Evaluating Real-World Hearing Aid Performance in a Laboratory



Similar documents
Performance of Directional Microphones for Hearing Aids: Real-World versus Simulation

application note Directional Microphone Applications Introduction Directional Hearing Aids

Life is on. Interact freely. Communicate with confidence. Live without limit. Life is on.

A Microphone Array for Hearing Aids

5th Congress of Alps-Adria Acoustics Association NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS

Early vs. Late Onset Hearing Loss: How Children Differ from Adults. Andrea Pittman, PhD Arizona State University

Expanding Performance Leadership in Cochlear Implants. Hansjuerg Emch President, Advanced Bionics AG GVP, Sonova Medical

Effects of Noise Attenuation Devices on Screening Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Different Levels of Background Noise

Pricing Modifier. Informational Modifier

ACOUSTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE EMERGENCY ALARM SYSTEMS IN AN INDUSTRIAL SETTING

Dynamic sound source for simulating the Lombard effect in room acoustic modeling software

Workshop Perceptual Effects of Filtering and Masking Introduction to Filtering and Masking

Features. Benefits. Technical Specifications. Compatible Products. Super cardioid microphone for video production.

GSI AUDIOSTAR PRO CLINICAL TWO-CHANNEL AUDIOMETER. Setting The Clinical Standard

THEY CAN T. Did You Know #2... Did You Know #1... Did You Know #3... 2/4/2014. Financial Disclosures

Ruth Litovsky University of Wisconsin Madison, WI USA

Three pre-tests: What they do and why experts say you should use them more

Electroacoustic and Behavioural Evaluation of Hearing Aid Digital Signal Processing Features

Stanford University. Hearing Conservation Program

A Sound Localization Algorithm for Use in Unmanned Vehicles

Essential hearing technology, shaped for life

Tonal Detection in Noise: An Auditory Neuroscience Insight

Acoustical Design of Rooms for Speech

Testing FM Systems on the FP35 Hearing Aid Analyzer -1-

hearing products and acoustic regulations in school 1+1 could equal 3, if a classroom is acoustically regulated when using hearing systems

Does premium listening require premium hearing aids?

Evaluation of Classroom Audio Distribution and Personal FM Systems. Jace Wolfe

PS 29M DUAL CHANNEL BELTPACK IN METAL CASE

OAK GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Solutions. Feature Chart 4 Feature Summary 6. Feature Chart 14 Feature Summary 16

By Michael Block, PhD

Fit for duty? Hannah Semeraro,

Use of a Digital Hearing Aid with Directional Microphones in School-aged Children

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM HEARING AID/ AUDIOLOGY SERVICES PROCEDURE CODES

Magnitude of Hearing Loss and Open Ear Fittings

The Top 5 Things You Should Know Before Buying Hearing Aids

Advanced Speech-Audio Processing in Mobile Phones and Hearing Aids

SMARTPHONE AS NOISE LEVEL METER? Jacopo Fogola, Stefano Masera, Vincenzo Bevacqua Environmental Protection Agency - Piedmont Region, Turin, Italy

Evaluation of Digital Remote Microphone Wireless Systems. Jace Wolfe

PERCENTAGE ARTICULATION LOSS OF CONSONANTS IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOMS

SPEECH Biswajeet Sarangi, B.Sc.(Audiology & speech Language pathology)

Audio processing and ALC in the FT-897D

Phonak Naída Q. Product information

Samuel R. Atcherson, Ph.D.

Case studies.

ReSound Aventa 3.7 fitting software supports all ReSound instruments built on the ReSound Range, Range II and Smart Range chips.

*For stability of the feedback loop, the differential gain must vary as

Case Study THE IMPORTANCE OF ACCURATE BEHAVIOURAL TESTING IN INFANT HEARING AID FITTINGS

Stream Boost: All About That Bass

Using LACE (Listening and Communication Enhancement) Software with CAPD Patients

OTICON RIA pro OTICON RIA

Say hello to the world's smartest hearing aids

hi HealthInnovations Methods for Prescribing Hearing Device Gain: Reliability and Accuracy

What Audio Engineers Should Know About Human Sound Perception. Part 2. Binaural Effects and Spatial Hearing

Performance of a Fully Adaptive Directional Microphone to Signals Presented from Various Azimuths

Alberta Health. AADL Approved Products List Hearing Aids, Bone Anchored Hearing Devices and Cochlear Implants Pricing effective April 1, 2016

The NAL Percentage Loss of Hearing Scale

What you need to know about student s hearing technology for classroom listening

Interference to Hearing Aids by Digital Mobile Telephones Operating in the 1800 MHz Band.

