Providing Subsidized EHR to Physicians Under Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute. Charles B. Oppenheim, Esq.
|
|
|
- Phyllis Ford
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Providing Subsidized to Physicians Under Stark and Anti-Kickback Statute Presented by Charles B. Oppenheim, Esq. (310) Subsidizing for Physicians: Why would I want to do that? Helps to further hospital/physician alignment. Enhances quality, efficiency and performance. Allows physicians to access Medicare/Medicaid incentive payments. ACO s are coming soon! 2 1
2 Stark and Anti-Kickback What are the Stark law and the Antikickback statute and why do I care about them? 3 Exception What s Required? that qualifies includes software, information technology, training, maintenance, help desk, etc. Note: Hardware cannot be donated; cash cannot be given; and you cannot subsidize the staff required to input old records into system. 4 2
3 Exception What s Required? Cont d The donated items and services must be used predominately to create, maintain, transmit, or receive. software may have ancillary functions, provided that the functions predominate and that the ancillary functions relate to the care and treatment of individual patients; The software must be interoperable at the time it is provided to the physician. Software is deemed interoperable if a certifying body recognized by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has certified the software no more than 12 months prior to the date it is provided to the recipient; 5 Exception What s Required? Cont d The donor (or any person acting on the donor s behalf) does not take any action to limit or restrict the use, compatibility, or interoperability of the items or services with other prescribing or systems; Before receipt of the items and services, the physician pays at least 15% of the donor s cost for the items and services (the Physician Contribution ). The donor (or any party related to the donor) does not finance the Physician Contribution or loan funds to be used by the physician to pay for the items or services; 6 3
4 Exception What s Required? Cont d Neither the physician nor the physician s practice (including employees and staff members) makes the receipt of items or services, or the amount or nature of the items or services, a condition of doing business with the donor. Neither the eligibility of a physician for the items of services, nor the amount or nature of the items and services, is determined in a manner that directly takes into account the volume or value of referrals or other business generated between the parties (note: taking referrals indirectly into account is OK); 7 Exception What s Required? Cont d A written agreement between the parties sets forth the costs of the items and services and other terms of the arrangement; The donor does not have actual knowledge of, and does not act in reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance of, the fact that the physician possesses or has obtained items and services equivalent to those provided by the donor; 8 4
5 Exception What s Required? Cont d 9 For items and services that are of the type that can be used for any patient without regard to payor status, the donor does not restrict, or take any action to limit, the physician s right or ability to use the items and services for any patient; The items and services do not include staffing of physician offices and are not used primarily to conduct personal business unrelated to the physician s medical practice; Exception What s Required? Cont d The donor does not shift the costs of the items or services to any federal health care program; and The contains electronic prescribing capability. The regulations became effective on October 10, 2006, and sunset on December 31,
6 11 What Can Be Donated? function must predominate need not be exclusive function. Cannot provide equivalent or duplicative technology, but can provide upgrades or items or services that would (1) enhance functionality, or (2) standardize systems. What if physician has equivalent technology, but it doesn t meet meaningful use under ARRA/HIT? How Can Physicians Be Selected? 12 Can t take their referrals directly into account. Can take their referrals indirectly into account. The regulations provide several criteria that, if used, will be deemed to not directly take into account the volume or value of referrals: Number of prescriptions. The total number of prescriptions written by the physician (but not volume/value of prescriptions dispensed or paid by the donor or billed to the Medicare or Medicaid programs); 6
