List of Institutions Number of School Name



Similar documents
2015 ETS Proficiency Profile Comparative Data Guide for Proctored Administrations

List of Institutions Number of School Name

2015 ETS Proficiency Profile Comparative Data Guide for Unproctored Administrations

2013 ETS Proficiency Profile Comparative Data Guide for Unproctored Administrations

Sophomore (30-60 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

All Students Master's (Comprehensive) Colleges and Universities I and II Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012

List of Institutions Number of School Name

2015 ETS Proficiency Profile Comparative Data Guide for Unproctored Administrations

2015 Major Field Test Comparative Data Guide Major Field Test for Criminal Justice

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Weekly Progress Report on Recovery Act Spending

U.S. Department of Education NCES NAEP. Tools on the Web

2015 ETS Proficiency Profile Comparative Data Guide for Proctored Administrations

How To Rate Plan On A Credit Card With A Credit Union

States Served. CDFI Fund 601 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 200, South, Washington, DC (202)

ANTHONY P. CARNEVALE NICOLE SMITH JEFF STROHL

NAAUSA Security Survey

NYCOM 2009 Entering Class - Matriculant Comparison Data

Regional Electricity Forecasting

Foreign Language Enrollments in K 12 Public Schools: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society?

New York Public School Spending In Perspec7ve

2016 Individual Exchange Premiums updated November 4, 2015

State Corporate Income Tax-Calculation

Mapping State Proficiency Standards Onto the NAEP Scales:

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Continuing Competence

University of Saint Joseph College of Pharmacy

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

Champions of Character Five Star Institutions

Fact Sheet* Physical Therapist Assistant Education Programs October 2015

Health of Wisconsin. Children and young adults (ages 1-24) B D. Report Card July 2010

ENS Governmental Format Status (As of 06/16/2008)

CDFI FUND NEW MARKETS TAX CREDIT PROGRAM:

Home Schooling Achievement

TITLE POLICY ENDORSEMENTS BY STATE

ehealth Price Index Trends and Costs in the Short-Term Health Insurance Market, 2013 and 2014

Florida Workers Comp Market

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: License Renewal Who approves courses?

Notices of Cancellation / Nonrenewal and / or Other Related Forms

Health Insurance Coverage of Children Under Age 19: 2008 and 2009

The Youth Vote in 2012 CIRCLE Staff May 10, 2013

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona NOTICE TO: DEBTOR ATTORNEYS, BANKRUPTCY PETITION PREPARERS AND DEBTORS

LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Top Line Report. June 11, 2012

NHIS State Health insurance data

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona

States Future Economic Standing

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

Hourly Wages. For additional information, please contact:

THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Incarcerated Women and Girls

APICS OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT EMPLOYMENT OUTLOOK REPORT SUMMER 2013

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: Continuing Competence

2014 APICS SUPPLY CHAIN COUNCIL OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT EMPLOYMENT OUTLOOK

Enrollment Snapshot of Radiography, Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine Technology Programs 2013

Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q May 2014

Health Insurance Exchanges and the Medicaid Expansion After the Supreme Court Decision: State Actions and Key Implementation Issues

Standardized Pharmacy Technician Education and Training

CINCINNATI HILLS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY COLLEGE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENTS

50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO Fax:

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

REPORT: DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS

Champions of Character Five Star Institutions

Health Workforce Data Collection: Findings from a Survey of States

How To Regulate Rate Regulation

Department of Business and Information Technology

2015 Major Field Test Comparative Data Guide Major Field Test for Computer Science

Forethought Medicare Supplement and ForeLife Final Expense Life Insurance Phase 1

The Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Programs in Communication. Sciences and Disorders has been conducted since Surveys were conducted in

National Student Clearinghouse. CACG Meeting

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Jurisdiction Licensure Reference Guide Topic: PTA Supervision Requirements

GE Inventory Finance. Unlock your cash potential.

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Vocational Rehabilitation

3. How Do States Use These Assessments?

In Utilization and Trend In Quality

List of low tuition universities in the USA. 1. Louisiana Tech University, LA Total Cost to. International Students: $17,472

LICENSED SOCIAL WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES, 2004 SUPPLEMENT. Chapter 2 of 5. Who Are Licensed Social Workers?