Unilateral (Hearing Loss in One Ear) Hearing Loss Guidance

instruction guide Version 2.2 Table of contents

Benefit Acclimatization in Elderly Hearing Aid Users

resoundpro.com WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY Expand your clients hearing experience A GUIDE FOR PROFESSIONALS

Everybody has the right to

Predicting Speech Intelligibility With a Multiple Speech Subsystems Approach in Children With Cerebral Palsy

IAC Ch 8, p.1. Males Females

PRODUCT INFORMATION oticon ALtA PRo oticon ALtA

Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services Division of Disability and Elder Services Bureau of Aging & Long Term Care Resources

Hearing Conservation Program

with the new portables

Software Audio Processor. Users Guide

Individual Variability in Benefit from Fixed and Adaptive Directional Microphones

Generic - Hearing Loop - (AFILS) U.S. System Specification

DeNoiser Plug-In. for USER S MANUAL

Generating Element. Frequency Response. Polar Pattern. Impedance. Output Level

Using Your Fitting Software This guide provides comprehensive, task-based information about all the fitting software features.

Noise in the customer service center

Audiology as a School Based Service. Purpose. Audiology (IDEA 2004) Arkansas SPED Regulations. IDEA 2004 Part B

MICROPHONE SPECIFICATIONS EXPLAINED

Speech as input for technical measures

Audiometric (Hearing) Screening September November 2013

Step-by-Step RECD Guide

COMPENSATION FOR NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS

Noise at work a guide for health and safety representatives

AI Audio 2 (SoundMAX High Definition Audio utility)

Search keywords: Connect, Meeting, Collaboration, Voice over IP, VoIP, Acoustic Magic, audio, web conferencing, microphone, best practices

Measurement of the validity and reliability of hearing aid listening checks as performed by speech-language pathologists

Functional Communication for Soft or Inaudible Voices: A New Paradigm

The E-Scope Electronic Stethoscope Catalog of Products April 25, 2012

Radio Aid Systems. 12 School &

GUIDELINES ON THE ACOUSTICS OF SOUND FIELD AUDIOMETRY IN CLINICAL AUDIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS

UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual

Speech Signal Processing: An Overview

Room Acoustics. Boothroyd, Page 1 of 18

The world s first Acoustic Power Equalization Technology Perfect Acoustic Power Equalization. Perfect Time/Phase Alignment.

PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY Andrew P. McGrath, AuD

Counseling parents for the use of hearing aids

MicW i436 on iphone 6 / iphone 6 Plus basedreal Time

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Hearing Review - January 2012 New Technology and Research: Tech Topic

Transcription:

Evaluating Real-World Hearing Aid Performance in a Laboratory Mead C. Killion principal investigator* Lawrence J. Revit research assistant and presenter** Ruth A. Bentler research audiologist Mary Meskan research audiologist *Mead Killion is president of Etymotic Research, which funded the current study and which co-developed the R-SPACE sound-field system described in this talk. **Larry Revit is founder of Revitronix, which co-developed to the R-SPACE sound-field system described in this talk.

BACKGROUND In a joint project spanning 6 years, we developed a sound recording and playback system for accurate simulation of real-world acoustic environments, while offering the advantages of laboratory control and repeatability. This work focused on three goals: 1] The simulated environments should sound real. 2] The simulated environments should allow hearing aids and the hearing mechanism to perform as they do in the real world. 3] Cynthia Compton s dissertation (2002) was to confirm that lab results accurately predicted real-world results.

R-SPACE Recording System (patent-pending) A multiple long-gun microphone array captures environmental sounds from all horizontal directions, before the sounds reach the center listening position. ------ 24 ------

R-SPACE playback system (patent-pending)

Lou Malnati s Restaurant with long-gun recording mic array and KEMAR for Compton s validation study.

Lou Malnati s Restaurant with long-gun recording mic array and KEMAR for Compton s validation study.

KEMAR was wearing three binaural pairs of hearing aid mics: Omni, Dmic, and Array mics for the Live condition in Compton s study.

Compton s Results Mean HINT thresholds across three hearing aid microphone conditions and four noise delivery environments 12 normal-hearing listeners. 0 Live R-SPACE IAC 180 0 IAC 90 0-5 -10-15 SNR for 50% Correct -20 Omni D-Mic DMic Array

Compton s Results Mean HINT thresholds across three hearing aid microphone conditions and four noise delivery environments. 0 Live R-SPACE IAC 180 0 IAC 90 0-5 -10-15 SNR for 50% Correct -20 Omni D-Mic DMic Array

New Work In recent advertising of a hearing aid, a manufacturer claimed 11-17 db of directional performance. But how does this aid perform for listeners in terms of speech intelligibility in real noisy environments?

