Attached are the Board materials in relation to these agenda items. Item 4.3 1 ERCOT Public



Similar documents
Item 8.1: Third Quarter 2013KPIs Update

The Finance & Audit (F&A) Committee is expected to consider F&A Committee Agenda Item 4: at its meeting on December 7, 2015.

Information Technology Service Availability Metrics

Information Technology Service Availability Metrics

ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (March 2014) ERCOT Public April 15, 2014

Issue for the ERCOT Board of Directors

Market Data Transparency Service Level Agreement

The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) manages the flow of electric power to approximately 22 million Texas customers representing 85

Texas Nodal Program Update. Jerry Sullivan Executive Director, Texas Nodal Program. Board of Directors Meeting May

Optimizing Wind Generation in ERCOT Nodal Market Resmi Surendran ERCOT Chien-Ning Yu ABB/Ventyx Hailong Hui ERCOT

Texas transformed. Achieving significant savings through a new electricity market management system

Item 3: ERCOT Strategic Goals

Issue for the ERCOT Board of Directors

Presentation for The National Commission for Energy State Regulation of Ukraine

The Market Guide. An introductory guide to how the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) facilitates the competitive power market

Industries Association. ERCOT Successes and Challenges

Convergence of Wholesale And Retail Markets: The Texas Experience

Mike Petterson, Vice President of Finance and Treasury Subject: 2010 Audited Financial Statements. Issue for the ERCOT Board of Directors

ERCOT Design and Implementation of Internal Controls and benefits for NERC CMEP/RAI

Retail Market IT Services Service Level Agreement

Summary of CIP Version 5 Standards

Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Interconnection

SOP-RTMKTS Test and Approve Operations Software Applications. Contents

Procedure for Nominating Renewable Energy Credit Offsets

Perceived Areas of Improvement Action Plan Steps to address Action Plan Projected Completion Date. Put hyperlink to survey on Dispute Service

TRANSMISSION OPERATIONS (August 5, 2010)

Demand Response FAQs

2013 Ventyx, an ABB company

Introduction to the Integrated Marketplace

Transmission Function Employees Job Titles and Descriptions 18 C.F.R 358.7(f)(1)

Duke Energy Progress Standards of Conduct Transmission Function Employee Job Titles and Job Descriptions 9/1/13

Demand Response Frequently Asked Questions (Last Updated 02/23/16)

Resource Monitoring and Deliverability Tool Paper

Chapter 7 System Operations and Physical Markets

Risks and Controls for VAR and EOP Richard Shiflett Ruchi Ankleshwaria

The Requirements Compliance Matrix columns are defined as follows:

Energy in the Wholesale Market December 5, :30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Irving, Texas Robert Burke, Principal Analyst ISO New England

North American Electric Reliability Corporation: Critical Infrastructure Protection, Version 5 (NERC-CIP V5)

Operational Security Network Code

Service Restoration Priorities Plan - PUC Workshop. Kent Saathoff Vice President of Grid Operations and System Planning

San Diego Gas & Electric Company FERC Order 717 Transmission Function Employee Job Descriptions June 4, Electric Grid Operations

PHYSICIANS REIMBURSEMENT FUND, INC. A Risk Retention Group. APPLICATION MD & DO Locum Tenens. 1. First Name: Middle Initial: Last Name:

San Diego Gas & Electric Company FERC Order 717 Transmission Function Employee Job Descriptions. Electric Grid Operations

ConnectivityWeek 2010

PJM LMP Market Overview

Semi-Annual Audit, Compliance, and Enterprise Risk Management Update

Sample Business Associate Agreement (4. Other Bus. Assoc., Version )

Grid of the Future. Integration of Renewables Energy Storage Smart Grid. Presentation by David Hawkins Lead Renewables Power Engineer Grid Operations

San Diego Gas & Electric Company FERC Order 717 Transmission Function Employee Job Descriptions August 10, Electric Grid Operations

2016 Business Plan and Budget. Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Approved by Texas RE Board of Directors. Date: May 21, 2015

Role of CIM for Power System Model Exchange - ISO/RTO Exchanges with TOs

CenterPoint Energy Robert B. Frazier Director of Electric Technology

TRANSMISSION GRID DEVELOPMENT & PORTFOLIO SERVICES December 22, Senior Vice President Trans Grid Development & Portfolio Services