Issuers Owing Rebates for 2012 Data as of August 1, 2013 Rebates in the Individual Market

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

University of Florida

Enrollment Snapshot of Radiography, Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine Technology Programs 2014

Issuers Owing Rebates for 2012

The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company Variable Life Portfolio

Hail-related claims under comprehensive coverage

AAIS Mobile-Homeowners 2008 Series

Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in the United States: Current Patterns of Distribution and Recent Trends. Preliminary Tables and Figures

2014 Year in Review State Policies Impacting CTE. Catherine Imperatore, ACTE Andrea Zimmermann, NASDCTEc February 5, 2015

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance

Preapproval Inspections for Manufacturing. Christy Foreman Deputy Director Division of Enforcement B Office of Compliance/CDRH

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Challenges and Progress: Implementing HIV Screening in Health-Care Settings

State Technology Report 2008

Transcription:

Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students ALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE, CT 600 ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE, KY 640 ANDERSON UNIVERSITY - SOUTH CAROLINA, SC 2,048 ASBURY COLLEGE, KY 415 ASHFORD UNIVERSITY, IA 762 AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY AT NAPLES, FL 279 BENEDICT COLLEGE, SC 662 BENNETT COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, NC 345 BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE, MS 240 BLUFFTON UNIVERSITY, OH 1,015 BRESCIA UNIVERSITY, KY 303 BREWTON-PARKER COLLEGE, GA 489 BRYAN COLLEGE, TN 39 CAZENOVIA COLLEGE, NY 436 CHOWAN UNIVERSITY, NC 86 CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY, GA 1,270 COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, SC 99 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO, CO 164 CONCORDIA COLLEGE, MN 1,316 COVENANT COLLEGE, GA 152 DENISON UNIVERSITY, OH 204 DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY, ND 1,174 DORDT COLLEGE, IA 694 EASTERN MENNONITE UNIVERSITY, VA 174 ECKERD COLLEGE, FL 253 ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY, NC 1,220 ENDICOTT COLLEGE, MA 601 ERSKINE COLLEGE, SC 408 FERRUM COLLEGE, VA 493 FISHER COLLEGE, MA 377 FISK UNIVERSITY, TN 413 FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE, FL 39 HESSER COLLEGE, NH 46 HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY, NC 480 HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY, TX 342 JAMESTOWN COLLEGE, ND 60 JOHNSON C. SMITH UNIVERSITY, NC 865 LAGRANGE COLLEGE, GA 446 LANDER UNIVERSITY, SC 766 LIMESTONE COLLEGE - MIDSTATE, SC 90 MARANATHA BAPTIST BIBLE COLLEGE, WI 863 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students MARIETTA COLLEGE, OH 641 MASSACHUSETTS MARITIME ACADEMY, MA 1,147 MATER ECCLESIAE COLLEGE, RI 39 MEREDITH COLLEGE, NC 397 MIDWAY COLLEGE, KY 451 MILLIGAN COLLEGE, TN 309 MISSOURI SOUTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY, MO 2,874 MOREHOUSE COLLEGE, GA 1,779 MOUNT OLIVE COLLEGE, NC 176 MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY, OH 656 NEWBERRY COLLEGE, SC 217 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE, MN 121 OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, OH 58 PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE, VA 206 PRESENTATION COLLEGE, SD 498 RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE, VA 41 REINHARDT COLLEGE, GA 344 ROBERT B. MILLER COLLEGE, THE, MI 53 ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY, OK 77 SAINT JOSEPH'S COLLEGE - IN, IN 544 SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE, IN 378 SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY, WV 86 SOUTH COLLEGE, TN 175 SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, FL 1,115 SOUTHERN CATHOLIC COLLEGE, GA 135 SPELMAN COLLEGE, GA 1,886 STEVENSON UNIVERSITY, MD 531 TAYLOR UNIVERSITY - FORT WAYNE, IN 74 TAYLOR UNIVERSITY - UPLAND, IN 105 TENNESSEE WESLEYAN COLLEGE, TN 625 TOCCOA FALLS COLLEGE, GA 66 UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON, WV 301 UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT FORT KENT, ME 60 UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT PRESQUE ISLE, ME 336 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA - UPSTATE, SC 91 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA - ST. PETERSBURG, FL 129 UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS, KY 912 UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS, AR 103 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - PARKSIDE, WI 297 VANGUARD UNIVERSITY, CA 291 WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY, WV 67 WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY, NC 492 40,251 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