7 How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d 13 Size of practice. The size of the physician s practice (e.g., total patients, total patient encounters, or total relative value units); Total hours. The total number of hours that the physician practices medicine; Use of technology. The overall use of automated technology in the medical practice (but not use of technology in connection with referrals made to the hospital); How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d Medical staff membership. Whether the physician is a member of the hospital s medical staff; Level of uncompensated care. The level of uncompensated care provided by the physician; In addition to the criteria set forth in the regulations, below are several criteria that could potentially be used. 14 7
8 15 How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d Adherence to quality protocols (which may change over time). Community need for physician services. Active Medical Staff Membership. Adequate personnel within a physician s office who can support the technology as a potential screening criteria. Physician specialty; How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d 16 Physicians who are good community citizens, potentially determined by considering: Participation in hospital quality improvement activities, Willingness to serve as a trainer for other physicians, Medical staff meeting attendance, Prompt completion of patient charts, Involvement in hospital committees, Consistent use of hospital-based inpatient information technology systems, Continuing medical education seminar attendance, and Participation in local professional associations. 8
9 How Can Physicians Be Selected? Cont d Physician adoption of compliance programs; Physician participation on hospital call panels; Physician participation in the Medi-Cal and Medicare programs; Physicians who participate in certain manage care plans; Medical school attended; Location of residency; Department (if the EMR technology is rolled out by department). 17 Who Can Be A Donor? Under Stark, any entity that bills for DHS. Under AKS, anyone who provides services covered by a federal healthcare program and submits claims or requests for payment from a federal healthcare program. 18 9
10 Determining 15% of Donor s Cost What if there are multiple donors to physician? How to determine/allocate costs? Direct, indirect, incremental, capital costs? Are different physician contribution percentages OK for different physicians? 19 Donations to Medical Group Regulations are written as to physician recipients. Eligible v. ineligible physicians. Addressing physician additions/departures. Addressing individual physician compliance with standards
11 Other Laws/Issues Liability/Risk Management IRS/Tax-Exempt Organization Issues State Kickback/Physician Self-Referral Laws 21 Implementation Models Model One: Vendor 100% cost Donor 15% cost Physician 22 11
12 Implementation Models, Cont d Model Two: Donor 85% cost 15% cost Vendor Physician 23 12
FRAUD AND ABUSE CONCERNS FOR ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
FRAUD AND ABUSE CONCERNS FOR ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS Presented by: Peter M Hoffman, Esq Garfunkel, Wild & Travis, PC (516) 393-2268 phoffman@gwtlawcom 1 THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK
group practice journal
group practice journal P U B L I C A T I O N O F T H E A M E R I C A N M E D I C A L G R O U P A S S O C I A T I O N Reprinted from Electronic Health Record Offers: What s a Doctor to Do? BY ELLEN F. KESSLER,
ReedSmith. CMS and the OIG Extend Protections for Electronic Health Record Donations. Client Alert. Life Sciences Health Industry Group
The business of relationships. SM SM Client Alert Life Sciences Health Industry Group CMS and the OIG Extend Protections for Electronic Health Record Donations Written by Robert J. Hill, Susan A. Edwards
Electronic Health Record License Agreements
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Electronic Health Record License Agreements Negotiating Scope of License, Warranties and Liability Disclaimers and Other Key Provisions THURSDAY,
How To Defend An Ehr Subsidy
Key Legal Issues Raised by Electronic Health Physician EHR Subsidies under Stark Records Technology and the Anti-Kickback Statute Friday, November 18, 2011 Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee
Legal Issues in Electronic Health Records Acquisition, Implementation and Monitoring
Legal Issues in Electronic Health Records Acquisition, Implementation and Monitoring Thomas E. Jeffry, Jr., Esq. Partner Los Angeles, CA 90017-2566 213-633-4265 [email protected] Rebecca L. Williams, RN,
Stark and Anti-kickback Regulations: Proposed Changes for E-prescribing and Electronic Health Records
Regulatory Advisory This Regulatory Advisory, a special service to America s hospitals, contains guidance about physician self-referral and anti-kickback regulations. Stark and Anti-kickback Regulations:
Adopting Electronic Medical Records: What Do the New Federal Incentives Mean to Your Individual Physician Practice?
