Industries Association. ERCOT Successes and Challenges



Similar documents
Grid Operations and Planning

Experience in Electricity Market Restructuring. Texas: Mostly Good. Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates And University of Texas at Austin.

Texas Demand Response Programs Cirro Energy Services an NRG Energy Company

Electricity Supply. Monthly Energy Output by Fuel Type (MWh)

ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update

Market Design 2009: The Texas Deregulated Electricity Market. September 17, 2009 Commissioner Donna L. Nelson Public Utility Commission of Texas, USA

ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (March 2014) ERCOT Public April 15, 2014

Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Interconnection

The Market Guide. An introductory guide to how the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) facilitates the competitive power market

2010 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT

Retail Competition in Texas: A Success Story

Optimizing Wind Generation in ERCOT Nodal Market Resmi Surendran ERCOT Chien-Ning Yu ABB/Ventyx Hailong Hui ERCOT

Convergence of Wholesale And Retail Markets: The Texas Experience

City Council Briefing. June 16, 2010

Electric Market National Overview

Update on Texas Restructuring. NAESB Conference September 24, 2002 Baltimore, MD Chairman, Rebecca Klein

SOLAR PURCHASE POWER AGREEMENT (PPA) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. UPDATED: October 28, 2015

Using Demand Response Programs to Provide Operating Reserves in Wholesale Power Markets: A Case Study of the ERCOT Market

Retail Market IT Services Service Level Agreement

Ontario Wholesale Electricity Market Price Forecast. Ontario Energy Board

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

A Guide to Net Energy Metering and Your Billing Process

Natural Gas and Electricity Coordination Experiences and Challenges

PG&E and Renewable Energy. Chuck Hornbrook Senior Manager Solar and Customer Generation

Energy and Consumer Impacts of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Prepared for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

Texas Electricity Basics

Energy Future Holdings Reports First Quarter 2013 Results

ERCOT EWTG Tracking Excess Generation from DG solar PV (and related data) Larry Howe Texas Solar Energy Society Board Member Jan 2015

NEVADA S ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR): 2015 Reboot. Prepared For EMA 2014 Annual Meeting Oct 23, 2014

Unlocking Electricity Prices:

Grid Applications for Energy Storage

ConnectivityWeek 2010

2014 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT ERCOT WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POTOMAC ECONOMICS, LTD. Independent Market Monitor for the ERCOT Wholesale Market

PJM Electric Market. PJM Electric Market: Overview and Focal Points. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Market Oversight

Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan to 2025: An Update of the 2020 Plan

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Hawai i s PV Challenge/Opportunity

Wind and Energy Markets: A Case Study of Texas.

2013 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT ERCOT WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POTOMAC ECONOMICS, LTD. Independent Market Monitor for the ERCOT Wholesale Market

Your guide to electricity pricing in Ontario

Understanding Electricity Pricing

Anticipating Compliance Strategies and Forecasts for Satisfying Clean Power Plan Requirements

Demand Response, Dynamic Pricing, and the Smart Grid in New York

Austin Energy Quarterly Report. Austin Energy. April 26, Mission: Deliver clean, affordable, reliable energy and excellent customer service.

Energy Management. Electric Procurement Strategies. August 27, 2007

How To Manage The Ercot Grid

Electricity Costs White Paper

UNDERSTANDING YOUR UTILITY BILL A GUIDE FOR BUSINESSES IN OHIO

RE-POWERING MARKETS Market design and regulation during the transition to low-carbon power systems

Concepts and Experiences with Capacity Mechanisms

Consumer Cost Effectiveness of CO 2 Mitigation Policies in Restructured Electricity Markets. Jared Moore and Jay Apt.

