Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses



Similar documents
Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Applying HUD s Floodplain Management and Wetlands Protection Standards U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Environment and

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

Wetland Vocabulary Organizer

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Wetlands and Climate Change: Considerations for Wetland Program Managers

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

Goal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Post-Flood Assessment

MITIGATION STRATEGY OVERVIEW

New York Sea Grant Strategic Plan

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Saving Constituents Money on Flood Insurance Under FEMA s Community Rating System (CRS)

A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Regulatory Features of All Coastal and Inland Ecological Restoration Limited Projects

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

Future of our coasts: Potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance ecosystem and community resilience Ariana Sutton-Grier

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Greater Los Angeles County Region

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

Flooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Napa River Restoration Projects

Carlton Fields Memorandum

NYSDEC Optional Additional Language Model Local Law for Flood Damage Prevention Optional Additional Language

CWSRF Project Descriptions and Examples for Green Project Reserve

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

Building Resilient Infrastructure for the 21 st Century

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration

Shoreline Master Programs Handbook Chapter 15, Shoreline Stabilization

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

APPENDIX A: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Chapter 6: Mitigation Strategies

Restoring and protecting natural floodplains reduces flood losses and benefits the environment. Photo: USDA NRCS.

Existing Land Use Map

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

Markets for Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Lands: Experience and Outlook in the United States

NEW BRUNSWICK DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY AND SERVICES EEL RIVER DAM REMOVAL/ DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration


5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for:

Improving the physical condition of Scotland s water environment. A supplementary plan for the river basin management plans

7.0 Stream Restoration

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

$200 Billion. Ecosystem Services: The Gridlock Breaker. Four Types of Capital. Built Capital Social Capital Human Capital Natural Capital

Transcription:

Protecting Floodplain Natural and Beneficial i Functions While Reducing Flood Losses Jon Kusler Association of State Wetland Managers 518 872 1804; jon.kusler@aswm.org Report available at: http://aswm.org/pdf_lib/nbf.pdf

Welcome Why be concerned about floodplain natural and beneficial functions in flood loss reduction programs? How can we better protect floodplain l natural and beneficial functions while reducing flood and erosion losses?

Fills, Culverts

Channelization

Why Be Concerned About Floodplain Natural and Beneficial Functions in Flood Loss Reduction Programs? 1. Development in flood hazards is damaged by flooding increasing public and private flood losses. 2. Development in these areas increases flood hazards on adjacent, upstream, and downstream properties and this often results in disputes between landowners and lawsuits. 3. Flood plains and the wetlands and riparian areas often provide important flood loss reduction functions. 4. Floodplains provide in their own right a broad range of other functions and values to society.

1. Floodplain Wetlands And Riparian Areas Are Subject To A Variety Of Flood And Erosion related related Hazards. Reducing Development In These Areas Reduces Hazard Losses and, Simultaneously, Protects a Variety of Functions and Values Inland Flooding Due to Runoff Inland Floodingand Basement FloodingDue to Long Term Fluctuations in Ground Water Levels Erosion Coastal/Estuarine/InlandWave Action Storm Surge (Coastal and Estuarine) Liquefaction Subsidence Earthquake Wave Propagation Floodingand Hydrostatic Pressures

1. Floodplain Wetlands And Riparian Areas Are Subject To A Variety Of Flood And Erosion related related Hazards. Reducing Development In These Areas Reduces Hazard Losses and, Simultaneously, Protects a Variety of Functions and Values Inland Flooding Due to Runoff Inland Floodingand Basement FloodingDue to Long Term Fluctuations in Ground Water Levels Erosion Coastal/Estuarine/InlandWave Action Storm Surge (Coastal and Estuarine) Liquefaction Subsidence Earthquake Wave Propagation Floodingand PressureDamage FromHydrostatic Pressures

Hydrostatic Pressures

2. Flood plains and the wetlands and riparian areas provide important flood loss reduction functions. 1. Wave attenuation and erosion control 2. Storm surge and tsunami reduction 3. Flood conveyance 4. Flood storage

Wave Attentuation and Erosion Control. A Band of Floodplain Vegetation May Cause Waves to Break by Increasing Friction and Absorbing Energy

Hurricane Camille, 1969 22 2525 Foot Storm Surge and Waves

Extensive Wetlands Reduce Surge and Tsunami Elevations. 1 Foot per 1.0 to 2.7 Miles of Wetland

December, 2004 South Asian Tsunami

Flood Conveyance (Zero Rise Floodway in Tulsa) Tl

3. Development in flood areas increases flood hazards on adjacent, upstream, and downstream properties p and this results in disputes between landowners and lawsuits.