Market Design 2009: The Texas Deregulated Electricity Market. September 17, 2009 Commissioner Donna L. Nelson Public Utility Commission of Texas, USA

How To Understand The Service Level Terms Of A Network Connection In Australia

Model Renewable Energy Wheeling Agreement under Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) scheme

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Product Management Update

Grid Operations and Planning

DISPATCH AGREEMENT RECITALS

Section 4: Scheduling Philosophy & Tools

Control Number : Item Number: 4. Addendum StartPage : 0

ECCO International, Inc. 268 Bush Street, Suite 3633 San Francisco, CA 94104

Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC Release No ; File No. S ; RIN 3235-AL07

DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Top Ten Compliance Issues for Implementing the NERC CIP Reliability Standard

Release User Group Agenda

How To Understand The Service Level Terms Of A Co-Location Service Level In Korea

Control Number : Item Number: 36. Addendum StartPage : 0

Oncor s Pioneering Transmission Dynamic Line Rating (DLR) Demonstration Lays Foundation for Follow-On Deployments

Attachment 2 Performance Metrics

Credit Management and the ERCOT Nodal Market

Update on Texas Restructuring. NAESB Conference September 24, 2002 Baltimore, MD Chairman, Rebecca Klein

Retail Choice In Electricity Markets

Chapter 9 Settlements and Billing

New York State of the Market System - NYISO Success Project

2015 PROJECT ROADMAP. Bill Pettitt. April 16, Manager, Business Solutions, IESO

Business Plan in 2015 of Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators, Japan

ATTACHMENT G. Network Operating Agreement

ISACA North Dallas Chapter

Transmission Grid Reliability And Performance Monitoring

Texas Retail Market Testing Flight Market Participant Retail Testing Orientation

Dynamic Thermal Ratings in Real-time Dispatch Market Systems

DOCKET NO. TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY AND THE ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS

Top 10 Compliance Issues for Implementing Security Programs

PJM Overview and Wholesale Power Markets. John Gdowik PJM Member Relations

Different types of electricity markets modelled using PLEXOS Integrated Energy Model The UK Balancing Market example

ERCOT Retail Market Guide. July 1, 2012

Last revised: September 1, 2014 TRANSMISSION FUNCTION TITLES AND JOB DESCRIPTIONS

Overview of the IESO-Administered Markets. IESO Training. Updated: January, Public

Bogdan Vesovic Siemens Smart Grid Solutions, Minneapolis, USA

1. No objection - although Edmonton meetings are always appreciated.

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT

Master/Local Control Center Procedure No. 13 (M/LCC 13) Communications Between the ISO and Local Control Centers

SPP ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) System Requirements V1.6

Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call

The Materials Contained Are Property of GP Renewables & Trading, LLC and are considered proprietary. This is not for distribution.

Multi-Faceted Solution for Managing Flexibility with High Penetration of Renewable Resources

SEC STATEMENT OF POLICY ON MODERNIZATION OF ELECTRICITY GRID.

Energy Imbalance Market

Transcription:

The Human Resources & Governance (HR&G) Committee is expected to consider HR&G Committee Agenda Item 4.3: Recommendation regarding Proposed 2016 ERCOT Key Performance Indicators (s) at its meeting on December 7, 2015. The Board of Directors is expected to hear the HR&G Committee s recommendation on this matter as part of the HR&G Committee Report at the Board meeting on December 8, 2015. Attached are the Board materials in relation to these agenda items. Item 4.3 1 ERCOT Public