B O A R D M E E T I N G N a s h v i l l e, T e n n e s s e e November 6, 2014

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport District Energy Plant Upgrades Project Making More with Less Sustainable Communities Conference Dallas, TX

Presentation to the Staff Subcommittee on Gas 2010 NARUC Winter Committee Meetings Washington, D.C. February 14, 2010

Disclaimer: All costs contained within this report are indicative and based on latest market information. 16 th March 2015

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

NYC Solar Workshop NYSERDA s Programs

POLICY FEEDING RENEWABLE. How the Energy Bill might affect green electricity suppliers and also renewable generators

HVDC Transmission Line Project for Moving ERCOT Wind Into SERC

ERCOT Long-Term System Assessment. Executive Summary

Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs in the United States

Measurement and Mitigation of Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets

Calculating the Business Case for Demand Response

Overview of Long Island Electric Service Territory

Power Tariff Structure in Thailand 23 October 2012, Singapore Dr. Pallapa Ruangrong Energy Regulatory Commission of Thailand

April 22 CBCG Status Report: Data Collection, Modeling Assumptions

Enabling 24/7 Automated Demand Response and the Smart Grid using Dynamic Forward Price Offers

AOBA Utility Committee

Local Solar. bikeriderlondon / Shutterstock.com. Local Solar Power

Rapid Prototyping Reveals

Fiscal Year 2011 Resource Plan

PECO Default Service Program - RFP Data Room Data Series Overview: General Descriptions and Assumptions February 13, 2015

ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM (EMR) & THE ENERGY BILL INENCO OVERVIEW

Workshop B. 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Making Energy Storage Work for The Pacific Northwest

Nodal Exchange Contract Specifications

Proposed Rates Mandates & Reliability

Appendix D: Electricity Price Forecast Preliminary Draft

Economic Analysis of Ohio s Renewable and Energy Efficiency Standards

2016 ERCOT System Planning Long-Term Hourly Peak Demand and Energy Forecast December 31, 2015

Benefits of AMI/HAN for Retail Electric Providers Glen Stancil VP, Retail Planning and Development

From: Steve Berberich, Vice President of Technology and Corporate Services and Chief Financial Officer

Methodology For Illinois Electric Customers and Sales Forecasts:

State of Renewables. US and state-level renewable energy adoption rates:

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

Perspectives on Texas Efforts

How To Plan For A New Power Plant In Manitoba

Texas transformed. Achieving significant savings through a new electricity market management system

THE COMED RESIDENTIAL REAL-TIME PRICING PROGRAM GUIDE TO REAL-TIME PRICING

Attached are the Board materials in relation to these agenda items. Item ERCOT Public

Understanding Your Bill

Assessing Natural Gas Supply

7 th TYNDP WS. The role of storage in a liberalized market. Georg Dorfleutner RAG Energy Storage GmbH

Energy Forecast UPDATE TO THE WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECAST

I. FORECAST METHODOLOGY

Resource Management Spreadsheet Capabilities. Stuart Dixon Resource Manager

An Introduction to Alberta s Financial Electricity Market

Transcription:

Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association ERCOT Successes and Challenges Laura Doll Board Chair Electric Reliability Council of Texas November 7, 2011

ERCOT Overview The ERCOT market covers roughly 85% of Texas overall power usage Record peak demand: 68,379 MW Occurred on August 3, 2011 Total installed wind capacity of 9,500 MW 33,921 MW of new wind capacity generation requests under review Wind generation record: 7,400 MW Representing 15.2% of load Occurred on October 7, 2011 at 3:06 pm 2

Summer 2011 A Record-breaking Year New Peak Demand Record: 68,379 megawatts, August 3, 2011-4 percent increase over 2010 record The 2010 peak demand 65,776 MW, Aug. 23, 2010 was broken 3 consecutive days: - Aug. 1 66,867 MW - Aug. 2 67,929 MW - Aug. 3 68,379 MW New Weekend Record: 65,159 MW, Sunday August 28-5 percent increase over 2010 previous record 62,320 MW ERCOT Monthly Records since May 2011 September 63,184 MW (Sept. 2); beats previous record of 59,524524 MW by 6.1 percent July 65,195 MW; beats previous record of 63,400 MW (July 13, 2009) by 7.8 percent June 63,102 MW; beats previous record of 62,278 MW (June 25, 2009) by 3.8 percent May 57,356 MW ; beats previous record of 56,344 MW (May 23, 2008) by 4.8 percent 3

