Regulatory Reform in EU accession countries: Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment system Croatian case

Similar documents
Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) in Montenegro

Presented at the Public-Private Dialogue 2015 Workshop (Copenhagen, March 10-13, 2015)

Structure of the Administration (political and administrative system)

Government Decree No. 29/2008. (II. 19.) on the Powers and Competences of the Minister Heading the Prime Minister s Office

Assisting Economic Transition: An RIA Strategy for Developing Countries

RIA: Benefits and Application

Impact of Public Internal Financial Control on Public Administration in Croatia

Guidelines for the National IP Strategy of the Republic of Macedonia ( ) Version 2

Policy Brief. Public e-procurement at the local level in Albania. Challenges in the fight against corruption. Mona Xhexhaj

Full list of mistakes and omissions of the English Version of the Hungarian draft- Constitution

Characteristics of Public Budgets in 5 Latin American Countries

Country Report on Adult Education in CROATIA

PUBLIC SERVICE ACT An Act to make provision in respect of the public service of Lesotho and for related matters. PART I - PRELIMINARY

/ Insurance. Regional Highlights * Bosnia and Herzegovina. karanovic/nikolic. /March 2015/

provisions specified by the Preventive Law, the Cabinet of Ministers of Azerbaijan Republic has adopted the following decisions:

Securities markets regulators in transition

Joint Declaration. On the Establishment of the Regional Co-operation Council (RCC)

STANDARD TWINNING LIGHT PROJECT FICHE

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION OF KENYA

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT NO. 1 OF 1999

The Principles of Public Administration Reform

Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe

THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT. Pursuant to Article 88 of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, I hereby issue the DECISION

Law No. 67 for the year 2010

PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT NO. 1 OF 1999

Minister Shatter presents Presidency priorities in the JHA area to European Parliament

STATUTES OF CURRICULUM

THE WESTERN BALKANS LEGAL BASIS OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND INSTRUMENTS

REPORT On the work of the Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency For the year 2005

Lobbying: Sweet Smell of Success?

CITIZENS' LABOR RIGHTS PROTECTION LEAGUE N.Narimanov street, 11 \ 16, Baku AZ1006, Azerbaijan

LEGISLATION COMMITTEE OF THE CROATIAN PARLIAMENT

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR A NEW SETTLEMENT FOR THE UK WITHIN THE EU

Part 1 National Treasury

12002/15 PO/es 1 DG D 1B

The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) : achievements, shortcomings and future challenges

Tentative Action Plan

The Role and Function of a Data Protection Officer in the European Commission s Proposed General Data Protection Regulation. Initial Discussion Paper

Clearer rules for international couples frequently asked questions

Building an Institutional Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA): Guidance for Policy Makers

Law of Georgia On Normative Acts

Law on the Deposit Insurance Agency (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 14/2015) (Unofficial Translation)

Mongolia: Strengthening the Health Insurance System

Dialogue between the Government and stakeholders a crucial factor for improving Business Environment

LAW ON THE PROTECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

The Bratislava Stock Exchange IPO Overview

Rapid Market System Analysis Quality of Engineers for Multinational Enterprises (MNE s)

ISLAMIC AFFAIRS & CHARTABLE ACTIVITIES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF DUBAI

There is strong Government. Uganda: performance contracting, budget reporting and budget monitoring SUMMARY

LAW ON ELECTRICITY MARKET

CCBE POSITION ON THE PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

CHARTER of ADA University

PPIAF Assistance in Afghanistan

Presentation by Mr. Richard Bruton, Minister of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation to the IMCO Committee of the European Parliament, Brussels

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (Practical approach to certain issues which are not regulated by law and international treaties)

Not an Official Translation On Procedure of Coming into Effect of the Law of Ukraine On State Regulation of the Securities Market in Ukraine

RIA in OECD Countries

ICP 1: Conditions for Effective Insurance Supervision

CONSULTATION ON A POSSIBLE STATUTE FOR A EUROPEAN PRIVATE COMPANY (EPC)

