Scale-Up of High-Temperature Syngas Cleanup Technology



Similar documents
An Update on RTI s Warm Syngas Cleanup Demonstration Project

Hybrid Power Generations Systems, LLC

How To Run A Power Plant

How To Make A Carbon Capture Plant Workable

Siemens Gasification Project Update and Lessons Learned

From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology at a Glance

Hydrogen from Natural Gas via Steam Methane Reforming (SMR)

COAL GASIFICATION AND CO 2 CAPTURE

Viresco Energy s Advanced Gasification Technology

MHI Air-Blown IGCC Technology & Application to Chinese Project

Outlook on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technology

Reliability of IGCC Power Plants

Morphysorb /Genosorb Physical solvents for acid gas removal

Dow Solvent Technologies for CO 2 Removal

SKI Coal Gasification Technology. Feb. 23, 2012

A COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL SOLVENTS FOR ACID GAS REMOVAL. Barry Burr and Lili Lyddon Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc. Bryan, Texas, U.S.A.

Simulation of a base case for future IGCC concepts with CO 2 capture

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

The Shell-Paques/THIOPAQ Gas Desulphurisation Process: Successful Start Up First Commercial Unit.

How To Make A High Co 2 Gas Blend

NGL RECOVERY PLANT: TREATER OPTIMIZATION FOR WATER AND MERCAPTAN REMOVAL

Gasification of Solid Waste: Is this the recipe for trash to treasure?

Capital Cost Scaling Methodology Quality Guidelines for Energy System Studies January 2013 Disclaimer

Morris Argyle Assistant Professor Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. School of Energy Resources Symposium Casper, WY February 28, 2007

Praxair, Inc. Ray Roberge Sr. VP and Chief Technology Officer

THE NEW GASIFICATION PROJECT AT ENI SANNAZZARO REFINERY AND ITS INTEGRATION WITH A 1050 MWe POWER PLANT

Syngas Purification Units

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology Stoffliche Nutzung der Braunkohle

How To Make A Mine Guard Fosil Process

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

SIEMENS technologies compatible with environmental requirements like reduction of CO 2 emissions. ISBF conference. Bratislava, 9-10 February 2009

MERCURY REMOVAL FROM NATURAL GAS AND LIQUID STREAMS ABSTRACT. Giacomo Corvini, Julie Stiltner and Keith Clark UOP LLC Houston, Texas, USA

Making Coal Use Compatible with Measures to Counter Global Warming

(205) (205)

B0401 Abstract 029 Oral Presentation Session B04 Innovative Applications and Designs - Tuesday, July 1, :00 h

Tampa Electric Company Polk Power Station IGCC Project Project Status

Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

Olefins from Syngas Potential for bio-based applications Dr. Thomas Wurzel, Lurgi GmbH. New Biofuels rd-24th June 2010, Berlin, Germany

Optimizing DRI production using natural gas

IGCC Technology Overview & Genoa Site Feasibility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Effect of EPA s Proposed NSPS on. Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

SECARB 10 th Annual Stakeholders' Briefing. Southern Company CCS R&D: Plant Barry CCS Demo. Dr. Richard A. Esposito Southern Company.

Natural Gas as a Chemical Industry Fuel and Feedstock: Past, Present, Future (and Far Future)

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

MHI s Energy Efficient Flue Gas CO 2 Capture Technology and Large Scale CCS Demonstration Test at Coal-fired Power Plants in USA

Thermo Conversions Gasification (TCG) Technology

Putting a chill on global warming

Objectives. Use IGCC dynamic simulator and operator training system (OTS) to: o o

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

Evolving Gasification technology to provide Innovative Low Carbon Solutions for the European Market

WATER WALL BOILER FOR AIR AND OXYGEN FIRED CLAUS SULPHUR RECOVERY UNITS

Options for tar reforming in biomass gasification. Klas J. Andersson, Poul Erik Højlund Nielsen - IFC 2012

CHAPTER 7 THE DEHYDRATION AND SWEETENING OF NATURAL GAS

Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

Eric D. Larson Energy Systems Analysis Group, Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, USA