Date: December 1, 2015 To: Board of Directors From: H.B. Trip Doggett, President and Chief Executive Officer Subject: 2016 ERCOT Key Performance Indicators (s) Issue for the ERCOT Board of Directors ERCOT Board of Directors Meeting Date: December 8, 2015 Item No.: 11.1 Issue: Whether the Board of Directors (Board) of Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. (ERCOT) should approve the 2016 ERCOT s as recommended by ERCOT staff. Background/History: The ERCOT leadership team annually develops specific key performance indicators and corresponding target metrics to drive performance of the organization. The indicators, along with their specific measurements are outlined in the 2016 s. The s are reviewed on a quarterly basis and are used to measure the successful performance of the organization. It is important that the leadership team and the ERCOT Board of Directors (Board) are aligned on the specific goals and focus of ERCOT for 2016. The Human Resource and Governance (HR&G) Committee is expected to consider whether to recommend that the Board approve the 2016 s as presented at its meeting on December 7, 2015. A copy of the proposed 2016 Matrix is attached hereto as Attachment A. Key Factors Influencing Issue: The 2016 s correlate to ERCOT s strategic direction of the Board and provide performance measures to the Board and ERCOT leadership and staff. Conclusion/Recommendation: The ERCOT leadership team recommends that the HR&G Committee recommend approval and that the ERCOT Board approve the 2016 s as presented. 1 ERCOT Public

ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION WHEREAS, after due consideration of the alternatives, the Board of Directors (Board) of Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. (ERCOT) deems it desirable and in the best interest of ERCOT to accept the recommendations of ERCOT staff and the Human Resources and Governance Committee to approve the 2016 ERCOT Key Performance Indicators (s) attached hereto as Attachment A; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2016 ERCOT s, attached hereto as Attachment A, are hereby authorized and approved. CORPORATE SECRETARY S CERTIFICATE I, Vickie G. Leady, Assistant Corporate Secretary of ERCOT, do hereby certify that, at its December 8, 2015 meeting, the ERCOT Board passed a motion approving the above Resolution by. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of December, 2015. Vickie G. Leady Assistant Corporate Secretary 2 ERCOT Public

2016 Proposed Key Performance Indicators (s) RG 1 Grid Security Management / Real Time System Control / Scheduling & Dispatch Control Performance Standard 1 (CPS1) frequency control performance (rolling 12 month CPS1 score). > 140 > 150 RG 2 Grid Security Management / Real Time System Control / Scheduling & Dispatch Interconnection Reliability Operating Limit (IROL) exceedance limitations. None longer than 20 minutes None longer than 10 minutes RG 3 Outage Coordination / Planning Outage Coordination performance: requests approved or denied within timeline and with mitigation plans developed if required. 97% 99% RG 4 Forecasting Operations Load Forecast performance - Mean Average Percent Error (MAPE): monthly average day ahead load forecasts used for DRUC MAPE. All less than 4.0% All less than 3.5% RG 5 Forecasting Wind forecast performance - MAPE based on installed wind capacity: monthly average day ahead wind forecasts used for DRUC MAPE. All less than 15% All less than 10% RG 6 Day, Betty Compliance Monitoring & Reporting RG 7 Day, Betty Compliance Monitoring & Reporting RG 8 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Achieve full compliance with NERC/FERC planning and operating standards, OPS, Protocols. Assure property, personnel, and cyber assets are protected (cyber and physical) in accordance with NERC CIP Standards and SSAE16 Controls. Energy Management System Aggregate No more than 1 high severity and no more than 3 total exceptions from NERC Standards as found in a NERC Compliance Audit excluding current registration mitigation plan regarding TOP. No exceptions from NERC Standards Replace - see additions below as found in a NERC Compliance Audit. No more than 1 high severity and no more than 3 total alleged violations from NERC Standards as found in a NERC or TRE initiated CIP CMEP in No alleged violations from NERC 2015. Standards as found in a NERC or TRE SSAE16 - No more than 1 exception in initiated CIP CMEP in 2015. logical or physical security controls and an unqualified opinion in logical or physical security controls. Replace - see additions below Replace - see additions below RG 9 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) 99.9% 99.95% ERCOT Public 1