In a Search for Regulations on Risk Management, Internal Control and Internal Audit

CROATIAN PARLIAMENT 1364

e-justice in Hungary Ferenc Zombor Deputy State Secretary Responsible for EU and International Justice Cooperation

The Corporate Governance Code for the Companies Listed on NASDAQ OMX Vilnius

NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK FOR TURKEY. Principles governing the negotiations

005ASubmission to the Serious Data Breach Notification Consultation

Restricting supplemental insurance services

Inventory of good practices

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION KOSOVO 2020 A PARTICIPATORY APPROACH

Management and Administration of SNOMED CT as a part of an Interdisciplinary Terminology for Health and Social Care

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Regulation

PROCLAMATION OF 28 SEPTEMBER AS THE INTERNATIONAL DAY FOR THE UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO INFORMATION OUTLINE

LAW ON THE BASES REGULATING SECURITY SERVICES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. ( Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 116/2007, 72/2012) I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Statistics Netherlands Act November 2003

The Law of the City of Moscow. No. 30 dated the 30 th of June On the Chamber of Control and Accounts of Moscow

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT MODEL

Corporate Governance Code

Regional Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Ukraine.

E-Commerce as a focus on the Digital Market: Turkey's Place in the World, Present Status and Steps for the Future 1

DELEGATED REGULATION (EU)

Summary of replies to the public consultation on crossborder inheritance tax obstacles within the EU and possible solutions

Equal Rights and Treatment for Roma in Moldova and Ukraine. Manual

Regulation on the implementation of the Norwegian Financial Mechanism

L A W ON THE STATE AUDIT INSTITUTION

Draft Concept Note Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea. The 2014 Busan Global Partnership Workshop 6-7 November, Seoul. 1.

Transcription:

Regulatory Reform in EU accession countries: Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment system Croatian case Version: February 2008 By: Vedran Antoljak, Managing Director vedran.antoljak@senseconsulting.eu www.senseconsulting.eu Copyright of this paper is held by: 1

Table of Contents: Introduction... 3 Legal Framework... 3 Institutional Framework... 4 Croatian RIA System... 5 The Need for Implementing RIA... 5 Current Situation with RIA in Croatia... 6 Standardization and Development of RIA System... 7 Office for the Coordination of the RIA System... 7 Methodology Summary... 8 Rules of procedures...10 Prerequisites for the Implementation of the RIA System...11 Action Plan...12 Process for development of new Laws (with integrated RIA)...14 References and literature...15 2

Introduction Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) System is an instrument designed to increase the efficiency of adopted policies and regulations in achieving their objectives, by increasing the quality of original regulatory solutions. The instrument presents a basis for reviewing and evaluating certain characteristics and alternatives in order to get a better view of the main aspects of implementing a policy, by applying specific regulatory solutions. The purpose of the RIA System is not to replace, but to improve the quality of decision making, and RIA therefore can not and must not be a substitute for decision making. The process of European integration is an unavoidable catalyst for different processes and related impacts. One of the key requirements, resulting from the European integration process, is to increase the capacity of administration to make important (numerous) decisions and develop related regulatory solutions within a relatively limited period. This further emphasizes the need for good preparation of decision making. Some of the candidate states have noticed that as much as 20% of annual regulatory activities are related to amendments and changes to existing regulations to correct their inadequacies, be they in concept or in unwanted and originally neglected implications of their implementation. Apart from being time consuming, such occurrences can also be very damaging to the economy, either due to regulatory solutions that are poor in contents and directly influence businesses, or because of indirect negative impacts that constant changes to the legal framework have on different business factors. Legal Framework RIA is still not being systematically implemented as a part of the regulatory process in Croatia, even though there are provisions whose purpose is to assess the impact of implementation of specific regulations. These are primarily based on the Rules of Procedure on the Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Government of Croatia (GOC) adopted on February 10, 2005, stipulating in Articles 10, 17, and 18 elements for obligatory assessment of the following regulatory impacts: Financial impacts; Impacts on competition and grants; Social impacts; and Environmental impacts. All proposed regulations submitted to the regulatory procedures of GOC need to contain the above regulatory impact assessments. Also, it is important to note that elements of RIA can also be recognized in Article 132 of the Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament. However, even though the Rules of Procedure of GOC bind the relevant ministries Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction only the Financial Impact Assessment (FIA) has so far been used in practice and is actively implemented and monitored by the Ministry of Finance as an obligatory attachment to all proposed decrees and other regulations adopted by GOC, as well as to all proposed acts and other regulations proposed by GOC to the Parliament. The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare has drafted the methodology and forms for assessing social impact and the proposal is currently in the process of submittal to the 3