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

MERCURY REMOVAL FROM NATURAL GAS & LIQUID STREAMS. John Markovs UOP Des Plaines, Illinois. Jack Corvini UOP Houston, Texas

AMMONIA AND UREA PRODUCTION

The Cost of CCS for Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants

Gas Treating Products and Services. Gas Treating Technologies and Services. Alkyl Alkanolamines, Ethanolamines, and Isopropanolamines

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Gasification of Biomass for Syngas generation at ETC

Process Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion with Oxygen Uncoupling in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

Advanced Mercury Removal Technologies UOP LLC. All rights reserved. UOP 5241G-01

IBP 2778_10 HIGH EFFICIENCY ON CO2 REMOVAL IN NATURAL GAS WITH UCARSOL SOLVENTS Thiago V. Alonso 1. Abstract. 1. Introduction

VALIDATION, MODELING, AND SCALE-UP OF CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION WITH OXYGEN UNCOUPLING

How To Develop A Coal To Chemicals

Sixth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration

Executive Summary. Catalyst Testing Results

John Bøgild Hansen, Haldor Topsøe. Energinet.dk s VE gas dag 2011 En industriaktørs synspunkter

Case study: Velocys partnership with Waste Management, Ventech Engineers LLC and NRG Energy

David Mezzacappa, P.E. SCS Engineers Contractor to U.S. EPA on LMOP

Coal Gasification & Fischer-Tropsch

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS NATURAL GAS PROCESSING. H. K. Abdel-Aal National Research Center (NRC), Cairo, Egypt

Overview of Topsøe Synthesis Technologies for BTL and bio-sng

Lecture 9 Solving Material Balances Problems Involving Non-Reactive Processes

UOP Gas Processing. Realizing the Value of Your Natural Gas and Synthesis Gas Resources

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

Yu. F. Vasyuchkov*, M. Yu. Bykova* NEW TECHNOLOGY OF GAS EXTRACTION ON THE BASE OF A COAL TO A HYDROGEN TRANSFER

310 Exam Questions. 1) Discuss the energy efficiency, and why increasing efficiency does not lower the amount of total energy consumed.

Transcription:

Scale-Up of High-Temperature Syngas Cleanup Technology August 10, 2015 Raghubir Gupta Vice President, Energy Technology Division, RTI International Recovery Act: DOE Cooperative Agreement DE- FE0000489 RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. www.rti.org

Syngas Cleanup is a Critical Step in the Gasification Process RTI Warm Gas Cleanup Technology An advanced enabling technology for other downstream technologies, such as novel hydrogen enrichment, syngas conversion, WGS, warm CO 2 capture. Graphic: Gasification Technologies Council 2

RTI Warm Syngas Cleanup Technology Platform RTI PILOT PLANT TEST UNITS AT EASTMAN COAL GASIFICATION PLANT Regenerable ZnO sorbents Sulfur Transport reactor Direct Sulfur Recovery Process Regenerable NH 3 /HCN adsorbents Hg adsorbents (disposable) As adsorbents (disposable) Se adsorbents (disposable) HCl adsorbents (disposable) Regenerable CO 2 sorbents PRE-COMMERCIAL DEMO PROJECT w/cc UNDERWAY AT TAMPA ELECTRIC SITE RTI has developed a platform of warm syngas cleanup technologies: Increase efficiency and lower costs Operate at 250-600ºC Pressure independent Effective for all forms of sulfur Fully compatible with all CO 2 capture Flexible modular approach enables specific syngas purity needs to be met Systems tested on actual coal-based syngas Warm desulfurization process (WDP) now tested through pre-commercial demo scale 3

RTI Warm Syngas Desulfurization Process (WDP) A unique process technology based on transport reactor design (related to commercial FCC reactor designs) and on the development of a highly active, attrition-resistant sorbent. RTI Proprietary Desulfurization Sorbent R&D 100 Award Unique highly-dispersed nanostructures Developed in long-term cooperation with Clariant (~100 tons to date) Covered by extensive US & International patents, including several recent improvements Part of comprehensive high temperature contaminant removal platform. 4

