New Safe Harbors and Stark Exceptions for Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Health Records Arrangements



Similar documents
Health Law Bulletin. New Stark Law Exception and Anti-Kickback Statute Safe Harbor for E-Prescribing and Electronic Health Record Technology

FRAUD AND ABUSE CONCERNS FOR ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Stark and Anti-kickback Regulations: Proposed Changes for E-prescribing and Electronic Health Records

STARK AND ANTI-KICKBACK PROTECTION FOR E-PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS

Safe Harbors and Exceptions for E-Prescribing and Electronic Health Records: What Now?

EHR Donation: Compliance with Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute

Health information technology donations: A guide for physicians. Readiness survey inside

Rebecca Williams, RN, JD Partner Co-chair Health Information Technology/HIPAA Practice Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Legal Issues in Electronic Health Records Acquisition, Implementation and Monitoring

Health October Proposed Health Information Technology Protections Under New Antikickback Statute Safe Harbors and New Stark Exceptions

group practice journal

Stark, False Claims and Anti- Kickback Laws: Easy Ways to Stay Compliant with the Big Three in Healthcare

ReedSmith. CMS and the OIG Extend Protections for Electronic Health Record Donations. Client Alert. Life Sciences Health Industry Group

HEALTH CARE ADVISORY

Fraud and Abuse Primer. Stark Law The Anti-Kickback Statute False Claims Act

What is the Meaning of Meaningful Use? How to Decode the Opportunities and Risks in Health Information Technology

Department of Health and Human Services

Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

Providing Subsidized EHR to Physicians Under Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute. Charles B. Oppenheim, Esq.

TM Nightingale. Home Healthcare. Fraud & Abuse: Prevention, Detection, & Reporting

The following presentation was based on the

Compliance and Program Integrity Melanie Bicigo, CHC, CEBS

THE CHRIST HOSPITAL POLICY NO ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 6 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND STARK LAW

Touchstone Health Training Guide: Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention

False Claims Act CMP212

Legal Issues to Consider When Creating a Health Care Business Model

Adopting Electronic Medical Records: What Do the New Federal Incentives Mean to Your Individual Physician Practice?

MEDICAID AND MEDICARE (PARTS C&D) FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE TRAINING

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Pharmacies

Department of Health and Human Services

How To Get A Medical Bill Of Health From A Member Of A Health Care Provider

Department of Health and Human Services

Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics

FIRST TIER, DOWNSTREAM AND RELATED ENTITIES (FDR) ANNUAL TRAINING

Frequently Used Health Care Laws

Donating Health Information Technology:

In early April, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Page 1 of 9

Federal and State Laws Relating to Referrals

Medicare Advantage and Part D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training. October 2010

HCCA 2013 COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE 101 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

Preventing Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act and Healthcare Reform: Implications for Compliance Initiatives and Fraud Investigations

GETTING HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO PHYSICIANS

USC Office of Compliance

Thursday, October 10, 2013 POTENTIAL BARRIERS TO HOSPITAL SUBSIDIES FOR HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE IN NEED

Medicare Compliance and Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training

ACOs: Fraud & Abuse Waivers and Analysis

Compliance: What Every Reference Lab Representative Should Know By Peter Francis

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Medicare and Medicaid Providers

General Policy Statement and Standards on Prohibition on Self-Referrals, Kickbacks and Inducements to Refer. Refer to document abstract on Pulse

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS

I. Policy Purpose. II. Policy Statement. III. Policy Definitions: RESPONSIBILITY:

Prime Staffing-Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Training Guide Designed for First-tier, Downstream and Related Entities

FRAUD, WASTE & ABUSE. Training for First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities. Slide 1 of 24

Department of Health and Human Services. No. 249 December 27, Part III

To: All Vendors, Agents and Contractors of Hutchinson Regional Medical Center

AVOIDING FRAUD AND ABUSE

PHYSICIAN/HOSPITAL FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS POST-TEST. Name: Date: Practice Plan:

Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

2Q. Will the Department provide guidance on the fair market value (FMV) for software and donated systems?

BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Senior Care Division and Volunteer State Health Plan

Bill Moran and Betta Sherman

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Providers

Medicare Compliance, Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Medicare Part D- Contracted Pharmacies

Electronic Health Record License Agreements

Accountable Care Organizations Multiple Comment Periods

Detecting and Preventing Fraud, Waste and Abuse

UPDATED. Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Medicare Program; Physicians Referrals to Health Care Entities With Which They

CHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES

Fraud, Waste & Abuse. UPMC Health Plan Quality Audit, Fraud, Waste & Abuse Department

Florida Health Care Plans Fraud, Waste & Abuse and Compliance Training

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Training

MEDICAID AND MEDICARE (PARTS C&D) FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE TRAINING

Standards of Conduct for First Tier, Downstream, and Related Entities (FDR)

Health Law Section Spring Conference May 7, 2013 Scott S. Bell. parsonsbehle.com

Keeping our Focus: Compliance Summary for Customers and Health Care Professionals. Understanding the Olympus Health Care Compliance Code of Conduct

Federal Health Care Fraud & Abuse, Compliance and Program Integrity

Objectives. Fraud and Abuse defined Enforcement agencies Fraud and Abuse regulations Five-step action plan

Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws

Health Care Program Compliance Guide

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Medicare, Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Programs; Transparency Reports

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training

Overview, Guidance & Training: Medicare Fraud, Waste & Abuse

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training

CMS Mandated Training for Providers, First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities

Discovering a Potential Overpayment: An Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations

MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S Revised

LMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse

MEDICARE PART D E-PRESCRIBING STANDARDS: EARLY ASSESSMENT SHOWS PARTIAL CONNECTIVITY

Prepared by: The Office of Corporate Compliance & HIPAA Administration

Compliance, Code of Conduct & Ethics Program Cantex Continuing Care Network. Contents

AppleCare General Compliance Training

EMR SHARING AND CONTRACTING ISSUES, RISKS AND PITFALLS KEVIN M. MOONEY, ESQ. COUNSEL/CHAIR IT PRACTICE GROUP THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION

Submitted via the Federal erulemaking Portal:

January 14, Dear Chairman Issa:

2013 Medicare. Part D Fraud, Training. First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities

ROLE OF CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IN A HEALTHCARE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM DESIGN

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Transcription:

New Safe Harbors and Stark Exceptions for Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Health Records Arrangements November 15, 2006 Steve Nash and Sara Hill, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP Agenda Introduction Background Stark Exceptions Anti-kickback Safe Harbors Issues and Ambiguities Questions

New Exceptions and Safe Harbors To reach full HIT interoperability, information must be accessible across patient care settings, including physicians offices and hospitals. Until very recently, hospitals and health systems could not directly or indirectly fund IT systems for physicians without risk of violating the Stark or anti-kickback laws. August 8, 2006 - CMS and HHS established new Stark exceptions and anti-kickback safe harbors to enable potential donors to provide physicians with information technology for e-prescribing and electronic health records. Stark Law Physician Self-Referral Law: Section 1877 of the Social Security Act Civil statute enacted in 1989 to prevent healthcare providers from inappropriately profiting from referrals Prohibits physicians from making referrals for certain designated health services payable by Medicare to an entity with which the physician (or immediate family member) has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies Prohibits an entity for making claims to Medicare for those referred services, unless an exception applies Violations punishable by denial of payment for claims, refund of amounts collected, and civil monetary penalties

Anti-Kickback Statute The Medicare and Medicaid Patient Protection Act of 1987, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b Criminal Statute Applies to all who bill for or influence the use of federally funded health services Felony to knowingly and willfully give, receive, offer, or solicit payment for referrals of business reimbursable under any Federal health care program Safe harbors established by regulations Fines up to $25,000 and imprisonment of up to five years, civil monetary penalties, program exclusion, and liability under the False Claims Act HIT Exceptions and Safe Harbors E-Prescribing Exceptions: Congressional mandate of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) EHR Safe Harbors: product of the Bush Administration s direction to facilitate the adoption of EHRs by 2014 Regulations published on August 8, 2006 Final Rule Effective October 10, 2006 2 new anti-kick back safe harbors (OIG) 2 new Stark exceptions (CMS)