Summer 2011 Nine ERCOT EEAs, Demand Growth 2011 ENERGY EMERGENCY ALERTS Feb. 2 EEA 1-3 March 23 EEA 1 June 27 EEA 1 Aug. 2 EEA 1 Aug. 3 EEA 1 Aug. 4 EEA 1-2 Aug. 5 EEA 1 Aug. 23 EEA 1 Aug. 24 EEA 1-2 2010 ENERGY EMERGENCY ALERTS May 15 EEA 1 June 23 EEA 1 DATE PEAK DEMAND, MW 8/3/2011 68,379 3.96% 8/23/2010 65,776 6.02% 7/13/2009 63,400 3.73% 8/4/2008 62,171 0.07% 07% 8/13/2007 62,130-0.34% 8/17/2006 62,339 3.53% 8/23/2005 60,214 2.92% 8/3/2004 58,506-2.55% 8/7/2003 60,037 7.04% 8/26/2002 56,086 2.53% CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR 8/15/2001 54,729-4.99% 8/31/2000 57,606 5.03% 4

Summer Peak Forecasting challenge #1: what weather should we assume? Normal Weather 63,898 MW 5

Other Growth Indicators in ERCOT ERCOT is currently tracking 185 generation interconnection requests totaling over 59,000 MW. o Includes almost 34,000 MW of wind generation ERCOT is currently reviewing proposed transmission i improvements with a total t cost of $117.9 million All transmission projects (in engineering, routing, licensing and construction) total approximately $9.8 billion -Transmission projects endorsed in 2011 total $579.9 million -Projects energized in 2011 total about $695 million 6

Generation Interconnection Activity by Fuel MW Natural Gas MW Nuclear MW Coal MW Wind MW Solar * MW Biomass * MW Other Total # Projects # Projects Cancelled 120,000 * Prior to September 2008, Category "Other" included "Solar" and "Biomass" Projects in all phases of interconnection study are reflected in this graph Project cancellation tracking by month began in March 2008 300 100,000 250 80,000 000 200 Project Count 60,000 150 MW Capacity 40,000 100 20,000 50 0 0 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 7

Resource Adequacy Requires New Tools: ERCOT Developing Capacity-Demand-Reserve Improvements Using High, medium and low economic forecasts Improving information about expected output during EEAs Assigning probability-weighted capacities for committed new generation Will tend to lower projected reserve margins; changes to generation interconnection process will eliminate inactive projects Graph is based on May 2011 CDR and does not include CSAPR impacts or other updates 8

ERCOT Is Pursuing Multiple Options to Address Resource Adequacy Capacity Demand Reserve (CDR) analysis Bring mothballed units to RMR Increase Demand Response Increase Imports across DC ties Block Load Transfers Private Use Network Capacity/Un-modeled Generation Storage (CAES, batteries, EVs) Reporting on impacts to resources (fuel, water, emissions, new construction) Better Outage Coordination (NPRR 365) PUCT: Resolution of Pricing Issues Related to Reliability Deployments Implementation of Look-ahead pricing (phase 1 of Look-Ahead SCED) 9

A Key Element for ERCOT Planning: Wind Performance Is Growing and Maturing and Nodal Helps Wind generation in 2011 is up 18% over same period in 2010 Total wind generation has been higher every month Why? Increased contribution from South Zone/Coastal wind where there are fewer transmission constraints The nodal market, with its unit-specific dispatch every five minutes, allows ERCOT to operate the system so that transmission flows to are closer to limits (higher). This is due to more certainty that flows won t violate limits. Instead of telling everything in the west to reduce output, ERCOT can be more specific; we can more fully utilize the limited transmission we have; nodal market is allowing us to absorb more renewable energy 10

Monthly Wind Production Wind Production (GWh) 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 West / North South 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2008 2009 2010 2011 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ed Capacity (GW) Install 11

ERCOT Daily Wind Output at System Peak 3,283 MW 12

Wind Capacity Installed by Year 12,000 MW 10,000 8,000 6,000 Cumulative MW Installed Cumulative Planned (Signed Interconnection Agreement) ERCOT Wind Installations by Year (as of September 30, 2011) The data presented here is based upon the latest registration data provided to ERCOT by the resource owners and can change without notice. Any capacity changes will be reflected in current and subsequent years' totals. Scheduling delays will also be reflected in the planned projects as that information is received. 4,785 8,005 8,916 9,400 9,700 300 10,953 1553 1,553 11,155 11,155 1,755 1,755 4,000 This chart now reflects planned units in calendar year of installation rather than installation by peak of year shown 2,875 2000 2,000 816 977 1,173 1,385 1,854 0 116 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 13