From Lab to Large Scale Demonstration Invention (2001) Proprietary RTI sorbent R&D 100 Award (2004) Lab/bench testing (2001-2003) RTI, NC Concept proven & modeled Pilot testing (2006-2008) Eastman Chemical Co., TN 3000 hr, coal-derived syngas Demonstration (2010-2015): Syngas cleanup / carbon capture Tampa Electric Co., Polk 1 IGCC Plant, FL 50 MW e equivalent scale, coal/petcoke-derived syngas 5

Installed Pilot Plant Systems (2006-2008) Eastman s Kingsport, TN, Coal Gasification Facility Warm Desulfurization Process (WDP) Multi-contaminant Control Test System (MCC) Direct Sulfur Recovery Process (DSRP) 6

RTI Warm Desulfurization Process (WDP) Pilot Plant Testing at Eastman Chemical Company Coal Gasification Plant (2006-2008) More than 3,000 hours of total syngas operation. Consistent high performance across a wide pressure range. Pressure 20 bar 30 bar 40 bar * Inlet Sulfur Concentration (avg.) 8,700 ppmv 7,000 ppmv 8,400 ppmv Effluent Sulfur Concentration (avg.) 5.9 ppmv 10.7 ppmv 5.7 ppmv % Total Sulfur Removal (avg.) 99.9% 99.8% 99.9% Observed attrition rate was lower than commercial FCC catalysts. * Same pilot unit was tested to 80 bar at ChevronTexaco R&D site with similar (~99.9%) S removal. 7

RTI Warm Syngas Desulfurization Demonstration Project Desulfurization System Demonstration Project Team Role CO 2 Capture RTI Tampa Electric (TEC) Shaw Group, AMEC Project management; technology developer Host site and operations support Engineering (Shaw - FEED, AMEC - EPC) WGS Reactors Project Detail: Combined syngas cleanup / water-gas-shift / carbon capture demonstration $168.8M DOE ARRA funding to design, construct, operate 50 MW e equivalent scale; captures > 90% of CO 2 CH2M Hill Owner s engineer BASF Technology (amdea ) for CO 2 capture Clariant Produces sulfur sorbent & WGS Project Objective: Demonstrate catalysts RTI s warm syngas cleanup DOE/NETL technology with Funding integrated agency; carbon project capture at pre-commercial scale consultation an operating gasification plant. Eastman Chemical Development partner; technical support 8

Integration of Syngas Cleaning and Carbon Capture Systems at Tampa Site WDP Sweet WGS Reactors Syngas Cooling amdea CO 2 Recovery Air Air Separation Oxygen Coal/Petcoke GE Gasifier (~400 psig) Slag Syngas Cooling Char Syngas Diluent (N 2 ) Demonstration Project Scope Scrubbers COS Hydrolysis Process Condensate Syngas Cooling Regenerator Gas MDEA Clean Fuel Gas Reheat/ Humidify Currently vented, but could be sequestered or used or recycled Sulfuric Acid Plant Acid Gas Sulfuric Acid Extraction Air 8% H 2 O ~ ~ 128 Mwe (122 Mwe) Raw Syngas Process Clean 20% slipstream test (~50 MW e ) enables Water direct commercial Fuel scale-up Gas from this demonstration scale. The demonstration plant cleans ~2MMscfh of raw syngas from the TECO gasifier. 9

RTI WDP Demonstration Project Objectives Demonstrate RTI WDP technology s ability to reduce capital costs, improve efficiency, and lower carbon footprint for gasification CO 2 Capture Desulfurization System Mitigate design and scale-up risks Verify capital and operating costs Integrate RTI warm syngas cleanup technology with carbon dioxide capture WGS Reactors 10