Government, as are the standard methodology and forms for assessing environmental impact, developed by the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction. Methodology for assessing the impact on competition and grants is currently being developed by the Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship. Institutional Framework Even though the Rules of Procedure of the GOC (and Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament) prescribe regulatory impact assessments, the same Rules of Procedure, nevertheless, do not determine a unified methodology and set elements for the assessments. Thus, each of the four ministries has its own methodology, and some overlapping is to be expected. Also, the fact that there is no standardized methodology to define the minimum scope of the assessment can significantly influence the length of procedures for proposing regulations, can cause contradictions in supplying basic information of RIA, and lack of coordination between the ministries in charge. 1. experts of the organizational unit 2. Ministry s experts 3. experts from other GoC s bodies 4. experts from public and private sector 5. foreign experts PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LAWS Iniciative for preparation of new legal act IF harmonisation with EU: GoC Nacional Program Organizational Unit in the Ministry that is responsible for the required admninsitrative area Working Group for preparation of the working draft of the Law proposal WORKING DRAFT OF THE LAW PROPOSAL Compiled according to the Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament IF harmonization with EU than: Statement of compliance and comparative review Internal comments of the Ministry's organizational units To enable a systematic approach to RIA, it is essential to finalize preparations related to developing of clear procedures, standardized process steps and guidelines, internal documentations, and education of the Office for RIA staff. On the other side it is very important to develop a training curriculum for the officials and other stakeholders in the RIA system, which is currently being under implementation of the by the Office for the Coordination of the RIA System which have been established by a Government Decision on June 28, 2006. The RIA Office, in cooperation with the Legislation Office, Ministry of Finances, Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction, and the State Office for Administration, will develop a comprehensive RIA system, the concept, methodology, training curriculum, and proposed methods and procedures for RIA in the Republic of Croatia. The RIA Office will also coordinate Fiscal Impact Assessment( MOF) Ministry s staff meeting (board) Minister DRAFT LAW PROPOSAL Compiled according to the Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament Confirmation by the GOC s Office for read-proofing) Mandatory Opinion statement by MEIFA, LO, etc. according to GOC s Rules of Procedure CROATIAN GOVERNMENT 1. Expert Working Groups GOC Coordination 2. GOC Coordination 3. Croatian Government LAW PROPOSAL According to the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament CROATIAN PARLIAMENT First Reading (fast-track procedure + if harmonization with EU) Meeting of the Committee, discussion and voting on the plenary session Second Reading (common procedure within 6 months from the 1 st Reading) Meeting of the Committee, discussion and voting on the plenary session Third Reading (on the exceptional basis) Meeting of the Committee, discussion and voting on the plenary session LAW Publication in the Official Gazette (put into effect, possible enforcement delays) IF proposal is related to the State-Aid: Positive mandatory Opinion by Competition Agency (AZTN) 4

