"It s time to remember NOCC is also about casemix: Australian casemix development in mental health" Philip Burgess, Analysis & Reporting AMHOC: 19 November 2010 A joint Australian, State and Territory Government Initiative Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 1
A definition of casemix A summary way of describing the mix of cases The classification of patient episodes based on those patient attributes that best explain the cost of care Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 2
Casemix Myths -1 Assertion The facts casemix = DRGs casemix is a payment system there are over 100 casemix classifications casemix is a tool that can be used for payment Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 3
Casemix Myths - 2 Assertion casemix is a method of cutting costs The facts governments and managers don t need information in order to cut costs - but they do need information to cut costs in sensible ways Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 4
Casemix Myths - 3 Assertion casemix is a method of reducing quality The facts casemix is neutral, but can help in measuring quality & looking at the relationship between quality & cost Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 5
On understanding variation Variation is a fact of life in the health system We need measurement tools which help us to understand this variation Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 6
Types of variation Variation due to differences in the ways that health services treat patients Variation due to differences in the kinds of patients treated Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 7
Casemix and Variation We need to control for one type of variation in order to understand the other Casemix classifications help to control for variations between patients By controlling for variations between patients we produce information which helps us to understand the differences between providers Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 8
Casemix Classification Criteria 1. iso-resource - patients in the same class cost about the same amount to treat; 2. clinically sensible; 3. the right number of classes Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 9
Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 10
MH-CASC findings There is an underlying episode classification, not just in inpatient care but also community; Modest but acceptable levels of variation explained; The costs being driven by casemix are often confounded by the costs driven by provider variations Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 11
MH-CASC findings The variables driving costs in inpatient settings are also driving costs in the community but: the patterns of care are different. so. the importance of the variables differs across the two settings (e.g., focus of care) Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 12
MH-CASC based on: DIAGNOSIS SEVERITY, using the HoNOS scales as the main measure LEVEL OF FUNCTIONING, measured through an amended Life Skills Profile (adults) or child/adolescent specific measures; and Other CLINICAL AND SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC characteristics e.g., age 13
Summary view of MH-CASC Ongoing episodes 12 classes split on Age, Legal Status, Diagnosis and HoNOS item (Aggression/Disruptive behaviour), RUG-ADL All cases 42 classes Inpatient episodes 23 classes Completed episodes Children & Adolescents Adults 3 classes split on Diagnosis and HoNOSCA item (Disruptive/ Aggressive Behaviour) 8 classes split on Age, Diagnosis, Legal Status, HoNOS Total and RUG-ADL Community episodes 19 classes Children & Adolescents Adult 9 classes split on Age, HoNOSCA Total, HoNOS item (School Problems), CGAS, and Psychosocial factors 10 classes split on Focus of Care, Legal Status, HoNOS Total and LSP total Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 14
Adult acute inpatient episodes All cases Age < 65 yrs Age 65-85 yrs Age > 85 yrs Other Diagnoses Diagnosis = Schizophrenia, Mood or Eating Disorders 2 classes split on Dependency RUG-ADL Voluntary Involuntary 2 classes split on severity HoNOS 2 classes split on severity HoNOS Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 15
Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 16
The Vision The routine use of outcome measures (consumer and clinician rated) where such measures contribute both to improved practice and service management. An informed mental health sector in which benchmarking is the norm, to be used in a quality improvement cycle.. Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 17
The Vision The informed use of casemix to understand the variation in costs and outcomes. A health services research culture that contributes knowledge and evidence to inform best clinical practice. Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 18
Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 19
Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 20
NATIONAL HEALTH AND HOSPITALS NETWORK AGREEMENT Council of Australian Governments An agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the States and Territories, being: the State of New South Wales; the State of Victoria; the State of Queensland; the State of South Australia; the State of Tasmania; the Australian Capital Territory; and the Northern Territory of Australia. Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 21
Activity Based Funding! States responsible for system-wide public hospital service planning and policy and capital works Based on this planning, States enter into a Local Hospital Network (LHNs) Service Agreement with each LCN that specifies services to be provided LHN reports to State (and through to C wealth) on activity and performance State and Commonwealth transfer funding for these services to the National Health and Hospital Network Funding Authority in each State Commonwealth contribution based on efficient price as determined by Independent Hospital Pricing Authority Quarterly financial adjustments for variations in volumes as per Service Agreement LHN receives C wealth and State funds from National Health and Hospital Network Funding Authority State contribution determined by each State Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 22
