact Occupant Models [http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/cpl/ record/index.xsql?pubid=156181] Contact Anna Carlsson Department of Applied Mechanics/Safer, Chalmers University of Technology E-mail: anna.carlsson@chalmers.se Phone: +46 (0) 31-772 36 50, +46 (0)705-94 36 50 High Speed X-Ray Motion Analysis of the Cervical Spine during Rear-End Impact Sled Tests Vertebra motion during rear-end sled test using markers for optimized contrast on high speed videos. Detailed knowledge of the neck vertebra and head motion during whiplash trauma is important for identifying injury mechanisms and countermeasures. A series of sled tests were performed in accordance with Euro NCAP whiplash test pulses on two male and two female, who had donated their remains to scientific research (referred to as the subjects ). The subjects were immediately frozen deceased humans of the size close to 50th percentile. Each subject was tested four times in total with and without a headrest, initially, at the lower severity and subsequently at the higher severity pulse. The real time x-ray images on the image intensifier screen were recorded using a high speed camera system at a frame rate up to 1,000 frames per second. Screws were inserted into the vertebral body of the cervical spine in order to optimise the contrast on high speed cine x-ray. Additionally, accelerometers were fixed to the T1 and sternum, and a further accelerometer was mounted to the skull at the centre of gravity. The high speed cine x-ray analysis offers the potential to directly visualise the vertebra kinematics without extrapolation of motion tracking of external markers. Motion tracking of the markers provided useful data to characterise the displacement in x- and z-directions. 4

The ADSEAT Project BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES List of Papers Published Linder A. Biomechanical Data for a Computational Model of an Average Female. (2010) 6th World Congress on Biomechanics, Singapore. Carlsson A, Siegmund G P, Linder A, Svensson M. Motion of the Head and Neck of Females and Male Volunteers in Rear Impact Car-to-car Tests at 4 and 8 km/h. (2010) Int. IRCOBI Conf. on the Biomechanics of Injury, Hannover, Germany. Kullgren, A, Krafft, M. Gender Analysis on Whiplash Seat Effectiveness: Results from Real-world Crashes. (2010) Int. IRCOBI Conf. on the Biomechanics of Injury, Hannover, Germany. Schick S, Kullgren A, Tomasch E, Jakobsson L, Linder A, Gales N, Hell W, Schmitt KU. Basics for Developing a Female Occupant Model for Investigating Cervical Spine Distortion Injury (CSD). (2010) ESAR conference, Hannover, Germany. Chang F, Carlsson A, Lemmen P, Svensson M, Davidsson J, Schmitt K-U, Zhu F, Linder A. EvaRID, A dummy model representing females in rear end impacts. (2010) Whiplash 2010 Neck Pain in Car Crashes, 3rd International Conference, Munich, Germany. Tomasch E. Gleichberechtigung bei den Dummy modellen. (2010) Virtual Vehicle Magazin, Issue Number. 8, 2010-4. Schick S, Thorsteinsdottir K, Horion S, Hell W. Risikofaktoren für die Inzidenz des WAD (Whiplash Associated Disorder) Unterschiede zwischen Mann und Frau? (2010) Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. Linder A. Tool for evaluation of adaptive seat to reduce neck injuries for female and male occupants. (2011) IQPC 6th International Conference Innovative Seating, Frankfurt, Germany. Linder A, Svensson M, Carlsson A, Lemmen P, Chang F, Schmitt K-U, Kullgren A. Eva- RID Anthropometric and biomechanical specification of a finite element dummy model of an average female for rear impact testing (2011). 22nd ESV Conference, 13 16 June Washington, USA. Linder A. EvaRID a crash test dummy model of an average female. (2011) Gender Summit, 8 October, Brussels, Belgium. Carlsson A. Siegmund GP, Linder A, Svensson MY. Motion of the Head and Neck of Female and Male Volunteers in Rear Impact Carto-Car Impacts. (2012) Accepted for publication in Traffic Inj. Prev. Carlsson A. Addressing Female Whiplash Injury Protection. (2012) PhD thesis, Chalmers University. Linder A, Schick S, Hell W, Svensson M., Carlsson A, Lemmen P, Schmitt K-U, Tomasch E. (2012) ADSEAT Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants. TRA Conference, 23 26 April, Athens, Greece. Coming Events in the Traffic Safety Area Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics (ESB2012) IRCOBI Conference 2012 ADSEAT has a special session on 12 September: Rear-end impact/spinal injuries Stapp Car Crash Conference 5