the development of a pilot-project which will serve as a reference for gaining practical knowledge and for familiarization with all tools applied in RIA. This pilot-project will then be used as a model for further training of administration employees and other stakeholders. Croatian RIA System In the process of developing decree proposals and proposals of other regulations to be adopted by GOC, as well as proposals of acts and other regulations to be proposed by GOC to the Croatian Parliament, it is necessary to implement regulatory impact assessment in practice. This is necessary to ensure quality decisions when selecting the method of adopting a regulation or a policy, as well as to engage the public already at the beginning of development process of regulatory proposals by informing them about the objectives and goals, cost and benefits, considered regulatory approach options and selected option. RIA System includes a number of techniques and procedures leading to a structured analytical approach and considerations before decisions are made on how to implement a desired policy by introducing a new or amending and changing the existing regulatory framework in a certain area. For some time now, OECD countries have been using regulatory impact assessment as an unavoidable instrument in the decision making process, while EU accession and candidate countries have also recognized the significance of this instrument and have included or are in the process of including it into their regulatory procedures. The Need for Implementing RIA The following are the main reasons for implementing RIA in Croatian legislation: SAFETY to create a system and comprehensive standards for selecting methods for adopting regulations or policies, with an aim of reviewing the demands of the market and the expected implementation of the regulation. TRANSPARENCY to build a platform for transparent, adequate and timely consultations with interest groups and the public, with the purpose of enabling all stakeholders to participate in the creation of regulations or policies. LEGALITY compliance with the legislation regarding environmental protection, health, public safety, consumer protection and public interest. EFFICIENCY improvement of work quality and increased responsibility of the administration with the purpose of increasing the efficiency of the administration in forming policies and regulatory solutions in order to enhance the competitiveness of Croatian economy. EXPERTISE in creating the system and standards for adopting regulations, it is extremely important to include the expertise of economists, and institutions involved in research, development, and quality systems, in order to review the proposals and the practical implementation of the proposed regulations before they are adopted. RIA system is also crucial for Croatia to successfully complete the process of harmonizing its legislation with the acquis. RIA helps in reviewing the available options in harmonizing its legislation with acquis by identifying those options that will benefit Croatia the most, i.e. finding such compromises which will mitigate negative effects and use the positive ones as much as possible. Practical implementation of RIA is necessary in order to create a firm 5

basis for the arguments that Croatia is presenting through its negotiating teams to the European Commission during the negotiations on membership in the EU, and is therefore necessary to achieve the best possible conditions for Croatia's accession to EU. It is therefore necessary to adopt recognized procedures and techniques that can be implemented in practice in order for the European Commission to accept the assessments of the impact of implementing parts of the acquis in Croatian economy, society and environment as objective and valid. By introducing standardized methodology and techniques of RIA into regulatory procedures, formulation and adaptation of policies will be improved, and the administrative process would be simpler and more efficient, which would ensure a more efficient development and would simplify Croatia s entrance into the highly competitive market of the European Union. The policy formation and public consultation processes in the proposal development phase, which are already well established in the market economies of EU member states, are currently underdeveloped or inadequately implemented in Croatia. Croatia must, therefore, develop an efficient administration which will be ready to face the challenges of building Croatia as an internationally competitive market economy. Inclusion of RIA standards, forms and techniques into administration bodies will greatly contribute to the efforts and initiatives of Croatian Government to raise the level of expertise among government officials and to build the institutional capacity of the administration as a whole. Current Situation with RIA in Croatia Current practices in implementing the Rules of Procedure of GOC have indicated the following: Only budgetary impact is actively assessed (Financial Impact Assessment) as a part of regulative procedures, while economic, i.e. market, social, and environmental impacts are not assessed, that is, economic, i.e. market, social, and environmental impacts of specific options are not systematically analyzed before draft proposals are made; There are no comprehensive standards in place to implement systematic impact assessments of various regulatory solutions according to internationally recognized standards, and there is no coordination between them; PROPOSALS OF LAW, DECREE AND OTHER REGULATIONS FINANCIAL IMPACT (MOF) FULL IMPACT ON MARKET COMPETETION AND STATE AID (MOE) FULL ECOLOGICAL IMPACT (MZOPUG) FULL SOCIAL IMPACT (MZSS) FURTHER PROCEDURE TOWARDS THE GOVERNMENT I.E. CROATIAN PARLIAMENT 6