Location of Installed Wind Capacity and Interconnection Requests Wind only 14

Wind Performance by Zones Is Increasingly Important 15

Recent Observed Wind Ramps in ERCOT Predicting Ramps is a big challenge Ramp down on June 27, 2011 Ramp of ~3500 MW in 2 hours 16

Wind Ramps in ERCOT: big differences in little time Ramp up on July 5, 2011 Ramp of ~3500 MW in 3 hours 17

ERCOT s Approach to Integrating Wind CREZ is on track ERCOT focus is on integration: Forecasting and predicting large wind ramps Incorporating uncertainty into reserves and resource planning Non-spin is the greatest uncertainty Nodal allows better response and posturing of the system Incorporating historical wind power forecast error and wind generator output behavior in the Ancillary Service requirements determination has been key in ensuring sufficient reserves multiple tools which cover different time frames have been key in providing operators with the necessary level of system awareness and different types of information 18

Retail Market almost 10 years old how are we doing? The Texas retail market has been open to competition for almost 10 years. So how are we doing? In 2010 ABBACUS report, an assessment of restructured electricity markets in Canada and the US, Texas was the only jurisdiction to earn the top ranking of Excellent in both the Residential and Commercial/Industrial segments. 176 competitive retailers up from five in 2002 Most retail customers may choose from more than 35 REPs, offering as many as 226 different rate packages Diverse products Fixed, Variable, Indexed, 100% Green May choose whether to participate in energy efficiency programs, demand response programs, distributed generation programs, etc. 19

Retail Customers with a Non-legacy Retail Electric Provider 56 % of residential load (as of Sept. 2011) 82 % of small commercial load (as of Sept. 2011) 20

ERCOT has managed more than 43.9 million retail switching transactions ERCOT successfully manages millions of transactions every day, every month. More than 43.9 million retail switching transactions completed since June 2001 ERCOT is the only ISO/RTO with responsibilities as registration agent for retail transactions 21

ERCOT Advanced Meter Installations AMI Meter Deployment Plan 2.97 million advanced anced meters now deployed ed by 3 investor-owned o ned TDSPs 22

AMI settlement keeping pace ERCOT is now settling nearly 2.7 million 3000000 ESIIDs with 15-minute Advanced Meter Data 2500000 2000000 AMS ESI IDs in Settlement 1500000 1000000 500000 0 Nov 2009 Dec 2009 Jan 2010 Feb 2010 Mar 2010 Apr 2010 May 2010 Jun 2010 Jul 2010 Aug 2010 Sep 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 First Operating Day Settling Advanced Meters: November 29, 2009 263 ESIIDs Current Status: March 31, 2011 2,693,726 ESIIDs 23

Demand Response potential FERC estimates t >18 GW of DR potential ti in Texas by 2019 Attributed to high peak demand Would represent 20-25% of ERCOT peak Full participation scenario assumes default dynamic pricing tariff Source: FERC 2009 National Assessment of DR, page 42 24

Off-peak vs. on-peak load by customer type Wed., Aug. 3, 2011 5:00 PM ERCOT Load: 68,416 MW Temperature in Dallas: 109 Wed., March 9, 2011 5:15 PM ERCOT Load: 31,262 MW Temperature in Dallas: 64 Residential 51.2% (~35,000 MW) Customer class breakdown is for competitive choice areas; percentages are extrapolated for NOIEs to achieve region-wide estimate Large C&I are IDR Meter Required (>700kW) Residential 27.4% (~8,500 MW) Small Commercial 25.2% Small Commercial 28.9% Large C&I 43.7% Large C&I 23.7% 3/9/2011 IE 17:15 8/3/2011 IE 17:00 25

Residential & small commercial DR opportunities Small Loads are driving summer peaks but not much is harnessed for DR yet No residential load currently in ERCOT-administered DR 15-minute interval meter data, combined with ERCOT settlement data at the wholesale market level, is the smart grid backbone for the ERCOT region Price elasticity of demand has reliability value even if it is not dispatched by ERCOT In the Nodal market,,prices and shortage conditions are aligning gbetter than in the old Zonal market $3,000/MWh prices across the peak on Aug. 4 26