WDP Scale-Up Factors EMN Pilot Plant Demonstration Commercial Size (MWe) 0.3 50* 600** Gas Flow (KSCFH) 8 2,000 24,000 Footprint (ft 2 ) 260 1,100 3,000 Adsorber Mixing Zone Riser 15 H x 2.5 ID 40 H x 1.5 ID 16 H x 54 ID 50 H x 28 ID 16 H x 15 ID 50 H x 8 ID Regenerator Mixing Zone Riser 10 H x 1.5 ID 20 H x 1 ID 21 H x 14 ID 44 H x 8 ID 21 H x 4 ID 44 H x 2.5 ID * About half the size of commercial industrial gasification systems which are typically ~100 MWe. ** Approximately the size of current state-of-the-art IGCC reference plants (~600 MWe) Demo to Full Commercial Scale is Straight-forward Scale-up 11

Demonstration Plant Site Location Pre-Construction TEC Polk 1 IGCC Sept 30, 2012 12

RTI 50-MWe Warm Syngas Cleanup Demonstration Project - Construction Warm Syngas Desulfurization Process (WDP) Equipment Completed Construction 50-MWe Demonstration Project Ribbon-Cutting Ceremony April 9, 2014 Water-Gas-Shift (WGS) Reactors amdea Carbon Capture Unit 13

Bench-scale Testing of RTI-3 Shows Good Performance 12 10 Sulfidation (Dry) Regeneration Sulfur Loading [%wt.] 8 6 4 Initial production 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cycle Number 12 10 Sulfidation (Dry) Regeneration Sulfur Loading [%wt.] 8 6 4 Optimized production 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cycle Number 14

Demonstration Plant Results: High Total S Removal Syngas inlet H 2 S concentration: 7,500 to 10,800 ppmv Syngas inlet COS concentration: 450 to 650 ppmv WDP 15

Demonstration Plant: Gas Mass Flow Rates for Syngas 30 Inlet and outlet CO2 concentration, vol% 25 20 15 10 5 0 1/18/15 1/19/15 1/20/15 1/21/15 1/22/15 1/23/15 1/24/15 1/25/15 1/26/15 Amine Out CO2 LTGC Out CO2 16

Sulfur Concentration Downstream of the amdea Amine absorber effluent concentration, ppbv 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Sulfur Concentration Downstream of WDP+aMDEA Process Total Sulfur H2S COS 0 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 7/31/2015 17

Demonstration Plant: Temperature Profile Adsorber Regenerator 18

RTI Warm Gas Cleanup (WDP) Demonstration Project Performance Construction achieved on schedule and under budget > 500,000 total labor hours with no significant injury (other than minor first aid) Unit performing as expected with >1,200 syngas operation hours to date WDP Unit 99.7-99.9% total sulfur removal from RTI WDP step >99.99% total sulfur removal achieved WDP + amdea (sub-ppmv levels of total sulfur in cleaned syngas) 19

RTI Warm Gas Cleanup (WDP) Demonstration Project Performance Sorbent attrition rate significantly lower compared to the design value Sorbent sulfur capacity steady - no sign of deactivation Successful operation both below and above design syngas flow rate Carbon Capture Unit Demonstration testing continuing with goal to achieve at least 5,000 total syngas operation hours Now seeking suitable partner(s) to help RTI commercially deploy the technology 20

Competitive Position of RTI Warm Syngas Cleanup Technology A previous 2007 study by Nexant* indicated significant (10-15% or more) advantages of RTI s warm syngas cleanup technology for IGCC applications without carbon capture. This study was based upon data from the 3000+ hrs of pilot testing at Eastman Chemical Company. The Nexant studies were also independently verified by a separate study commissioned by DOE-NETL with Noblis. RTI Technology Benefits IGCC w/o CC Increases overall IGCC efficiency ~10% Dispatches ~10% more power Reduces IGCC capex/kw ~15% Reduces LCOE ~10% Reduces water consumption ~25% Reduces wastewater ~60% Reduces high-pressure N 2 used by ~40% Actual cost data from the demo plant indicate that these previously estimated cost benefits are conservative. A new Nexant study is now underway (including CC) based upon results from our demonstration testing at Tampa Electric Company. * http://www.netl.doe.gov/file%20library/research/coal/energy%20systems/gasification/pubs/090520-nexant-rti-rpt-_public_.pdf 21