There are currently no Croatian standards or methodologies in place for the implementation of the obligations prescribed by the Rules of Procedure of GOC which would set and describe the minimum required scope. They are developed according to the proposer s own ad hoc approach and interpretation. If some proposers of regulatory solutions do use their own assessment techniques and skills in developing legislation proposals, these materials are not developed according to set standards and are not available to other stakeholders in the decision making process. Standardization and Development of RIA System Introduction of RIA does not represent introduction of a new instrument into regulatory procedures but standardization and further enhancement of an existing obligation an instrument prescribed by the Rules of Procedure of GOC and Rules of Procedure of Croatian Parliament. The success of the project directly depends on the development of human resources in the administration, and on the adaptation of current procedures to new circumstances and requirements, which will be considered in the following phases of project implementation. The first phase of this proposal intends to present the administration with feasible requirements, and therefore proposes the standardization and development of regulatory impact assessment. There are two main reasons for such approach. First, standardization and development of regulatory impact assessment presume the development of human resources and institutional capacity of administration. This poses a threat that too difficult requirements in the first phase could result in the finalization or even rejection of the entire concept, instead of adopting it as an extremely useful instrument. Second, regulatory impact assessment should not make the process of harmonization with the acquis more difficult or slower, and thus influence the progress of Croatia towards EU integration. Quite the contrary, the goal of RIA is to improve the process, but only if proposed and implemented in a way which is acceptable and feasible, and consistent with the existing absorption capacities of the regulators. Office for the Coordination of the RIA System Institutionalization of the RIA system will be the first step towards a comprehensive RIA system in Croatia. This assumes the establishment of a coordination body for the comprehensive RIA system, in the form of a Government Office for the Coordination of the RIA System (RIA Office). The primary task of the Office would be to control the quality, maintain the standards and further develop the RIA system. Other tasks of the RIA Office would include coordination of economic, social, and environmental impact assessments of proposed laws and of other regulations proposed or adopted by GOC. RIA Office should be authorized to supply opinions on the minimum contents and scope of the preliminary regulatory impact assessment, to give instructions and opinions regarding the preparation of RIA, to collect, record, process and analyze RIA data, to propose Rules on Regulatory Impact Assessment to GOC, prepare and participate in the implementation of training curricula for regulatory impact assessment, propose measures for further development and improvement of RIA system, coordinate and analyze the implementation of HITROREZ 7

measures and perform other functions within the scope of their expertise. Financial Impact Assessment will be renamed into Fiscal Impact Assessment and will remain under the authority of the Ministry of Finance. New Financial Impact Assessment will become an integral part of the Economic Impact Assessment that is under responsibility of Ministry of Economy, Labor and Entrepreneurship however, the Financial Impact Assessment part of it will continue to be under authority of Ministry of Finance. Fiscal Impact Assessment will not at this time be included into the scope of work of the RIA Office, but remains under authority of Ministry of Finance. RIA Office will be operational from July 2007, and will develop the methodology and rules for regulatory impact assessment, as well as models of cooperation between the above mentioned ministries by September 2007. The mandatory RIA system will be formally required since September 2007, but given the Parliamentary elections in November 25, 2007, the RIA will be required once the new Parliament in place early 2008. Methodology Summary In the phase of formulating a specific policy or regulation, the regulation proposer, before starting to develop a draft proposal of a regulation, must perform a preliminary RIA which will be a short report (few pages) which answers the basic questions regarding the policy or regulation that the proposer is intending to implement. This includes the following: 1. Determine the problem that the act is intended to solve; 2. The objective that is to be achieved; 3. Available options for achieving that objective; 4. Positive and negative impacts of the proposed solution (market/economic, social, and environmental); 5. Method for selecting the preferred option; 6. Selection of the method for monitoring impacts, i.e. implementation of the regulation / policy. 8