Energy Storage Current Regulatory Initiatives Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 943 incorporating energy storage into the wholesale power market; intended to clarify that storage can be classified as generation. PUCT Project No. 39657 implementing SB 943; will add language to PUCT rules to conform to statute. PUCT Project No. 39764, Issues Relating to Energy Storage and Emerging Technologies, workshop held October 6 ERCOT is proposing pilot program option that would allow for testing of fast-responding, duration-limited resources. Currently being considered by PUCT. 27

States included in the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) 28

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) CSAPR was released on July 6, 2011, and was published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2011. ERCOT is reviewing the potential impacts of the final CSAPR on generation resources and transmission system reliability in the ERCOT region. The proposed CSAPR rule, (then known as the Clean Air Transport Rule [CATR]), only included d Texas in the peak season NOX program. Based on this proposed rule, an ERCOT study completed on June 21 2011 did not include any incremental impacts from the CATR. In the final rule, Texas is included in the annual SO2 and annual NOX programs, as well as the peak season NOX program. For Texas, the annual SO2 limits appear to be the most restrictive. Rule is effective January 1, 2012. ERCOT s initial analysis focused on near-term reliability implications. 29

CSAPR Rule Requirements CSAPR affects generating units in most of the eastern US. Under CSAPR, generating units must have CSAPR allowances to match annual emissions of SO2 and NOX and separate allowances for peak season (May Sept.) NOX emissions. Units are allocated a number of allowances based on historical generation. Trading of allowances within a state is unlimited. Interstate trading of allowances is allowed, but net state-wide imports of allowances are capped at approximately 18% of a state s total allocation. For SO2 allowances, owners of resources in Texas will be allowed to trade with owners of resources in the Group 2 states: Kansas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina Based on information obtained to date, ERCOT does not anticipate the emergence of an active market for trading of Group 2 SO2 allowances. 30

CSAPR Update ERCOT is analyzing the reliability impact of the proposed changes in the CSAPR rule announced by the EPA on October 6, 2011. The changes did not alter the rule s January 1, 2012 implementation date and do not revise modeling errors that ERCOT has reported inaccurately reflect actual conditions on the ERCOT electric grid. The announced revisions arise from changes in unit-specific assumptions that effectively increase Texas SO2 budget. ERCOT is gathering information from generators regarding changes in their compliance plans reported to ERCOT after the initial adoption of CSAPR. Impacts are a moving target. 31

Reliability Implications from CSAPR Scenario 1 ERCOT has developed three possible CSAPR impact scenarios Scenario 1 models successful implementation of the compliance plans of the resource owners. Under this scenario, the incremental capacity reductions are expected to be approximately 3,000 MW in the off-peak months (March, April, October and November) and approximately 1,200 1,400 MW in the peak months. Capacity reductions in off-peak months are expected to be greater because power prices are lower during these periods, making them a more attractive time for resource owners to take the extended outages required to comply with the Rule. In 2011, if ERCOT had experienced the incremental reductions in available a ab generation e expected to result from CSAPR, customers s in the ERCOT region would have experienced rolling outages in August. 32

Other CSAPR Uncertainties Resource owners have not finalized their compliance strategies. System impacts could be affected by changes in specific unit operations. Reliability impacts in 2013 & 2014 will be greater as unit retrofit projects are implemented. Retrofit projects will require Clean Air Act permit modifications. CSAPR will affect national fuel markets, increasing demand for natural gas and low sulfur coals. Near-term demand will likely exceed existing mine and/or railroad capacity. ERCOT does not expect a liquid market for SO2 allowances. Resource owners may sell allowances outside ERCOT, increasing reliability impacts. Bottom line: this is good for renewable energy! 33

Keep up with ERCOT: new communications options ERCOT home page: Follow us on Facebook or Twitter Subscribe to RSS feeds See real time grid conditions 34

Social media engagement with ERCOT on the rise 35

ERCOT: So much is going right! Nodal market Wind performance Managing weather extremes New technologies entering the market CREZ transmission in construction; other transmission being built Wind and load forecasting enhancements AMI installations on track Texas retail market appears robust Leadership and collaboration 36

ERCOT has big challenges and uncertainties Growth Integrating more renewable energy Drought/weather extremes Impact of environmental regulations (e.g., CSAPR) Impact of new technologies 37

But ONE thing is for sure... 433... days til the next Texas Legislative session! 38

Questions? 39