Adopting Electronic Medical Records: What Do the New Federal Incentives Mean to Your Individual Physician Practice? U John M. Neclerio, Esq.,* Kathleen Cheney, Esq., C. Mitchell Goldman, Esq., and Lisa
The Road to Meaningful Use EHR Stimulus Payments. By Amy S. Leopard, Walter & Haverfield LLP
The Road to Meaningful Use EHR Stimulus Payments By Amy S. Leopard, Walter & Haverfield LLP On July 28, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule regarding what
Meaningful Use Requires Meaningful Laboratory Results
Meaningful Use Requires Meaningful Laboratory Results ARRA and Stark Safe Harbor: Opportunities and challenges for you and your outreach business [email protected] [email protected]
Discovering a Potential Overpayment: An Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations
Discovering a Potential Overpayment: An Overview of the False Claims Act, Stark Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations, Stockholder, Reid & Riege, P.C., Stockholder, Reid & Riege, P.C. Outline
FRAUD, WASTE & ABUSE. Training for First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities. Slide 1 of 24
FRAUD, WASTE & ABUSE Training for First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities Slide 1 of 24 Purpose of this Program On December 5, 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ( CMS ) published
OHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2015 Annual Meeting. Accountable Care Organizations Comprehensive Integration Strategy
OHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2015 Annual Meeting Accountable Care Organizations Comprehensive Integration Strategy ACO Development Market Conditions Increasing Economic pressures Consumerism Regulatory scrutiny
Fraud and Abuse Primer. Stark Law The Anti-Kickback Statute False Claims Act
Fraud and Abuse Primer Stark Law The Anti-Kickback Statute False Claims Act Stark Act 42 U.S.C. 1395nn The Stark II Act prohibits a physician from making a Referral to an entity; for the furnishing of
Prepared by: The Office of Corporate Compliance & HIPAA Administration
Gwinnett Health System s Annual Education 2014 Corporate Compliance: Our Commitment to Excellence Prepared by: The Office of Corporate Compliance & HIPAA Administration Objectives After completing this
Health Care Compliance Association 888-580-8373 www.hcca-info.org
Volume Twelve Number Five Published Monthly Meet Miaja Cassidy Director of Healthcare Compliance at Target page 14 Feature Focus: Managing security risks in business associate relationships page 32 Earn
Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Payment Program
1. Where did the Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program originate? The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was signed into law on February 17, 2009, and established a framework of
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS IMPLEMENTATION: WHAT HOSPITALS AND PHYSICIANS NEED TO KNOW TO COMPLY WITH RECENT HEALTH LAW REQUIREMENTS By Neville M. Bilimoria* INTRODUCTION Hospitals
Agenda. Government s Role in Promoting EMR Technology. EMR Trends in Health Care. What We Hear as Reasons to Not Implement and EMR
Agenda A 360-Degree Approach to EMR Implementation Environmental Overview Information on the HITECH Stimulus Opportunities Hospitals, Physicians and Interoperability Preparing for an EMR Implementation
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
I. Policy Purpose. II. Policy Statement. III. Policy Definitions: RESPONSIBILITY:
POLICY NAME: POLICY SPONSOR: FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE COMPLIANCE OFFICER RESPONSIBILITY: EFFECTIVE DATE: REVIEW/ REVISED DATE: I. Policy Purpose The purpose of this policy is to outline the requirements
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
Meaningful Use Stage 1:
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
Legal & Policy Issues Related to ACO Formation by Independent Physician Groups
Legal & Policy Issues Related to ACO Formation by Independent Physician Groups Troy Barsky Arthur Lerner Crowell & Moring LLP America s Health Insurance Plans ACO Summit May 15, 2013 Background Government
The recently enacted Health Information Technology for Economic
Investments in Health Information Technology Driven by HITECH Act Marcy Wilder, Donna A. Boswell, and BarBara Bennett The authors review provisions of the new stimulus package that authorize billions of
2010 MHA Governance Leadership Forum: Accountable Care Organizations. Chris Rossman, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP Detroit, Michigan
2010 MHA Governance Leadership Forum: Accountable Care Organizations Chris Rossman, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP Detroit, Michigan Overview Major health care payment reform under the Affordable Care Act (
THE CHRIST HOSPITAL POLICY NO. 4.21.113 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 6 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND STARK LAW
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 6 POLICY TITLE: ORIGINATED BY: APPROVED BY: COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND STARK LAW COMPLIANCE OFFICER COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE REVIEWED/REVISED: 1/2011;
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
Hospital-Based Provider A provider who furnishes 90% or more of their services in a hospital setting (inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room).