Depending on the answers to the basic questions, the proposer of the regulation submits the preliminary RIA report to the RIA Office for review (the RIA Office, if necessary, consults with experts or relevant institutions, Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction) and/or other relevant institutions. RIA Office then sends the opinion on the minimal contents and scope of the preliminary RIA to the proposer, noting any and all shortcomings and required further analyses. RIA Office also has the option of ordering the regulation proposer to perform an expanded RIA, which could include the none, one or more additional Impact Assessments: PROPOSALS OF LAW, DECREES, OTHER REGULATIONS, AND PLANNING ACTS (PROJECTS, PLANS, PROGRAMS, STRATEGIES I POLICIES) FISCAL IMPACT (MOF) INITIAL (SCREENING) RIA REPORT (REVIEW BY RIA OFFICE) NOT NEEDED IF NEEDED FULL ECONOMICAL IMPACT (MELE) INCLUDING FINANCIAL IMPACT (MOF, IF REQUIRED) FULL ECOLOGICAL IMPACT (MEPUPC) FULL SOCIAL IMPACT (MHSS) FURTHER PROCEDURE TOWARDS THE GOVERNMENT 9

Economic Impact Assessment (according to the methodology, forms and standards set by the Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship), including if necessary Financial Impact Assessment (according to the methodology, forms and standards set by the Ministry of Finance) and/or Social Impact Assessment (according to the methodology, forms and standards set by the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs) and/or Environmental Impact Assessment (according to the methodology, forms and standards set by the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction) This model ensures both efficiency and speed, and also leaves room for the possibility that the proposer commits to perform an extended assessment, either for the Croatian Government, or to defend the selected option in the Croatian Parliament. Understandably, in an informal procedure, the proposers can, according to their own judgment, while conducting the preliminary assessment consult the RIA Office and other stakeholders as well as relevant ministries - Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction and include their opinions in the impact assessment or, based on the consultations, independently perform the expanded assessment. If the relevant Government Coordinating Committee or of their Expert Working Groups responsible, in further regulatory procedures, does not consider the preliminary RIA to be adequate for the proposed regulation, the Committee may order the regulation proposer to perform an expanded RIA. This option is available until the regulation is submitted to the Government for adoption. In addition, the Government Coordinating Committee would ensure that every regulation proposal that goes to the Government includes the required preliminary RIA report and all additional RIA reports (i.e. SIA, and/or EcoIA, and/or EnvIA) requested by the RIA Office in the early stage of regulation proposal development. The RIA Office will give instructions and opinions to administration bodies conducting RIA, and monitor the RIA system, with all the related authority. Rules of procedures The central state administrative bodies and the Government s expert bodies are obliged to enclose the Initial RIA Report and the Fiscal Impact Assessment Report along with the proposed decrees, other regulation and planning acts (projects, plans, programs, strategies, policies, etc.) that are to be adopted by the Government; and along with proposed laws and planning acts initiated by the Government and forwarded to the Croatian Parliament for the adoption. The central state administrative bodies and the Government s expert bodies are obliged to submit the RIA Report to the RIA Office to obtain its opinion prior to the submission of the draft proposal as stipulated above. These bodies are also obliged to submit the Fiscal Impact Assessment Report to the Ministry of Finance to obtain its opinion prior to the submission of the proposal to the Government as explained earlier. Along with the proposals and if requested in the opinion as of RIA Office, the central state administrative bodies and the Government s expert bodies draft and submit to the Government the following reports: the Economic Impact Assessment Report including, if required, the Financial (not Fiscal) Impact Assessment Report; the Social Impact Assessment Report and the Environmental Impact 10