The lawyers are, of course, waiting to help you.

4. Floodplains Provide A Variety of Other Natural and Beneficial Functions Wave reduction. Flood storage. Flood conveyance. Erosion control. Habitat for fish, shellfish, waterfowl, many types of endangered species. Sediment reduction in lakes, reservoirs, streams, estuaries, and coastal systems. Pollution prevention and treatment: prevent pollution from entering a water body. treat (remove) pollution in a water body. Natural crops and timber: cranberry, blueberry, saltmarsh hay, aquaculture species, wild rice, forestry, other natural crops. Groundwater recharge.

Scenic beauty, aesthetics. Recreational opportunities, ecotourism. Historical, i archaeological, l heritage, and cultural l opportunities. Education and research. Trapping of carbon, carbon stores important to moderation of global warming. Micro climate modification.

Protect Floodplain Natural and Beneficial Functions While Reducing Flood Losses: Will The Twain Ever Meet? Floodplain managersaretypically are engineers and water resource planners; wetland managers are biologists and botanists. The two groups have different vocabularies, interests, and drinking habits. Management practices sometimes conflict. For example, fill is often used in floodplains to reduce flood losses by elevating houses, roads, other activities. But fill also destroys wetlands and broader aquatic ecosystems.

Make Protection of Natural and Beneficial Functions an Explicit itgoal

Address Erosion as Well as Flooding

Put NonStructural Floodplain Management Projects on An Equal Footing With ihstructural Projects

Undertake Multiobjective Pre flood Planning With Protection of Natural and Beneficial Functions As One Component

Undertake Post Disaster Response Reflecting Natural And dbeneficial i lfunctions

Lower National Flood Insurance Rates for Communities Which Protect Natural and Beneficial Functions Pursuant to the Community Rating System

Acquire Wetlands and Floodplains As Flood Storage And Conveyance Areas: Example: Charles River Wtl Wetland dacquisition iti

Clear Structures in Floodways, Floodplains to Reduce Flood Losses, Protect tnt Natural and Beneficial i lfunctions

Integrate Wetlands, Riparian Areas Into Flood Control lprojects

Create Multiobjective Greenways For Floodplain, Wetland, Riparian Areas

Construct Setback Levees

Create Habitat Restoration Beads Along Rivers

Provide More Accurate Floodplain Maps Reflecting the Full Range of Hazards (e.g., Erosion) andhazardfactors (e.g., Watershed Development, Erosion, Waves, Climate Change.)

Restore Floodplains, Wetlands and Riparian Areas to Reduce Flood/Erosion Losses, Restore Natural and Beneficial Functions

Adopt Local Setbacks, Buffers, Conservancy Zoning As Part of Comprehensive Planning, Smart Growth, Green Infrastructure Initiatives

Strengthen Floodplain Regulations Strengthen the ecologicalelementelement offloodplain floodplain regulatory permitting Tightly regulate fills Adopt a no adverse impact standard for floodplain regulations Adopt zero rise floodways; y; reflect storage in flood calculations Protect wetlands and riparian areas

SUMMARY: NEEDED FOR MULTIOBJECTIVE, MORE INTEGRATED APPROACHES Require: Creative out of the box thinking Willingness to go beyond FEMA minimum standards Multiobjective planning and management Building upon and utilizing floodplain, wetland and riparian natural and beneficial functions in projects Multi agency and multi group involvement Communication and cooperation

Thanks! Assessing the Natural and Beneficial Functions of Floodplains Report available at: http://aswm.org/pdf_lib/nbf.pdf pdf