Glossary of Terms Adopting, implementing or upgrading (AIU) certified EHR technology The process by which providers have installed and started using certified EHR technology that is capable of meeting
11 Key Concepts from the Stark Law
11 Key Concepts from the Stark Law Scott Becker, Partner 312.750.6016 [email protected] Ji Hye Kim, Associate 312.849.8222 [email protected] Jessica L. Smith, Associate 312.849.3687 [email protected]
Accountable Care Organizations: Legal and Organizational Structures; Governance
Accountable Care Organizations: Legal and Organizational Structures; Governance The National Accountable Care Organization Congress October 25-27, 2010 Los Angeles, CA Dennis S. Diaz, Esq. Davis Wright
FAQs for AMDA Members on the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs, Including Medicare Payment Adjustments
FAQs for AMDA Members on the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs, Including Medicare Payment Adjustments Long Term Post-Acute Care Providers I am a physician or nurse practitioner
ADDENDUM TO RFQ DOCUMENTS
ADDENDUM TO RFQ DOCUMENTS REQUEST FOR QUOTE: ADDENDUM No. 1 Personal Services/Developmental Disabilities Division/Electronic Medical Records and Case Management System DATE: 12/5/14 To All Potential Bidders:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Registration and Enrollment... 2 Provider Registration- First Year Applicants... 2 Provider Registration- Returning Applicants... 2 Provider Eligibility... 3 Eligibility Eligible Professionals... 3 Eligibility
410-165-0000 Basis and Purpose... 1 410-165-0020 Definitions... 2 410-165-0040 Application... 9 410-165-0060 Eligibility... 11
Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Administrative Rulebook Office of Health Information Technology Table of Contents Chapter 410, Division 165 Effective October 24, 2013 410-165-0000 Basis
Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview
Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene 1 Agenda Terms & Timelines of Meaningful
LMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse
LMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse Revised 06/03/2014 LMHS COMPLIANCE PROGRAM 6/30/2014 2 Chief Compliance Officer Catherine A. Kahle,
REGULATORY UPDATE: TELEMEDICINE
REGULATORY UPDATE: TELEMEDICINE Collaborative Technology Solutions: The Future of Healthcare June 13, 2013 Jennifer Breuer, Esq. Drinker Biddle & Reath 312/569-1256 Agenda > Review legal and regulatory
Incentive Programs that Reward Collaborative Physician Efforts to Improve the Quality and Cost- Effective Delivery of Hospital Care
Incentive Programs that Reward Collaborative Physician Efforts to Improve the Quality and Cost- Effective Delivery of Hospital Care by Robert D. Girard, Esq. Thomas E. Jeffry, Jr., Esq. Physician Incentive
Health Information Technology (HIT) and the Medicaid/CHIP Health Information Exchange (HIE) Advisory Committee
Health Information Technology (HIT) and the Medicaid/CHIP Health Information Exchange (HIE) Advisory Committee Joseph H. Schneider, MD Chair, Medicaid/CHIP HIE Advisory Committee Chair, TMA Committee on
Client Alert. CMS Releases Proposed Rule On Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Record Technology
Contact Attorneys Regarding This Matter: Tracy M. Field 404.873.8648 - direct 404.873.8649 - fax [email protected] Erin M. Rush 404.873.7030 - direct 404.873.7031 - fax [email protected] Client Alert
MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS Brief Synopsis MACRA sunsets the Electronic
CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM
CMS FINALIZES REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM For Immediate Release: Friday, July 16, 2010 Contact: CMS Office of Public Affairs 202-690-6145 The Centers
Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
A Roadmap for New Physicians. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse
A Roadmap for New Physicians Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse Introduction This tutorial is intended to assist new physicians in understanding how to comply with Federal laws that combat
