U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT



Similar documents
quality staff, NIST's management, starting in the mid 1980's, worked with Congress to establish an alternative personnel management system.

APPENDIX B-2 FOCUS GROUP PROTOCOLS

Economic Development Administration Technology Administration

Position Classification Flysheet for Grants Management Series, 1109

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC Subj: Civilian Workforce Management: Managing to Payroll

NASA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 300 E STREET, SW WASHINGTON, DC VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

Performance Management System

INTERIM EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING POLICY

COMMERCE ACQUISITION MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ACQUISITION CAREER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

DMA POLICY: NAME: PAY PLAN POLICY

B. Probationary Evaluations

NASA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 300 E STREET, SW WASHINGTON, DC VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

PUBLIC RELEASE. United States Patent and Trademark Office

3 FAM 2760 CAREER SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) SABBATICAL PROGRAM

Subj: MANAGEMENT OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) AND OTHER SENIOR EXECUTIVE POSITIONS IN THE MARINE CORPS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Institute of Health

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.

NASA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL 300 E STREET, SW WASHINGTON, DC VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

CHAPTER 3. FILLING A POSITION THROUGH MERIT STAFFING PROCEDURES

US Geological Survey. Office of Human Resources Customer Service Plan

Human Resources Manual Instruction 330-2: Career Transition Assistance Plan Issue Date: 01/29/2009

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Overview of the Executive Core Qualifications: Preparing for the Senior Executive Service (SES)

Senior Executive Service (SES) Question Answer OPM URL 1 What is the basis for the Senior Executive Service?

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

RECRUITMENT PLAN

National Transportation Safety Board Strategic Human Capital Plan FY

Short Narrative About Promising Practices

September 24, Subject: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Performance Management Processes

NOAA Manager s Hiring Guide

EXECUTIVE ORDER STRENGTHENING THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE. By the authority vested in me as President by the

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

REE Position Management and Workforce/Succession Planning Checklist

Information Technology Specialists, #39110 Occupational Family: Engineering and Technology Pay Band Range: 4-8. Concept of Work

Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan

General Classification Authority. 1

Office of Merit Systems Oversight and Effectiveness

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS *WING HRR No Joint Force Headquarters - Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin July 2006

PROCEDURES OFFICE OF NEW DRUGS. External Recruitment (Civil Service) Table of Contents

How To Write An Appraisal Program

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE. STRATEGIC PLAN for AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM

INTEGRATE CHANGE INTO YOUR WORKFORCE STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS

Bonneville Power Administration Performance Management Program Policy

Department of Human Resources DCHR (BE)

TEMPORARY JOB OPENING ANNOUNCEMENT

SUBCHAPTER 430 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Purpose B. Policy C. Performance Appraisal D.

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

HUD Hired Employees in Accordance With Office of Personnel Management Guidelines for Streamlining the Federal Hiring Process HIGHLIGHTS

LuitBiz HRM modules include: Employee Management:

RECRUITMENT. Identifies the challenges involved in attracting a highquality

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Career Banding Compensation Administration Plan

Recruitment and Posting of Vacancies

Department of Homeland Security Management Directive System MD Number: 3180 SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Classification Appeal Decision Under section 5112 of title 5, United States Code

DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CHAPTER III EMPLOYMENT. P a g e 10 32

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT POLICY EMPLOYMENT PROCEDURE

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

CAREER-BANDING. HANDBOOK for MANAGERS and HUMAN RESOURCES PROFESSIONALS

IPS 5-10 Automated System for Human Resource Management

Air Force Civilian Intern Programs

University of Cincinnati. Business/Fiscal Pay Program Policies and Procedures Manual

BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AFRL MANUAL AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY (AFRL) 1 SEPTEMBER 2011 COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

USGS Pathways Managers Sessions Questions and Answers March 10 and 11, 2015

Certificate Program Course Summary and Assessment Sample

$60, to $94, / Per Year. Friday, February 14, 2014 to Tuesday, February 25, 2014

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROMOTIONAL AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES. Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation

Policy Memorandum No. 5 - FY Elected Officials, Agency Directors, and Personnel Officers State Government Agencies

DON Pathways Programs Implementing Guide

3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES

DoDEA Personnel Center HR Competency Definitions

Position Classification Flysheet for Inventory Management Series, GS Table of Contents

James Madison University Salary Administration Plan

Workforce Management Office (WFMO) Functional Statements

Contact Center Operations Manager

Defense Logistics Agency INSTRUCTION

Department of Homeland Security Management Directives System MD Number: 3181 Issue Date: 3/23/2006 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE FOR THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT SERIES, GS-2210

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS 2461 EISENHOWER AVENUE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE IMPLEMENTING GUIDANCE FOR THE PATHWAYS PROGRAMS

NATIONAL OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION HUMAN CAPITAL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM PLAN

TRANSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE

General Schedule Leader Grade Evaluation Guide

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE. STRATEGIC PLAN for AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKAN NATIVE EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM

NOAA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

PART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

WLUSA Performance Review Process. Human Resources 2015

Commission on Care Leadership Workgroup

Elizabeth City State University Career Banding Salary Administration Plan

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE. Diversity Management Plan

Human Resource Basics

Policies and Procedures Manual

How To Manage Performance

Transcription:

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT EMPLOYEE GUIDE Last Updated: August 2006 Office of Human Resources Management Department of Commerce Washington DC