Assessment Report. Prior to their submission to the Government and if drafting is required pursuant to the opinion as stipulated above, the following Impact Assessment Reports are mandatory for submission to the relevant central state administrative bodies as follows: the EIA Report to the Ministry of Economy, Labor and Entrepreneurship including, if required, the Financial (Fiscal) Impact Assessment Report which is submitted to the Ministry of Finance; the Social Impact Assessment Report submitted to the Ministry of Health and Social Care; and the Environmental Impact Assessment Report submitted to the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction. The standardized methodology required for submission of the reports is prescribed by the special decision issued by the Government. The central state administrative bodies that draft proposed regulation and planning acts, are obliged to submit to the Government the reports which they deem acceptable and which are harmonized with the opinions issued by the RIA Office and relevant central state administrative bodies. In case of divergence of opinions on any segment of the Report between a central state administrative body which drafts a proposal and the Office, and a relevant central state administrative body, the central state administrative body which drafts the proposal encloses a statement specifying divergence issues and their causes along with the Report. The Government, i.e. its permanent working bodies, do not scrutinize proposed regulation or operational documents if all required reports are not enclosed. Its permanent working body may scrutinize single proposals lacking enclosed, i.e. required reports if so recommended by the Prime Minister and in cases when the Government deems that the degree of urgency and importance is such that it should not be postponed. The reasons for urgency shall be explained in writing by a proposer. Prerequisites for the Implementation of the RIA System The platform for a sustainable and continuous regulatory reform in Croatia has been created during the Croatian regulatory guillotine project HITROREZ which reviewed all business regulations and recommended the simplification or cancelation of about 55% of all regulations related to doing business in Croatia. In addition, the legal and institutional setup for RIA system in Croatia enabled integration of mandatory impact assessment for all new higher level regulations. 11

However, to make the RIA system appropriately work in the government practices, some of the prerequisites have to be in place. Most important elements of those are following: Each administration body shall identify an assistant minister level officer who will be in charge of implementing RIA in their respective administration bodies. Each administration body shall identify at least 2 operations level employees (e.g. economist lawyer) who will participate in further development of the RIA system and in training programs in order to be able to conduct training within their respective administration bodies. Advantage should be given to those employees who have already had some experience in impact assessment. In the long run, all administration bodies should make efforts to establish a department within their organization which would be in charge of conducting RIA. By establishing such departments, the necessary basis for support of the RIA process would be created. Each administration body shall conduct the preliminary RIA according to the standardized RIA methodology, prescribed by the RIA Office. Each administration body shall make an objective estimate on whether an expanded regulatory impact assessment should be performed for specific policies or regulatory solutions. The RIA Office shall be responsible for coordinating the entire process, giving instructions and opinions to assist the administration bodies, organizing training for representatives of the administration bodies, and when necessary, reporting to GOC on the implementation of the system and its efficiency. Action Plan 1. Develop a pilot RIA analysis on the Law on SME Incentives at MELE, based on standardized methodology to assess the system and develop the methodology (September - October 2006). 2. GOC adopted a Decree on Establishing the Office for the Coordination of the RIA 12

System (RIA Office) which has a task to coordinate the assessments of impact on the market i.e. economy, financial sector, society, and environment. (June 2007) 3. In parallel, the GOC adopted a Decree on Change of Rules of Procedures of the Government, which will reflect the RIA system procedure for new regulation proposals. (June2007) 4. RIA Office will develop and propose the Rules and Instructions on Regulatory Impact Assessment by September 15. (September 2007) 5. Ministry of Economy, Labor, and Entrepreneurship will develop particular Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) methodologies, forms and standards for the area of their responsibility, whereby it will closely coordinate development of Financial Impact Assessment (FIA) with Ministry of Finance. FIA will be an integral part of the EIA and will have to be undertaken for regulation that have an direct impact to the financial sector and capital markets in Croatia. (September-October 2007) 6. Prepare the training curriculum and organize training for administration employees and officials, local governments, business community, civil society, and other interest groups relevant to the RIA system (October-December 2007) 7. Organize Training Workshop I for Office for RIA staff and responsible professionals from MELE, MHSW, MEPPPC, MOF introduction to the concept of the RIA System and guidelines on about the process (January-March 2008) 8. Organize Training Workshop II for responsible professionals from other Ministries introduction to the concept of the RIA System and guidelines on about the process (February-April 2008) 9. Organize Training Workshop III for business community and citizens introduction to the concept of the RIA System and guidelines on about the process (February-April 2008) 10. Organize Training Workshop VI for sub-national governments introduction to the concept of the RIA System and guidelines on about the process (Mai-October 2008) 11. Organize workshops and seminars for further development of institutional capacity of administration bodies, in cooperation with foreign partners and donors (during 2008). 13