Competitive Position of RTI Warm Syngas Cleanup Technology Ongoing RTI techno-economic 3 rd -party validated studies also show potential for significant advantages of RTI s warm syngas cleanup technology for chemicals/fuels applications RTI Technology Benefits Chemicals Substantially reduces capex for AGR/SRU Decouples S and CO 2 removal, with benefits Integrates with most CO 2 capture processes to achieve S reductions adequate for use in chemicals/fuels applications at lower costs & higher overall process efficiencies Reduces overall water footprint Increases efficiency in coal usage - same product volumes with less feedstock 22

RTI WDP Technology Can Expand Markets for Conventional Acid Gas Removal (AGR) Typical/Suitable RTI WDP + CC Applications Amines Selexol Rectisol (e.g., amdea ) IGCC (without CC) IGCC (with CC) (too expensive) (too expensive) H 2 or NH 3 /Urea Chemicals (e.g., MeOH, F-T, SNG) (not capable) (not capable) (not capable) RTI WDP + amdea works economically across the whole spectrum of applications * CC = Carbon dioxide capture 23

Techno-Economic Analyses: Gasifier Design Basis Shell solids-fed type gasifier Coal PRB or Shenhua Mix* coal (~0.6-0.7% sulfur in coal) (~2,000-3,000 ppmv total sulfur in raw syngas) Syngas flow-rate equivalent to two large gasifiers (each ~300 MW e ) (combined ~33,000 lbmoles/hr of CO + H 2 ) Raw syngas pressure ~ 600 psia, Temperature ~ 600 F * Representative of the most common type of coal in China 24

Techno-Economic Analyses: Syngas Cleanup Design Cases Base Case for Chemicals (e.g., Methanol): Sour WGS + Syngas Cooling + Rectisol AGR + Claus/SCOT SRU Base Case for IGCC Power Generation with CC: Sour WGS + Syngas Cooling + Selexol AGR + Claus/SCOT SRU (dual-stage Selexol for IGCC with CC) RTI WDP Cases: WDP + Sweet WGS + Syngas Cooling + CC* + Modified Claus/DYNAWAVE SRU * CO 2 capture (CC) options for WDP Cases: Rectisol (chilled methanol; Linde/Lurgi) Selexol (DEPG solvent; UOP) Activated amines (e.g., BASF amdea ) Acronyms: AGR = acid gas removal CC = carbon capture WGS = water gas shift SRU = sulfur recovery unit 25

TEA: Coal to Methanol Comparisons RTI WDP improves economics for all CC cases! 26 Technology used in RTI Demo Plant Non-labor, non-feedstock operating costs NOTES: Cost savings indicated are across the entire block from raw warm syngas exiting the gasifier block through cleaned syngas feed to the methanol conversion step, including the SRU. These analyses do not include additional benefits to the entire plant that might occur from overall efficiency savings. Nexant is currently performing a detailed analysis to determine these overall system benefits.

TEA: IGCC (power gen) with CO 2 Capture 27 Technology used in RTI Demo Plant Non-labor, non-feedstock operating costs NOTES: Cost savings indicated are across the entire block from raw warm syngas exiting the gasifier block through cleaned syngas feed to the syngas turbine step, including the sulfur recovery unit. These analyses do not include additional benefits to the entire IGCC plant that might occur from overall efficiency savings, such as higher net power generation per ton of coal. A new Nexant study is providing an indication of these additional overall system benefits, which are substantial.