New Work Methods: 1] The R-SPACE system was used to test speech intelligibility in noise for the experimental hearing aid. 2] Omni and directional (CCmic) microphones served as the control and standard sound pickup conditions. 3] Concurrent with the R-SPACE trials, results were to be double-checked by a separate real-world evaluation using recordings made in the Etymotic Research lunchroom.

Mary Meskan s R-SPACE Trials ITE test aids, omni, and CCmics worn by KEMAR in R-SPACE. Quick & Dirty SIN Test recordings were low-pass filtered at 2400 Hz to simulate hearing loss for 12 normal-hearing subjects.

R-SPACE playback system at Etymotic Research

R-SPACE RESULTS: Signal-to-Noise Ratio Loss 2400-Hz Low-Pass 12 Normal-Hearing Ss Presumed SNR Loss for normals with 2400 Hz low-pass filtering Estimated SNR-Loss (db) ±1 SE/mean Exp aid Omni-L Omni-R Exp-L Exp-R CC-L CC-R Exp aid Experimental aids appear to offer an improvement over omni mics, but not even as much as standard 5-dB AI-DI directional microphones only about 3 db of directional performance!

Ruth Bentler s Lunchroom Trials BTE test aids, omni, and CCmics worn by KEMAR in ER Lunchroom. Normal (N=15) and hearing-impaired (N=15) subjects. New Lunchroom SIN test by Mead Killion. Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) -10 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000-10 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Hearing Level in db (ANSI, 1996) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 X X X X X X X ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] Left Air Right Air X Hearing Level in db (ANSI, 1996) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 X ] X ] Left Air Right Air X ] ] ] X ] ] X ] X X ] ] ] ] X 120 120

The Etymotic Lunchroom Ref mic SLM KEMAR Mead

Mini shotgun mic used for sentences calibration. Boom mic used by MCK (with modified SLM) to monitor his voice level. Mini shotgun mic Boom mic connected to modified SLM

LUNCHROOM RESULTS: 8 8 Signal-to-Noise Ratio Loss 15 Normal and 15 Hearing-Impaired SNR-50 (db) SNR-50 (db) 6 4 2 0-2 6 4 2 0-2 -4-4 -6-6 -8-8 HI NORMAL Omni-R Omni-L Exp-R Exp-L CC-R CC-L

R-SPACE (12 Normal-hearing subjects with 2.4 khz LP filter to simulate 7 db SNR loss) LUNCHROOM (Bentler Hearingimpaired subjects) LUNCHROOM (Bentler Normalhearing subjects) Omni Mic Experimental Directional CC-Mic Hypercardiod

Comparison of Two Studies Compton Study New Study Normal-hearing subjects. Repeated measures each S got all conditions. Same test materials across conditions (modified HINT) Same mics across all environment conditions. Wide differences in directivity across microphone conditions. Normal-hearing and hearingimpaired subjects. Different Ss and test materials for Live and R-SPACE conditions. Test aid was BTE for Live, ITE for R-SPACE. Small differences in directivity across microphone conditions.

Comparison of Two Studies Compton Study New Study Normal-hearing subjects. Repeated measures each S got all conditions. Same test materials across conditions (modified HINT) Same mics across all environment conditions. Wide differences in directivity across microphone conditions. Normal-hearing and hearingimpaired subjects. Different Ss and test materials for Live and R-SPACE conditions. Test aid was BTE for Live, ITE for R-SPACE. Small differences in directivity across microphone conditions.

SUMMARY and CONCLUSIONS R-SPACE vs. Real-World Speech intelligibility in noise data were obtained from normalhearing, hearing-impaired, and filtered-normal-hearing subjects listening to recordings made in the ER lunchroom and in R-SPACE. As in Compton s (2002) study, the R-SPACE data in the present study agreed quite well with the real-world data. This was true not only in terms of rank ordering across conditions, but the R-SPACE and real-world trials gave approximately the same relative SNR-50 values across conditions. SENTENCE THRESHOLD FOR 50% CORRECT (db SNR) 5 0-5 -10-15 -20 SNR for 50% Correct Live R-SPACE IAC 180 0 Omni D-Mic DMic Array IAC 90 0 R-SPACE LUNCHROOM OMNI Mic EXPERIMENTAL Aid CC-Mic (Hypercardioid)

There s nothing like corroboration! The End