Distribution of Institutional Mean Total Scores Mean Number of Percent of Mean Number of Percent of Total Institutions Instns. Total Institutions Instns. Score Below Score Below 470 to 500.00 2 98 445 to 445.99 2 86 469 to 469.99 0 98 444 to 444.99 3 82 468 to 468.99 0 98 443 to 443.99 5 76 467 to 467.99 0 98 442 to 442.99 0 76 466 to 466.99 0 98 441 to 441.99 2 73 465 to 465.99 0 98 440 to 440.99 6 66 464 to 464.99 0 98 439 to 439.99 2 64 463 to 463.99 0 98 438 to 438.99 7 55 462 to 462.99 0 98 437 to 437.99 4 51 461 to 461.99 0 98 436 to 436.99 2 48 460 to 460.99 0 98 435 to 435.99 3 45 459 to 459.99 0 98 434 to 434.99 3 41 458 to 458.99 1 96 433 to 433.99 7 33 457 to 457.99 0 96 432 to 432.99 3 29 456 to 456.99 0 96 431 to 431.99 7 20 455 to 455.99 0 96 430 to 430.99 5 14 454 to 454.99 0 96 429 to 429.99 3 11 453 to 453.99 0 96 428 to 428.99 1 10 452 to 452.99 2 94 427 to 427.99 2 7 451 to 451.99 1 93 426 to 426.99 0 7 450 to 450.99 3 89 425 to 425.99 3 4 449 to 449.99 0 89 400 to 424.99 3 0 448 to 448.99 0 89 447 to 447.99 1 88 446 to 446.99 0 88 Total Number of Institutions 83 Mean 437.61 Std. Dev. 9.72

Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores Skills Subscores Critical Thinking Reading Writing Math No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to 130 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 125 to 125.99 0 100 2 98 0 100 0 100 124 to 124.99 0 100 0 98 0 100 0 100 123 to 123.99 0 100 0 98 0 100 0 100 122 to 122.99 0 100 1 96 0 100 1 99 121 to 121.99 0 100 0 96 0 100 0 99 120 to 120.99 1 99 3 93 1 99 0 99 119 to 119.99 1 98 3 89 1 98 1 98 118 to 118.99 0 98 6 82 0 98 0 98 117 to 117.99 0 98 9 71 1 96 1 96 116 to 116.99 1 96 13 55 2 94 0 96 115 to 115.99 0 96 11 42 7 86 4 92 114 to 114.99 0 96 12 28 10 73 6 84 113 to 113.99 5 90 11 14 20 49 10 72 112 to 112.99 4 86 7 6 16 30 10 60 111 to 111.99 12 71 1 5 16 11 15 42 110 to 110.99 13 55 1 4 6 4 16 23 109 to 109.99 19 33 1 2 0 4 12 8 108 to 108.99 14 16 2 0 2 1 4 4 107 to 107.99 9 5 0 0 0 1 1 2 106 to 106.99 1 4 0 0 1 0 2 0 100 to 105.99 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of 83 83 83 83 Institutions Mean 110.09 115.73 113.04 111.78 Standard Deviation 2.53 3.02 2.09 2.55

Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores (continued) Context-based Subscores Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to 130 0 100 0 100 0 100 125 to 125.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 124 to 124.99 0 100 0 100 0 100 123 to 123.99 1 99 0 100 1 99 122 to 122.99 1 98 0 100 0 99 121 to 121.99 0 98 1 99 0 99 120 to 120.99 0 98 0 99 1 98 119 to 119.99 1 96 2 96 0 98 118 to 118.99 0 96 0 96 1 96 117 to 117.99 0 96 0 96 1 95 116 to 116.99 7 88 0 96 4 90 115 to 115.99 5 82 5 90 9 80 114 to 114.99 12 67 5 84 15 61 113 to 113.99 14 51 6 77 17 41 112 to 112.99 17 30 15 59 16 22 111 to 111.99 15 12 17 39 13 6 110 to 110.99 6 5 16 19 1 5 109 to 109.99 1 4 11 6 1 4 108 to 108.99 3 0 2 4 2 1 107 to 107.99 0 0 1 2 1 0 106 to 106.99 0 0 2 0 0 0 100 to 105.99 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of 83 83 83 Institutions Mean 113.26 111.87 113.54 Standard Deviation 2.51 2.47 2.33