Stark Exception - Electronic Prescribing 42 C.F.R. 411.357(v) Hardware, software, or information technology and training services necessary and used solely to transmit and receive electronic prescription information Permissible arrangements: By a hospital to a physician who is a member of its medical staff By a group practice to a physician who is a member of the group By a Prescription Drug Plan sponsor or Medicare Advantage Organization to a prescribing physician Stark Exception - Electronic Prescribing No monetary limit Physician may not make receipt of the donated services or items a condition of doing business with the donor Donor cannot limit or restrict the use or compatibility of the items or services with other electronic prescribing or electronic health records systems Donated service or item must be usable for all patients regardless of payor

Stark Exception - Electronic Prescribing Donations cannot be based directly or indirectly on the volume or value of referrals from the potential recipient Donors must not have knowledge that the recipient has any items or services equivalent to those being donated Must comply with Medicare Part D electronic prescribing standards, including interoperability Stark Exception - Electronic Prescribing Documentation requirements: in writing signed by parties specify the items and services being provided identify the cost to the donor of the items and services updated master list Exception does not expire

Stark Exception - EHRs 42 CFR 411.357(w) Includes electronic health records software or information technology and training services Must be necessary and used predominately to create, maintain, transmit, or receive electronic health records Must include e-prescribing capability that meet applicable Part D standards CPOE not mandated Must be provided to a physician by a hospital or other entity that furnishes designated health care services Stark Exception - EHRs Interoperable software ( 411.351) communicate and exchange data accurately, effectively, securely and consistently exchange data so the clinical or operational purpose and meaning of the data are preserved and unaltered deemed interoperable if a certifying body has certified the software no more than 12 months prior to the date it is provided to the physician May perform additional functions if predominant function concerns EHRs No monetary limit recipients must pay 15% of the donor s cost prior to receipt of items and services

Stark Exception - EHRs Donors must not have knowledge that the recipient has any items or services equivalent to those being donated Donor may not restrict use, compatibility, or interoperability of the items or services with other electronic prescribing or electronic health records Does not include staffing (e.g. to populate data base) and cannot be used primarily to conduct personal business Must not violate anti-kickback statute or any Federal or State laws concerning billing or claims submission Stark Exception - EHRs Donations cannot be based directly or indirectly on the volume or value of referrals from the potential recipient Physician may not make receipt of the donated services or items a condition of doing business with the donor Documentation requirements: in writing signed by parties specify the items and services being provided identify the cost to the donor of the items and services updated master list Donations must be made on or before December 31, 2013

Safe Harbors Electronic Prescribing 42 C.F.R. 1001.952(x) Non-monetary remuneration that is necessary and used solely to transmit and receive electronic prescription information may include hardware and operating systems Must be compliant with Part D standards at the time of donation, including interoperability Mirrors the Stark exception, but more expansive in scope Recipients: prescribing health care professionals who are members of a practice group, pharmacies and pharmacists receiving items or services from a hospital Only physician members of a medical staff may receive items or services from a hospital Safe Harbor EHRs 42 C.F.R. 1001.952(y) Donors: providers of Medicare or Medicaid covered services who submit claims, or on whose behalf claims are submitted, or health plans Recipients: Any providers of healthcare goods or services Donation must be used predominately to create, maintain, transmit or receive EHRs Mirrors Stark exception in terms of donations and conditions, but slightly more expansive in terms of recipients

Safe Harbor EHRs Protected donors: people and organizations that provide health services covered by a federal health program in addition to health plans Protected recipients: people and organizations that provide health care No cost shifting Take Note...Issues and Ambiguities Hospital s tax exempt status may be at risk IRS restricts tax-exempt entities from making donations that do not benefit the public or help further their charitable mission Ambiguous regulations: How are hospitals supposed to calculate the physician s 15% minimum contribution? What is equivalent technology? State preemption? Implementation Barriers Interoperable software Software certification requirement within 12 months prior to the donation No hardware exceptions

Thank you. Sara Hill, sara.hill@hro.com Steve Nash, steve.nash@hro.com