2016 Proposed Key Performance Indicators (s) RG 10 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services RG 11 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED): number of unplanned outages greater than 30 consecutive minutes (per quarter) Load Frequency Control (LFC) zero n/a 99.9% 99.95% Replace - see additions below RG 12 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Load Frequency Control (LFC): number of unplanned outages greater than 30 consecutive minutes (per quarter) zero n/a Replace - see additions below RG 13 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Outage Scheduler RG 14 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Network Model Management System (NMMS). RG_i 15 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services HRUC executed every hour: percent of complete HRUC s per month, including ones missed due to database loads and site failover. RG_i 16 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services No loss of VSAT/TSAT application functionality for 30 continuous minutes or longer, excluding invalid solutions due to State Estimator dependencies and planned site failovers. 3 per Quarter 1 per Quarter RG_i 17 System Planning Regional Planning project Review Studies completed on time without substantive error. 95% complete on time or no more than 1 late if less than 20 projects. 99% complete on time. RG_i 18 Transmission Connection Management Generation Interconnection Request (GIR) screening studies completed on time without errors. 95% completed on time or no more than 1 late if less than 20 GIRs 100% completed on time RG_i 19 Outage Coordination / Planning Network model update accuracy No more than 3 emergency database loads due to staff error No emergency database loads due to staff error ERCOT s capabilities of incrementally updating the production CIM model has increased since the start of Nodal mitigating the risk associated with performing emergency database loads. As the last emergency database load was in 2012, ERCOT recommends deleting RG_i19. RG_i 20 Compliance Monitoring & Reporting Required Planning Report performance No more than two reports required by PUCT Rule, DOE project, NERC or State law filed late or with error. 100% of reports required by PUCT Rule, DOE project, NERC or State law completed on time without errors. ERCOT Public 2

2016 Proposed Key Performance Indicators (s) EM 1 EM 2 DAM quality of solution as measured with price corrections: percent of hourly prices requiring DAM price correction. SCED solution is solved and posted: percent of 15-minute Settlement Interval prices where price corrections are performed. 1-3 % of time < 1 % of time 0.5% -- 1% < 0.5% EM 3 Settlement & Billing Achieve timely settlements, per Protocol defined timelines. 99% 100% EM 4 Settlement & Billing Perform accurate settlements as measured by the percent of Operating Day and operating month settlement that does not require a correction as a result of an error in the settlement and billing systems or processes. 98% 99.9% EM 5 Market Credit Credit reports are correct and posted in a timely manner. 98% 100% EM 6 Gage, Theresa Market Information Wholesale extracts available per Protocol timelines 98% 99% EM 7 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services EM 8 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Congestion Revenue Rights (CRR) Market Management System Aggregate EM_i 9 Percent of days with successful DAM execution solution completed and posted successfully. 100% n/a EM_i 10 DAM executions completed in acceptable timeframe: percent of days with posting solution before 1600. 98% 100% EM_i 11 Number of minimum Ancillary Services Requirements posted after the 20th of each month. < 2 0 As a fraction response is not possible, revise target to less than or equal to 2 instead of less than 2. ERCOT Public 3

2016 Proposed Key Performance Indicators (s) EM_i 12 Wholesale Metering, Data Collection & Data Aggregation AMS interval data is loaded into ERCOT systems by final settlement from the MRE in accordance with Protocols for data loading. 99% 99.75% EM_i 13 Wholesale Metering, Data Collection & Data Aggregation IDR meter data is loaded into ERCOT systems by true-up settlement from the 99% 99.75% MRE in accordance with Protocols for settlement. EM_i 14 Wholesale Metering, Data Collection & Data Aggregation EPS meter data is accurate and complete as measured by the percent of data that doesn t change after an initial settlement 99% 99.9% EM_i 15 CRR Management CRR auctions are performed according to Nodal Protocols Requirements (7.5.1). CRR auctions results are validated and posted as required by the CRR Activity Calendar All Monthly Auctions and LTASs are posted on time per the CRR Activity Calendar All Monthly Auctions are posted on time and all LTASs are posted one week earlier than required by the CRR Activity Calendar EM_i 16 Gage, Theresa Dispute Management Process disputes within protocol timelines 98% 100% EM_i 17 Gage, Theresa Client Services Establish and Maintain Targeted Account Plans and execute per guidelines and schedule. 98% 100% "Targeted" was used when account plans where focused on client support of wholesale market transactions, prior to combining Wholesale and Retail Client Services. ERCOT recommends revising description. EM_i 18 Gage, Theresa Account Management Achieve Very Satisfied or Satisfied ratings on annual survey of Account Management services 90% satisfied or highly satisfied 95% satisfied or highly satisfied OARC 1 Determine REC Obligations & Verify Compliance Fulfill the protocol obligations for RPS mandate calculations and reporting on time and accurately 99% 100% OARC1 addresses overall Protocol compliance for Renewable Portfolio Standard program. As ERCOT there is an overall Protocol compliance measure, ERCOT suggests deletion of this. OARC 2 Customer Switching / Registry Conduct retail transaction processing per Protocol timelines 98% 99% ERCOT Public 4