Distribution of Individual Students' Total Scores Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Score Below Score Below Score Below Score Below 500 >99 475 97 450 79 425 26 499 >99 474 96 449 78 424 24 498 >99 473 96 448 77 423 21 497 >99 472 96 447 75 422 20 496 >99 471 95 446 75 421 17 495 >99 470 95 445 73 420 16 494 >99 469 94 444 71 419 15 493 >99 468 94 443 70 418 12 492 >99 467 93 442 67 417 11 491 99 466 93 441 66 416 10 490 99 465 92 440 64 415 8 489 99 464 91 439 61 414 7 488 99 463 91 438 60 413 6 487 99 462 90 437 56 412 5 486 99 461 90 436 55 411 4 485 99 460 89 435 51 410 4 484 99 459 88 434 49 409 3 483 98 458 87 433 47 408 2 482 98 457 87 432 44 407 2 481 98 456 85 431 42 406 2 480 98 455 85 430 38 405 1 479 98 454 84 429 36 404 1 478 97 453 83 428 34 403 1 477 97 452 82 427 31 402 <1 476 97 451 81 426 29 401 <1 400 0 No. of Students 37,664* 90th percentile 460 Mean 436.4 75th percentile 446 Standard Deviation 17.6 50th percentile 434 25th percentile 424 10th percentile 416 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

Scaled Score Entering Freshman (No hours completed) Distribution of Individual Students' Subscores Skills Subscores: Percent of Students Below Each Scaled Score Critical Context-Based Subscores: Pct. of Students Below Each Scaled Score Social Natural Thinking Reading Writing Mathematics Humanities Sciences Sciences 130 >99 99 >99 >99 >99 >99 >99 129 >99 98 >99 >99 99 >99 >99 128 >99 96 >99 >99 99 >99 >99 127 99 94 >99 99 98 >99 >99 126 99 93 99 98 97 98 99 125 99 91 99 97 96 97 98 124 97 85 98 97 94 96 95 123 97 83 97 95 93 96 94 122 96 80 97 94 89 95 93 121 95 75 92 92 88 94 88 120 92 72 90 90 84 88 83 119 91 67 88 86 82 86 82 118 90 61 86 85 77 84 77 117 87 59 76 82 73 82 68 116 84 53 73 78 71 77 66 115 80 45 66 71 64 73 64 114 77 44 56 67 62 67 53 113 73 38 48 62 54 60 47 112 68 31 39 56 48 53 43 111 62 25 32 49 41 49 34 110 55 24 25 41 36 43 30 109 51 17 17 35 24 32 21 108 41 13 13 25 23 29 18 107 32 11 11 18 13 24 12 106 24 7 6 13 7 13 6 105 19 4 5 7 6 10 5 104 13 3 3 4 3 7 2 103 7 1 2 2 1 2 1 102 4 1 1 1 <1 1 <1 101 2 <1 <1 1 <1 1 <1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Students 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* Mean Score 109.7 115.3 112.8 111.6 112.8 111.4 113.2 Standard Deviation 5.7 6.7 4.9 5.6 6.0 5.7 5.6 90th percentile 118 124 120 119 122 120 121 75th percentile 113 121 116 115 117 115 117 50th percentile 108 115 113 111 112 111 113 25th percentile 106 111 109 108 109 107 109 10th percentile 103 106 106 105 106 105 106 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

Summary of Proficiency Classifications Percent of Students Classified as Skill Dimension and Level Not Proficient Marginal Proficient Critical Thinking 3% 10% 88% Reading, Level 2 22% 17% 61% Reading, Level 1 49% 25% 26% Writing, Level 3 4% 19% 77% Writing, Level 2 12% 30% 58% Writing, Level 1 50% 33% 17% Mathematics, Level 3 4% 11% 85% Mathematics, Level 2 18% 23% 58% Mathematics, Level 1 42% 29% 30% Total Number of Students: 40,251 Weighted Number of Students: 37,664* *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category AGE Under 20 94% 94% 20 to 29 4% 4% 30 to 39 1% 1% 40 to 49 <1% <1% 50 to 59 <1% <1% 60 or more <1% <1% GENDER Male 43% 43% Female 57% 57% ETHNICITY American Indian/Alaskan Native 1% 1% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Is. 2% 2% African American 26% 25% Black Hispanic 1% 1% Hispanic 3% 3% Latin American 1% 1% White 63% 63% Other 4% 4% BEST LANGUAGE English 90% 90% Other Language 7% 7% Both Equal 3% 3% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category ENROLLMENT STATUS Full Time 98% 98% Part Time 2% 2% CREDIT HRS TRANSFERRED Not a Transfer 98% 98% 0-15 Hours Transferred 1% 1% 16-30 Hours Transferred <1% <1% >30 Hours Transferred <1% <1% HOURS WORKED FOR WAGES None 43% 43% 1-15 Hours 30% 30% 16-30 Hours 21% 21% >30 Hours 6% 6% CUMULATIVE GPA 3.50-4.00 27% 26% 3.00-3.49 42% 42% 2.50-2.99 23% 24% 2.00-2.49 7% 7% 1.00-1.99 1% 1% Less than 1.00 <1% <1% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.