Progress to date. Volume Compliance Completion
AUS: Figure 2.3.1.C: Adults - Ambulatory - Admission HoNOS, AUS CSR, AUS 100 92 91 89 86 Percentage Completed 75 50 25 27 24 21 21 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Graphs by NOCC Clinical Measure and Jurisdiction - Data Extract - 4 March 2010 24
Figure 2.3.1.1.C: Adults - Ambulatory - Admission - HoNOS AUS NSW VIC 92 91 96 98 100 89 89 84 84 93 94 97 91 75 50 25 Percentage Completed 0 100 75 50 25 0 100 75 50 25 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 QLD WAU SAU 100 100 100 100 98 97 90 95 98 96 96 79 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 TAS ACT NTE 97 94 86 86 88 83 88 92 26 15 20 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Graphs by Jurisdiction - Data Extract - 12 April 2010 25
100 AUS: Figure 2.3.3.C: Adults - Ambulatory - Discharge HoNOS, AUS LSP-16, AUS MH Legal Status, AUS 95 86 87 89 Percentage Completed 75 50 25 0 100 75 62 62 57 57 47 49 43 42 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Focus of Care, AUS Diagnosis, AUS CSR, AUS 88 91 86 86 83 78 79 80 50 25 0 7 8 7 7 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Graphs by NOCC Clinical Measure and Jurisdiction - Data Extract - 4 March 2010 26
Figure 2.3.3.1.C: Adults - Ambulatory - Discharge - HoNOS AUS NSW VIC 100 92 93 93 80 75 57 57 65 63 50 45 32 34 38 25 Percentage Completed 0 100 75 50 25 0 100 75 50 25 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 QLD WAU SAU 71 70 70 76 77 77 78 70 62 56 58 60 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 TAS ACT NTE 87 73 57 49 37 38 41 46 35 29 22 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Graphs by Jurisdiction - Data Extract - 12 April 2010 27
Figure 2.3.3.2.C: Adults - Ambulatory - Discharge - LSP-16 AUS NSW VIC 100 75 50 25 43 42 50 50 25 26 34 31 67 62 70 65 Percentage Completed 0 100 75 50 25 0 100 75 50 25 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 QLD WAU SAU 60 59 58 63 50 43 42 45 33 34 40 29 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 TAS ACT NTE 100 83 76 9 13 12 11 45 50 48 49 41 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Graphs by Jurisdiction - Data Extract - 12 April 2010 28
Figure 2.3.3.4.C: Adults - Ambulatory - Discharge - Diagnosis AUS NSW VIC 97 91 100 86 86 80 80 78 77 72 68 75 74 72 50 25 Percentage Completed 0 100 75 50 25 0 100 75 50 25 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 QLD WAU SAU 98 98 97 95 97 99 98 98 99 99 99 99 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 TAS ACT NTE 86 86 88 90 82 76 76 82 84 79 81 0 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 0506 0607 0708 0809 Graphs by Jurisdiction - Data Extract - 12 April 2010 29
Progress to date Most of our efforts have been about bedding down routine outcome measurement, workforce training & information infrastructure; Major obstacle has been linking the NOCC (who gets) with the NMDS for Admitted Patient and Community Mental Health Care; Some progress with NOCC 1.6 aligning the patient identifiers but: 90% of cases in NOCC account for 67% of CMHC data Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 30
Matching of 2008 2009 CMHC & NOCC
John Venn, MA FRS Fellow and Lecturer in Moral Science, Cambridge
Critical appraisal & peer review No one, not even John Venn's best friend would argue that his underlying idea is very deep. Venn's innovation, however, took immeasurably less brainpower than, for instance, Archimedes' determination of spherical surface. The latter required extraordinary insight. The former might just as well have been discovered by a child with a crayon. Professor William Dunham (1999), The Mathematical Universe
Challenges Ahead Does one size fits all? Some argue strongly that AR-DRGs the way to go; AR-DRGs simple to administer; specialist classifications like MH-CASC more complicated Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 34
Some indicative comparisons: % RIV Completed Inpatient Episodes 1997 AR-DRGs (V3) costs 11.3% (8 classes); 1997 MH-CASC costs 17.3% (9 classes); 2009 AR-DRGs (V6) LOS 15.1% (9 classes); 2009 MH-CASC LOS 22.7% Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 35
But, for example There is a single DRG for Childhood Disorders age is not relevant and other DRG classes are available (so 9 classes); MH-CASC has 3 classes for Child & Adolescents, and includes age, diagnosis and the single HoNOSCA scale, Aggressive Disruptive Behaviours; AR-DRG for Kids 8.7% (LOS) MH-CASC - 3.2% Potentially artefact of more DRG classes Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 36
Challenges Ahead AR-DRGs are designed for acute inpatient care much of the work in mental health occurs in ambulatory settings; Key issues: How to deal with missing data: no diagnosis, no classification (and worse no payment!); About 15% of completed inpatient episodes have no principal diagnosis Classification development work very expensive and time consuming years rather than months Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 37
Challenges ahead Making sure we define to product of mental health care right: Person or Period of Care or Episode of Care? Have we got our measures right NOCC is based on work done 15 years ago? But new measures will cost! May be too ambitious? Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 38
Challenges ahead How do we make sure the classification work proceeds balancing time constraints, funding imperatives while not compromising the goal of understanding variation? Perverse incentives gaming etc more likely to yield phoney classifications Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 39
Challenges ahead Mental health will need to demonstrate that alternative, mental health specific casemix tools justify the additional costs of collection: Quality improvement; Benchmarking; and Demonstrating better outcomes through using these tools Mental Health Outcomes in Australia: The future of information development in practice 40
Cut down in his prime, aged 88 years. Sigh you really would have hoped for more
But fondly remembered by his students & colleagues The stained glass in Caius Hall at Cambridge University commemorating the life, the passion & the vision of John Venn