INTRODUCTION This guide is designed to provide information about the Department of Commerce (DOC) Personnel Management Demonstration Project to managers, employees, and other interested individuals. Additional information can be obtained on the Department of Commerce Office of Human Resources Management Web Page: http://ohrm.os.doc.gov/demo/index.htm The DOC Demonstration Project was initially authorized by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for a five-year period. A Federal Register notice of the demonstration project plan as approved by OPM was published on December 24, 1987. The project was implemented on March 29, 1998, with an expiration date of March 28, 2003. In March of 2003, OPM approved DOC s request to extend the project until March, 2008 for research purposes, and expand it into new organizations within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary for Administration. The DOC Demonstration Project tests an alternative personnel management system within selected organizations at Commerce. The purpose is to implement a personnel management system that enhances mission accomplishment and organizational excellence by: 1) recruiting, developing, rewarding and retaining high-performing employees; 2) increasing manager s authority, responsibility and accountability over personnel decisions; and 3) improving the effectiveness and efficiency of human resources management systems. The major innovations of the project are: 1) a simplified position classification system utilizing career paths and pay bands; 2) a pay for performance appraisal system; 3) increased pay flexibility in hiring and promoting employees; and 4) flexible hiring programs. PROJECT INNOVATIONS The project features major innovations in the areas of position classification, performance management, pay administration and staffing as outlined below. 2

POSITION CLASSIFICATION The DOC Demonstration Project includes a simplified and improved position classification process through pay banding, generic classification standards, an automated classification system and the delegation of position classification authority to managers. Positions are classified according to career paths and pay bands within the career paths. Career paths are categories of occupations grouped by similarities in duties, qualification requirements, pay ranges and career progression. The four separate career paths are Scientific and Engineering (ZP), Scientific and Engineering Technician (ZT), Administrative (ZA), and Support (ZS). A single pay band within a career path normally covers a pay range of two or more grades within the General Schedule (GS). Positions are classified by title, career path, occupational series, and pay band (e.g. Secretary, ZS-318-1). Bands replace grades and steps. Series are retained. The pay range for each pay band is equivalent to the pay range of GS grades within the pay band, including locality pay rates and any special pay rates. Supervisors have an additional range of pay which is six percent above the non-supervisory pay ceiling of a pay band (referred to as supervisory pay) that they can earn through performance pay increases. PAY BAND FRAMEWORK CAREER PATHS Scientific and Engineering (Pay Plan: ZP) Scientific and Engineering Technician (Pay Plan: ZT) Administrative (Pay Plan: ZA) Support (Pay Plan: ZS) Corresponding GS Grade PAY BANDS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 3

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The performance cycle under the project s Performance Management System begins on October 1 st and ends on September 30 th. Employees covered under the project are eligible to receive annual pay increases and bonuses. Pay increases and bonuses are effective at the beginning of the first full pay period in November. The Pay for Performance System combines a two-level rating system with a 100-point scoring system to determine annual pay increases and bonuses. Employees who receive scores of 40 or above are eligible to receive bonus and/or pay adjustments, based on their performance. They also receive locality pay and the annual general increases each January. Those with scores below 40 are ineligible to receive these pay and bonus increases. The appraisal process has three stages: performance planning, progress review and appraisal. During the planning stage in October, the supervisor prepares a written performance plan with input from the employee. The progress review stage involves at least one formal meeting in March or April between the supervisor and employee to discuss progress in meeting the requirements contained within the performance plan. Supervisors are encouraged to provide feedback to their subordinates throughout the year. Employees are also encouraged to ask their supervisors for feedback and/or to clarify expectations. The final stage involves the formal appraisal of the employee. Employees must provide a written list of accomplishments to the supervisor for discussion at the Performance Review Meeting. This meeting normally takes place in September. The supervisor makes a recommendation of rating, score, pay increase and bonus to a pay pool manager who makes final appraisal decisions. Once appraisal decisions are made, an Evaluation Feedback Meeting is held between the supervisor and the employee to review and discuss the final appraisal decisions and to provide the employee the formal appraisal. This normally occurs in October or November. PAY FLEXIBILITY Pay for Performance is designed to attract high performers and reward employees for a job well done. Managers have the flexibility to set pay within the pay band upon hiring, promoting, or internally selecting employees competitively. Promotions within the demonstration project are given as a result of movement to a higher pay band within a career path or as a result of competitive movement to a pay band in another career path in combination with a pay increase. The minimum pay increase for promotion is six percent or the amount required to reach the minimum of the new pay band. There is no maximum percentage except that the new salary may not exceed the pay ceiling of the new pay band. Promotions are subject to the approval of management and are never automatic. 4

STAFFING Many of the staffing innovations first tested under the DOC Demonstration Project and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Alternative Personnel System are now a key part of the General Schedule. Agency-Based programs authorize Human Resources Offices to create their own candidate registers, instead of using OPM s registers. The Direct Hire Program authorizes managers to select candidates for hard-to-fill positions utilizing general, rather than individual specific vacancy announcements. New employees hired into research and development positions within the Scientific and Engineering Career Path (ZP) are subject to a three-year probationary period instead of the customary one-year probationary period. This provides managers and employees with a more flexible period for appraising long-term research and development projects. The Reduction-in-Force system was modified to accommodate a pay banding system. Employees compete within their career paths. The competitive area is comprised of positions within the employee s organization for which they qualify within the local commuting area. Employees who receive a score which is in the top 30 percent of scores within their pay pool receive10 additional years of service credit. An employee may accumulate this credit up to a maximum of 30 years based upon their last three performance appraisals. A modification to the RIF system was approved by OPM at the request of DOC. This change provides five years of augmented service credit to those with an Eligible score (40 or above), new employees hired from other Federal agencies and those converting into the demonstration project as a result of expansion, for a maximum of 15 years based on the last three appraisals. FOR MORE INFORMATION Further information on the Demonstration Project may be obtained from the Department of Commerce Office of Human Resources Management Web Page http://ohrm.os.doc.gov/demo/index.htm. If you have any questions regarding any aspect of this project, please contact your Demonstration Project Contact within your servicing Human Resources Management Office. 5

6