2016 Proposed Key Performance Indicators (s) OARC 3 Customer Switching / Registry End use customer switch notifications processed per PUCT rules 99% 100% OARC 4 Gage, Theresa Market Information Retail extracts available per Protocol timelines 98% 99% OARC 5 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Retail Processing - Bus. Hours 99.5% 99.7% OARC 6 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Market Information System (MIS) OARC_i 7 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Retail Processing - Non Bus. Hours OARC_i 8 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Retail API OARC_i 9 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services MarkeTrak OARC_i 10 Dispute Management Manage retail transaction issues and disputes within defined timelines 96% 98% OSM 1 Petterson, Michael Finance Manage spending to be equal to or less than the board-approved expenditure budget for 2015. Between 0 -- 5% favorable variance n/a OSM 2 Day, Betty Security OSM_i 3 Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services OSM_i 4 Magness, Bill Internal Audit OSM_i 5 Gage, Theresa Corporate Communications New Day, Betty Compliance Monitoring & Reporting New Day, Betty Compliance Monitoring & Reporting Maintain ERCOT ISO's security posture against cyber and physical security No more than one Stage 2 or Stage 3 threats as defined in the Cyber Security cyber or physical security incidents. Incident Response Plan. Operate data centers providing availability consistent with data center designed objectives. Execute the Internal Audit Plan as approved by the Finance and Audit Committee, and complete the plan by end of year. ERCOT Energy Emergency Alert Communications -- Corporate Communications provides follow-up communications and media/public notifications per Crisis Communications Procedure. Achieve compliance with NERC/FERC Standards Achieve compliance with ERCOT Protocols 99.98% 100% Zero Stage 2 or Stage 3 cyber or physical security incidents. 100% by year end 106% by year end 100% n/a No significant violations found in a NERC Compliance Audit No significant violations of ERCOT Protocols Replace - see additions below aggregate compliance measure RG6. aggregate compliance measure RG6. ERCOT Public 5

2016 Proposed Key Performance Indicators (s) New Day, Betty Compliance Monitoring & Reporting Achieve compliance with SSAE16 controls No exceptions found in an SSAE16 audit aggregate compliance measure RG7. New Day, Betty Security Maintain ERCOT ISO's security posture Zero externally reportable cyber against cyber security threats as defined security incidents in the Security Incident Response Plan security measure OSM2. New Day, Betty Security Maintain ERCOT ISO's security posture against physical security threats as defined in the Security Incident Response Plan Zero externally reportable physical security incidents security measure OSM2. New Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Energy Management System Tier 1 Aggregate All Tier 1 systems meet or exceed defined SLAs * New addition; replaces previous EMS aggregate measure RG8. New Dreyer, Jerry IT Application Services Energy Management System Tier 2 Aggregate Achieve 99% availability for 10 of 11 Tier 2 systems ** Achieve 99% availability for all Tier 2 systems New addition; replaces previous EMS aggregate measure RG8. * EMS Tier 1 includes: -- State Estimator 99.5% system availability (not including planned maintenance) and no outages greater than thirty consecutive minutes; -- Real-time Contingency Analysis (RTCM)/Transmission Constraint Management (TCM) 99.5% system availability (not including planned maintenance) and no outages greater than thirty consecutive minutes; -- Load Frequency Control (LFC) 99.9% system availability (not including planned maintenance) and no outages greater than ten consecutive minutes; -- Resource Limit Calculator (RLC) 99.9% system availability (not including planned maintenance) and no outages greater than ten consecutive minutes; and -- Grid Alarm Processor - 99.9% system availability (not including planned maintenance) and no outages greater than ten consecutive minutes. ** EMS Tier 2 includes: -- Forced Outage Protection -- Grid Network Security Analysis -- Grid Dynamic Ratings -- Grid Topology Consistency Analyzer -- Ancillary Capacity Monitor -- Wind Forecast -- Savecase Archiving -- State Estimator Statistics -- Real-time Network Analysis -- Short-term Load Forecast -- Mid-term Load Forecast ERCOT Public 6