E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS CERTIFICATION AND THE HITECH INCENTIVE PROGRAM The Incentives On July 13, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services finalized the Electronic Health Record
Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals
Connecting America for Better Health Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) of 2009 provides for incentive
Meaningful Use Objectives
Meaningful Use Objectives The purpose of the electronic health records (EHR) incentive program is not so much the adoption of health information technology (HIT), but rather how HIT can further the goals
AVOIDING LEGAL PITFALLS: ADOPTION OF MARKETING EXPENSE BUDGET AND GIFT POLICY
ADOPTION OF MARKETING EXPENSE BUDGET AND GIFT POLICY BY: JEFFREY S. BAIRD, ESQ. BROWN & FORTUNATO, P.C. HEALTH CARE GROUP P.O. BOX 9418 AMARILLO, TX 79105 (806) 345-6320 (806) 345-6363 - FAX [email protected]
2012-2013 MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S. 2012 Revised
2012-2013 MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S 2012 Revised 1 Introduction CMS Requirements As of January 1, 2011, Federal Regulations require that Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) and
CHAPTER 114. AN ACT establishing a Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Demonstration Project and supplementing Title 30 of the Revised Statutes.
CHAPTER 114 AN ACT establishing a Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Demonstration Project and supplementing Title 30 of the Revised Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the
Health Care February 28, 2012. CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,
ROPES & GRAY ALERT Health Care February 28, 2012 CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ONC Issues Companion Proposed Rule on 2014 EHR Certification Criteria On February 23, 2012, the Centers
Expanded Support for Medicaid Health Information Exchanges
Expanded Support for Medicaid Health Information Exchanges Joint Public Health Forum & CDC Nationwide Webinar April 21, 2016 CDC EHR Meaningful Use Webpage-Joint Public Health Forum & CDC Nationwide Webinars
How To Bridge The Chasm Between Provider And Patient
the Health Care Delivery System Opportunities for Transforming the Health Care Delivery System Opportunities for Transforming the Health Care Delivery System Opportunities for Transforming Pennsylvania
SECTION 18 1 FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE
SECTION 18 1 FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE Annual FW&A Training Required for Providers and Office Staff 1 Examples of Fraud, Waste and Abuse 2 Fraud, Waste and Abuse Program Policy 3 Suspected Non-Compliance
COMPENSATING EMPLOYED PHYSICIANS Tax Law, Stark and Anti-Kickback Implications. AHLA Tax Issues for Healthcare Organizations October 20-22, 2013
AHLA B. Compensating Employed Physicians Tax Law, Stark, and Anti-Kickback Implications Linda Sauser Moroney Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Milwaukee, WI Claire M. Turcotte Bricker & Eckler LLP West Chester,
Frequently Asked Questions American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the HITECH Act
Frequently Asked Questions American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the HITECH Act Basics of the Bill I ve seen lots of numbers out there about the health IT parts of the Stimulus - $19 billion, $23
Fraud and Abuse Considerations for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
Fraud and Abuse Considerations for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) By: Chris Rossman, Foley & Lardner LLP, Detroit, Michigan 1. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ( CMS ) and the Office
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
Title: Fraud Waste and Abuse Laws in Health Care Policy # 1011 Sponsor: Corporate Approved by: Carleen Dunne, Director, Corporate and Privacy Officer Issued: Page: 1 of 7 June 25, 2007 Last Reviewed/Updated
Negotiating EHR Agreements: Complying with HIPAA, Stark and AKS, Overcoming Privacy and Security Risks
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Negotiating EHR Agreements: Complying with HIPAA, Stark and AKS, Overcoming Privacy and Security Risks Acquiring an EHR and Meeting Incentive Program