Process for development of new Laws (with integrated RIA) Iniciative for preparation of new legal act IF harmonisation with EU: GoC Nacional Program Organizational Unit in the Ministry that is responsible for the required admninsitrative area Initial RIA Report 1. experts of the organizational unit 2. Ministry s experts 3. experts from other GoC s bodies 4. experts from public and private sector 5. foreign experts Working Group for preparation of the working draft of the Law proposal WORKING DRAFT OF THE LAW PROPOSAL Compiled according to the Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament IF harmonization with EU than: Statement of compliance and comparative review GOC s Office for RIA Coordination Office s opinion regarding the need for mandatory Full RIA reports (economical or/and social or/and environmental (public consultations) Internal comments of the Ministry's organizational units Ministry s staff meeting (board) Minister DRAFT LAW PROPOSAL Compiled according to the Rules of Procedure of the Croatian Parliament FULL RIA Reports: economical (incl. financial) or/and social or/ and environmental according to the Office for RIA Office Coordination opinion within Initial RIA Report Fiscal Impact Assessment( MOF) Confirmation by the GOC s Office for read-proofing) Mandatory Opinion statement by MEIFA, LO, etc. according to GOC s Rules of Procedure IF proposal is related to the State-Aid: Positive mandatory Opinion by Competition Agency (AZTN) CROATIAN GOVERNMENT 1. Expert Working Groups GOC Coordination 2. GOC Coordination 3. Croatian Government LAW PROPOSAL According to the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament CROATIAN PARLIAMENT First Reading (fast-track procedure + if harmonization with EU) Meeting of the Committee, discussion and voting on the plenary session Second Reading (common procedure within 6 months from the 1 st Reading) Meeting of the Committee, discussion and voting on the plenary session Third Reading (on the exceptional basis) Meeting of the Committee, discussion and voting on the plenary session LAW Publication in the Official Gazette (put into effect, possible enforcement delays) 14

References and literature Roinn an Taoisigh, Department of the Taoiseach, How to conduct a Regulatory Impact Analysis, Ireland, October 2005 UK Better Regulations Task Force, Routes to Better Regulations: A guide to alternatives to classic regulation, December 2005 UK Cabinet Office, Better Policy Making: A Guide to Regulatory Impact Assessment Colin Kirkpatrick, David Parker* and Yin-Fang Zhang, University of Manchester, RIA in developing and transition economies: A survey of current practice and recommendations for further development, 2003 UK Cabinet Office, Regulatory Impact Unit, Regulatory Reform: The Government's Action Plan OECD, Regulatory governance in South East European countries: Progress and Challenges, July 2004 The Irish Government, Regulating Better: A Government White Paper setting out six principles of Better Regulation, January 2004 American University in Bulgaria, Implementation of Regulatory Impact Assessment, Best Practices in Europe, Sofia 2004 Deutsche Bank Research, Better regulations in Germany and the EU, August 2007 Sir David Arculus, Better Regulation Task Force, Annual Report for 2004/5 Group of consultants formed by Formez, A comparative analysis of regulatory impact assessment in 10 EU countries, Prepared for the EU directors of Better Regulation Group, Dublin, May 2004 Cordova Novion, Cesar (forthcoming 2006) Regulatory Impact Analysis in México, to be published by the Center on Regulatory and Competition, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. Jacobs, Scott (2005) Regulatory reform and administrative simplification in Moldova: A medium-term framework for action, 2005-2010, Prepared for the Ministry of Economy, Republic of Moldova (available on request) OECD (1997) OECD Report on Regulatory Reform, OECD, Paris. OECD (2000) Regulatory Reform in Hungary, OECD, Paris. OECD (2002) Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From interventionism to regulatory governance, OECD, Paris. 15