Benefits of RTI WDP Technology Rectisol and Selexol (solvent-based sorbent systems that operate at sub-ambient temperatures) dominate the current coal to chemicals market. RTI WDP is a unique differentiated warm-temperature, solid-sorbent based syngas cleanup system that simultaneously offers: Lower capital costs (20-50% less), Lower non-labor, non-feedstock operating costs (up to 30-50+% less), Improved overall process efficiency (up to 10+% better), Improved process flexibility by decoupling sulfur removal and carbon dioxide capture, and A capable and economic syngas cleanup option for all applications. 28

Ancillary R&D to Support this Project Trace Contaminant Removal Process (TCRP) Technology: warmtemperature (250-600 C) sorbents for other trace contaminants in syngas such as Hg, As, Se, HCN, NH 3, HCl. Direct Sulfur Recovery Process (DSRP) Technology: alternative to Claus/SCOT for elemental sulfur recovery Advanced Water-Gas-Shift (WGS) Technology: improves efficiency and reduces the cost of WGS Warm-temperature CO 2 Capture Technology: enables full efficiency potential of WDP by avoiding downstream syngas cooldown for carbon capture Micro-reactor Testing: testing of syngas from RTI s WDP demonstration facility to determine its suitability for chemicals and fuels conversion 29

Key DOE-NETL Gasification Systems R&D Program Areas RTI Warm Gas Cleanup Technology An advanced enabling technology for other downstream technologies, such as novel hydrogen enrichment, syngas conversion, WGS, warm CO 2 capture. 30

Integration with Other DOE Supported Projects RTI WDP technology is a key enabler and a complement for a number of other DOE-supported technologies including: Advanced gasification technology such as the Aerojet Rocketdyne (now GTI) compact gasifier and dry solids pump: New Nexant studies (soon to be released) show that integration of this advanced gasifier technology with RTI WDP provides significant reductions in overall capital cost, operating cost, and cost of CO 2 avoided and a significant improvement in overall efficiency for both power generation and chemicals production. Warm-temperature CO 2 Capture Technology: Enables full efficiency potential by avoiding substantial syngas cooldown Advanced WGS: Enables advanced WGS for either sweet or sour WGS systems to help optimize overall process design, cost, and efficiency 31 RTI WDP is viable across a wide spectrum of sulfur concentrations and species in syngas, across a wide range of pressures (pressure-independent), and can couple with almost any downstream carbon capture technology, making it suitable and beneficiary for integration with almost any advanced gasification process design, including hybrid coal-biomass and coal-ng systems.

Summary RTI has developed and is now demonstrating at near-commercial scale an advanced warm syngas desulfurization process (WDP) at temperatures as high as 600 C. WDP technology alone can achieve up to 99.9% total sulfur (S) removal from syngas and when coupled with a carbon capture technology, such as activated amines, can achieve >99.99% total S removal (sub-ppmv levels, suitable for most chemicals/fuels). Key to the technology is a proprietary regenerable sorbent that can be used in a very rapid, small footprint transport reactor system with excellent attrition resistance. RTI WDP is a unique differentiated syngas cleanup technology system that can: Improve process flexibility by decoupling sulfur removal and carbon dioxide capture, Integrate synergistically with most CO 2 removal technologies to enable them to meet syngas purity requirements for ultra-clean power and chemicals/fuels applications, Provide reduced capital costs for syngas cleanup (20-50% lower than conventional technologies) in either a standalone or integrated approach, Provide reduced overall non-labor, non-feedstock operating costs (30-50+% less), and Provide higher overall process efficiencies (up to 10+% better). The WDP technology will be ready for commercial deployment in 2016 and RTI has launched a significant effort to identify and engage the best commercial partner(s). 32

Acknowledgements RTI Contributors: Brian Turk, Ben Gardner, David Denton, J.P. Shen, Atish Kataria, Gary Howe, John Albritton, Vijay Gupta, Himanshu Paliwal, Pradeep Sharma, Markus Lesemann, Jason Norman, Justin Farmer, Caroline Ball DOE/NETL: Jenny Tennant, David Lyons, Regis Conrad, Bhima Sastri, Sam Tam, Peter Rozelle, Gary Stiegel Development and Project Partners: Tampa Electric Company Eastman Chemical Company Technip (formerly Shaw) AMEC Foster Wheeler CH2M Hill BASF Clariant (formerly Sud Chemie) 33

QUESTIONS? Contact: Raghubir Gupta Vice President Energy Technology Division RTI International gupta@rti.org 919-541-8023 34 RTI Warm Syngas Demonstration Project